BOOK-PLATE OF SIR ARTHUR VICARS. By C.W. Sherborn.]

Until the advent of the new taste the devising of book-plates was almost

invariably left to the routine skill of the heraldic stationer. Of late

years the composition of personal book-tokens has become recognized as a

minor branch of a higher art, and there has come into fashion an

entirely new class of designs which, for all their wonderful variety,

bear as unmistakable a character as that of the most definite styles of

bygone days. Broadly speaking, it may be said that the purely heraldic

element tends to become subsidiary and the allegorical or symbolic to

assert itself more strongly. Among modern English artists who have more

specially paid attention to the devising of book-plates, and have

produced admirable designs, may be mentioned C.W. Sherborn, G.W. Eve,

Robert Anning Bell, J.D. Batten, Erat Harrison, J. Forbes Nixon, Charles

Ricketts, John Vinycomb, John Leighton and Warrington Hogg. The

development in various directions of process work, by facilitating and

cheapening the reproduction of beautiful and elaborate designs, has no

doubt helped much to popularize the book-plate--a thing which in older

days was almost invariably restricted to ancestral libraries or to

collections otherwise important. Thus the great majority of modern

plates are reproduced by process. There are, however, a few artists left

who devote to book-plates their skill with the graver. Some of the work

they produce challenges comparison with the finest productions of bygone

engravers. Of these the best-known are C.W. Sherborn (see Plate) and

G.W. Eve in England, and in America J.W. Spenceley of Boston, Mass.,

K.W.F. Hopson of New Haven, Conn., and E.D. French of New York City (see

Plate).

AUTHORITIES.--The curious in the matter of book-plate composition will

find it treated in the various volumes of the Ex-libris Series

(London). See also A. Poulet-Malassis, _Les Ex-libris francais_

(1875); Hon. J. Leicester Warren (Lord de Tabley), _A Guide to the

Study of Book-plates_ (1880); Sir A.W. Franks, _Notes on Book-plates_,

1574-1800 (private, 1887); Friedrich Warnecke, _Die deutschen

Bucherzeichen_ (1890); Henri Bouchot, _Les Ex-libris et les marques de

possession du livre_ (1891); Egerton Castle, _English Book-plates_

(1892); Walter Hamilton, _French Book-plates_ (1892), _Dated

Book-plates_ (1895); H.W. Fincham, _Artists and Engravers of British

and American Book-plates_ (1897); _German Book-plates_, by Count K.E.

zu Leiningen-Westerburg, translated by G.R. Denis (1901). (E. Ca.)

BOOK-SCORPION, or FALSE SCORPION, minute arachnids superficially

resembling tailless scorpions and belonging to the order

Pseudoscorpiones of the class Arachnida. Occurring in all temperate and

tropical countries, book-scorpions live for the most part under stones,

beneath the bark of trees or in vegetable detritus. A few species,

however, like the common British forms _Chelifer cancroides_ and

_Chiridium museorum_, frequent human dwellings and are found in books,

old chests, furniture, &c; others like _Ganypus littoralis_ and allied

species may be found under stones or pieces of coral between tide-marks;

while others, which are for the most part blind, live permanently in

dark caves. Their food consists of minute insects or mites. It is

possibly for the purpose of feeding on parasitic mites that

book-scorpions lodge themselves beneath the wing-cases of large tropical

beetles; and the same explanation, in default of a better, may be

extended to their well-known and oft-recorded habit of seizing hold of

the legs of horse-flies or other two-winged insects. For safety during

hibernation and moulting, book-scorpions spin a small spherical cocoon.

They are oviparous; and the eggs after being laid are carried about by

the mother, attached to the lower surface of her body, the young

remaining with their parent until they have acquired their definite

form and are able to shift for themselves. (R. I. P.)

BOOKSELLING. The trade in books is of a very ancient date. The early

poets and orators recited their effusions in public to induce their

hearers to possess written copies of their poems or orations. Frequently

they were taken down _viva voce_, and transcripts sold to such as were

wealthy enough to purchase. In the book of Jeremiah the prophet is

represented as dictating to Baruch the scribe, who, when questioned,

described the mode in which his book was written. These scribes were, in

fact, the earliest booksellers, and supplied copies as they were

demanded. Aristotle, we are told, possessed a somewhat extensive

library; and Plato is recorded to have paid the large sum of one hundred

minae for three small treatises of Philolaus the Pythagorean. When the

Alexandrian library was founded about 300 B.C., various expedients were

resorted to for the purpose of procuring books, and this appears to have

stimulated the energies of the Athenian booksellers, who were termed

[Greek: biblion kapaeloi]. In Rome, towards the end of the republic, it

became the fashion to have a library as part of the household furniture;

and the booksellers, _librarii_ (Cic. _D. Leg._ iii. 20) or

_bibliopolae_ (Martial iv. 71, xiii. 3), carried on a flourishing trade.

Their shops (_taberna librarii_, Cicero, _Phil._ ii. 9) were chiefly in

the Argiletum, and in the Vicus Sandalarius. On the door, or on the side

posts, was a list of the books on sale; and Martial (i. 118), who

mentions this also, says that a copy of his First Book of Epigrams might

be purchased for five denarii. In the time of Augustus the great

booksellers were the Sosii. According to Justinian (ii. I. 33), a law

was passed securing to the scribes the property in the materials used;

and in this may, perhaps, be traced the first germ of the modern law of

copyright.

The spread of Christianity naturally created a great demand for copies

of the Gospels and other sacred books, and later on for missals and

other devotional volumes for church and private use. Benedict Biscop,

the founder of the abbey at Wearmouth in England, brought home with him

from France (671) a whole cargo of books, part of which he had "bought,"

but from whom is not mentioned. Passing by the intermediate ages we find

that previous to the Reformation, the text writers or stationers

(_stacyoneres_), who sold copies of the books then in use--the ABC, the

Paternoster, Creed, Ave Maria and other MS. copies of prayers, in the

neighbourhood of St Paul's, London,--were, in 1403, formed into a gild.

Some of these "stacyoneres" had stalls or stations built against the

very walls of the cathedral itself, in the same manner as they are still

to be found in some of the older continental cities. In Henry Anstey's

_Munimenta Academica_, published under the direction of the master of

the rolls, we catch a glimpse of the "sworn" university bookseller or

stationer, John More of Oxford, who apparently first supplied pupils

with their books, and then acted the part of a pawnbroker. Anstey says

(p. 77), "The fact is that they (the students) mostly could not afford

to buy books, and had they been able, would not have found the advantage

so considerable as might be supposed, the instruction given being almost

wholly oral. The chief source of supplying books was by purchase from

the university sworn stationers, who had to a great extent a monopoly.

Of such books there were plainly very large numbers constantly changing

hands." Besides the sworn stationers there were many booksellers in

Oxford who were not sworn; for one of the statutes, passed in the year

1373, expressly recites that, in consequence of their presence, "books

of great value are sold and carried away from Oxford, the owners of them

are cheated, and the sworn stationers are deprived of their lawful

business." It was, therefore, enacted that no bookseller except two

sworn stationers or their deputies, should sell any book being either

his own property or that of another, exceeding half a mark in value,

under a pain of imprisonment, or, if the offence was repeated, of

abjuring his trade within the university.

"The trade in bookselling seems," says Hallam, "to have been established

at Paris and Bologna in the 12th century; the lawyers and universities

called it into life. It is very improbable that it existed in what we

properly call the dark ages. Peter of Blois mentions a book which he

had bought of a public dealer (_a quodam publico mangone librorum_); but

we do not find many distinct accounts of them till the next age. These

dealers were denominated _stationarii_, perhaps from the open stalls at

which they carried on their business, though _statio_ is a general word

for a shop in low Latin. They appear, by the old statutes of the

university of Paris, and by those of Bologna, to have sold books upon

commission, and are sometimes, though not uniformly, distinguished from

the _librarii_, a word which, having originally been confined to the

copyists of books, was afterwards applied to those who traded in them.

They sold parchment and other materials of writing, which have retained

the name of stationery, and they naturally exercised the kindred

occupations of binding and decorating. They probably employed

transcribers; we find at least that there was a profession of copyists

in the universities and in large cities."

The modern system of bookselling dates from soon after the introduction

of printing. The earliest printers were also editors and booksellers;

but being unable to sell every copy of the works they printed, they had

agents at most of the seats of learning. Antony Koburger, who introduced

the art of printing into Nuremberg in 1470, although a printer, was more

of a bookseller; for, besides his own sixteen shops, we are informed by

his biographers that he had agents for the sale of his books in every

city of Christendom. Wynkyn de Worde, who succeeded to Caxton's press in

Westminster, had a shop in Fleet Street.

