CHAPTER III--THE CLOSE OF THE THEBAN EMPIRE

_Ramses III.--The Theban city under the Ramessides--Manners and

customs._

As in a former crisis, Egypt once more owed her salvation to a scion

of the old Theban race. A descendant of Seti I. or Ramses II., named

Nakhtûsît, rallied round him the forces of the southern nomes, and

succeeded, though not without difficulty, in dispossessing the Syrian

Arisû. “When he arose, he was like Sûtkhû, providing for all the

necessities of the country which, for feebleness, could not stand,

killing the rebels which were in the Delta, purifying the great throne

of Egypt; he was regent of the two lands in the place of Tûmû, setting

himself to reorganise that which had been overthrown, to such good

purpose, that each one recognised as brethren those who had been

separated from him as by a wall for so long a time, strengthening

the temples by pious gifts, so that the traditional rites could be

celebrated at the divine cycles.” *

* The exact relationship between Nakhtûsît and Ramses II. is

not known; he was probably the grandson or great-grandson of

that sovereign, though Ed. Meyer thinks he was perhaps the

son of Seti II. The name should be read either Nakhîtsît,

with the singular of the first word composing it, or

Nakhîtûsît, Nakhtûsît, with the plural, as in the analogous

name of the king of the XXXth dynasty, Nectanebo.

Many were the difficulties that he had to encounter before he could

restore to his country that peace and wealth which she had enjoyed under

the long reign of Sesostris. It seems probable that his advancing years

made him feel unequal to the task, or that he desired to guard against

the possibility of disturbances in the event of his sudden death; at

all events, he associated with himself on the throne his eldest son

Ramses--not, however, as a Pharaoh who had full rights to the crown,

like the coadjutors of the Amenemhâîts and Usirtasens, but as a prince

invested with extraordinary powers, after the example of the sons of the

Pharaohs Thûtmosis and Seti I. Ramses recalls with pride, towards the

close of his life, how his father “had promoted him to the dignity of

heir-presumptive to the throne of Sibû,” and how he had been acclaimed

as “the supreme head of Qimît for the administration of the whole earth

united together.” * This constituted the rise of a new dynasty on the

ruins of the old--the last, however, which was able to retain the

supremacy of Egypt over the Oriental world. We are unable to ascertain

how long this double reign lasted.

* The only certain monument that we as yet possess of this

double reign is a large stele cut on the rock behind

Medinet-Habû.

[Illustration: 289.jpg NAKHTÛSÎT.]

Nakhtûsît, fully occupied by enemies within the country, had no leisure

either to build or to restore any monuments;* on his death, as no tomb

had been prepared for him, his mummy was buried in that of the usurper

Siphtah and the Queen Tausirît.

* Wiedemann attributes to him the construction of one of the

doors of the temple of Mût at Karnak; it would appear that

there is a confusion in his notes between the prenomen of

this sovereign and that of Seti II., who actually did

decorate one of the doorways of that temple. Nakhûsît must

have also worked on the temple of Phtah at Memphis. His

cartouche is met with on a statue originally dedicated by a

Pharaoh of the XIIth dynasty, discovered at Tell-Nebêsheh.

He was soon forgotten, and but few traces of his services survived him;

his name was subsequently removed from the official list of the kings,

while others not so deserving as he--as, for instance, Siphtah-Minephtah

and Amenmesis--were honourably inscribed in it. The memory of his son

overshadowed his own, and the series of the legitimate kings who formed

the XXth dynasty did not include him. Ramses III. took for his hero his

namesake, Ramses the Great, and endeavoured to rival him in everything.

This spirit of imitation was at times the means of leading him to commit

somewhat puerile acts, as, for example, when he copied certain

triumphal inscriptions word for word, merely changing the dates and

the cartouches,* or when he assumed the prenomen of Usirmârî, and

distributed among his male children the names and dignities of the sons

of Sesostris. We see, moreover, at his court another high priest of

Phtah at Memphis bearing the name of Khâmoîsît, and Marîtûmû, another

supreme pontiff of Râ in Heliopolis. However, this ambition to resemble

his ancestor at once instigated him to noble deeds, and gave him the

necessary determination to accomplish them.

* Thus the great decree of Phtah-Totûnen, carved by Ramses

II. in the year XXXV. on the rocks of Abu Simbel, was copied

by Ramses III. at Medinet-Habû in the year XII.

He began by restoring order in the administration of affairs; “he

established truth, crushed error, purified the temple from all crime,”

and made his authority felt not only in the length and breadth of the

Nile valley, but in what was still left of the Asiatic provinces.

The disturbances of the preceding years had weakened the prestige of

Amon-Râ, and the king’s supremacy would have been seriously endangered,

had any one arisen in Syria of sufficient energy to take advantage of

the existing state of affairs. But since the death of Khâtusaru, the

power of the Khâti had considerably declined, and they retained their

position merely through their former prestige; they were in as much need

of peace, or even more so, than the Egyptians, for the same discords

which had harassed the reigns of Seti II. and his successors had

doubtless brought trouble to their own sovereigns. They had made no

serious efforts to extend their dominion over any of those countries

which had been the objects of the cupidity of their forefathers, while

the peoples of Kharu and Phoenicia, thrown back on their own resources,

had not ventured to take up arms against the Pharaoh. The yoke lay

lightly upon them, and in no way hampered their internal liberty; they

governed as they liked, they exchanged one prince or chief for another,

they waged petty wars as of old, without, as a rule, exposing themselves

to interference from the Egyptian troops occupying the country, or from

the “royal messengers.” These vassal provinces had probably ceased to

pay tribute, or had done so irregularly, during the years of anarchy

following the death of Siphtah, but they had taken no concerted action,

nor attempted any revolt, so that when Ramses III. ascended the throne

he was spared the trouble of reconquering them. He had merely to claim

allegiance to have it at once rendered him--an allegiance which included

the populations in the neighbourhood of Qodshû and on the banks of the

Nahr el-Kelb. The empire, which had threatened to fall to pieces amid

the civil wars, and which would indeed have succumbed had they continued

a few years longer, again revived now that an energetic prince had been

found to resume the direction of affairs, and to weld together those

elements which had been on the point of disintegration.

One state alone appeared to regret the revival of the Imperial power;

this was the kingdom of Libya. It had continued to increase in size

since the days of Mînephtah, and its population had been swelled by the

annexation of several strange tribes inhabiting the vast area of the

Sahara. One of these, the Mashaûasha, acquired the ascendency among

these desert races owing to their numbers and valour, and together with

the other tribes--the Sabati, the Kaiakasha, the Shaîû, the Hasa, the

Bikana, and the Qahaka*--formed a confederacy, which now threatened

Egypt on the west. This federation was conducted by Didi, Mashaknû,

and Mâraîû, all children of that Mâraîû who had led the first Libyan

invasion, and also by Zamarû and Zaûtmarû, two princes of less important

tribes.** Their combined forces had attacked Egypt for the second time

during the years of anarchy, and had gained possession one after another

of all the towns in the west of the Delta, from the neighbourhood of

Memphis to the town of Qarbîna: the Canopic branch of the Nile now

formed the limit of their dominion, and they often crossed it to

devastate the central provinces.***

* This enumeration is furnished by the summary of the

campaigns of Ramses III. in _The Great Harris Papyrus_. The

Sabati of this text are probably identical with the people

of the Sapudiu or Spudi (Asbytse), mentioned on one of the

pylons of Medinet-Habû.

** The relationship is nowhere stated, but it is thought to

be probable from the names of Didi and Mâraîû, repeated in

both series of inscriptions.

*** The town of Qarbîna has been identified with the Canopus

of the Greeks, and also with the modern Korbani; and the

district of Gautu, which adjoined it, with the territory of

the modern town of Edkô. Spiegel-berg throws doubt on the

identification of Qarbu or Qarbîna, with Canopus. Révillout

prefers to connect Qarbîna with Heracleopolis Parva in Lower

Egypt.

Nakhtûsîti had been unable to drive them out, and Ramses had not

ventured on the task immediately after his accession. The military

institutions of the country had become totally disorganised after the

death of Mînephtah, and that part of the community responsible for

furnishing the army with recruits had been so weakened by the late

troubles, that they were in a worse condition than before the first

Libyan invasion. The losses they had suffered since Egypt began its

foreign conquests had not been repaired by the introduction of fresh

elements, and the hope of spoil was now insufficient to induce members

of the upper classes to enter the army. There was no difficulty in

filling the ranks from the fellahîn, but the middle class and the

aristocracy, accustomed to ease and wealth, no longer came forward in

large numbers, and disdained the military profession. It was the fashion

in the schools to contrast the calling of a scribe with that of a

foot-soldier or a charioteer, and to make as merry over the discomforts

of a military occupation as it had formerly been the fashion to extol

its glory and profitableness. These scholastic exercises represented the

future officer dragged as a child to the barracks, “the side-lock over

his ear.--He is beaten and his sides are covered with scars,--he is

beaten and his two eyebrows are marked with wounds,--he is beaten and

his head is broken by a badly aimed blow; he is stretched on the ground”

for the slightest fault, “and blows fall on him as on a papyrus,--and

he is broken by the stick.” His education finished, he is sent away to

a distance, to Syria or Ethiopia, and fresh troubles overtake him. “His

victuals and his supply of water are about his neck like the burden of

an ass,--and his neck and throat suffer like those of an ass,--so that

the joints of his spine are broken.--He drinks putrid water, keeping

perpetual guard the while.” His fatigues soon tell upon his health

and vigour: “Should he reach the enemy,--he is like a bird which

trembles.--Should he return to Egypt,--he is like a piece of old

worm-eaten wood.--He is sick and must lie down, he is carried on an

ass,--while thieves steal his linen,--and his slaves escape.” The

charioteer is not spared either. He, doubtless, has a moment of

vain-glory and of flattered vanity when he receives, according to

regulations, a new chariot and two horses, with which he drives at a

gallop before his parents and his fellow-villagers; but once having

joined his regiment, he is perhaps worse off than the foot-soldier.

“He is thrown to the ground among thorns:--a scorpion wounds him in

the foot, and his heel is pierced by its sting.--When his kit is

examined,--his misery is at its height.” No sooner has the fact been

notified that his arms are in a bad condition, or that some article has

disappeared, than “he is stretched on the ground--and overpowered with

blows from a stick.” This decline of the warlike spirit in all classes

of society had entailed serious modifications in the organisation of

both army and navy. The native element no longer predominated in most

battalions and on the majority of vessels, as it had done under the

XVIIIth dynasty; it still furnished those formidable companies of

archers--the terror of both Africans and Asiatics--and also the most

important part, if not the whole, of the chariotry, but the main body

of the infantry was composed almost exclusively of mercenaries,

particularly of the Shardana and the Qahaka. Ramses began his reforms

by rebuilding the fleet, which, in a country like Egypt, was always

an artificial creation, liable to fall into decay, unless a strong

and persistent effort were made to keep it in an efficient condition.

Shipbuilding had made considerable progress in the last few centuries,

perhaps from the impulse received through Phoenicia, and the vessels

turned out of the dockyards were far superior to those constructed under

Hâtshopsîtû. The general outlines of the hull remained the same, but

the stem and stern were finer, and not so high out of the water; the

bow ended, moreover, in a lion’s head of metal, which rose above

the cut-water. A wooden structure running between the forecastle and

quarter-deck protected the rowers during the fight, their heads alone

being exposed. The mast had only one curved yard, to which the sail was

fastened; this was run up from the deck by halyards when the sailors

wanted to make sail, and thus differed from the Egyptian arrangement,

where the sail was fastened to a fixed upper yard. At least half of the

crews consisted of Libyan prisoners, who were branded with a hot iron

like cattle, to prevent desertion; the remaining half was drawn from

the Syrian or Asiatic coast, or else were natives of Egypt. In order

to bring the army into better condition, Ramses revived the system of

classes, which empowered him to compel all Egyptians of unmixed race to

take personal service, while he hired mercenaries from Libya, Phoenicia,

Asia Minor, and wherever he could get them, and divided them into

regular regiments, according to their extraction and the arms that they

bore. In the field, the archers always headed the column, to meet the

advance of the foe with their arrows; they were followed by the Egyptian

lancers--the Shardana and the Tyrseni with their short spears and heavy

bronze swords--while a corps of veterans, armed with heavy maces,

brought up the rear.* In an engagement, these various troops formed

three lines of infantry disposed one behind the other--the light brigade

in front to engage the adversary, the swordsmen and lancers who were to

come into close quarters with the foe, and the mace-bearers in reserve,

ready to advance on any threatened point, or to await the critical

moment when their intervention would decide the victory: as in the times

of Thûtmosis and Ramses II. the chariotry covered the two wings.

