FOOTNOTES:

[1] At least seventy hills in the state, mainly in this quarter, have

an elevation of 1500 ft. (twenty-four above 2000 ft.).

[2] In some localities it is not easy to establish irrefutably and in

detail the inter-arrangement of drainage and rock structure that

proves it to be a subaerial peneplain instead of an uplifted

submarine platform; but the general proof is very clear.

[3] The yield of cereals and of such other crops in 1907 as are

recorded in the _Yearbook_ of the United States Department of

Agriculture was as follows: Indian corn, 1,584,000 bushels; oats,

245,000 bushels; barley, 64,000 bushels; buckwheat, 42,000 bushels;

potatoes, 3,600,000 bushels; hay, 760,000 tons; tobacco, 7,167,500

lb. In the same year, according to the same authority, there were in

the state 196,000 milch cows, 92,000 other neat cattle, 45,000 sheep

and 70,000 swine.

[4] _The Green Schists and Associated Granites and Porphyries of

Rhode Island_, Bulletin, U.S. Geological Survey, No. 311, 1907.

[5] In 1905 Massachusetts produced 60.7% of the writing paper

manufactured in the country. Besides writing paper, book paper and

building paper are made in the state, but very little newspaper.

[6] It must be noted, however, that the first successful construction

of cards, drawing and roving, and of spindles, on the Arkwright

principle was by S. Slater at Pawtucket, Rhode Island in 1790.

[7] The tax valuation on ships engaged in foreign trade was lowered

between 1884 and 1900 from $2,801,405 to $147,768.

[8] The population of the state was 378,787 in 1790; 422,845 in 1800;

472,040 in 1810; 523,287 in 1820; 610,408 in 1830; 737,699 in 1840;

994,514 in 1850; 1,231,066 in 1860; 1,457,351 in 1870; 1,783,085 in

1880; 2,238,943 in 1890; and 2,805,346 in 1900. In 1905, according to

the state census, the population was 3,003,680, or about 7.7% more

than in 1900.

[9] In 1910 the following townships each had populations of more than

15,000: Revere, Leominster, Westfield, Attleborough, Peabody, Hyde

Park.

[10] The birth-rates every fifth (census) year up to 1895 varied for

natives from 14.48 to 19.49; for foreigners from 45.87 to 66.68. The

marriage rates in quinquennial periods up to 1905 were 19.6, 18.6,

21.0, 19.8, 15.6, 18.6, 18.6, 18.6, 17.4 and 17.4; the ratio of

marriages to the marriageable population was for males (above 16

years) 61.5, for females (above 14) 46.0; the fecundity of marriages

seemed to have increased, being about twice as high for foreigners as

for natives. See _Annual Report_ of the Board of Health (1896), by S.

W. Abbott; and _Sixty-fourth Report of Births, Marriages and Deaths

in Massachusetts_ (1906).

[11] The number of representatives from 1832 to 1908 varied from 240

to 635, and the length of session from 58 to 206 days (since 1867

none of under 100 days), with an almost continual increase in both

respects.

[12] However, every office-holder was, and every subject might be,

required to take (though this was not a condition of the franchise)

the oaths enjoined by parliament in the first year of the reign of

William and Mary as a substitute for the oaths of Allegiance and

Supremacy; and the same still applies to the signing of the

Declaration.

[13] From 1887-1900, out of 290 cases settled, only 107 were formal

arbitrations, 124 agreements were effected by the mediation of the

Board, 100 were effected otherwise while proceedings were pending,

and in 59 cases the Board interposed when the parties preferred

hostilities.

[14] For a summary statement of state labour laws in the United

States in 1903 see _Bulletin 54_ of the United States Bureau of

Labor, September 1904; and for a summary of labour laws in force at

the end of 1907 see 22nd _Annual Report_ (for 1907) of the U.S.

Commissioner of Labor (Washington, 1908).

[15] The usual allotment of the cost of this work is as follows: 65%

is paid by the railway company, 25% by the commonwealth and 10% by

the municipality in which the crossing is located.

[16] The cost was apportioned between the commonwealth and the local

government in the proportion of 3 to 1.

[17] Boston remained a township, governed by town-meetings, until

1822, when it had a population of some 47,000. The government of

Brookline (pop. in 1905, 23,436) is an interesting example of the

adaptation of the township system to urban conditions. The town is

frequently referred to as a model residential suburb; its budgets are

very large, its schools are excellent, and, among other things, it

has established a township gymnasium. The town hall is not large

enough for an assemblage of all the voters, but actually the

attendance is usually limited to about 200, and since 1901 there has

been in force a kind of referendum, under which any measure passed by

a town-meeting attended by 700 or more voters may be referred, upon

petition of 100 legal voters, to a regular vote at the polls. Much of

the work of the town-meetings is done through special committees.

[18] E. G. Brown, in _Monographs on Education in the United States_

prepared for the Paris Exposition of 1900 and edited by N. M. Butler.

[19] This is an especially honourable distinction, for William T.

Harris has said that "The history of education since the time of

Horace Mann is very largely an account of the successive

modifications introduced into elementary schools through the direct

or indirect influence of the normal school."

[20] In 1869 the personalty valuation was 60% that of realty; but it

steadily fell thereafter, amounting in 1893 to 32%. From 1874-1882

the assessment of realty increased nearly twelve times as much as

personalty. In the intervening period the assessed valuation of

realty in Boston increased more than 100%, while that of personalty

slightly diminished (the corresponding figures for the entire United

States from 1860 to 1890 being 172% and 12%), yet the most competent

business and expert opinions regarded the true value of personalty as

at least equal to and most likely twice as great as that of realty.

[21] In this document, whose democracy is characteristic of

differences between the Plymouth Colony and that of Massachusetts

Bay, the signatories "solemnly and mutually ... covenant and combine

ourselves together into a civil body politic, for our better ordering

and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue

hereof to enact, constitute and frame--[laws]--unto which we promise

all due submission and obedience." This was signed 11/21 of November

1620 by 41 persons.

[22] Slavery had existed as a social fact from the earliest years,

and legally after 1641; but it was never profitable, and was

virtually abolished long before the War of American Independence;

still it was never abolished explicitly by Massachusetts, though the

slave trade was prohibited in 1788, and though a number of negroes

were declared free after the adoption of the constitution of 1780 on

the strength of the sweeping declaration of human rights in that

instrument.

[23] According to the final report of the U.S. Adjutant-General in

1885, the enlistments were 146,730 men, of whom 13,942 died in war.

These figures are probably less accurate than those of the state.

[24] Endecott, by commission dated the 30th of April 1629, was made

"governor of London's plantation in the Massachusetts Bay." Matthew

Cradock, first governor of the Company, from the 4th of March 1629 to

the 20th of October 1629, was succeeded on the latter date by John

Winthrop, who, on reaching Salem on the 12th of June 1630 with the

charter, superseded Endecott.

[25] During three periods, 1701-1702, in February 1715, and from

April to August 1757 the affairs of the colony were administered by

the Executive Council.

[26] General Gage was military governor, Hutchinson remaining

nominally civil governor.

MASSACRE, a wholesale indiscriminate killing of persons, and also, in a

transferred sense, of animals. The word is adopted from the French; but

its origin is obscure. The meaning and the old form _macecle_ seem to

point to it being a corruption of the Lat. _macellum_, butcher's shop or

shambles, hence meat market; this is probably from the root _mac_-, seen

in [Greek: machesthai], to fight, [Greek: machaira], sword, and Lat.

_mactare_, to sacrifice. Another derivation connects with the Old Low

Ger. _matsken_, to cut in pieces; cf. mod. Ger. _metzeln_, to massacre.

MASSAGE. The word _massage_ has of late years come into general use to

signify the method of treating disease or other physical conditions by

manipulating the muscles and joints. According to Littré the word is

derived from the Arabic _mass_, and has the specific meaning of

"pressing the muscular parts of the body with the hands, and exercising

traction on the joints in order to give suppleness and stimulate

vitality." It was probably adopted from the Arabian physicians by the

French, who have played a leading part in reviving this method of

treatment, which has been practised from time immemorial, and by the

most primitive people, but has from time to time fallen into disuse

among Western nations. In the _Odyssey_ the women are described as

rubbing and kneading the heroes on their return from battle. In India,

under the name "shampoo" (_tshampua_), the same process has formed part

of the native system of medicine from the most remote times;

professional massers were employed there by Alexander the Great in 327

B.C. In China the method is also of great antiquity, and practised by a

professional class; the Swedish gymnastic system instituted by Pehr

Henrik Ling is derived from the book of Cong-Fou, the bonze of Tao-Sse.

Hippocrates describes and enjoins the use of manipulation, especially in

cases of stiff joints, and he was followed by other Greek physicians.

Oribasius gives an account of the application of friction with the bare

hands, which exactly corresponds with the modern practice of massage. It

is worthy of note that the treatment, after being held in high esteem by

the leading Greek physicians, fell into disrepute with the profession,

apparently on account of its association with vicious abuses. The same

drawback has made itself felt in the present day, and can only be met by

the most scrupulous care in the choice of agents and the manner of their

employment. Among the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, and later the Turks,

massage came to be part of the ordinary procedure of the bath without

any special therapeutic intention, and the usage has survived until

to-day; but that mode of application was no doubt a refinement of

civilized life. Medical rubbing is older and more elementary than

bathing, as we see from its employment by savages. Probably it was

evolved independently among different races from the natural

instinct--shared by the lower animals--which teaches to rub, press or

lick any part of the body in which uneasiness is felt, and is therefore

the oldest of all therapeutic means.

According to Weiss, the therapeutic use of massage was revived in Europe

by Hieronymus Fabricius ab Aquapendente (1537-1619), who applied it to

stiff joints and similar conditions. Paracelsus in his _De medicina

Aegyptiorum_ (1591), gives a description of methodical massage as

practised by the Egyptians quite on modern lines. Thereafter it appears

to have been adopted here and there by individual practitioners, and

various references are made to it, especially by French writers. The

word "massage" occurs in an essay written by Pierre Adolphe Piorry

(1794-1879) for a large encyclopaedia which appeared in 1818, but it was

probably used before. The practice was gradually advocated by an

increasing number of medical men. In Great Britain it was called

"medical rubbing," and at Edinburgh Beveridge had a staff of eight

trained male rubbers. A book published by Estradère in 1863 attracted

much attention, but the man who contributed most to the modern

popularity of massage was Metzger of Amsterdam, who began to use it

tentatively in 1853, and then proceeded to study and apply it

methodically. He published an essay on the subject in 1868. The modern

refinements of the treatment are chiefly due to him. At the same time,

its application by Dr Silas Weir Mitchell to hysterical and other

nervous conditions, in conjunction with the "rest cure," has done much

to make it known.