The religious dissensions of the continent, and the Reformation in

England under Henry VIII. and Edward VI., created a great demand for

books; but in England neither Tudor nor Stuart could tolerate a free

press, and various efforts were made to curb it. The first patent for

the office of king's printer was granted to Thomas Berthelet by Henry

VIII. in 1529, but only such books as were first licensed were to be

printed. At that time even the purchase or possession of an unlicensed

book was a punishable offence. In 1556 the Company of Stationers was

incorporated, and very extensive powers were granted in order that

obnoxious books might be repressed. In the following reigns the Star

Chamber exercised a pretty effectual censorship; but, in spite of all

precaution, such was the demand for books of a polemical nature, that

many were printed abroad and surreptitiously introduced into England.

Queen Elizabeth interfered but little with books except when they

emanated from Roman Catholics, or touched upon her royal prerogatives;

and towards the end of her reign, and during that of her pedantic

successor, James, bookselling flourished. Archbishop Laud, who was no

friend to booksellers, introduced many arbitrary restrictions; but they

were all, or nearly all, removed during the time of the Commonwealth. So

much had bookselling increased during the Protectorate that, in 1658,

was published _A Catalogue of the most Vendible Books in England,

digested under the heads of Divinity, History, Physic, &c., with School

Books, Hebrew, Greek and Latin, and an Introduction, for the use of

Schools_, by W. London. A bad time immediately followed. The Restoration

also restored the office of Licenser of the Press, which continued till

1694.

In the first English Copyright Act (1709), which specially relates to

booksellers, it is enacted that, if any person shall think the published

price of a book unreasonably high, he may thereupon make complaint to

the archbishop of Canterbury, and to certain other persons named, who

shall thereupon examine into his complaint, and if well founded reduce

the price; and any bookseller charging more than the price so fixed

shall be fined L5 for every copy sold. Apparently this enactment

remained a dead letter.

For later times it is necessary to make a gradual distinction between

_booksellers_, whose trade consists in selling books, either by retail

or wholesale, and _publishers_, whose business involves the production

of the books from the author's manuscripts, and who are the

intermediaries between author and bookseller, just as the booksellers

(in the restricted sense) are intermediaries between the author and

publisher and the public. The article on PUBLISHING (q.v.) deals more

particularly with this second class, who, though originally booksellers,

gradually took a higher rank in the book-trade, and whose influence

upon the history of literature has often been very great. The

convenience of this distinction is not impaired by the fact either that

a publisher is also a wholesale bookseller, or that a still more recent

development in publishing (as in the instance of the direct sale in

1902, by the London _Times_, of the supplementary volumes to the 9th

edition of the _Encyclopaedia Britannica_, which were also "published"

by _The Times_) started a reaction to some extent in the way of

amalgamating the two functions. The scheme of _The Times_ Book Club

(started in 1905) was, again, a combination of a subscription library

with the business of bookselling (see NEWSPAPERS); and it brought the

organization of a newspaper, with all its means of achieving publicity,

into the work of pushing the sale of books, in a way which practically

introduced a new factor into the bookselling business.

During the 19th century it remains the fact that the distinction between

publisher and bookseller--literary promoter and shopkeeper--became

fundamental. The booksellers, as such, were engaged either in wholesale

bookselling, or in the retail, the old or second-hand, and the

periodical trades.

Coming between the publisher and the retail bookseller is the

important distributing agency of the _wholesale bookseller_. It is to

him that the retailer looks for his miscellaneous supplies, as it is

simply impossible for him to stock one-half of the books published. In

Paternoster Row, London, which has for over a hundred years been the

centre of this industry, may be seen the collectors from the shops of

the retail booksellers, busily engaged in obtaining the books ordered

by the book-buying public. It is also through these agencies that the

country bookseller obtains his miscellaneous supplies. At the leading

house in this department of bookselling almost any book can be found,

or information obtained concerning it. At one of these establishments

over 1,000,000 books are constantly kept in stock. It is here that the

publisher calls first on showing or "subscribing" a new book, a

critical process, for by the number thus subscribed the fate of a book

is sometimes determined.

What may be termed the third partner in publishing and its

ramification is the _retail bookseller_; and to protect his interests

there was established in 1890 a London booksellers' society, which had

for its object the restriction of discounts to 25%, and also to

arrange prices generally and control all details connected with the

trade. The society a few years afterwards widened its field of

operations so as to include the whole of the United Kingdom, and its

designation then became "The Associated Booksellers of Great Britain

and Ireland."

The trade in old or (as they are sometimes called) second-hand books

is in a sense, no doubt, a higher class of business, requiring a

knowledge of bibliography, while the transactions are with individual

books rather than with numbers of copies. Occasionally dealers in this

class of books replenish their stocks by purchasing remainders of

books, which, having ceased from one cause or another to sell with the

publisher, they offer to the public as bargains. The periodical trade

grew up during the 19th century, and was in its infancy when the

_Penny Magazine_, _Chambers's Journal_, and similar publications first

appeared. The growth of this important part of the business was

greatly promoted by the abolition of the newspaper stamp and of the

duty upon paper, the introduction of attractive illustrations, and the

facilities offered for purchasing books by instalments.

The history of bookselling in America has a special interest. The

Spanish settlements drew away from the old country much of its

enterprise and best talent, and the presses of Mexico and other cities

teemed with publications mostly of a religious character, but many

others, especially linguistic and historical, were also published.

Bookselling in the United States was of a somewhat later growth,

although printing was introduced into Boston as early as 1676,

Philadelphia in 1685, and New York in 1693. Franklin had served to make

the trade illustrious, yet few persons were engaged in it at the

commencement of the 19th century. Books chiefly for scholars and

libraries were imported from Europe; but after the second war

printing-presses multiplied rapidly, and with the spread of newspapers

and education there also arose a demand for books, and publishers set to

work to secure the advantages offered by the wide field of English

literature, the whole of which they had the liberty of reaping free of

all cost beyond that of production. The works of Scott, Byron, Moore,

Southey, Wordsworth, and indeed of every author of note, were reprinted

without the smallest payment to author or proprietor. Half the names of

the authors in the so-called "American" catalogue of books printed

between 1820 and 1852 are British. By this means the works of the best

authors were brought to the doors of all classes in the cheapest

variety of forms. In consequence of the Civil War, the high price of

labour, and the restrictive duties laid on in order to protect native

industry, coupled with the frequent intercourse with England, a great

change took place, and American publishers and booksellers, while there

was still no international copyright, made liberal offers for early

sheets of new publications. Boston, New York and Philadelphia still

retained their old supremacy as bookselling centres. Meanwhile, the

distinct publishing business also grew, till gradually the conditions of

business became assimilated to those of Europe.

In the course of the 16th and 17th centuries the Low Countries for a

time became the chief centre of the bookselling world, and many of the

finest folios and quartos in our libraries bear the names of Jansen,

Blauw or Plantin, with the imprint of Amsterdam, Utrecht, Leiden or

Antwerp, while the Elzevirs besides other works produced their charming

little pocket classics. The southern towns of Douai and St Omer at the

same time furnished polemical works in English.

Under PUBLISHING are noticed various further developments of this

subject. Much interesting information on the history of the book trade

will be found in Charles Knight's _Biography of William Caxton_, and

in the same author's _Shadows of the Old Booksellers_ (1865). See also

Henry Curwen, _History of Booksellers_ (1873); and Heinrich Lempertz,

_Bilder-Hefte zur Geschichte des Bucherhandels_ (Cologne, 1854).

BOOLE, GEORGE (1815-1864), English logician and mathematician, was born

in Lincoln on the 2nd of November 1815. His father was a tradesman of

limited means, but of studious character and active mind. Being

especially interested in mathematical science, the father gave his son

his first lessons; but the extraordinary mathematical powers of George

Boole did not manifest themselves in early life. At first his favourite

subject was classics. Not until the age of seventeen did he attack the

higher mathematics, and his progress was much retarded by the want of

efficient help. When about sixteen years of age he became

assistant-master in a private school at Doncaster, and he maintained

himself to the end of his life in one grade or other of the scholastic

profession. Few distinguished men, indeed, have had a less eventful

life. Almost the only changes which can be called events are his

successful establishment of a school at Lincoln, its removal to

Waddington, his appointment in 1849 as professor of mathematics in the

Queen's College at Cork, and his marriage in 1855 to Miss Mary Everest,

who, as Mrs Boole, afterwards wrote several useful educational works on

her husband's principles.

