ἐν τῇ Λαοδικέων ἐκκλησίᾳ ἀναγνωσθῇ, καὶ τὴν ἐκ Λαοδικίας ἵνα καὶ ὑμεῖς
ἀναγνῶτε. ^{17}Καὶ εἴπατε Ἀρχίππῳ, Βλέπε τὴν διακονίαν ἣν παρέλαβες ἐν
Κυρίῳ, ἵνα αὐτὴν πληροῖς.
τὴν ἐκ Λαοδικίας] i.e. ‘the letter left at Laodicea, which you will
procure thence’. For this abridged expression compare Luke xi. 13 ὁ
πατὴρ _ὁ ἐξ_ οὐρανοῦ δώσει πνεῦμα ἅγιον, xvi. 26 (v. l.) μηδὲ _ὁι
ἐκεῖθεν_ πρὸς ἡμᾶς διαπερῶσιν, Susann. 26 ὡς δὲ ἤκουσαν τὴν κραυγὴν
ἐν τῷ παραδέισῳ _ὁι ἐκ_ τῆς οἰκίας, εἰσεπήδησαν κ.τ.λ. For
instances of this proleptic use of the preposition in classical writers,
where it is extremely common, see Kühner _Gr._ § 448 (II. p. 474), Jelf
_Gr._ § 647, Matthiæ _Gr._ § 596: e.g. Plat. _Apol._ 32 B τοὺς οὐκ
ἀνελομένους τοὺς ἐκ τῆς ναυμαχίας, Xen. _Cyr._ vii. 2. 5 ἁρπασόμενοι τὰ
ἐκ τῶν οἰκιῶν, Isocr. _Paneg._ § 187 τὴν εὐδαιμονίαν τὴν ἐκ τῆς Ἀσίας
εἰς τὴν )Ευρώπην διακομίσαιμεν. There are good reasons for the belief
that St Paul here alludes to the so-called Epistle to the Ephesians,
which was in fact a circular letter addressed to the principal churches
of proconsular Asia (see above p. 37, and the introduction to the
Epistle to the Ephesians). Tychicus was obliged to pass through Laodicea
on his way to Colossæ, and would leave a copy there, before the
Colossian letter was delivered. For other opinions respecting this
‘letter from Laodicea’ see the detached note.
ἵνα καὶ ὑμεῖς κ.τ.λ.] ‘see _that ye also read_’. At first sight it might
seem as though this ἵνα also were governed by ποίησατε, like the former;
but, inasmuch as ποίησατε would be somewhat awkward in this connexion,
it is perhaps better to treat the second clause as independent and
elliptical, (βλέπετἐ ἵνα κ.τ.λ. This is suggested also by the position
of τὴν ἐκ Λαοδικίας before ἵνα; comp. Gal. ii. 10 μόνον τῶν πτωχῶν ἵνα
μνημονεύωμεν (with the note). Ellipses before ἵνα are frequent; e.g.
John ix. 3, 2 Cor. viii. 13, 2 Thess. iii. 9, 1 Joh. ii. 19.
17. Κὰι )έιπατε] Why does not the Apostle address himself directly to
Archippus? It might be answered that he probably thought the warning
would come with greater emphasis, when delivered by the voice of the
Church. Or the simpler explanation perhaps is, that Archippus was not
resident at Colossæ but at Laodicea: see the introduction to the Epistle
to Philemon. On this warning itself see above, p. 42.
Βλέπε] ‘_look to_’, as 2 Joh. 8 βλέπετε ἑαυτοὺς ἵνα μὴ κ.τ.λ. More
commonly it has the accusative of the thing to be avoided; see Phil.
iii. 2 (with the note).
τὴν διακονίαν] From the stress which is laid upon it, the διακονία here
would seem to refer, as in the case of Timothy cited below, to some
higher function than the diaconate properly so called. In Acts xii. 25
the same phrase, πληροῦν τὴν διακονίαν, is used of a temporary
ministration, the collection and conveyance of the alms for the poor of
Jerusalem (Acts xi. 29); but the solemnity of the warning here points to
a continuous office, rather than an immediate service.
παρέλαβες] i.e. probably παρ’ ἐμοῦ. The word suggests, though it does
not necessarily imply, a mediate rather than a direct reception: see the
note Gal. i. 12. Archippus received the charge immediately from St Paul,
though ultimately from Christ. ‘Non enim sequitur’, writes Bengel, ‘_a
Domino_ (1 Cor. xi. 23), sed _in Domino_’.
πληροῖς] ‘_fulfil_’, i.e. ‘_discharge fully_’; comp. 2 Tim. iv. 5 τὴν
διακονίαν σου πληροφόρησον.
------------------------------------------------------------------------