Massage, as now practised, includes several processes, some of which are

passive and others active. The former are carried out by an operator,

and consist of rubbing and kneading the skin and deeper tissues with the

hands, and exercising the joints by bending the patient's limbs. The

active movements consist of a special form of gymnastics, designed to

exercise particular muscles or groups of muscles. In what is called

"Swedish massage" the operator moves the limbs while the patient

resists, thus bringing the opposing muscles into play. Some writers

insist on confining the word "massage" to the rubbing processes, and use

the general term "manipulation" to cover all the movements mentioned;

but this is a verbal subtlety of no importance. It is evident that alike

among the Greeks, the Orientals, and savage races, the two processes

have always been applied as part of the same treatment, and the

definition quoted above from Littré goes to show that the word "massage"

is properly applied to both.

Rubbing has been subdivided into several processes, namely (1)

stroking, (2) kneading, (3) rubbing, and (4) tapping, and some

practitioners attach great importance to the application of a

particular process in a particular way. As a rule, oils and other

lubricants are not used. But, however it may be applied, the treatment

acts essentially by increasing circulation and improving nutrition. It

has been shown by Lauder Brunton that more blood actually flows

through the tissues during and after rubbing. The number of red

corpuscles, and, to some extent, their haemoglobin value, are also

said to be increased (Mitchell). At the same time the movement of the

lymph stream is accelerated. In order to assist the flow of blood and

lymph, stroking is applied centripetally, that is to say, upwards

along the limbs and the lower part of the body, downwards from the

head. The effects of the increased physiological activity set up are

numerous. Functional ability is restored to exhausted muscles by the

removal of fatigue products and the induction of a fresh blood supply;

congestion is relieved; collections of serous fluid are dispersed;

secretion and excretion are stimulated; local and general nutrition

are improved. These effects indicate the conditions in which massage

may be usefully applied. Such are various forms of paralysis and

muscular wasting, chronic and subacute affections of the joints,

muscular rheumatism, sciatica and other neuralgias, local congestions,

sprains, contractions, insomnia and some forms of headache, in which

downward stroking from the head relieves cerebral congestion. It has

also been used in anaemia, hysteria and "neurasthenia," disorders of

the female organs, melancholia and other forms of insanity,

morphinism, obesity, constipation, inflammatory and other affections

of the eye, including even cataract. General massage is sometimes

applied, as a form of passive exercise, to indolent persons whose

tissues are overloaded with the products of incomplete metabolism.

As with other methods of treatment, there has been a tendency on the

part of some practitioners to exalt it into a cure-all, and of others

to ignore it altogether. Of its therapeutic value, when judiciously

used, there is no doubt, but it is for the physician or surgeon to say

when and how it should be applied. Affections to which it is not

applicable are fevers, pregnancy, collections of pus, acute

inflammation of the joints, inflamed veins, fragile arteries, wounds

of the skin and, generally speaking, those conditions in which it is

not desirable to increase the circulation, or in which the patient

cannot bear handling. In such conditions it may have a very injurious

and even dangerous effect, and therefore should not be used in a

haphazard manner without competent advice.

The revival of massage in Europe and America has called into existence

a considerable number of professional operators, both male and female,

who may be regarded as forming a branch of the nursing profession.

Some of these are trained in hospitals or other institutions, some by

private practitioners and some not at all. Similarly some are attached

to organized societies or institutions while others pursue their

calling independently. Several things are required for a good

operator. One is physical strength. Deep massage is very laborious

work, and cannot be carried on for an hour, or even half an hour,

without unusual muscular power. Feeble persons cannot practise it

effectively at all. The duration of a sitting may vary from five or

ten minutes to an hour. For general massage at least half an hour is

required. A masser should have strength enough to do the work without

too obvious exhaustion, which gives the patient an unpleasant

impression. A second requirement is tactile and muscular sensibility.

A person not endowed with a fine sense of touch and resistance is

liable to exert too great or too little pressure; the one hurts the

patient, the other is ineffective. Then skill and knowledge, which can

only be acquired by a course of instruction, are necessary. Finally,

some guarantee of cleanliness and character is almost indispensable.

Independent massers may possess all these qualifications in a higher

degree than those connected with an institution, but they may also be

totally devoid of them, whereas connexion with a recognized hospital

or society is a guarantee for a certain standard of efficiency. In

London there are several such institutions, which train and send out

both male and female massers. The fee is 5s. an hour, or from two to

four guineas a week. On the European continent, where trained massers

are much employed by some practitioners, the fee is considerably

lower; in the United States it is higher. For reasons mentioned above,

it is most desirable that patients should be attended by operators of

their own sex. If this is not insisted upon, a valuable therapeutic

means will be in danger of falling into disrepute both with the

medical profession and the general public. (A. Sl.)

MASSAGETAE, an ancient warlike people described by Herodotus (i.

203-216; iv. 22, 172) as dwelling beyond the Araxes (i.e. the Oxus) in

what is now Balkh and Bokhara. It was against their queen Tomyris that

Cyrus undertook the expedition in which according to one story he met

his end. In their usages some tribes were nomads like the people of

Scythia (q.v.), others with their community of wives and habit of

killing and eating their parents recalled the Issedones (q.v.); while

the dwellers in the islands of the river were fish-eating savages.

Probably the name denoted no ethnic unity, but included all the

barbarous north-eastern neighbours of the Persians. Herodotus says they

only used gold and copper (or bronze), not silver or iron. Their lavish

use of gold has caused certain massive ornaments from southern Siberia,

now in the Hermitage at St Petersburg, to be referred to the Massagetae.

(E. H. M.)

MASSA MARITTIMA, a town and episcopal see of the province of Grosseto,

Tuscany, Italy, 24 m. N.N.W. of Grosseto direct and 16 m. by rail N.E.

of Follonica (which is 28 m. N.W. of Grosseto on the main coast

railway), 1444 ft. above sea-level. Pop. (1901), (town) 9219; (commune)

17,519. It has a cathedral of the 13th century containing a Romanesque

font (1267 with a cover of 1447) and a Gothic reliquary (1324) of the

saint Cerbone, to whom the cathedral is dedicated. The battlemented

municipal palace of the 13th century is picturesque. There are mineral

springs, mines of iron, mercury, lignite and copper, with foundries,

ironworks and olive-oil mills. At Follonica on the coast, but in this

commune, are the furnaces in which are smelted the iron ore of Elba.

MASSAWA, or MASSOWAH, a fortified town on the African coast of the Red

Sea, chief port of the Italian colony of Eritrea, in 15° 36´ N. and 39°

28´ E. Pop. about 10,000. The town stands at the north end of the bay of

Massawa and is built partly on a coral island of the same name--where

was the original settlement--and partly on the islets of Tautlub and

Sheik Said, and the neighbouring mainland. Massawa Island is from 20 to

25 ft. above the sea, its length does not exceed ½ m. and its breadth is

about ¼ m. The harbour is formed by the channel between the island and

the mainland. It affords good anchorage in from 5 to 9 fathoms. The town

possesses several good public buildings, chiefly built of coral, as are

the houses of the principal European and Arab merchants. Landward the

town is guarded by forts erected by the Italians since 1885. Water was

formerly scarce; but in 1872 an ancient aqueduct from Mokullu (5 m.

distant westward) was restored and continued by an embankment to the

town. A railway connects Massawa with Asmara, the capital of the colony.

Besides the Abyssinians, who speak a Tigré dialect corrupted with

Arabic, the inhabitants comprise Italian officials and traders, Greeks,

Indians, Arabs from Yemen and Hadramut, Gallas and Somalis. Massawa is

the natural port for northern Abyssinia but commerce is undeveloped

owing to the lack of rapid means of communication. The trade done

consists mainly in exporting hides, butter, Abyssinian coffee and civet,

and importing European and Indian cotton goods and silks. It increased

in value from about £65,000 per annum in 1865 (the last year of Turkish

control) to from £240,000 to £280,000 between 1879 and 1881, when under

the administration of Egypt. Under the Italians trade greatly developed.

The returns for the five years 1901-1905 showed an average annual value

of £1,800,000, about two-thirds being imports.

The island of Massawa has probably been inhabited from a very early

date. It appears to have formed part of the Abyssinian dominions for

many centuries. It was at Massawa (Matzua, as it is called by the

Portuguese chroniclers) that Christopher da Gama and his comrades landed

in July 1541 on their way to aid the Abyssinians against the Moslem

invaders. Captured by the Turks in 1557, the island remained a Turkish

possession over two hundred years. A military colony of Bosnians settled

at Arkiko (a port on the bay 4 m. south of Massawa Island) was appointed

not only to defend it in case of attack from the mainland, but to keep

it supplied with water in return for $1400 per month from the town's

customs. For some time at the close of the 18th century Massawa was held

by the sherif of Mecca, and it afterwards passed to Mehemet Ali of

Egypt. The Turks were reinstated about 1850, but in 1865 they handed the

island back to Egypt for an annual tribute of 2½ million piastres. In

February 1885 Massawa was occupied by an Italian force, the Egyptian

garrison stationed there being withdrawn in the November following (see

EGYPT; ITALY; ABYSSINIA). The port was the capital of the Italian colony

until 1900 when the seat of administration was removed to Asmara (see

ERITREA).

For a description of the town in 1769 see the _Travels_ of James

Bruce. At that time the governor, though appointed by the Turks, paid

one half of the customs receipts to the negus of Abyssinia in return

for the protection of that monarch.

MASSÉNA, ANDRÉ, or _Andrea_, duke of Rivoli, prince of Essling

(1756-1817), the greatest of Napoleon's marshals, son of a small wine

merchant, it is said of Jewish origin, was born at Nice on the 6th of

May 1756. His parents were very poor, and he began life as a cabin boy,

but he did not care much for the sea, and in 1775 he enlisted in the

Royal-Italien regiment. He quickly rose to be under-officer-adjutant;

but, finding his birth would prevent his ever getting a commission, he

left the army in 1789, retired to his native city, and married. At the

sound of war, however, and the word republic, his desire to see service

increased, and he once more left Italy, and joined the 3rd battalion of

the volunteers of the Var in 1791. In those days when men elected their

officers, and many of the old commissioned officers had emigrated,

promotion to a man with a knowledge of his drill was rapid, and by

February 1792 Masséna was a lieutenant-colonel. His regiment was one of

those in the army which occupied Nice, and in the advance to the

Apennines which followed, his knowledge of the country, of the language,

and of the people was so useful that in December 1793 he was already a

general of division. In command of the advanced guard he won the battle

of Saorgio in August 1794, capturing ninety guns, and after many

successes he at last, on the 23rd of November 1795, with the right wing

of the army of Italy, had the greatest share in the victory of Loano,

won by Schérer over the Austrians and Sardinians. In Bonaparte's great

campaign of 1796-97 Masséna was his most trusted general of division; in

each battle he won fresh laurels, up to the crowning victory of Rivoli,

from which he afterwards took his title. It was during this campaign

that Bonaparte gave him the title of _enfant gâté de la victoire_, which

he was to justify till he met the English in 1810. In 1798 he commanded

the army of Rome for a short time, but was displaced by the intrigues of

his subordinate Berthier. Masséna's next important service was in

command of the army in Switzerland, which united the army in Germany

under Moreau, and that in Italy under Joubert. There he proved himself a

great captain, as he had already proved himself a great lieutenant; the

archduke Charles and Suvarov had each been successful in Germany and in

Italy, and now turned upon Masséna in Switzerland. That general held his

ground well against the archduke, and then suddenly, leaving Soult to

face the Austrians, he transported his army to Zürich, where, on the

26th of September 1799, he entirely defeated Korsakov, taking 200 guns

and 5000 prisoners. This campaign and battle placed his reputation on a

level with that of his compatriot Bonaparte, and he might have made the

revolution of Brumaire, but he was sincerely attached to the republic,

and had no ambition beyond a desire to live well and to have plenty of

money to spend. Bonaparte, now First Consul, sent him to Genoa to

command the débris of the army of Italy, and he nobly defended Genoa

from February to June to the very last extremity, giving time for

Bonaparte to strike his great blow at Marengo. He now went to Paris,

where he sat in the Corps Législatif in 1803, and actually defended

Moreau without drawing upon himself the ill-will of Napoleon, who well

knew his honesty and lack of ambition.

