FOOTNOTES:

[11] "Now that we can produce artificially, and from waste and even

noisome materials, the ethereal liquids to which the fragrance of the

pear, the pineapple, and the melon are due, and can manufacture

spirits of wine from coal-gas and oil of vitriol, we can scarcely be

over-sanguine as to what we shall yet effect as competitors with

living organisms in the production of certain compounds."--GEORGE

WILSON'S _Life of Forbes_, p. 129.

[12] What I mean here will be understood by a reference to Emile

Souvestre's "Philosophe sous les Toits." In a pretty story of two

women employed in a clasp-factory, he speaks of their low wages, and

says, that, having worked for thirty years, they had seen ten masters

grow wealthy and retire from business, without having changed, in any

degree, their own position.

These claspmakers certainly supported these ten masters and their

families in ease; and, wonderful to relate, these two did not fall.

An angel, clothed in white, sat on the sepulchre wherein their hopes

were buried, all through that thirty years.

[13] This may strike some readers like the hardihood of willing vice;

but it is only callousness, born of exposure to hopeless cold and

hunger.

[14] When a woman wishes to get slop-work, she must find some friend,

who will either deposit, or become responsible for, a sum equal to the

value of the work she is permitted to carry home. This person is

called her "security." The longer she works, the lower she falls; and,

on the death of the "security," it is often impossible to replace him.

The custom does not seem to be _general_ in this country.

[15] Those who are unaccustomed to this class of women will be

inclined to think that the state of things represented in the text has

long passed away. People who know nothing of the value of money talk a

great deal about "increase of wages," and are apt to say that any

honest woman can now get a living. Women's wages are at this moment of

less value than they were before the war; and, to confirm the

foregoing statements, I add here the statements of my friend Mrs.

Corbin, which reach me as I go to press:--

"At a meeting of the Liberal Christian League, held at Rev. Robert

Collyer's church, on Sunday evening, Feb. 3, a report was read by the

Chairman of the Committee on Friendless Women, from which the

following is an extract:--

Your Committee aimed [in visiting houses of ill-fame], in Chicago,

to find out, as nearly as possible, the general facts concerning

the lives of this class of women.

It was found that these women of pleasure, as they are called,

instead of leading the idle and luxurious life which many imagine,

are, in fact, the most steadily employed of any class in the

community, and have the least available leisure. Your Committee

have never yet visited a house of this kind, staying on the average

half an hour, but they have found male visitors, either there when

they entered, or coming in before they left; and this in the open

day. Inquiries put to the women concerning their hours of leisure

developed incidentally the fact, that it is only at certain times,

on certain days, that they can get out; and then it must be

strictly in the prosecution of their calling. The terms on which

these women are kept, are usually a certain stipulated sum per week

for room rent, and, over and above this, the half of their

earnings; which makes it necessary for the keepers to have a

constant eye upon the girls, to prevent their taking money outside.

The number of men supporting these houses is, moreover, so much

greater than the number of women supported therein, that every girl

is kept in constant requisition, either at the house, or as a

walking advertisement on the street and at public places.

Your Committee, before making these visits, were constantly assured

that these women preferred this way of life, and would scout the

efforts of their own sex at reforming them. Your Committee take

great pleasure in reporting, that, in every instance, they have

found this charge _utterly unsustained_. Everywhere doors were

freely opened to them; they were treated with as much politeness

and cordiality as they have ever received in the most respectable

houses; and the conversation was of the freest and most

satisfactory character.

'Are you happy in this life?' was asked of a delicate girl in her

teens, who had been seen, five minutes before, dancing and singing

about a man in an adjoining apartment in the most wanton

manner,--'Are you happy in this life?'

Tears, sudden and sincere, with a look of indignant protest, filled

her eyes, as she answered,--

'Think how we have to treat the men: that of itself is enough to

prevent _any woman_ from being happy.'

'But you do not always talk this way to men?' was the reply.

'Oh, no!' she said; 'I would never tell a _man_ that. We always

tell the men that we like this life, and would not live any other,

if we could; but _women know_.'

Another voluntarily mentioned the intemperance with which they are

universally and justly charged, as one of the hard necessities of

their position. Women ought not to drink, she admitted; but they

would die if they did not, or go mad with anguish and despair.

Your Committee feel, that, at the present stage of investigation,

it may seem premature to speak of the causes of this terrible evil;

this slavery, which their observation assures them is more

degrading and horrible than any other upon the face of the earth:

but two causes have met them so constantly face to face, that they

cannot in justice refrain from mentioning them.

