Sensation likewise depends, in a great measure, on the state of the

mind, and on the degree of attention which it gives. For if we are

engaged in attention to any object, we are insensible of the

impressions made upon us by others, though they are sufficiently

strong to affect us at other times. Thus, when our attention is fixed

strongly upon any particular object, we become insensible of the

various noises that surround us, though these may be sometimes very

loud. On the contrary, if our attention be upon the watch, we can

perceive slight, and almost neglected impressions, while those of

greater magnitude become insensible. The ticking of a clock becomes

insensible to us from repetition, but if we attend to it, we become

easily sensible of it, though at the same time we become insensible

of much stronger impressions, such as the rattling of coaches in the

streets.

The attention depends in some degree on the will, but is generally

given to those impressions which are particularly strong, new,

pleasant, or disagreeable; in short, to those which particularly

affect the mind. Hence it is, that things which are new, produce the

most vivid impressions, which gradually grow fainter, and at last

become imperceptible.

There is one circumstance respecting sensation, which will probably

account for our only perceiving those impressions to which the mind

attends: and this is, that the mind is incapable of perceiving more

than one impression at a time: the more accurately we examine this,

the greater reason we shall have to think it true; but the mind can

turn its attention so quickly, from one object to another, that at

first sight, we are led to believe, that we are able to attend to

several at the same time.

But though the mind cannot perceive or attend to various sensations

at the same time, yet if two or more of these are capable of uniting

in such a manner as to produce a compound sensation, this may be

perceived by the mind.

This compound sensation may be produced either by impressions made at

the same instant, or succeeding each other so quickly, that the

second takes place before the first has vanished.

As an instance of the first, we may mention musical chords, or the

sounds produced by the union of two or more tones at the same time.

We have another instance likewise in odours or smells; if two or more

perfumes be mixed together, a compound odour will be perceived,

different from any of them.

As an instance of the latter, if a paper painted of various colours

be made to revolve rapidly in a circle, a compound colour, different

from any of them, will be perceived. These observations apply

particularly to the senses we have mentioned, and likewise to taste:

but the sensations afforded us by touch do not seem capable of being

compounded in this manner.

There are many things necessary to perfect sensation, besides those

that have been mentioned. The degree and perfection of sensation will

depend much on the mind, and will be continually altered by delirium,

torpor, sleep, and other circumstances; much likewise depends on the

state of the organs with respect to preceding impressions; for if any

organ of sense have been subjected to a strong impression, it will

become nearly insensible of those which are weaker.

Of this innumerable instances may be given: an eye which has been

subjected to a strong light, becomes insensible of a weaker: and on

the contrary, if the organs of sense have been deprived of their

accustomed impressions for some time, they are affected by very

slight ones. Hence it is, that when a person goes from daylight into

a darkened room, he can at first see nothing; by degrees however he

begins to have an imperfect perception of the different objects, and

if he remain long enough, he will see them with tolerable

distinctness, though the quantity of light be the same as when he

entered the room, when they were invisible to him.

Sensation often arises from internal causes, without any external

impulse. To this source may be referred consciousness, memory,

imagination, volition, and other affections of the mind. These are

called the internal senses. The senses, whether internal or external,

have never been accurately reduced to classes, orders, or genera; the

external indeed are generally referred to five orders; namely,

seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and feeling, or touch. With

respect to the four first, the few qualities of external bodies which

each perceives may be easily reduced to classes, each of which may be

referred to its peculiar organ of sensation, because each organ is so

constituted, that it can only be affected by one class of properties;

thus the eye can only be affected by light; the ear by the vibrations

of the air, and so of the rest.

The same organ, whatever be its state, or whatever be the degree of

impulse, always gives to the mind a similar sensation; nor is it

possible, by any means we are acquainted with, to communicate the

sensation peculiar to one organ by means of another. Thus we are

incapable, for instance, of hearing with our eyes, and seeing with

our ears: nor have we any reason to believe that similar impressions

produce dissimilar sensations in different people. The pleasure,

however, as well as the pain and disgust, accompanying different

sensations, differ very greatly in different persons, and even in the

same person at different times; for the sensations which sometimes

afford us pleasure, at other times produce disgust.

Habit has a powerful influence in modifying the pleasures of

sensation, without producing any change in the sensation itself, or

in the external qualities suggested by it. Habit, for instance, will

never cause a person to mistake gentian or quassia for sugar, but it

may induce an appetite or liking for what is bitter, and a disgust

for what is sweet. No person perhaps was originally delighted with

the taste of opium or tobacco, they must at first be highly

disgusting to most people; but custom not only reconciles the taste

to them, but they become grateful, and even necessary.