In 1804 he was made one of the first marshals of France of the new

régime, and in 1805 was decorated with the Grand Eagle of the Legion of

Honour. In that year Napoleon needed an able general to keep in check

the archduke Charles in Italy, while he advanced through Germany with

the grand army. Masséna was chosen; he kept the archduke occupied till

he received news of the surrender of Ulm, and then on the 30th of

October defeated him in the battle of Caldiero. After the peace of

Pressburg had been signed, Masséna was ordered to take possession of the

kingdom of Naples, and to place Joseph Bonaparte on the throne. This

task done, Napoleon summoned Masséna to Poland, where he as usual

distinguished himself, and where he for the time gave up his republican

principles. In 1808 he was made duke of Rivoli. In 1808 he was

accidentally wounded by his old enemy Berthier when both were in

attendance on the emperor at a shooting party, and he lost the sight of

one eye. In the campaign in 1809 he covered himself with glory at

Landshut and at Eckmühl, and finally at the battle of Aspern-Essling his

magnificent leadership made what would without him have been an

appalling disaster into a mere reverse of which the enemy could make no

use. On the field of Wagram Masséna, though too ill to ride, directed

from his carriage the movements of the right wing. For his great

services he was created prince of Essling, and given the princely castle

of Thouars. He was then ordered to Spain to "drive the English into the

sea." (For the campaigns of 1810 and 1811, the advance to and the

retreat from Torres Vedras see PENINSULAR WAR.) Masséna himself, with

some justice, ascribed his failure to the frequent disobedience of his

subordinates Ney, Reynier and Junot, and public opinion attributed this

disobedience to the presence with the army of Masséna's mistress, and to

the resentment thereat felt by the wives of the three generals. Still,

unsuccessful as he was, Masséna displayed the determination of the

defence of Genoa and the fertility in expedients of the campaign of

Zürich, and kept his army for five weary months close up to Wellington's

impregnable position before retiring. His retreat through a devastated

country was terrible, but his force of character kept his men together,

and Ney having shown the worst side of his character now showed the best

in the frequent and brilliant rearguard actions, until a new act of

insubordination at last made the old marshal dismiss Ney from his

command. Soon Masséna was once again ready to try his fortune, and he

nearly defeated Wellington at Fuentes d'Oñoro, though much hampered by

Bessières. But his recall soon followed this and he returned home to

find his prestige gone. The old marshal felt he had a right to complain

of Ney and of Napoleon himself, and, it is said, opened communications

with Fouché and the remnant of the republican party. Whether this be

true or not, Napoleon gave his greatest marshal no more employment in

the field, but made him merely a territorial commandant at Marseilles.

This command he still held at the restoration, when Louis XVIII.

confirmed him in it, and with true Bourbon stupidity gave him letters of

naturalization, as if the great leader of the French armies had not

ceased to be an Italian. When Napoleon returned from Elba, Masséna,

probably by the advice of Fouché, kept Marseilles quiet to await events,

the greatest service he could do the royalists, but afterwards imputed

to him as a fault. After the second restoration Masséna was summoned to

sit on the court-martial which tried Marshal Ney, but, though he had

been on bad terms with that general, and attributed his own disgrace to

him, the old soldier would not be his comrade's judge. This refusal was

used by the royalists to attack the marshal, against whom they raked up

every offence they could think of. This annoyance shortened his life,

and on the 4th of April 1817 the old hero died. He was buried in

Père-la-Chaise, with only the word "Masséna" upon his tombstone.

In private life indolent, greedy, rapacious, ill-educated and morose, in

war Masséna was, like Napoleon, the incarnation of battle. Only his

indolence and his consequent lack of far-ranging imagination prevented

him being as great in strategy as in tactics. His genius needed the

presence of the enemy to stimulate it, but once it sprang to life

Masséna became an ideal leader, absolutely brave, resourceful,

unrelenting and indefatigable. He was as great a master of the strategy

of forces in immediate contact--of gathering up as it were the threads

of the fugue into a "stretto." For the planning of a whole perfect

campaign he had neither knowledge nor inclination, and he falls short

therefore of the highest rank amongst great generals; but his place

amongst the greatest of soldiers is beyond challenge.

See Thiébault's _Éloge funèbre_, and Koch's _Mémoires de Masséna_ (4

vols., 1849), a valuable work, carefully compiled. In more modern

times E. Gachot has produced several important works dealing with

Masséna's campaigns.

MASSENBACH, CHRISTIAN KARL AUGUST LUDWIG VON (1758-1827), Prussian

soldier, was born at Schmalkalden on the 16th of April 1758, and

educated at Heilbronn and Stuttgart, devoting himself chiefly to

mathematics. He became an officer of the Württemberg army in 1778, and

left this for the service of Frederick the Great in 1782. The pay of his

rank was small, and his appointment on the quartermaster-general's staff

made it necessary to keep two horses, so that he had to write

mathematical school-books in his spare time to eke out his resources. He

was far however from neglecting the science and art of war, for thus

early he had begun to make his name as a theorist as well as a

mathematician. After serving as instructor in mathematics to the young

prince Louis, he took part with credit in the expedition into Holland,

and was given the order _Pour le mérite_. On returning to Prussia he

became mathematical instructor at the school of military engineering,

leaving this post in 1792 to take part as a general staff officer in the

war against France. He was awarded a prebend at Minden for his services

as a topographical engineer on the day of Valmy, and after serving

through the campaigns of 1793 and 1794 he published a number of memoirs

on the military history of these years. He was chiefly occupied however

with framing schemes for the reorganization of the then neglected

general staff of the Prussian army, and many of his proposals were

accepted. Bronsart von Schellendorf in his _Duties of the General Staff_

says of Massenbach's work in this connexion, "the organization which he

proposed and in the main carried out survived even the catastrophes of

1806-1807, and exists even at the present moment in its original

outline." This must be accounted as high praise when it is remembered

how much of the responsibility for these very disasters must be laid to

Massenbach's account. The permanent gain to the service due to his

exertions was far more than formal, for it is to him that the general

staff owes its tradition of thorough and patient individual effort. But

the actual doctrine taught by Massenbach, who was now a colonel, may be

summarized as the doctrine of positions carried to a ludicrous excess;

the claims put forward for the general staff, that it was to prepare

cut-and-dried plans of operations in peace which were to be imposed on

the troop leaders in war, were derided by the responsible generals; and

the memoirs on proposed plans of campaign to suit certain political

combinations were worked out in quite unnecessary detail. It was

noteworthy that none of the proposed plans of campaign considered France

as an enemy.

In 1805 came threats of the war with Napoleon which Massenbach had

strongly opposed. He was made quartermaster-general (chief of staff) to

Prince Hohenlohe, over whom he soon obtained a fatal ascendancy. War was

averted for a moment by the result of the battle of Austerlitz, but it

broke out in earnest in October 1806. Massenbach's influence clouded all

the Prussian operations. The battles of Jena and Auerstädt were lost,

and the capitulation of Prince Hohenlohe's army was negotiated. Even

suggestions of disloyalty were not wanting; an attempt to try him by

court-martial was only frustrated by Prince Hohenlohe's action in taking

upon himself, as commander-in-chief, the whole responsibility for

Massenbach's actions. He then retired to his estate in the Posen

province, and occupied himself in writing pamphlets, memoirs, &c. When

his estates passed into the grand duchy of Warsaw, he chose to remain a

Prussian subject, and on the outbreak of the war of liberation he asked

in vain for a post on the Prussian staff. After the fall of Napoleon he

took part in Württemberg politics, was expelled from Stuttgart and

Heidelberg, and soon afterwards arrested at Frankfurt, delivered over to

the Prussian authorities and condemned to fourteen years' fortress

imprisonment for his alleged publication of state secrets in his

memoirs. He was kept in prison till 1826, when Frederick William III.,

having recovered from an accident, pardoned those whom he considered to

have wronged him most deeply. He died on the 21st of November 1827, at

his estate of Bialokoscz, Posen.

The obituary in _Neuer Nekrolog der Deutschen_, pt. ii. (Ilmenau,

1827) is founded on a memoir (_Der Oberst C. v. Massenbach_) which was

published at the beginning of his imprisonment.

MASSENET, JULES ÉMILE FRÉDÉRIC (1842- ), French composer, was born at

Montaud, on the 12th of May 1842. He studied at the Paris Conservatoire,

where he obtained the Grand Prix de Rome in 1863 with the cantata _David

Rizzio_. Massenet became one of the most prolific composers of his time.

His operas include the following: _La Grande tante_, one act, opéra

comique (1867); _Don César de Bazan_, three acts, opéra comique (1872);

_Le Roi de Lahore_, five acts, opera (1877); _Hérodiade_, five acts

(Brussels, 1881); _Manon_, five acts, opéra comique (1884); _Le Cid_,

four acts, opera (1885); _Esclarmonde_, four acts, opéra comique (1889);

_Le Mage_, five acts, opera (1891); _Werther_, four acts (Vienna, 1892);

_Thaïs_, three acts, opera (1894); _Le Portrait de Manon_, one act,

opéra comique (1894); _La Navarraise_, two acts (Covent Garden, 1894);

_Sapho_, opéra comique (1897); _Cendrillon_, opéra comique (1900);

_Grisélidis_, opéra comique (1901); _Le Jongleur de Notre Dame_

(Mentone, 1902). Of these the most popular is Manon. Massenet's other

works include _Marie Madeleine_, sacred drama (1873); _Eve_, a mystery

(1875); _La Vierge_, sacred legend (1880); six orchestral suites

entitled _Scènes hongroises_, _Scènes pittoresques_, _Scènes

dramatiques_, _Scènes napolitaines_, _Scènes de féerie_, _Scènes

alsaciennes_; music to the tragedy _Les Erynnies_, to _Théodora_, _Le

Crocodile_, _L'Hetman_; a requiem, _Narcisse_; an idyll, _Biblis_; a

_Scène antique_; several sets of songs, entitled _Poème d'avril_, _Poème

d'amour_, _Poème d'hiver_, _Poème d'octobre_, _Poème pastoral_, _Poème

du souvenir_; also a large number of detached songs. He was professor of

composition at the Conservatoire from 1878 to 1896, among his pupils

being Hillemacher, Marty, Bruneau, Vidal, Pierné, Leroux and

Charpentier. Massenet undoubtedly possesses a style of his own. He is at

his best in music descriptive of the tender passion, and many of the

love scenes in his operas are very beautiful.

