36. Papal Party Refusing Conciliation.

At the Diet of Augsburg, convened in order to restore the disturbed

religious peace, the Lutherans were the first to take a step towards

reconciliation by delivering their Confession, June 25, 1530. In

accordance with the manifesto of Emperor Charles, they now expected that

the papal party would also present its view and opinion, in order that

the discussions might thereupon proceed in love and kindness, as the

Emperor put it. In the Preface to their Confession the Lutherans

declared: "In obedience to Your Imperial Majesty's wishes, we offer, in

this matter of religion the Confession of our preachers and of

ourselves, showing what manner of doctrine from the Holy Scriptures and

the pure Word of God has been up to this time set forth in our lands,

dukedoms, dominions and cities, and taught in our churches. And if the

other Electors, Princes, and Estates of the Empire will, according to

the said imperial proposition, present similar writings, to wit, in

Latin and German, giving their opinions in this matter of religion, we,

with the Princes and friends aforesaid, here before Your Imperial

Majesty, our most clement Lord, are prepared to confer amicably

concerning all possible ways and means, in order that we may come

together, as far as this may be honorably done, and, the matter between

us on both sides being peacefully discussed without offensive strife,

the dissension, by God's help, may be done away and brought back to one

true accordant religion; for as we all are under one Christ and do

battle under Him, we ought to confess the one Christ, after the tenor of

Your Imperial Majesty's edict, and everything ought to be conducted

according to the truth of God; and this is what, with most fervent

prayers, we entreat of God." (39, 8.)

The Lutherans did not believe that the manifesto of the Emperor could be

construed in any other way than that both parties would be treated as

equals at the Diet. Not merely as a matter of good policy, but _bona

fide,_ as honest Germans and true Christians, they clung tenaciously to

the words of the Emperor, according to which the Romanists, too, were to

be regarded as a party summoned for the trial, the Emperor being the

judge. The Lutherans simply refused to take the word of the Emperor at

anything less than par, or to doubt his good will and the sincerity of

his promise. The fact that from the very beginning his actions were in

apparent contravention of the manifesto was attributed by the Lutherans

to the sinister influence of such bitter, baiting, and unscrupulous

theologians as Eck, Cochlaeus, and Faber, who, they claimed, endeavored

to poison and incite the guileless heart of the Emperor. Thus the

Lutherans would not and could not believe that Charles had deceived

them,--a simple trust, which, however, stubborn facts finally compelled

them to abandon.

The Romanists, on the other hand, boasting before the Emperor that they

had remained with the true Christian faith, the holy Gospel, the

Catholic Church, the bull of the Pope, and the Edict of Worms, refused

with equal tenacity to be treated as a party summoned for trial. June

25, 1530, Elector John wrote to Luther: "Thus we and the other princes

and estates who are related to us in this matter had to consent to

submit our opinion and confession of faith. Our opponents, however, as

we are told, declined to present theirs and decided to show to the

Emperor that they adhered to the Edict [of Worms] and to the faith which

their fathers had bequeathed to and bestowed upon them, and which they

intended to adhere to even now; if, however the Pope or, in his place,

the Legate, together with His Imperial Majesty, would point out, and

expect them to adopt, a different and new faith, they would humbly hear

the Emperor's opinion." (Luther, St. L. 16, 758.)

Thus presupposing what they were summoned to prove at Augsburg, namely,

that the doctrine of the Pope was identical with the old Christian

faith, the Romanists declared a presentation of their views unnecessary.

The Lutherans, they maintained, were convicted apostates and rebels

against Pope and Church, against Emperor and realm; sentence was not

first to be pronounced upon them, but had been pronounced long ago, the

Diet's duty merely being to confirm and execute it; hence, there was

nothing else to be done by the Emperor than to attend to his office as

warden and protector of the Church, and, together with the princes and

estates, to proceed against the heretics with drastic measures. Also in

the later discussions, conducted with a view of effecting a

reconciliation, the Romanists refused to relinquish this position. From

beginning to end they acted as the accusers, judges, and henchmen of the

Lutherans. Nor was anything else to be expected, since, unlike the

Lutherans, they considered not God's Word, but the Pope the supreme

arbiter in religious matters. Thus from the very outset, the gulf

between the two parties was such that it could not be bridged. Common

ground was lacking. On the one side conscience, bound by the Word of

God! On the other, blind subjection to human, papal authority! Also

Romanists realized that this fundamental and irreconcilable difference

was bound to render futile all discussions. It was not merely his own

disgust which the papal historian expressed when he concluded his report

on the prolonged discussions at Augsburg: "Thus the time was wasted with

vain discussions." (Plitt, _Apologie,_ 43.)

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 41 / 313 题