* This is the order of march represented during the Syrian

campaign, as gathered from the arrangement observed in the

pictures at Medinet-Habu.

It was well for Ramses that on ascending the throne he had devoted

himself to the task of recruiting the Egyptian army, and of personally

and carefully superintending the instruction and equipment of his men;

for it was thanks to these precautions that, when the confederated

Libyans attacked the country about the Vth year of his reign, he was

enabled to repulse them with complete success. “Didi, Mashaknû, Maraîû,

together with Zamarû and Zaûtmarû, had strongly urged them to

attack Egypt and to carry fire before them from one end of it to the

other.”--“Their warriors confided to each other in their counsels,

and their hearts were full: ‘We will be drunk!’ and their princes said

within their breasts: ‘We will fill our hearts with violence!’ But their

plans were overthrown, thwarted, broken against the heart of the god,

and the prayer of their chief, which their lips repeated, was

not granted by the god.” They met the Egyptians at a place called

“Kamsisû-Khasfi-Timihû” (“Ramses repulses the Timihû”), but their attack

was broken by the latter, who were ably led and displayed considerable

valour. “They bleated like goats surprised by a bull who stamps its

foot, who pushes forward its horn and shakes the mountains, charging

whoever seeks to annoy it.” They fled afar, howling with fear, and

many of them, in endeavouring to escape their pursuers, perished in the

canals. “It is,” said they, “the breaking of our spines which threatens

us in the land of Egypt, and its lord destroys our souls for ever and

ever. Woe be upon them! for they have seen their dances changed into

carnage, Sokhît is behind them, fear weighs upon them. We march no

longer upon roads where we can walk, but we run across fields, all the

fields! And their soldiers did not even need to measure arms with us in

the struggle! Pharaoh alone was our destruction, a fire against us every

time that he willed it, and no sooner did we approach than the flame

curled round us, and no water could quench it on us.” The victory was a

brilliant one; the victors counted 12,535 of the enemy killed,* and

many more who surrendered at discretion. The latter were formed into

a brigade, and were distributed throughout the valley of the Nile in

military settlements. They submitted to their fate with that resignation

which we know to have been a characteristic of the vanquished at that

date.

* The number of the dead is calculated from that of the

hands and phalli brought in by the soldiers after the

victory, the heaps of which are represented at Medinet-Habu.

They regarded their defeat as a judgment from God against which there

was no appeal; when their fate had been once pronounced, nothing

remained to the condemned except to submit to it humbly, and to

accommodate themselves to the master to whom they were now bound by a

decree from on high. The prisoners of one day became on the next the

devoted soldiers of the prince against whom they had formerly fought

resolutely, and they were employed against their own tribes, their

employers having no fear of their deserting to the other side during

the engagement. They were lodged in the barracks at Thebes, or in the

provinces under the feudal lords and governors of the Pharaoh, and

were encouraged to retain their savage customs and warlike spirit. They

intermarried either with the fellahîn or with women of their own tribes,

and were reinforced at intervals by fresh prisoners or volunteers.

Drafted principally into the Delta and the cities of Middle Egypt, they

thus ended by constituting a semi-foreign population, destined by nature

and training to the calling of arms, and forming a sort of warrior

caste, differing widely from the militia of former times, and known for

many generations by their national name of Mashaûasha. As early as the

XIIth dynasty, the Pharaohs had, in a similar way, imported the Mazaîû

from Nubia, and had used them as a military police; Ramses III. now

resolved to naturalise the Libyans for much the same purpose. His

victory did not bear the immediate fruits that we might have expected

from his own account of it; the memory of the exploits of Ramses II.

haunted him, and, stimulated by the example of his ancestor at Qodshû,

he doubtless desired to have the sole credit of the victory over the

Libyans. He certainly did overcome their kings, and arrested their

invasion; we may go so far as to allow that he wrested from them the

provinces which they had occupied on the left bank of the Canopic

branch, from Marea to the Natron Lakes, but he did not conquer them,

and their power still remained as formidable as ever. He had gained a

respite at the point of the sword, but he had not delivered Egypt from

their future attacks.

[Illustration: 299.jpg one of the Libyan chiefs VANQUISHED BY RAMSES

III.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Champollion.

He might perhaps have been tempted to follow up his success and assume

the offensive, had not affairs in Asia at this juncture demanded the

whole of his attention. The movement of great masses of European tribes

in a southerly and easterly direction was beginning to be felt by the

inhabitants of the Balkans, who were forced to set out in a double

stream of emigration--one crossing the Bosphorus and the Propontis

towards the centre of Asia Minor, while the other made for what was

later known as Greece Proper, by way of the passes over Olympus and

Pindus. The nations who had hitherto inhabited these regions, now found

themselves thrust forward by the pressure of invading hordes, and were

constrained to move towards the south and east by every avenue which

presented itself. It was probably the irruption of the Phrygians into

the high table-land which gave rise to the general exodus of these

various nations--the Pulasati, the Zakkala, the Shagalasha, the Danauna,

and the Uashasha--some of whom had already made their way into Syria and

taken part in campaigns there, while others had as yet never measured

strength with the Egyptians. The main body of these migrating tribes

chose the overland route, keeping within easy distance of the coast,

from Pamphylia as far as the confines of Naharaim.

[Illustration: 300.jpg THE WAGGONS OF THE PULASATI AND THEIR

CONFEDERATES]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Champollion.

They were accompanied by their families, who must have been mercilessly

jolted in the ox-drawn square waggons with solid wheels in which they

travelled. The body of the vehicle was built either of roughly squared

planks, or else of something resembling wicker-work. The round axletree

was kept in its place by means of a rude pin, and four oxen were

harnessed abreast to the whole structure. The children wore no clothes,

and had, for the most part, their hair tied into a tuft on the top of

their heads; the women affected a closely fitting cap, and were wrapped

in large blue or red garments drawn close to the body.* The men’s attire

varied according to the tribe to which they belonged. The Pulasati

undoubtedly held the chief place; they were both soldiers and sailors,

and we must recognise in them the foremost of those tribes known to the

Greeks of classical times as the Oarians, who infested the coasts of

Asia Minor as well as those of Greece and the Ægean islands.**

* These details are taken from the battle-scenes at Medinet-

Habu.

** The Pulasati have been connected with the Philistines by

Champollion, and subsequently by the early English

Egyptologists, who thought they recognised in them the

inhabitants of the Shephelah. Chabas was the first to

identify them with the Pelasgi; Unger and Brugsch prefer to

attribute to them a Libyan origin, but the latter finally

returns to the Pelasgic and Philistine hypothesis. They were

without doubt the Philistines, but in their migratory state,

before they settled on the coast of Palestine.

[Illustration: 301.jpg PULASATI]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

Crete was at this time the seat of a maritime empire, whose chiefs were

perpetually cruising the seas and harassing the civilized states of

the Eastern Mediterranean. These sea-rovers had grown wealthy through

piracy, and contact with the merchants of Syria and Egypt had awakened

in them a taste for a certain luxury and refinement, of which we find

no traces in the remains of their civilization anterior to this period.

Some of the symbols in the inscriptions found on their monuments recall

certain of the Egyptian characters, while others present an original

aspect and seem to be of Ægean origin. We find in them, arranged in

juxtaposition, signs representing flowers, birds, fish, quadrupeds

of various kinds, members of the human body, and boats and household

implements. From the little which is known of this script we are

inclined to derive it from a similar source to that which has furnished

those we meet with in several parts of Asia Minor and Northern Syria.

It would appear that in ancient times, somewhere in the centre of the

Peninsula--but under what influence or during what period we know not--a

syllabary was developed, of which varieties were handed on from tribe

to tribe, spreading on the one side to the Hittites, Cilicians, and

the peoples on the borders of Syria and Egypt, and on the other to the

Trojans, to the people of the Cyclades, and into Crete and Greece. It

is easy to distinguish the Pulasati by the felt helmet which they wore

fastened under the chin by two straps and surmounted by a crest of

feathers. The upper part of their bodies was covered by bands of leather

or some thick material, below which hung a simple loin-cloth, while

their feet were bare or shod with short sandals. They carried each a

round buckler with two handles, and the stout bronze sword common to

the northern races, suspended by a cross belt passing over the left

shoulder, and were further armed with two daggers and two javelins.

They hurled the latter from a short distance while attacking, and then

drawing their sword or daggers, fell upon the enemy; we find among them

a few chariots of the Hittite type, each manned by a driver and two

fighting men. The Tyrseni appear to have been the most numerous after

the Pulasati, next to whom came the Zakkala. The latter are thought to

have been a branch of the Siculo-Pelasgi whom Greek tradition represents

as scattered at this period among the Cyclades and along the coast of

the Hellespont;* they wore a casque surmounted with plumes like that

of the Pulasati. The Tyrseni may be distinguished by their feathered

head-dress, but the Shaga-lasha affected a long ample woollen cap

falling on the neck behind, an article of apparel which is still worn by

the sailors of the Archipelago; otherwise they were equipped in much the

same manner as their allies. The other members of the confederation,

the Shardana, the Danauna, and the Nashasha, each furnished an

inconsiderable contingent, and, taken all together, formed but a small

item of the united force.**

* The Zakkara, or Zakkala, have been identified with the

Teucrians by Lauth, Chabas, and Fr. Lenormant, with the

Zygritse of Libya by linger and Brugsch, who subsequently

returned to the Teucrian hypothesis; W. Max Millier regards

them as an Asiatic nation probably of the Lydian family. The

identification with the Siculo-Pelasgi of the Ægean Sea was

proposed by Maspero.

** The form of the word shows that it is of Asiatic origin,

Uasasos, Uassos, which refers us to Caria or Lycia.

Their fleet sailed along the coast and kept within sight of the force on

land. The squadrons depicted on the monuments are without doubt those of

the two peoples, the Pulasati and Zakkala. Their ships resembled in many

respects those of Egypt, except in the fact that they had no cut-water.

The bow and stern rose up straight like the neck of a goose or swan; two

structures for fighting purposes were erected above the dock, while a

rail running round the sides of the vessel protected the bodies of the

rowers. An upper yard curved in shape hung from the single mast, which

terminated in a top for the look-out during a battle. The upper yard was

not made to lower, and the top-men managed the sail in the same manner

as the Egyptian sailors. The resemblance between this fleet and that

of Ramses is easily explained. The dwellers on the Ægean, owing to

the knowledge they had acquired of the Phoenician galleys, which

were accustomed to cruise annually in their waters, became experts in

shipbuilding.

[Illustration: 304.jpg A SIHAGALASHA CHIEF]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Petrie.

They copied the lines of the Phoenician craft, imitated the rigging, and

learned to manoeuvre their vessels so well, both on ordinary occasions

and in a battle, that they could now oppose to the skilled eastern

navigators ships as well fitted out and commanded by captains as

experienced as those of Egypt or Asia.

There had been a general movement among all these peoples at the very

time when Ramses was repelling the attack of the Libyans; “the isles had

quivered, and had vomited forth their people at once.” *

* This campaign is mentioned in the inscription of Medinet-

Habu. We find some information about the war in the _Great

Harris Papyrus_, also in the inscription of Medinet-Habu

which describes the campaign of the year V., and in other

shorter texts of the same temple.

They were subjected to one of those irresistible impulses such as had

driven the Shepherds into Egypt; or again, in later times, had carried

away the Cimmerians and the Scyths to the pillage of Asia Minor: “no

country could hold out against their arms, neither Khâti, nor Qodi, nor

Carchemish, nor Arvad, nor Alasia, without being brought to nothing.”

