They share this character of indestructibility with all psychic acts

that are really unconscious—that is, with psychic acts belonging to

the system of the unconscious only. These paths are constantly open

and never fall into disuse; they conduct the discharge of the exciting

process as often as it becomes endowed with unconscious excitement. To

speak metaphorically they suffer the same form of annihilation as the

shades of the lower region in the _Odyssey_, who awoke to new life the

moment they drank blood. The processes depending on the foreconscious

system are destructible in a different way. The psychotherapy of the

neuroses is based on this difference.

Footnote FS:

Le Lorrain justly extols the wish-fulfilment of the dream: “Sans

fatigue sérieuse, sans être obligé de recourir à cette lutte opiniâtre

et longue qui use et corrode les jouissances poursuivies.”

Footnote FT:

This idea has been borrowed from _The Theory of Sleep_ by Liébault,

who revived hypnotic investigation in our days. (_Du Sommeil

provoqué_, etc.; Paris, 1889.)

Footnote FU:

The German of the word _bird_ is “Vogel,” which gives origin to the

vulgar expression “vöglen,” denoting sexual intercourse. (Trans.

note.)

Footnote FV:

The italics are my own, though the meaning is plain enough without

them.

Footnote FW:

The italics are mine.

Footnote FX:

_Cf._ the significant observations by J. Breuer in our _Studies on

Hysteria_, 1895, and 2nd ed. 1909.

Footnote FY:

Here, as in other places, there are gaps in the treatment of the

subject, which I have left intentionally, because to fill them up

would require on the one hand too great effort, and on the other hand

an extensive reference to material that is foreign to the dream. Thus

I have avoided stating whether I connect with the word “suppressed”

another sense than with the word “repressed.” It has been made clear

only that the latter emphasizes more than the former the relation to

the unconscious. I have not entered into the cognate problem why the

dream thoughts also experience distortion by the censor when they

abandon the progressive continuation to consciousness and choose the

path of regression. I have been above all anxious to awaken an

interest in the problems to which the further analysis of the

dream-work leads and to indicate the other themes which meet these on

the way. It was not always easy to decide just where the pursuit

should be discontinued. That I have not treated exhaustively the part

played in the dream by the psychosexual life and have avoided the

interpretation of dreams of an obvious sexual content is due to a

special reason which may not come up to the reader’s expectation. To

be sure, it is very far from my ideas and the principles expressed by

me in neuropathology to regard the sexual life as a “pudendum” which

should be left unconsidered by the physician and the scientific

investigator. I also consider ludicrous the moral indignation which

prompted the translator of Artemidoros of Daldis to keep from the

reader’s knowledge the chapter on sexual dreams contained in the

_Symbolism of the Dreams_. As for myself, I have been actuated solely

by the conviction that in the explanation of sexual dreams I should be

bound to entangle myself deeply in the still unexplained problems of

perversion and bisexuality; and for that reason I have reserved this

material for another connection.

Footnote FZ:

The dream is not the only phenomenon tending to base psychopathology

on psychology. In a short series of unfinished articles

(“Monatsschrift für Psychiatrie und Neurologie” entitled _Über den

psychischen Mechanismus der Vergesslichkeit_, 1898, and _Über

Deckerinnerungen_, 1899) I attempt to interpret a number of psychic

manifestations from everyday life in support of the same conception.

These and other articles on “Forgetting,” “Lapse of Speech,” &c., have

since been published collectively under the title of _Psychopathology

of Everyday Life_, 1904 and 1907, of which an English translation will

shortly appear.

Footnote GA:

“The Conception of the Unconscious in Psychology”: Lecture delivered

at the Third International Congress of Psychology at Munich, 1897.

Footnote GB:

_Cf._ here (p. 82) the dream (Σα-τυρος) of Alexander the Great at the

siege of Tyrus.

Footnote GC:

Professor Ernst Oppenheim (Vienna) has shown me from folk-lore

material that there is a class of dreams for which even the people

drop the expectation of future interpretation, and which they trace in

a perfectly correct manner to wish feelings and wants arising during

sleep. He will in the near future fully report upon these dreams,

which for the most part are in the form of “funny stories.”

Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO.

Edinburgh & London.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES

1. Silently corrected typographical errors and variations in spelling.

2. Archaic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings retained as printed.

3. Not all numbered items in the Literary Index have corresponding

crossreferences in the text.

4. Footnotes were re-indexed using letters and collected together at

the end of the last chapter.

5. Enclosed italics font in _underscores_.

The Interpretation of Dreams · 第 50 / 50 段