edifice. The reader will perceive, from the inspection of the
plan (Plate XIII.), how utterly impossible it is to give a more
detailed, and, at the same time, clear, description of its various
compartments. The confusion of successive rooms, corridors, small
and large courts, and temples, together with the total absence of any
attempt at regularity, excited my curiosity to find out the nature of
this singular construction. It has evidently been built by wretched
architects, at different periods, in an age when the art had sadly
declined in Ethiopia; but, before alluding to the different surmises
concerning the object of its erection, I will first give a detailed
description of the principal temple in the centre. The view (Plate
XIV.) will give a good idea of its present state of preservation. The
columns in Plates XIII., XIV., and vignette, executed architecturally,
will sufficiently indicate the style of art: a few fragments of
capitals alone remain, and those are on the north-east side of the
temple. It will be seen by Plate XIV. that the forms only of several
of the capitals are visible, but only one fragment has the appearance
of having been finished. (See vignette.) Their form is somewhat
similar to that usual in the Ptolemaic age of architecture in Egypt;
but the ornaments of the fragment, above alluded to, consist only of
parallel lines: whether these terminated in the lotus flower cannot
be ascertained, but there certainly is a resemblance, though not
complete, to a Ptolemaic capital. Under the capital of this column
are seven rows of beading; the rest of the shaft, consisting of five
pieces, is fluted, except the lowest stone, which is ornamented with
the lotus flower. The style of the fluting is Grecian. The shaft
swells out a little towards the lower part, and is rounded off at
the bottom. It bears another resemblance to the Egyptian style in
the base it rests upon being circular. There remains one fragment
(see vignette), of a fluted column with a smooth panel in the centre,
in which a wreath is sculptured in imitation of the leaves of the
palm tree. Another fragment of a column is ornamented with sculpture,
and at the base the triangular ornament not unlike the Egyptian.
[Illustration: COLUMNS AT WADY EL OWATAIB.]
The sculpture is in very high relief—not less than 1¾ inch; but
the style is decidedly bad: the figures are generally from about 3
to 4 feet in height; and, notwithstanding their defaced condition, I
could distinguish that some of them are _en face_; but the rudeness of
the execution of what remains perfect, demonstrates an epoch when the
arts had wofully degenerated in this their parent land. At Uffidunia,
in Lower Nubia, an edifice well known to be Roman, there is a piece
of sculpture on the detached propylon very much in this style. The
view (Plate XV.) represents fortuitously almost all the most perfect
fragments which now exist; and so completely shows the style of
the sculpture, that I regretted the less not having time to make
separate drawings, particularly as not a single hieroglyphic remains,
or has ever existed, to elucidate the sculpture. I trust, therefore,
that the accurate notes I took on the spot, of every fragment I
could find, and the specimens of the style in my drawings, will be
considered quite sufficient. What sculpture remains, is chiefly on
the lower part of two columns and on several fragments which lie
scattered about: some of the figures are _en face_, and some _en
profile_. Notwithstanding their defaced condition, I distinguished
the following:—Thriphis with the lion’s head, _en profile_;
the hawk-headed divinity (Horus); two figures, seemingly goddesses,
but not very discernible, _en face_; a divinity with a vase; Kneph,
_en face_, with a globe at his breast; a goddess, _en face_, in a
kind of monolithic temple. On another fragment I discerned a figure
presenting offerings with one hand, and the other raised behind
his head. On another large fragment, Isis, Horus, and a king were
discernible: the ovals of his name seem never to have been filled
up. On another fragment I observed a border consisting alternately
of a lion and the goddess of truth with outstretched wings. As there
are no hieroglyphics, the names of these divinities are, of course,
only inferred from the presence of their usual attributes. Except
on these fragments of columns in front of the central temple,
there are no other remains of sculpture in any part of these ruins,
with the exception of the two fragments of colossal statues I have
before alluded to as ornamenting the façades of the small temple
to the east. There are some other ruins at a short distance from the
great enclosure, but they are of little importance. One of the rooms
contains the remains of six columns, on one of which is sculptured
an elephant destroying a dog with his trunk, and on another a winged
lion is represented killing a man.
[Illustration: Pl. 15.
_On stone by W. P. Sherlock, from a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
WADY OWATAIB.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
I have now only to advert to the singular situation of these ruins,
their probable use, and the age when they were most probably
erected. In a direct line, they are distant from the river six
hours’ journey, which may be sixteen or eighteen miles. About a
quarter of a mile from the ruin, I saw three or four blocks of stones,
but no indication of their having formed part of an aqueduct, and
there are no traces of wells; but both may have existed, and be now
entirely buried by the sand of the desert. I could not, however,
observe or hear of any decided traces of aqueducts between the
ruin and the river. The occupants of the edifice may have been
supplied with water by geerbahs, as the peasants of Metammah and
other villages distant from the river are at this day.[21] If
the edifice was only used as a residence during the season of the
malaria, the rain water might have been preserved in cisterns and
in the sacred lakes; but rain does not invariably fall here every
year, and would afford, therefore, only a precarious supply. Those,
however, who constructed such a building would certainly know how
to sink a well, and, from the appearance of the ground, the trees,
and the vicinity of the mountains, I do not conceive it would be a
very laborious undertaking to find water.
Cailliaud considered this edifice to have been a college of priests;
and Professor Heeren supposes it to be the celebrated Ammonium. I
think neither of these suppositions probable. With regard to
the first, we know that the priests were always surrounded with
representations of the divinities and the mysterious language of
hieroglyphics; but is it not remarkable that there is no structure
either in Egypt or Ethiopia so destitute of the sacred writing as
this? The priests, also, are supposed, with great probability, to
have themselves executed the sculpture and hieroglyphics; and they
cannot be imagined to have been unacquainted with that language. It
must, on the contrary, have formed a principal branch of their
education. I think it, therefore, very improbable that the place
where they would be occupied in teaching hieroglyphics should, of
all the ruins in the valley of the Nile, be the only one destitute
of them; that where instruction was given in the mysteries of their
religion, there should be so few representations of the gods, and
those few almost of no use to the student, from being unexplained
by hieroglyphics. One would imagine they would have gladly availed
themselves of the opportunity of the unoccupied walls to exercise
the skill of the students. If this were a college, their system of
education must assuredly have been very defective, if they did not
take care to have the mysteries they taught represented on the walls
of the universities, and not on those of the temples only. We must
consider the Ethiopians as ignorant indeed, if we suppose that they
neglected to place them where they would have been really useful,
while they covered with these subjects their temples, where they
would be less observed, and the interior of the porticoes of their
tombs, which were rarely opened. Had it been a college, some urchin
would have shown his progress in the study by carving his name in
hieroglyphics; and, considering that this was more the fashion with
the ancients than the moderns, we should have as long a list of
Ethiopian names _here_ as we have of English at Eton or Harrow. In
such a seminary, I conceive, the walls of the chambers, corridors, and
temples, inside and outside, like the temples and palaces of Egypt,
would have been decorated with sculpture. The walls are not rough,
but smooth and finished; it has therefore not been the original
intention to embellish them with such subjects.
Had this edifice, as Professor Heeren supposes, been the Ammonium,
the original seat of the oracle of Jupiter Ammon, at whose command
those religious colonies issued forth, which carried civilisation,
arts, and religion from Ethiopia to the Delta; had this been the
centre and stronghold of the superstitions of the Nile; the priests,
the guardians of the sacred rituals, would not have omitted to
decorate the abode of their great divinity with art and magnificence
proportionate to the wealth and power of so great a nation. Well
aware of the awe with which the appearance of mysterious learning
inspires the vulgar, they would not have neglected to adorn the walls
with imposing and mysterious subjects, to augment their veneration,
to excite them to devotion, and to munificence in their offerings to
the god. It accords in no degree with the religious pomp elsewhere
displayed by the Ethiopians and Egyptians, to conceive that this
unfinished and comparatively insignificant temple contained the golden
altar, the “holiest of holies,” of their great divinity. That
the great Ethiopian oracle, whose celebrity even Homer has testified,
should not have had a more magnificent habitation than this, cannot
be admitted. We know, from Pausanias and others, the costly presents
which were made to the oracles of Greece; and can we conceive that
the Ethiopians, probably equally, if not as more ancient, a much
more religious and superstitious people, would have allowed their
celebrated Ammonium to be the least finished, least magnificent
and imposing, of all the temples which now exist in the valley of
the Nile?
It is a more probable supposition that, as the wealth of the oracle
of Apollo at Delphi exposed it from the beginning to the enterprises
of avaricious and impious men, and was too powerful a temptation
even to the Phocians, in the same manner the great oracle of Ammon
in the valley of the Nile, particularly in a country like Ethiopia,
where history tells us that gold was once so plentiful, might suffer
from the celebrated altar which was dedicated to its worship being
loaded with the valuable and magnificent devotional offerings
of a wealthy and superstitious people. Such parade and splendour
would serve as incentives to the enemies of their religion, equally
anxious to appropriate the spoil and eradicate the superstitions of
the worshippers of Ammon. But it is most probable that, at the time
when the religion of the Gospel was widely spread in this part of
Africa, some Christian king of Ethiopia, zealous, and desirous of
obliging his subjects to embrace the true religion, and aware that,
if his faith prevailed at all, it must prevail, to use the language
of Paley, by the overthrow of every statue, altar, and temple in
the world, may have utterly destroyed not only the Ammonium, but
also many of the other temples; and this may account for the few
remains of sacred edifices which are now found in Ethiopia. Another
argument, in answer to the supposition of Professor Heeren, is, that,
among the numerous representations of the divinities on the columns
of the principal temples, there is not one single figure of Ammon,
except with the attributes of Kneph.
This edifice may have been a _château de chasse_ of the king, or a
palace in which he passed the rainy season, which might then, as now,
be unhealthy near the Nile. The objection to this supposition is,
that the kings as well as the priests were generally, and probably
always, surrounded with religious pomp and ceremony. I conceive it,
therefore, a more reasonable conjecture that it was an hospital, to
which invalids, particularly those suffering from malaria, were sent
during the rainy season. This will account for the immense courts and
chambers, and the insignificance of the temples, evidently intended
for persons of little consideration. From the experience I have
had of the climate of the desert, I must say I consider them much
more healthy, in any season, than the valley of the Nile. At the
instigation, I conceive, of some person acquainted with this fact,
the Pasha established a splendid hospital and college at Abou Zabel,
situated in the Desert, about twelve miles from Cairo. The dryness of
the atmosphere, the sand immediately absorbing any rain that falls,
renders these wildernesses in the highest degree salubrious. The
stones of which this edifice is constructed are nearly the same size
as those of the pyramids of Meroe; that is, about 1 foot high and 2½
feet long, and are apparently quarried from the neighbouring hills.