To the public Boole was known only as the author of numerous abstruse

papers on mathematical topics, and of three or four distinct

publications which have become standard works. His earliest published

paper was one upon the "Theory of Analytical Transformations," printed

in the _Cambridge Mathematical Journal_ for 1839, and it led to a

friendship between Boole and D.F. Gregory, the editor of the journal,

which lasted until the premature death of the latter in 1844. A long

list of Boole's memoirs and detached papers, both on logical and

mathematical topics, will be found in the _Catalogue of Scientific

Memoirs_ published by the Royal Society, and in the supplementary volume

on _Differential Equations_, edited by Isaac Todhunter. To the

_Cambridge Mathematical Journal_ and its successor, the _Cambridge and

Dublin Mathematical Journal_, Boole contributed in all twenty-two

articles. In the third and fourth series of the _Philosophical Magazine_

will be found sixteen papers. The Royal Society printed six important

memoirs in the _Philosophical Transactions_, and a few other memoirs are

to be found in the _Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh_ and

of the _Royal Irish Academy_, in the _Bulletin de l'Academie de

St-Petersbourg_ for 1862 (under the name G. Boldt, vol. iv. pp.

198-215), and in _Crelle's Journal_. To these lists should be added a

paper on the mathematical basis of logic, published in the _Mechanic's

Magazine_ for 1848. The works of Boole are thus contained in about fifty

scattered articles and a few separate publications.

Only two systematic treatises on mathematical subjects were completed by

Boole during his lifetime. The well-known _Treatise on Differential

Equations_ appeared in 1859, and was followed, the next year, by a

_Treatise on the Calculus of Finite Differences_, designed to serve as a

sequel to the former work. These treatises are valuable contributions to

the important branches of mathematics in question, and Boole, in

composing them, seems to have combined elementary exposition with the

profound investigation of the philosophy of the subject in a manner

hardly admitting of improvement. To a certain extent these works embody

the more important discoveries of their author. In the 16th and 17th

chapters of the _Differential Equations_ we find, for instance, a lucid

account of the general symbolic method, the bold and skilful employment

of which led to Boole's chief discoveries, and of a general method in

analysis, originally described in his famous memoir printed in the

_Philosophical Transactions_ for 1844. Boole was one of the most eminent

of those who perceived that the symbols of operation could be separated

from those of quantity and treated as distinct objects of calculation.

His principal characteristic was perfect confidence in any result

obtained by the treatment of symbols in accordance with their primary

laws and conditions, and an almost unrivalled skill and power in tracing

out these results.

During the last few years of his life Boole was constantly engaged in

extending his researches with the object of producing a second edition

of his _Differential Equations_ much more complete than the first

edition; and part of his last vacation was spent in the libraries of the

Royal Society and the British Museum. But this new edition was never

completed. Even the manuscripts left at his death were so incomplete

that Todhunter, into whose hands they were put, found it impossible to

use them in the publication of a second edition of the original

treatise, and wisely printed them, in 1865, in a supplementary volume.

With the exception of Augustus de Morgan, Boole was probably the first

English mathematician since the time of John Wallis who had also written

upon logic. His novel views of logical method were due to the same

profound confidence in symbolic reasoning to which he had successfully

trusted in mathematical investigation. Speculations concerning a

calculus of reasoning had at different times occupied Boole's thoughts,

but it was not till the spring of 1847 that he put his ideas into the

pamphlet called _Mathematical Analysis of Logic_. Boole afterwards

regarded this as a hasty and imperfect exposition of his logical system,

and he desired that his much larger work, _An Investigation of the Laws

of Thought, on which are founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and

Probabilities_ (1854), should alone be considered as containing a mature

statement of his views. Nevertheless, there is a charm of originality

about his earlier logical work which no competent reader can fail to

appreciate. He did not regard logic as a branch of mathematics, as the

title of his earlier pamphlet might be taken to imply, but he pointed

out such a deep analogy between the symbols of algebra and those which

can be made, in his opinion, to represent logical forms and syllogisms,

that we can hardly help saying that logic is mathematics restricted to

the two quantities, 0 and 1. By unity Boole denoted the universe of

thinkable objects; literal symbols, such as x, y, z, v, u, &c., were

used with the elective meaning attaching to common adjectives and

substantives. Thus, if x=horned and y=sheep, then the successive acts of

election represented by x and y, if performed on unity, give the whole

of the class _horned sheep_. Boole showed that elective symbols of this

kind obey the same primary laws of combination as algebraical symbols,

whence it followed that they could be added, subtracted, multiplied and

even divided, almost exactly in the same manner as numbers. Thus, 1 - x

would represent the operation of selecting all things in the world

except _horned things_, that is, _all not horned things_, and (1 - x)(1

- y) would give us _all things neither horned nor sheep_. By the use of

such symbols propositions could be reduced to the form of equations, and

the syllogistic conclusion from two premises was obtained by eliminating

the middle term according to ordinary algebraic rules.

Still more original and remarkable, however, was that part of his

system, fully stated in his _Laws of Thought_, which formed a general

symbolic method of logical inference. Given any propositions involving

any number of terms, Boole showed how, by the purely symbolic treatment

of the premises, to draw any conclusion logically contained in those

premises. The second part of the _Laws of Thought_ contained a

corresponding attempt to discover a general method in probabilities,

which should enable us from the given probabilities of any system of

events to determine the consequent probability of any other event

logically connected with the given events.

Though Boole published little except his mathematical and logical works,

his acquaintance with general literature was wide and deep. Dante was

his favourite poet, and he preferred the _Paradiso_ to the _Inferno_.

The metaphysics of Aristotle, the ethics of Spinoza, the philosophical

works of Cicero, and many kindred works, were also frequent subjects of

study. His reflections upon scientific, philosophical and religious

questions are contained in four addresses upon _The Genius of Sir Isaac

Newton_, _The Right Use of Leisure_, _The Claims of Science_ and _The

Social Aspect of Intellectual Culture_, which he delivered and printed

at different times.

The personal character of Boole inspired all his friends with the

deepest esteem. He was marked by the modesty of true genius, and his

life was given to the single-minded pursuit of truth. Though he received

a medal from the Royal Society for his memoir of 1844, and the honorary

degree of LL.D. from the university of Dublin, he neither sought nor

received the ordinary rewards to which his discoveries would entitle

him. On the 8th of December 1864, in the full vigour of his intellectual

powers, he died of an attack of fever, ending in suffusion on the lungs.

An excellent sketch of his life and works, by the Rev. R. Harley,

F.R.S., is to be found in the _British Quarterly Review_ for July

1866, No. 87. (W. S. J.)

BOOM, a word of Teutonic origin (cf. the Ger. _Baum_, tree, and the Eng.

_beam_) for a pole, bar or barrier, used especially as a nautical term,

for a long spar, used to extend a sail at the foot (main-boom, jib-boom,

&c.). The "boom" of a cannon (note of a bell, cry of the bittern) is

distinct from this, being onomatopoeic. In the sense of a barrier, a

boom is generally formed of timber lashed together, or of chains, built

across the mouth of a river or harbour as a means of defence. Possibly

from the metaphor of a breaking boom, and the accompanying rush and

roar, or from the rush of rising waters (mingled with the onomatopoeic

use), "boom" began in America to be used of a sudden "spurt" or access

of industrial activity, as in the phrase "a boom in cotton." Hence the

verb "to boom," meaning to advertise or push into public favour.

BOOMERANG, a missile weapon of the Australian aborigines and other

peoples. The word is taken from the native name used by a single tribe

in New South Wales, and was mentioned in 1827 by Captain King as "the

Port Jackson term" (_Nav. Surv. Coasts Austral._ i. 355) It has been

erroneously connected with the _womera_ or spear-thrower, and equally

erroneously regarded as onomatopoeic--for it does not "boom" but

whistles in the air. Two main types may be distinguished: (a) the return

boomerang; (b) the non-return or war boomerang. Both types are found in

most parts of Australia; the return form was, according to General

Pitt-Rivers, used in ancient Egypt; and a weapon which has a close

resemblance to the boomerang survives to the present day in North-East

Africa, whence it has spread in allied forms made of metal (throwing

knives). Among the Dravidians of South India is found a boomerang-shaped

instrument which can be made to return. It is, however, still uncertain

whether the so-called boomerangs of Egypt and India have any real

resemblance to the Australian return boomerang. The Hopis (Moquis) of

Arizona use a non-return form. The general form of both weapons is the

same. They are sickle-shaped, and made of wood (in India of ivory or

steel), so modelled that the thickness is about 1/6th of the breadth,

which again is 1/12th of the length, the last varying from 6 in. to 3 or

4 ft. The return boomerang, which may have two straight arms at an angle

of from 70 deg. to 120 deg., but in Australia is always curved at an

angle of 90 deg. or more, is usually 2 to 3 ft. in length and weighs

some 8 oz.; the arms have a skew, being twisted 2 deg. or 3 deg. from

the plane running through the centre of the weapon, so that B and D

(fig. 1) are above it, A and E below it; the ends AB and DE are also to

some extent raised above the plane of the weapon at C; the cross section

is asymmetrical, the upper side in the figure being convex, the lower

flat or nearly so; this must be thrown with the right hand. The

non-return boomerang has a skew in the opposite direction but is

otherwise similar.

