CHAPTER XX

ITALY, FIFTEENTH CENTURY

The history of Renaissance jewellery in general may be approached by

reviewing the condition of Italian jewellery in the fifteenth century.

In the foregoing outline of European jewellery to the end of the

fifteenth century--which has served as an approximate date for the

termination of the mediæval epoch--practically no reference has been

made to Italy. One need only examine the general style of Italian

painting, architecture, and sculpture of the Quattrocento, to see how

far apart the art of Italy stands from that of the rest of Europe.

Italian jewellery certainly merits the great reputation it has always

possessed. Nor is this surprising, considering the prominent part played

by the goldsmiths in the renaissance of artistic taste--by these

craftsmen who, in the highest sense artists, were the first to break the

fetters of tradition, and yield to those impulses that sought a wider

field for the gratification of their creative instinct. Hence the

history of the jeweller's art in Italy at the period of the Quattrocento

largely resolves itself into the biographies of those master sculptors

and painters, who worked first as goldsmiths and jewellers, and

throughout their careers remained ever mindful of their original trade.

Venice, which in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries was the

wealthiest city and the principal port in Europe, though rivalled in the

former century by Bruges and by Antwerp in the latter, encouraged the

use of luxurious jewellery, as did the great cities of the north. But

Florence undoubtedly took the lead as an artistic centre, judging alone

by the artists she produced. The paintings of the Venetian school (the

work of Crivelli, for instance), and those of the schools of Tuscany,

etc., reveal the exquisite beauty of ecclesiastical jewellery, and of

the ornaments with which men, no less than women, loved to deck their

persons. Nearly every painter possessed an insight into the mysteries of

the goldsmith's craft, and represented his subject, whatever it might

be, with careful attention to its jewelled accessories. The great

merchants of opulent and artistic cities, such as Siena, Milan, and

others, besides Venice and Florence, delighted in rich jewels; and the

masters of the schools of painting which had their centres in these

towns have preserved in glowing pigment a faithful record of these

delicate works of art, on which the eminent jewellers of the day

lavished their skill and ingenuity.

The great superiority and beauty of the personal ornaments revealed

to us in this manner must first of all be ascribed to that awakening

to the full joy of life that was so characteristic a feature of the

Renaissance. The rapture of spring ran hot in men's veins. Life was

an uninterrupted succession of revelry and gaiety, amid splendour

of colouring and glitter of gold. The goldsmith emerges from the

subordinate state he occupied in the mediæval guild, and attains fame as

a free artist, whose duty was to minister personally to the luxurious

tastes of those who played a part in the gorgeous pageant of the new

epoch. The goldsmiths included among their ranks great master craftsmen,

whose perfection of technical skill seemed to find satisfaction only in

overcoming the greatest problems that their art could offer.

Vasari tells of the very close connection and almost constant

intercourse that existed between the goldsmiths and the painters.

Indeed, nearly every artist, before applying himself to painting,

architecture, or sculpture, began with the study of the goldsmith's

craft, and "passed the years of his apprenticeship in the technical

details of an industry that then supplied the strictest method of

design."[117]

[117] Symonds (J. A.), _Renaissance in Italy--The Fine Arts_, p. 91.

The names of several artists of the Renaissance have been handed down

who are specially recorded as having worked at jewellery. One of the

earliest of those who began their career in the goldsmith's workshops

is Ghiberti (b. 1378), who throughout life remained faithful to that

species of work. His jewellery is specially extolled by Vasari.

Following upon Ghiberti were two great jewellers, Tommaso (commonly

called Maso) di Finiguerra and Antonio Pollaiuolo; the former famous for

his nielli, the latter for his enamel-work upon relief. Pollaiuolo's

love for jewel-forms in his paintings (executed together with his

brother Piero) is seen not only in the Annunciation at Berlin, but in

the group of SS. Eustace, James, and Vincent in the Uffizi, and the

portrait of Simonetta Vespucci at Chantilly. Born in 1435, a few years

after Pollaiuolo, Andrea del Verrocchio resembled in the peculiar

versatility of his genius, others of these typical artists of the Middle

or High Renaissance--the Epoch of the Goldsmith it has been termed.