With regard to the antiquity of the ruins, it does not appear to me to
be very great. The sculpture, which, in the absence of hieroglyphics,
forms the only criterion, resembles, as already mentioned, that
on the propylons at Uffidunia; not exactly indicating that they
were built at the same period, but that they belonged equally to
the last stage of sculpture in the two countries; and, as the arts
first flourished in Ethiopia, they may have decayed there earlier
than in Egypt, particularly as the wealth and power of this country
diminished more rapidly, the Nile washing down to the lower valley
the source of their affluence and prosperity. From the Grecian
character of the fluting of the columns, as well as from the plan
of the temple and sculpture, it is not improbable that this edifice
was constructed about the period of Ergamenes, whose reign was coeval
with that of Ptolemy II. Diodorus describes this king of Ethiopia as
having had a Greek education, and having introduced into this his
native country a taste for the philosophy of Greece, and delivered
himself and his people from the tyranny of the priests; and perhaps,
I may add, he endeavoured, by the introduction of foreign ornaments,
to regenerate a taste for architecture and sculpture: but in this
specimen we only see the last effort of a people whose greatness was
passed away, their taste corrupted, and all the lights of knowledge
and civilisation just expiring. The elegant pyramids of Meroe differ
as widely, in taste and execution, from the immensely extensive
but ill-planned ruins of Wady el Owataib, as the best sculpture at
Thebes, during the age of Rameses II., differs from the corrupted
style under the Ptolemies and Cæsars.
CHAPTER IX.
DEFICIENCY OF WATER. — RETURN TO THE NILE. — WILD ANIMALS. —
ANCIENT CANAL. — TEMPLE OF ABOU NAGA. — DIFFICULTIES. — THE
MODERN CAPITALS OF ETHIOPIA. — SENNAAR. — THE DIFFICULTY OF
PENETRATING TO THE SOURCE OF THE BAHR EL ABIAD. — TRIBE OF ARABS ON
ITS BANKS. — WATER LESS SWEET THAN THAT OF THE BAHR EL AZRUK. —
ARAB DESCRIPTION OF THE RIVER. — INUNDATION OF THE NILE. — RETURN
TO SHENDY. — MAMELUKE EXERCISE.
I had intended to have proceeded from the ruins of El Owataib to
those of El Mecaurat, farther in the Desert; but my stock of water
was almost exhausted, in consequence of my guide and camel-driver
not having brought their own supply, according to agreement,
also on account of several of my own geerbahs proving bad, and our
consumption, owing to the extreme heat, having been twice what we
expected. Signor Bandoni seems to be apprehensive of a deficiency,
and anxious to guard against it; for yesterday evening I found him
in my tent with his mouth at a three-gallon geerbah. His draughts
were profounder than his philosophy, for by his earnestness he seemed
intent on trying whether he himself possessed that valuable faculty
which his experience in the desert had taught him the camels possess;
that of imbibing, at one draught, a sufficient store for a week. We
left the ruins at half-past twelve, and arrived at the Nile at half
past six. We saw on our road numerous traces of the lions, hyenas,
tigers (nimr), wild asses, and ostriches, and near the river,
guinea-fowls. Shortly before arriving at the Nile, we passed the
bed of a canal which seemed to be ancient. They informed me that it
extends very far into the Desert towards the ruins of Mecaurat.
_March_ 11. We left this morning at seven, and reached the ruins
of Abou Naga at nine. The two square pillars which remain of
this temple, are very curious. On each side is a representation
of what is generally called a figure of Typhon, above which is
the head of Isis or Athor. These figures are very much injured,
but the style is extremely bold and decidedly very ancient. The
people above Meroe, says Diodorus, worship Isis and Pan, and also
Hercules and Zeus. This Typhonian figure is called Pthah by many,
and considered as an immediate emanation from Jupiter. We have here
two more divinities to add to the Ethiopian list: I use this name,
for of all the antiquities existing in the valley of the Nile, these
have the most ancient appearance. The drawing will give an exact
idea of the style of the sculpture. The reader will remark that
this is no effort of a feeble and corrupt taste, no imitation of a
foreign (Egyptian) style, but the spirited work of an early period,
when the productions of art would naturally be more remarkable for
force and vigour than for exquisite or delicate finish. There are
no hieroglyphics, nor any appearance of there ever having been any,
which may be considered another proof of their great antiquity, an
edifice in which they are absent must either be of the most ancient
or most modern date: and certainly this latter description cannot
belong to the present structures. The style has evidently the stamp of
originality, and I therefore think it may be considered a fragment of
perhaps one of the most ancient temples which has ever been erected
in honour of the two great divinities, Isis and Typhon, or rather,
I should say, of the two principles of good and evil existing in the
world: for Isis, the Ceres of the Greeks, is a type of that benevolent
care of the Deity which furnishes men with the fruits of the earth;
and she is worshipped under the form of a woman, emblematical of
the maternal fondness of the great divinity. Under that view, she is
sometimes represented with her son, the infant Horus, on her knees,
as the source of the multiplication and increase of the human race.
[Illustration: TEMPLE OF ABOU NAGA.]
The figure which, in deference to the general opinion, I have called
Typhon, has been considered by many to be that of Pthah, from the
circumstance of almost similar representations having been found with
the name of that divinity in hieroglyphics; but, in the absence of
any inscription to decide the question of what this figure has been,
I must confess that I conceive it not impossible that it may be the
Hercules of the Ethiopians. Hercules, or the god of strength, would
be a type of the attribute of power in the great divinity; and that
this should be a leading representation in the primitive ages, is
not surprising, as, of course, muscular strength would then be the
endowment most highly prized. The fables of Hercules clearing the
earth of monsters were very probably partly derived from Ethiopia,
together with the worship of the divinity. The mythology of the
Ethiopians, as I may, perhaps, venture to mention more particularly
on a future occasion, appears by no means to have been a gross
polytheism. I do not mean to say that the “uncultivated mass,”
as Gibbon styles them, very little removed in point of intellect
from their fellow-labourers the oxen, could have entertained very
pure notions of religion; I only agree with those who conceive that
the more educated and enlightened classes worshipped these different
symbolical forms, not as separate and equally powerful divinities, but
as the types of the different attributes of the One great Deity. This
temple, which was about 150 feet long, seems to have been ornamented
with six pilasters, five feet square; but it was impossible to trace
the plan satisfactorily: and as I conceive the materials to have
been carried away, an excavation would be of little use. The plan
(2300 feet in circumference) shows that the town has been small,
and built of sun-burnt bricks.
[Illustration: PLAN OF THE RUINS NOW CALLED ABOU NAGA.]
I had intended to have gone from this place to the ruins of Mecaurat,
at eleven hours’ distance in the desert. The soldier who officiated
as my guide, on leaving the ruins of Wady el Owataib yesterday,
said that we could not visit the ruins of Mecaurat, as they were
situated farther in the desert; that we should most probably meet
with lions on the road; and that the danger would indubitably be
much greater than on the preceding night; that, at this season of
the year, it was folly to think of going there without a guard
or large caravan; and, to conclude, that he would not incur the
responsibility of taking me. This morning, to my surprise, he said
he was willing to accompany me, if I desired. In this uncertainty I
asked for information from the sheakhs and different peasants I met;
and the result of these enquiries was, that, Mecaurat being farther
in the mountains, lions are much more numerous there than at Wady
el Owataib; that we should probably fall in with them on the road;
that this was the most dangerous season, from their food being
scarce, and that none of the peasants lead their flocks there,
since fires do not always succeed in repelling them. A few years
ago there were few or none; but now the number was so great that I
ought not to hazard going. In fact, not one, by bribes or threats,
could be induced to join our caravan.
Notwithstanding this discouraging information, I was anxious not
to leave any of the antiquities of Ethiopia unexplored; and I felt
that I might have gone without very great risk, because we had a
proof, the night before last, of the effect of fire in frightening
lions away; and I believe, as long as there are camels, or any kind
of cattle, they would not, if unmolested, attack a human being. I
had learned, also, that there was one edifice not much ruined, and
conceived that in it a fortification might soon be made, which a lion
could not penetrate. My servants seemed evidently afraid, but said,
wherever I went they would accompany me; but my artist made so many
objections that I told him, in disgust, he might go or not, as he
thought proper. He took me at my word, and refused to accompany
me. I at first determined to go alone: but, after considering
that I should have to leave two camels and a servant with him;
that my caravan would thus be reduced in number; and as no other
camels could be procured, their owners being afraid of the lions,
I should not be able to take enough of water to enable me to stay
at the ruins a sufficient time to make all the drawings that would
be necessary; I gave up the expedition, conceiving that it was of
little importance. My funds, also, are now considerably reduced,
and I am not in a country where I can easily replenish them. The
heat is every day more intolerable. I ought, for private reasons,
to have long since been in Europe; my health has for several days
been very indifferent, from these annoyances, the excessive heat,
which for the first few days of its commencement is always most
prejudicial, and I must confess myself not a little disgusted.
I must be satisfied with having been at Meroe, on the site of the
capital of Ethiopia, which appears to me a satisfactory termination
to my more important labours in the lower part of the valley of the
Nile; and when the reader considers that I have now been nearly
fourteen months above Cairo, leading almost the life of an Arab,
without any of the comforts and charms of the civilised world,
I think he will not reproach me for not extending my travels to
Sennaar and the banks of the White River. Indeed, even had not
a private duty _obliged_ me to return to England, I should not,
I think, have gone very much farther south, as I could spend my
time much more usefully at Thebes; for, except those in the desert,
there are no antiquities beyond this point.
As to the modern capitals of Ethiopia, nothing can be more miserable
than those I have already seen. Sennaar, I am told, great, splendid,
and beautiful as the Arabs represent it, is very little larger,
and has not much more the appearance of a capital, than Shendy,
which, as I have said before, cannot be compared to many of the
small towns in Egypt. The poetical minds of the Arabs are fond of
describing in glowing terms the beauty of distant objects; as the
ancients placed the Garden of the Hesperides in the most remote
region; but the descriptions of modern travellers, and the accounts
of many sensible Turks, have satisfied me that Sennaar is not worth
half a day’s journey, and certainly not twenty-two, which would
be necessary to go thither and return.
As to the Bahr el Abiad, or White River, it would be extremely
difficult, if not impossible, to penetrate to any distance on
its banks; and it is now more than ever impracticable to attempt
the discovery of its source. The Governor at Kordofan has his
_gazwah_, or hunt for slaves, on the banks of that river: there is,
therefore, scarcely a family in that part that has not lost some
relation,—fathers their sons, husbands their wives, brothers their
sisters, children their parents,—and all would rejoice to avenge
their loss on the first white man who should imprudently venture into
their territory. The source of the Nile could only, I conceive, be
discovered by an armed force; and even that method would present great
difficulties. It would require a large army to subdue the great extent
of country through which the Bahr el Abiad probably passes. Not only
the chiefs, but the whole population, instead of any of them joining
the standard of the invader, or furnishing him with provisions, would
resolutely oppose him. Each man would fight with desperation for the
preservation of his property, family, and liberty. The Shillooks,
Numrum, and other brave and warlike tribes on the White River, are
not ignorant of the wretched lot of their brethren in Cairo. Many
a fugitive slave has carried the intelligence to his tribe of the
misery and hardships they endured after they were taken prisoners;
their sufferings from the scanty allowance of water in the desert;
the numbers who perished from fatigue, heat, and thirst; their painful
journey on foot, bound in the most cruel manner; their wretched food;
their ignominious exposure for sale in the Cairo market; and, perhaps,
the cruelty of their taskmasters. These are injuries, I think,
sufficient to sharpen their sabres, and inflame their hatred and
thirst for revenge, on all Mahometans and white men. The traveller
being French or English would be of no avail. They distinguish but
two races, Pagan and Mahometan, and two colours, black and white,
their friends and enemies.
