THE LANDING AT PLYMOUTH.

A SPEECH DELIVERED ON THE 22d OF DECEMBER, 1843, AT THE PUBLIC DINNER OF

THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, IN COMMEMORATION OF THE LANDING OF

THE PILGRIMS.

[The great Pilgrim festival was celebrated on the 22d of December, 1843,

by the New England Society of New York, with uncommon spirit and

success. A commemorative oration was delivered in the morning by Hon.

Rufus Choate, in a style of eloquence rarely equalled. The public dinner

of the Society, at the Astor House, at which M.H. Grinnell, Esq.

presided, was attended by a very large company, composed of the members

of the Society and their invited guests. Several appropriate toasts

having been given and responded to by the distinguished individuals

present, George Griswold, Esq. rose to offer one in honor of Mr.

Webster. After a few remarks complimentary to that gentleman, in

reference to his services in refuting the doctrine of nullification and

in averting the danger of war by the treaty of Washington, Mr. Griswold

gave the following toast:--

"DANIEL WEBSTER,--the gift of New England to his country, his whole

country, and nothing but his country."

This was received with great applause, and on rising to respond to it

Mr. Webster was greeted with nine enthusiastic cheers, and the most

hearty and prolonged approbation. When silence was restored, he spoke as

follows.]

MR. PRESIDENT:--I have a grateful duty to perform in acknowledging the

kindness of the sentiment thus expressed towards me. And yet I must say,

Gentlemen, that I rise upon this occasion under a consciousness that I

may probably disappoint highly raised, too highly raised expectations.

In the scenes of this evening, and in the scene of this day, my part is

an humble one. I can enter into no competition with the fresher geniuses

of those more eloquent gentlemen, learned and reverend, who have

addressed this Society. I may perform, however, the humbler, but

sometimes useful, duty of contrast, by adding the dark ground of the

picture, which shall serve to bring out the more brilliant colors.

I must receive, Gentlemen, the sentiment proposed by the worthy and

distinguished citizen of New York before me, as intended to convey the

idea that, as a citizen of New England, as a son, a child, a _creation_

of New England, I may be yet supposed to entertain, in some degree, that

enlarged view of my duty as a citizen of the United States and as a

public man, which may, in some small measure, commend me to the regard

of the whole country. While I am free to confess, Gentlemen, that there

is no compliment of which I am more desirous to be thought worthy, I

will add, that a compliment of that kind could have proceeded from no

source more agreeable to my own feelings than from the gentleman who has

proposed it,--an eminent merchant, the member of a body of eminent

merchants, known throughout the world for their intelligence and

enterprise. I the more especially feel this, Gentlemen, because, whether

I view the present state of things or recur to the history of the past,

I can in neither case be ignorant how much that profession, and its

distinguished members, from an early day of our history, have

contributed to make the country what it is, and the government what it

is.

Gentlemen, the free nature of our institutions, and the popular form of

those governments which have come down to us from the Rock of Plymouth,

give scope to intelligence, to talent, enterprise, and public spirit,

from all classes making up the great body of the community. And the

country has received benefit in all its history and in all its

exigencies, of the most eminent and striking character, from persons of

the class to which my friend before me belongs. Who will ever forget

that the first name signed to our ever-memorable and ever-glorious

Declaration of Independence is the name of John Hancock, a merchant of

Boston? Who will ever forget that, in the most disastrous days of the

Revolution, when the treasury of the country was bankrupt, with unpaid

navies and starving armies, it was a merchant,--Robert Morris of

Philadelphia,--who, by a noble sacrifice of his own fortune, as well as

by the exercise of his great financial abilities, sustained and

supported the wise men of the country in council, and the brave men of

the country in the field of battle? Nor are there wanting more recent

instances. I have the pleasure to see near me, and near my friend who

proposed this sentiment, the son of an eminent merchant of New England

(Mr. Goodhue), an early member of the Senate of the United States,

always consulted, always respected, in whatever belonged to the duty and

the means of putting in operation the financial and commercial system of

the country; and this mention of the father of my friend brings to my

mind the memory of his great colleague, the early associate of Hamilton

and of Ames, trusted and beloved by Washington, consulted on all

occasions connected with the administration of the finances, the

establishment of the treasury department, the imposition of the first

rates of duty, and with every thing that belonged to the commercial

system of the United States,--George Cabot, of Massachusetts.

