OXONIENSIS.

Walthamstow.

_The Megatherium in the British Museum_ (Vol. vii., p. 590.).--It is much

to be regretted that A FOREIGN SURGEON should not have examined the

contents of the room which contains the cast of the skeleton of this animal

with a little more attention, before he penned the above article. Had he

done so, he would have found many of the original bones, from casts of

which the restored skeleton has been constructed, in Wall Cases 9 and 10,

and would not have fallen into the error of supposing that it is a

_fac-simile_ of the original skeleton at Madrid. _That_ specimen was

exhumed near Buenos Ayres in 1789; whilst our restoration {20} has been

made from bones of another individual, many of which are, as I have stated,

to be found in the British Museum itself, and others in that of the Royal

College of Surgeons. I are not about to defend the propriety of putting the

trunk of a palm-tree into the claws of the Megatherium, though I do not

suppose that the restorer ever expected, when he did so, that any one would

entertain the idea that this gigantic beast was in the habit of climbing

trees; but I would fain ask your correspondent on what grounds he makes the

dogmatic assertion that "Palms there were none, at that period of telluric

formation." I will simply remind him of the vast numbers of fossil fruits,

and other remains of palms, in the London clay of the Isle of Sheppey.

Notes and Queries, Number 192, July 2, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 92 / 151 题