Almost every species of sensation becomes grateful or otherwise,

according to the force of the impression; for there is no sensation

so pleasant, but, that, by increasing its intensity, it will become

ungrateful, and at length intolerable. And, on the contrary, there

are many which on account of their force are naturally unpleasant,

but become, when diminished, highly pleasant. The softest and

sweetest sounds may be increased to such a degree as to be extremely

unpleasant: and when we are in the steeple of a church, the noise of

a peal of bells stuns and confounds our senses, while at a distance

their effect is very pleasant. The smell of musk likewise at a

distance, and in small quantity, is pleasant; but when brought near,

or in large quantity, it becomes highly disagreable. The same may be

observed with respect to the objects of the other senses.

For a similar reason, many sensations which are at first pleasing,

cease to delight by frequent repetition; though the impression

remains the same. This is so well known that illustrations are

unnecessary. Those who are economical of their pleasures, or who wish

them to be permanent, must not repeat them too frequently. In music,

a constant repetition of the sweetest and fullest chords, cloys the

ear; while a judicious mixture of them with tones less harmonious

will be long relished. Those who are best acquainted with the human

heart need not be told, that this observation is not confined to

music.

On the same principle likewise we can account for the pleasure

afforded by objects that are new; and why variety is the source of so

many pleasures; why we gradually wish for an increase in the force of

the impression in proportion to its continuance.

The pleasures of the senses are confined within narrow limits, and

can neither be much increased nor too often repeated, without being

destructive of themselves; thus we are admonished by nature, that our

constitutions were not formed to bear the continual pleasures of

sense; for the too free use of any of them, is not only destructive

of itself, but induces those painful and languid sensations so often

complained of by the voluptuary, and which not unfrequently produce a

state of mind that prompts to suicide.

As the transition from pleasure to pain is natural, so the remission

of pain, particularly if it is great, becomes a source of pleasure.

There is much truth, therefore, in the beautiful allegory of

Socrates, who tells us, that Pleasure and Pain were sisters, who,

however, met with a very different reception by mankind on their visit

to the earth; the former being universally courted, while the latter

was carefully avoided: on this account, Pain petitioned Jupiter, who

decreed that they should not be parted; and that whoever embraced the

one, obtained also the other.

There is a great diversity with respect to the duration of the

pleasures of the different senses: some of the senses become soon

fatigued, and lose the power of distinguishing accurately their

different objects: others, on the contrary, remain perfect a long

time. Thus smell and taste are soon satiated; hearing more slowly;

while, of all the external senses, the objects of sight please us the

longest. We may, however, prolong the pleasures of sense by varying

them properly, and by a proper mixture of objects or circumstances

which are indifferent, and afford less delight. But the very

constitution of our nature limits our enjoyments, and points out the

impossibility of perpetual pleasures in this state of our existence.

To a person who is thirsty, water is delicious nectar; to one who is

hungry, every kind of food is agreeable, and even its smell pleasant;

to a person who is hot and feverish, the cool air is highly

refreshing. But to the same persons in different circumstances, the

same things are not only indifferent, but even disgusting; for

instance, a person cannot bear the sight or smell of food, after

having satiated himself with it, and perpetual feasting will cloy the

appetite of the keenest epicure.

I shall conclude this account of the general laws of sensation, by a

short recapitulation of those laws.

And, in the first place, it may be observed, that the energy or force

of any sensation, is proportioned to the degree of attention given by

the mind to the external object which causes it.

Secondly, A repetition of sensations diminishes their energy, and at

last nearly destroys it; but this energy is restored by rest, or the

absence of these sensations.

Thirdly, The mind cannot attend to two impressions at the same time:

so that two sensations never act with the same force at the same

instant; the stronger generally overcoming the weaker. The mind,

however, can attend to the weaker sensation, in such a manner, as to

overpower the stronger, or to render it insensible.

Having fully considered the general laws of sensation, I shall now

proceed to examine those proper to each sense; and in this

examination, two objects will engage our attention. 1. The structure

of the organ which receives and transmits the impulse to the mind. 2.

The qualities or properties of external bodies, particularly those by

which they are fitted to excite sensation.

The first sense that we shall examine is touch, which, of all the

external senses, is the most simple, as well as the most generally

diffused. By means of this sense, we are capable of perceiving

various qualities and properties of bodies, such as hardness,

softness, roughness, smoothness, temperature, magnitude, figure,

distance, pressure, and weight; this sense is seldom depraved;

because the bodies, whose properties are examined by it, are applied

immediately to the extremities of the nerves, without the

intervention of any medium liable to be deranged, as is the case with

the eye, and ear.

