12. Variations of the Apostles' Creed.

While there can be no reasonable doubt either that the Christian

churches from the very beginning were in possession of a definite and

formulated symbol, or that this symbol was an amplification of the

trinitarian formula of Baptism, yet we are unable to ascertain with any

degree of certainty what its exact original wording was. There has not

been found in the early Christian writers a single passage recording the

precise form of the baptismal confession or the rule of truth and faith

as used in the earliest churches. This lack of contemporal written

records is accounted for by the fact that the early Christians and

Christian churches refused on principle to impart and transmit their

confession in any other manner than by word of mouth. Such was their

attitude, not because they believed in keeping their creed secret, but

because they viewed the exclusively oral method of impartation as the

most appropriate in a matter which they regarded as an affair of deepest

concern of their hearts.

It is universally admitted, even by those who believe that the apostles

were instrumental in formulating the early Christian Creed, that the

wording of it was not absolutely identical in all Christian

congregations, and that in the course of time various changes and

additions were made. "Tradition," says Tertullian with respect to the

baptismal confession, received from the apostles, "has enlarged it,

custom has confirmed it, faith observes and preserves it." (Zahn, 252.

381.) When, therefore, Tertullian and other ancient writers declare that

the rule of faith received from the apostles is "altogether one,

immovable, and irreformable," they do not at all mean to say that the

phraseology of this symbol was alike everywhere, and that in this

respect no changes whatever had been made, nor that any clauses had been

added. Such variations, additions, and alterations, however, involved a

doctrinal change of the confession no more than the Apology of the

Augsburg Confession implies a doctrinal departure from this symbol. It

remained the same Apostolic Creed, the changes and additions merely

bringing out more fully and clearly its true, original meaning. And this

is the sense in which Tertullian and others emphasize that the rule of

faith is "one, immovable, and irreformable."

The oldest known form of the Apostles' Creed, according to A. Harnack,

is the one used in the church at Rome, even prior to 150 A.D. It was,

however, as late as 337 or 338, when this Creed, which, as the church at

Rome claimed, was brought thither by Peter himself, was for the first

time quoted as a whole by Bishop Marcellus of Ancyra in a letter to

Bishop Julius of Rome, for the purpose of vindicating his orthodoxy.

During the long period intervening, some changes, however, may have

been, and probably were, made also in this Old Roman Symbol, which reads

as follows:--

_Pisteuo eis theon patera pantokratora; kai eis Christon Iesoun [ton]

huion autou ton monogene, ton kupion hemon, ton gennethenta ek

pneumatos hagiou kai Marias tes parthenou, ton epi Pontiou Pilatou

staurothenta kai taphenta, te trite hemera anastanta ek [ton] nekron,

anabanta eis tous ouranous, kathemenon en dexia tou patros, hothen

erchetai krinai zontas kai nekrous; kai eis pneuma hagion, hagian

ekklesian aphesin hamartion, sapkos anastasin._ (Herzog, _R. E._ 1,

744.)

Historical Introductions to the Symbolical Books of the Evangelical Lutheran Church · 第 14 / 313 题