BEETHOVEN AS COMPOSER.

[Illustration]

The greatest of all instrumental composers began his career as a

pianoforte virtuoso, and his earlier compositions are chiefly for that

instrument. During the first years of Beethoven in Vienna, he was more

conspicuous as a virtuoso than as a composer, and it is said that Haydn

prophesied greater things of him as a performer than a creator of music.

The older master could not foresee that Beethoven's influence was destined

to live in his epoch-making concertos, trios and sonatas, rather than

in his wonderful piano playing. His superiority at Bonn as at Vienna

was not so much in display of technical proficiency as in the power and

originality of improvisation. When he was only eleven years of age Carl

Ludwig Junker heard the boy play, and wrote in most enthusiastic terms of

the inexhaustible wealth of his ideas; he also compared him with older

players of distinction and preferred Beethoven on account of his more

expressive, passionate performance, that spoke directly to the heart. And

so Czerny described his improvisation as "most brilliant and striking; in

whatever company he might chance to be, he knew how to produce such an

effect upon every hearer, that frequently not an eye remained dry, and

listeners would break out into loud sobs; for in addition to the beauty

and the originality of his ideas, and his spirited style of rendering

them, there was something in his expression wonderfully impressive." Ries

and many others bear similar testimony. There were other pianists of great

parts who lived in Vienna or were heard there: Steibelt, Wölffl, and

especially Hummel. But whenever Beethoven met them in friendly or fierce

rivalry, he conquered by richness of ideas, by variety of treatment and by

intense musical individuality, although he extemporized in regular "form."

Hummel excelled him undoubtedly in purity and elegance, and Wölffl had

extraordinary mechanism. They excited lively admiration, but Beethoven

moved the hearts of his hearers. This power was greater than even his

feats of transposing, his skill in reading scores, or such tricks as

turning the 'cello part of a quintet upside down and then extemporizing

from the curious theme formed thereby. We are told that he was very

particular as to the mode of holding the hands and placing the fingers,

in which he followed Emanuel Bach; his attitude at the pianoforte was

quiet and dignified, but as his deafness increased he bent more and

more toward the keys. He was, when he played, first of all a composer,

and in his maturity, the "composer's touch," distinguished his playing.

Czerny said that he produced wonderful effects by the use of the _legato

cantabile_. He was, as a rule, persuaded easily to improvise--at least in

his younger days--but he did not like to play his own compositions, and

only yielded to an expressed wish when they were unpublished. It is also

said that he interpreted his own compositions with freedom, although he

observed rigorously the beat. And he made often a profound impression in a

_crescendo_ by retarding the movement and not accelerating it.

The compositions of Beethoven have been divided by many writers into

three periods, and this division has been followed with absurd precision

and has been as unjustly ridiculed. There were three periods, however,

but they are not to be sharply defined; they correspond in general to

the life-periods of youth, maturity, and old age. In his earlier works,

he followed in some degree the path laid out by Haydn and Mozart; in

his middle period, he appeared in the full strength and maturity of his

wonderful originality; finally, in his last period, he revealed himself as

a prophet and dreamer of unearthly things. But it is not strange that the

style of a man of genius is modified by his age and his experience; that

he thinks otherwise at forty than he thought at twenty; that his ideas are

not rigid, immovable from youth to old age. In his earlier period, and in

the first of his symphonies, he shows the influence of his predecessors,

and yet in his sixteenth work, three trios, known as Op. 1, striking

originality and independence are asserted on every page.

It was his independence of character as much as his great musical gift

that impelled him on the path of progress. He was five years old when at

Concord

... "the embattled farmers stood

And fired the shot heard round the world."

He was the child of his time, and he lived to witness the great movement

for freedom and humanity in America and Europe. Although he had warm

friends and admirers among the nobility he would not bow down to rank and

wealth. The prince held no higher position in his estimation than the

private citizen. "It is good to be with the aristocracy," he said; "but

one must be able to impress them." "A trace of heroic freedom pervades

all his creations," says Ferdinand Hiller. The expression "Im Freien,"

which in German means both the open air and liberty, might serve as an

inscription of a temple devoted to his genius. It was this lofty spirit

that impelled him to find new methods of musical expression in the older

forms of the symphony, sonata, string quartet, etc., which have the same

general outlines of formal construction. These classical forms consist

of a cycle or group of three or four movements related to each other by

contrast in tempo, rhythm, key, and æsthetic character. These movements

are combined so as to constitute an organic whole; complex and highly

developed, like a great architectural building. Madame de Stael called

architecture "frozen music." This fanciful idea, so often quoted, suggests

a different conception, perhaps as near the truth, that music may be

considered as a kind of rhythmical architecture. Such architectural music

appeals to the æsthetic sense of form and proportion through the ear by

the stream of melody and harmony that flows in a rhythmical mass, whereas

the "frozen music" appeals to us through the eye, which is able to take in

the great outlines of proportion and form at once; so that the element of

time is not considered. So far as form and construction are concerned, a

Beethoven symphony might well be compared with a Gothic cathedral in its

grand outlines of beauty and strength, complexity, relation of the parts

to the whole, sense of proportion, and unity in variety. But in music, as

in all true art, form is but the means to an end: which is to move the

soul through the æsthetic sense of beauty. This ideal structure of tones

was not the invention of one musician; it was built up gradually, in the

course of a century and a half, by various composers until it reached its

culmination in the works of Beethoven. There are two distinct sources

from which cyclical instrumental music is derived. First, the sonatas

for violins and bass which sprang up in the 17th century under Corelli,

Biber, Purcell and others. Subsequently the sonata was applied to the

solo clavichord by Kuhnau, Sebastian and Emanuel Bach. Second, the Italian

opera overture, which came into vogue as separate instrumental music early

in the 18th century under the names of symphony and concerto. The Italian

overture consisted of three short, related movements--_allegro_, _adagio_,

_allegro_,--a slow movement between two fast ones. Sammartini, Emanuel

Bach and a few others were the first to cultivate this three-movement

form: but it was not until the advent of Haydn that its modern character

was acquired. Under his genius first came classical models. The sonatas

of Emanuel Bach were the starting point of Haydn's music. He worked out

gradually the so-called art of free thematic treatment. Compared with

the older style its chief features are greater freedom in developing the

themes; the parts are not bound down to the rules of strict counterpoint;

the melody is given chiefly to one voice, generally the upper. Free

passages are introduced between the several melodic groups that make up

the contrasted themes. A general air of lightness, grace, elegance and

pleasantness is the result of this freedom of treatment. A whole movement

is evolved out of little rhythmical motives or germs, which recur again

and again, under ever changing conditions of melody, harmony, key,

position or range, and instrumentation. By such kaleidoscopic changes

the motives express constantly new meaning and beauty without abandoning

the central idea of the piece. Then, too, each movement is polythematic

instead of monothematic. Haydn in these and other respects prepared the

way for Mozart and Beethoven, and neither of the three can be considered

without the other. Mozart and Beethoven obtained the structural form

and basis of instrumentation from Haydn; on the other hand, Haydn in

his old age and Beethoven in his youth learned from Mozart a richer art

of instrumental color and expressiveness, especially in the use of wind

instruments. While Mozart did not enlarge the cyclical forms beyond the

general outlines laid down by Haydn, he beautified and enriched them in

all their details. In his last three symphonies and famous six quartets

the beauty is more refined, the pathos more thrilling and profound, the

dissonances and modulations more daring and fascinating. His music is

conceived in a more serious vein.

[Illustration: BEETHOVEN'S MONUMENT IN VIENNA.

Famous composers and their works, Vol. 2 · 第 32 / 81 题