CHAPTER XXV

We left the inn at Brigg, after having stopped there above a week, and

proceeded on our way to Vevey, which had always been an interesting

point in the horizon, and a resting-place to the imagination. In

travelling, we visit _names_ as well as places; and Vevey is the scene

of the _New Eloise_. In spite of Mr. Burke’s philippic against this

performance, the contempt of the _Lake School_, and Mr. Moore’s late

_Rhymes on the Road_, I had still some overmastering recollections on

that subject, which I proposed to indulge at my leisure on the spot

which was supposed to give them birth, and which I accordingly did. I

did not, on a re-perusal, find my once favourite work quite so vapid,

quite so void of eloquence or sentiment as some critics (it is true, not

much beholden to it) would insinuate. The following passage, among

others, seemed to me the perfection of style:—‘_Mais vois la rapidité de

cet astre, qui vole et ne s’arrête jamais; le tems fuit, l’occasion

échappe, ta beauté, ta beauté même aura son terme, elle doit flétrir et

périr un jour comme un fleur qui tombe sans avoir été cueilli!_’ What a

difference between the sound of this passage and of Mr. Moore’s verse or

prose! Nay, there is more imagination in the single epithet _astre_,

applied as it is here to this brilliant and fleeting scene of things,

than in all our fashionable poet’s writings! At least I thought so,

reading St. Preux’s Letter in the wood near Clarens, and stealing

occasional glances at the lake and rocks of Meillerie. But I am

anticipating.

The mountains on either side of the Valley of the Simplon present a

gloomy succession of cliffs, often covered with snow, and contrasting by

no means agreeably with the marshy grounds below, through which the

Rhone wanders scarce noticed, scarce credited. It is of a whitish muddy

colour (from the snow and sand mingled with its course, very much as if

had been poured out of a washing-tub), and very different from the deep

purple tint it assumes on oozing out from the other side of the Lake,

after having drank its cerulean waters. The woods near the lofty peaks

of the Clise-Horn, and bordering on Monteroso, are said to be still the

frequent haunt of bears, though a price is set upon their heads. As we

advanced farther on beyond Tortomania, the whole breadth of the valley

was sometimes covered with pine-forests, which gave a relief to the eye,

and afforded scope to the imagination. The fault of mountain scenery in

general is, that it is too barren and naked, and that the whole is

exposed in enormous and unvarying masses to the view at once. The

clothing of trees is no less wanted as an ornament than partially to

conceal objects, and thus present occasional new points of view. Without

something to intercept and break the aggregate extent of surface, you

gain no advantage by change of place; the same elevation and ground-plan

of hill and valley are still before you—you might as well carry a map or

landscape in your hand. In this part of our journey, however, besides

the natural wildness and grandeur of the scenery, the road was rough and

uneven, and frequently crossed rude bridges over the Rhone, or over

rivulets pouring into it: the gloomy recesses of the forests might be

the abode of wild beasts or of the lurking robber. The huge fragments of

rock that had tumbled from the overhanging precipices often made a

turning in the road necessary, and for a moment interrupted the view

beyond; the towns, built on the sides of the hills, resembled shattered

heaps of rock, scarcely distinguishable from the grey peaks and crags

with which they were surrounded, giving an agreeable play to the fancy;