The organ of touch is seated chiefly in the skin, but different parts

of this covering possess different degrees of sensibility. The skin

consists of three parts. 1. The cutis vera, or true skin, which

covers the greatest part of the surface of the body. When the skin is

examined by a microscope, we find it composed of an infinite number

of papillae, or small eminencies, which seem to be the extremities of

nerves, each of which is accompanied by an artery and a vein, so that

when the vessels of the skin are injected, the whole appears red. 2.

Immediately over the true skin, and filling up its various

inequalities, lies a mucous reticulated substance, which has been

called by Malpighi, who first described it, rete mucosum. The real

skin is white in the inhabitants of every climate; but the rete

mucosum is of various colours, being white in Europeans, olive in

Asiatics, black in Africans, and copper coloured in Americans. This

variety depends chiefly on the degree of light and heat; for, if we

were to take a globe, and paint a portion of it with the colour of

the inhabitants of corresponding latitudes, we should have an uniform

gradation of shade, deepening from the pole to the equator.

The diversity of colour depends upon the bleaching power of the

oxygen, which, in temperate climates, combines more completely with

the carbonaceous matter deposited in the rete mucosum; while, in

hotter climates, the oxygen is kept in a gaseous state by the heat

and light, and has less tendency to unite with the carbonaceous

matter. In proof of this, the skins of Africans may be rendered white

by exposure to the oxygneated muriatic acid.

Over the rete mucosum is spread a fine transparent membrane, called

the cuticle, or scarf skin, which defends the organ of feeling from

the action of the air, and other things which would irritate it too

powerfully. In some parts of the body this membrane is very thick, as

in the soles of the feet, and palms of the hands; and this thickness

is much increased by use and pressure.

In general, the thinner the cuticle is, the more acute is the sense

of touch. This sense is very acute and delicate about the ends of the

fingers, where we have the most need of it; but in the lips, mouth,

and tongue, it is still more delicate; a galvanic or electrical shock

being felt by the tongue, when it is impossible for us to perceive it

by the fingers.

This sense, like the others, becomes more exquisite when its organ is

defended from the action of external bodies; it is on this account

that the cuticle becomes so sensible under the end of the nail, which

defends it from the action of external objects; and when part of the

nail is taken away, we can scarcely bear to touch any thing with this

newly exposed part of the skin.

When we place our fingers upon the surface of any body, the first

sensation we experience is that of resistance, after which the other

properties are perceived in a natural order; such as heat or cold,

moisture or dryness, motion or rest, distance, and figure or shape.

With respect to the diseases of this sense, it is very seldom that it

becomes too acute over the whole body; though it frequently does so

in particular parts, which may arise from the cuticle being too thin

or abraded, or from an inflamed state of the part.

It however becomes sometimes obtuse, and indeed almost abolished over

the whole body; and this takes place from compression of the brain,

and various affections of the nervous power. This diminution is

called anaesthesia. The touch becomes deficient, and indeed almost

abolished, when the cuticle is injured by the frequent application of

hot bodies, or acrid substances: thus the cuticle of the hands of

blacksmiths and glassblowers is generally so hard and horny, that

they can take up and grasp in their hand pieces of redhot iron with

impunity.

We generally refer pain to this sense, though it may arise from too

violent an impression made upon any of the organs of sense.

Pain is an unpleasant sensation, which the mind refers to some part

of the body, and very accurately, if any part of the surface is

affected, but less so, if it arises from the affection of an internal

part. The sensation of pain may arise from any thing which tends to

injure the structure of the body, whether that be internal or

external; so that it serves as a monitor to put us on our guard, and

to induce us to remove any thing which might be injurious to us. This

sensation is produced by any thing which punctures, cuts, tears,

distends, compresses, bruises, corrodes, burns, or violently

stimulates any part of the body.

A moderate degree of pain in any part excites the action of the whole

body; a greater quantity of blood and nervous energy is determined to

the part. A still greater degree of pain brings on inflammation and

its consequences, and if it be intense, it will bring on fever,

convulsions, delirium, fainting, and even death.

The endurance of pain depends much on the strength of mind possessed

by the patient, which, in some instances, is such, that the most

violent pains are patiently endured; while in other instances, the

slightest can scarcely be born.

It is a curious circumstance, that a moderate degree of pain, when

unaccompanied by fever, often tends to render the understanding more

clear, lively, and active. This is confirmed by the experience of

people labouring under gout. We have an account of a man who

possessed very ordinary powers of understanding, but who exhibited

the strongest marks of intelligence and genius in consequence of a

severe blow on the head; but that he lost these powers when he

recovered from the effects of the blow. Pechlin mentions a young man,

who during a complaint originating from worms, possessed an

astonishing memory and lively imagination, both of which he nearly

lost by being cured. Haller mentions a man who was able to see in the

night, while his eyes were inflamed, but lost this power as he got

well. All these facts show, that a certain action or energy is

necessary for the performance of any of the functions of the body or

mind; and whatever increases this action will, within certain limits,

increase those functions.

