Returning to the Patio de los Leones, we enter, at its eastern

extremity, the Sala del Tribunal, or de la Justicia. This hall consists

of seven chambers opening on to a common vestibule. The four small rooms

are square, and are separated by three larger oblong apartments. The

same gorgeous colouring, the same profusion of geometrical

ornamentation, here as elsewhere in the Alhambra! The arch over the

central small chamber, or divan, is perhaps the finest in the whole

Palace. But what renders this hall the most remarkable in the edifice is

that it contains what are probably the only existing specimens of

mediæval Muslim figure painting. The ceiling of the central alcove or

_alhami_ is adorned by a painting representing ten personages, who were

formerly supposed to be judges, whence the name given to the hall. They

were intended, more probably, to represent the first ten sultans of the

Nasrite dynasty. The painting, like those in the other alcoves, is done

in bright colours (gold, green, red, &c.) on leather prepared with

gypsum. The designs appear to have been sketched in brown. The paintings

in the other _alhamis_ are of an even more interesting character. In the

first, a castle with square towers and battlements is seen; outside it

is a lion led in chains by a maiden, whose hands are rudely grasped by a

savage with shaggy hair and beard. A rescuer hurries to her assistance

in the person of a Christian knight, armed _cap-à-pie_. On the other

side of the picture, the same knight is shown attacked by a Moorish

cavalier, who plunges a lance into his breast. The Moor is evidently out

hunting, for beneath the combatants’ horses his dogs are chasing the

wild boar and fox. From the towers of the castle two fair ladies

observe, with evident pleasure, the Christian’s overthrow. In another

part of the picture both knights are shown, following the chase; and a

page is seen, leaning against a tree, with sword and shield, presumably

awaiting his master’s return.

The second painting is entirely devoted to hunting scenes. Moors are

seen chasing the wild boar, while the Christians occupy themselves with

bears and lions. The huntsmen are also seen returning and offering the

spoils of the chase to their ladies. The Moor greets his sultana with a

benign and condescending air; the Christian warrior kneels to the lady

and offers his prize.

The most competent critics have now arrived at the conclusion that these

paintings are of the fourteenth century, and therefore executed under

the Muslim sovereigns, in defiance of the precepts of the Koran. Whether

they were the work of a Mohammedan it is not so easy to say. Gayangos

has pointed out remarkable similarities between these paintings and

those in the Campo Santo at Pisa; and on the whole it is probable that

they were executed by an Italian artist, whom the Muslims may not have

scrupled to employ to do a thing for them unlawful. A parallel instance

of casuistry is that of London Jews, who on certain feasts employ

Christians to perform forbidden menial offices. It should also be said

that in the opinion of some modern Muslim doctors the prohibition of

sculpture and painting is not to be taken as absolute.

In the Sala de la Justicia was found a basin for ablutions, now in the

Museum, on which are interesting reliefs of lions, deer, and eagles.

According to the inscription, this was designed in 1305 for the service

of the mosque, a fact which seems to support the view of the authorities

just mentioned.

It was in this hall that Ferdinand and Isabel caused Mass to be

celebrated after the Reconquest, and here that the cross was set up by

Cardinal Mendoza. The devices of the Catholic sovereigns--the Yoke and

Sheaf of Arrows--have been introduced into the decoration of the

alcoves.

The ruinous tower and apartment to the south of the Hall of Justice,

called the Rauda, appears to have been the mausoleum of the Sultans. The

niches in which the _turbehs_ were placed may still be distinguished,

and the long, narrow trough used for the purification of the corpse. In

the Museum may be seen three tablets with the epitaphs of the Sultans

Yusuf III. and Mohammed II. and of a prince Abu-l-Hejaj, probably the

former’s son.

Of the few remaining apartments of the Alhambra, the most interesting

perhaps is the Tocador, or Queen’s Dressing-room, at the side of the

Patio de Lindaraja, opposite the Mirador de Lindaraja. This was the

apartment occupied by Washington Irving, according to his own showing:

“On taking up my abode in the Alhambra, one end of a suite of empty

chambers of modern architecture, intended for the residence of the

governor, was fitted up for my reception. It was in front of the

Palace.... I was dissatisfied with being lodged in a modern

apartment.... I found, in a remote gallery, a door communicating

apparently with an extensive apartment locked against the public.... I

procured the key, however, without difficulty; the door opened to a

range of vacant chambers of European architecture, though built over a

Moorish arcade.... This fanciful suite of rooms terminated in an open

gallery with balustrades, which ran at right angles with a side of the

garden.... I found that it was an apartment fitted up at the time when

Philip V. and the beautiful Elizabeth of Parma were expected at the

Alhambra, and was destined for the Queen and the ladies of her train.