The ancient kingdoms of Sapalulu and Khâtusaru, already tottering,

crumbled to pieces under the shock, and were broken up into their

primitive elements. The barbarians, unable to carry the towns by

assault, and too impatient to resort to a lengthened siege, spread

over the valley of the Orontes, burning and devastating the country

everywhere. Having reached the frontiers of the empire, in the country

of the Amorites, they came to a halt, and constructing an entrenched

camp, installed within it their women and the booty they had acquired.

Some of their predatory bands, having ravaged the Bekâa, ended by

attacking the subjects of the Pharaoh himself, and their chiefs dreamed

of an invasion of Egypt. Ramses, informed of their design by the

despatches of his officers and vassals, resolved to prevent its

accomplishment. He summoned his troops together, both indigenous

and mercenary, in his own person looked after their armament and

commissariat, and in the VIIIth year of his reign crossed the frontier

near Zalu. He advanced by forced marches to meet the enemy, whom

he encountered somewhere in Southern Syria, on the borders of the

Shephelah,* and after a stubbornly contested campaign obtained the

victory. He carried off from the field, in addition to the treasures of

the confederate tribes, some of the chariots which had been used for the

transport of their families. The survivors made their way hastily to the

north-west, in the direction of the sea, in order to receive the support

of their navy, but the king followed them step by step.

* No site is given for these battles. E. de Rougé placed the

theatre of war in Syria, and his opinion was accepted by

Brugsch. Chabas referred it to the mouth of the Nile near

Pelusium, and his authority has prevailed up to the present.

The remarks of W. Max Müller have brought me back to the

opinion of the earlier Egyptologists; but I differ from him

in looking for the locality further south, and not to the

mouth of Nahr el-Kelb as the site of the naval battle. It

seems to me that the fact that the Zakkala were prisoners at

Dor, and the Pulasati in the Shephelah, is enough to assign

the campaign to the regions I have mentioned in the text.

It is recorded that he occupied himself with lion-hunting _en route_

after the example of the victors of the XVIIIth dynasty, and that he

killed three of these animals in the long grass on one occasion on the

banks of some river. He rejoined his ships, probably at Jaffa, and made

straight for the enemy. The latter were encamped on the level shore, at

the head of a bay wide enough to offer to their ships a commodious

space for naval evolutions--possibly the mouth of the Belos, in the

neighbourhood of Magadîl. The king drove their foot-soldiers into the

water at the same moment that his admirals attacked the combined fleet

of the Pulasati and Zakkala.

[Illustration: 307.jpg THE ARMY OP RAMSES III. ON THE MARCH, AND THE

LION-HUNT]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

Some of the Ægean galleys were capsized and sank when the Egyptian

vessels rammed them with their sharp stems, and the crews, in

endeavouring to escape to land by swimming, were picked off by the

arrows of the archers of the guard who were commanded by Ramses and his

sons; they perished in the waves, or only escaped through the compassion

of the victors. “I had fortified,” said the Pharaoh, “my frontier at

Zahi; I had drawn up before these people my generals, my provincial

governors, the vassal princes, and the best of my soldiers. The mouths

of the river seemed to be a mighty rampart of galleys, barques, and

vessels of all kinds, equipped from the bow to the stern with valiant

armed men. The infantry, the flower of Egypt, were as lions roaring

on the mountains; the charioteers, selected from among the most rapid

warriors, had for their captains only officers confident in themselves;

the horses quivered in all their limbs, and were burning to trample the

nations underfoot. As for me, I was like the warlike Montû: I stood up

before them and they saw the vigour of my arms. I, King Ramses, I was as

a hero who is conscious of his valour, and who stretches his hands over

the people in the day of battle. Those who have violated my frontier

will never more garner harvests from this earth: the period of their

soul has been fixed for ever. My forces were drawn up before them on

the ‘Very Green,’ a devouring flame approached them at the river mouth,

annihilation embraced them on every side. Those who were on the strand

I laid low on the seashore, slaughtered like victims of the butcher.

I made their vessels to capsize, and their riches fell into the sea.”

Those who had not fallen in the fight were caught, as it were, in

the cast of a net. A rapid cruiser of the fleet carried the Egyptian

standard along the coast as far as the regions of the Orontes and

Saros. The land troops, on the other hand, following on the heels of the

defeated enemy, pushed through Coele-Syria, and in their first burst of

zeal succeeded in reaching the plains of the Euphrates. A century had

elapsed since a Pharaoh had planted his standard in this region, and the

country must have seemed as novel to the soldiers of Ramses III. as to

those of his predecessor Thûtmosis.

[Illustration: 308.jpg THE DEFEAT OF THE PEOPLES OF THE SEA]

The Khâti were still its masters; and all enfeebled as they were by

the ravages of the invading barbarians, were nevertheless not slow in

preparing to resist their ancient enemies. The majority of the citadels

shut their gates in the face of Ramses, who, wishing to lose no time,

did not attempt to besiege them: he treated their territory with the

usual severity, devastating their open towns, destroying their harvests,

breaking down their fruit trees, and cutting away their forests. He was

able, moreover, without arresting his march, to carry by assault several

of their fortified towns, Alaza among the number, the destruction of

which is represented in the scenes of his victories. The spoils were

considerable, and came very opportunely to reward the soldiers or to

provide funds for the erection of monuments. The last battalion of

troops, however, had hardly recrossed the isthmus when Lotanû became

again its own master, and Egyptian rule was once more limited to its

traditional provinces of Kharû and Phoenicia. The King of the Khâti

appears among the prisoners whom the Pharaoh is represented as bringing

to his father Amon; Carchemish, Tunipa, Khalabu, Katna, Pabukhu, Arvad,

Mitanni, Mannus, Asi, and a score of other famous towns of this period

appear in the list of the subjugated nations, recalling the triumphs

of Thûtmosis III. and Amenothes II. Ramses did not allow himself to

be deceived into thinking that his success was final. He accepted the

protestations of obedience which were spontaneously offered him, but he

undertook no further expedition of importance either to restrain or to

provoke his enemies: the restricted rule which satisfied his exemplar

Ramses II. ought, he thought, to be sufficient for his own ambition.

Egypt breathed freely once more on the announcement of the victory;

henceforward she was “as a bed without anguish.” “Let each woman now go

to and fro according to her will,” cried the sovereign, in describing

the campaign, “her ornaments upon her, and directing her steps to any

place she likes!” And in order to provide still further guarantees of

public security, he converted his Asiatic captives, as he previously

had his African prisoners, into a bulwark against the barbarians, and

a safeguard of the frontier. The war must, doubtless, have decimated

Southern Syria; and he planted along its coast what remained of the

defeated tribes--the Philistines in the Shephelah, and the Zakkala on

the borders of the great oak forest stretching from Oarmel to Dor.*

* It is in this region that we find henceforward the Hebrews

in contact with the Philistines: at the end of the XXIst

Egyptian dynasty a scribe makes Dor a town of the Zakkala.

Watch-towers were erected for the supervision of this region, and for

rallying-points in case of internal revolts or attacks from without. One

of these, the Migdol of Ramses III., was erected, not far from the scene

of the decisive battle, on the spot where the spoils had been divided.

This living barrier, so to speak, stood between the Nile valley and the

dangers which threatened it from Asia, and it was not long before

its value was put to the proof. The Libyans, who had been saved from

destruction by the diversion created in their favour on the eastern side

of the empire, having now recovered their courage, set about collecting

their hordes together for a fresh invasion. They returned to the attack

in the XIth year of Ramses, under the leadership of Kapur, a prince of

the Mashauasha.*

* The second campaign against the Libyans is known to us

from the inscriptions of the year XI. at Medinet-Habu.

[Illustration: 313.jpg THE CAPTIVE CHIEFS OF RAMSES III. AT

MEDINET-IHABU]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Beato. The first

prisoner on the left is the Prince of the Khâti (cf. the cut

on p. 318 of the present work), the second is the Prince of

the Amâuru [Amoritos], the third the Prince of the Zakkala,

the fourth that of the Shardana, the fifth that of the

Shakalasha (see the cut on p. 304 of this work), and the

sixth that of the Tursha [Tyrseni].

Their soul had said to them for the second time that “they would end

their lives in the nomes of Egypt, that they would till its valleys and

its plains as their own land.” The issue did not correspond with their

intentions. “Death fell upon them within Egypt, for they had hastened

with their feet to the furnace which consumes corruption, under the

fire of the valour of the king who rages like Baal from the heights of

heaven. All his limbs are invested with victorious strength; with his

right hand he lays hold of the multitudes, his left extends to those who

are against him, like a cloud of arrows directed upon them to destroy

them, and his sword cuts like that of Montû. Kapur, who had come to

demand homage, blind with fear, threw down his arms, and his troops did

the same. He sent up to heaven a suppliant cry, and his son [Mashashalu]

arrested his foot and his hand; for, behold, there rises beside him the

god who knows what he has in his heart: His Majesty falls upon their

heads as a mountain of granite and crushes them, the earth drinks up

their blood as if it had been water...; their army was slaughtered,

slaughtered their soldiers,” near a fortress situated on the borders

of the desert called the “Castle of Usirmarî-Miamon.” They were seized,

“they were stricken, their arms bound, like geese piled up in the bottom

of a boat, under the feet of His Majesty.” * The fugitives were pursued

at the sword’s point from the _Castle of Usirmarî-Miamon_ to the _Castle

of the Sands_, a distance of over thirty miles.**

* The name of the son of Kapur, Mashashalu, Masesyla, which

is wanting in this inscription, is supplied from a parallel

inscription.

* The Castle of Usirmarî-Miamon was “on the mountain of the

horn of the world,” which induces me to believe that we must

seek its site on the borders of the Libyan desert. The royal

title entering into its name being liable to change with

every reign, it is possible that we have an earlier

reference to this stronghold in a mutilated passage of the

Athribis Stele, which relates to the campaigns of Mînephtah;

it must have commanded one of the most frequented routes

leading to the oasis of Amon.

[Illustration: 314.jpg RAMSES III. BINDS THE CHIEFS OF THE LIBYANS]

From a photograph by Beato.

Two thousand and seventy-five Libyans were left upon the ground that

day, two thousand and fifty-two perished in other engagements, while

two thousand and thirty-two, both male and female, were made prisoners.

These were almost irreparable losses for a people of necessarily small

numbers, and if we add the number of those who had succumbed in the

disaster of six years before, we can readily realise how discouraged

the invaders must have been, and how little likely they were to try the

fortune of war once more. Their power dwindled and vanished almost as

quickly as it had arisen; the provisional cohesion given to their forces

by a few ambitious chiefs broke up after their repeated defeats, and

the rudiments of an empire which had struck terror into the Pharaohs,

resolved itself into its primitive elements, a number of tribes

scattered over the desert. They were driven back beyond the Libyan

mountains; fortresses* guarded the routes they had previously followed,

and they were obliged henceforward to renounce any hope of an invasion

_en masse_, and to content themselves with a few raiding expeditions

into the fertile plain of the Delta, where they had formerly found a

transitory halting-place. Counter-raids organised by the local troops

or by the mercenaries who garrisoned the principal towns in the

neighbourhood of Memphis--Hermopolis and Thinisl--inflicted punishment

upon them when they became too audacious. Their tribes, henceforward,

as far as Egypt was concerned, formed a kind of reserve from which the

Pharaoh could raise soldiers every year, and draw sufficient materials

to bring his army up to fighting strength when internal revolt or an

invasion from without called for military activity.

* _The Great Harris Papyrus_ speaks of fortifications

erected in the towns of Anhûri-Shû, possibly Thinis, and of

Thot, possibly Hermopolis, in order to repel the tribes of

the Tihonu who were ceaselessly harassing the frontier.

[Illustration: 318.jpg THE PRINCE OF THE KHATI]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph taken at Medinet-

Habu.

