XIX.--OF MEN WHO ARE NOT THEIR OWN MASTERS.

From my own Apartment, June 2.

I have received a letter which accuses me of partiality in the

administration of the censorship; and says, that I have been very

free with the lower part of mankind, but extremely cautious in

representations of matters which concern men of condition. This

correspondent takes upon him also to say, the upholsterer was not undone

by turning politician, but became bankrupt by trusting his goods to

persons of quality; and demands of me, that I should do justice upon

such as brought poverty and distress upon the world below them, while

they themselves were sunk in pleasures and luxury, supported at the

expense of those very persons whom they treated with a negligence, as

if they did not know whether they dealt with them or not. This is a very

heavy accusation, both of me and such as the man aggrieved accuses me

of tolerating. For this reason, I resolved to take this matter into

consideration; and, upon very little meditation, could call to my memory

many instances which made this complaint far from being groundless. The

root of this evil does not always proceed from injustice in the men of

figure, but often from a false grandeur which they take upon them in

being unacquainted with their own business; not considering how mean

a part they act when their names and characters are subjected to the

little arts of their servants and dependants. The overseers of the poor

are a people who have no great reputation for the discharge of their

trust, but are much less scandalous than the overseers of the rich. Ask

a young fellow of a great estate, who was that odd fellow that spoke to

him in a public place? he answers, "one that does my business." It is,

with many, a natural consequence of being a man of fortune, that they

are not to understand the disposal of it; and they long to come to their

estates, only to put themselves under new guardianship. Nay, I have

known a young fellow, who was regularly bred an attorney, and was a

very expert one till he had an estate fallen to him. The moment that

happened, he, who could before prove the next land he cast his eye upon

his own; and was so sharp, that a man at first sight would give him a

small sum for a general receipt, whether he owed him anything or not:

such a one, I say, have I seen, upon coming to an estate, forget all his

diffidence of mankind, and become the most manageable thing breathing.

He immediately wanted a stirring man to take upon him his affairs; to

receive and pay, and do everything which he himself was now too fine a

gentleman to understand. It is pleasant to consider, that he who would

have got an estate, had he not come to one, will certainly starve

because one fell to him; but such contradictions are we to ourselves,

and any change of life is insupportable to some natures.

It is a mistaken sense of superiority to believe a figure, or equipage,

gives men precedence to their neighbours. Nothing can create respect

from mankind, but laying obligations upon them; and it may very

reasonably be concluded, that if it were put into a due balance,

according to the true state of the account, many who believe themselves

in possession of a large share of dignity in the world, must give place

to their inferiors. The greatest of all distinctions in civil life is

that of debtor and creditor; and there needs no great progress in logic

to know which, in that case, is the advantageous side. He who can say

to another, "Pray, master," or "pray, my lord, give me my own," can as

justly tell him, "It is a fantastical distinction you take upon you, to

pretend to pass upon the world for my master or lord, when, at the same

time that I wear your livery, you owe me wages; or, while I wait at your

door, you are ashamed to see me till you have paid my bill."

The good old way among the gentry of England to maintain their

pre-eminence over the lower rank, was by their bounty, munificence,

and hospitality; and it is a very unhappy change, if at present, by

themselves or their agents, the luxury of the gentry is supported by the

credit of the trader. This is what my correspondent pretends to prove

out of his own books, and those of his whole neighbourhood. He has the

confidence to say, that there is a mug-house near Long Acre, where you

may every evening hear an exact account of distresses of this kind. One

complains that such a lady's finery is the occasion that his own wife

and daughter appear so long in the same gown. Another, that all the

furniture of her visiting apartment are no more hers than the scenery of

a play are the proper goods of the actress. Nay, at the lower end of the

same table, you may hear a butcher and a poulterer say, that, at their

proper charge, all that family has been maintained since they last came

to town.

The free manner in which people of fashion are discoursed on at such

meetings is but a just reproach for their failures in this kind; but the

melancholy relations of the great necessities tradesmen are driven to,

who support their credit in spite of the faithless promises which

are made them, and the abatement which they suffer when paid by the

extortion of upper servants, is what would stop the most thoughtless man

in the career of his pleasures, if rightly represented to him.

If this matter be not very speedily amended, I shall think fit to print

exact lists of all persons who are not at their own disposal, though

above the age of twenty-one; and as the trader is made bankrupt for

absence from his abode, so shall the gentleman for being at home, if,

when Mr. Morphew calls, he cannot give him an exact account of what

passes in his own family. After this fair warning, no one ought to think

himself hardly dealt with, if I take upon me to pronounce him no longer

master of his estate, wife, or family, than he continues to improve,

cherish, and maintain them upon the basis of his own property, without

incursions upon his neighbour in any of these particulars.

According to that excellent philosopher Epictetus, we are all but acting

parts in a play; and it is not a distinction in itself to be high or

low, but to become the parts we are to perform. I am, by my office,

prompter on this occasion, and shall give those who are a little out in

their parts such soft hints as may help them to proceed, without letting

it be known to the audience they were out; but if they run quite out

of character, they must be called off the stage, and receive parts more

suitable to their genius. Servile complaisance shall degrade a man from

his honour and quality, and haughtiness be yet more debased. Fortune

shall no longer appropriate distinctions, but nature direct us in the

disposition both of respect and discountenance. As there are tempers

made for command and others for obedience, so there are men born for

acquiring possessions, and others incapable of being other than mere

lodgers in the houses of their ancestors, and have it not in their very

composition to be proprietors of anything. These men are moved only by

the mere effects of impulse: their good-will and disesteem are to be

regarded equally, for neither is the effect of their judgment. This

loose temper is that which makes a man, what Sallust so well remarks

to happen frequently in the same person, to be covetous of what is

another's, and profuse of what is his own. This sort of men is usually

amiable to ordinary eyes; but, in the sight of reason, nothing is

laudable but what is guided by reason. The covetous prodigal is of all

others the worst man in society. If he would but take time to look into

himself, he would find his soul all over gashed with broken vows

and promises; and his retrospect on his actions would not consist of

reflections upon those good resolutions after mature thought, which

are the true life of a reasonable creature, but the nauseous memory of

imperfect pleasures, idle dreams, and occasional amusements. To follow

such dissatisfying pursuits is it possible to suffer the ignominy of

being unjust? I remember in Tully's Epistle, in the recommendation of a

man to an affair which had no manner of relation to money, it is said,

"You may trust him, for he is a frugal man." It is certain, he who has

not a regard to strict justice in the commerce of life, can be capable

of no good action in any other kind; but he who lives below his income,

lays up every moment of life armour against a base world, that will

cover all his frailties while he is so fortified, and exaggerate them

when he is naked and defenceless.

Isaac Bickerstaff, Physician and Astrologer · 第 31 / 41 题