One of the loftiest chambers had been her sleeping-room, and a narrow

staircase leading from it ... opened on to the delightful belvedere,

originally a mirador of the Moorish sultanas, which still retains the

name of the _tocador_. I determined at once to take up my quarters in

this apartment. My determination occasioned great surprise, but I was

not diverted from my humour.”

This exquisite apartment is adorned by four sixteenth-century paintings,

representing the legend of Phaëton. On the artesonado ceiling, painted

and gilded, may be read the invocation: “The help and protection of God

and a glorious victory for our Lord, Abu-l-Hejaj, Amir of the Muslims!”

Round the boudoir runs a gallery of nine arches on Arabic pillars,

painted and decorated with the figures of Faith, Hope, and Charity,

Justice, Strength, and Temperance, Jupiter, Neptune, Plenty, and the

Vestals’ Fire. These paintings were the work of two Italians, Giulio

Aquila and Sandro Mainere, both pupils of Raphael.

The charming little garden or patio of Lindaraja or Daraja, which

intervenes between this regal boudoir and the Moorish _mirador_, appears

to have been originally called _Jin Dar Aja_, or garden of the palace of

Ayesha. The old Moorish garden that used to extend as far as the Tower

of Comares is now confined by the walls of the Sala de las Ajimeces and

three arcades of modern construction. The fountain in the centre dates

from the seventeenth century. An enchanting spot is this, with its

cypress, orange, and citron-trees rising from trim hedges of myrtle and

rose.

Between this garden and the court of the Alberca lie the baths--those

indispensable adjuncts to the Muslim household--most skilfully and

artistically restored by Contreras. The plan is that usually followed

throughout the East. Passing through the _Sala de las Cámas_ or Unrobing

Room, where, from a high gallery the songs of the odalisques were wafted

down to the sultan reclining in one of the alcoves, we enter the Sala de

Baños, with its white marble bath and pavement of glazed tiles. This

corresponds with the apartment called by the Arabs, the hararah, or

vapour-bath, and described in Lane’s “Manners and Customs of the Modern

Egyptians”; and it was under the graceful arcades which support the

dome that the bathers underwent the kneading and rubbing processes

lately introduced among us. The chamber is lighted from above through

star-shaped apertures. The inscriptions refer to the felicity awaiting

men in this palace of delight. The bathing-apartments consist of three

halls and two smaller chambers, vulgarly called the Infantas’ Baths.

THE TOWERS AND GATES OF THE ALHAMBRA

“The wall of the Nasrites,” writes Señor Fernández Jiménez, “of which

scarcely a patch remains unimpaired, measured about 1400 metres from one

extremity to the other, and was defended by twenty-six towers, counting

as one the two buttresses that defended the gate of the Siete Suelos. To

this number should properly be added the Torre de las Armas, which is

pierced by a gate common to the Alcazaba and Alhambra, and is therefore

also a Nasrite work. The citadel was fortified, moreover, by five

bastions, corresponding to as many gates, and by various external

defences, of which traces remain in the modern alamedas. The thickness

of the towers varies according to their situation and purpose, the

distance between them ranging from 34 to 64 metres approximately.” At

the present day we can count only fifteen towers, the names of which

are: las Aguas, los Siete Suelos, las Cabezas, la Justicia, la Polvora,

los Hidalgos, la Vela, las Armas, las Gallinas, los Puñales, las Damas,

los Picos, del Candil, de la Cautiva, and las Infantas.

The Puerta de la Justicia is the principal entrance to the Alhambra. It

was built, as the inscription over the arch relates, by the Sultan Yusuf

Abu-l-Hejaj, in 1348. Here justice was administered in Moorish days

after the old patriarchal fashion. Above the arch is carved an open

hand, the signification of which is a matter of controversy. The most

probable explanation is that it is a religious symbol, the five fingers

typifying Faith in God and the Prophet, and the commandments, to pray,

to fast, to give alms, and to make the pilgrimage to Mecca. The inner

arch is beautifully decorated with arabesques, and with the symbol of

the key. The entrance is continued through another gate, with winding

passages contrived so as to embarrass an enemy. The arch which gives

egress from the tower shows some fine enamelling and festoons.