The first is the terribly prevalent and everywhere tolerated

licentiousness of men. Your Committee believe it to be an admitted

fact, that, if to-day every woman of abandoned life could suddenly

be removed from the dens of this city and placed in a respectable

position, it would not be six months before their places would be

filled, from the ranks of women who are now virtuous; and they have

no faith in any system of reform which does not strike effectual

blows at this, the mainspring of the evil.

Over against this, the first great pillar of the institution,

stands the almost equally colossal one of poverty, and the

exclusion of women from the ordinary fields of labor.

'Here is what I work for,' said a fine, strong-looking woman, as

she placed her hand on the head of a bright boy of two years. 'He

is my child. I have him to support. There is no other way in which

I could earn a comfortable subsistence for myself and him.'

Another, the keeper of a house of ill-fame, an intelligent,

graceful, refined-looking woman,--a woman who would have been an

ornament to any society,--said:--

'I was left suddenly poor, with my mother to support. I had never

been used to work, and there seemed no work I could do that would

support us both. The circumstances of my life seemed to force me

into this way of living;' which meant, of course, that some man

stood ready to offer her kindness, protection, support, every thing

but marriage, and she accepted it. 'My mother, to-day, is as

innocent of any knowledge of my way of life, as a saint in heaven.

I live in daily terror and solicitude lest she should find it out,

for it would kill her. I am going soon on a visit to her, and shall

carry with me twelve hundred and fifty dollars, with which to

secure her a home for life; so that, whatever happens to me, she

will be provided for.'

In confirmation of this story, a hack came to the door while she

was speaking, to carry her to the train she had previously

indicated; which fact, together with her earnest and sincere

manner, left no doubt in the minds of your Committee concerning the

truthfulness of her story.

In regard to the series of meetings proposed to be inaugurated,

your Committee are obliged for the present to report unfavorably,

for the following reasons:--

The proposition was everywhere cordially met among the women. They

readily agreed to the usefulness of the project, and mentioned only

one objection, and that to time. 'Sunday,' was the invariable

answer, 'is our busiest day. We could hardly get away at all on

that day; but we will try to do so.' Your Committee saw at once the

blunder they had made in forgetting that Sunday is the leisure day

of men; and therefore went to the first appointed meeting, through

a cold and blinding snowstorm, with little hope of success. They

found the room already occupied by some six or eight street roughs,

evidently waiting for what might transpire. They left the room very

soon, but took their station about the door, and remained there as

long as the Committee did. Subsequent inquiries confirmed the

impression, that they were sent there by some of the men who had

been in the houses at the time of the visits, to break up the

meetings, for which purpose, of course, only their presence would

be necessary.

Beyond this determined opposition which would no doubt be

encountered at the hands of the male supporters of the institution,

your Committee see but one serious difficulty; and that is, the

deep-rooted scepticism which prevail among the women concerning any

general sentiment of Christian charity in their behalf. They have

so long been persecuted with unjust opprobrium, abandoned, outcast,

left to live or die as they might, without one word of pity or

encouragement, while the men who shared their sins, and were

oftentimes the guiltier partners, were the honored and trusted

associates of Christian women, pillars perhaps in Christian

churches, that they have naturally come to feel, that the sympathy

of one or two good women, however earnest and grateful it may be in

itself, will be of little avail against the malignity of the whole

banded world.

Still your Committee have seen nothing, so far, to discourage them

in their efforts, but every thing to impress upon them the feeling

of imperative duty in this direction.

(Signed) Mrs. C.F. CORBIN, Chairman.

"The plan of action proposed by this Committee was to visit the women

in a friendly, Christ-like spirit, inaugurate a series of meetings

among them, organize efforts in the direction of saving their money,

so that they might be able to take an independent position, with only

such moral support as should be necessary to enable them to face the

opposition of the world, and to direct their lavish free-heartedness

into channels of benevolence toward the old and worn-out of their

number. Pure and healthful pleasures would also be provided for them,

good music, the reading of fine poems and interesting stories, and so

a beginning made toward introducing principles of steadiness and

sobriety into their now totally abandoned and desperate lives."

[16] This expression, used in all such places to denote the food, tea,

coffee, or gin, used by the overstrained girls, is terribly

significant.

[17] I do not know that any person has ever practically carried out

Legouvé's estimate of labor as a moral help, but Marie de Lamourous,

the foundress of the House of Mercy at Bourdeaux. This was a refuge

for ruined women, whom she trained to self-support. Some one offered

her a sum sufficient to insure her family a comfortable living; but

she wisely refused it. "No false pretences," she said: "if we are not

compelled to labor, we shall not labor. An idle mind makes its own

temptations. I can do nothing without work."