A jeweller whose influence in his own day was greater, and whose fame

almost equalled that of Cellini, was Ambrogio Foppa, called Caradosso,

who was born about 1446 at Milan. He worked first in the service of

Ludovico Sforza, and afterwards at Rome, where he died as late as

the year 1530. He seems to have been skilled in every branch of the

goldsmith's art, and especially excelled in making little medallions of

gold, enriched with figures in high relief and covered with enamels,

which were worn as enseignes in the hat or hair. His work in this

direction is highly extolled by Cellini, and his skill in enamelling

specially mentioned by Vasari.

Among the artists of the end of the fifteenth century who, after

being goldsmiths and jewellers, became celebrated as painters must be

mentioned Botticelli (1444-1510), Domenico del Ghirlandaio (1449-1494),

and Francia (1450-1517). Ghirlandaio is commonly referred to as a maker

of the jewelled coronals (_ghirlande_), popular with the unmarried and

newly wedded ladies of Florence. It is probable that he did produce this

class of work in early life; but his name seems to have been borne by

several members of his family, for in the fourteenth and fifteenth

centuries a goldsmith was often familiarly termed "Ghirlandaio," as one

of his chief occupations was the manufacture of the rich head-ornaments

then so much in vogue.

[Illustration: Pendant worn by one of The Three Graces in

Botticelli's "Primavera."]

Though Ghirlandaio does not fill his pictures with dainty details like

the intricate settings which Botticelli devised for the neck-pendants of

the Graces in his "Primavera," yet he invariably pays careful regard to

the representation of jewelled accessories. Such may be seen in the

well-known portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni (1488), belonging to Mr.

Pierpont Morgan (formerly in the Kann Collection). She has two jewels:

one, worn on her breast, is formed of a ruby in claw setting with a

small beryl above, and hung with three pendent pearls; the other,

specially introduced into the picture and lying beside her in a recess,

is composed of a cluster of stones--a ruby surrounded by two pearls and

three beryls--beautifully set, and surmounted by a winged dragon with

a sapphire over its head. Resting upon a table in the foreground of

another picture--a curious panel in the possession of Mr. George

Salting--representing Costanza de' Medici, are several pins, three rings

on a roll of parchment, and a pendant hung with three pearls and set

with a large and a small sapphire. In the Pitti Gallery is a portrait,

not by Domenico, but by his son Ridolfo Ghirlandaio, which may be here

alluded to owing to the special interest of its subject. The portrait is

that of a jeweller holding in his hand and gazing intently at what is

presumably one of his own creations--a richly enamelled jewel fashioned

in the form of a "pelican in its piety."

[Illustration: Jewel, in Ghirlandaio's portrait of Giovanna Tornabuoni.]

Concerning the jewellery of the great goldsmith of Bologna, Francesco

Raibolini, called Francia, a considerable amount of information has been

preserved. Born in 1450, he passed the best part of his life as a

goldsmith, and not till he was upwards of forty did he abandon the

goldsmith's art for that of the painter.[118] One of Francia's finest

paintings is the "Felicini" altar-piece in the Bologna Gallery, executed

in 1484 by commission of Messer Bartolomeo Felicini for the church of S.

Maria della Misericordia in that city. Among the many splendid gifts

this famous church had received was a jewel which the records say was

set by Francia himself. Its beauty was held in such esteem, that by

desire of the chapter the artist introduced it into his picture,

where it can be seen hanging over the head of the Madonna. Its centre

is occupied by a fine amethyst, and is bordered by deep blood-crimson

enamel, with pearls at the angles. So carefully is every detail of this

jewel painted, that a modern goldsmith has found no difficulty in

copying it with absolute exactness[119] (Pl. XXV, 1).

[118] Williamson (G. C.), _Francia_, pp. 2, 3, 21, 38.

[119] For a photograph of this jewel, and for the information

respecting it and the other works of this artist, I am indebted

to the kindness of Dr. Williamson.

[Illustration: _PLATE XXV_ FIFTEENTH-CENTURY PENDANTS, ETC.