Just outside this gate is the Pilar de Carlos V., a fountain in the

Greco-Roman style, erected by the Alcaide Mendoza in 1545. It is

ornamented with the Imperial arms, and sculptured heads of the river

gods, Genil, Darro, and Beiro.

The double Torre de los Siete Suelos flanks a gateway, now walled up,

which was formerly the principal entrance to the fortress. Through it

the unfortunate Boabdil is said to have passed on his way to exile and

obscurity. The tower is so called because it is believed to descend

seven storeys underground. Four subterranean chambers have been

investigated. Here tradition places the site of much buried treasure,

and fables are told of phantom guards and enchanted sentries.

At the south-eastern angle of the _enceinte_ is the ruinous Torre del

Agua, which derives its name from the aqueduct that at this point spans

the ravine. On the north-eastern side we reach the Torre de las

Infantas, the interior of which is a perfect model of the smaller

Oriental dwelling-house. Through a small vestibule we reach a covered-in

patio with a fountain in the centre, and alcoves opening out on three

sides. The ornamentation is graceful and original. The tower is one of

the most interesting parts of the fortress. Somewhat less complete and

regular in its plan, but even more elegantly decorated with

rose-coloured tiles, is the adjoining Torre de la Cautiva (Captive’s

Tower). Here the inscriptions resound the praises of Abu-l-Hejaj and

refer to the _Lion_ residing within these walls--a very different

occupant from a captive!

The Torre de los Picos seems to have been so styled from the peaked

battlements which crown it. It evidently underwent extensive remodelling

about the time of the Spanish Reconquest, but some relics of the Nasrite

rule remain in the shape of some beautifully moulded twin windows.

The Torre de Ismaïl, or de las Damas (Ladies’ Tower), was given by

Mohammed V. to his son Ismaïl, and has a richly decorated belvedere and

a hall very tastefully ornamented. The ruined tower of Puñales has some

curious stucco decorations, differing from those found in other parts of

the palace.

Between the Torres de los Picos and de las Damas is a little _mihrab_ or

oratory built on the wall. At the Reconquest it was appropriated to the

private use of one Astasio de Bracamonte. Though it has undergone

deplorable “restorations,” the _kiblah_ or easterly niche and other

indications of the Muslim rite can still be made out. Strangely enough,

the portal is guarded by two Moorish lions brought from the old

Mint--the injunctions of the Mohammedan religion being thus ignored in

its own temple!

The parish church of Santa Maria, erected in 1581, occupies the site of

the Mosque of which Al Khattíb appears to speak, writing of the deeds

of Mohammed III. (1302-1309). “And among his great actions, the greatest

and most remarkable was the construction of the great Mosque or Aljama

of the Alhambra, with all that it contained of elegance and decoration,

mosaics, and cements; as well as lamps of pure silver and other great

marvels. In front of the Mosque were the baths, erected with the money

levied from the Christians in his dominions. With the receipts from

these baths the Mosque and its ministers were maintained.” The modern

church is of brick, and contains nothing of note, except a Visigothic

inscription, referring to the construction of three temples, dedicated

to St. Stephen, St. John, and St. Vincent, in the years 594 and 607.

THE PALACE OF CHARLES V.

The forlorn, roofless palace in the classical style, which seems so out

of place amid these Oriental buildings, was begun by order of the

Emperor Charles V. in 1538. It was never completed. The Flemish Cæsar’s

intention seems to have been to establish a permanent residence here,

whence he could contemplate the beauties of the Moorish palace. The

building is a quadrangle of four façades, each seventeen metres high.

The lower storey is of the Tuscan order, the upper, Ionic. Some of the

marble portals are very fine. In the decoration appear allusions to the

campaigns, on sea and land, directed by the Emperor, his motto, _Plus

oultre_, and the emblem of the Golden Fleece.

The interior of the palace is occupied by an imposing circular court,

with a gallery supported by thirty-two columns. The staircase is loftily

designed, and altogether the palace, if it had been completed and built

almost anywhere else, would have been a dignified memorial of Charles’s

reign.