I will take this occasion to say, Gentlemen, that there is no truth

better developed and established in the history of the United States,

from the formation of the Constitution to the present time, than

this,--that the mercantile classes, the great commercial masses of the

country, whose affairs connect them strongly with every State in the

Union and with all the nations of the earth, whose business and

profession give a sort of nationality to their character,--that no class

of men among us, from the beginning, have shown a stronger and firmer

devotion to whatsoever has been designed, or to whatever has tended, to

preserve the union of these States and the stability of the free

government under which we live. The Constitution of the United States,

in regard to the various municipal regulations and local interests, has

left the States individual, disconnected, isolated. It has left them

their own codes of criminal law; it has left them their own system of

municipal regulations. But there was one great interest, one great

concern, which, from the very nature of the case, was no longer to be

left under the regulations of the then thirteen, afterwards twenty, and

now twenty-six States, but was committed, necessarily committed, to the

care, the protection, and the regulation of one government; and this was

that great unit, as it has been called, the commerce of the United

States. There is no commerce of New York, no commerce of Massachusetts,

none of Georgia, none of Alabama or Louisiana. All and singular, in the

aggregate and in all its parts, is the commerce of the United States,

regulated at home by a uniform system of laws under the authority of the

general government, and protected abroad under the flag of our

government, the glorious _E Pluribus Unum_, and guarded, if need be, by

the power of the general government all over the world. There is,

therefore, Gentlemen, nothing more cementing, nothing that makes us more

cohesive, nothing that more repels all tendencies to separation and

dismemberment, than this great, this common, I may say this overwhelming

interest of one commerce, one general system of trade and navigation,

one everywhere and with every nation of the globe. There is no flag of

any particular American State seen in the Pacific seas, or in the

Baltic, or in the Indian Ocean. Who knows, or who hears, there of your

proud State, or of my proud State? Who knows, or who hears, of any

thing, at the extremest north or south, or at the antipodes,--in the

remotest regions of the Eastern or Western Sea,--who ever hears, or

knows, of any thing but an American ship, or of any American enterprise

of a commercial character that does not bear the impression of the

American Union with it?

It would be a presumption of which I cannot be guilty, Gentlemen, for me

to imagine for a moment, that, among the gifts which New England has

made to our common country, I am any thing more than one of the most

inconsiderable. I readily bring to mind the great men, not only with

whom I have met, but those of the generation before me, who now sleep

with their fathers, distinguished in the Revolution, distinguished in

the formation of the Constitution and in the early administration of the

government, always and everywhere distinguished; and I shrink in just

and conscious humiliation before their established character and

established renown; and all that I venture to say, and all that I

venture to hope may be thought true, in the sentiment proposed, is,

that, so far as mind and purpose, so far as intention and will, are

concerned, I may be found among those who are capable of embracing the

whole country of which they are members in a proper, comprehensive, and

patriotic regard. We all know that the objects which are nearest are the

objects which are dearest; family affections, neighborhood affections,

social relations, these in truth are nearest and dearest to us all; but

whosoever shall be able rightly to adjust the graduation of his

affections, and to love his friends and his neighbors, and his country,

as he ought to love them, merits the commendation pronounced by the

philosophic poet upon him

"Qui didicit patriae quid debeat, et quid amicis."