Feeling is by far the most useful, extensive, and important of the

senses, and may be said indeed to be the basis of them all. Vision

would be of very little use to us, if it were not aided by the sense

of feeling; we shall afterwards see that the same observation may be

applied to the other senses. In short, it is to this sense that we

are indebted, either immediately or indirectly, for by far the

greatest part of our knowledge; for without it we should not be able

to procure any idea with respect to the magnitude, distance, shape,

heat, hardness or softness, asperity or smoothness of bodies; indeed,

if we were deprived of this sense, it is difficult to say whether we

should have any idea of the existence of any external bodies; on the

contrary, it seems probable that we should not.

LECTURE VI.

TASTE AND SMELL.

From the sense of touch we proceed naturally to that of taste, for

there seems to be less difference between these two senses than

between any of the others. The sense of taste appears to be seated

chiefly in the tongue; for any sweet substance, such as sugar,

applied to any other part of the mouth, scarcely excites the least

sensation of taste. The same may be observed with respect to any

other sapid body, which, unless it is strongly acrid or irritating,

produces no effect on any other part than the tongue; but if it is

possessed of much acrimony, it then not only affects the palate, and

uvula, but even the oesophagus.

The tongue is a muscular substance, placed in the mouth, connected by

one end with the adjacent bones and cartilages, while the other end

remains free, and easily moveable. The tongue is furnished,

particularly on its upper surface, with innumerable nervous papillae,

which are much larger than those I described as belonging to the

skin. These papillae are of a conical figure, and extremely sensible,

forming, without doubt, the true organ of taste; other papillae are

found between them, which are partly conical, and partly cylindrical.

Over the papillae of the tongue is spread a single mucous, and

semipellucid covering, which adheres firmly to them, and serves the

purpose of a cuticle.

Under these papillae are spread the muscles which make up the fleshy

part of the tongue: these are extremely numerous, and by their means

the tongue possesses the power of performing a great variety of

motions with surprising velocity.

The arteries leading to the tongue are extremely numerous; and, when

injected with a red fluid, the whole substance appears of a beautiful

red.

The tongue is likewise furnished with a large supply of nerves, some

of which undoubtedly serve to supply its muscles with nervous energy,

while others terminate in the papillae, and form the proper organ of

taste: this office seems to be performed by the third branch of the

fifth pair of nerves. The papillae, before described, are formed or

composed of a number of small nerves, arteries, and veins, firmly

united together by cellular substance. These papillae are excited to

action by the application of any sapid body; in consequence of which

they receive a greater supply of blood, become enlarged, and vastly

more sensible.

The structure of the tongue differs in different animals, which

likewise possess corresponding differences with respect to taste. In

those quadrupeds, in which it is armed with sharp points, the sense

of taste is by no means acute. The same is the case with birds and

reptiles, whose tongues are very dry and rough.

In a former lecture I took notice of a liquor which is secreted by

the glands of the mouth and neighbouring parts, which is called

saliva. This liquor acts an important part in the production of

taste; it does not differ much from water, excepting by containing a

quantity of mucilage; and nothing is sapid, or capable of affecting

the sense of taste, unless it is in some degree soluble in this

liquor. Hence earthy substances, which are nearly insoluble, have

little or no taste.

It is not, however, sufficient that the substance be possessed of

solubility alone; it is necessary likewise that it should be

possessed of saline properties, or, at least, of a kind of acrimony,

which renders it capable of stimulating the nervous papillae. Hence

it is that those substances which are less saline, and less acrid

than the saliva, have no taste.

We are capable of distinguishing various kinds of taste, but some of

them with less accuracy than others. Among the different kinds of

taste, the following have been considered by Haller, and some other

physiologists, as primitive: sweet, sour, bitter, and saline. The

others have been thought to be compounded of these; for the sense of

taste, as well as sight and hearing, is capable of perceiving

compound impressions. To these primitive tastes, Boerhaave added

alkaline, spirituous, aromatic, and some others. Of these, in

different proportions, all the varieties of tastes, which are

extremely numerous, are composed.

Some tastes are pleasant and agreeable, others disagreeable, and

scarcely tolerable: there is, however, a great diversity in this

respect experienced by different persons; for the same taste, which

is highly grateful to some, is extremely unpleasant to others.

But the most pleasant tastes, agreeably to the general laws of

sensation, which I described in the last lecture, become gradually

less pleasant, and at last disgusting; while, on the contrary, the

most disagreeable savours, such as tobacco, opium, and assafoetida,

become, by custom, not only tolerable, but highly agreeable.

Popular Lectures on Zoonomia Or The Laws of Animal Life, in Health and Disease · 第 7 / 23 段