THE GENERALIFE

Across an ivy-draped ravine--a perfect study in green and red--the

Palace of Recreations, the Generalife, overlooks the rugged walls of the

Alhambra. The name is believed to have been derived from Jennatu-l’arif,

“the garden of the architect.” The palace appears to have been built by

a Moor called Omar, from whom it was purchased by the Sultan

Abu-l-Walid. At the Reconquest it became the property of a renegade

prince, Sidi Yahya, who adopted the name of Don Pedro de Granada, and

whose descendants, the family of Campotejar, are to this day the actual

owners.

The Generalife cannot be regarded as an important monument of Moorish

architecture. Through the central court, which measures 48.70 by 12.80

metres, runs the conduit which irrigates the whole estate, and connects

with the Acequia (or canal) de la Alhambra. The arcaded southern façade

and the spacious hall adjoining have been altered in order to make a

large vestibule. The arcade resembles that of the Court of the

Fish-pond, and exhibits a poetical inscription declaring that

Abu-l-Walid restored the palace in the year 1319.

The halls of the Generalife are of little interest in themselves, and

contain several portraits of doubtful authenticity. Those of Ferdinand

and Isabel, of Juana la Loca and her husband, and of the fourth wife of

Philip II., are the most important. Among the portraits of the Granada

family is one supposed to be that of Ben Hud Al Mutawakil, the rival of

Al Ahmar, and ancestor of Sidi Yahya. This seems to be the portrait

which English travellers persist in mistaking for that of Boabdil.

But if the palace is in no way remarkable, the gardens are a veritable

bower of beauty and delight. Water bubbles up everywhere and moistens

the roots of myrtles, cedars, and tall cypresses, the finest trees in

all Spain. The legend of the Abencerrage discovered in dalliance with a

Sultana, beneath one of these cypresses, is absolutely destitute of any

sort of foundation. The nature of the spot--so eminently fitted for love

and lovers’ trysts--may have suggested the story. But the garden is

ill-kept, and many of the magnificent trees have been cut down.

* * * * *

In the city of Granada itself the memorials of the Moorish domination

are scanty and fast disappearing. In the Zacatin, which was in old

times the chief bazaar, is a building formerly styled the Casa del Gallo

de Viento (Weathercock House), and now known by the commonplace

designation of Casa del Carbon (Charcoal House), owing to its having

been appropriated to the storage of that useful product. Tradition avers

that the palace (for such the house at one time was) was built by Badis

Ibn Habus, a governor of Granada, who ruled about 1070 A.D., by whose

direction a vane was made in the shape of a warrior, mounted and armed

with shield and spear. In later years the building served as a corn

exchange. The only notable features are the entrance with its horseshoe

arch and twin-windows, and vestibule with dome and alcoves. Adjacent to

the Casa del Carbon is the house of the Duque de Abrantes. Beneath it is

said to be a subterranean passage communicating with the

Alhambra--blocked up, oddly enough, by the present owner of the site,

without any exploration or examination.

Entered from the Carrera de Darro is the once handsome Moorish bath

house, now in the last stages of dilapidation and neglect. It is

believed to date from the earliest period of Mohammedan rule. The arches

are of the old horseshoe type, and the columns and capitals of a

primitive order. An inscription beginning, “In the Name of God, the

Merciful, the Compassionate ...” may still be made out.

The bath itself, the various chambers of repose and disrobing, the usual

alhamies, can also be traced.

The old Moorish mint was demolished in 1643, and the famous Gate of

Bivarrambla can no longer be described in any sense as a Mohammedan

work.

The effacement of the Moorish character of Granada, as compared with its

survival in Seville, serves to show how much more intense the religious

and racial bias became in Spain during the two hundred and odd years

that elapsed between the conquests of the two cities. The spirit in

which St. Ferdinand, Alfonso el Sabio, and Pedro I. approached the works

of their Mohammedan foes and subjects presented a very favourable

contrast to that manifested by the Catholic sovereigns, Charles V. and

Philip II.

CATHOLIC GRANADA

Almost the first act performed by a Spanish king on his entry into a

conquered Mohammedan city was to convert the chief mosque (aljama) into

a Christian church. This was also done at Granada, but the chapel of the

Alhambra remained for some time the cathedral of the new See. The mosque

in the city, afterwards elevated to that rank, is described by the Abbé

Bertaut of Rouen (quoted by Valladar), writing in 1669, as “square, or

rather longer than wide, without vaults, and the roof covered with

tiles, which for the most part were not even joined. The whole was

supported by a number of small stone columns, harmoniously arranged.”