[Illustration: FIG. 1.]

The peculiarity of the boomerang's flight depends mainly on its skew.

The return boomerang is held vertically, the concave side forward, and

thrown in a plane parallel to the surface of the ground, as much

rotation as possible being imparted to it. It travels straight for 30

yds. or more, with nearly vertical rotation; then it inclines to the

left, lying over on the flat side and rising in the air; after

describing a circle of 50 or more yards in diameter it returns to the

thrower. Some observers state that it returns after striking the object;

it is certainly possible to strike the ground without affecting the

return. Throws of 100 yds. or more, before the leftward curve begins,

can be accomplished by Australian natives, the weapon rising as much as

150 ft. in the air and circling five times before returning. The

non-return type may also be made to return in a nearly straight line by

throwing it at an angle of 45 deg., but normally it is thrown like the

return type, and will then travel an immense distance. No accurate

measurements of Australian throws are available, but an English throw of

180 yds. has been recorded, compared with the same thrower's 70 yds.

with the cricket ball.

[Illustration: FIG. 2.--Flight in Horizontal Plane.]

[Illustration: FIG. 3.--Flight in Vertical Plane.]

The war boomerang in an expert's hand is a deadly weapon, and the

lighter hunting boomerang is also effective. The return boomerang is

chiefly used as a plaything or for killing birds, and is often as

dangerous to the thrower as to the object at which it is aimed.

See Pitt-Rivers (Lane Fox) in _Anthropological and Archaeological

Fragments_, "Primitive Warfare"; also in _Journ. Royal United Service

Inst._ xii. No. 51; _British Ass. Report_ (1872); _Catalogue of

Bethnal Green Collection_, p. 28; Buchner in _Globus_, lxxxviii. 39,

63; G.T. Walker in _Phil. Trans._ cxc. 23; _Wide World Mag._ ii. 626;

_Nature_, xiv. 248, lxiv. 338; Brough Smyth, _Aborigines of Victoria_,

i. 310-329; Roth, _Ethnological Studies_. (N. W. T.)

BOONE, DANIEL (1734-1820), American pioneer and backwoodsman, of English

descent, was born near the present city of Reading, Pennsylvania, on the

2nd of November (N.S.) 1734. About 1751 his father, Squire Boone, with

his family settled in the Yadkin Valley in what is now Davie county,

North Carolina, then on the frontier. Daniel worked on his father's

farm, and spent much of his time hunting and trapping. In 1755 he served

as a wagoner and blacksmith in Braddock's disastrous expedition against

the Indians. In 1765 he visited Florida, and in 1767 he first visited

the Kentucky region. With several companions, including John Finley, who

had been there as early as 1752, he spent two years, 1769-1771, roaming

about what is now Kentucky, meeting with numberless adventures, coming

in conflict with roving bands of Indians, and collecting bear, beaver

and deer skins. He served in Lord Dunmore's War (1774), and in 1775 led

to Kentucky the party of settlers who founded Boonesborough, long an

important settlement. On the 7th of February 1778 he, and the party he

led, were captured by a band of Shawnees. He was adopted into the

Shawnee tribe, was taken to Detroit, and on the return from that place

escaped, reaching Boonesborough, after a perilous journey of 160 m.,

within four days, in time to give warning of a formidable attack by his

captors. In repelling this attack, which lasted from the 8th to the 17th

of September, he bore a conspicuous part. He also took part in the

sanguinary "Battle of Blue Licks" in 1782. For a time he represented the

settlers in the Virginia legislature (Kentucky then being a part of

Virginia), and he also served as deputy surveyor, sheriff and county

lieutenant of Fayette county, one of the three counties into which

Kentucky was then divided. Having lost all his land through his

carelessness in regard to titles, he removed in 1788 to Point Pleasant,

Virginia (now W. Va.), whence about 1799 he removed to a place in what

is now Missouri, about 45 m. west of St Louis, in territory then owned

by Spain. He received a grant of 1000 arpents (about 845 acres) of land,

and was appointed syndic of the district. After the United States gained

possession of "Louisiana" in 1803, Boone's title was found to be

defective, and he was again dispossessed. He died on the 22nd of

September 1820, and in 1845 his remains were removed to Frankfort,

Kentucky, where a monument has been erected to his memory. Boone was a

typical American pioneer and backwoodsman, a great hunter and trapper,

highly skilled in all the arts of woodcraft, familiar with the Indians

and their methods of warfare, a famous Indian fighter, restless,

resourceful and fearless. His services, however, have been greatly

over-estimated, and he was not, as is popularly believed, either the

first to explore or the first to settle the Kentucky region.

The best biography is that by Reuben G. Thwaites, _Daniel Boone_ (New

York, 1902).

BOONE, a city and the county-seat of Boone county, Iowa, U.S.A., a short

distance from the Des Moines river and near the centre of the state.

Pop. (1890) 6520; (1900) 8880; (1905, state census) 9500 (1334

foreign-born); (1910) 10,347. It is served by the Chicago &

North-Western (which has construction and repair shops here), the

Chicago, Milwaukee & St Paul railways, and by the Fort Dodge, Des Moines

& Southern (inter-urban) railway, which connects with Des Moines, Ames,

&c. Boone is an important coal centre; bricks and tiles are manufactured

from the clay obtained near by; there is a packing plant for the

manufacture of beef and pork products; and from the rich farming section

by which the city is surrounded come large quantities of grain, some of

which is milled here, and live-stock. Boone was laid out in 1865, was

incorporated as a town in 1866, and was chartered as a city in 1868.

BOONVILLE, a city and the county-seat of Cooper county, Missouri,

U.S.A., on the right bank of the Missouri river, about 210 m. W. by N.

of St Louis. Pop. (1890) 4141; (1900) 4377, including 1111 negroes;

(1910) 4252. It is served by the Missouri Pacific, and the Missouri,

Kansas & Texas railways. The city lies along a bluff about 100 ft. above

the river. It is the seat of the Missouri training school for boys

(1889), and of the Kemper military school (1844). Among its manufactures

are earthenware, tobacco, vinegar, flour, farm-gates (iron), sash and

doors, marble and granite monuments, carriages and bricks. Iron, zinc

and lead are found in the vicinity, and some coal is mined. Boonville,

named in honour of Daniel Boone, was settled in 1810, was laid out in

1817, incorporated as a village in 1839, and chartered as a city of the

third class in 1896. Here on the 17th of June 1861, Captain

(Major-General) Nathaniel Lyon, commanding about 2000 Union troops,

defeated a slightly larger, but undisciplined Confederate force under

Brigadier-General John S. Marmaduke. David Barton (d. 1837), one of the

first two United States senators from Missouri, was buried here.

BOORDE (or BORDE), ANDREW (1490?-1549), English physician and author,

was born at Boord's Hill, Holms Dale, Sussex. He was educated at Oxford,

and was admitted a member of the Carthusian order while under age. In

1521 he was "dispensed from religion" in order that he might act as

suffragan bishop of Chichester, though he never actually filled the

office, and in 1529 he was freed from his monastic vows, not being able

to endure, as he said, the "rugorosite off your relygyon." He then went

abroad to study medicine, and on his return was summoned to attend the

duke of Norfolk. He subsequently visited the universities of Orleans,

Poitiers, Toulouse, Montpellier and Wittenberg, saw the practice of

surgery at Rome, and went on pilgrimage with others of his nation to

Compostella in Navarre. In 1534 Boorde was again in London at the

Charterhouse, and in 1536 wrote to Thomas Cromwell, complaining that he

was in "thraldom" there. Cromwell set him at liberty, and after

entertaining him at his house at Bishops Waltham in Hampshire, seems to

have entrusted him with a mission to find out the state of public

feeling abroad with regard to the English king. He writes to Cromwell

from various places, and from Catalonia he sends him the seeds of

rhubarb, two hundred years before that plant was generally cultivated in

England. Two letters in 1535 and 1536 to the prior of the Charterhouse

anxiously argue for his complete release from monastic vows. In 1536 he

was studying medicine at Glasgow and gathering his observations about

the Scots and the "devellyshe dysposicion of a Scottysh man, not to love

nor favour an Englishe man." About 1538 Boorde set out on his most

extensive journey, visiting nearly all the countries of Europe except

Russia and Turkey, and making his way to Jerusalem. Of these travels he

wrote a full itinerary, lost unfortunately by Cromwell, to whom it was

sent. He finally settled at Montpellier and before 1542 had completed

his _Fyrst Boke of the Introduction of Knowledge_, which ranks as the

earliest continental guide book, his _Dietary_ and his _Brevyary_. He

probably returned to England in 1542, and lived at Winchester and

perhaps at Pevensey. John Ponet, bishop of Winchester, in an _Apology_

against Bishop Gardiner, relates as matter of common knowledge that in

1547 Doctor Boord, a physician and a holy man, who still kept the

Carthusian rules of fasting and wearing a hair shirt, was convicted in

Winchester of keeping in his house three loose women. For this offence,

apparently, he was imprisoned in the Fleet, where he made his will on

the 9th of April 1549. It was proved on the 25th of the same month.