The campaign of the XIth year brought to an end the great military

expeditions of Ramses III. Henceforward he never took the lead in any

more serious military enterprise than that of repressing the Bedawin of

Seîr for acts of brigandage,* or the Ethiopians for some similar

reason. He confined his attention to the maintenance of commercial and

industrial relations with manufacturing countries, and with the

markets of Asia and Africa. He strengthened the garrisons of Sinai, and

encouraged the working of the ancient mines in that region. He sent a

colony of quarry-men and of smelters to the land of Atika, in order to

work the veins of silver which were alleged to exist there.**

*The Sâîrû of the Egyptian texts have been identified with

the Bedawin of Seîr.

** This is the Gebel-Ataka of our day. All this district is

imperfectly explored, but we know that it contains mines and

quarries some of which were worked as late as in the time of

the Mameluk Sultans.

He launched a fleet on the Red Sea, and sent it to the countries of

fragrant spices. “The captains of the sailors were there, together with

the chiefs of the _corvée_ and accountants, to provide provision” for

the people of the Divine Lands “from the innumerable products of Egypt;

and these products were counted by myriads. Sailing through the great

sea of Qodi, they arrived at Pûântt without mishap, and there collected

cargoes for their galleys and ships, consisting of all the unknown

marvels of Tonûtir, as well as considerable quantities of the perfumes

of Pûâtîn, which they stowed on board by tens of thousands without

number. The sons of the princes of Tonûtir came themselves into Qîmit

with their tributes. They reached the region of Coptos safe and sound,

and disembarked there in peace with their riches.” It was somewhere

about Sau and Tuau that the merchants and royal officers landed,

following the example of the expeditions of the XIIth and XVIIIth

dynasties. Here they organised caravans of asses and slaves, which

taking the shortest route across the mountain--that of the valley of

Rahanû--carried the precious commodities to Coptos, whence they were

transferred to boats and distributed along the river. The erection

of public buildings, which had been interrupted since the time of

Mînephtah, began again with renewed activity. The captives in the recent

victories furnished the requisite labour, while the mines, the voyages

to the Somali coast, and the tributes of vassals provided the necessary

money. Syria was not lost sight of in this resumption of peaceful

occupations. The overthrow of the Khâti secured Egyptian rule in this

region, and promised a long tranquillity within its borders. One temple

at least was erected in the country--that of Pa-kanâna--where the

princes of Kharu were to assemble to offer worship to the Pharaoh, and

to pay each one his quota of the general tribute. The Pulasati were

employed to protect the caravan routes, and a vast reservoir was

erected near Aîna to provide a store of water for the irrigation of the

neighbouring country. The Delta absorbed the greater part of the royal

subsidies; it had suffered so much from the Libyan incursions, that the

majority of the towns within it had fallen into a condition as

miserable as that in which they were at the time of the expulsion of the

Shepherds. Heliopolis, Bubastis, Thmuis, Amû, and Tanis still preserved

some remains of the buildings which had already been erected in them

by Ramses; he constructed also, at the place at present called Tel

el-Yahûdîyeh, a royal palace of limestone, granite, and alabaster, of

which the type is unique amongst all the structures hitherto discovered.

Its walls and columns were not ornamented with the usual sculptures

incised in stone, but the whole of the decorations--scenes as well

as inscriptions--consisted of plaques of enamelled terra-cotta set

in cement. The forms of men and animals and the lines of hieroglyphs,

standing out in slight relief from a glazed and warm-coloured

background, constitute an immense mosaic-work of many hues. The few

remains of the work show great purity of design and an extraordinary

delicacy of tone.

[Illustration: 320.jpg SIGNS, ARMS AND INSTRUMENTS]

All the knowledge of the Egyptian painters, and all the technical skill

of their artificers in ceramic, must have been employed to compose such

harmoniously balanced decorations, with their free handling of line and

colour, and their thousands of rosettes, squares, stars, and buttons of

varicoloured pastes.*

* This temple has been known since the beginning of the

nineteenth century, and the Louvre is in possession of some

fragments from it which came from Salt’s collection; it was

rediscovered in 1870, and some portions of it were

transferred by Mariette to the Boulaq Museum. The remainder

was destroyed by the fellahîn, at the instigation of the

enlightened amateurs of Cairo, and fragments of it have

passed into various private collections. The decoration has

been attributed to Chaldoan influence, but it is a work

purely Egyptian, both in style and in technique.

[Illustration: 321.jpg THE COLOSSAL OSIRIAN FIGURES in THE FIRST COURT

AT MEDINET-HABU]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Beato.

The difficulties to overcome were so appalling, that when the marvellous

work was once accomplished, no subsequent attempt was made to construct

a second like it: all the remaining structures of Ramses III., whether

at Memphis, in the neighbourhood of Abydos, or at Karnak, were in the

conventional style of the Pharaohs. He determined, nevertheless, to give

to the exterior of the Memnonium, which he built near Medinet-Habu for

the worship of himself, the proportions and appearance of an Asiatic

“Migdol,” influenced probably by his remembrance of similar structures

which he had seen during his Syrian campaign. The chapel itself is of

the ordinary type, with its gigantic pylons, its courts surrounded by

columns--each supporting a colossal Osirian statue--its hypostyle

hall, and its mysterious cells for the deposit of spoils taken from the

peoples of the sea and the cities of Asia. His tomb was concealed at a

distant spot in the Biban-el-Moluk, and we see depicted on its walls the

same scenes that we find in the last resting-place of Seti I. or Ramses

II., and in addition to them, in a series of supplementary chambers, the

arms of the sovereign, his standards, his treasure, his kitchen, and the

preparation of offerings which were to be made to him. His sarcophagus,

cut out of an enormous block of granite, was brought for sale to Europe

at the beginning of this century, and Cambridge obtained possession of

its cover, while the Louvre secured the receptacle itself.

These were years of profound tranquillity. The Pharaoh intended that

absolute order should reign throughout his realm, and that justice

should be dispensed impartially within it.

[Illustration: 322.jpg THE FIRST PYLON OF THE TEMPLE]

There were to be no more exactions, no more crying iniquities: whoever

was discovered oppressing the people, no matter whether he were court

official or feudal lord--was instantly deprived of his functions,

and replaced by an administrator of tried integrity. Ramses boasts,

moreover, in an idyllic manner, of having planted trees everywhere, and

of having built arbours wherein the people might sit in the shade in the

open air; while women might go to and fro where they would in security,

no one daring to insult them on the way. The Shardanian and Libyan

mercenaries were restricted to the castles which they garrisoned, and

were subjected to such a severe discipline that no one had any cause of

complaint against these armed barbarians settled in the heart of Egypt.

“I have,” continues the king, “lifted up every miserable one out of his

misfortune, I have granted life to him, I have saved him from the mighty

who were oppressing him, and have secured rest for every one in his own

town.” The details of the description are exaggerated, but the general

import of it is true. Egypt had recovered the peace and prosperity of

which it had been deprived for at least half a century, that is, since

the death of Mînephtah. The king, however, was not in such a happy

condition as his people, and court intrigues embittered the later years

of his life. One of his sons, whose name is unknown to us, but who is

designated in the official records by the nickname of Pentaûîrît, formed

a conspiracy against him. His mother, Tîi, who was a woman of secondary

rank, took it into her head to secure the crown for him, to the

detriment of the children of Queen Isît. An extensive plot was hatched

in which scribes, officers of the guard, priests, and officials in

high place, both natives and foreigners, were involved. A resort to

the supernatural was at first attempted, and the superintendent of the

Herds, a certain Panhûibaûnû, who was deeply versed in magic, undertook

to cast a spell upon the Pharaoh, if he could only procure certain

conjuring books of which he was not possessed. These were found to be

in the royal library. He managed to introduce himself under cover of the

night into the harem, where he manufactured certain waxen figures, of

which some were to excite the hate of his wives against their husband,

while others would cause him to waste away and finally perish. A traitor

betrayed several of the conspirators, who, being subjected to the

torture, informed upon others, and these at length brought the matter

home to Pentaûîrît and his immediate accomplices. All were brought

before a commission of twelve members, summoned expressly to try the

case, and the result was the condemnation and execution of six women and

some forty men. The extreme penalty of the Egyptian code was reserved

for Pentaûîrît, and for the most culpable,--“they died of themselves,”

and the meaning of this phrase is indicated, I believe, by the

appearance of one of the mummies disinterred at Deîr el-Baharî.* The

coffin in which it was placed was very plain, painted white and without

inscription; the customary removal of entrails had not been effected,

but the body was covered with a thick layer of natron, which was applied

even to the skin itself and secured by wrappings.

* The translations by Dévéria, Lepage-Renouf, and Erman

agree in making it a case of judicial suicide: there was

left to the condemned a choice of his mode of death, in

order to avoid the scandal of a public execution. It is also

possible to make it a condemnation to death in person, which

did not allow of the substitution of a proxy willing, for a

payment to his family, to undergo death in place of the

condemned; but, unfortunately, no other text is to be found

supporting the existence of such a practice in Egypt.

It makes one’s flesh creep to look at it: the hands and feet are tied

by strong bands, and are curled up as if under an intolerable pain;

the abdomen is drawn up, the stomach projects like a ball, the chest is

contracted, the head is thrown back, the face is contorted in a hideous

grimace, the retracted lips expose the teeth, and the mouth is open as

if to give utterance to a last despairing cry. The conviction is

borne in upon us that the man was invested while still alive with the

wrappings of the dead. Is this the mummy of Pentaûîrît, or of some

other prince as culpable as he was, and condemned to this frightful

punishment? In order to prevent the recurrence of such wicked plots,

Pharaoh resolved to share his throne with that one of his sons who had

most right to it. In the XXXIInd year of his reign he called together

his military and civil chiefs, the generals of the foreign mercenaries,

the Shardana, the priests, and the nobles of the court, and presented

to them, according to custom, his heir-designate, who was also called

Ramses. He placed the double crown upon his brow, and seated him beside

himself upon the throne of Horus. This was an occasion for the Pharaoh

to bring to remembrance all the great exploits he had performed during

his reign--his triumphs over the Libyans and over the peoples of the

sea, and the riches he had lavished upon the gods: at the end of the

enumeration he exhorted those who were present to observe the same

fidelity towards the son which they had observed towards the father, and

to serve the new sovereign as valiantly as they had served himself.

[Illustration: 327.jpg THE MUMMY OF RAMSES III.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a, photograph by Emil Brugsch-

Bey.

The joint reign lasted for only four years. Ramses III. was not

much over sixty years of age when he died. He was still vigorous and

muscular, but he had become stout and heavy. The fatty matter of the

body having been dissolved by the natron in the process of embalming,

the skin distended during life has gathered up into enormous loose

folds, especially about the nape of the neck, under the chin, on the

hips, and at the articulations of the limbs. The closely shaven head and

cheeks present no trace of hair or beard. The forehead, although neither

broad nor high, is better proportioned than that of Ramses II.; the

supra-orbital ridges are less accentuated than his, the cheek-bones not

so prominent, the nose not so arched, and the chin and jaw less massive.

The eyes were perhaps larger, but no opinion can be offered on this

point, for the eyelids have been cut away, and the cleared-out cavities

have been filled with rags. The ears do not stand out so far from the

head as those of Ramses II., but they have been pierced for ear-rings.