Jorquera says the mosque was composed of five low naves. Whether or not

it was originally a Visigothic church, as some writers pretend, the

temple probably dated from the earliest centuries of the Muslim

occupation, and the tower which contained the mihrab was long famous as

the Torre Turpiana.

The building, after serving the purposes of the Catholic rite for two

centuries, disappeared between 1705 and 1759 to make room for the

present sacristia (sacristy). As a cathedral, it had been superseded by

the adjoining and existing edifice, dedicated on August 17, 1561.

Older by about a quarter of a century than the foundations of the

cathedral is the Royal Chapel (Capilla Real), which is the most striking

and interesting memorial of the Conquest of Granada. It was begun in

1505 as a mausoleum for the Catholic sovereigns, Ferdinand and Isabella,

under the direction of the famous Enrique Egas, and completed in the

year 1517--a year after the king’s death and thirteen years after the

queen’s. The chapel is shaped like a Latin cross, and is one of the

latest specimens of the Spanish Gothic style. It is a comparatively

modest and simple building, contrasting strongly with the ornate and

elaborate structures of the succeeding age. The decoration of the

interior consists almost entirely in a frieze bearing a long inscription

in gilt letters which reads: “This chapel was ordered to be built by the

most Catholic Don Ferdinand and Doña Isabella,” &c. &c. There is a

suggestion of Gothic influence in the magnificent railing or grille,

partly of iron, partly gilt, which divides the nave from the transept,

and was made in 1522 by Maestre Bartolome. The kneeling figures of the

Catholic sovereigns are seen on either side of the high altar. These,

says Ford, “are very remarkable, being exact representations of their

faces, forms, and costumes: behind Ferdinand is the victorious banner of

Castile, while the absorbing policy for which both lived and died--the

conquest of the Moor and the conversion of the infidel--are embodied

beneath them in singular painted carvings; these have been attributed to

Felipe Vigarny, and are certainly of the highest antiquarian interest.

In that which illustrates the surrender of the Alhambra, Isabel is

represented riding on a white palfrey between Ferdinand and the great

Cardinal Mendoza, who sits on his trapped mule, like Wolsey. He alone

wears gloves; his pinched aquiline face contrasts with the chubbiness of

the king and queen. He opens his hand to receive the key, which the

dismounted Boabdil presents, holding it by the wards. Behind are ladies,

knights, and halberdiers, while captives come out of the gates in pairs.

Few things of the kind in Spain are more interesting. The other

basso-relievo records the ‘Conversion of the Infidel’; in it the

reluctant flock is represented as undergoing the ceremony of wholesale

baptism, the principal actors being shorn monks. The mufflers and

leg-wrappers of the women--the Roman _fasciæ_--are precisely those still

worn at Tetuan by their descendants.”

These reliefs are unquestionably more vigorous and artistic, and also

more in harmony with the structure generally, than the gorgeous

Renaissance cenotaphs of Ferdinand and Isabella--most probably the work

of the Spanish sculptor, Bartolome Ordoñez. The two great sovereigns are

shown lying side by side, the faces expressing infinite dignity and

repose. At each corner of the sepulchre is seated one of the four

Doctors of the Church, below whom is a Sphinx. Medallions on two of the

four sides represent respectively the Baptism and Resurrection of Jesus,

and St. George and St. James. Beautifully done are the figures of the

Twelve Apostles, the escutcheons, and, in fact, all the details of this

grandiose but unimpressive monument.

The adjacent sepulchre of Ferdinand and Isabella’s daughter, the unhappy

Queen Juana, and of her husband, Philip I., the Handsome, is inferior in

design and execution. The heads of the recumbent figures are not

faithful portraits. The reliefs represent the Nativity, the Adoration of

the Magi, the Agony in the Garden, and the Entombment. In the niches are

figures of the Cardinal Virtues (not conspicuous in Philip during life),

and at the corners the statues of Saints Michael, George, Andrew, and

John the Divine. Very beautiful are the figures of children, and much of

the heraldic decoration. The whole is in the most florid style of the

Renaissance, and was carved at Genoa by order of Juana’s son, Charles

V.

Granada and the Alhambra A brief description of the ancient city of Granada, with a particular account of the Moorish palace · 第 4 / 8 段