Gentlemen, it has been my fortune, in the little part which I have acted

in public life, for good or for evil to the community, to be connected

entirely with that government which, within the limits of constitutional

power, exercises jurisdiction over all the States and all the people. My

friend at the end of the table on my left has spoken pleasantly to us

to-night of the reputed miracles of tutelar saints. In a sober sense, in

a sense of deep conviction, I say that the emergence of this country

from British domination, and its union under its present form of

government beneath the general Constitution of the country, if not a

miracle, is, I do not say the most, but one of the most fortunate, the

most admirable, the most auspicious occurrences, which have ever fallen

to the lot of man. Circumstances have wrought out for us a state of

things which, in other times and other regions, philosophy has dreamed

of, and theory has proposed, and speculation has suggested, but which

man has never been able to accomplish. I mean the government of a great

nation over a vastly extended portion of the surface of the earth, _by

means of local institutions for local purposes, and general institutions

for general purposes_. I know of nothing in the history of the world,

notwithstanding the great league of Grecian states, notwithstanding the

success of the Roman system, (and certainly there is no exception to the

remark in modern history,)--I know of nothing so suitable on the whole

for the great interests of a great people spread over a large portion of

the globe, as the provision of local legislation for local and municipal

purposes, with, not a confederacy, nor a loose binding together of

separate parts, but a limited, positive general government for positive

general purposes, over the whole. We may derive eminent proofs of this

truth from the past and the present. What see we to-day in the

agitations on the other side of the Atlantic? I speak of them, of

course, without expressing any opinion on questions of politics in a

foreign country; but I speak of them as an occurrence which shows the

great expediency, the utility, I may say the necessity, of local

legislation. If, in a country on the other side of the water (Ireland),

there be some who desire a severance of one part of the empire from

another, under a proposition of repeal, there are others who propose a

continuance of the existing relation under a federative system: and

what is this? No more, and no less, than an approximation to that system

under which we live, which for local, municipal purposes shall have a

local legislature, and for general purposes a general legislature.

This becomes the more important when we consider that the United States

stretch over so many degrees of latitude,--that they embrace such a

variety of climate,--that various conditions and relations of society

naturally call for different laws and regulations. Let me ask whether

the legislature of New York could wisely pass laws for the government of

Louisiana, or whether the legislature of Louisiana could wisely pass

laws for Pennsylvania or New York? Everybody will say, "No." And yet the

interests of New York and Pennsylvania and Louisiana, in whatever

concerns their relations between themselves and their general relations

with all the states of the world, are found to be perfectly well

provided for, and adjusted with perfect congruity, by committing these

general interests to one common government, the result of popular

general elections among them all.

I confess, Gentlemen, that having been, as I have said, in my humble

career in public life, employed in that portion of the public service

which is connected with the general government, I have contemplated, as

the great object of every proceeding, not only the particular benefit of

the moment, or the exigency of the occasion, but the preservation of

this system; for I do consider it so much the result of circumstances,

and that so much of it is due to fortunate concurrence, as well as to

the sagacity of the great men acting upon those occasions,--that it is

an experiment of such remarkable and renowned success,--that he is a

fool or a madman who would wish to try that experiment a second time. I

see to-day, and we all see, that the descendants of the Puritans who

landed upon the Rock of Plymouth; the followers of Raleigh, who settled

Virginia and North Carolina; he who lives where the truncheon of empire,

so to speak, was borne by Smith; the inhabitants of Georgia; he who

settled under the auspices of France at the mouth of the Mississippi;

the Swede on the Delaware, the Quaker of Pennsylvania,--all find, at

this day, their common interest, their common protection, their common

_glory_, under the united government, which leaves them all,

nevertheless, in the administration of their own municipal and local

affairs, to be Frenchmen, or Swedes, or Quakers, or whatever they

choose. And when one considers that this system of government, I will

not say has produced, because God and nature and circumstances have had

an agency in it,--but when it is considered that this system has not

prevented, but has rather encouraged, the growth of the people of this

country from three millions, on the glorious 4th of July, 1776, to

seventeen millions now, who is there that will say, upon this

hemisphere,--nay, who is there that will stand up in any hemisphere, who

is there in any part of the world, that will say that the great

experiment of a united republic has _failed_ in America? And yet I know,

Gentlemen, I feel, that this united system is held together by strong

tendencies to union, at the same time that it is kept from too much

leaning toward consolidation by a strong tendency in the several States

to support each its own power and consideration. In the physical world

it is said, that

"All nature's difference keeps all nature's peace,"

and there is in the political world this same harmonious difference,

this regular play of the positive and negative powers, (if I may so

say,) which, at least for one glorious half-century, has kept us as we

have been kept, and made us what we are.

But, Gentlemen, I must not allow myself to pursue this topic. It is a

sentiment so commonly repeated by me upon all public occasions, and upon

all private occasions, and everywhere, that I forbear to dwell upon it

now. It is the union of these States, it is the system of government

under which we live, beneath the Constitution of the United States,

happily framed, wisely adopted, successfully administered for fifty

years,--it is mainly this, I say, that gives us power at home and credit

abroad. And, for one, I never stop to consider the power or wealth or

greatness of a State. I tell you, Mr. Chairman, I care nothing for your

Empire State as such. Delaware and Rhode Island are as high in my regard

as New York. In population, in power, in the government over us, you

have a greater share. You would have the same share if you were divided

into forty States. It is not, therefore, as a State sovereignty, it is

only because New York is a vast portion of the whole American people,

that I regard this State, as I always shall regard her, as respectable

and honorable. But among State sovereignties there is no preference;

there is nothing high and nothing low; every State is independent and

every State is equal. If we depart from this great principle, then are

we no longer one people; but we are thrown back again upon the

Confederation, and upon that state of things in which the inequality of

the States produced all the evils which befell us in times past, and a

thousand ill-adjusted and jarring interests.

