A few days since, I cut from the paper the following paragraph:--

"In the Kentucky House of Representatives, on Friday last, an

address was received by the Speaker, from Mrs. ----, of New York,

and read by the Clerk, asking the Legislature of the Southern

States to grant suffrage to white women in the South, so as to give

the Democratic party the advantage over the negro votes, if

Congress passes a general negro-suffrage law. By following out this

plan, Mrs. ---- thinks the South can govern the country, as in the

days of Jefferson."

I suppress the name, which was printed in full, in this paragraph,

because it is the name of a woman I respect; and I earnestly hope the

whole charge is false. If women seek to advance their own cause by mean

and meretricious tricks,--such as those which have dishonored the policy

of men,--may God for ever disappoint their hope! I would rather be

defeated with the friends of liberty than crowned with its foes. It is

because I believe woman strong enough to withstand the low and loose and

degrading temptations of public life that I would lead her towards it.

If she cannot enter it as an inspiration, may she be for ever shut out!

Mrs. Stanton and Miss Anthony, assisted by Lucy Stone and Antoinette

Blackwell, have been busy in agitating all legal questions, and

especially the right of suffrage, ever since the formation of the

Equal-Rights Association, in New York, in May, 1866. Wherever there is

any prospect of a convention to change a State Constitution, it would

seem wise to agitate the matter; but here, in Massachusetts, almost

every thing has been done that should be to protect women, except to

give them the right of suffrage. That question we are too wise to

agitate, until the country recovers somewhat from the anxieties and

perplexities of the war. We have no desire to win from an unjust judge,

for our importunity's sake, a right which could never be useful, unless

it were accorded with the hearty sympathy of the best part of the

community. On March 16, 1867, a motion was made in the Massachusetts

House to instruct the Judiciary Committee to report an amendment to the

State Constitution, granting the right of suffrage to women. The yeas

and nays were taken, and the motion was lost: yeas 44, nays 97.

In New York, Illinois, and Michigan, the question is to be brought

before the Constitutional Convention. Wisconsin is our banner State,

both branches of her government having concurred, April 4, 1867, in a

resolution to submit it to the people. In New York, last year, Mrs.

Stanton proposed herself as a candidate for Congress, and received, I

think, thirty votes. It was so well understood that her election was

impossible, that her card excited neither ridicule nor discussion. No

one cared to turn aside from more pressing interests to consider it. It

was therefore a waste of strength. I saw, with pain, that some women

did not shrink from employing last year a politician's trick, and sent

to Democratic members of the Senate and House the petitions for the

right of suffrage for women, with which they knew them to possess no

sympathy. Had these petitions been sent to Republican members of either

House, they might have been overlooked in the press of graver anxieties.

Mischievously sent to men like Cowan, women must have known that the

petition would be produced, if it was only to annoy and perplex our

honest friends of the Republican party. In what would our influence upon

politics be better than that of men, if we resort to such measures?

During the past year, I drew up, and forwarded to the Hon. Charles

Sumner, a petition for the right of suffrage, and afterwards sustained

it by two or three letters. I think Mr. Sumner never brought it forward;

but I gladly defer to his judgment as to that. It was my duty to keep

the subject in mind, and see that we did not appear, even in the tumult

left by civil war, to lose sight of our claim. I am glad to offer public

thanks to the Hon. George Thompson, who, in the meeting of the

Equal-Rights Association, held in Philadelphia on Jan. 17, 1867,

defeated a resolution of thanks to Mr. Cowan, and condemnation to Mr.

Sumner, on precisely these grounds. "To thank men like Cowan, who did

not _desire_ to enfranchise woman any more than the negro, was to

stultify ourselves," he said. "To condemn Sumner, because he did not

think _this_ the time to push the claims of woman, was not honorable to

the long-tried friend of human progress."

Abroad, such things look better. The clean hands of John Stuart

Mill--which no noble woman need fear to touch--have presented to

Parliament the petition of fifteen hundred women for the right of

franchise. This petition is so moderate and sensible, that it deserves

to be preserved.

"The humble petition of the undersigned showeth,--

"That it having been expressly laid down by high authorities, that

the possession of property, in this country, carries with it the

right to vote in the election of representatives in Parliament, it

is an evident anomaly, that some holders of property are allowed to

use this right, while others, forming no less a constituent part of

the nation, and equally qualified by law to hold property, are not

able to exercise this privilege; that the participation of women in

the government is consistent with the principles of the British

Constitution, inasmuch as women in these islands have always been

held capable of sovereignty, and women are eligible for various

public offices.

"Your petitioners, therefore, humbly pray your honorable House to

consider the expediency of providing for the representation of all

householders, without distinction of sex, who possess such property

or rental qualification as your honorable House may determine. And

your petitioners will ever pray.

"Mrs. W.B. CARPENTER, 56, Regent's Park Road, London, N.W.

C.M. CLARKSON, Hatfield Road, Wakefield.