while the snowy tops of the Simplon mountains, now coming in sight, now

hidden behind the nearer summits, threw us back to the scenes we had

left, and measured the distance we had traversed. The way in which these

mighty landmarks of the Alpine regions ascertain this point is, however,

contrary to the usual one: for it is by appearing plainer, the farther

you retire from them. They tower with airy shape and dazzling whiteness

above the lengthening perspective; and it is the intervening objects

that dwindle in the comparison, and are lost sight of in succession. In

the midst of the most lonely and singular part of this scene, just as we

passed a loose bridge of rough fir-planks over a brawling brook, and as

a storm seemed to threaten us, we met a party of English gentlemen in an

open carriage, though their courteous looks and waving salutation almost

‘forbade us to interpret them such.’ Certainly there is no people in

whom urbanity is more a duty than the English; for there is no people

that feel it more. Travelling confounds our ideas, not of place only,

but of time; and I could not help making a sudden transition from the

party we had by chance encountered to the Chevalier Grandison and his

friends, paying their last visit to Bologna. Pshaw! Why do I indulge in

such idle fancies? Yet why in truth should I not, when I am a thousand

miles from home, and when every object one meets is like a dream? _Passe

pour cela._

We reached Sion that evening. It is one of the dirtiest and least

comfortable towns on the road; nor does the chief inn deserve the

epithet so applicable to Swiss inns in general—_simplex munditiis_. It

was here that Rousseau, in one of his early peregrinations, was

recommended by his landlord to an iron-foundry in the neighbourhood (the

smoke of which, I believe, we saw at a little distance), where he would

be likely to procure employment, mistaking ‘the pauper lad’ for a

journeyman blacksmith. Perhaps the author of the _Rhymes on the Road_

will think it a pity he did not embrace this proposal, instead of

forging thunderbolts for kingly crowns. Alas! Mr. Moore would then never

have had to write his ‘Fables for the Holy Alliance.’ Haunted by some

indistinct recollection of this adventure, I asked at the Inn, ‘If Jean

Jacques Rousseau had ever resided in the town?’ The waiter himself could

not tell, but soon after brought back for answer, ‘That Monsieur

Rousseau had never lived there, but that he had passed through about

fourteen years before on his way to Italy, when he had only time to stop

to take tea!’—Was this a mere stupid blunder, or one of the refractions

of fame, founded on his mission as Secretary to the Venetian Ambassador

a hundred years before? There is a tradition in the neighbourhood of

Milton’s house in York-street, Westminster, that ‘one Mr. _Milford_, a

celebrated poet, formerly lived there!’ We set forward the next morning

on our way to Martigny, through the most dreary valley possible, and in

an absolute straight line for twelve or fifteen miles of level road,

which was terminated by the village-spire and by the hills leading to

the Great St. Bernard and Mont-Blanc. The wind poured down from these

tremendous hills, and blew with unabated fury in our faces the whole

way. It was a most unpleasant ride, nor did the accommodations at the

inn (the Swan, I think) make us amends. The rooms were cold and empty.

It might be supposed that the desolation without had subdued the

imagination to its own hue and quality, so that it rejected all attempts

at improvement; that the more niggard Nature had been to it, the more

churlish it became to itself; and through habit, neither felt the want

of comforts nor a wish to supply others with them. Close to the bridge

stands a steep rock with a castle at the top of it (attributed to the

times of the Romans). At a distance it was hardly discernible; and

afterwards, when we crossed over to Chamouni, we saw it miles below us

like a dove-cot, or a dirt-pye raised by children. Yet viewed from

beneath, it seemed to present an imposing and formidable attitude, and

to elevate its pigmy front in a line with the stately heights around. So

Mr. Washington Irvine binds up his own portrait with Goldsmith’s in the

Paris edition of his works, and to many people seems the _genteeler_

man! From the definite and dwarfish, we turned to the snow-clad and

cloud-capt; and strolled to the other side of the village, where the

road parts to St. Bernard and Chamouni, anxiously gazing at the steep

pathway on either side, and half tempted to launch into that billowy sea

of mist and mountain: but we reserved this for a subsequent period. As

we were loitering at the foot of the dizzy ascent, our postilion, who

had staid behind us a couple of hours the day before to play at bowls,

now drove on half an hour before his time, and when we turned a corner

which gave us a view of our inn, no cabriolet was there. He, however,

soon found his mistake, and turned back to meet us. The only picturesque

objects between this and Bex are a waterfall about two hundred feet in

height, issuing through the cavities of the mountain from the immense

glacier in the valley of Trie, and the romantic bridge of St. Maurice,

the boundary between Savoy and the Pays de Vaud. On the ledge of a rocky

precipice, as you approach St. Maurice, stands a hermitage in full view

of the road; and possibly the inmate consoles himself in his voluntary

retreat by watching the carriages as they come in sight, and fancying

that the driver is pointing out his aërial dwelling to the inquisitive

and wondering traveller! If a man could transport himself to one of the

fixed stars, so far from being lifted above this sublunary sphere, he

would still wish his fellow-mortals to point to it as his particular

abode, and the scene of his marvellous adventures. We go into a crowd to

be seen: we go into solitude that we may be distinguished from the

crowd, and talked of. We travel into foreign parts to get the start of

those who stay behind us; we return home to hear what has been said of

us in our absence. Lord Byron mounted on his pedestal of pride on the

shores of the Adriatic, as Mr. Hobhouse rides in the car of popularity

through the streets of Westminster. The one object could be seen at a

distance; the other, whose mind is more Sancho-Panza-ish and

_pug-featured_, requires to be brought nearer to the eye for

stage-effect! Bex itself is delicious. It stands in a little nook of

quiet, almost out of the world, nestling in rural beauty, in mountain

sublimity. There is an excellent inn, a country church before it, a

large ash tree, a circulating library, a rookery, every thing useful and

comfortable for the life of man. Behind, there is a ridge of dark rocks;