(ITALIAN AND FLEMISH)]

The last of the great jewellers of the Quattrocento was Michelagnolo di

Viviano, who worked at Florence under the patronage of Lorenzo and

Giuliano de' Medici. He was the earliest instructor of the greatest

goldsmith and jeweller of the late Renaissance, Benvenuto Cellini, in

whose _Treatise_ and _Life_ he is spoken of with the highest praise.

From actual examples we obtain but slight information of the Italian

ornaments of the fifteenth century; but that there is a distinct

alteration in the style of jewellery between the Quattrocento and the

Cinquecento, the pictures of these great artistic periods offer abundant

proofs. This difference is particularly noticeable in ornaments for the

head. During the fifteenth century we find the forehead heightened, and

the space thus obtained emphasised by a single jewel placed at the top

of the brow. This form of ornament is admirably shown in Piero della

Francesca's "Nativity" in the National Gallery, and particularly in

his "Madonna and Child," with saints and angels, and with the donor,

Federigo of Montefeltro, Duke of Urbino, in the Brera, Milan. The

parts of these two pictures most characteristic of the artist are

the figures of the angels, who wear jewels executed with extraordinary

brilliancy--compositions of pearls in delicate goldwork enriched with

blue enamel. Precious stones and jewels were often sewn, at regular

intervals, all round the band of ribbon or galloon that encircled the

head, as seen in a portrait in the Ambrosiana, Milan, ascribed to

Ambrogio da Predis, and considered to be that of Beatrice d' Este; but

it is more usual to find in the centre of the brow an isolated jewel,

held by a narrow ribbon or silken cord, knotted at the back of the

head--as in Caroto's portrait of the Duchess Elizabeth Gonzaga in the

Uffizi, who wears on the forehead a jewelled scorpion, emblem of logic.

This head-ornament is known as the _ferronnière_; and the origin of its

title is somewhat peculiar. There is in the Louvre an attractive and

greatly admired portrait of a lady, with her hair held in place by

black cord supporting a diamond in the middle of the forehead. For

many years the portrait was entitled "La Belle Ferronnière," having been

erroneously considered to be that of the blacksmith's wife (ferronnière)

whose beauty enthralled Francis I in his declining years. It is now

generally held to be a portrait of Lucrezia Crivelli, mistress of

Ludovico Moro, Duke of Milan. The name of the painter is a matter of

dispute, though the work is still ascribed, as it has long been, to

Leonardo da Vinci. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, when the

Romantic movement was at its height, a similar ornament was revived, and

received its present name under a misconception of the subject of the

picture. In the sixteenth century this simple ornament is abandoned, and

it was the painter's task to depict magnificent coiffures like those of

Veronese's ladies, sprinkled with jewels and entwined with ropes of

pearls.

As regards the ornaments for the neck, the changes of fashion in the

two periods and the artistic mode of expressing the fashion demanded a

different style of jewellery. The slender neck which is displayed in the

portraits of the earlier period required lighter ornaments than did the

massive forms of the later. "The artist no longer trifled with single

gems, hanging on a thread, but painted a solid chain, and the light,

close-fitting necklace becomes pendent and heavy."[120] The distinct

refinement exhibited in Italy in the fifteenth and early sixteenth

centuries did not demand a great profusion or variety of jewellery. As

the pendent ornament for the neck-chain, a simple jewel formed by one

stone in the centre and smaller stones or four pearls around seems in

most cases to have been sufficient. Circular pendants of niello-work

surrounded by silver-gilt bands of corded ornament were much in use, and

a small number, dating from about 1460 to 1530, have survived. They

sometimes bear a religious subject (Pl. XIX, 4). But not infrequently

the head of a lady is represented in profile, generally with a flower

under her nose; and it is possible that these were worn by men as a

pledge of affection from their lady-love. Finger rings with somewhat

similar designs were also worn (Pl. XXIII, 16).

[120] Wölfflin (H.), _The art of the Italian Renaissance_, p. 234.

Beyond a small number of objects of this description, very few examples

of Italian Quattrocento jewellery have escaped the crucible. The change

of taste even between the early and the full Renaissance was sufficient

to cause their destruction. Among surviving jewels of this century is a

very beautiful gold and enamel pendant in the collection of Mr. Pierpont

Morgan. It is circular in form, and was probably intended as a

reliquary. Upon the front is an Annunciation in high relief. The garment

of the Virgin is enriched with red and blue, and that of the angel with

red and white enamel; the chequered base being of translucent green.

