CHAPTER I

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE

Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.

Bold text is denoted by =equal signs=.

Footnote anchors are denoted by [number], and the footnotes have

been placed at the end of the book.

A superscript is denoted by ^x or ^{xx}, for example Estab^t.

The Appendix had several passages marked with a vertical bar in the

margin, indicating that the passages so marked were omitted from the

published dispatches in 1900. In this etext these passages are

enclosed in double parentheses {{ ... }} and are also indented if

the passage is in a separate paragraph.

Some minor changes to the text are noted at the end of the book.

[Illustration: _From a photograph by A. Bassano_]

[Illustration: Signature of Sir Charles Warren]

SIR CHARLES WARREN

AND

SPION KOP

SIR CHARLES WARREN

AND

SPION KOP

A VINDICATION

BY

‘DEFENDER’

WITH A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH, PORTRAIT AND MAP

LONDON

SMITH, ELDER, & CO., 15 WATERLOO PLACE

1902

[All rights reserved]

PREFACE

It is now more than two years since the operation took place on

the Tugela River in Natal, that ended in the capture and the

unwarrantable abandonment the same day of the position of Spion Kop.

The lapse of time since these events occurred naturally caused a

loss of interest in this chapter of the history of the war in South

Africa; but the recent publication of portions of the despatches

omitted in the ‘Gazette’ of 1900, and also of other documents

received at the time by the War Office but not disclosed, has again

brought the subject into prominence, revived public interest in it,

and offered an opportunity which we gladly seize to vindicate the

conduct of an officer who has been condemned without being heard.

Whether Sir Charles Warren will be allowed any opportunity of

defending himself against the strictures passed upon him by Sir

Redvers Buller, either now or when the war is over, is doubtful; but

at length, having before us all the documents received at the War

Office, it is proposed to show in the following pages that, in spite

of the difficult circumstances in which he found himself, Sir Charles

Warren did his duty, and that, had Spion Kop not been recklessly

abandoned by a subordinate, there is every reason to suppose that he

would have gained a great success.

The publication of the despatches on Spion Kop in the parliamentary

Easter recess of 1900 took the world by surprise--so much so, indeed,

that a story was current that it was due to the mistake of a War

Office clerk. It did not commend itself as either a useful or a

desirable proceeding to publish to the whole world the strictures

passed by the General in command in Natal upon his second-in-command,

and those of the Commander-in-Chief in South Africa upon both,

especially as those officers were still serving their country in the

field.

The political mistake made by the Government was speedily

demonstrated by the debates that took place on the reassembling

of Parliament; but it now appears that a greater want of judgment

was shown than was then supposed, and that having decided, however

wrongly, to publish the despatches the Government would have

done better to have published them in full. And this for several

reasons--it would have made little difference to those censured,

would have enabled the public to understand the Spion Kop operations,

which could not be understood from the incomplete documents, and

would have prevented a distinguished officer lying for two years

under the shadow of unjust accusations.

Much capital was made by the Opposition in Parliament out of the

suggestion of the Secretary of State for War that Sir Redvers Buller

should rewrite his despatch, or rather should write a separate

despatch for publication; but any one who has tried to get to the

bottom of the business from the material available must have felt

that Lord Lansdowne was perfectly right in suggesting that what was

wanted was a simple statement from Sir Redvers Buller of what he

intended to do, and how it was done or not done. Instead of this

there were despatches giving formal cover to other despatches from

Sir Charles Warren, and then criticising that officer’s actions

unfavourably. No statement was to be found anywhere indicating what

Sir Redvers Buller had intended to do, and as the instructions he

issued were not published, the operation which Sir Charles Warren

was directed to execute could only be gathered from the references

he made to them in his reports. These reports were evidently written

to his chief in the belief that the General commanding would write a

full account of what he had proposed to do, and how far his orders

had been successfully carried out, or otherwise.