[18] When woman's power to work is called in question, men almost

always remark, that she has shown no _inventive_ genius whatever.

Should a proper history of the arts ever be written, this will be

found to be an entire mistake. Patentees are not always inventors; and

many of these, after hopeless labor carried on for years, have owed a

final success to some woman's power of adaptation. We need not,

however, take refuge in general statement, nor in the traditional fact

that she invented spindle, distaff, needle, and scissors. Any new-born

barbarian, pressed by necessity, might accomplish so much. The most

delicate and beautiful obstetrical instruments were invented by Madame

Boivin. Madame Ducoudray invented the manikin; Madame Breton, the

system of artificial nourishment for babes; Morandi and Bihéron

adapted wax to the purposes of medical illustration; and it was to the

observations of Mademoiselle Bihéron, recorded in wax, that Dr. Hunter

owed the illustrations of his best work. He was her generous friend;

but she preceded him seven years in this direction, and may possibly

have given him the right to use her observations as his own. Madame

Rondet has, in the present century, invented a tube to be used in

cases of restoration from asphyxia. It is easy to quote these cases

from the history of medicine, because an honest French physician has

taken pains to preserve them; but the following instances of inventive

and mechanical power may be less known:--

In 1823, _the first patent of invention_ was taken out in Paris by

Madame Dutillet, for the formation of artificial marble. This was so

successful a patent, that she sold it in 1824; and the purchaser

renewed it, with still further improvements.

In 1836, Burrows, an Englishman, took out a patent for cement. Madame

Bex, of Paris, found this cement a failure in damp places, and

published a method of less limited application, in which bitumen was

employed.

In 1840, Mrs. Marshall, once of Manchester, England, and now of

Edinburgh, was struck with the idea, that the electric forces evolved

by decaying animal and vegetable matter, acting upon calcareous

substances, must have much to do with the natural formation of marble.

In five years, by upwards of ten thousand experiments, she perfected

an artificial marble, whose constituents and manufacture were entirely

within control, and which could be made in hours or months, at the

maker's volition. To this cement she gave the simple Italian name of

_intonuca_. It is singular that she should so intuitively have seized

this secret; for, under Madame Dutillet's patent, we are expressly

informed that all vegetable matter must be removed from the

composition, if we would have the cement indestructible. The example

is an interesting one; for the ten thousand disagreeable experiments

show that one woman at least possessed the power of persistent

application, of long-protracted labor, so often denied.

Starch first came into use in England in 1564. It was carried thither

by a Mrs. Dinghen Vanden Plasse, of Flanders, who set up business as a

professed starcher, and instructed others how to use the article for

five pounds, and how to make it for twenty pounds.

Side-saddles for ladies first came into use in 1138. Anne, queen of

Richard II., introduced these to the English ladies.

The braiding of straw in this country was first begun in Providence,

in 1798, by Mrs. Betsey Baker, lately residing in Dedham, Mass. The

first bonnet she made was of seven straws with bobbin let in like

open-work, and lined with pink satin.

I had hoped to add to these names that of a peasant woman, who

successfully drained a large estate in France after her own original

fashion, and was sent from Paris to do the same in French Guiana for

the government; but, although no phantom, she eludes my researches.

[19] Historical Pictures of the Middle Ages, in Black and White.

[20] Ernest Legouvé.

[21] While these papers were preparing for the press, the record of

another such sale, in August, 1859, disgraced the English nation.

Opposite the brewery, at Dudley, in Staffordshire, not many miles from

Kidderminster and Birmingham, a man named Pensotte sold his wife, with

a halter round her neck, for sixpence. He had previously dragged

her--a three weeks' bride--three quarters of a mile in this state. It

is intimated in this case, that she was not faithful; but it is the

first time I ever saw such a charge attached to such an account.

Americans are anxious to understand this outrage. Is it possible that

a government which forbids the sale of a negro cannot forbid the sale

of a Saxon wife? What shadow of law sustains the custom? Is the woman

supposed to be sold into wifehood or servitude? I have taken it for

granted that the word "mare" shows that she is regarded as a beast of

burden. It is impossible for the fairest and loftiest woman in

England--nay, for Victoria herself--not to suffer, in some degree,

from the public opinion which such transactions, ever so rarely

occurring, tend to form.

The College, the Market, and the Court or, Woman's relation to education, labor and law · 第 68 / 150 题