MASSEREENE, JOHN CLOTWORTHY, 1ST VISCOUNT (d. 1665), Anglo-Irish

politician, was a son of Sir Hugh Clotworthy, sheriff of county Antrim.

He was elected to the Irish parliament as member for county Antrim in

1634, and was a member both of the Short and of the Long Parliament in

England. Clotworthy was a vehement opponent of the earl of Stafford, in

whose impeachment he took an active share. He also took part in the

prosecution of Archbishop Laud. Having unsuccessfully negotiated with

Ormond for the surrender of Dublin to the Parliamentary forces in 1646,

he was accused in the following year of having betrayed his cause, and

also of embezzlement; in consequence of these charges he fled to the

Continent, but returned to parliament in June 1648. On the 12th of

December in that year he was arrested, and remained in prison for nearly

three years. Having taken an active part in forwarding the Restoration,

he was employed in Ireland in arranging the affairs of the soldiers and

other adventurers who had settled in Ireland Clotworthy in no way abated

his old animosity against "papists" and high Anglicans, and he

championed the cause of the Irish Presbyterians; but being personally

agreeable to Charles II., his ecclesiastical views were overlooked, and

on the 21st of November 1660 he was created Baron Loughneagh and

Viscount Massereene in the Irish peerage, with remainder in default of

male heirs to his son-in-law, Sir John Skeffington. Massereene died

without male issue in September 1665, and the title devolved on

Skeffington, whose great-grandson, the fifth viscount, was created earl

of Massereene in 1756. The earldom became extinct on the death of the

fourth earl without male issue in 1816, the viscounty and barony of

Loughneagh descending to his daughter Harriet, whose husband, Thomas

Foster, took the name of Skeffington, and inherited from his mother in

1824 the titles of Viscount Ferrard and Baron Oriel of Collon in the

Irish peerage, and from his father in 1828 that of Baron Oriel of

Ferrard in the peerage of the United Kingdom.

MASSEY, SIR EDWARD (c. 1619-c. 1674), English soldier in the Great

Rebellion, was the son of John Massey of Coddington, Cheshire. Little is

known of his early life, but it is said that he served in the Dutch army

against the Spaniards. In 1639 he appears as a captain of pioneers in

the army raised by Charles I. to fight against the Scots. At the

outbreak of the Great Rebellion he was with the king at York, but he

soon joined the Parliamentary army. As lieutenant-colonel under the earl

of Stamford he became deputy governor of Gloucester, where he remained

till towards the end of the first Civil War, becoming governor early in

1643. He conducted minor operations against numerous small bodies of

Royalists, and conducted the defence of Gloucester against the king's

main army in August 1643, with great steadiness and ability, receiving

the thanks of parliament and a grant of £1000 for his services. In 1644

Massey continued to keep the field and to disperse the local Royalists,

and on several occasions he measured swords with Prince Rupert. In May

1644 he was made general of the forces of the Western Association. In

1645 he took the offensive against Lord Goring and the western

Royalists, advanced to the relief of Taunton, and in the autumn

co-operated effectively with Sir Thomas Fairfax and the New Model army

in the Langport campaign. After taking part in the desultory operations

which closed the first war, he took his seat in the House of Commons as

member for Gloucester. He then began to take an active part in politics

on the Presbyterian side, and was one of the generals who was impeached

by the army on the ground that they were attempting to revive the Civil

War in the Presbyterian interests. Massey fled from England in June

1647, and though he resumed his seat in the house in 1648 he was again

excluded by Pride's Purge, and after a short imprisonment escaped to

Holland. Thence, taking the side of the king openly and definitely like

many other Presbyterians, he accompanied Charles II. to Scotland. He

fought against Cromwell at the bridge of Stirling and Inverkeithing, and

commanded the advanced guard of the Royalist army in the invasion of

England in 1651. It was hoped that Massey's influence would win over the

towns of the Severn valley to the cause of the king, and the march of

the army on Worcester was partly inspired by this expectation. However,

he effected little, and after riding with the king for some distance

from the field of Worcester, fell into the hands of his former comrades

and was lodged in the Tower. He again managed to escape to Holland.

While negotiating with the English Presbyterians for the restoration of

Charles, he visited England twice, in 1654 and 1656. In 1660 he was

active in preparing for Charles's return, and was rewarded by a

knighthood and a grant of £3000. The rest of his life was spent in

political, and occasionally in military and administrative business, and

he is said to have died in Ireland in 1674 or 1675.

MASSEY, GERALD (1828-1907), English poet, was born near Tring,

Hertfordshire, on the 29th of May 1828. His parents were in humble

circumstances, and Massey was little more than a child when he was set

to hard work in a silk factory, which he afterwards deserted for the

equally laborious occupation of straw-plaiting. These early years were

rendered gloomy by much distress and deprivation, against which the

young man strove with increasing spirit and virility, educating himself

in his spare time, and gradually cultivating his innate taste for

literary work. He was attracted by the movement known as Christian

Socialism, into which he threw himself with whole-hearted vigour, and so

became associated with Maurice and Kingsley. His first public appearance

as a writer was in connexion with a journal called the _Spirit of

Freedom_, of which he became editor, and he was only twenty-two when he

published his first volume of poems, _Voices of Freedom and Lyrics of

Love_. These he followed in rapid succession by _The Ballad of Babe

Christabel_ (1854), _War Waits_ (1855), _Havelock's March_ (1860), and

_A Tale of Eternity_ (1869). Many years afterwards in 1889, he collected

the best of the contents of these volumes, with additions, into a

two-volume edition of his poems called _My Lyrical Life_. He also

published works dealing with spiritualism, the study of Shakespeare's

sonnets (1872 and 1890), and theological speculation. It is generally

understood that he was the original of George Eliot's _Felix Holt_.

Massey's poetry has a certain rough and vigorous element of sincerity

and strength which easily accounts for its popularity at the time of its

production. He treated the theme of Sir Richard Grenville before

Tennyson thought of using it, with much force and vitality. Indeed,

Tennyson's own praise of Massey's work is still its best eulogy, for the

Laureate found in him "a poet of fine lyrical impulse, and of a rich

half-Oriental imagination." The inspiration of his poetry is essentially

British; he was a patriot to the core. It is, however, as an

Egyptologist that Gerald Massey is best known in the world of letters.

He first published _The Book of the Beginnings_, followed by _The

Natural Genesis_; but by far his most important work is _Ancient Egypt:

The Light of the World_, published shortly before his death. He died on

the 29th of October 1907.

See an article by J. Churton Collins in the _Contemporary Review_ (May

1904).

MASSICUS, MONS, a mountain ridge of ancient Italy, in the territory of the

Aurunci, and on the border of Campania and Latium adjectum--attributed by

most authors to the latter. It projects south-west from the volcanic

system of Rocca Monfina (see SUESSA AURUNCA) as far as the sea, and

separates the lower course of the Liris from the plain of Campania. It

consists of limestone, with a superstratum of pliocenic and volcanic

masses, and was once an island; its highest point is 2661 ft. above

sea-level.

It was very famous for its wine in ancient times. There was just room

along the coast for the road to pass through; the pass was guarded by

the Auruncan town of Vescia (probably on the mountain side), which

ceased to exist in 314 B.C. after the defeat of the Ausones, but left

its name to the spot. Its successor, Sinuessa, on the coast, a station

on the Via Appia, was constructed in 312 B.C., and a colony was

founded there in 295 B.C. It is not infrequently mentioned by

classical writers as a place in which travellers halted. Here Virgil

joined Horace on the famous journey to Brundusium. Domitian

considerably increased its importance by the construction of the Via

Domitiana, which left the Via Appia here and ran to Cumae and Puteoli,

and it was he, no doubt, who raised it to the position of _colonia

Flavia_. The town was destroyed by the Saracens, but some ruins of it

are still visible two miles north-west of the modern village of

Mondragone. The mineral springs which still rise here were frequented

in antiquity.

MASSIF, a French term, adopted in geology and physical geography for a

mountainous mass or group of connected heights, whether isolated or

forming part of a larger mountain system. A "massif" is more or less

clearly marked off by valleys.

MASSILLON, JEAN BAPTISTE (1663-1742), French bishop and preacher, was

born at Hyères on the 24th of June 1663, his father being a royal notary

of that town. At the age of eighteen he joined the Congregation of the

Oratory and taught for a time in the colleges of his order at Pézenas,

and Montbrison and at the Seminary of Vienne. On the death of Henri de

Villars, archbishop of Vienne, in 1693, he was commissioned to deliver a

funeral oration, and this was the beginning of his fame. In obedience to

Cardinal de Noailles, archbishop of Paris, he left the Cistercian abbey

of Sept-Fonds, to which he had retired, and settled in Paris, where he

was placed at the head of the famous seminary of Saint Magloire. He soon

gained a wide reputation as a preacher and was selected to be the Advent

preacher at the court of Versailles in 1699. He was made bishop of

Clermont in 1717, and two years later was elected a member of the French

Academy. The last years of his life were spent in the faithful discharge

of his episcopal duties; his death took place at Clermont on the 18th of

September 1742. Massillon enjoyed in the 18th century a reputation equal

to that of Bossuet and of Bourdaloue, and has been much praised by

Voltaire, D'Alembert and kindred spirits among the _Encyclopaedists_.

His popularity was probably due to the fact that in his sermons he lays

little stress on dogmatic questions, but treats generally of moral

subjects, in which the secrets of the human heart and the processes of

man's reason are described with poetical feeling. He has usually been

contrasted with his predecessor Bourdaloue, the latter having the credit

of vigorous denunciation, Massillon that of gentle persuasiveness.

Besides the _Petit Carême_, a sermon which he delivered before the young

king Louis XV. in 1718, his sermons on the Prodigal Son, on the small

number of the elect, on death, for Christmas Day, and for the Fourth

Sunday in Advent, may be perhaps cited as his masterpieces. His funeral

oration on Louis XIV. is only noted now for the opening sentence: "Dieu

seul est grand." But in truth Massillon is singularly free from

inequality. His great literary power, his reputation for benevolence,

and his known toleration and dislike of doctrinal disputes caused him to

be much more favourably regarded than most churchmen by the

_philosophes_ of the 18th century.

The first edition of Massillon's complete works was published by his

nephew, also an Oratorian (Paris, 1745-1748), and upon this, in the

absence of MSS., succeeding reprints were based. The best modern

edition is that of the Abbé Blampignon (Paris, 1865-1868, 4 vols.; new

ed. 1886).