As to the source of the Bahr el Abiad, and the situation of the
Mountains of the Moon, as the Arabs of this neighbourhood have
never been there, or seen any person who has visited either the one
or the other, their suppositions are not worth more, if so much,
as the conjectures of any intelligent man in London. I think it
more candid to confess that these subjects are still involved in a
mystery, which the armies of the Pasha may possibly one day clear up;
yet he can never subdue that country with the facility with which
he made himself master of the valley of the Nile: the difference of
creed, and the deep-rooted hatred against him which prevails there,
would oblige him almost to exterminate the whole population before
he could enjoy a peaceable possession of the territory. If his
ambitious views are diverted by European interference from another
track with his immense resources, large and disciplined army,
and the great superiority derived from fire-arms and artillery,
he might penetrate even to the source of the White River, and solve
that problem which has perplexed the literary men of every age. No
private individual would be so rash as to attempt this discovery. Were
there any possibility of success, for the hope of immortality,
men could be found to encounter fearlessly the heat and fatigue,
and other ordinary dangers of the journey; but no one would be so
foolish as to expose himself to the certain death which would be
the result of any attempt made at this period.
This discovery would have been more easily accomplished before the
Pasha’s conquest; before the war of colour, if I may so describe it,
commenced: but there does not seem to have been any recent intercourse
between the inhabitants of the kingdom of Shendy and the tribes on the
banks of the White River. If any credit can be given to the accounts
of the Arabs, there are cannibals not very far up its stream. I was
told that twenty days above its junction with the Bahr el Azruk, there
is a tribe of Arabs mixed with the Pagans. I can scarcely believe
this latter statement, otherwise it would present a somewhat less
difficult method of penetrating to a certain distance. I have been
assured by several Arab merchants, and also Turks, that the water of
the river is less sweet than that of the Azruk, that the caravans
stationed on what they call the Island, between the two rivers,
universally prefer the water of the latter. The Egyptians, therefore,
are indebted to the Azruk for the singular sweetness of the waters of
the Nile. The Arab’s invariable description of the Bahr el Abiad is,
that it has waves like the Red Sea, but the current is not powerful
like that of the Blue River; that a boat would sail rapidly up,
on account of the prevailing northerly winds, but it would be more
difficult to descend. It is not improbable that the reason of the
superior rapidity of the Blue River is its greater proximity to its
source in the mountains, whilst the Bahr el Abiad may pass through
immense districts, where the surface is more level and uniform.
Of the inundation of the Nile I will speak hereafter; only remarking
at present, that during the whole of this journey I have not met
one sensible Arab, who was ignorant that the rains in Ethiopia were
followed by the rise of the river, and that, according to the wetness
of the season, the inundation was more or less beneficial. I do not
mean to say that they are acquainted with the real causes of those
rains,—the rarefying of the air by the sun in his approach towards
the tropic, and the consequent rush of vapour from the neighbouring
seas; but the circumstance of the peasants here all being aware of
the rain as the season of the inundation, excites my surprise how
the ancients, particularly as many of them visited Meroe, could be
so ill acquainted with, or, indeed, have the slightest doubt of,
the true cause. The flourishing state of the country at that period,
and the probable extent of its commerce, renders this still more
singular. If they had not been actual witnesses to the tropical rains,
(and, according to Pliny, many were,) they must have heard of them,
over and over again, from authentic sources. The most uneducated
peasant in Europe, were he to see the rain fall in torrents for
a long period, the little rivulets running into a river in his
vicinity, and yet not be aware why the latter was swollen, would be
considered to display a tenfold degree of stupidity. It can only
be accounted for by their preferring to ornament their works with
ingenious speculations rather than admit an explanation which they
could not account for.[22] We arrived at Shendy this evening at nine.
_Metammah.—March_ 12. This morning the katshef at Shendy, with
his servants and dependants, went through the Mameluke exercise
for our amusement. Six entered the list on each side. Their lances
were stalks of the palm tree, about four or five feet long. The
combatants were about 300 or 400 yards apart at the commencement,
but when the contest became more animated, not more than 100. Each
one sallied out when he liked, armed with a single lance, and, when
there was no opponent in the field, rode near the opposite party,
and generally, when at the distance of from twenty to thirty feet,
flung his lance at his adversaries within their limits, to excite them
to come forth; otherwise, when the field was full, at those who were
galloping back from pursuing their adversaries. The attacked party
trusted to the speed of the horse to save him from the lance of the
one who followed him, who, having in his turn flung his lance, was
rode after by another of the opposite party, and thus the ball was
spiritedly kept up. The requisites for these manœuvres are, perfect
management of his horse, dexterity in avoiding his adversary’s
lance, and catching it, if possible, with his hand, which enables
him to turn again upon the assailant. They are only, as I have said,
allowed to go out with one lance, and when they have thrown it, are
dependent on their agility, and the swiftness of their horses, to
save themselves from their pursuers; but the qualities most admired,
and most necessary, are strength and dexterity in throwing the lance,
and fearless indifference to blows. Each well-directed and successful
aim was hailed with a shout of admiration, and those who seemed to
fear the contest were evidently despised. The exercise is fine, but
the wounds received are sometimes not slight. There is no ostensible
respect of persons. The servant throws his lance at his master,
and the master at the servant; yet, somehow, the katshef escaped
always amid the numbers of lances which were showered around him:
a clever courtier knows how to direct his aim. Between the servants
the game sometimes became serious, and blows were exchanged with
the appearance of real enmity.
I saw this morning a number of mats and baskets made by the women,
some of which are very beautiful. They make here, also, very neat
sandals, almost exactly resembling those of the ancients. At noon I
crossed to Metammah. I found that the katshef was absent. The soldier
he had deputed to perform the duties of his office promised me eight
camels, to cross the desert of Bahiouda to Meroueh.
CHAPTER X.
METAMMAH — DIFFICULTY OF FINDING CAMELS TO CROSS THE BAHIOUDA
DESERT. — WRETCHED STATE OF THE PEASANTS WHEN ATTACKED BY
ILLNESS. — INTERMITTENT FEVERS. — COSTUMES OF METAMMAH. —
WOMEN OF HIGH RANK. — THEIR LONG NAILS, MANNER OF INCREASING THEIR
LENGTH. — BAHIOUDA DESERT. — WELLS AT ABOULAY. — REFLECTIONS
ON THE DESERT LIFE. — SHAGEEA TRIBE. — WELLS CALLED GAGDOOL. —
SIGNOR B. UNWELL. — HASSANYEH TRIBE. — ANIMALS OF THE DESERT. —
GREYHOUND DOG. — WELL OF MAGAGA. — DANGEROUS ILLNESS OF SIGNOR
B. — WELL OF DELICIOUS WATER CALLED HALESS. — BEAUTY OF THE
SCENERY. — SHEPHERD BOYS. — CHARACTER OF THE ROCKS. — WELLS
OF GOOD WATER CALLED HANNEK AND PRASOLI. — THE MANNER THE SHAGEEA
SALUTE. — COPTIC CHRISTIAN CHURCH. — ARRIVAL AT THE TOWN OF
MEROUEH. — HIEROGLYPHICS ON A SLAB IN THE CASTLE.
_Metammah.—March_ 13. A sufficient number of good camels, or
rather dromedaries, being difficult to find, I was detained the
whole of the day near this miserable little town, where there is
nothing to be seen. The country, even at this season, is not free
from malaria. Several peasants suffering from intermittent fever
applied to me for relief. Some I saw wretchedly ill, lying on their
angoureebs, without any advice, or, apparently, any person to attend
them, left to live or die according to the violence of the attack or
the strength of their constitutions. When the rains extend to this
place, which is not always the case, fevers are very prevalent:
dysentery also is very common: I have had an attack myself, and
two of my servants suffered severely from it. I used successfully a
powerful dose of opium and calomel. To my servant, who was very ill,
I gave six grains of calomel and one of opium at a time.
Once a week, in each of these small towns and villages, there is a
bazaar; a curious scene, on account of the different costumes of the
Arabs who resort to them from the country. At Metammah many of the
inhabitants have adopted the fashion of their conquerors, and shaved
their heads. The costumes of some of the women of high rank are said
to be very beautiful, but it is difficult to obtain a sight of them;
and I must confess I have not enjoyed that good fortune. My dragoman,
however, an impudent fellow, contrived, upon some pretext, to enter
the harem of the present melek of Shendy, whose wife is daughter
of the celebrated Nimr, who murdered Ismael Pasha. Her husband has
gone to the war with Hourshid Bey. The intruder found this queen,
as he called her, in a large room reposing in a most dignified
manner on a beautiful angoureeb, covered with the fine mats of the
country. She was reclining at full length; her head was supported by
a wooden pillow of about the width of a hoop, and of a semicircular
form to admit the head, and sustained by a column 4 to 6 inches high
with a broad flat base, [Symbol]. They are almost exactly similar to
those often found in the ancient tombs of the Egyptians, and which,
notwithstanding their apparent discomfort, are now very generally used
in every part of Upper Nubia. The ladies of Shendy, however, value
them highly, since, being so narrow, they do not disarrange their
hair; a serious consideration, if it be true, as I am informed, that
the _coiffure_ of the Shendyan beauties requires nine hours’ work
to be quite _comme il faut_. This lady’s hair was very curiously
dressed, beautifully plaited, and bushy at each side, projecting
behind and flat above the forehead. On this flat part were two plates
of gold, one above the other, and in the centre of her forehead was
a large gold ring. She wore two handsome gold earrings, and bracelets
of massive gold on her arms, and the same above her ankles. She wore
the cotton dress of the country, but finer than usual, and over her
neck was a beautiful shawl of Souakim with a broad silk border. He
represented her features as being extremely small and delicate; her
eyes very large and fine, and her complexion much fairer than that
of the women of the country in general. He described her as the most
beautiful woman he had seen since leaving Cairo, and doubted if,
in his life, he had observed any one superior to her. She looked,
he said, like a queen.
In a circle, squatted on the ground beneath, were about twenty
female slaves, some very beautiful, busily employed in pounding and
preparing spices for the ointment with which they perfume their
persons and soften their skins. Her nails were extremely long;
a decided indication, in this country, of high rank, as proving
that the person never condescends to employ her fingers in any
work. To promote their growth, they are held over small fires of
cedar wood. This is an ancient custom, and Cailliaud mentions having
observed, at Naga, a representation of a queen with long nails;
and it still prevails among the Chinese of the highest rank. This
wife, or queen, of the melek, possesses a large fortune, said to
amount to 50,000_l._ sterling; an enormous amount for a country
like this. She increases it daily by commerce, keeping constantly
in her employ Arab merchants, who trade in caravans on her account
to Abyssinia, Kordofan, Sennaar, and Cairo. Their chief traffic now
is in slaves. Two of her merchants were in the room when my dragoman
entered. She eyed him at first fiercely and haughtily, and asked him
whether he was one of the Christians just arrived, and how he dared
to enter there? Being a clever insinuating fellow, with the advantage
of being a Mahometan, he soon ingratiated himself into her favour,
and had some dinner ordered for him. As she was the first queen he
had ever seen, and the daughter of the celebrated Nimr, he examined
her very attentively. The reader will perhaps be dissatisfied with
a description thus given upon hearsay; but I should state that,
from numerous enquiries, I have found it perfectly applicable to the
great ladies in this country; and my dragoman, although an Arab, is
the most intelligent clever servant I have met with any where. The
account of this great lady may remind the reader of Bruce’s Sittina.