Mr. President, I wish, then, without pursuing these thoughts, without

especially attempting to produce any fervid impression by dwelling upon

them, to take this occasion to answer my friend who has proposed the

sentiment, and to respond to it by saying, that whoever would serve his

country in this our day, with whatever degree of talent, great or small,

it may have pleased the Almighty Power to give him, he cannot serve it,

he will not serve it, unless he be able, at least, to extend his

political designs, purposes, and objects, till they shall comprehend the

whole country of which he is a servant.

Sir, I must say a word in connection with that event which we have

assembled to commemorate. It has seemed fit to the dwellers in New York,

New-Englanders by birth or descent, to form this society. They have

formed it for the relief of the poor and distressed, and for the purpose

of commemorating annually the great event of the settlement of the

country from which they spring. It would be great presumption in me to

go back to the scene of that settlement, or to attempt to exhibit it in

any colors, after the exhibition made to-day; yet it is an event that in

all time since, and in all time to come, and more in times to come than

in times past, must stand out in great and striking characteristics to

the admiration of the world. The sun's return to his winter solstice, in

1620, is the epoch from which he dates his first acquaintance with the

small people, now one of the happiest, and destined to be one of the

greatest, that his rays fall upon; and his annual visitation, from that

day to this, to our frozen region, has enabled him to see that progress,

_progress_, was the characteristic of that small people. He has seen

them from a handful, that one of his beams coming through a key-hole

might illuminate, spread over a hemisphere which he cannot enlighten

under the slightest eclipse. Nor, though this globe should revolve round

him for tens of hundreds of thousands of years, will he see such another

incipient colonization upon any part of this attendant upon his mighty

orb. What else he may see in those other planets which revolve around

him we cannot tell, at least until we have tried the fifty-foot

telescope which Lord Rosse is preparing for that purpose.

There is not, Gentlemen, and we may as well admit it, in any history of

the past, another epoch from which so many great events have taken a

turn; events which, while important to us, are equally important to the

country from whence we came. The settlement of Plymouth--concurring, I

always wish to be understood, with that of Virginia--was the settlement

of New England by colonies of Old England. Now, Gentlemen, take these

two ideas and run out the thoughts suggested by both. What has been, and

what is to be, Old England? What has been, what is, and what may be, in

the providence of God, _New_ England, with her neighbors and associates?

I would not dwell, Gentlemen, with any particular emphasis upon the

sentiment, which I nevertheless entertain, with respect to the great

diversity in the races of men. I do not know how far in that respect I

might not encroach on those mysteries of Providence which, while I

adore, I may not comprehend; but it does seem to me to be very

remarkable, that we may go back to the time when New England, or those

who founded it, were _subtracted_ from Old England; and both Old England

and New England went on, nevertheless, in their mighty career of

progress and power.

Let me begin with New England for a moment. What has resulted,

embracing, as I say, the nearly contemporaneous settlement of

Virginia,--what has resulted from the planting upon this continent of

two or three slender colonies from the mother country? Gentlemen, the

great epitaph commemorative of the character and the worth, the

discoveries and glory, of Columbus, was, that he had _given a new world

to the crowns of Castile and Aragon_. Gentlemen, this is a great

mistake. It does not come up at all to the great merits of Columbus. He

gave the territory of the southern hemisphere to the crowns of Castile

and Aragon; but as a place for the plantation of colonies, as a place

for the habitation of men, as a place to which laws and religion, and

manners and science, were to be transferred, as a place in which the

creatures of God should multiply and fill the earth, under friendly

skies and with religious hearts, he gave it to the whole world, he gave

it to universal man! From this seminal principle, and from a handful, a

hundred saints, blessed of God and ever honored of men, landed on the

shores of Plymouth and elsewhere along the coast, united, as I have said

already more than once, in the process of time, with the settlement at

Jamestown, has sprung this great people of which we are a portion.