See Abbé Blampignon, _Massillon, d'après des documents inédits_

(Paris, 1879); and _L'Épiscopat de Massitlon d'après des documents

inédits, suivi de sa correspondance_ (Paris, 1884); F. Brunetière

"L'Éloquence de Massillon" in _Études critiques_ (Paris, 1882); Père

Ingold, _L'Oratoire et le jansénisme au temps de Massitlon_ (Paris,

1880); and Louis Petit de Julleville's _Histoire de la langue et de la

littérature française_, v. 372-385 (Paris, 1898).

MASSILLON, a city of Stark county, Ohio, U.S.A., on the Tuscarawas river

and the Ohio canal, 8 m. W. of Canton, and about 50 m. S. by E. of

Cleveland. Pop. (1900), 11,944 (1693 foreign-born); (1910), 13,879. It

is served by the Pennsylvania (Pittsburg, Ft Wayne & Chicago Division),

the Baltimore & Ohio and the Wheeling & Lake Erie railways. Massillon is

built among hills in a part of the state noted for its large production

of coal and wheat and abounding in white sandstone, iron ore and

potter's clay. The city has various manufactures, including iron,

engines, furnaces, reapers, threshers and bottles. The total value of

the factory products in 1905 was $3,707,013, an increase of 34.8% over

that of 1900. The first settlement was made in 1825; in 1826 the town

was laid out and named in honour of Jean Baptiste Massillon; it was

incorporated a village in 1853, and became a city in 1868.

MASSIMO, or MASSIMI, a Roman princely family of great antiquity, said to

be descended from the ancient Maximi of republican Rome. The name is

first mentioned in 1012 in the person of Leo de Maximis, and the family

played a considerable part in the history of the city in the middle

ages. The brothers Pietro and Francesco Massimi acquired fame by

protecting and encouraging the German printer Ulrich Hahn, who came to

Rome in 1467. In the 16th century the Massimi were the richest of the

Roman nobles. A marquisate was conferred on them in 1544, and the

lordship of Arsoli in 1574. To-day there are two branches of the

Massimi, viz. the Principi Massimo, descended from Camillo Massimiliano

(1770-1840), and the dukes of Rignano, descended from Francesco Massimo

(1773-1844). One of the sons of the present Prince Camillo Carlo

Alberto, Don Fabrizio, married Princess Beatrice, daughter of Don Carlos

of Bourbon (duke of Madrid), the pretender to the Spanish throne. The

Palazzo Massimo in Rome was built by Baldassare Peruzzi by order of

Pietro Massimo, on the ruins of an earlier palace destroyed in the sack

of Rome in 1527.

See F. Gregorovius, _Geschichte der Stadt Rom_ (Stuttgart, 1880); A.

von Reumont, _Geschichte der Stadt Rom_ (Berlin, 1868); _Almanach de

Gotha_; J. H. Douglas, _The Principal Noble Families of Rome_ (Rome,

1905).

MASSINGER, PHILIP (1583-1640), English dramatist, son of Arthur

Massinger or Messanger, was baptized at St Thomas's, Salisbury, on the

24th of November 1583. He apparently belonged to an old Salisbury

family, for the name occurs in the city records as early as 1415. He is

described in his matriculation entry at St Alban Hall, Oxford (1602), as

the son of a gentleman. His father, who had also been educated at St

Alban Hall, was a member of parliament, and was attached to the

household of Henry Herbert, 2nd earl of Pembroke, who recommended him in

1587 for the office of examiner in the court of the marches. The 3rd

earl of Pembroke, the William Herbert whose name has been connected with

Shakespeare's sonnets, succeeded to the title in 1601. It has been

suggested that he supported the poet at Oxford, but the significant

omission of any reference to him in any of Massinger's prefaces points

to the contrary. Massinger left Oxford without a degree in 1606. His

father had died in 1603, and he was perhaps dependent on his own

exertions. The lack of a degree and the want of patronage from Lord

Pembroke may both be explained on the supposition that he had become a

Roman Catholic. On leaving the university he went to London to make his

living as a dramatist, but his name cannot be definitely affixed to any

play until fifteen years later, when _The Virgin Martyr_ (ent. at

Stationers' Hall, Dec. 7, 1621) appeared as the work of Massinger and

Dekker. During these years he worked in collaboration with other

dramatists. A joint letter, from Nathaniel Field, Robert Daborne and

Philip Massinger, to Philip Henslowe, begs for an immediate loan of five

pounds to release them from their "unfortunate extremitie," the money to

be taken from the balance due for the "play of Mr Fletcher's and ours."

A second document shows that Massinger and Daborne owed Henslowe £3 on

the 4th of July 1615. The earlier note probably dates from 1613, and

from this time Massinger apparently worked regularly with John Fletcher,

although in editions of Beaumont and Fletcher's works his co-operation

is usually unrecognized. Sir Aston Cokayne, Massinger's constant friend

and patron, refers in explicit terms to this collaboration in a sonnet

addressed to Humphrey Moseley on the publication of his folio edition of

Beaumont and Fletcher (_Small Poems of Divers Sorts_, 1658), and in an

epitaph on the two poets he says:--

"Plays they did write together, were great friends,

And now one grave includes them in their ends."

After Philip Henslowe's death in 1616 Massinger and Fletcher began to

write for the King's Men. Between 1623 and 1626 Massinger produced

unaided for the Lady Elizabeth's Men then playing at the Cockpit three

pieces, _The Parliament of Love_, _The Bondman_ and _The Renegado_. With

the exception of these plays and _The Great Duke of Florence_, produced

in 1627 by the Queen's servants, Massinger continued to write regularly

for the King's Men until his death. The tone of the dedications of his

later plays affords evidence of his continued poverty. Thus in the

preface to _The Maid of Honour_ (1632) he wrote, addressing Sir Francis

Foljambe and Sir Thomas Bland: "I had not to this time subsisted, but

that I was supported by your frequent courtesies and favours." The

prologue to _The Guardian_ (licensed 1633) refers to two unsuccessful

plays and two years of silence, when the author feared he had lost the

popular favour. S. R. Gardiner, in an essay on "The Political Element in

Massinger" (_Contemp. Review_, Aug. 1876), maintained that Massinger's

dramas are before all else political, that the events of his day were as

openly criticized in his plays as current politics are in the cartoons

of _Punch_. It is probable that this break in his production was owing

to his free handling of public matters. In 1631 Sir Henry Herbert, the

master of the revels, refused to license an unnamed play by Massinger

because of "dangerous matter as the deposing of Sebastian, King of

Portugal," calculated presumably to endanger good relations between

England and Spain. There is little doubt that this was the same piece as

_Believe as You List_, in which time and place are changed, Antiochus

being substituted for Sebastian, and Rome for Spain. In the prologue

Massinger ironically apologizes for his ignorance of history, and

professes that his accuracy is at fault if his picture comes near "a

late and sad example." The obvious "late and sad example" of a wandering

prince could be no other than Charles I.'s brother-in-law, the elector

palatine. An allusion to the same subject may be traced in _The Maid of

Honour_. In another play by Massinger, not extant, Charles I. is

reported to have himself struck out a passage put into the mouth of Don

Pedro, king of Spain, as "too insolent." The poet seems to have adhered

closely to the politics of his patron, Philip Herbert, earl of

Montgomery, and afterwards 4th earl of Pembroke, who had leanings to

democracy and was a personal enemy of the duke of Buckingham. In _The

Bondman_, dealing with the history of Timoleon, Buckingham is satirized

as Gisco. The servility towards the Crown displayed in Beaumont and

Fletcher's plays reflected the temper of the court of James I. The

attitude of Massinger's heroes and heroines towards kings is very

different. Camiola's remarks on the limitations of the royal prerogative

(_Maid of Honour_, act iv. sc. v.) could hardly be acceptable at court.

Massinger died suddenly at his house near the Globe theatre, and was

buried in the churchyard of St Saviour's, Southwark, on the 18th of

March 1640. In the entry in the parish register he is described as a

"stranger," which, however, implies nothing more than that he belonged

to another parish.

The supposition that Massinger was a Roman Catholic rests upon three of

his plays, _The Virgin Martyr_ (licensed 1620), _The Renegado_ (licensed

1624) and _The Maid of Honour_ (c. 1621). The religious sentiment is

certainly such as would obviously best appeal to an audience sympathetic

to Roman Catholic doctrine. _The Virgin Martyr_, in which Dekker

probably had a large share, is really a miracle play, dealing with the

martyrdom of Dorothea in the time of Diocletian, and the supernatural

element is freely used. Little stress can be laid on this performance as

elucidating Massinger's views. It is not entirely his work, and the

story is early Christian, not Roman Catholic. In _The Renegado_,

however, the action is dominated by the beneficent influence of a Jesuit

priest, Francisco, and the doctrine of baptismal regeneration is

enforced. In _The Maid of Honour_ a complicated situation is solved by

the decision of the heroine, Camiola, to take the veil. For this she is

held up "to all posterity a fair example for noble maids to imitate."

Among all Massinger's heroines Camiola is distinguished by genuine

purity and heroism.

His plays have generally an obvious moral intention. He sets himself to

work out a series of ethical problems through a succession of ingenious

and effective plots. In the art of construction he has, indeed, few

rivals. But the virtue of his heroes and heroines is rather morbid than

natural, and often singularly divorced from common-sense. His _dramatis

personae_ are in general types rather than living persons, and their

actions do not appear to spring inevitably from their characters, but

rather from the exigencies of the plot. The heroes are too good, and the

villains too wicked to be quite convincing. Moreover their respective

goodness and villainy are too often represented as extraneous to

themselves. This defect of characterization shows that English drama had

already begun to decline.

It seems doubtful whether Massinger was ever a popular playwright, for

the best qualities of his plays would appeal rather to politicians and

moralists than to the ordinary playgoer. He contributed, however, at

least one great and popular character to the English stage. Sir Giles

Overreach, in _A New Way to Pay Old Debts_, is a sort of commercial

Richard III., a compound of the lion and the fox, and the part provides

many opportunities for a great actor. He made another considerable

contribution to the comedy of manners in _The City Madam_. In

Massinger's own judgment _The Roman Actor_ was "the most perfect birth

of his Minerva." It is a study of the tyrant Domitian, and of the

results of despotic rule on the despot himself and his court. Other

favourable examples of his grave and restrained art are _The Duke of

Milan_, _The Bondman_ and _The Great Duke of Florence_.

Massinger was a student and follower of Shakespeare. The form of his

verse, especially in the number of run-on lines, approximates in some

respects to Shakespeare's later manner. He is rhetorical and

picturesque, but rarely rises to extraordinary felicity. His verse is

never mean, but it sometimes comes perilously near to prose, and in

dealing with passionate situations it lacks fire and directness.