Thomas Hearne (_Benedictus Abbas_, i, p. 52) says that he went round

like a quack doctor to country fairs, and therefore rashly supposed him

to have been the original merry-andrew.

Andrew Boorde was no doubt a learned physician, and he has left two

amusing and often sensible works on domestic hygiene and medicine, but

his most entertaining book is _The Fyrst Boke of the Introduction of

Knowledge. The whyche dothe teache a man to speake parte of all maner of

languages, and to know the usage and fashion of all maner of countreys.

And for to know the moste parte of all maner of coynes of money, the

whych is currant in every region. Made by Andrew Borde, of Physycke

Doctor. Dedycated to the right honourable, and gracious lady Mary

daughter of our soverayne Lorde Kyng Henry the eyght_ (c. 1547). The

Englishman describes himself and his foibles--his fickleness, his

fondness for new fashions and his obstinacy--in lively verse. Then

follows a geographical description of the country, followed by a model

dialogue in the Cornish language. Each country in turn is dealt with on

similar lines. His other authentic works are: _Here foloweth a

Compendyous Regimente or Dyetary of health, made in Mountpyllor_ (Thomas

Colwell, 1562), of which there are undated and doubtless earlier

editions; _The Brevyary of Health_ (1547?); _The Princyples of

Astronamy_ (1547?); "The Peregrination of Doctor Board," printed by

Thomas Hearne in _Benedictus Abbas Petroburgensis_, vol. ii. (1735); _A

Pronostycacyon or an Almanacke for the yere of our lorde MCCCCCXLV. made

by Andrew Boorde_. His _Itinerary of Europe_ and _Treatyse upon Berdes_

are lost. Several jest-books are attributed to him without

authority--_The Merie Tales of the Mad Men of Gotam_ (earliest extant

edition, 1630), _Scogin's Jests_ (1626), _A mery jest of the Mylner of

Abyngton, with his wyfe, and his daughter, and of two poore scholers of

Cambridge_ (printed by Wynkyn de Worde), and a Latin poem, _Nos

Vagabunduli_.

See Dr F.J. Furnivall's reprint of the _Introduction_ and some other

selections for the Early English Text Society (new series, 1870).

BOOS, MARTIN (1762-1825), German Roman Catholic theologian, was born at

Huttenried in Bavaria on the 25th of December 1762. Orphaned at the age

of four, he was reared by an uncle at Augsburg, who finally sent him to

the university of Dillingen. There he laid the foundation of the modest

piety by which his whole life was distinguished. After serving as priest

in several Bavarian towns, he made his way in 1799 to Linz in Austria,

where he was welcomed by Bishop Gall, and set to work first at Leonding

and then at Waldneukirchen, becoming in 1806 pastor at Gallneukirchen.

His pietistic movement won considerable way among the Catholic laity,

and even attracted some fifty or sixty priests. The death of Gall and

other powerful friends, however, exposed him to bitter enmity and

persecution from about 1812, and he had to answer endless accusations in

the consistorial courts. His enemies followed him when he returned to

Bavaria, but in 1817 the Prussian government appointed him to a

professorship at Dusseldorf, and in 1819 gave him the pastorate at Sayn

near Neuwied. He died on the 29th of August 1825.

See _Life_ by J. Gossner (1831).

BOOT, (1) (From the O. Eng. _bot_, a word common to Teutonic languages,

e.g. Goth, _bota_, "good, advantage," O.H.G. _Buoza_, Mod. Ger.

_Busse_, "penance, fine"; cf. "better," the comparative of "good"),

profit or advantage. The word survives in "bootless," i.e. useless or

unavailing, and in such expressions, chiefly archaistic, as "what boots

it?" "Bote," an old form, survives in some old compound legal words,

such as "house-bote," "fire-bote," "hedge-bote," &c., for particular

rights of "estover," the Norman French word corresponding to the Saxon

"bote" (see ESTOVERS and COMMONS). The same form survives also in such

expressions as "thief-bote" for the Old English customary compensation

paid for injuries.

(2) (A word of uncertain origin, which came into English through the O.

Fr. _bote_, modern _botte_; Med. Lat. _botta_ or _bota_), a covering for

the foot. Properly a boot covers the whole lower part of the leg,

sometimes reaching to or above the knee, but in common usage it is

applied to one which reaches only above the ankle, and is thus

distinguished from "shoe" (see COSTUME and SHOE).

The "boot" of a coach has the same derivation. It was originally applied

to the fixed outside step, the French _botte_, then to the uncovered

spaces on or beside the step on which the attendants sat facing

sideways. Both senses are now obsolete, the term now being applied to

the covered receptacles under the seats of the guard and coachman.

THE BOOT, BOOTS or BOOTIKIN was an instrument of torture formerly in use

to extort confessions from suspected persons, or obtain evidence from

unwilling witnesses. It originated in Scotland, but the date of its

first use is unknown. It was certainly frequently employed there in the

latter years of the 16th century. In a case of forgery in 1579 two

witnesses, a clergyman and an attorney, were so tortured. In a letter

dated 1583 at the Record Office in London, Walsingham instructs the

English ambassador at Edinburgh to have Father Holt, an English Jesuit,

"put to the boots." It seems to have fallen into disuse after 1630, but

was revived in 1666 on the occasion of the Covenanters' rebellion, and

was employed during the reigns of Charles II. and James II. Upon the

accession of William III. the Scottish convention denounced "the use of

torture, without evidence and in ordinary crimes, as contrary to law."

However, a year or so later, one Neville Payne, an Englishman suspected

of treasonable motives for visiting Scotland, was put to the torture

under the authority of a warrant signed by the king. This is the last

recorded case of its use, torture being finally abolished in Scotland in

1709. It was not used in England after 1640. The boot was made of iron

or wood and iron fastened on the leg, between which and the boot wedges

were driven by blows from a mallet. After each blow a question was put

to the victim, and the ordeal was continued until he gave the

information or fainted. The wedges were usually placed against the calf

of the leg, but Bishop Burnet says that they were sometimes put against

the shin-bone. A similar instrument, called "Spanish boots," was used in

Germany. There were also iron boots which were heated on the victim's

foot. A less cruel form was a boot or buskin made wet and drawn upon the

legs and then dried with fire.

BOOTES (Gr. [Greek: bootaes], a ploughman, from [Greek: bous], an ox), a

constellation of the northern hemisphere, mentioned by Eudoxus (4th

century B.C.) and Aratus (3rd century B.C.), and perhaps alluded to in

the book of Job (see ARCTURUS), and by Homer and Hesiod. The ancient

Greeks symbolized it as a man walking, with his right hand grasping a

club, and his left extending upwards and holding the leash of two dogs,

which are apparently barking at the Great Bear. Ptolemy catalogues

twenty-three stars, Tycho Brahe twenty-eight, Hevelius fifty-two. In

addition to Arcturus, the brightest in the group, the most interesting

stars of this constellation are: _[epsilon] Bootis_, a beautiful double

star composed of a yellow star of magnitude 3, and a blue star of

magnitude 6-1/2; _[xi] Bootis_, a double star composed of a yellow star,

magnitude 4-1/2, and a purple star, magnitude 6-1/2; and _W. Bootis_, an

irregularly variable star. This constellation has been known by many

other names--Arcas, Arctophylax, Arcturus minor, Bubuleus, Bubulus,

Canis latrans, Clamator, Icarus, Lycaon, Philometus, Plaustri custos,

Plorans, Thegnis, Vociferator; the Arabs termed it Aramech or Archamech;

Hesychius named it Orion; Jules Schiller, St Sylvester; Schickard,

Nimrod; and Weigelius, the Three Swedish Crowns.