I do not reckon myself among quite the oldest of the land, and yet it so

happens that very recently I recurred to an exulting speech or oration

of my own, in which I spoke of my country as consisting of nine millions

of people. I could hardly persuade myself that within the short time

which had elapsed since that epoch our population had doubled; and that

at the present moment there does exist most unquestionably as great a

probability of its continued progress, in the same ratio, as has ever

existed in any previous time. I do not know whose imagination is fertile

enough, I do not know whose conjectures, I may almost say, are _wild_

enough to tell what may be the progress of wealth and population in the

United States in half a century to come. All we know is, here is a

people of from seventeen to twenty millions, intelligent, educated,

freeholders, freemen, republicans, possessed of all the means of modern

improvement, modern science, arts, literature, with the world before

them! There is nothing to check them till they touch the shores of the

Pacific, and then, they are so much accustomed to water, that _that's_ a

facility, and no obstruction!

So much, Gentlemen, for this branch of the English race; but what has

happened, meanwhile, to England herself since the period of the

departure of the Puritans from the coast of Lincolnshire, from the

English Boston? Gentlemen, in speaking of the progress of English power,

of English dominion and authority, from that period to the present, I

shall be understood, of course, as neither entering into any defence or

any accusation of the policy which has conducted her to her present

state. As to the justice of her wars, the necessity of her conquests,

the propriety of those acts by which she has taken possession of so

great a portion of the globe, it is not the business of the present

occasion to inquire. _Neque teneo, neque refello._ But I speak of them,

or intend to speak of them, as facts of the most extraordinary

character, unequalled in the history of any nation on the globe, and the

consequences of which may and must reach through a thousand generations.

The Puritans left England in the reign of James the First. England

herself had then become somewhat settled and established in the

Protestant faith, and in the quiet enjoyment of property, by the

previous energetic, long, and prosperous reign of Elizabeth. Her

successor was James the Sixth of Scotland, now become James the First

of England; and here was a union of the crowns, but not of the

kingdoms,--a very important distinction. Ireland was held by a military

power, and one cannot but see that at that day, whatever may be true or

untrue in more recent periods of her history, Ireland was held by

England by the two great potencies, the power of the sword and the power

of confiscation. In other respects, England was nothing like the England

which we now behold. Her foreign possessions were quite inconsiderable.

She had some hold on the West India Islands; she had Acadia, or Nova

Scotia, which King James granted, by wholesale, for the endowment of the

knights whom he created by hundreds. And what has been her progress? Did

she then possess Gibraltar, the key to the Mediterranean? Did she

possess a port in the Mediterranean? Was Malta hers? Were the Ionian

Islands hers? Was the southern extremity of Africa, was the Cape of Good

Hope, hers? Were the whole of her vast possessions in India hers? Was

her great Australian empire hers? While that branch of her population

which followed the western star, and under its guidance committed itself

to the duty of settling, fertilizing, and peopling an unknown wilderness

in the West, were pursuing their destinies, other causes, providential

doubtless, were leading English power eastward and southward, in

consequence and by means of her naval prowess, and the extent of her

commerce, until in our day we have seen that within the Mediterranean,

on the western coast and at the southern extremity of Africa, in Arabia,

in hither India and farther India, she has a population _ten times_ as

great as that of the British Isles two centuries ago. And recently, as

we have witnessed,--I will not say with how much truth and justice,

policy or impolicy, I do not speak at all to the morality of the action,

I only speak to the _fact_,--she has found admission into China, and has

carried the Christian religion and the Protestant faith to the doors of

three hundred millions of people.

It has been said that whosoever would see the Eastern world before it

turns into a Western world must make his visit soon, because steamboats

and omnibuses, commerce, and all the arts of Europe, are extending

themselves from Egypt to Suez, from Suez to the Indian seas, and from

the Indian seas all over the explored regions of the still farther East.

Now, Gentlemen. I do not know what practical views or what practical

results may take place from this great expansion of the power of the two

branches of Old England. It is not for me to say. I only can see, that

on this continent _all_ is to be _Anglo-American_ from Plymouth Rock to

the Pacific seas, from the north pole to California. That is certain;

and in the Eastern world, I only see that you can hardly place a finger

on a map of the world and be an _inch_ from an English settlement.

Gentlemen, if there be any thing in the supremacy of races, the

experiment now in progress will develop it. If there be any truth in the

idea, that those who issued from the great Caucasian fountain, and

spread over Europe, are to react on India and on Asia, and to act on the

whole Western world, it may not be for us, nor our children, nor our

grandchildren, to see it, but it will be for our descendants of some

generation to see the extent of that progress and dominion of the

favored races.