FRANCES POWER COBBE, 26, Hereford Square, London, S.W.

ELIZABETH GARRETT, L.S.A., 20, Upper Berkeley Street, London, W.

MARY ANN GASKELL, Plymouth Grove, Manchester.

MATILDA M. HAYS, Great Malvern.

MARY HOWITT, West Hill Lodge, Highgate, N.

M.S. KINGLAKE, 50, Upper Brunswick Place, Brighton. ISA CRAIG

KNOX, 14, Clyde Terrace, New Cross, S.E. S.J. LEWIN, Birkenhead.

HARRIET LUPTON, St. Asaph. ELIZABETH MALLISON, Camp Cottage,

Wimbledon. HARRIET MARTINEAU, The Knoll, Ambleside. JANE MARTINEAU,

21, Tariton Street, London, W.C. JANE MOXON, 1, Cundall's Yard,

Leeds. MRS. ELIZABETH PEASE NICHOL, Huntly Lodge, Edinburgh. BESSIE

R. PARKES, 15, Wimpole Street, London, W. ELIZABETH PROCTOR, Polam

Hall, Darlington. C. STURCH, Cumberland Terrace, Regent's Park,

London, N.W. MRS. THOMAS TAYLOR, Aston House, Oxfordshire. SARAH

UNWIN, Hale Lodge, Edgeware, Middlesex. ANNA MARY HOWITT WATTS, 24,

Grove Terrace, Highgate Road."

I append to the above petition a few of the fifteen hundred names, which

will serve to give it identity, and interest in this country. We miss,

among the names, many names of the beloved dead; and many would

doubtless be there that we know, could it be signed by any save

property-holders.

A very powerful influence was brought to sustain this petition in

Parliament; and among its advocates were James Martineau, Herbert

Spencer, Professor Huxley, and Goldwin Smith. Mr. Mill seems to have

presented a second petition, headed by Lady Goldschmid, and signed by

three thousand persons; and another was offered, at the same time, by

Mr. Russell Gurney. On April 11, 1867, the subject of female suffrage

was first discussed in the House of Commons without being greeted with a

laugh. A petition presented by Mr. Duncan Maclaren, from Edinburgh, was

signed by eight university professors, six doctors of law, eighteen

clergymen, eight barristers, ten physicians, ten officers, and two

thousand other persons. Two women are said to have been lately elected

parish overseers: Mrs. Slocomb for Brittadon, and Mrs. Craig for Bratton

Fleming. The step-daughter of John Stuart Mill, Miss Helen Taylor,

contributed to the January number of the "Westminster" an article which

worthily sustained the far more comprehensive statement of her mother in

1851. It would be difficult to imagine a paper, however, that would

appeal more forcibly to the English people. There is in England a

Woman-Suffrage Association, which proposes to circulate that article as

a tract. Mrs. P.A. Taylor and Frances Power Cobbe are among its most

active members. Mrs. Bodichon has recently brought out two pamphlets on

this subject. They contain one instance, which is not familiar, of the

inconvenience of withholding the franchise from English women. Owners of

estates seek to further their own interest through the voting power of

their tenantry, and frequently eject women from farms, to replace them

by men who have a freehold. On one Suffolk farm, seven women have been

ejected. Among the instances which Mrs. Bodichon adduces to show the

need of female votes are the neglect of female education; the refusal of

leases, or the ejection of old tenants; the want of proper public

spirit, which women might be expected to infuse into affairs; and the

condition of workhouses, and charitable appropriations in general. In

Austria, information furnished to one of Mrs. Bodichon's papers seems to

show that the women have the same electoral rights as men, only that in

a few cases they are compelled to vote by proxy. They vote as nobles, in

their corporate capacity as nuns, and as tax-payers or merchants; but I

need not say that there is much uncertainty in the Austrian

administration of such a law.

In connection with the name of Fredrika Bremer, I have mentioned the

great changes in Swedish law, mainly due to her influence. An indirect

right of suffrage was further granted to women in 1862; but in December,

1865, the Reform Bill gave the election of members of the Upper Chamber

to municipal and county bodies. In the election of these bodies, women

take part. They must be unmarried or widows, be twenty-five years old,

and have more than four hundred rixdollars per annum.

Article 15 of the Italian electoral law provides "that the taxation paid

by a widow, or by a wife separated from her husband, shall give a vote

to whichever of her children or near relatives she may select."

A curious petition has been lately presented to the Hungarian Diet. It

is signed by a number of widows and other women who are landed

proprietors, and asks for them the same equality of political rights

with the male inhabitants of the country, as they possessed in 1848.

These ladies represent that they have much more difficulty in bringing

up their children, and attending to the estates, than men; that they

have to bear the same State burdens; that they are not allowed to take

part in the communal elections; and that, although many of them possess

much more ground than the male electors, they have no political rights.

In 1848, these women were, for the first time, excluded from the

franchise.

The College, the Market, and the Court or, Woman's relation to education, labor and law · 第 145 / 150 题