The mouth, large by nature, has been still further widened in the

process of embalming, owing to the awkwardness of the operator, who

has cut into the cheeks at the side. The thin lips allow the white and

regular teeth to be seen; the first molar on the right has been either

broken in half, or has worn away more rapidly than the rest. Ramses III.

seems, on the whole, to have been a sort of reduced copy, a little

more delicate in make, of Ramses II.; his face shows more subtlety

of expression and intelligence, though less nobility than that of the

latter, while his figure is not so upright, his shoulders not so

broad, and his general muscular vigour less. What has been said of

his personality may be extended to his reign; it was evidently and

designedly an imitation of the reign of Ramses IL, but fell short of its

model owing to the insufficiency of his resources in men and money. If

Ramses III. did not succeed in becoming one of the most powerful of the

Theban Pharaohs, it was not for lack of energy or ability; the depressed

condition of Egypt at the time limited the success of his endeavours and

caused them to fall short of his intentions. The work accomplished by

him was not on this account less glorious. At his accession Egypt was

in a wretched state, invaded on the west, threatened by a flood

of barbarians on the east, without an army or a fleet, and with no

resources in the treasury. In fifteen years he had disposed of his

inconvenient neighbours, organised an army, constructed a fleet,

re-established his authority abroad, and settled the administration

at home on so firm a basis, that the country owed the peace which it

enjoyed for several centuries to the institutions and prestige which

he had given it. His associate in the government, Ramses IV., barely

survived him. Then followed a series of _rois fainéants_ bearing the

name of Ramses, but in an order not yet clearly determined. It is

generally assumed that Ramses V., brother of Ramses III., succeeded

Ramses IV. by supplanting his nephews--who, however, appear to have

soon re-established their claim to the throne, and to have followed each

other in rapid succession as Ramses VI., Ramses VIL, Ramses VIII., and

Maritûmû.* Others endeavour to make out that Ramses V. was the son of

Ramses IV., and that the prince called Ramses VI. never succeeded to the

throne at all. At any rate, his son, who is styled Ramses VIL, but who

is asserted by some to have been a son of Ramses III., is considered to

have succeeded Ramses V., and to have become the ancestor from whom the

later Ramessides traced their descent.**

* The order of the Ramessides was first made out by

Champollion the younger and by Rosellini. Bunsen and Lepsius

reckon in it thirteen kings; E. de Rougé puts the number at

fifteen or sixteen; Maspero makes the number to be twelve,

which was reduced still further by Setho. Erman thinks that

Ramses IX. and Ramses X. were also possibly sons of Ramses

III.; he consequently declines to recognise King Maritûmû as

a son of that sovereign, as Brugsch would make out.

* The monuments of these later Ramessides are so rare and so

doubtful that I cannot yet see my way to a solution of the

questions which they raise.

The short reigns of these Pharaohs were marked by no events which would

cast lustre on their names; one might say that they had nothing else to

do than to enjoy peacefully the riches accumulated by their forefather.

Ramses IV. was anxious to profit by the commercial relations which

had been again established between Egypt and Puanît, and, in order to

facilitate the transit between Coptos and Kosseir, founded a station,

and a temple dedicated to Isis, in the mountain of Bakhni; by this

route, we learn, more than eight thousand men had passed under the

auspices of the high priest of Amon, Nakh-tû-ramses. This is the only

undertaking of public utility which we can attribute to any of these

kings. As we see them in their statues and portraits, they are heavy

and squat and without refinement, with protruding eyes, thick lips,

flattened and commonplace noses, round and expressionless faces. Their

work was confined to the engraving of their cartouches on the blank

spaces of the temples at Karnak and Medinet-Habu, and the addition of a

few stones to the buildings at Memphis, Abydos, and Heliopolis. Whatever

energy and means they possessed were expended on the construction of

their magnificent tombs.

[Illustration: 331.jpg A RAMSES OF THE XXth DYNASTY]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by Emil Brugsch-

Bey. This is the Ramses VI. of the series now generally

adopted.

These may still be seen in the Biban el-Moluk, and no visitor can

refrain from admiring them for their magnitude and decoration. As to

funerary chapels, owing to the shortness of the reigns of these kings,

there was not time to construct them, and they therefore made up for

this want by appropriating the chapel of their father, which was at

Medinet-Habu, and it was here consequently that their worship was

maintained. The last of the sons of Ramses III. was succeeded by another

and equally ephemeral Ramses; after whom came Ramses X. and Ramses XI.,

who re-established the tradition of more lasting reigns. There was

now no need of expeditions against Kharu or Libya, for these enfeebled

countries no longer disputed, from the force of custom, the authority of

Egypt. From time to time an embassy from these countries would arrive at

Thebes, bringing presents, which were pompously recorded as representing

so much tribute.* If it is true that a people which has no history

is happy, then Egypt ought to be reckoned as more fortunate under the

feebler descendants of Ramses III. than it had ever been under the most

famous Pharaohs.

* The mention of a tribute, for instance, in the time of

Ramses IV. from the Lotanu.

Thebes continued to be the favourite royal residence. Here in its temple

the kings were crowned, and in its palaces they passed the greater part

of their lives, and here in its valley of sepulchres they were laid

to rest when their reigns and lives were ended. The small city of the

beginning of the XVIIIth dynasty had long encroached upon the plain, and

was now transformed into an immense town, with magnificent monuments,

and a motley population, having absorbed in its extension the villages

of Ashirû,* and Madit, and even the southern Apît, which we now call

Luxor. But their walls could still be seen, rising up in the middle of

modern constructions, a memorial of the heroic ages, when the power of

the Theban princes was trembling in the balance, and when conflicts with

the neighbouring barons or with the legitimate king were on the point of

breaking out at every moment.**

* The village of Ashirû was situated to the south of the

temple of Karnak, close to the temple of Mût. Its ruins,

containing the statues of Sokhît collected by Amenôthes III.,

extend around the remains marked X in Mariette’s plan.

* These are the walls which are generally regarded as

marking the sacred enclosure of the temples: an examination

of the ruins of Thebes shows us that, during the XXth and

XXIst dynasties, brick-built houses lay against these walls

both on the inner and outer sides, so that they must have

been half hidden by buildings, as are the ancient walls of

Paris at the present day.

The inhabitants of Apît retained their walls, which coincided almost

exactly with the boundary of Nsîttauî, the great sanctuary of Amon;

Ashirû sheltered behind its ramparts the temple of Mût, while Apît-rîsît

clustered around a building consecrated by Amenôthes III. to his divine

father, the lord of Thebes. Within the boundary walls of Thebes extended

whole suburbs, more or less densely populated and prosperous, through

which ran avenues of sphinxes connecting together the three chief

boroughs of which the sovereign city was composed. On every side might

have been seen the same collections of low grey huts, separated from

each other by some muddy pool where the cattle were wont to drink

and the women to draw water; long streets lined with high houses,

irregularly shaped open spaces, bazaars, gardens, courtyards, and

shabby-looking palaces which, while presenting a plain and unadorned

exterior, contained within them the refinements of luxury and the

comforts of wealth. The population did not exceed a hundred thousand

souls,* reckoning a large proportion of foreigners attracted hither by

commerce or held as slaves.

* Letronne, after having shown that we have no authentic

ancient document giving us the population, fixes it at

200,000 souls. My estimate, which is, if anything,

exaggerated, is based on the comparison of the area of

ancient Thebes and that of such modern towns as Shit, Girgeh

and Qina, whose populations are known for the last fifty

years from the census.

[Illustration: 334.jpg MAP: THEBES IN THE XXTH DYNASTY]

The court of the Pharaoh drew to the city numerous provincials, who,

coming thither to seek their fortune, took up their abode there,

planting in the capital of Southern Egypt types from the north and

the centre of the country, as well as from Nubia and the Oases; such a

continuous infusion of foreign material into the ancient Theban stock

gave rise to families of a highly mixed character, in which all the

various races of Egypt were blended in the most capricious fashion. In

every twenty officers, and in the same number of ordinary officials,

about half would be either Syrians, or recently naturalised Nubians, or

the descendants of both, and among the citizens such names as Pakhari

the Syrian, Palamnanî the native of the Lebanon, Pinahsî the negro,

Palasiaî the Alasian, preserved the indications of foreign origin.*

A similar mixture of races was found in other cities, and Memphis,

Bubastis, Tanis, and Siût must have presented as striking an aspect

in this respect as Thebes.** At Memphis there were regular colonies of

Phoenician, Canaanite, and Amorite merchants sufficiently prosperous

to have temples there to their national gods, and influential enough to

gain adherents to their religion from the indigenous inhabitants. They

worshipped Baal, Anîti. Baal-Zaphuna, and Ashtoreth, side by side with

Phtah, Nofîrtûmû, and Sokhit,*** and this condition of things at Memphis

was possibly paralleled elsewhere--as at Tanis and Bubastis.

* Among the forty-three individuals compromised in the

conspiracy against Ramses III. whose names have been

examined by Dévéria, nine are foreigners, chiefly Semites,

and were so recognised by the Egyptians themselves--Adiram,

Balmahara, Garapusa, lunîni the Libyan, Paiarisalama,

possibly the Jerusalemite, Nanaiu, possibly the Ninevite,

Palulca the Lycian, Qadendena, and Uarana or Naramu.

** An examination of the stelæ of Abydos shows the extent of

foreign influence in this city in the middle of the

XVIIIth dynasty.

*** These gods are mentioned in the preamble of a letter

written on the _verso_ of the _Sallier Papyrus_. From the

mode in which they are introduced we may rightly infer that

they had, like the Egyptian gods who are mentioned with

them, their chapels at Memphis. A place in Memphis is called

“the district called the district of the Khâtiû” is an

inscription of the IIIth year of Aï, and shows that Hittites

were there by the side of Canaanites.

This blending of races was probably not so extensive in the country

districts, except in places where mercenaries were employed as

garrisons; but Sudanese or Hittite slaves, brought back by the soldiers

of the ranks, had introduced Ethiopian and Asiatic elements into many a

family of the fellahîn.*

* One of the letters in the Great Bologna Papyrus treats of

a Syrian slave, employed as a cultivator at Hermopolis, who

had run away from his master.

We have only to examine in any of our museums the statues of the

Memphite and Theban periods respectively, to see the contrast between

the individuals represented in them as far as regards stature and

appearance. Some members of the courts of the Ramessides stand out as

genuine Semites notwithstanding the disguise of their Egyptian names;

and in the times of Kheops and Ûsirtasen they would have been regarded

as barbarians. Many of them exhibit on their faces a blending of the

distinctive features of one or other of the predominant Oriental races

of the time. Additional evidence of a mixture of races is forthcoming

when we examine with an unbiased mind the mummies of the period, and

the complexity of the new elements introduced among the people by the

political movements of the later centuries is thus strongly confirmed.

The new-comers had all been absorbed and assimilated by the country, but

the generations which arose from this continual cross-breeding, while

representing externally the Egyptians of older epochs, in manners,

language, and religion, were at bottom something different, and

the difference became the more accentuated as the foreign elements

increased. The people were thus gradually divested of the character

which had distinguished them before the conquest of Syria; the

dispositions and defects imported from without counteracted to such

an extent their own native dispositions and defects that all marks of

individuality were effaced and nullified. The race tended to become more

and more what it long continued to be afterwards,--a lifeless and inert

mass, without individual energy--endowed, it is true, with patience,

endurance, cheerfulness of temperament, and good nature, but with little

power of self-government, and thus forced to submit to foreign masters

who made use of it and oppressed it without pity.

The upper classes had degenerated as much as the masses. The feudal

nobles who had expelled the Shepherds, and carried the frontiers of

the empire to the banks of the Euphrates, seemed to have expended their

energies in the effort, and to have almost ceased to exist. As long as

Egypt was restricted to the Nile valley, there was no such disproportion

between the power of the Pharaoh and that of his feudatories as to

prevent the latter from maintaining their privileges beside, and, when

occasion arose, even against the monarch. The conquest of Asia, while it

compelled them either to take up arms themselves or to send their

troops to a distance, accustomed them and their soldiers to a passive

obedience. The maintenance of a strict discipline in the army was the

first condition of successful campaigning at great distances from the

mother country and in the midst of hostile people, and the unquestioning

respect which they had to pay to the orders of their general prepared

them for abject submission to the will of their sovereign. To their

bravery, moveover, they owed not only money and slaves, but also

necklaces and bracelets of honour, and distinctions and offices in

the Pharaonic administration. The king, in addition, neglected no

opportunity for securing their devotion to himself. He gave to them

in marriage his sisters, his daughters, his cousins, and any of the

princesses whom he was not compelled by law to make his own wives. He

selected from their harems nursing-mothers for his own sons, and this

choice established between him and them a foster relationship, which

was as binding among the Egyptians and other Oriental peoples as one of

blood. It was not even necessary for the establishment of this relation

that the foster-mother’s connexion with the Pharaoh’s son should be

durable or even effective: the woman had only to offer her breast to

the child for a moment, and this symbol was quite enough to make her his

nurse--his true _monâît_. This fictitious fosterage was carried so far,

that it was even made use of in the case of youths and persons of mature

age. When an Egyptian woman wished to adopt an adult, the law prescribed

that she should offer him the breast, and from that moment he became her

son. A similar ceremony was prescribed in the case of men who wished to

assume the quality of male nurse--_monâî_--or even, indeed, of female

nurse--_monâît_--like that of their wives; according to which they were

to place, it would seem, the end of one of their fingers in the mouth

of the child.* Once this affinity was established, the fidelity of these

feudal lords was established beyond question; and their official duties

to the sovereign were not considered as accomplished when they had

fulfilled their military obligations, for they continued to serve him in

the palace as they had served him on the field. Wherever the necessities

of the government called them--at Memphis, at Ramses, or elsewhere--they

assembled around the Pharaoh; like him they had their palaces at Thebes,

and when they died they were anxious to be buried there beside him.**

* These symbolical modes of adoption were first pointed out

by Maspero. Legend has given examples of them: as, for

instance, where Isis fosters the child of Malkander, King of

Byblos, by inserting the tip of her finger in its mouth.