_March_ 14. We started this morning at noon; and now, thank Heaven,
my face is toward the north, and every day will bring me nearer
England. I have still a journey of nearly 1600 miles before I even
reach Alexandria, with deserts to pass and hardships to undergo.[23]
We have suffered already very severely from heat and fatigue. For
some time past the thermometer, between eleven and four, has been
96° to 100° in the shade; on one day as high as 104°, and another,
110°. The wind blows almost every day very strong from the north;
but in the interior deserts of Africa, the atmosphere soon becomes so
heated, by the scorching sun, that the wind which, in other regions,
braces and invigorates man, is felt as hot and oppressive. It is
refreshing at night, and near the river; but in the desert, for a
great part of the day, almost insupportable. Our umbrellas, with
which we sheltered ourselves from the sun, have been all broken by
the wind, and others we had constructed met to-day a similar fate;
but we protect ourselves with our sheets as well as we can. There is
no apparent ascent from the Nile into the desert. After five hours’
journey we encamped for the night. The desert is slightly covered
with sand, but not so much as to impede the camels: in other respects
it almost resembles a park, covered, to a great extent, with trees
and herbage, though the latter has rather a burnt appearance. The
trees are chiefly acacias, bearing full yellow flowers, and in their
forms sometimes resembling small oaks, others the tops of the Italian
pine trees.
_March_ 16. We have been ten hours _en route_ this day. As we
advanced into the desert, I observed not quite so many trees,
and also less herbage. After five hours’ journey—that is,
ten after leaving the Nile—we arrived at a spot called Aboulay,
where numerous wells occur. The Arabs filled their water-skins; and,
had I not been well provided from the Nile, I should have drunk of
it without hesitation, as it seemed tolerably sweet and wholesome.
On this journey I could not escape from some serious and even
painful reflections. However the traveller may be fascinated with
this kind of life,—free from the restraints and passions of the
world; living in the patriarchal style; mounted on his dromedary;
sleeping under a tent, and sometimes without one; covered with no
other canopy than the blue sky;—exquisite as may be the pleasure of
exploring unfrequented lands, treading unbeaten paths, and leading his
caravan over these terrible wildernesses; still, there are thoughts,
not to be resisted, which crowd upon the mind, and unnerve even the
strongest. This is not the land of our birth; we are strangers to
the customs, manners, language, and religion of the people: their
hospitality and civility are merely the effort of their benevolence,
and the performance of a duty. No tie of relationship, no chain of
affection, no sympathy of ideas, no bond of union, exists between
us. The dissimilarity of our colour, of the climate and aspect of
the country, as compared with ours, is not more complete than that
of our habits and feelings. All that we love, all that we care
for, is separated from us by immense tracts of desert sands; and
we have to pass rivers, seas, and several thousand miles before we
reach the land of our home. I can also assure my fair countrywomen
that it is no trifling deprivation to see and converse with none
but these swarthy savage beauties, from whose society no man of any
refinement can derive the slightest gratification. My Italian artist,
who sings remarkably well, entertains me sometimes with the favourite
airs from Rossini’s and Bellini’s operas, and he talks to me so
much of “la bella Italia,” that I long to be again there—_but
on my way to England_.
My camel-drivers, with the exception of two Ababdes, whom I met and
engaged as they had passed the Nubian desert with me, are of the
tribe of the Shageea—fine tall warlike-looking fellows, with their
hair dressed almost like the Ababdes; but the Shageea generally wear
beards and mustachios. Their complexion is decidedly darker than that
of the Ababdes, which is a dark brown; but theirs is a darker brown,
and sometimes approaches almost to a black, but still very different
from the cold colour of the negroes. The Shageea have occasionally
wider nostrils than we should think correct, and rather thick lips,
otherwise their features would resemble exactly the European. We
have seen numbers of gazelles, and several flocks of sheep, and
passed many isolated hills: the sand is firm, and not fatiguing for
the camels. Six inches below the surface is sandstone rock.
_March_ 17. We have been ten hours on the road. Had it not been
for the extreme heat, and my health being indifferent, I should have
enjoyed my journey through this desert; for, although not picturesque,
the abundance of acacias makes it extremely beautiful. We have passed
several isolated hills; and on the sand yesterday, as well as to-day,
I observed many of the round balls of iron-flint, or iron-glance,
sometimes of a red, but generally of almost a black, colour. A
distinguished mineralogist has informed me that they are common sand,
agglutinated by oxide of iron, such as may be seen on Hampstead Heath,
&c., rolled by water. They are similar to those observed during my
first two or three days’ journey in the great Nubian desert.
_March_ 18. After four hours’ ride I arrived at a range of
mountains, the crust of which consists of quartz and decomposed
granite; but the basis of most of the rocks in this quarter is
sandstone. At a distance I fancied we were approaching a passage cut
through the mountains; but on arriving it proved a deep recess in
the rock, having the appearance of being worn by a torrent, and now
forming a well, or rather cistern, almost entirely protected from
the rays of the sun by a projecting rock. During the winter, and
when the tropical rains extend so far north, the water is above five
times its present depth, which is only eight feet. It is now green,
and disagreeable to the taste; but, fortunately, my stock of Nile
water is not finished, as I must confess I should not have relished
to quench my thirst, under a burning sun, with this beverage. My
satisfaction was the greater when I observed that my camel-drivers,
when they had filled their water-skins, bathed and washed themselves
in the pool; doubtless the usual custom of the caravans. We expected
to find flocks here, and procure an additional supply of meat. My
artist being extremely unwell, and wishing for soup, I gave a
backsheesh of ten piastres to one of the camel-men, who mounted
an unloaded dromedary, and went out of the road, towards the west,
to a source of water, where he said there were Arabs of the tribe
of the Hassanyeh: he joined us after three hours, having succeeded
in purchasing a goat for five, and an excellent gazelle for two,
piastres. We have seen numerous herds, of five or six each, of the
latter, but have never been able to approach within shot of them. At
a short distance from hence, they tell me that there are antelopes
(Arabic, _buggera el Atmoor_). It is singular that, on this side of
the river, ferocious animals are rare. There are some few hyenas, but
the panthers and lions seem confined chiefly to the Island of Meroe.
This reservoir of water, called Gagdool, is out of the direct road;
we went from it due west for a short time, and then resumed our course
towards the north-west. I should have made a drawing of these rocks,
but I was really so unwell that I felt unequal to the exertion. At
noon we reposed for a short time under our tent. There are abundance
of acacias, but they afford little shade; whence the Arab proverb,
“The friendship of man is like the shade of the acacia.” At Shendy
I bought a splendid greyhound dog; perhaps of a larger species than
ours, stronger, and with more bone, but showing much breeding. I was
surprised to find the true race of greyhound dog in the centre of
Africa; but, in fact, there is a representation of it on the walls
of a tomb at Thebes, forming part of magnificent offerings received
from Ethiopia. (See Plate XLVI.) I should have been glad to have
brought him to England, but he died in consequence of the heat,
added to his fatigue in following the camel, and perhaps not having
sufficient water, although I spared him as much as I could out of my
own individual stock[24], in order that I might save him. I placed
him on the back of a camel; but he would not remain.
_March_ 19. Nine hours this day. We arrived at eleven at a well,
in a valley at the commencement of a range of granite rocks of the
usual round formation by which they are always known: quartz nodules
were scattered in the valley. The water of this well is the best we
have tasted since we left the Nile, yet not what I should like to
drink. The Arabs say that we shall arrive at a better to-morrow. The
source is called Magaga. We encamped earlier than usual this evening,
my artist being unable to go any farther. Last night he had a severe
attack of bilious fever. Calomel is the best remedy for that complaint
in this climate. I gave him a dose of six grains, and this morning
he was wonderfully better, but the fatigue and heat of the day have
brought on a relapse. He wants spirit to assist in throwing off the
disease, is afraid of dying in the desert, and thinks it impossible
he shall live to see the Nile again. He fancies that without plenty
of sustenance he cannot exist; and therefore forces his appetite,
instead of living abstemiously, as he ought. I have given him six
grains more this evening, but have found great difficulty in inducing
him to take them, although he is sensible of the benefit he derived
from the others. I am exceedingly anxious about the effect of the
medicine, from the responsibility I feel in having brought him into
the deserts. His reproaches on the subject are harassing, although
unjust; for he was engaged under the condition of making this journey.
_March_ 20. My artist was exceedingly ill the early part of last
night, but at last he fell into a profuse perspiration, after which
he dropped asleep, and awoke this morning quite relieved. He allows
a certain merit to the pills, but much more to his having vowed
to present wax candles to the Madonna on his return to Italy:
he has made other promises of the same kind for deliverance from
various dangers. An hour after starting this morning, we arrived at
a well called Haless, situated, like the one we passed yesterday,
in a valley. The water is most delicious, quite equal to that of
the Nile. We emptied all our geerbahs of the water they contained,
which, from the extreme heat, had become black and bad, and filled
them from this delicious fountain. I never enjoyed any luxury so
much as this cold, clear, fresh draught.
We encamped after nine hours’ ride. Although the scenery is
not sufficiently bold to be termed picturesque, it is impossible
to conceive a more beautiful desert; valleys and rocks with
mountains, whose forms are varied, broken, sometimes conical, but
never monotonous. The low grounds are covered with sweet-smelling
acacias. The herbage has certainly, at this season, a very burnt
appearance; but had there been a greensward, instead of these yellow
sands and this long discoloured grass, few spots would be more lovely
than the Desert of Bahiouda.
_March_ 21. We rode ten hours to-day. The plains are rather more
extensive, but still beautiful. We met, this morning, shepherd boys
with geerbahs on their arms, containing their provision of water, and
they had a few loaves of dourah bread tied in their garment. In this
way they conduct their flocks to the pasturages distant from the well,
and return when their stock of provision is consumed. I observed,
several times, this morning, traces of torrents. The mountains in this
desert are generally of grey and pink-coloured granite, often of the
description called syenite; many are of sandstone, hornblende, and
conglomerates; while others are of decomposed granite and decomposed
felspar. At eleven o’clock we passed a well of good water called
Hennek, now forty feet deep and proportionally wide. There are no
traces of its being recently excavated, nor any thing to mark it
as ancient, but it is too great an undertaking for the Arabs of the
present age to have accomplished. We are encamped near another source
of rain water, called Prasoli. There are about twenty houses or sheds
scattered around, inhabited by peasants and their flocks. We have
met two caravans of merchants from Dongolah. The manner the Shageea
salute, leaning their right arms over the breasts and shoulders
of each other, has a very dignified and noble appearance, and is
quite in harmony with that frank sincerity and honest affection,
which characterise the Arabs of the desert.