BOOTH, BARTON (1681-1733), English actor, who came of a good Lancashire

family, was educated at Westminster school, where his success in the

Latin play _Andria_ gave him an inclination for the stage. He was

intended for the church; but in 1698 he ran away from Trinity College,

Cambridge, and obtained employment in a theatrical company in Dublin,

where he made his first appearance as Oroonoko. After two seasons in

Ireland he returned to London, where Betterton, who on an earlier

application had withheld his active aid, probably out of regard for

Booth's family, now gave him all the assistance in his power. At

Lincoln's Inn Fields (1700-1704) he first appeared as Maximus in

_Valentinian_, and his success was immediate. He was at the Haymarket

with Betterton from 1705 to 1708, and for the next twenty years at Drury

Lane. Booth died on the 10th of May 1733, and was buried in Westminster

Abbey. His greatest parts, after the title-part of Addison's _Cato_,

which established his reputation as a tragedian, were probably Hotspur

and Brutus. His Lear was deemed worthy of comparison with Garrick's. As

the ghost in _Hamlet_ he is said never to have had a superior. Among his

other Shakespearian roles were Mark Antony, Timon of Athens and Othello.

He also played to perfection the gay Lothario in Rowe's _Fair Penitent_.

Booth was twice married; his second wife, Hester Santlow, an actress of

some merit, survived him.

See Cibber, _Lives and Characters of the most eminent Actors and

Actresses_ (1753); Victor, _Memoirs of the Life of Barton Booth_

(1733).

BOOTH, CHARLES (1840- ), English sociologist, was born at Liverpool on

the 30th of March 1840. In 1862 he became a partner in Alfred Booth &

Company, a Liverpool firm engaged in the Brazil trade, and subsequently

chairman of the Booth Steamship Company. He devoted much time, and no

inconsiderable sums of money, to inquiries into the statistical aspects

of social questions. The results of these are chiefly embodied in a work

entitled _Life and Labour of the People in London_ (1891-1903), of which

the earlier portion appeared under the title of _Life and Labour_ in

1889. The book is designed to show "the numerical relation which

poverty, misery and depravity bear to regular earnings and comparative

comfort, and to describe the general conditions under which each class

lives." It contains a most striking series of maps, in which the varying

degrees of poverty are represented street by street, by shades of

colour. The data for the work were derived in part from the detailed

records kept by school-board "visitors," partly from systematic

inquiries directed by Mr Booth himself, supplemented by information

derived from relieving officers and the Charity Organization Society. Mr

Booth also paid much attention to a kindred subject--the lot of the aged

poor. In 1894 he published a volume of statistics on the subject, and,

in 1891 and 1899, works on Old-age pensions, his scheme for the latter

depending on a general provision of pensions of five shillings a week to

all aged persons, irrespective of the cost to the state. He married, in

1871, the daughter of Charles Zachary Macaulay. In 1904 he was made a

privy councillor.

BOOTH, EDWIN [THOMAS] (1833-1893), American actor, was the second son of

the actor Junius Brutus Booth, and was born in Belair, Maryland, on the

13th of November 1833. His father (1796-1852) was born in London on the

1st of May 1796, and, after trying printing, law, painting and the sea,

made his first appearance on the stage in 1813, and appeared in London

at Covent Garden in 1815. He became almost at once a great favourite,

and a rival of Kean, whom he was thought to resemble. To Kean's Othello

nevertheless he played Iago on several occasions. Richard III., Hamlet,

King Lear, Shylock and Sir Giles Overreach were his best parts, and in

America, whither he removed in 1821, they brought him great popularity.

His eccentricities sometimes bordered on insanity, and his excited and

furious fencing as Richard III. and as Hamlet frequently compelled the

Richmond and Laertes to fight for their lives in deadly earnest.

Edwin Booth's first regular appearance was at the Boston Museum on the

10th of September 1849, as Tressel to his father's Richard, in Colley

Cibber's version of _Richard III._ He was lithe and graceful in figure,

buoyant in spirits; his dark hair fell in waving curls across his brow,

and his eyes were soft, luminous and most expressive. His father watched

him with great interest, but with evident disappointment, and the

members of the theatrical profession, who held the acting of the elder

Booth in great reverence, seemed to agree that the genius of the father

had not descended to the son. Edwin Booth's first appearance in New York

was in the character of Wilford in _The Iron Chest_, which he played at

the National theatre in Chatham Street, on the 27th of September 1850. A

year later, on the illness of the father, the son took his place in the

character of Richard III. It was not until after his parent's death that

the son conquered for himself an unassailable position on the stage.

Between 1852 and 1856 he played in California, Australia and the

Sandwich Islands, and those who had known him in the east were surprised

when the news came that he had captivated his audiences with his

brilliant acting. From this time forward his dramatic triumphs were

warmly acknowledged. His Hamlet, Richard and Richelieu were pronounced

to be superior to the performances of Edwin Forrest; his success as Sir

Giles Overreach in _A New Way to Pay Old Debts_ surpassed his father's.

In 1862 he became manager of the Winter Garden theatre, New York, where

he gave a series of Shakespearian productions of then unexampled

magnificence (1864-1867), including _Hamlet_, _Othello_ and _The

Merchant of Venice_. The splendour of this period in his career was

dashed for many months when in 1865 his brother, John Wilkes Booth,

assassinated President Lincoln (see LINCOLN, ABRAHAM). The three Booth

brothers, Junius Brutus (1821-1853), Edwin and John Wilkes (1839-1865),

had played together in _Julius Caesar_ in the autumn of the previous

year--the performance being memorable both for its own excellence, and

for the tragic situation into which two of the principal performers were

subsequently hurled by the crime of the third. Edwin Booth did not

reappear on the stage until the 3rd of January 1866, when he played

Hamlet at the Winter Garden theatre, the audience showing by unstinted

applause their conviction that the glory of the one brother would never

be imperilled by the infamy of the other.

In 1868-1869 Edwin Booth built a theatre of his own--Booth's theatre, at

the corner of 23rd Street and 6th Avenue, New York--and organized an

excellent stock company, which produced _Romeo and Juliet_, _The

Winter's Tale_, _Julius Caesar_, _Macbeth_, _Much Ado about Nothing_,

_The Merchant of Venice_ and other plays. In all cases Booth used the

true text of Shakespeare, thus antedating by many years a similar reform

in England. Almost invariably his ventures were successful, but he was

of a generous and confiding nature, and his management was not

economical. In 1874 the grand dramatic structure he had raised was taken

from him, and with it went his entire fortune. By arduous toil,

however, he again accumulated wealth, in the use of which his generous

nature was shown. He converted his spacious residence in Gramercy Park,

New York, into a club--The Players'--for the elect of his profession,

and for such members of other professions as they might choose. The

house, with all his books and works of art, and many invaluable mementos

of the stage, became the property of the club. A single apartment he

kept for himself. In this he died on the 7th of June 1893. Among his

parts were Macbeth, Lear, Othello, Iago, Shylock, Wolsey, Richard II.,

Richard III., Benedick, Petruccio, Richelieu, Sir Giles Overreach,

Brutus (Payne's), Bertuccio (in Tom Taylor's _The Fool's Revenge_), Ruy

Blas, Don Cesar de Bazan, and many more. His most famous part was

Hamlet, for which his extraordinary grace and beauty and his eloquent

sensibility peculiarly fitted him. He probably played the part oftener

than any other actor before or since. He visited London in 1851, and

again in 1880 and in 1882, playing at the Haymarket theatre with

brilliant success. In the last year he also visited Germany, where his

acting was received with the highest enthusiasm. His last appearance was

in Brooklyn as Hamlet in 1891. Booth was twice married: in 1860 to Mary

Devlin (d. 1863), and in 1869 to Mary F. McVicker (d. 1881). He left by

his first wife one daughter, Edwina Booth Grossman, who published _Edwin

Booth: Recollections_ (New York, 1894).

Edwin Booth's prompt-books were edited by William Winter (1878). In a

series of volumes, _Actors and Actresses of Great Britain and

America_, edited by Lawrence Hutton and Brander Matthews, Edwin Booth

contributed recollections of his father, which contain much valuable

autobiographic material. For the same series Lawrence Barrett

contributed an article on Edwin Booth. See also William Winter, _Life

and Art of Edwin Booth_ (1893); Lawrence Hutton, _Edwin Booth_ (1893);

Henry A. Clapp, _Reminiscences of a Dramatic Critic_ (Boston, 1902);

A.B. Clarke. _The Elder and the Younger Booth_ (Boston, 1882).