** The tomb of a prince of Tobûî, the lesser Aphroditopolis,

was discovered at Thebes by Maspero. The rock-out tombs of

two Thinite princes were noted in the same necropolis. These

two were of the time of Thûtmosis III. I have remarked in

tombs not yet made public the mention of princes of El-Kab,

who played an important part about the person of the

Pharaohs down to the beginning of the XXth dynasty.

Many of the old houses had become extinct, while others, owing to

marriages, were absorbed into the royal family; the fiefs conceded to

the relations or favourites of the Pharaoh continued to exist, indeed,

as of old, but the ancient distrustful and turbulent feudality had given

place to an aristocracy of courtiers, who lived oftener in attendance on

the monarch than on their own estates, and whose authority continued to

diminish to the profit of the absolute rule of the king. There would

be nothing astonishing in the “count” becoming nothing more than a

governor, hereditary or otherwise, in Thebes itself; he could hardly be

anything higher in the capital of the empire.* But the same restriction

of authority was evidenced in all the provinces: the recruiting of

soldiers, the receipt of taxes, most of the offices associated with the

civil or military administration, became more and more affairs of the

State, and passed from the hands of the feudal lord into those of the

functionaries of the Crown. The few barons who still lived on their

estates, while they were thus dispossessed of the greater part of their

prerogatives, obtained some compensation, on the other hand, on the side

of religion. From early times they had been by birth the heads of the

local cults, and their protocol had contained, together with those

titles which justified their possession of the temporalities of the

nome, others which attributed to them spiritual supremacy. The sacred

character with which they were invested became more and more prominent

in proportion as their political influence became curtailed, and we find

scions of the old warlike families or representatives of a new lineage

at Thinis, at Akhmîm,** in the nome of Baalû, at Hierâconpolis,***

at El-Kab,**** and in every place where we have information from the

monuments as to their position, bestowing more concern upon their

sacerdotal than on their other duties.

* Rakhmirî and his son Manakhpirsonbû were both “counts “of

Thebes under Thûtmosis III., and there is nothing to show

that there was any other person among them invested with the

same functions and belonging to a different family.

** For example, the tomb of Anhûrimôsû, high priest of

Anhuri-Shû and prince of Thinis, under Mînephtah, where the

sacerdotal character is almost exclusively prominent. The

same is the case with the tombs of the princes of Akhmîm in

the time of Khûniatonû and his successors: the few still

existing in 1884-5 have not been published. The stelæ

belonging to them are at Paris and Berlin.

*** Horimôsû, Prince of Hierâconpolis under Thûtmosis III.,

is, above everything else, a prophet of the local Horus.

**** The princes of El-Kab during the XIXth and XXth

dynasties were, before everything, priests of Nekhabit, as

appears from an examination of their tombs, which, lying in

a side valley, far away from the tomb of Pihirî, are rarely

visited.

This transfiguration of the functions of the barons, which had been

completed under the XIXth and XXth dynasties, corresponded with a

more general movement by which the Pharaohs themselves were driven to

accentuate their official position as high priests, and to assign to

their sons sacerdotal functions in relation to the principal deities.

This rekindling of religious fervour would not, doubtless, have

restrained military zeal in case of war;* but if it did not tend to

suppress entirely individual bravery, it discouraged the taste for arms

and for the bold adventures which had characterised the old feudality.

* The sons of Ramses II., Khâmoîsît and Marîtùmû, were bravo

warriors in spite of their being high priests of Phtah at

Memphis, and of Râ at Heliopolis.

The duties of sacrificing, of offering prayer, of celebrating the sacred

rites according to the prescribed forms, and rendering due homage to the

gods in the manner they demanded, were of such an exactingly scrupulous

and complex character that the Pharaohs and the lords of earlier times

had to assign them to men specially fitted for, and appointed to, the

task; now that they had assumed these absorbing functions themselves,

they were obliged to delegate to others an increasingly greater

proportion of their civil and military duties. Thus, while the king

and his great vassals were devoutly occupying themselves in matters of

worship and theology, generals by profession were relieving them of

the care of commanding their armies; and as these individuals were

frequently the chiefs of Ethiopian, Asiatic, and especially of Libyan

bands, military authority, and, with it, predominant influence in the

State were quickly passing into the hands of the barbarians. A sort of

aristocracy of veterans, notably of Shardana or Mashauasha, entirely

devoted to arms, grew up and increased gradually side by side with the

ancient noble families, now by preference devoted to the priesthood.*

* This military aristocracy was fully developed in the XXIst

and XXIInd dynasties, but it began to take shape after

Ramses III. had planted the Shardana and Qahaka in certain

towns as garrisons.

The barons, whether of ancient or modern lineage, were possessed of

immense wealth, especially those of priestly families. The tribute and

spoil of Asia and Africa, when once it had reached Egypt, hardly ever

left it: they were distributed among the population in proportion to the

position occupied by the recipients in the social scale. The commanders

of the troops, the attendants on the king, the administrators of the

palace and temples, absorbed the greater part, but the distribution

was carried down to the private soldier and his relations in town or

country, who received some of the crumbs. When we remember for a moment

the four centuries and more during which Egypt had been reaping the

fruits of her foreign conquest, we cannot think without amazement of

the quantities of gold and other precious metals which must have been

brought in divers forms into the valley of the Nile.* Every fresh

expedition made additions to these riches, and one is at a loss to know

whence in the intervals between two defeats the conquered could procure

so much wealth, and why the sources were never exhausted nor became

impoverished. This flow of metals had an influence upon commercial

transactions, for although trade was still mainly carried on by barter,

the mode of operation was becoming changed appreciably. In exchanging

commodities, frequent use was now made of rings and ingots of a certain

prescribed weight in _tabonû_; and it became more and more the custom

to pay for goods by a certain number of _tabonû_ of gold, silver, or

copper, rather than by other commodities: it was the practice even

to note down in invoices or in the official receipts, alongside the

products or manufactured articles with which payments were made, the

value of the same in weighed metal.**

* The quantity of gold in ingots or rings, mentioned in the

_Annals of Tkutmosis III._, represents altogether a weight

of nearly a ton and a quarter, or in value some £140,000 of

our money. And this is far from being the whole of the metal

obtained from the enemy, for a large portion of the

inscription has disappeared, and the unrecorded amount might

be taken, without much risk of error, at as much as that of

which we have evidence--say, some two and a half tons,

which Thûtmosis had received or brought back between the

years XXIII. and XLII. of his reign--an estimation rather

under than over the reality. These figures, moreover, take

no account of the vessels and statues, or of the furniture

and arms plated with gold. Silver was not received in such

large quantities, but it was of great value, and the like

may be said of copper and lead.

* The facts justifying this position were observed and put

together for the first time by Chabas: a translation is

given in his memoir of a register of the XXth or XXIst

dynasty, which gives the price of butcher’s meat, both in

gold and silver, at this date. Fresh examples have been

since collected by Spiegelberg, who has succeeded in drawing

up a kind of tariff for the period between the XVIIIth and

XXth dynasties.

This custom, although not yet widely extended, placed at the disposal

of trade enormous masses of metal, which were preserved in the form of

ingots or bricks, except the portion which went to the manufacture of

rings, jewellery, or valuable vessels.*

* There are depicted on the monuments bags or heaps of gold

dust, ingots in the shape of bricks, rings, and vases,

arranged alongside each other.

The general prosperity encouraged a passion for goldsmith’s work, and

the use of bracelets, necklaces, and chains became common among classes

of the people who were not previously accustomed to wear them. There was

henceforward no scribe or merchant, however poor he might be, who had

not his seal made of gold or silver, or at any rate of copper gilt. The

stone was sometimes fixed, but frequently arranged so as to turn round

on a pivot; while among people of superior rank it had some emblem

or device upon it, such as a scorpion, a sparrow-hawk, a lion, or

a cynocephalous monkey. Chains occupied the same position among the

ornaments of Egyptian women as rings among men; they were indispensable

decorations. Examples of silver chains are known of some five feet

in length, while others do not exceed two to three inches. There are

specimens in gold of all sizes, single, double, and triple, with large

or small links, some thick and heavy, while others are as slight and

flexible as the finest Venetian lace. The poorest peasant woman, alike

with the lady of the court, could boast of the possession of a chain,

and she must have been in dire poverty who had not some other ornament

in her jewel-case. The jewellery of Queen Âhhotpû shows to what degree

of excellence the work of the Egyptian goldsmiths had attained at the

time of the expulsion of the Nyksôs: they had not only preserved the

good traditions of the best workmen of the XIIth dynasty, but they had

perfected the technical details, and had learned to combine form and

colour with a greater skill. The pectorals of Prince Khâmoîsît and the

Lord Psaru,now in the Louvre, but which were originally placed in the

tomb of the Apis in the time of Ramses II., are splendid examples.

[Illustration: 345.jpg PECTORAL OF RAMSES II.]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from the jewel in the Louvre.

The most common form of these represents in miniature the front of a

temple with a moulded or flat border, surmounted by a curved cornice.

In one of them, which was doubtless a present from the king himself, the

cartouche, containing the first name of the Pharaoh-Usirmari, appears

just below the frieze, and serves as a centre for the design within the

frame. The wings of the ram-headed sparrow-hawk, the emblem of Amonrâ,

are so displayed as to support it, while a large urseus and a vulture

beneath embracing both the sparrow-hawk and the cartouche with outspread

wings give the idea of divine protection. Two _didû_, each of them

filling one of the lower corners, symbolise duration. The framework of

the design is made up of divisions marked out in gold, and filled either

with coloured enamels or pieces of polished stone. The general effect is

one of elegance, refinement, and harmony, the three principal elements

of the design becoming enlarged from the top downwards in a deftly

adjusted gradation. The dead-gold of the cartouche in the upper centre

is set off below by the brightly variegated and slightly undulating band

of colours of the sparrow-hawk, while the urseus and vulture, associated

together with one pair of wings, envelope the upper portions in a

half-circle of enamels, of which the shades pass from red through

green to a dull blue, with a freedom of handling and a skill in the

manipulation of colour which do honour to the artist. It was not his

fault if there is still an element of stiffness in the appearance of the

pectoral as a whole, for the form which religious tradition had imposed

upon the jewel was so rigid that no artifice could completely get over

this defect. It is a type which arose out of the same mental concepts

as had given birth to Egyptian architecture and sculpture--monumental in

character, and appearing often as if designed for colossal rather than

ordinary beings. The dimensions, too overpowering for the decoration of

normal men or women, would find an appropriate place only on the breasts

of gigantic statues: the enormous size of the stone figures to which

alone they are adapted would relieve them, and show them in their proper

proportions. The artists of the second Theban empire tried all they

could, however, to get rid of the square framework in which the sacred

bird is enclosed, and we find examples among the pectorals in the Louvre

of the sparrow-hawk only with curved wings, or of the ram-headed hawk

with the wings extended; but in both of them there is displayed the same

brilliancy, the same purity of line, as in the square-shaped jewels,

while the design, freed from the trammels of the hampering enamelled

frame, takes on a more graceful form, and becomes more suitable for

personal decoration.