_March_ 22. We set out, as usual, at seven, and, at twelve o’clock
of the eighth day from Metammah, arrived again at the river. A short
distance from the Nile, in a wild solitary situation, we passed some
fine ruins of a large Coptic church. It is built of stone covered with
cement. There are several windows, and naves in the interior. There
are also several doors, and over them the Maltese cross. At the
top of the building are remains of an Egyptian cornice and beading,
but the plan of the interior is evidently that of a church. It was
built, probably, of the materials of a temple, of which the peasants
inform me that the traces were recently visible, but are now entirely
buried by the encroaching sands of the desert. I went to the place
where it was said to have existed, but could find no vestiges of
it. We were detained some time on the south side of the Nile, but,
after firing repeatedly, a boat came over for us.
Immediately on arriving at the town of Meroueh, I paid a visit to
the katshef who has the command of this district. I found him very
anxious to be of service to us; and his assistance was most useful
in enabling me to procure a fresh supply of bread; a thing difficult
to be had in a country where very little of any grain except dourah
is either raised or eaten. I was fortunate in obtaining as much
rice as I was in need of from the soldiers, who were very willing
to sell their rations. Our sugar and tea is consumed: the latter,
of course, is not to be procured in such a region as this. In this
village, or rather little capital of the province of Dar Shageea,
and in the country around, we could only find one loaf of sugar,
which was black, and the owner made me pay ten times its value.
We left the camels, which brought us across the desert, on the
other side of the river: we, therefore, cannot go on to Gibel el
Birkel this evening, since no other camels can be found to carry
the luggage. As the distance is more than an hour’s walk, I have
not time to go and return before dark, and am therefore obliged to
restrain my curiosity until to-morrow.
Meroueh is an ill-built miserable place. In the fortress where the
katshef resides, and which formerly belonged to Melek Shoush, is a
pedestal of basalt, on which are two ovals, with names and titles
on them, which I could not copy, on account of the accumulation of
filth that covered them. I had it washed, and traced sufficient of
the hieroglyphics to perceive that the name is the same as that of
an Ethiopian king I afterwards found on the great temple at Gibel el
Birkel. In the court of the same castle is a fragment of a statue of
the same material, the sculpture of which is good. The coincidence
between the modern name of Meroueh and the ancient capital Meroe
is curious. Was this the commencement of the kingdom of which Meroe
was the metropolis?
CHAPTER XI.
ANTIQUITIES OF GIBEL EL BIRKEL. — DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE
MOUNTAIN. — TEMPLE BUILT BY THE TIRHAKA OF THE BIBLE. — VARIOUS
OTHER INTERESTING REMAINS AND TEMPLES. — PYRAMIDS. — CIRCULAR
AND POINTED ARCH INVENTED IN ETHIOPIA.
Gibel el Birkel is situated an hour’s walk, or three miles and a
half, to the east of the small town of Meroueh, and the mountain is
5150 feet distant from the Nile. It is an insulated hill, situated in
a large plain; and below it, on the south side, are the ruins, also
the cultivated land and the river. The other sides of the mountain
are bordered by the desert, which has, no doubt, made encroachments
on what was once cultivated land. The height of the eminence is about
350 feet. The exterior is rough, part of it having been worked to
furnish materials for the temples, and more recently large masses
have fallen, and almost entirely buried two temples which were
situated beneath. The hill is of sandstone, of a soft description,
which accounts for the dilapidated state of all the remains; for
not only would the influence of time and the seasons be greater,
but the difficulty would, of course, be less in destroying them. In
some parts, the mountain is nearly perpendicular: the form is very
picturesque, and highly imposing, particularly at a distance.
My general view (Plate XVIII.), drawn by myself with the camera
lucida, will give a correct idea of the site of the ancient city;
but it differs so much from the view Cailliaud has published, that
it will scarcely be recognised as the same place; and, indeed,
nearly all our plans and drawings are equally dissimilar. I can
only state, that neither time nor pains were spared, either by my
artist or myself, to render ours as accurate as possible. The total
circumference of the mountain (see Plate XVII.) is about 5000 feet,
which may be divided thus:—
Feet.
From the temple of Isis or Typhonium to the temple
destroyed by the mountain 400
From the latter to the Grand Temple 100
To the point where the mountain takes a direction
almost to the north, passing the traces of the town,
which extends for 500 feet 600
Direction towards the north 700
Ditto towards the north-west 1100
Ditto towards the south-west 100
Ditto nearly south 2000
----
5000
----
[Illustration: Pl. 17.
_From a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr. & L. Bandoni._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
The form of the eminence is not very unlike that of the Acropolis
of Athens, but there certainly never was any fortification on this
rock. Some broken pottery and bricks, on the eastern side, indicate
the site of the town. On the opposite, or western side of the
mountain, but more in the desert, are two groups of pyramids. One
consists of nine, the other, still farther in the desert, of
eight. They are surrounded by sand, on the surface of which great
quantities of quartz pebbles are disseminated.
Besides the two temples, mentioned as having been destroyed by the
falling of a part of the mountain, there are the remains of eight
other edifices, principally temples. The one I first arrived at,
situated at the south-west corner of the mountain, is perhaps the
most interesting of all. (See Plate XIX.)
I admired exceedingly the beautiful and picturesque form of Gibel el
Birkel; but the ruins in the distance, scattered beneath the southern
side of the mountain, excited to the greatest degree my curiosity. I
felt, indeed, that I was undoubtedly approaching the site of the
capital of a formerly rich and flourishing region. The situation
at once announces it, and the magnificent remains bear testimony to
its importance, and, I may truly add, to the taste, knowledge, and
refinement of the ancient inhabitants of this now deserted city. Plate
XX. is a view of the ruins which first engaged my attention. It shows
the remaining fragment of the propylon, and the manner in which
the columns forming the first court were ornamented. The head of
Isis adorns the eastern and western sides of the columns, fronting
the avenue and enclosure, where they would be seen conspicuously,
but the other two sides have merely the lotus flower; an economy of
sculpture never seen in Egyptian edifices. This drawing also shows
the entrance into the chambers which were excavated out of the
rock. Plate XIX. is the best point of view that I could fix upon,
and indeed a better could not be desired, as it shows seven columns,
ornamented with the capitals of the head of Athor, which are all that
remain; and it also comprises the only Typhonian pillar that is now
entire in the portico. My drawings will, I trust, give the reader
a full idea of the imposing appearance of these ruins. I will now
enter into a more detailed architectural description of this temple,
of which we have given the plan and section, Plates XXI. and XXII.
The length of this temple is 115 feet 6 inches, the breadth (in the
interior) 50 feet 2 inches. The pylon is almost entirely destroyed,
but sufficient is left to prove that its depth was 11 feet 3 inches,
and total width 62 feet 6 inches: there are no remains of the
entrance into this portico, but I have restored it according to
the usual form. This pylon leads into a portico 59 feet long and
50 feet 2 inches wide. I know not why Cailliaud and others have
made two rooms of this portico, and a difference in the diameter of
the columns. My artist had sufficient time to make the plan, which,
with the section, were drawn out, as I give them, on the spot. This
was our habitation, and in my examination of the ruins I did not
see any authority to induce me to suppose that there had been two
apartments. All the columns were so easily traced, that the plan,
with the exception of the propylon, may be considered entire.
[Illustration: Pl. 18.
_On stone by W. Walton, from a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
GENERAL VIEW OF GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
This portico consists of two rows of seven columns each, and two rows
of the same number of square pillars. The latter form the centre
avenue, while the columns are arranged between the pillars and
exterior wall. The centre rows, forming the avenue into the temple,
are ornamented on the side fronting the avenue with figures of the
deformed Pthah, or what is generally called Typhon, above which
is a capital, decorated with representations of the lotus flower,
supporting ovals; between the latter are branches of palm trees. One
of these pillars remains entire, and the traces of the others
are visible. Behind them are circular columns, with the capitals
of the head of Athor, above which is the common representation of
the monolithic temple with the serpent and globe. On the reverse is
the same. The sides are decorated (as I have said in my description
of Plate XX.) with the lotus flower, instead of the head of Athor,
above which are similar monolithic temples. The sculpture of these
heads of Isis is tolerable (see Plate XIX.), but not so bold as on
the pillars at Naga. The diameter of the columns is 3 feet 6 inches;
their total height 17 feet 6 inches, including the bases. The shaft
of the column, consisting of five pieces, measures 9 feet. The head
of Athor 3 feet 4 inches, the monolithic temple 4 feet 6 inches. The
diameter of the Typhonian pillars is 4 feet 3 inches. The columns
with the Athor-headed capital rest on circular bases, 4 feet in
diameter, and 8 inches high; the figures of Typhon are 12 feet 4
inches high; the total height of the pillar 17 feet. The height of
the legs of this figure is 4 feet 6 inches; the length of the body
from the shoulder to its legs 6 feet; the head is 3 feet 8 inches
long; making in all 14 feet 2 inches. The difference from the total
height of the statue, which is only 12 feet 4 inches, is accounted
for by the circumstance of the head of the monster reaching over
its breast, the shoulders being nearly on a level with its ears,
while its belly hangs down between its legs.
The side walls of the temple seem never to have been above 5 feet
6 inches high, as may be observed in the section. Besides the wall
not being broken, the circumstance of the capitals of the columns
being ornamented, on the sides fronting the wall, with the heads
of Isis, whilst on the north and south sides the architect did
not take the trouble thus to decorate them, proves that, from the
lowness of the wall, such an ornament was there quite requisite. The
circumstance, also, of the sides of the column towards the centre
avenue being in a great measure concealed by the Typhonian figures,
would suggest the idea of this variation from the general plan, and
induce them to erect only a low wall, in order that the columns with
the Athor-headed capital might be visible. This portico leads into a
room excavated out of the rock, ornamented with two figures of Typhon:
the height of these, including a kind of basket above their heads,
and plinths (see section), is 12 feet 4 inches. The sides of this
room are ornamented with sculpture, representing the king Tirhaka,
and his beautiful and royal bride Amentikatah, making offerings and
libations to the god Amun Ra, Lord of the Rulers, with the head-dress
of a large globe and two feathers; behind whom is Maut, with a plain
helmet on her head. On the opposite side the king, with the titles,
God beneficent, Lord of the World, Beneficent King, Son of Phre
(Pharaoh), is offering vases to the divinity Io, whose head-dress
consists of four plain feathers. She has the jackal-headed staff in
one hand, and in the other the _crux ansatus_. Behind this divinity
is a representation of Koht, with the head of a lioness, sustaining
a globe. I have copied the hieroglyphics, as also the dedicatory
inscription around the room.
On the columns of the portico scarcely any hieroglyphics are legible;
those few that are so I have copied. The room last described leads
into the sanctuary, also excavated out of the rock. It is 22 feet
10 inches long, by 12 feet 8 inches broad, and is ornamented with
sculpture, representing the king making offerings to the divinities,
with the attributes of Amun Ra, Neith, Honsoo, Horus, Kneph, and
Thoth. On the west side of the sanctuary is another excavated room,
22 feet 10 inches long, and 7 feet 6 inches wide. This is also
ornamented with sculpture, much broken, representing the king making
offerings to Kneph, Thoth, and Horus.