(J. J.*)

BOOTH, WILLIAM (1829- ), founder and "general" of the Salvation Army

(q.v.), was born at Nottingham on the 10th of April 1829. At the age

of fifteen his mind took a strongly religious turn, under the influence

of the Wesleyan Methodists, in which body he became a local preacher. In

1849 he came to London, where, according to his own account, his passion

for open-air preaching caused his severance from the Wesleyans. Joining

the Methodist New Connexion, he was ordained a minister, but, not being

employed as he wished in active "travelling evangelization," left that

body also in 1861. Meanwhile he had (1855) married Miss Catherine

Mumford, and had a family of four children. Both he and his wife

occupied themselves with preaching, first in Cornwall and then in

Cardiff and Walsall. At the last-named place was first organized a

"Hallelujah band" of converted criminals and others, who testified in

public of their conversion. In 1864 Booth went to London and continued

his services in tents and in the open air, and founded a body which was

successively known as the East London Revival Society, the East London

Christian Mission, the Christian Mission and (in 1878) the Salvation

Army. The Army operates (1) by outdoor meetings and processions; (2) by

visiting public-houses, prisons, private houses; (3) by holding meetings

in theatres, factories and other unusual buildings; (4) by using the

most popular song-tunes and the language of everyday life, &c.; (5) by

making every convert a daily witness for Christ, both in public and

private. The army is a quasi-military organization, and Booth modelled

its "Orders and Regulations" on those of the British army. Its early

"campaigns" excited violent opposition, a "Skeleton Army" being

organized to break up the meetings, and for many years Booth's followers

were subjected to fine and imprisonment as breakers of the peace. Since

1889, however, these disorders have been little heard of. The operations

of the army were extended in 1880 to the United States, in 1881 to

Australia, and spread to the European continent, to India, Ceylon and

elsewhere, "General" Booth himself being an indefatigable traveller,

organizer and speaker. His wife (b. 1829) died in 1890. By her preaching

at Gateshead, where her husband was circuit minister, in 1860, she began

the women's ministry which is so prominent a feature of the army's work.

A biography of her by Mr Booth Tucker appeared in 1892.

In 1890 "General" Booth attracted further public attention by the

publication of a work entitled _In Darkest England, and the Way Out_, in

which he proposed to remedy pauperism and vice by a series of ten

expedients: (1) the city colony; (2) the farm colony; (3) the over-sea

colony; (4) the household salvage brigade; (5) the rescue homes for

fallen women; (6) deliverance for the drunkard; (7) the prison-gate

brigade; (8) the poor man's bank; (9) the poor man's lawyer; (10)

Whitechapel-by-the-Sea. Money was liberally subscribed and a large part

of the scheme was carried out. The opposition and ridicule with which

Booth's work was for many years received gave way, towards the end of

the 19th century, to very widespread sympathy as his genius and its

results were more fully realized.

The active encouragement of King Edward VII., at whose instance in 1902

he was invited officially to be present at the coronation ceremony,

marked the completeness of the change; and when, in 1905, the "general"

went on a progress through England, he was received in state by the

mayors and corporations of many towns. In the United States also, and

elsewhere, his work was cordially encouraged by the authorities.

See T.F. Coates, _The Life Story of General Booth_ (2nd ed., London,

1906), and bibliography under SALVATION ARMY.

BOOTH (connected with a Teutonic root meaning to dwell, whence also

"bower"), primarily a temporary dwelling of boughs or other slight

materials. Later the word gained the special meaning of a market stall

or any non-permanent erection, such as a tent at a fair, where goods

were on sale. Later still it was applied to the temporary structure

where votes were registered, viz. polling-booth. Temporary booths

erected for the weekly markets naturally tended to become permanent

shops. Thus Stow states that the houses in Old Fish Street, London,

"were at first but movable boards set out on market days to show their

fish there to be sold; but procuring licence to set up sheds, they grew

to shops, and by little and little, to tall houses." As _bothy_ or

_bothie_, in Scotland, meaning generally a hut or cottage, the word was

specially applied to a barrack-like room on large farms where the

unmarried labourers were lodged. This, known as the _Bothy system_, was

formerly common in Aberdeenshire and other parts of northern Scotland.

BOOTHIA (_Boothia Felix_), a peninsula of British North America,

belonging to Franklin district, and having an area of 13,100 sq. m.,

between 69 deg. 30' and 71 deg. 50' N. and 91 deg. 30' and 97 deg. W.

Its northernmost promontory, Murchison Point, is also the northernmost

point of the American mainland. It was discovered by Captain (afterwards

Sir James) Ross, during his expedition of 1829-1833, and was named after

Sir Felix Booth, who had been chiefly instrumental in fitting out the

expedition. Boothia forms the western side of Boothia Gulf. From the

main mass of the continent the peninsula is almost separated by lakes

and inlets; and a narrow channel known as Bellot Strait intervenes

between it and North Somerset Island, which was discovered by Sir E.

Parry in 1819. The peninsula is not only interesting for its connexion

with the Franklin expedition and the Franklin search, but is of

scientific importance from the north magnetic pole having been first

distinctly localized here by Ross, on the western side, in 70 deg. 5'

N., 96 deg. 47' W.

Boothia Gulf separates the north-western portion of Baffin Land and

Melville Peninsula from Boothia Peninsula. It is connected with Barrow

Strait and Lancaster Sound by Prince Regent Inlet, with Franklin Strait

by Bellot Strait, and with Fox Channel by Fury and Hecla Strait. The

principal bays are Committee and Pelly in the southern portion, and Lord

Mayor in the western.

BOOTLE, a municipal and county borough in the Bootle parliamentary

division of Lancashire, England; at the mouth of the Mersey, forming a

northern suburb of Liverpool. Pop. (1901) 58,566; an increase by nearly

nine times in forty years. The great docks on this, the east bank of the

Mersey, extend into the borough, but are considered as a whole under

LIVERPOOL (q.v.). Such features, moreover, as communications,

water-supply, &c., may be considered as part of the greater systems of

the same city. The chief buildings and institutions are a handsome town

hall, a museum, free libraries, technical schools, and several public

pleasure grounds. Bootle was incorporated in 1868 and was created a

county borough in 1888; the corporation consists of a mayor, 10 aldermen

and 30 councillors. A proposal to include it within the city of

Liverpool was rejected in parliament in July 1903. Area, 1576 acres.

BOOTY (apparently influenced by "boot," 0. Eng. _bot_, advantage or

profit, through an adaptation from an earlier form cognate with Ger.

_Beute_ and Fr. _butin_), plunder or gain. The phrase "to play booty,"

dating from the 16th century, means to play into a confederate's hands,

or to play intentionally badly at first in order to deceive an opponent.

BOPP, FRANZ (1791-1867), German philologist, was born at Mainz on the

14th of September 1791. In consequence of the political troubles of that

time, his parents removed to Aschaffenburg, in Bavaria, where he

received a liberal education at the Lyceum. It was here that his

attention was drawn to the languages and literature of the East by the

eloquent lectures of Karl J. Windischmann, who, with G.F. Creuzer, J.J.

Gorres, and the brothers Schlegel, was full of enthusiasm for Indian

wisdom and philosophy. And further, Fr. Schlegel's book, _Uber die

Sprache und Weisheit der Indier_ (Heidelberg, 1808), which was just then

exerting a powerful influence on the minds of German philosophers and

historians, could not fail to stimulate also Bopp's interest in the

sacred language of the Hindus. In 1812 he went to Paris at the expense

of the Bavarian government, with a view to devote himself vigorously to

the study of Sanskrit. There he enjoyed the society of such eminent men

as A.L. Chezy, S. de Sacy, L.M. Langles, and, above all, of Alexander

Hamilton (1762-1824), who had acquired, when in India, an acquaintance

with Sanskrit, and had brought out, conjointly with Langles, a

descriptive catalogue of the Sanskrit manuscripts of the Imperial

library. At that library Bopp had access not only to the rich collection

of Sanskrit manuscripts, most of which had been brought from India by

Father Pons early in the 18th century, but also to the Sanskrit books

which had up to that time issued from the Calcutta and Serampore

presses. The first fruit of his four years' study in Paris appeared at

Frankfort-On-Main in 1816, under the title _Uber das Conjugationssystem

der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen,

lateinischen, persischen und germanischen Sprache_, and it was

accompanied with a preface from the pen of Windischmann. In this first

book Bopp entered at once on the path on which the philological

researches of his whole subsequent life were concentrated. It was not

that he wished to prove the common parentage of Sanskrit with Persian,

Greek, Latin and German, for that had long been established; but his

object was to trace the common origin of their grammatical forms, of

their inflections from composition,--a task which had never been

attempted. By a historical analysis of those forms, as applied to the

verb, he furnished the first trustworthy materials for a history of the

languages compared.