Around is a border of leaves and flowers enamelled red and white. The

open-work back consists of a central rosette, surrounded by interlacing

curves, and edged with a delicate wreath (Pl. XXV, 2).

It remains to draw attention, by means of a beautiful representation of

jewellery in painting, to an example of the style of brooch worn in

Florence in the latter part of the fifteenth century. The picture

referred to is that of the Virgin and Child (No. 296) in the National

Gallery. It is apparently the work of Verrocchio, Pollaiuolo, or one of

the goldsmith-painters of whom we have spoken; for the minute execution

of the ornaments would seem to denote the hand of an artist who had

practised the goldsmith's and jeweller's art. The brooch that serves as

a fastening for the Virgin's cloak--the same being represented on

that of one of the angels--is of most charming design. It has in the

centre a table-cut ruby, around which are set four pearls between

ornaments in the form of blackberries, surrounded by an outer border of

blackberry leaves. So carefully is the jewel drawn that every detail can

bear close inspection. A peculiar point of interest is that the pearls,

each of which is set in a couple of crutch-like clasps, appear to

correspond to the "perles à potences" frequently mentioned in the

contemporary jewel inventories of the Dukes of Burgundy.

[Illustration: Brooch worn by the Virgin in fifteenth-century Florentine

picture (No. 296, National Gallery, London).]

Some measure of compensation for the unfortunate lack of actual

examples of Italian Quattrocento jewellery is obtained, apart from their

representation in pictures, by the very remarkable use that was made of

jewel forms for the marginal decoration of manuscripts. Such enrichments

of the borders of missals, etc., by means of painted jewel ornaments,

would seem to be but the direct outcome of the system whereby most of

the painters, sculptors, architects, and no less eminent miniaturists

received their first instruction in art in the workshops of the

goldsmiths. It is certain from their quality that the jewels

represented in manuscripts, generally in their natural size, are the

work of artists well acquainted with the jeweller's art, whose eyes were

further impressed by the embroidered edgings of ecclesiastical vestments

enriched with jewel ornaments and sewn with pearls and precious stones.

In painting with corresponding luxury the border decorations of church

missals, the miniaturists have obviously not drawn on their imagination,

or constructed jewel forms in a mere haphazard manner. The individual

pieces, often complete jewels, are just such as might at the time have

been found on the shelves of some goldsmith's workshop.

Among the most skilful of such reproductions of jewels are those in the

celebrated choir books of the cathedral of Siena, particularly the pages

painted by Liberale di Giacomo da Verona, who worked at Siena from the

year 1466. An examination of these illuminations reveals Liberale as an

artist thoroughly conversant with the jeweller's craft: so that his

work, together with that of his followers, such as the Florentine

Giovanni di Giuliano Boccardi, the Dominican Fra Eustachio, Litti di

Filippo Corbizi, Monte di Giovanni, Antonio di Girolamo, the famous

Attavante, and the various miniaturists of King Mathias Corvinus of

Hungary, apart from its charming execution, constitutes a veritable

storehouse of information respecting the ornaments of the period.

Particularly fine examples of jewelled and enamelled decorations are

also contained in choir books in the cathedral of Florence, missals in

the Barberini Palace, Rome, a Bible of Mathias Corvinus in the Vatican

Library, several books in the Brera at Milan, and the fine Glockendon

missal (_circa_ 1540) in the Town Library at Nuremberg. More important

perhaps than all is the Grimani Breviary, now in the Library of St.

Mark's, Venice. The ornamentation of this famous work, the product of a

Flemish artist of the final years of the fifteenth century, displays a

northern naturalism favourable to the striking representation of jewel

forms, and serves to illustrate the close and active relationship then

existing between the Flemish and Italian goldsmiths.[121]

[121] The whole of this magnificent work has been reproduced by

Sijthoff, of Leyden, under the direction of Scato de Vries and

Dr. S. Morpurgo.

[Illustration: A fifteenth-century jeweller. From _Ortus Sanitatis_

(Strasburg, about 1497).]

Jewellery · 第 20 / 37 章