[Illustration: Pl. 19.
_On stone by C. Hullmandel, from a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
TEMPLE OF TIRHAKA, GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
On the east side of the sanctuary are two rooms, the first 17 feet
long by 7 feet 7 inches wide. The sculpture represents the king, with
the attributes and titles of Thoth, addressing numerous divinities
seated, all with the same figure of a mummy and a jackal-headed staff
in their hands. Before the first is a pedestal with a lotus flower
upon it. The second room, leading out of the last I have described,
is unfinished, and is only 5 feet long and 7 feet wide. The plan
will show that the rooms on each side the sanctuary have no direct
communication with the latter, but lead out of the first excavated
chamber.
This is not only the most curious of all the temples of Gibel el
Birkel, four of the chambers being excavated out of the rock; but
it is also in every respect the most picturesque and interesting,
particularly from being in the best preservation. Though an
excavation, it is apparently not very ancient.[25] I found no other
name upon it than that of Tirhaka, which is found on the columns
of the portico, and also in the interior. This is the Pharaoh, as
will be seen by the Historical Appendix, who assisted Hezekiah in
his war against Sennacherib. In clearing out the stones and rubbish
from the sanctuary, to make it a more comfortable residence, I made
the curious discovery of a gutter, 4 inches deep and 9 inches broad,
which crosses the ancient stone floor. It was probably to receive
the blood of the sacrifices.
The sculpture of this temple has not the striking characteristics
of the true Ethiopian style; it more resembles the Egyptian, and
is good, though by no means the best. It is not improbable that
this Ethiopian dynasty, being possessed also of Egypt, introduced
into their own country a taste for the improved style of Egyptian
sculpture. Ages must have elapsed before the Ethiopian manner could
have changed to one so entirely different as this is.
The next ruin I arrived at is marked D in the plan, and is nearly
300 feet distant from the Typhonium. This space of 300 feet between
the two temples is covered with ruined fragments, doubtless part
of the city. The temple D is not remarkable for architectural
beauty. It is much injured, and the sculpture and hieroglyphics
which ornamented the interior are quite defaced; scarcely a vestige
of the latter remaining to tell that they existed. The plan of the
temple may be distinctly traced. It consisted only of two rooms:
the first ornamented with four columns; the second is the sanctuary,
in which is a plain stone for an altar: the length of the edifice
is 85 feet, and the width 65. I saw no reason to suppose that it
ever had an additional portico in front. The defaced state of the
hieroglyphics and sculpture is no proof, in this instance, of its
great antiquity, but may be accounted for by the peculiar softness
of the stone. Close or adjoining to this temple, on the east side,
are some walls and columns of other edifices (E in the plan); but,
from what remains, little, I think, would be gained by an excavation,
as there are no hieroglyphics.
At 125 feet to the north, that is, behind the last-described ruins,
are the remains of the propylon of a small temple. (See the foreground
of Plate XXIII., and to the right, in the distance, of Plate XXV.) Its
south side is ornamented with sculpture, representing the king
sacrificing prisoners to Amun; a subject so often repeated on the
propylons of Egypt. The other side of the propylon is also ornamented
with sculpture. (See Plate XXIII.) It represents a sphinx on a
pedestal, under which is a figure with feathers, and also a pedestal
with some vases. I copied the hieroglyphics which were legible. They
contain the name and titles of a king called Amun Sekon. The upper
part of the oval, on the south side of the propylon, is destroyed;
but on the north, where it is perfect, it seems to be _Strength of
Amun Sekon_. The similarity of the name Sekon and Sethus, the first
of the nineteenth dynasty, is curious. The hieroglyphics above the
sphinx seem to allude to the offering of an obelisk to the king, and
the inscription above the vases states their number to be forty. The
width of this temple is 60 feet. The _sekos_ has been destroyed by
the falling of part of the mountain; and another temple, C, close
adjoining, has suffered in a similar manner. Of the latter still
slighter traces remain: a few fragments of columns and part of a
wall alone indicate that it ever existed.
[Illustration: Pl. 20.
_On stone by C. Hullmandel, from a Drawing by L. Bandoni Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
TEMPLE BUILT BY TIRHAKA, GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
_Great Temple at Gibel el Birkel._—The temple I next arrived at, 75
feet from the latter, marked F in the plan, had attracted my attention
on first arriving at the mountain. It is now little more than an
immense confused pile of ruins. One column only remains entire;
having the capital of the form of the lotus-bud; denoting its epoch,
not only by its style, but by the name still legible on the slab
of the capital. Of the vast number of columns which ornamented the
porticoes, vestibules, and apartments of this enormous edifice, one
only remains; a sad relic of departed splendour: and this, defaced,
tottering, and almost bent with age, cannot long answer the purpose
of transmitting to posterity the name of its royal founder. It
seems almost by a miracle to have survived the ruin which surrounds
it: and we may congratulate ourselves on this circumstance; for,
if it had fallen a generation earlier, the fragments would have
been swallowed up by the desert or carried away by the Arabs; and,
consequently, the style of the architecture, and the name of the
king who, perhaps, built this splendid edifice, would have remained
wrapped in impenetrable mystery.
Few temples in Egypt are more extensive or finer than this must
once have been. Sufficient still remains to show its extent
and magnificence: traces of columns, fragments of battle-scenes,
and sacred processions, display its _architectural_ beauty and the
interesting historical events which once adorned its walls. The cruel
hand of time, some convulsion of nature, or, what is most probable,
the barbarous hand of man, have destroyed them, and thus torn many
interesting pages from the history of the world.
A general view of these ruins may be seen in the background of Plate
XXIII., which gives a correct idea of the confused mass that now
remains; and my view (Plate XXV.), the most picturesque of any that
I have of Gibel el Birkel, represents in the foreground the solitary
column before mentioned. The separate plan (Plate XXIV.) of this
temple I drew myself, and spared no pains to make it as correct as
possible, excavating for that purpose: and had I been less acquainted
with Egyptian edifices, I could not have succeeded so well. The
exact form of the first propylon of this temple is not discernible,
being quite destroyed, great part of the stones carried away, and the
rest covered almost entirely with the sand which drifts continually
from the desert. The dimensions given to the propylon in the plan,
I obtained by some little excavation, and by observations of the
ground. I do not pretend to say they are quite correct; but, from the
dilapidated state of this part of the temple, more exact measurements
cannot, I think, now be obtained. To understand fully the following
detailed description of this edifice, the reader must refer to my
plan. The total length of the temple is nearly 500 feet. The first
court is 150 feet long, and 135 wide, and was surrounded by a row
of columns, 5 feet 9 inches in diameter, resting on bases 7 feet 6
inches in diameter. Nine only of these columns are now visible. These,
however, are sufficient to afford a correct idea of what the court
has been. I obtained the intercolumniation by excavation, and have
thus ascertained that this court must have been ornamented with 26
columns, and not more, as it has been represented. There were nine
on each side, including the angles, and four at each end.
[Illustration: Pl. 21.
_Drawn by L. Bandoni._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
TEMPLE OF TIRHAKA, GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_London. Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
The propylon of the second court is also much injured, but not to
the same extent as the first. On the south-west side, which is less
injured than the other, I found the remains of a staircase leading
to the top of the edifice. The depth of this propylon, which is 28
feet, I was able to ascertain with more precision than the other. The
second court is 125 feet long and 102 wide. It was curiously laid
out, in a manner which first made me conceive it to have originally
formed two rooms: the first containing four rows of six columns each,
two on each side; and the second room, six rows of columns of three
each: but, on further examination, I found that there was no mark
on the side walls of its having been thus divided. There is a thin
wall, which connects together the seventh and eighth columns of the
centre avenue, that is, the last of the columns that would have
been in the first room, and the first of the second. This proves
that this could never have formed more than one court; for, had it
been divided into separate rooms, these columns could not have been
connected. I conceive it most probable that, as the architectural
part of a temple was generally constructed before the ornamental,
the columns may have been erected with the intention that it should
have been divided into two rooms; but that afterwards, as the making
the whole one apartment formed no very great architectural defect,
though it certainly was one, this arrangement was adopted, probably
in order to afford a more continued space for the procession which
adorned the walls. Otherwise, rooms leading into the sanctuaries,
ornamented with six rows of columns, of three each, agree exactly
with the general description of an Egyptian temple.
With some little excavation, I found the traces of all the columns
marked in the plan on the western side, and two on the other, with
a similar connecting wall above mentioned: the width of the centre
avenue was 17 feet. The diameter of the columns is 5 feet 5 inches;
and they rest on circular bases. A reference to the plan will show
that the nine columns on each side, forming the centre avenue, are in
an exact line. The six columns of the second row, on entering, are
in a line with the intercolumniation of the second and third rows,
of what I, at first, erroneously conceived to be a separate portico.
On the west side of the second propylon are the fragments of a
battle-scene, now almost unintelligible. Shattered pieces of a
warhorse, of a king drawing his bow, and of slain combatants, denote
that the historical representation of some celebrated conflict has
been sculptured there. The side walls of this court seem to have
been covered with splendid processions, perhaps equal to that in
the beautiful portico at Medenet Abou; but nothing remains, except,
in one place, a few heads; in another, the hawk and jackal standards,
and several fragments of feet and limbs; and here and there, one or
two hieroglyphics occur. I regret exceedingly that these sculptures
are so completely destroyed, as, doubtless, they would have made
an interesting addition to the pages of history. The battle, with
its horrors—the resistance, flight, and slaughter—the fiery
steed, trampling on the dying—the portraits and the names of the
vanquished people—the warrior’s triumph and gratitude to the
gods, and the processions in commemoration of his victory—were,
no doubt, sculptured on these walls. This once beautiful temple,
and the historical records with which it was adorned, are now almost
entirely destroyed. Sufficient only is remaining to prove the beauty
of the style, and make us sensible of the loss we have experienced
in its destruction. The nature of the event these sculptures told,
may be imagined; but as matter of history it is lost for ever.
[Illustration: Pl. 22.
_From a Drawing by L. Bandoni._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
TEMPLE partly excavated out of the Rock GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
The next room is 51 feet long and 56 feet wide, and was ornamented
with a row of five columns on each side, the diameter of which is
4 feet 2 inches, and they rest on circular bases: the latter are
on pedestals. On each side of this room was a gallery, in one of
which there now remain two columns. It seems to me probable, from
the space between the last-described room and the sanctuary (see
Plan), that a gallery crossed the temple at the end of the third
room, out of which there were probably three outlets. Those at the
sides would lead into small chapels, and the centre one into the
sanctuary. As I have no authority, however, for this supposition,
I have not marked it in my plan; but the reader who has studied the
construction of Egyptian edifices will perceive its probability.