beyond them tall and bare mountains—and a higher range still appears

through rolling clouds and circling mists. Our reception at the inn was

every way what we could wish, and we were half disposed to stop here for

some months. But something whispered me on to Vevey:—this we reached the

next day in a drizzling shower of rain, which prevented our seeing much

of the country, excepting the black masses of rock and pine-trees that

rose perpendicularly from the roadside. The day after my arrival, I

found a lodging at a farm-house, a mile out of Vevey, so ‘lapped in

luxury,’ so retired, so reasonable, and in every respect convenient,

that we remained here for the rest of the summer, and felt no small

regret at leaving it.

The country round Vevey is, I must nevertheless own, the least

picturesque part of the borders of the Lake of Geneva. I wonder

Rousseau, who was a good judge and an admirable describer of romantic

situations, should have fixed upon it as the scene of the ‘New Eloise.’

You have passed the rocky and precipitous defiles at the entrance into

the valley, and have not yet come into the open and more agreeable parts

of it. The immediate vicinity of Vevey is entirely occupied with

vineyards slanting to the south, and inclosed between stone-walls

without any kind of variety or relief. The walks are uneven and bad, and

you in general see little (for the walls on each side of you) but the

glassy surface of the Lake, the rocky barrier of the Savoy Alps opposite

(one of them crowned all the year round with snow, and which, though it

is twenty miles off, seems as if you could touch it with your hand, so

completely does size neutralize the effect of distance), the green hills

of an inferior class over Clarens, with the Dent de Jamant sticking out

of them like an iron tooth, and the winding valley leading northward

towards Berne and Fribourg. Here stands Gelamont (the name of the

_Campagna_ which we took), on a bank sloping down to the brook that

passes by Vevey, and so entirely embosomed in trees and ‘upland swells,’

that it might be called, in poetical phrase, ‘the peasant’s nest.’ Here

every thing was perfectly clean and commodious. The _fermier_ or

vineyard-keeper, with his family, lived below, and we had six or seven

rooms on a floor (furnished with every article or convenience that a

London lodging affords) for thirty Napoleons for four months, or about

thirty shillings a week. This first expense we found the greatest during

our stay, and nearly equal to all the rest, that of a servant included.

The number of English settled here had made lodgings dear, and an

English gentleman told me he was acquainted with not less than

three-and-twenty English families in the neighbourhood. To give those

who may feel an inclination to try foreign air, an idea of the

comparative cheapness of living abroad, I will mention that mutton

(equal to the best Welch mutton, and fed on the high grounds near

Moudon) is two batz, that is, threepence English per pound; and the beef

(which is also good, though not of so fine a quality) is the same.