The plays attributed to Massinger alone are: _The Duke of Milan, a

Tragedy_ (c. 1618, pr. 1623 and 1638); _The Unnatural Combat, a

Tragedy_ (c. 1619, pr. 1639); _The Bondman, an Antient Storie_

(licensed 1623, pr. 1624); _The Renegado, a Tragaecomedie_ (lic. 1624,

pr. 1630); _The Parliament of Love_ (lic. 1624; ascribed, no doubt

erroneously, in the Stationers' Register, 1660, to W. Rowley; first

printed by Gifford from an imperfect MS. in 1805); _A New Way to Pay

Old Debts, a Comoedie_ (c. 1625, pr. 1632); _The Roman Actor. A

Tragaedie_ (lic. 1626, pr. 1629); _The Maid of Honour_ (dating perhaps

from 1621, pr. 1632); _The Picture, a Tragecomedie_ (lic. 1629, pr.

1630); _The Great Duke of Florence, a Comicall Historie_ (lic. 1627,

pr. 1635); _The Emperor of the East, a Tragaecomoedie_ (lic. and pr.

1631), founded on the story of Theodosius the Younger; _Believe as You

List_ (rejected by the censor in January, but licensed in May, 1631;

pr. 1848-1849 for the Percy Society); _The City Madam, a Comedie_

(lic. 1632, pr. 1658), which Mr Fleay (_Biog. Chron. of the Eng.

Drama_, i. 226), however, considers to be a _rifaciamento_ of an older

play, probably by Jonson; _The Guardian_ (lic. 1633, pr. 1655); and

_The Bashful Lover_ (lic. 1636, pr. 1655). _A Very Woman, or The

Prince of Tarent_, licensed in 1634 as the work of Massinger alone, is

generally referred to his collaboration with Fletcher. The "exquisite

temperance and justice" of this piece are, according to Swinburne,

foreign to Fletcher's genius, and afford a striking example of

Massinger's artistic skill and moderation.

Twelve plays of Massinger are said to be lost, but the titles of some

of these may be duplicates of those of existing plays. Five of these

lost plays were MSS. used by John Warburton's cook for pie-covers. The

numerous plays in which Massinger's co-operation with John Fletcher is

generally assumed are dealt with under BEAUMONT AND FLETCHER. But it

may be here noted that Mr R. Boyle has constructed an ingenious case

for the joint authorship by Fletcher and Massinger of the two

"Shakespearian" plays, _Henry VIII._ and _Two Noble Kinsmen_ (see the

New Shakspere Society's _Transactions_, 1884 and 1882). Mr Boyle sees

the touch of Massinger in the first two acts of the _Second Maiden's

Tragedy_ (Lansdowne MS., lic. 1611), a play with which the names of

Fletcher and Tourneur are also associated by different critics. _The

Fatall Dowry, a Tragedy_ (c. 1619, pr. 1632), which was adapted

without acknowledgment by Nicholas Rowe in his _Fair Penitent_, was

written in conjunction with Nathaniel Field; and _The Virgin Martir, a

Tragedie_ (lic. 1620, pr. 1621), with Thomas Dekker.

Massinger's independent works were collected by Coxeter (4 vols.,

1759, revised edition with introduction by Thomas Davies, 1779), by J.

Monck Mason (4 vols., 1779), by William Gifford (4 vols., 1805, 1813),

by Hartley Coleridge (1840), by Lieut.-Colonel Cunningham (1867), and

selections by Mr Arthur Symons in the _Mermaid Series_ (1887-1889).

Gifford's remains the standard edition, and formed the basis of

Cunningham's text. It contains "An Essay on the Dramatic Writings of

Massinger" by Dr John Ferriar.

Massinger has been the object of a good deal of criticism. A metrical

examination of the plays in which Massinger was concerned is given in

_Englische Studien_ (Halle, v. 74, vii. 66, viii. 39, ix. 209 and x.

383), by Mr R. Boyle, who also contributed the life of the poet in the

_Dictionary of National Biography_. The sources of his plays are dealt

with by E. Koeppel in _Quellen Studien zu den Dramen Chapman's,

Massinger's und Ford's_ (Strassburg, 1897). For detailed criticism,

beside the introductions to the editions quoted, see A. W. Ward,

_Hist. of Eng. Dram. Lit._ (1899), iii. 1-47, and F. G. Fleay, _Biog.

Chron. of the Eng. Drama_ (1891), under _Fletcher_; a general estimate

of Massinger, dealing especially with his moral standpoint, is given

in Sir Leslie Stephen's _Hours in a Library_ (3rd series, 1879);

Swinburne, in the _Fortnightly Review_ (July 1889), while

acknowledging the justice of Sir L. Stephen's main strictures, found

much to say in praise of the poet.

MASSINISSA (c. 238-149 B.C.), king of Massylian or eastern Numidia. He

was educated, like many of the Numidian chiefs, at Carthage, learnt

Latin and Greek, and was an accomplished as well as a naturally clever

man. Although his kingdom was nominally independent of Carthage, it

really stood to it in a relation of vassalage; it was directly under

Carthaginian influences, and was imbued to a very considerable extent

with Carthaginian civilization. It was to this that Massinissa owed his

fame and success; he was a barbarian at heart, but he had a varnish of

culture, and to this he added the craft and cunning in which

Carthaginian statesmen were supposed to excel. While yet a young man

(212) he forced his neighbour Syphax, prince of western Numidia, who had

recently entered into an alliance with Rome, to fly to the Moors in the

extreme west of Africa. Soon afterwards he appeared in Spain, fighting

for Carthage with a large force of Numidian cavalry against the Romans

under the two Scipios. The defeat of the Carthaginian army in 206 led

him to cast in his lot with Rome. Scipio Africanus is said to have

cultivated his friendship. Massinissa now quitted Spain for a while for

Africa, and was again engaged in a war with Syphax in which he was

decidedly worsted. Scipio's arrival in Africa in 204 gave him another

chance, and no sooner had he joined the Roman general than he crushed

his old enemy Syphax, and captured his capital Cirta (Constantine). Here

occurs the romantic story of Sophonisba, daughter of the Carthaginian

Hasdrubal, who had been promised in marriage to Massinissa, but had

subsequently become the wife of Syphax. Massinissa, according to the

story, married Sophonisba immediately after his victory, but was

required by Scipio to dismiss her as a Carthaginian, and consequently an

enemy to Rome. To save her from such humiliation he sent her poison,

with which she destroyed herself. Massinissa was now accepted as a loyal

ally of Rome, and was confirmed by Scipio in the possession of his

kingdom. In the battle of Zama (202) (see PUNIC WARS), he commanded the

cavalry on Scipio's right wing, and materially assisted the Roman

victory. For his services he received the kingdom of Syphax, and thus

under Roman protection he became master of the whole of Numidia, and his

dominions completely enclosed the Carthaginian territories, now

straitened and reduced at the close of the Second Punic War. It would

seem that he had thoughts of annexing Carthage itself with the

connivance of Rome. In a war which soon followed he was successful; the

remonstrances of Carthage with Rome on the behaviour of her ally were

answered by the appointment of Scipio as arbitrator; but, as though

intentionally on the part of Rome, no definite settlement was arrived

at, and thus the relations between Massinissa and the Carthaginians

continued strained. Rome, it is certain, deliberately favoured her

ally's unjust claims with the view of keeping Carthage weak, and

Massinissa on his part was cunning enough to retain the friendship of

the Roman people by helping them with liberal supplies in their wars

against Perseus of Macedon and Antiochus. As soon as Carthage seemed to

be recovering herself, and some of Massinissa's partisans were driven

from the city into exile, his policy was to excite the fears of Rome,

till at last in 149 war was declared--the Third Punic War, which ended

in the final overthrow of Carthage. The king took some part in the

negotiations which preceded the war, but died soon after its

commencement in the ninetieth year of his age and the sixtieth of his

reign.

Massinissa was an able ruler and a decided benefactor to Numidia. He

converted a plundering tribe into a settled and civilized population,

and out of robbers and marauders made efficient and disciplined

soldiers. To his sons he bequeathed a well-stored treasury, a formidable

army, and even a fleet. Cirta (q.v.), his capital, became a famous

centre of Phoenician civilization. In fact Massinissa changed for the

better the whole aspect of a great part of northern Africa. He had much

of the Arab nature, was singularly temperate, and equal to any amount of

fatigue. His fidelity to Rome was merely that of temporary expediency.

He espoused now one side, and now the other, but on the whole supported

Rome, so that orators and historians could speak of him as "a most

faithful ally of the Roman people."

See Livy xxiv. 49, xxviii. 11, 35, 42, xxix. 27, xxx. 3, 12, 28, 37,

xlii. 23, 29, xliii. 3; Polybius iii. 5, ix. 42, xiv. 1, xxxii. 2,

xxxvii. 3; Appian, _Hisp._ 37, _Punica_, 11, 27, 105; Justin xxxiii.

1; A. H. J. Greenidge, _Hist. of Rome_ (London, 1904).

MASSON, DAVID (1822-1907), Scottish man of letters, was born at Aberdeen

on the 2nd of December 1822, and educated at the grammar school there

and at Marischal College. Intending to enter the Church, he proceeded to

Edinburgh University, where he studied theology under Dr Chalmers, whose

friendship he enjoyed until the divine's death in 1847. However,

abandoning his project of the ministry, he returned to his native city

to undertake the editorship of the _Banner_, a weekly paper devoted to

the advocacy of Free Kirk principles. After two years he resigned this

post and went back to the capital, bent upon pursuing a purely literary

career. There he wrote a great deal, contributing to _Fraser's

Magazine_, _Dublin University Magazine_ (in which appeared his essays on

Chatterton) and other periodicals. In 1847 he went to London, where he

found wider scope for his energy and knowledge. He was secretary

(1851-1852) of the "Society of the Friends of Italy." In a famous

interview with Mrs Browning at Florence he contested her admiration for

Napoleon III. He had known De Quincey, whose biography he contributed in

1878 to the "English Men of Letters" series, and he was an enthusiastic

friend and admirer of Carlyle. In 1852 he was appointed professor of

English literature at University College, London, in succession to A. H.

Clough, and from 1858 to 1865 he edited the newly established

_Macmillan's Magazine_. In 1865 he was selected for the chair of

rhetoric and English literature at Edinburgh, and during the early years

of his professorship actively promoted the movement for the university

education of women. In 1879 he became editor of the Register of the

Scottish Privy Council, and in 1893 was appointed Historiographer Royal

for Scotland. Two years later he resigned his professorship. His _magnum

opus_ in his _Life of Milton in Connexion with the History of His Own

Time_ in six volumes, the first of which appeared in 1858 and the last

in 1880. He also edited the library edition of Milton's _Poetical Works_

(3 vols., 1874), and De Quincey's _Collected Works_ (14 vols.,

1889-1890). Among his other publications are _Essays, Biographical and

Critical_ (1856, reprinted with additions, 3 vols., 1874), _British

Novelists and their Styles_ (1859), _Drummond of Hawthornden_ (1873),

_Chatterton_ (1873) and _Edinburgh Sketches_ (1892). He died on the 6th

of October 1907. A bust of Masson was presented to the senate of the

university of Edinburgh in 1897. Professor Masson had married Rosaline

Orme. His son Orme Masson became professor of chemistry in the

university of Melbourne, and his daughter Rosaline is known as a writer

and novelist.