The sanctuary is, fortunately, in better preservation: its width
is about 16 feet, the length uncertain. The wall which enclosed it
could only have been of a certain height, perhaps a few feet, as,
immediately behind it, on each side, are four columns, the diameter of
which is 4 feet. Near the extremity of the sanctuary is a beautiful
granite altar, which I found almost entirely covered with rubbish,
and got it cleared. The device is very elegant, representing four
kings, or, rather, four representations of the same king, Tirhaka,
supporting the Egyptian entablature; and the base of the altar is
also tastefully ornamented. Between the figures are four ovals: two
containing the phonetic name of Tirhaka, accompanied with the titles
of Son of Phre, or Pharaoh, the Sun, always living. The other two
ovals contain the prænomen of the king Sun, very beneficent; above
which is the title King, and below it the hieroglyphics signifying
eternal life, or always living. There is a line of hieroglyphics round
the figures, containing a dedication of the buildings to his father
Amun Ra, &c. On the east side is a subject, not uncommon in Egypt,
of the two divinities of the Nile, supporting with cords a pedestal,
over which is the name of the king. I copied the hieroglyphics of
this tablet. On the west side of the altar is a subject exactly
similar to the east, but very much defaced and broken.[26] Behind
the sanctuary is a room or inner sanctuary, 37 feet long by 21 feet
6 inches wide. A door leads out of it, on the western side, into two
small rooms. To the west of the altar, before described, is a much
larger one of basalt, 8 feet 6 inches square. There are no figures
on this altar, but some hieroglyphics, all of which I have copied:
they contain the name and titles of King Pepi, or, as Rossellini,
perhaps more correctly, calls him, Pionchei. The name of this king
I found also on the walls; but, on the capital of the column which
is still remaining there is an oval almost resembling the prænomen
of Amunneith, or, according to Mr. Wilkinson, Amun m gori III. If
it be the same, I must candidly state that this is very probably an
Egyptian, and not an Ethiopian, edifice; for the name on the columns
is generally that of the builder of the temple. There are other rooms
(as will be seen by my plan), which I have not attempted to describe,
being almost quite unintelligible.
The appearance of this temple, at a distance, is very picturesque;
but there is little in the detail to interest the traveller; its
architectural ornaments and sculpture being entirely destroyed,
except the one column already mentioned, and it, too, is considerably
injured, and off the perpendicular. To the architect, this temple
is interesting, as its plan can almost be fully traced. The mere
painter, seeking only the picturesque, would find few advantageous
points of view. But to me these ruins were deeply interesting, since,
accustomed as I am to Egyptian edifices, I found sufficient, even in
the little that remains, to understand perfectly what it has been. I
easily restored, in my conception, the lofty propylons, the splendid
courts, surrounded with the most chaste forms of Egyptian columns;
the porticoes, sanctuaries, statues, and avenues of sphinxes;—every
part enriched by the art of the painter and sculptor;—the walls and
propylons covered with the representations of mythological mysteries,
military exploits, and animated battle-scenes, which form the _chefs
d’œuvre_ of Egyptian art. I could trace, also, the portraits of the
heroes, hieroglyphical tablets, containing the history of the scenes,
and displaying the king’s piety and munificence in his offerings to
the gods. Thus, I restored the temple in my imagination; and, indeed,
there was good authority for all that I have enumerated. Were I to
refer to a period still more remote, and, filling up the vague, and
not sufficiently explicit authority of the historians, describe the
bronze, gold, silver, ivory, ebony, and precious stones, with which
it was, perhaps, adorned; the Oriental magnificence which was most
probably displayed; the mysterious ceremonies of the most mysterious
of religions; the sacrifices and burnt-offerings; the deceiving
oracles, the crafty priesthood, and the ignorant multitude gazing,
with superstitious awe, at their imposing functions,—I might then
be accused of rambling into the regions of fancy; for, unfortunately,
there are no sufficient records yet to enter into this subject: but
if the study of hieroglyphics is still continued, the veil of Isis
may, perhaps, be raised. The Arabs have carried away a great part
of the materials of this temple; and, in a short time, the little
that is remaining of this, the _Selinunte_ of Ethiopian edifices,
will be entirely buried by the sand which is daily drifted in upon
it from the desert.
[Illustration: Pl. 23.
_On stone by C. Hullmandel, from a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
_Other Ruins at Gibel el Birkel._—Twenty yards to the west of
the Typhonium, marked in the plan, are the remains of another small
temple, excavated in the rock. The first court was ornamented with
columns, and on the walls I could distinguish traces of sculpture,
but now too much defaced to be legible. Besides the temples already
mentioned, situated under the mountain, there are the traces of
another, 200 feet from the great propylon of the large temple;
that is, about 700 feet from the mountain, towards the river. A
fragment of a wall, 6 feet by 3 feet, is all that now remains:
300 feet beyond the latter is a single column, with a lotus-flower
capital. From this column to the river are 4100 feet. The mountain
is, therefore, 5100 feet distant from the Nile.
To the north of the great temple are the ruins of buildings, chiefly
of brick, which seem to have formed part of the city, but they are of
no very great extent. Here are scattered numerous pieces of pottery,
and fragments of the same description of bread stamps which are found
at Thebes, but these are without hieroglyphic inscriptions. To the
east of the great temple, in the plain, are columns and traces of
other temples, but now almost entirely buried by the sand.
I have described all the temples now existing at Gibel el Birkel,
and mentioned the remains and traces of nine, and will now treat
of the monumental decorations of its interesting Necropolis. The
magnificence, power, and piety of the monarchs of Ethiopia are
displayed in the public works erected in honour of the gods. In
this beautiful cemetery, we have monuments either of the gratitude
and attachment of their subjects, or, more probably, of their own
ostentation. The kings of Egypt are supposed, for many reasons,
which I will mention at another opportunity, to have had their tombs
constructed long before their decease; and this instructive memorial
of the transient nature of their earthly greatness was worthy of
the wisdom and philosophy of so great a nation. The Ethiopians
probably had the same custom; and considering, as Diodorus says of
the Egyptians, their palaces only as inns where they tarried for a
day, they took care to have a more suitable habitation provided for
that state, in which they believed that they were to rest for ages.
[Illustration: Pl. 24.
_Drawn by L. Bandoni._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
GREAT TEMPLE, GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_London. Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
The pyramids are on the western side of the mountain. The first
group, of two, is 700 feet north-west of the Typhonium, the temple
I described as excavated in the rock. (See the General Plan and
vignette.[27]) The first, A, is 30 feet square; 40 feet to the
west of this, is the other, B, which is only 23 feet square. The
pyramid C, in the plan, is 235 feet distant from the latter, and
measures 30 feet by 26: twenty feet farther to the west is pyramid
D, which is 27 feet square. The one marked E, in the plan above,
adjoining the latter, is 36 feet square; and F, partly behind this,
is of the same size. Sixteen feet to the north of F, and north-west
of the pyramids C, D, E, is the largest one at Gibel el Birkel,
which is 88 feet square: the angle of this is more obtuse than that
of any of the other pyramids at Gibel el Birkel. The ruined state of
this large pyramid, and also of the others already described, will
be seen in the distance in Plate XXVII. One hundred and forty-five
feet to the north of this large pyramid is a small one, H, which is
only 25 feet square. The angle of this is much more acute, the height
being considerably more than the diameter at the base. It is scarcely
at all injured: the apex of the pyramids at this place, like those
in the Isle of Meroe, was never pointed. A flat space was always
left at the top for a statue, perhaps, or some other ornament. One
hundred and twenty-four feet to the west of the latter is another,
I, 23 feet square. This is very much ruined, particularly on one
side, but there are the remains of a portico before the south-east
side. The other eight pyramids, of which I have given the dimensions,
were without this ornament: at all events, there are no traces now
remaining, that induced me to suppose that any of them had porches
in front. The present state of the pyramids above described may be
observed in the distance of Plate XXVII.[28]
[Illustration: PLAN OF THE PYRAMIDS OF GIBEL EL BIRKEL.]
About 600 feet to the north-west is a fine group of eight other
pyramids, situated on an eminence, which adds greatly to their effect,
and gives them, at a distance, a still more imposing appearance. They
extend for 550 feet from east to west; five of them have porticoes,
or porches, the direction of which is about south-east, but rarely
exactly the same. (See Plan.) Plate XXVI. is a general view of
these pyramids, and the vignette represents one in detail. These
being accurate camera-lucida drawings, and every stone correct,
the reader will be able to judge of the neat construction of some
of these edifices, the regularity in the size of the stones (see
Plate XXVI.), and the manner in which they are joined together,
without cement. Plate XXVII. is a view of a group of these pyramids,
which also shows their construction; and in the distance is seen
the mountain and the other group of pyramids.
[Illustration: Pl. 25.
_On stone by W. P. Sherlock from a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
GREAT TEMPLE, GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
The height of these monuments varies from 35 to 60 feet. They
consist, according to their height, of from 30 to 60 steps each,
receding about 6 inches. They, therefore, may be ascended, but
with difficulty. They have smooth borders at the angles, like
some of the pyramids at Meroe. The first, marked K in the plan,
p. 149., 600 feet distant from the mountain, is about 65 feet
square. It seems to have had no portico, but it is quite in ruins;
it stood upon a stone basement. Thirty-six feet to the west of the
latter is the pyramid L. This is 33 feet square, a mass of ruins,
and no traces of the portico to be seen. This pyramid is the first
to the right in Plate XXVI.; and although rather indistinct, from
being placed in the distance, its dilapidated state may still be
observed. Ninety-five feet to the west of this is M, which is 38 feet
square. This has a portico before it: the summit of it is visible in
Plate XXVI. On the hard cement with which the interior of this portico
is covered, I observed some remains of painting, rather indifferently
executed. Fifteen feet to the south, and in the view almost covering
the last, is pyramid N. This is 44 feet square and 51 feet high,
and has a portico before it. Unfortunately, very few figures were
distinguishable; but sufficient to prove the identity of the style,
which is decidedly Ethiopian. As a further confirmation of this fact,
there is an inscription in Ethiopic characters. The masonry of this
pyramid is very well executed. This pyramid is the first that may
be remarked as entire in Plate XXVI.
[Illustration: PYRAMIDS OF GIBEL EL BIRKEL.]
There are porticoes, as I have said, before five of this group
of eight pyramids, almost similar to those before the pyramids
of Meroe. Some of these are ornamented with sculpture; but,
unfortunately, destitute of hieroglyphics, which never appear to
have been inserted upon them. I copied out of the pyramid N, the
most beautiful specimen of sculpture that now remains. (See Plate
XXIX.) The style may easily be perceived to be Ethiopian, from the
roundness of the arms, and the proportions being generally more
bulky than those of the Egyptians. This style differs so widely from
that remaining in the temple built by Tirhaka, that many ages must
certainly have elapsed before such an important change could have
taken place. The subject which I have copied is not particularly
interesting, being merely a presentation of offerings, but there is
a variety and elegance in the groups, seldom surpassed in Egyptian
productions. The offerings consist chiefly of branches of palm
trees, goats, cattle, &c., and libations. In the highest row,
Osiris is represented seated on his throne, as judge of Amenti,
and the divinities Anubis and Horus, are also in the same line. The
divinity with the globe and horns, in the second row, is probably
Isis; and the last in the second row is a figure of Typhon.