For myself, I believe there is no limit fit to be assigned to it by the

human mind, because I find at work everywhere, on both sides of the

Atlantic, under various forms and degrees of restriction on the one

hand, and under various degrees of motive and stimulus on the other

hand, in these branches of a common race, the great principle _of the

freedom of human thought, and the respectability of individual

character_. I find everywhere an elevation of the character of man as

man, an elevation of the individual as a component part of society. I

find everywhere a rebuke of the idea, that the many are made for the

few, or that government is any thing but an _agency_ for mankind. And I

care not beneath what zone, frozen, temperate, or torrid; I care not of

what complexion, white or brown; I care not under what circumstances of

climate or cultivation,--if I can find a race of men on an inhabitable

spot of earth whose general sentiment it is, and whose general feeling

it is, that government is made for man,--man, as a religious, moral, and

social being,--and not man for government, there I know that I shall

find prosperity and happiness.

Gentlemen, I forbear from these remarks. I recur with pleasure to the

sentiment which I expressed at the commencement of my observations. I

repeat the gratification which I feel at having been referred to on this

occasion by a distinguished member of the mercantile profession; and

without detaining you further, I beg to offer as a sentiment,--

"_The mercantile interest of the United States_, always and everywhere

friendly to a united and free government."

Mr. Webster sat down amid loud and repeated applause; and

immediately after, at the request of the President, rose and

said:--#/

Gentlemen, I have the permission of the President to call your attention

to the circumstance that a distinguished foreigner is at the table

to-night, Mr. Aldham; a gentleman, I am happy to say, of my own

hard-working profession, and a member of the English Parliament from the

great city of Leeds. A traveller in the United States, in the most

unostentatious manner, he has done us the honor, at the request of the

Society, to be present to-night. I rise, Gentlemen, to propose his

health. He is of that Old England of which I have been speaking; of that

Old England with whom we had some fifty years ago rather a serious

family quarrel,--terminated in a manner, I believe, not particularly

disadvantageous to either of us. He will find in this, his first visit

to our country, many things to remind him of his own home, and the

pursuits in which he is engaged in that home. If he will go into our

courts of law, he will find those who practise there referring to the

same books of authority, acknowledging the same principles, discussing

the same subjects which he left under discussion in Westminster Hall. If

he go into our public assemblies, he will find the same rules of

procedure--possibly not always quite as regularly observed--as he left

behind him in that house of Parliament of which he is a member. At any

rate, he will find us a branch of that great family to which he himself

belongs, and I doubt not that, in his sojourn among us, in the

acquaintances he may form, the notions he may naturally imbibe, he will

go home to his own country somewhat better satisfied with what he has

seen and learned on this side of the Atlantic, and somewhat more

convinced of the great importance to both countries of preserving the

peace that at present subsists between them. I propose to you,

Gentlemen, the health of Mr. Aldham.

Mr. Aldham rose and said:--"Mr. President and Gentlemen of the New

England Society, I little expected to be called on to take a part

in the proceedings of this evening; but I am very happy in being

afforded an opportunity of expressing my grateful acknowledgments

for the very cordial hospitality which you have extended to me, and

the very agreeable intellectual treat with which I have been

favored this evening. It was with no little astonishment that I

listened to the terms in which I was introduced to you by a

gentleman whom I so much honor (Mr. Webster). The kind and friendly

terms in which he referred to me were, indeed, quite unmerited by

their humble object, and nothing, indeed, could have been more

inappropriate. It is impossible for any stranger to witness such a

scene as this without the greatest interest. It is the celebration

of an event which already stands recorded as one of the most

interesting and momentous occurrences which ever took place in the

annals of our race. And an Englishman especially cannot but

experience the deepest emotion as he regards such a scene. Every

thing which he sees, every emblem employed in this celebration,

many of the topics introduced, remind him most impressively of that

community of ancestry which exists between his own countrymen and

that great race which peoples this continent, and which, in

enterprise, ingenuity, and commercial activity,--in all the

elements indeed of a great and prosperous nation,--is certainly

not exceeded, perhaps not equalled, by any other nation on the face

of the globe. Gentlemen, I again thank you for the honor you have

done me, and conclude by expressing the hope that the event may

continue to be celebrated in the manner which its importance and

interest merit."

Mr. Aldham sat down amid great applause.

The Great Speeches and Orations of Daniel Webster With an Essay on Daniel Webster as a Master of English Style · 第 132 / 210 题