MASSON, LOUIS CLAUDE FRÉDÉRIC (1847- ), French historian, was born at

Paris on the 8th of March 1847. His father, Francis Masson, a solicitor,

was killed on the 23rd of June 1848, when major in the _garde

nationale_. Young Masson was educated at the college of Sainte Barbe,

and at the lycée Louis-le-Grand, and then travelled in Germany and in

England; from 1869 to 1880 he was librarian at the Foreign Office. At

first he devoted himself to the history of diplomacy, and published

between 1877 and 1884 several volumes connected with that subject. Later

he published a number of more or less curious memoirs illustrating the

history of the Revolution and of the empire. But he is best known for

his books connected with Napoleon. In _Napoléon inconnu_ (1895), Masson,

together with M. Guido Biagi, brought out the unpublished writings

(1786-1793) of the future emperor. These were notes, extracts from

historical, philosophical and literary books, and personal reflections

in which one can watch the growth of the ideas later carried out by the

emperor with modifications necessitated by the force of circumstances

and his own genius. But this was only one in a remarkable series:

_Joséphine de Beauharnais, 1763-1796_ (1898); _Joséphine, impératrice et

reine_ (1899); _Joséphine répudiée 1809-1814_ (1901); _L'Impératrice

Marie Louise_ (1902); _Napoléon et les femmes_ (1894); _Napoléon et sa

famille_ (9 vols., 1897-1907); _Napoléon et son fils_ (1904); and

_Autour de l'Île d'Elbe_ (1908). These works abound in details and

amusing anecdotes, which throw much light on the events and men of the

time, laying stress on the personal, romantic and dramatic aspects of

history. The author was made a member of the Académie française in 1903.

From 1886 to 1889 he edited the review _Arts and Letters_, published in

London and New York.

A bibliography of his works, including anonymous ones and those under

an assumed name, has been published by G. Vicaire (_Manuel de

l'amateur des livres du XIX^e siècle_, tome v., 1904). _Napoléon et

les femmes_ has been translated into English as _Napoleon and the Fair

Sex_ (1894).

MAST (1) (O. Eng. _maest_; a common Teutonic word, cognate with Lat.

_malus_; from the medieval latinized form _mastus_ comes Fr. _mât_), in

nautical language, the name of the spar, or straight piece of timber, or

combination of spars, on which are hung the yards and sails of a vessel

of any size. It has been ingeniously supposed that man himself was the

first mast. He discovered by standing up in his prehistoric "dugout," or

canoe, that the wind blowing on him would carry his craft along. But the

origin of the mast, like that of the ship, is lost in times anterior to

all record. The earliest form of mast which prevailed till the close of

the middle ages, and is still in use for small vessels, was and is a

single spar made of some tough and elastic wood; the conifers supply the

best timber for the purpose. In sketching the history of the development

of the mast, we must distinguish between the increase in the number

erected, and the improvements made in the mast itself. The earliest

ships had only one, carrying a single sail. So little is known of the

rigging of classical ships that nothing can be affirmed of them with

absolute confidence. The Norse vessels carried one mast placed in the

middle. The number gradually increased till it reached four or five. All

were at first upright, but the mast which stood nearest the bow was by

degrees lowered forward till it became the bow-sprit of modern times,

and lost the name of mast. The next from the bows became the

foremast--called in Mediterranean sea language _mizzana_, in French

_misaine_. Then came the main-mast--in French _grand mât_; and then the

mizen--in French, which follows the Mediterranean usage, the _artimon_,

i.e. "next the rudder," _timon_. A small mast was sometimes erected in

the very end of the ship, and called in English a "bonaventure mizen."

It had a close resemblance to the jigger of yawl-rigged yachts. By the

close of the 16th century it had become the established rule that a ship

proper had three masts--fore, main and mizen. The third takes its name

not as the other two do, from its place, but from the lateen sail

originally hoisted on it (see RIGGING), which was placed fore and aft in

the middle (Italian, _mizzo_) of the ship, and did not lie across like

the courses and topsails. With the development of very large sailing

clippers in the middle of the 19th century a return was made to the

practice of carrying more than three masts. Ships and barques are built

with four or five. Some of the large schooners employed in the American

coast trade have six or seven, and some steamers have had as many.

The mast was for long made out of a single spar. Thence the

Mediterranean name of "palo" (spar) and the Spanish "arbol" (tree).

The typical Mediterranean mast of "lateen" (Latin) vessels is short

and bends forward. In other classes it is upright, or bends slightly

backwards with what is called a "rake." The mast is grounded, or in

technical language "stepped," on the kelson (or keelson), the solid

timber or metal beam lying parallel with, and above the keel. As the

15th century advanced the growth of the ship made it difficult, or

even impossible, to find spars large enough to make a mast. The

practice of dividing it into lower, and upper or topmast, was

introduced. At first the two were fastened firmly, and the topmast

could not be lowered. In the 16th century the topmast became movable.

No date can be given for the change, which was gradual, and was not

simultaneously adopted. When the masting of sailing ships was fully

developed, the division was into lower or standing mast, topmast,

topgallant mast, and topgallant royal. The topgallant royal is a small

spar which is often a continuation of the topgallant mast, and is

fixed. Increase of size also made it impossible to construct each of

these subdivisions out of single timbers. A distinction was made

between "whole" or single-spar masts and "armed" and "made masts." The

first were used for the lighter spars, for small vessels and the

Mediterranean craft called "polacras." Armed masts were composed of

two single timbers. Made masts were built of many pieces, bolted and

"coaked," i.e. dovetailed and fitted together, fastened round by iron

hoops, and between them by twelve or thirteen close turns of rope,

firmly secured. "Made masts" are stronger than those made of a single

tree and less liable to be sprung. The general principle of

construction is that it is built round a central shaft, called in

English the "spindle" or "upper tree," and in French the _mèche_ or

wick. The other pieces--"side trees," "keel pieces," "side fishes,"

"cant pieces" and "fillings" are "coaked," i.e. dovetailed and bolted

on to and around the "spindle," which itself is made of two pieces,

coaked and bolted. The whole is bound by iron bands, and between the

bands, by rope firmly "woulded" or turned round, and nailed tight. The

art of constructing made masts, like that of building wooden ships, is

in process of dying out. In sailing men-of-war the mizen-mast often

did not reach to the kelson, but was stepped on the orlop deck. Hollow

metal cylinders are now used as masts. In the case of a masted screw

steamer the masts abaft the engines could not be stepped on the kelson

because they would interfere with the shaft of the screw. It is

therefore necessary to step them on the lower deck, where they are

supported by stanchions, or on a horseshoe covering the screw shaft.

The size of masts naturally varies very much. In a 110-gun ship of

2164 tons the proportions of the mainmast were: for the lower mast,

length 117 ft., diameter 3 ft. 3 in.; topmast, 70 ft., and 20¾ in.;

topgallant mast, 35 ft., and 11(5/8) in., 222 ft. in all. At the other

end of the scale, a cutter of 200 tons had a lower mast of 88 ft., of

22 in. diameter, and a topgallant mast (there was no topmast between

them) of 44 ft., of 9¾ in. in diameter, 132 ft. in all; topgallant

mast of 44 ft., and 9¾ in. in diameter. The masts of a warship were

more lofty than those of a merchant ship of the same tonnage. At

present masts are only used by warships for signalling and military

purposes. In sailing merchant ships, the masts are more lofty than

they were about a century ago. A merchant ship of 1300 tons, in 1830,

had a mainmast 179 ft. in height; a vessel of the same size would have

a mast of 198 ft. to-day.

A "jury mast" is a temporary mast put up by the crew when the spars

nave been carried away in a storm or in action, or have been cut away

to relieve pressure in a storm. The word has been supposed without any

foundation to be short for "injury" mast; it may be a mere fanciful

sailor adaptation of "jury" in some connexion now lost. Skeat suggests

that it is short for O. Fr. _ajourie_, Lat. _adjutare_, to aid. There

is no reason to connect with _jour_, day.

See L. Jal, _Glossaire Nautique_ (Paris, 1848); Sir Henry Manwayring,

_The Seaman's Dictionary_ (London, 1644); N. Hutchinson, _Treatise on

Naval Architecture and Practical Seamanship_ (Liverpool, 1777); David

Steel, _Elements and Practice of Rigging, Seamanship and Naval

Tactics_ (London, 1800); William Burney's _Falconer's Dictionary_

(London, 1830); Sir Gervais Nares's _Seamanship_ (Portsmouth, 1882);

and John Fincham, _On Masting Ships and Mast Making_ (London, 1829).

(D. H.)

MAST (2) (Anglo-Saxon _maest_, food, common to some Teutonic languages,

and ultimately connected with "meat"), the fruit of the beech, oak, and

other forest trees, used as food for swine.

MASTABA (Arab. for "bench"), in Egyptian architecture, the term given to

the rectangular tombs in stone with raking sides and a flat roof. There

were three chambers inside. In one the walls were sometimes richly

decorated with paintings and had a low bench of stone in them on which

incense was burnt. The second chamber was either closed, with holes

pierced in the wall separating it from the first chamber, or entered

through a narrow passage through which the fumes of the incense passed;

this chamber contained the _serdab_ or figure of the deceased. A

vertical well-hole cut in the rock descended to a third chamber in which

the mummy was laid.

MASTER (Lat. _magister_, related to _magis_, more, as the corresponding

_minister_ is to _minus_, less; the English form is due partly to the O.

Eng. _maegister_, and partly to O. Fr. _maistre_, mod. _maître_; cf. Du.

_meester_, Ger. _Meister_, Ital. _maestro_), one holding a position of

authority, disposition or control over persons or things. The various

applications of the word fall roughly into the following main divisions;

as the title of the holder of a position of command or authority; as

that of the holder of certain public or private offices, and hence a

title of address; and as implying the relationship of a teacher to his

pupils or of an employer to the persons he employs. As a title of the

holder of an office, the use of the Lat. _magister_ is very ancient.

_Magister equitum_, master of the horse, goes back to the early history

of the Roman Republic (see DICTATOR; and for the British office, MASTER

OF THE HORSE). In medieval times the title was of great frequency. In Du

Cange (_Glossarium_) the article _magister_ contains over 120

sub-headings. In the British royal household most of the offices bearing

this title are now obsolete. Of the greater offices, that of master of

the buckhounds was abolished by the Civil List Act 1901. The master of

the household, master of the ceremonies, master of the king's music

still survive. Since 1870 the office of master of the mint has been held

by the chancellor of the exchequer, all the administrative and other

duties being exercised by the deputy master.

At sea, a "master" is more properly styled "master mariner." In the

merchant service he is the commander of a ship, and is by courtesy known

as the captain. In the British navy he was the officer entrusted with

the navigation under the captain. He had no royal commission, but a

warrant from the Navy Board. Very often he had been a merchant captain.