A personage larger than the others is holding incense on the
same elegant description of tray, having the form of a hand and
arm, which we see in Egypt. He is presenting it to the king, or
occupant of the tomb, who is represented seated under a canopy, on a
lion-shaped chair or throne, which differs, in a very slight degree,
from that we so often see in the sculptures of Egypt. The dress of
the king is different from the Egyptian. His necklace is curious:
he has in one hand a large and strong but beautifully-formed bow,
and in the other an arrow and a branch of the palm tree[29]: the
goddess of truth, with outstretched wings, is immediately behind his
throne. The traces of colour which still remain on this sculpture
I marked on my original drawing.
[Illustration: Pl. 26.
_On stone by W. P. Sherlock from a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
PYRAMIDS OF GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
On the other side of the portico, opposite to this sculpture, is
another subject, representing about 100 figures, rather curiously
grouped; also some large figures exactly similar to those above
described.
In the other porticoes no sculpture is perceptible, except some
fragments similar to the large figures in this plate.
At the end of some of the porticoes appear traces of the funeral
boats, similar to the one I described at Meroe. Notwithstanding some
differences, they appear to have the same signification as those over
the tombs of the kings. This circumstance, and the representation
of the goddess of truth, Osiris, the president of Amenti, and the
assistant divinities, Anubis, Thoth, and Horus, are proofs that
these were indubitably tombs.
These pyramids seem to have been the object of some learned curiosity
or avarice. Deceived by the false doors beneath the boats of the sun
at the end of the porticoes, persons have endeavoured, by blasting
the stones, to discover some inner chambers, and set at rest for ever
the question how, and for what purpose, they were constructed. The
rude force of barbarians, perhaps of Arabs, animated, probably,
by the hope of discovering treasure beneath, seems to have been
exercised in utterly destroying others.
Judging from the pyramids which are almost entirely ruined, and
from those that have been partly broken down, I do not conceive that
there is any chamber in the interior, but think it more probable that
the body was deposited in a small well, above which the pyramid was
afterwards erected. Yet Diodorus says that the Ethiopians differed
from other nations in the honours which they rendered to their
dead. “Some,” says he, “throw the bodies into the river,
believing that to be the most honourable sepulture which they
can give. Others keep them in their houses, shut up in niches of
alabaster, thinking it advantageous for a child to have ever before
his eyes the image of his father; and those who wished to preserve
the memory of their predecessors enclosed their bodies in a coffin of
baked earth, and interred them in the neighbourhood of the temples.”
The reader will have perceived, from these passages of Diodorus,
that it is not impossible that these porticoes may have been used to
contain the coffins; thus enabling the friends or children to visit
them, at the same time protecting them, to a certain degree, from the
hand of violence and the inclemency of the seasons. The mummies in
the Roman tombs in the Necropolis, in the Oasis Magna, were in wells;
and the Egyptians usually, but not invariably, interred their dead in
those receptacles. Many of the pyramids have no porticoes; therefore,
in those instances, the body must be underneath, probably in a well;
but the construction of these porticoes may have had its origin in
the piety and affection of individuals wishing to have the bodies of
their relations preserved in an accessible place, where, at certain
seasons, they could visit their remains, recall past scenes, indulge
their grief in bewailing their loss, and have ever before their eyes
a memorial of the brief sojourn of man in this valley of tears.
The pyramid marked O in the plan is thirty feet distant to the west
of N. This is 53 feet square, and the height 58 feet. This pyramid
is the second in Plate XXVI., and the B of Plate XXVIII. It will be
observed, in the view, that the upper part is very dilapidated; the
portico is very much injured; and, in consequence of the broken state
of the ground, it does not appear in my view. The sculpture which
it contains is of little importance. A figure offering incense to
the king, with the head-dress of a globe, long feathers, and short
horns. There is also a representation of the funeral boat.
[Illustration: Pl. 27.
_On stone by W. P. Sherlock, from a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
PYRAMIDS AT GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
The next (P, in the plan) is 35 feet square. This is the third,
from the left, in Plate XII., and is one of the most perfect. The
height is 48 feet, and the interior width of the portico is 6 feet 6
inches. This portico is arched. There seems to have been some ornament
(perhaps an inscription) attached to many of the façades of the
pyramids; for near the summits are circular holes, in which, probably,
rivets were inserted. Mr. Waddington found a piece of granite in
one. Near the summit of this there are three of these holes.
Q is 36 feet square. There are no traces of its ever having had any
portico. This is the second, from the left, in Plate XXVI. The summit
is very much injured.
Pyramid R is the first to the left. In the vignette, page 148.,
and Plates XXVI. and XXVII., it will be observed that it is
almost perfect, but that the roof of the portico has partly fallen
in. This pyramid is also represented as restored in Plate XXVIII. An
examination of this plate will afford to the reader a good idea of
the beauty of the architectural forms of these pyramids. A, which
corresponds with R in the plan, is 41 feet in diameter, and the
height is 46 feet. The angles of these pyramids being so much more
acute than those of Geezah, adds greatly to the elegance of their
architectural form. The small ornament at the angles is pretty, and
enhances very much the effect. The façade of the portico is also
pretty, but, as will be seen by the plates, has quite a different
form from the façades of the porticoes of the pyramids of Meroe. At
the latter place the doorway is between two towers, which, although
on a small scale, are almost similar in design to those of the great
propylons of Egypt. These, as will be seen by the plate, have more
the appearance of small temples. The façade is narrower at the top
than at the bottom, the total width of the latter being 20 feet, and
at the top 17 feet 6 inches. The square band and the cornice give it
more the appearance of a small temple. The architrave over the door is
ornamented with the globe and serpents. This pyramid is also arched.
In describing the pyramids of Meroe, I mentioned that the arch I
there found was a segment of a circle; but here it is very important
to observe that there are not only specimens of that, but also
one of the pointed arch. The latter, consisting of six stones, is
accurately drawn in the section. The stones are slightly hollowed
out to the shape of the arch, but do not advance beyond each other,
like the arch near the temple excavated out of the rock at Thebes,
but are supported only by _lateral pressure_.[30] The stones of this
arch are not joined with cement; but above the roof are a quantity
of small stones, which are kept together by a soft description of
cement. That these arches are not recently added, is proved, not only
by the appearance of the monuments themselves, being exactly of the
same description of fine hard sandstone, and of the same colour; but
still more certainly by the circumstance, that the portico I mentioned
as covered with cement, and painted in the ancient Ethiopian style,
is also, fortunately, arched. The interior of this arch is covered
with cement, which is harder than the stone, and painted.
The paintings on the arched roof, and the sides of the portico, are
evidently of the same period. As I have formerly observed, owing,
probably, to its very great antiquity, the painting is nearly defaced;
but still there was sufficient to convince me that the style is
certainly Ethiopian, of a far more ancient date than the sculpture
in the temple of Tirhaka.
[Illustration: Pl. 28.
_Drawn by L. Bandoni._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
PYRAMIDS OF GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_London. Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
The reader will observe, also, in the section, a specimen of a
semicircular arch. They are drawn very small, as belonging to the
pyramids, but they are not, on that account, less accurate; and,
therefore, almost equally useful as if they had been made separate
plates. The stone forming the keystone of this semicircular arch is
1 foot 9 inches in length; the stones supporting it, corresponding
precisely, 2 feet 1 inch, and the one on each side following these,
to the spring of the arch, 2 feet 4 inches. The arch, then, not
only the circular, but the pointed, had its origin in Ethiopia. The
oldest known in Europe is, I believe, that in the Cloacum Maximum,
supposed to have been built in the time of the Commonwealth. The
great antiquity, of the one on the Tiber is proved by its singular
construction, forming almost, as it were, three arches beneath
each other.
I am aware that the learned will be sceptical concerning the
antiquity of these. There are no remains in stone to prove that
the Egyptians were so far advanced in the construction of the arch
as these specimens show that the Ethiopians were. The only stone
arch that exists in Egypt is the one at North Der, at Thebes; and
that one proves that the Egyptians were acquainted with its beauty,
but not its utility and the correct mode of constructing it. The
vaulted tomb of stones at Memphis is of the time of Psammitichus,
who reigned immediately after the Ethiopian dynasty. The brick
arches in the tombs at Thebes, covered with cement, on which are the
royal name of Thothmes and Amenoph, prove that the Egyptians were,
at that period, acquainted with the arch; but it is rather singular
that there is no earlier specimen: whence, I think, we may infer,
as those were built soon after the terrible wars commenced, which are
represented on the walls at Thebes, that the Egyptians then, for the
first time, invaded Ethiopia, and there saw and became acquainted with
that useful construction. There seems to me no reason to suppose that
the knowledge of the utility and construction of the arch passed from
Egypt into Ethiopia: the contrary is much more probable, as we have
here far more perfect specimens than are found in Egypt; and as there
is no doubt of the very great antiquity of these ruins, can there
be any, that the invention of the arch had its origin in Ethiopia?[31]
The sandstone of which the pyramids are built is of a much harder
quality than that of the temples, being either from a vein in the
mountain which is now exhausted, or, as I conceive is most probable,
brought from distant quarries. This is an extraordinary proof that
the greatest pains were taken in the construction of these edifices,
to enable them to resist the ravages of time.
As to the antiquity of these structures, I conceive it to be very
great. Some of them appear more ancient than any that exist in the
valley of the Nile, with the exception, perhaps, of the pyramids
of Meroe and Nouri. They are the tombs of a dynasty of kings
whose names are now unknown. That they were royal sepulchres,
and not those of private individuals, is, I think, evident from
their being as magnificent as the pyramids at Meroe, which we know
to belong to kings from the ovals which they contain; and many
of the individuals in these tombs have the serpent, the emblem of
royalty, above their foreheads. If this had been the site of Napata,
I should conceive that the dilapidated state of the ruins might have
been caused by Petronius, who led there the Roman arms; but in the
Historical Appendix I will give the reader a further account of that
celebrated expedition. I trust that the hieroglyphic inscriptions
which I have copied will contain much valuable information; and that,
at all events, the name of a place, evidently once so considerable,
may again, with certainty, be enrolled in the list of cities. Her
habitations and her palaces are utterly destroyed: the desert is
swallowing up the remains of her temples; and the sepulchres of her
kings are fast decaying. A city where the arts evidently were once
so zealously cultivated,—where science and learning appear to have
reigned,—is now possessed by ignorant barbarian tribes. Where are
the descendants of that people who erected these splendid monuments to
their gods? Were they exterminated by the warlike tribe who now occupy
this territory, driven into other regions, or blended with the race
of their conquerors? These are questions of great importance, which I
may endeavour to illustrate in my historical chapter, but which I pass
by at present, as scarcely belonging to a topographical description.
[Illustration: Pl. 29.
_From a Drawing by G. A. Hoskins Esqr._
_Printed by C. Hullmandel._
SCULPTURE IN A PYRAMID AT GIBEL EL BIRKEL.
_Published by Longman, Rees & Co. April 6th. 1835._]
It is a circumstance, perhaps, worthy of remark, that some of the
most perfect heads sculptured on the pyramids had almost a European
profile. The Shageea—the brave tribe of Arabs who now possess
the magnificently rich and fertile plain near Gibel el Birkel, and
whose territory extends, on one side nearly to the fourth cataract,
and on the other to Dongolah—have, notwithstanding the darkness
of their complexion, nothing of the Negro features.