[Illustration: 347.jpg THE RAM-HEADED SPARROW-HAWK IN THE LOUVRE]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a jewel in the Louvre.

The ram’s head in the second case excels in the beauty of its

workmanship anything to be found elsewhere in the museums of Europe or

Egypt. It is of the finest gold, but its value does not depend upon the

precious material: the ancient engraver knew how to model it with a bold

and free hand, and he has managed to invest it with as much dignity

as if he had been carving his subject in heroic size out of a block of

granite or limestone. It is not an example of pure industrial art, but

of an art for which a designation is lacking. Other examples, although

more carefully executed and of more costly materials, do not approach it

in value: such, for instance, are the earrings of Ramses XII. at

Gîzeh, which are made up of an ostentatious combination of disks,

filigree-work, chains, beads, and hanging figures of the urseus.

To get an idea of the character of the plate on the royal sideboards, we

must have recourse to the sculptures in the temples, or to the paintings

on the tombs: the engraved gold or silver centrepieces, dishes, bowls,

cups, and amphoras, if valued by weight only, were too precious to

escape the avarice of the impoverished generations which followed the

era of Theban prosperity. In the fabrication of these we can trace

foreign influences, but not to the extent of a predominance over native

art: even if the subject to be dealt with by the artist happened to be a

Phoenician god or an Asiatic prisoner, he was not content with slavishly

copying his model; he translated it and interpreted it, so as to give it

an Egyptian character.

The household furniture was in keeping with these precious objects.

Beds and armchairs in valuable woods, inlaid with ivory, carved, gilt,

painted in subdued and bright colours, upholstered with mattresses

and cushions of many-hued Asiatic stuffs, or of home-made materials,

fashioned after Chaldæan patterns, were in use among the well-to-do,

while people of moderate means had to be content with old-fashioned

furniture of the ancient regime.

[Illustration: 348.jpg DECORATED ARMCHAIR]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from one of these objects in the

tomb of Ramses III.

The Theban dwelling-house was indeed more sumptuously furnished than the

earliest Memphite, but we find the same general arrangements in both,

which provided, in addition to quarters for the masters, a similar

number of rooms intended for the slaves, for granaries, storehouses, and

stables. While the outward decoration of life was subject to change,

the inward element remained unaltered. Costume was a more complex

matter than in former times: the dresses and lower garments were more

gauffered, had more embroidery and stripes; the wigs were larger and

longer, and rose up in capricious arrangements of curls and plaits.

[Illustration: 349.jpg EGYPTIAN WIG]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a photograph by M. de Mertens.

The use of the chariot had now become a matter of daily custom, and

the number of domestics, already formidable, was increased by fresh

additions in the shape of coachmen, grooms, and _saises_, who ran before

their master to clear a way for the horses through the crowded streets

of the city.*

* The pictures at Tel el-Amarna exhibit the king, queen, and

princesses driving in their chariots with escorts of

soldiers and runners. We often find in the tomb-paintings

the chariot and coachman of some dignitary, waiting while

their master inspects a field or a workshop, or while he is

making a visit to the palace for some reward.

As material, existence became more complex, intellectual life partook of

the same movement, and, without deviating much from the lines prescribed

for it by the learned and the scribes of the Memphite age, literature

had become in the mean time larger, more complicated, more exacting,

and more difficult to grapple with and to master. It had its classical

authors, whose writings were committed to memory and taught in the

schools. These were truly masterpieces, for if some felt that they

understood and enjoyed them, others found them almost beyond their

comprehension, and complained bitterly of their obscurity. The later

writers followed them pretty closely, in taking pains, on the one hand

to express fresh ideas in the forms consecrated by approved and ancient

usage, or when they failed to find adequate vehicles to convey new

thoughts, resorting in their lack of imagination to the foreigner for the

requisite expressions. The necessity of knowing at least superficially,

something of the dialect and writings of Asia compelled the Egyptian

scribes to study to some degree the literature of Phonecia and of

Chaldæa.

[Illustration: 350.jpg Page Image with Furniture]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from photographs of the objects in

the Museums of Berlin and Gîzeh.

From these sources they had borrowed certain formulae and incantation,

medical recipes, and devout legends, in which the deities of Assyria

and especially Astartê played the chief part. They appropriated in

this manner a certain number of words and phrases with which they were

accustomed to interlard their discourses and writings. They thought it

polite to call a door no longer by the word _ro_, but the term _tira_,

and to accompany themselves no longer with the harp _bordt_, but with

the same instrument under its new name _kinnôr_, and to make the _salâm_

in saluting the sovereign in place of crying before him, _aaû_. They

were thorough-going Semiticisers; but one is less offended by their

affectation when one considers that the number of captives in the

country, and the intermarriages with Canaanite women, had familiarised a

portion of the community from childhood with the sounds and ideas of the

languages from which the scribes were accustomed to borrow unblushingly.

This artifice, if it served to infuse an appearance of originality into

their writings, had no influence upon their method of composition. Their

poetical ideal remained what it had been in the time of their ancestors,

but seeing that we are now unable to determine the characteristic

cadence of sentences or the mental attitude which marked each generation

of literary men, it is often difficult for us to find out the qualities

in their writings which gave them popularity. A complete library of one

of the learned in the Ramesside period must have contained a strange

mixture of works, embracing, in addition to books of devotion, which

were indispensable to those who were solicitous about their souls,*

collections of hymns, romances, war and love songs, moral and

philosophical treatises, letters, and legal documents.

* There are found in the rubrics of many religious books,

for example that dealing with the unseen world, promises of

health and prosperity to the soul which, “while still on

earth,” had read and learned them. A similar formula appears

at the end of several important chapters of the _Book of the

Dead._

It would have been similar in character to the literary-possessions of

an Egyptian of the Memphite period,* but the language in which it was

written would not have been so stiff and dry, but would have flowed more

easily, and been more sustained and better balanced.

* The composition of these libraries may be gathered from

the collections of papyri which have turned up from time to

time, and have been sold by the Arabs to Europeans buyers;

e.g. the Sallier Collection, the Anastasi Collections, and

that of Harris. They have found their way eventually into

the British Museum or the Museum at Leyden, and have been

published in the _Select Papyri_ of the former, or in the

_Monuments Égyptiens_ of the latter.

The great odes to the deities which we find in the Theban _papyri_ are

better fitted, perhaps, than the profane compositions of the period,

to give us an idea of the advance which Egyptian genius had made in the

width and richness of its modes of expression, while still maintaining

almost the same dead-level of idea which had characterised it from the

outset. Among these, one dedicated to Harmakhis, the sovereign sun, is

no longer restricted to a bare enumeration of the acts and virtues of

the “Disk,” but ventures to treat of his daily course and his final

triumphs in terms which might have been used in describing the

victorious campaigns or the apotheosis of a Pharaoh. It begins with his

awakening, at the moment when he has torn himself away from the embraces

of night. Standing upright in the cabin of the divine bark, “the fair

boat of millions of years,” with the coils of the serpent Mihni around

him, he glides in silence on the eternal current of the celestial

waters, guided and protected by those battalions of secondary deities

with whose odd forms the monuments have made us familiar. “Heaven is

in delight, the earth is in joy, gods and men are making festival, to

render glory to Phrâ-Harmakhis, when they see him arise in his bark,

having overturned his enemies in his own time!” They accompany him from

hour to hour, they fight the good fight with him against Apopi, they

shout aloud as he inflicts each fresh wound upon the monster: they

do not even abandon him when the west has swallowed him up in its

darkness.* Some parts of the hymn remind us, in the definiteness of

the imagery and in the abundance of detail, of a portion of the poem

of Pentaûîrît, or one of those inscriptions of Ramses III. wherein he

celebrates the defeat of hordes of Asiatics or Libyans.

* The remains of Egyptian romantic literature have been

collected and translated into French by Maspero, and

subsequently into English by Flinders Petrie.

The Egyptians took a delight in listening to stories. They preferred

tales which dealt with the marvellous and excited their imagination,

introducing speaking animals, gods in disguise, ghosts and magic. One

of them tells of a king who was distressed because he had no heir, and

had no sooner obtained the favour he desired from the gods, than the

Seven Hathors, the mistresses of Fate, destroyed his happiness by

predicting that the child would meet with his death by a serpent, a dog,

or a crocodile. Efforts were made to provide against such a fatality by

shutting him up in a tower; but no sooner had he grown to man’s estate,

than he procured himself a dog, went off to wander through the world,

and married the daughter of the Prince of Naharaim. His fate meets him

first under the form of a serpent, which is killed by his wife; he is

next assailed by a crocodile, and the dog kills the crocodile, but as

the oracles must be fulfilled, the brute turns and despatches his master

without further consideration. Another story describes two brothers,

Anûpû and Bitiû, who live happily together on their farm till the wife

of the elder falls in love with the younger, and on his repulsing her

advances, she accuses him to her husband of having offered her violence.

The virtue of the younger brother would not have availed him much,

had not his animals warned him of danger, and had not Phrâ-Harmakhis

surrounded him at the critical moment with a stream teeming with

crocodiles. He mutilates himself to prove his innocence, and announces

that henceforth he will lead a mysterious existence far from mankind; he

will retire to the Valley of the Acacia, place his heart on the topmost

flower of the tree, and no one will be able with impunity to steal it

from him. The gods, however, who frequent this earth take pity on his

loneliness, and create for him a wife of such beauty that the Nile falls

in love with her, and steals a lock of her hair, which is carried by its

waters down into Egypt. Pharaoh finds the lock, and, intoxicated by

its scent, commands his people to go in quest of the owner. Having

discovered the lady, Pharaoh marries her, and ascertaining from her

who she is, he sends men to cut down the Acacia, but no sooner has the

flower touched the earth, than Bitiû droops and dies. The elder brother

is made immediately acquainted with the fact by means of various

prodigies. The wine poured out to him becomes troubled, his beer leaves

a deposit. He seizes his shoes and staff and sets out to find the heart.

After a search of seven years he discovers it, and reviving it in a vase

of water, he puts it into the mouth of the corpse, which at once returns

to life. Bitiû, from this moment, seeks only to be revenged. He changes

himself into the bull Apis, and, on being led to court, he reproaches

the queen with the crime she has committed against him. The queen causes

his throat to be cut; two drops of his blood fall in front of the gate

of the palace, and produce in the night two splendid “Persea” trees,

which renew the accusation in a loud voice. The queen has them cut down,

but a chip from one of them flies into her mouth, and ere long she gives

birth to a child who is none other than a reincarnation of Bitiû. When

the child succeeds to the Pharaoh, he assembles his council, reveals

himself to them, and punishes with death her who was first his wife

and subsequently his mother. The hero moves throughout the tale without

exhibiting any surprise at the strange incidents in which he takes

part, and, as a matter of fact, they did not seriously outrage the

probabilities of contemporary life. In every town sorcerers could be

found who knew how to transform themselves into animals or raise

the dead to life: we have seen how the accomplices of Pentaûîrît had

recourse to spells in order to gain admission to the royal palace when

they desired to rid themselves of Ramses III. The most extravagant

romances differed from real life merely in collecting within a dozen

pages more miracles than were customarily supposed to take place in the

same number of years; it was merely the multiplicity of events, and

not the events themselves, that gave to the narrative its romantic and

improbable character. The rank of the heroes alone raised the tale

out of the region of ordinary life; they are always the sons of kings,

Syrian princes, or Pharaohs; sometimes we come across a vague and

undefined Pharaoh, who figures under the title of Pîrûîâûi or Prûîti,

but more often it is a well-known and illustrious Pharaoh who is

mentioned by name. It is related how, one day, Kheops, suffering from

_ennui_ within his palace, assembled his sons in the hope of learning

from them something which he did not already know. They described to him

one after another the prodigies performed by celebrated magicians under

Kanibri and Snofrûi; and at length Mykerinos assured him that there

was a certain Didi, living then not far from Meîdum, who was capable of

repeating all the marvels done by former wizards. Most of the Egyptian

sovereigns were, in the same way, subjects of more or less wonderful

legends--Sesostris, Amenôthes III., Thûfcmosis III., Amenemhâît I.,

Khîti, Sahûrî, Usirkaf, and Kakiû. These stories were put into literary

shape by the learned, recited by public story-tellers, and received by

the people as authentic history; they finally filtered into the writings

of the chroniclers, who, in introducing them into the annals, filled

up with their extraordinary details the lacunæ of authentic tradition.