His duties are now performed by the staff commander or navigating

lieutenant. The master-at-arms is the head of the internal police of a

ship; the same title is borne by a senior gymnastic instructor in the

army. In the United States navy, the master is a commissioned officer

below the rank of lieutenant.

"Master" appears as the title of many legal functionaries (for the

masters of the supreme court see CHANCERY; and KING'S BENCH, COURT OF;

for masters in lunacy see INSANITY: § _Law_, see also MASTER OF THE

ROLLS, below). The "master of the faculties" is the chief officer of the

archbishop of Canterbury in his court of faculties. His duties are

concerned with the appointment of notaries and the granting of special

licences of marriage. The duties are performed _ex officio_ by the judge

of the provincial courts of Canterbury and York, who is also dean of

Arches, in accordance with § 7 of the Public Worship Regulation Act

1874. The "master of the Temple" is the title of the priest-in-charge of

the Temple Church in London. It was formerly the title of the grand

master of the Knights Templars. The priest-in-charge of the Templars'

Church was properly styled the _custos_, and this was preserved by the

Knights Hospitallers when they were granted the property of the Templars

at the dissolution of that order. The act of 1540 (32 Henry VIII.),

which dissolved the order of the Hospitallers, wrongly styled the

_custos_ master of the Temple, and the mistake has been continued. The

proper title of a bencher of the Inns of Court is "master of the Bench"

(see INNS OF COURT). The title of "Master-General of the Ordnance" was

revived in 1904 for the head of the Ordnance Department in the British

military administration.

"Master" is the ordinary word for a teacher, very generally used in the

compound "schoolmaster." The word also is used in a sense transferred

from this to express the relation between the founder of a school of

religion, philosophy, science, art, &c., and his disciples. It is partly

in this sense and partly in that of one whose work serves as a model or

type of superlative excellence that such terms as "old masters" are

used. In medieval universities _magister_ was particularly applied to

one who had been granted a degree carrying with it the _licentia

docendi_, the licence to teach. In English usage this survives in the

faculty of arts. The degree is that of _artium magister_, master of

arts, abbreviated M.A. In the other faculties the corresponding degree

is doctor. Some British universities give a master's degree in surgery,

_magister chirurgiae_, C.M. or M.Ch., and also in science, _magister

scientiae_, M.Sc. The academic use of "master" as the title of the head

of certain colleges at the universities of Oxford and Cambridge is to be

referred to the frequent application of the term to the holder of a

presiding office in an institution.

Master was the usual prefix of address to a man's name, though

originally confined to people of some social standing. Probably under

the influence of "mistress," it was corrupted in sound to "mister," and

was abbreviated to "Mr." In the case of the puisne judges of the High

Court "Mr Justice" is still used as the proper official form of written

address. The Speaker of the House of Commons is also formally addressed

as "Mr Speaker." In some Scottish peerages below the rank of earl,

"master" is used in the courtesy title of the heir, e.g. the "Master of

Ruthven."

MASTER AND SERVANT. These are scarcely to be considered as technical

terms in English law. The relationship which they imply is created when

one man hires the labour of another for a term. Thus it is not

constituted by merely contracting with another for the performance of a

definite work, or by sending an article to an artificer to be repaired,

or engaging a builder to construct a house. Nor would the employment of

a man for one definite act of personal service--e.g. the engagement of a

messenger for a single occasion--generally make the one master and the

other servant. It was held, however, in relation to the offence of

embezzlement, that a drover employed on one occasion to drive cattle

home from market was a servant within the statute. On the other hand,

there are many decisions limiting the meaning of "servants" under wills

giving legacies to the class of servants generally. Thus "a person who

was not obliged to give his whole time to the master, but was yet in

some sense a servant," was held not entitled to share in a legacy to the

servants. These cases are, however, interpretations of wills where the

intention obviously is to benefit domestic servants only. And so in

other connexions questions may arise as to the exact nature of the

relations between the parties--whether they are master and servant, or

principal and agent, or landlord and tenant, or partners, &c.

The terms of the contract of service are for the most part such as the

parties choose to make them, but in the absence of express stipulations

terms will be implied by the law. Thus, "where no time is limited either

expressly or by implication for the duration of a contract of hiring and

service, the hiring is considered as a general hiring, and in point of

law a hiring for a year." But "in the case of domestic and menial

servants there is a well-known rule, founded solely on custom, that

their contract of service may be determined at any time by giving a

month's warning or paying a month's wages, but a domestic or other

yearly servant, _wrongfully_ quitting his master's service, forfeits all

claim to wages for that part of the current year during which he has

served, and cannot claim the sum to which his wages would have amounted

had he kept his contract, merely deducting therefrom one month's wages.

Domestic servants have a right by custom to leave their situations at

any time on payment of a calendar month's wages in advance, just as a

master may discharge them in a similar manner" (Manley Smith's _Law of

Master and Servant_, chs. ii. and iii.). The following are sufficient

grounds for discharging a servant: (1) wilful disobedience of any lawful

order; (2) gross moral misconduct; (3) habitual negligence; (4)

incompetence or permanent disability caused by illness. A master has a

right of action against any person who deprives him of the services of

his servant, by enticing him away, harbouring or detaining him after

notice, confining or disabling him, or by seducing his female servant.

Indeed, the ordinary and only available action for seduction in English

law is in form of a claim by a parent for the loss of his daughter's

services. The death of either master or servant in general puts an end

to the contract. A servant wrongfully discharged may either treat the

contract as rescinded and sue for services actually rendered, or he may

bring a special action for damages for the breach. The common law

liabilities of a master towards his servants have been further regulated

by the Workmen's Compensation Acts (see EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY). A master

is bound to provide food for a servant living under his roof, and wilful

breach of duty in that respect is a misdemeanour under the Offences

against the Person Act 1861.

A servant has no right to demand "a character" from an employer, and if

a character be given it will be deemed a privileged communication, so

that the master will not be liable thereon to the servant unless it be

false and malicious. A master by knowingly giving a false character of a

servant to an intending employer may render himself liable--should the

servant for example rob or injure his new master.

Reference may be made to the articles on LABOUR LEGISLATION for the

cases in which special terms have been introduced into contracts of

service by statute (e.g. Truck Acts).

MASTER OF THE HORSE, in England, an important official of the

sovereign's household. The master of the horse is the third dignitary of

the court, and is always a member of the ministry (before 1782 the

office was of cabinet rank), a peer and a privy councillor. All matters

connected with the horses and hounds of the sovereign, as well as the

stables and coach-houses, the stud, mews and kennels, are within his

jurisdiction. The practical management of the royal stables and stud

devolves on the chief or crown equerry, formerly called the gentleman of

the horse, who is never in personal attendance on the sovereign and

whose appointment is permanent. The clerk marshal has the supervision of

the accounts of the department before they are submitted to the Board of

Green Cloth, and is in waiting on the sovereign on state occasions only.

Exclusive of the crown equerry there are seven regular equerries,

besides extra and honorary equerries, one of whom is always in

attendance on the sovereign and rides at the side of the royal carriage.

They are always officers of the army, and each of them is "on duty" for

about the same time as the lords and grooms in waiting. There are also

several pages of honour in the master of the horse's department, who

must not be confounded with the pages of various kinds who are in the

department of the lord chamberlain. They are youths aged from twelve to

sixteen, selected by the sovereign in person, to attend on him at state

ceremonies, when two of them, arrayed in an antique costume, assist the

groom of the stole in carrying the royal train.

In France the master of the horse ("Grand Écuyer," or more usually

"Monsieur le grand") was one of the seven great officers of the crown

from 1617. As well as the superintendence of the royal stables, he had

that of the retinue of the sovereign, also the charge of the funds set

aside for the religious functions of the court, coronations, &c. On

the death of a sovereign he had the right to all the horses and their

equipment in the royal stables. Distinct from this officer and

independent of him, was the first equerry ("Premier Écuyer"), who had

charge of the horses which the sovereign used personally ("la petite

écurie"), and who attended on him when he rode out. The office of

master of the horse existed down to the reign of Louis XVI. Under

Louis XVIII. and Charles X. the duties were discharged by the first

equerry, but under Napoléon I. and Napoléon III. the office was

revived with much of its old importance.

In Germany the master of the horse (Oberststallmeister) is a high

court dignitary; but his office is merely titular, the superintendence

of the king's stables being carried out by the Oberstallmeister, an

official corresponding to the crown equerry in England.

MASTER OF THE ROLLS, the third member of the Supreme Court of Judicature

in England, the lord chancellor, president of the chancery division,

being the first, and the lord chief justice, president of the king's

bench division, being the second. At first he was the principal clerk of

the chancery, and as such had charge of the records of the court,

especially of the register of original writs and of all patents and

grants under the Great Seal. Until the end of the 15th century he was

called either the clerk or the keeper of the rolls, and he is still

formally designated as the master or keeper of the rolls. The earliest

mention of him as master of the rolls is in an act of 1495; and in

another act of the same year he is again described as clerk of the

rolls, showing that his official designation still remained unsettled.

About the same period, however, the chief clerks of the chancery came to

be called masters in chancery, and the clerk, master or keeper of the

rolls was always the first among them, whichever name they bore. In

course of time, from causes which are not very easy to trace, his

original functions as keeper of the records passed away from him and he

gradually assumed a jurisdiction in the court of chancery second only to

that of the lord chancellor himself. In the beginning he only heard

causes in conjunction with the other masters in chancery, and his

decrees were invalid until they had been approved and signed by the lord

chancellor. Sitting in the Rolls chapel or in the court in Rolls yard,

he heard causes without assistance, and his decrees held good until they

were reversed on petition either to the lord chancellor or afterwards to

the lords justices of appeal. Before any judge with the formal title of

vice-chancellor was appointed the master of the rolls was often spoken

of as vice-chancellor, and in theory acted as such, sitting only when

the lord chancellor was not sitting and holding his court in the evening

from six o'clock to ten. Only since 1827 has the master of the rolls sat

in the morning hours. By the Public Record Office Act 1838 the custody

of the records was restored to him, and he is chairman of the State

Papers and Historical Manuscripts Commissions. Under the Judicature Act

1875, and the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876, he now always sits with

the lords justices in the court of appeal (which usually sits in two

divisions of three judges, the master of the rolls presiding over one

division), whose decisions can be questioned only in the House of Lords.

The master of the rolls was formerly eligible to a seat in the House of

Commons--a privilege enjoyed by no other member of the judicial

bench;[1] but he was deprived of it by the Supreme Court of Judicature

Act 1873, which provides that all judges of the High Court of Justice

and the court of appeal shall be incapable of being elected to or

sitting in the House of Commons. The master of the rolls is always sworn

of the privy council. His salary is £6000 a year.

See Lord Hardwicke, _Office of the Master of the Rolls_.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Mars" to "Matteawan" Volume 17, Slice 7 · 第 38 / 43 题