Trout, caught in the Lake, you get almost for nothing. A couple of fowls

is eighteen-pence. The wine of the country, which though not rich, is

exceedingly palatable, is three pence a bottle. You may have a basket of

grapes in the season for one shilling or fifteen pence.[48] The bread,

butter and milk are equally cheap and excellent. They have not the art

here of adulterating every thing. You find the same things as in

England, served up in the same plain and decent manner, but in greater

plenty, and generally speaking, of a better and more wholesome quality,

and at least twice as cheap. In England they have few things, and they

contrive to spoil those few. There is a good deal of ill-nature and

churlishness, as well as a narrow policy in this. The trading principle

seems to be to give you the worst, and make you pay as dear for it as

possible. It is a vile principle. As soon as you land at Dover, you feel

the force of this _home_ truth. They cheat you to your face, and laugh

at you. I must say, that it appears to me, whatever may be the faults or

vices of other nations, the English _population_ is the only one to

which the epithet _blackguard_ is applicable. They are, in a word, the

only people who make a merit of giving others pain, and triumph in their

impudence and ill-behaviour, as proofs of a manly and independent

spirit. Afraid that you may complain of the absence of foreign luxuries,

they are determined to let you understand beforehand, they do not care

about what you may think, and wanting the art to please, resort to the

easier and surer way of keeping up their importance by practising every

kind of annoyance. Instead of their being at your mercy, you find

yourself at theirs, subjected to the sullen airs of the masters, and to

the impertinent fatuity of the waiters. They dissipate your theory of

English comfort and hospitality at the threshold. What do they care that

you have cherished a fond hope of getting a nice, _snug_ little dinner

on your arrival, better than any you have had in France? ‘The French may

be d——,’ is the answer that passes through their minds—‘the dinner is

good enough, if it is English!’ Let us take care, that by assuming an

insolent local superiority over all the world, we do not sink below them

in every thing, liberty not excepted. While the name of any thing passes

current, we may dispense with the reality, and keep the start of the

rest of mankind, simply by asserting that we have it, and treating all

foreigners as a set of poor wretches, who neither know how, nor are in

truth fit to live! Against this post, alas! John Bull is continually

running his head, but as yet without knocking his brains out. The

beef-steak which you order at Dover with patriotic tender yearnings for

its reputation, is accordingly filled with cinders—the mutton is done to

a rag—the soup not eatable—the porter sour—the bread gritty—the butter

rancid. Game, poultry, grapes, wine it is in vain to think of; and as

you may be mortified at the privation, they punish you for your

unreasonable dissatisfaction by giving you cause for it in the

mismanagement of what remains.[49] In the midst of this ill fare you

meet with equally bad treatment. While you are trying to digest a tough

beef-steak, a fellow comes in and peremptorily demands your fare, on the

assurance that you will get your baggage from the clutches of the

Custom-house in time to go by the six o’clock coach; and when you find

that this is impossible, and that you are to be trundled off at two in

the morning, or by the next day’s coach, _if_ it is not _full_, and

complain to that personification of blind justice, an English mob, you

hear the arch _slang_ reply, ‘Do you think the Gentleman such a fool as

to part with his money without knowing why?’ and should the natural

rejoinder rise to your lips—‘Do you take me for a fool, because I did

not take you for a rogue?’ the defendant immediately stands at bay upon

the national character for honesty and morality. ‘I hope there are no

rogues here!’ is echoed through the dense atmosphere of English

intellect, though but the moment before they had been laughing in their

sleeves (or out loud) at the idea of a stranger having been tricked by a

townsman. Happy country! equally and stupidly satisfied with its vulgar

vices and boasted virtues!

‘Oh! for a lodge in some vast wilderness,

Some boundless continuity of shade!’

Yet to what purpose utter such a wish, since it is impossible to stay

there, and the moment you are separated from your fellows, you think

better of them, begin to form chimeras with which you would fain compare

the realities, find them the same as ever to your cost and shame—

‘And disappointed still, are still deceived!’

I found little of this _tracasserie_ at Gelamont. Days, weeks, months,

and even years might have passed on much in the same manner, with ‘but

the season’s difference.’ We breakfasted at the same hour, and the

tea-kettle was always boiling (an excellent thing in housewifery)—a

_lounge_ in the orchard for an hour or two, and twice a week we could

see the steam-boat creeping like a spider over the surface of the lake;

a volume of the Scotch novels (to be had in every library on the

Continent, in English, French, German, or Italian, as the reader

pleases), or M. Galignani’s Paris and London _Observer_, amused us till

dinner time; then tea and a walk till the moon unveiled itself,

‘apparent queen of night,’ or the brook, swoln with a transient shower,

was heard more distinctly in the darkness, mingling with the soft,

rustling breeze; and the next morning the song of peasants broke upon

refreshing sleep, as the sun glanced among the clustering vine-leaves,

or the shadowy hills, as the mists retired from their summits, looked in

at our windows. The uniformity of this mode of life was only broken

during fifteen weeks that we remained in Switzerland, by the civilities

of Monsieur Le Vade, a Doctor of medicine and octogenarian, who had been

personally acquainted with Rousseau in his younger days; by some

attempts by our neighbours to _lay us under obligations_, by parting

with rare curiosities to Monsieur l’Anglois for half their value; and by

an excursion to Chamouni, of which I must defer the account to my next.

The collected works of William Hazlitt, Vol. 09 (of 12) · 第 25 / 31 章