Sometimes the narrative assumed a briefer form, and became an apologue.

In one of them the members of the body were supposed to have combined

against the head, and disputed its supremacy before a jury; the parties

all pleaded their cause in turn, and judgment was given in due form.*

* This version of the _Fable of the Members and the Stomach_

was discovered upon a schoolboy’s tablet at Turin.

Animals also had their place in this universal comedy. The passions or

the weaknesses of humanity were attributed to them, and the narrator

makes the lion, rat, or jackal to utter sentiments from which he draws

some short practical moral. La Fontaine had predecessors on the banks of

the Nile of whose existence he little dreamed.

[Illustration: 357.jpg THE CAT AND THE JACKAL GO OFF TO THE FIELDS WITH

THEIR FLOCKS]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Lepsius.

As La Fontaine found an illustrator in Granville, so, too, in Egypt

the draughtsman brought his reed to the aid of the fabulist, and by his

cleverly executed sketches gave greater point to the sarcasm of story

than mere words could have conveyed. Where the author had briefly

mentioned that the jackal and the cat had cunningly forced their

services on the animals whom they wished to devour at their leisure, the

artist would depict the jackal and the cat equipped as peasants, with

wallets on their backs, and sticks over their shoulders, marching behind

a troup of gazelles or a flock of fat geese: it was easy to foretell the

fate of their unfortunate charges. Elsewhere it is an ox who brings

up before his master a cat who has cheated him, and his proverbial

stupidity would incline us to think that he will end by being punished

himself for the misdeeds of which he had accused the other. Puss’s sly

and artful expression, the ass-headed and important-looking judge, with

the wand and costume of a high and mighty dignitary, give pungency to

the story, and recall the daily scenes at the judgment-seat of the lord

of Thebes. In another place we see a donkey, a lion, a crocodile, and a

monkey giving an instrumental and vocal concert.

[Illustration: 358.jpg THE CAT BEFORE ITS JUDGE]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Lepsius.

A lion and a gazelle play a game of chess. A cat of fashion, with a

flower in her hair, has a disagreement with a goose: they have come to

blows, and the excitable puss, who fears she will come off worst in the

struggle, falls backwards in a fright. The draughtsmen having once found

vent for their satire, stopped at nothing, and even royalty itself did

not escape their attacks. While the writers of the day made fun of the

military calling, both in prose and verse, the caricaturists parodied

the combats and triumphal scenes of the Ramses or Thutmosis of the

day depicted on the walls of the pylons. The Pharaoh of all the rats,

perched upon a chariot drawn by dogs, bravely charges an army of cats;

standing in the heroic attitude of a conqueror, he pierces them with

his darts, while his horses tread the fallen underfoot; his legions

meanwhile in advance of him attack a fort defended by tomcats, with the

same ardour that the Egyptian battalions would display in assaulting a

Syrian stronghold.

[Illustration: 359.jpg A CONCERT OF ANIMALS DEVOTED TO MUSIC]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Lepsius.

This treatment of ethics did not prevent the Egyptian writers from

giving way to their natural inclinations, and composing large volumes

on this subject after the manner of Kaqîmni or Phtahhotpû. One of their

books, in which the aged Ani inscribes his Instructions to his son,

Khonshotpû, is compiled in the form of a dialogue, and contains the

usual commonplaces upon virtue, temperance, piety, the respect due to

parents from children, or to the great ones of this world from

their inferiors. The language in which it is written is ingenious,

picturesque, and at times eloquent; the work explains much that is

obscure in Egyptian life, and upon which the monuments have thrown no

light. “Beware of the woman who goes out surreptitiously in her town, do

not follow her or any like her, do not expose thyself to the experience

of what it costs a man to face an Ocean of which the bounds are

unknown.* The wife whose husband is far from home sends thee letters,

and invites thee to come to her daily when she has no witnesses; if

she succeeds in entangling thee in her net, it is a crime which is

punishable by death as soon as it is known, even if no wicked act has

taken place, for men will commit every sort of crime when under this

temptation alone.”

* I have been obliged to paraphrase the sentence

considerably to render it intelligible to the modern reader.

The Egyptian text says briefly: “Do not know the man who

braves the water of the Ocean whose bounds are unknown.”_To

know the man_ means here _know the state of the man_ who

does an action.

“Be not quarrelsome in breweries, for fear that thou mayest be denounced

forthwith for words which have proceeded from thy mouth, and of having

spoken that of which thou art no longer conscious. Thou fallest,

thy members helpless, and no one holds out a hand to thee, but thy

boon-companions around thee say: ‘Away with the drunkard!’ Thou art

wanted for some business, and thou art found rolling on the ground like

an infant.” In speaking of what a man owes to his mother, Ani waxes

eloquent: “When she bore thee as all have to bear, she had in thee a

heavy burden without being able to call on thee to share it. When thou

wert born, after thy months were fulfilled, she placed herself under a

yoke in earnest, her breast was in thy mouth for three years; in spite

of the increasing dirtiness of thy habits, her heart felt no disgust,

and she never said: ‘What is that I do here?’ When thou didst go to

school to be instructed in writing, she followed thee every day with

bread and beer from thy house. Now thou art a full-grown man, thou hast

taken a wife, thou hast provided thyself with a house; bear always in

mind the pains of thy birth and the care for thy education that thy

mother lavished on thee, that her anger may not rise up against thee,

and that she lift not her hands to God, for he will hear her complaint!”

The whole of the book does not rise to this level, but we find in it

several maxims which appear to be popular proverbs, as for instance: “He

who hates idleness will come without being called;” “A good walker comes

to his journey’s end without needing to hasten;” or, “The ox which

goes at the head of the flock and leads the others to pasture is but an

animal like his fellows.” Towards the end, the son Khonshotpû, weary of

such a lengthy exhortation to wisdom, interrupts his father roughly:

“Do not everlastingly speak of thy merits, I have heard enough of thy

deeds;” whereupon Ani resignedly restrains himself from further speech,

and a final parable gives us the motive of his resignation: “This is the

likeness of the man who knows the strength of his arm. The nursling who

is in the arms of his mother cares only for being suckled; but no sooner

has he found his mouth than he cries: ‘Give me bread!’”

It is, perhaps, difficult for us to imagine an Egyptian in love

repeating madrigals to his mistress,* for we cannot easily realise that

the hard and blackened bodies we see in our museums have once been men

and women loving and beloved in their own day.

* The remains of Egyptian amatory literature have been

collected, translated, and commentated on by Maspero. They

have been preserved in two papyri, one of which is at Turin,

the other in the British Museum. The first of these appears

to be a sort of dialogue in which the trees of a garden

boast one after another of the beauty of a woman, and

discourse of the love-scenes which took place under their

shadow.

The feeling which they entertained one for another had none of the

reticence or delicacy of our love: they went straight to the point, and

the language in which, they expressed themselves is sometimes too coarse

for our taste. The manners and customs of daily life among the Egyptians

tended to blunt in them the feelings of modesty and refinement to which

our civilization has accustomed us. Their children went about without

clothes, or, at any rate, wore none until the age of puberty. Owing to

the climate, both men and women left the upper part of the body more or

less uncovered, or wore fabrics of a transparent nature. In the towns,

the servants who moved about their masters or his guests had merely

a narrow loin-cloth tied round their hips; while in the country, the

peasants dispensed with even this covering, and the women tucked up

their garments when at work so as to move more freely. The religious

teaching and the ceremonies connected with their worship drew the

attention of the faithful to the unveiled human form of their gods, and

the hieroglyphs themselves contained pictures which shock our sense of

propriety. Hence it came about that the young girl who was demanded in

marriage had no idea, like the maiden of to-day, of the vague delights

of an ideal union. The physical side was impressed upon her mind,

and she was well aware of the full meaning of her consent. Her lover,

separated from her by her disapproving parents, thus expresses the grief

which overwhelms him: “I desire to lie down in my chamber,--for I am

sick on thy account,--and the neighbours come to visit me.--Ah! if my

sister but came with them,--she would show the physicians what ailed

me,--for she knows my sickness!” Even while he thus complains, he sees

her in his imagination, and his spirit visits the places she frequents:

“The villa of my sister,--(a pool is before the house),--the door opens

suddenly,--and my sister passes out in wrath.--Ah! why am I not the

porter,--that she might give me her orders!--I should at least hear

her voice, even were she angry,--and I, like a little boy, full of fear

before her!” Meantime the young girl sighs in vain for “her brother, the

beloved of her heart,” and all that charmed her before has now ceased to

please her. “I went to prepare my snare, my cage and the covert for

my trap--for all the birds of Puânît alight upon Egypt, redolent with

perfume;--he who flies foremost of the flock is attracted by my worm,

bringing odours from Puânît,--its claws full of incense.--But my heart

is with thee, and desires that we should trap them together,--I with

thee, alone, and that thou shouldest be able to hear the sad cry of

my perfumed bird,--there near to me, close to me, I will make ready

my trap,--O my beautiful friend, thou who goest to the field of the

well-beloved!” The latter, however, is slow to appear, the day passes

away, the evening comes on: “The cry of the goose resounds--which is

caught by the worm-bait,--but thy love removes me far from the bird, and

I am unable to deliver myself from it; I will carry off my net, and what

shall I say to my mother,--when I shall have returned to her?--Every day

I come back laden with spoil,--but to-day I have not been able to set

my trap,--for thy love makes me its prisoner!” “The goose flies away,

alights,--it has greeted the barns with its cry;--the flock of birds

increases on the river, but I leave them alone and think only of thy

love,--for my heart is bound to thy heart--and I cannot tear myself

away from thy beauty.” Her mother probably gave her a scolding, but she

hardly minds it, and in the retirement of her chamber never wearies

of thinking of her brother, and of passionately crying for him: “O my

beautiful friend! I yearn to be with thee as thy wife--and that thou

shouldest go whither thou wishest with thine arm upon my arm,--for then

I will repeat to my heart, which is in thy breast, my supplications.--If

my great brother does not come to-night,--I am as those who lie in the

tomb--for thou, art thou not health and life,--he who transfers the joys

of thy health to my heart which seeks thee?” The hours pass away and

he does not come, and already “the voice of the turtle-dove speaks,--it

says: ‘Behold, the dawn is here, alas! what is to become of me?’ Thou,

thou art the bird, thou callest me,--and I find my brother in his

chamber,--and my heart is rejoiced to see him!--I will never go away

again, my hand will remain in thy hand,--and when I wander forth, I will

go with thee into the most beautiful places,--happy in that he makes me

the foremost of women--and that he does not break my heart.” We should

like to quote the whole of it, but the text is mutilated, and we are

unable to fill in the blanks. It is, nevertheless, one of those products

of the Egyptian mind which it would have been easy for us to appreciate

from beginning to end, without effort and almost without explanation.

The passion in it finds expression in such sincere and simple language

as to render rhetorical ornament needless, and one can trace in it,

therefore, nothing of the artificial colouring which would limit it to

a particular place or time. It translates a universal sentiment into the

common language of humanity, and the hieroglyphic groups need only to be

put into the corresponding words of any modern tongue to bring home

to the reader their full force and intensity. We might compare it with

those popular songs which are now being collected in our provinces

before the peasantry have forgotten them altogether: the artlessness of

some of the expressions, the boldness of the imagery, the awkwardness

and somewhat abrupt character of some of the passages, communicate to

both that wild charm which we miss in the most perfect specimens of our

modern love-poets.

END OF VOL. V.

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 5 (of 12) · 第 7 / 7 章