46. Confutation Denounced by Lutherans.

In the opinion of the Lutherans, the final draft of the Confutation,

too, was a miserable makeshift. True, its tone was moderate, and, with

few exceptions, personal defamations were omitted. The arrangement of

subjects was essentially the same as in the Augustana. Still it was not

what it pretended to be. It was no serious attempt at refuting the

Lutheran Confession, but rather an accumulation of Bible-texts,

arbitrarily expounded, in support of false doctrines and scholastic

theories. These efforts led to exegetical feats that made the

Confutators butts of scorn and derision. At any rate, the Lutherans

were charged with having failed, at the public reading, to control their

risibilities sufficiently. Cochlaeus complains: "During the reading many

of the Lutherans indulged in unseemly laughter. _Quando recitata fuit,

multi e Lutheranis inepte cachinnabantur._" (Koellner, 411.) If this did

not actually occur, it was not because the Confutators had given them no

cause for hilarity.

"Altogether childish and silly"--such is Melanchthon's verdict on many

of their exegetical pranks. August 6 he wrote letter after letter to

Luther, expressing his contempt for the document. "After hearing that

Confutation," says Melanchthon, "all good people seem to have been more

firmly established on our part, and the opponents, if there be among

them some who are more reasonable, are said to be disgusted

(_stomachari_) that such absurdities were forced upon the Emperor, the

best of princes." (_C. R._ 2, 252.) Again: Although the Emperor's

verdict was very stern and terrible, "still, the Confutation being a

composition so very puerile, a most remarkable congratulation followed

its reading. No book of Faber's is so childish but that this Confutation

is still more childish." (253.) In another letter he remarked that,

according to the Confutation, in which the doctrine of justification by

faith was rejected, "the opponents had no knowledge of religion

whatever." (253.)

August 4 Brenz wrote to Isemann: "All things were written in the fashion

of Cochlaeus, Faber, and Eck. Truly a most stupid comment, so that I am

ashamed of the Roman name, because in their whole Church they can find

no men able to answer us heretics at least in a manner wise and

accomplished. _Sed omnia conscripta erant Cochleice et Fabriliter et

Eccianice. Commentum sane stupidissimum, ut pudeat me Romani nominis,

quod in sua religione non conquirant viros, qui saltem prudenter et

ornate nobis haereticis responderent._" (245.) August 15 Luther

answered: "We received all of your letters, and I praise God that he

made the Confutation of the adversaries so awkward and foolish a thing.

However, courage to the end! _Verum frisch hindurch!_" (Enders, 8, 190.)

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 51 / 313 题