After a brief sojourn in Germany, Bopp came to London, where he made the

acquaintance of Sir Charles Wilkins and H.T. Colebrooke, and became the

friend of Wilhelm von Humboldt, then Prussian ambassador at the court of

St James's, to whom he gave instruction in Sanskrit. He brought out, in

the _Annals of Oriental Literature_ (London, 1820), an essay entitled,

"Analytical Comparison of the Sanskrit, Greek, Latin and Teutonic

Languages," in which he extended to all parts of the grammar what he had

done in his first book for the verb alone. He had previously published a

critical edition, with a Latin translation and notes, of the story of

_Nala and Damayanti_ (London, 1819), the most beautiful episode of the

Mahabharata. Other episodes of the Mahabharata--_Indralokagamanam_,

and three others (Berlin, 1824); _Diluvium_, and three others (Berlin,

1829); and a new edition of _Nala_ (Berlin, 1832)--followed in due

course, all of which, with A.W. Schlegel's edition of the _Bhagavadgita_

(1823), proved excellent aids in initiating the early student into the

reading of Sanskrit texts. On the publication, in Calcutta, of the whole

Mahabharata, Bopp discontinued editing Sanskrit texts, and confined

himself thenceforth exclusively to grammatical investigations.

After a short residence at Gottingen, Bopp was, on the recommendation of

Humboldt, appointed to the chair of Sanskrit and comparative grammar at

Berlin in 1821, and was elected member of the Royal Prussian Academy in

the following year. He brought out, in 1827, his _Ausfuhrliches

Lehrgebaude der Sanskrita-Sprache_, on which he had been engaged since

1821. A new edition, in Latin, was commenced in the following year, and

completed in 1832; and a shorter grammar appeared in 1834. At the same

time he compiled a Sanskrit and Latin glossary (1830) in which, more

especially in the second and third editions (1847 and 1867), account was

also taken of the cognate languages. His chief activity, however,

centred on the elaboration of his _Comparative Grammar_, which appeared

in six parts at considerable intervals (Berlin, 1833, 1835, 1842, 1847,

1849, 1852), under the title _Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit,

Zend, Griechischen, Lateinischen, Litthauischen, Altslavischen,

Gothischen, und Deutschen_. How carefully this work was matured may be

gathered from the series of monographs printed in the _Transactions of

the Berlin Academy_ (1824 to 1831), by which it was preceded. They bear

the general title, _Vergleichende Zergliederung des Sanskrits und der

mit ihm verwandten Sprachen_. Two other essays (on the "Numerals," 1835)

followed the publication of the first part of the _Comparative Grammar_.

The Old-Slavonian began to take its stand among the languages compared

from the second part onwards. The work was translated into English by

E.B. Eastwick in 1845. A second German edition, thoroughly revised

(1856-1861), comprised also the Old-Armenian. From this edition an

excellent French translation was made by Professor Michel Breal in 1866.

The task which Bopp endeavoured to carry out in his _Comparative

Grammar_ was threefold,--to give a description of the original

grammatical structure of the languages as deduced from their

intercomparison, to trace their phonetic laws, and to investigate the

origin of their grammatical forms. The first and second points were

subservient to the third. As Bopp's researches were based on the best

available sources, and incorporated every new item of information that

came to light, so they continued to widen and deepen in their progress.

Witness his monographs on the vowel system in the Teutonic languages

(1836), on the Celtic languages (1839), on the Old-Prussian (1853) and

Albanian languages (1854), on the accent in Sanskrit and Greek (1854),

on the relationship of the Malayo-Polynesian with the Indo-European

languages (1840), and on the Caucasian languages (1846). In the two last

mentioned the impetus of his genius led him on a wrong track. Bopp has

been charged with neglecting the study of the native Sanskrit grammars,

but in those early days of Sanskrit studies the requisite materials were

not accessible in the great libraries of Europe; and if they had been,

they would have absorbed his exclusive attention for years, while such

grammars as those of Wilkins and Colebrooke, from which his grammatical

knowledge was derived, were all based on native grammars. The further

charge that Bopp, in his _Comparative Grammar_, gave undue prominence to

Sanskrit may be disproved by his own words; for, as early as the year

1820, he gave it as his opinion that frequently the cognate languages

serve to elucidate grammatical forms lost in Sanskrit (_Annals of Or.

Lit._ i. 3),--an opinion which he further developed in all his

subsequent writings.

Bopp's researches, carried with wonderful penetration into the most

minute and almost microscopical details of linguistic phenomena, have

led to the opening up of a wide and distant view into the original

seats, the closer or more distant affinity, and the tenets, practices

and domestic usages of the ancient Indo-European nations, and the

science of comparative grammar may truly be said to date from his

earliest publication. In grateful recognition of that fact, on the

fiftieth anniversary (May 16, 1866) of the date of Windischmann's

preface to that work, a fund called _Die Bopp-Stiftung_, for the

promotion of the study of Sanskrit and comparative grammar, was

established at Berlin, to which liberal contributions were made by his

numerous pupils and admirers in all parts of the globe. Bopp lived to

see the results of his labours everywhere accepted, and his name justly

celebrated. But he died, on the 23rd of October 1867, a poor

man,--though his genuine kindliness and unselfishness, his devotion to

his family and friends, and his rare modesty, endeared him to all who

knew him.

See M. Breal's translation of Bopp's _Vergl. Gramm._ (1866)

introduction; Th. Benfey, _Gesch. der Sprachwissenschaft_ (1869); A.

Kuhn in _Unsere Zeit_, Neue Folge, iv. i (1868); Lefmann, _Franz Bopp_

(Berlin, 1891-1897).

BOPPARD, a town of Germany, in the Prussian Rhine province, on the left

bank of the Rhine, 12 m. S. of Coblenz on the mainline to Cologne. Pop.

(1900) 5806. It is an old town still partly surrounded by medieval

walls, and its most noteworthy buildings are the Roman Catholic parish

church (12th and 13th centuries); the Carmelite church (1318), the

former castle, now used for administrative offices; the Evangelical

church (1851, enlarged in 1887); and the former Benedictine motnastery

of the Marienberg, founded 1123 and since 1839 a hydropathic

establishment, crowning a hill 100 ft. above the Rhine. Boppard is a

favourite tourist centre, and being less pent in by hills than many

other places in this part of the picturesque gorge of the Rhine, has in

modern times become a residential town. It has some comparatively

insignificant industries, such as tanning and tobacco manufacture; its

direct trade is in wine and fruit.

Boppard (_Baudobriga_) was founded by the Romans; under the Merovingian

dynasty it became a royal residence. During the middle ages it was a

considerable centre of commerce and shipping, and under the Hohenstaufen

emperors was raised to the rank of a free imperial city. In 1312,

however, the emperor Henry VII. pledged the town to his brother Baldwin,

archbishop-elector of Trier, and it remained in the possession of the

electors until it was absorbed by France during the Revolutionary epoch.

It was assigned by the congress of Vienna in 1815 to Prussia.

BORA, an Italian name for a violent cold northerly and northeasterly

wind, common in the Adriatic, especially on the Istrian and Dalmatian

coasts. There is always a northern tendency in the winds on the north

Mediterranean shores in winter owing to the cold air of the mountains

sliding down to the sea where the pressure is less. When, therefore, a

cyclone is formed over the Mediterranean, the currents in its

north-western area draw the air from the cold northern regions, and

during the passage of the cyclone the bora prevails. The bora also

occurs at Novorossiysk on the Black Sea. It is precisely similar in

character to the mistral which prevails in Provence and along the French

Mediterranean littoral.

BORACITE, a mineral of special interest on account of its optical

anomalies. Small crystals bounded on all sides by sharply defined faces

are found in considerable numbers embedded in gypsum and anhydrite in

the salt deposits at Luneburg in Hanover, where it was first observed in

1787. In external form these crystals are cubic with inclined

hemihedrism, the symmetry being the same as in blende and tetrahedrite.

Their habit varies according to whether the tetrahedron (fig. 1), the

cube (fig. 2). or the rhombic dodecahedron (fig. 3) predominates.

Penetration twins with a tetrahedron face as twin-plane are sometimes

observed. The crystals vary from translucent to transparent, are

possessed of a vitreous lustre, and are colourless or white, though

often tinged with grey, yellow or green. The hardness is as high as 7 on

Mohs' scale; specific gravity 3.0. As first observed by R.J. Hauy in

1791, the crystals are markedly pyroelectric; a cube when heated becomes

positively electrified on four of its corners and negatively on the four

opposite corners. In a crystal such as represented in fig. 3, the

smaller and dull tetrahedral faces s are situated at the analogous poles

(which become positively electrified when the crystal is heated), and

the larger and bright tetrahedral faces _s'_ at the antilogous poles.

[Illustration: Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Bohemia" to "Borgia, Francis" Volume 4, Slice 2 · 第 56 / 57 题