To most men, conscientiously compelled to censure in an official

despatch those employed under them, the suggestion from the War

Office that such censure should be confined to a confidential

communication, and that some account of the operation and the cause

of failure should be written for publication, would have come as a

welcome relief; and had Sir Redvers Buller seen his way to comply

with it and at the same time to send copies to Sir Charles Warren

of the confidential despatches, he would have placed himself in an

unassailable position, he would have given Sir Charles Warren an

opportunity of confidentially justifying himself, if he could do so,

to the Secretary of State for War and the Commander-in-Chief, he

would have enabled his countrymen to know more about the operations

than was otherwise possible, and the world would have been spared a

very painful exhibition.

To this course, however, Sir Redvers Buller would not consent. He

prided himself on his integrity in resisting such a proposal, and has

been much praised for refusing to write a despatch for publication,

having already written one, which was mainly an indictment of his

second-in-command, on whom he threw the responsibility for the

failure of the operations.

It is the custom of the Service--and a very fair and proper custom

it is--that an unfavourable confidential report made upon a junior

officer by his superior shall be communicated to him before it

is sent forward, so that he may have an opportunity either of

excusing himself or of amending his conduct, and may have no

reason to complain that advantage has been taken of a confidential

communication to make unfavourable reports behind his back, of which

he remains in ignorance.

Sir Redvers Buller does not appear to have been mindful of this

custom, when, instead of writing a simple account of what he proposed

to do, and how it failed of accomplishment, he used the opportunity

to criticise most unfavourably the conduct of the distinguished

officer, his second-in-command, still serving under him in face of

the enemy, and left him in complete ignorance of the accusations made

against him. This ignorance he knew must last in any case until the

despatches were published, and, if they were not published, would

never be removed. But Sir Redvers Buller went beyond this, for he

attached to his despatch a separate memorandum, ‘not necessarily for

publication,’ in which he reiterated his complaints of the conduct of

Sir Charles Warren and accused him of such incapacity as unfitted him

for independent command. But not a word of this reached Sir Charles

Warren, whose exertions in the field during the succeeding month

under Sir Redvers Buller contributed so greatly to the victory of

Pieters and the relief of Ladysmith; and it was not until he saw the

despatches in the newspapers, long after this campaign was over, that

he knew of the secret stab his reputation had received at the hand

of his commander. Two years later the recently published omissions

have informed him how seriously the attack upon his reputation as a

soldier was intended.

A correspondence between Mr. Henry Norman, M.P., and the Right Hon.

A. J. Balfour, First Lord of the Treasury, published on 21st February

last, contains some observations by the latter very much to the

point on the want of any narrative of the Spion Kop operations in

Sir Redvers Buller’s despatches. Mr. Balfour points out, as was done

two years before in the parliamentary debates, that the General in

command, ‘in accordance with the Queen’s Regulations, with the best

precedents, and with public convenience,’ should have furnished a

simple narrative, unencumbered by controversy, of the operations

which took place. To this Sir Redvers Buller objected, in a letter

published on the 26th March last, that he was not in command, that

he was not present, and that therefore it was not his duty to write

such a narrative. The reply of Mr. Balfour, from which an extract is

appended, will be found to be fully borne out in the pages of this

book.

Extract from a letter from Mr. A. J. Balfour to Sir Redvers Buller

dated 10th March 1902.

* * * * *

‘You say that, not being in chief command, you were not the proper

person to write an account of what took place. But can this be

sustained? I find that on 15th January you ordered Sir Charles

Warren to cross the Tugela to the west of Spion Kop; on the 21st

and 22nd you gave him personal instructions as to the disposal

of his artillery; on the latter day you agreed with him, after

discussion, that Spion Kop would have to be taken; on the 23rd you

definitely decided upon the attack; you selected the officer who

was to lead it, detailing one of your Staff to accompany him; it

was by your orders that on the 24th Lieut.-Colonel Thorneycroft

assumed command on the summit of Spion Kop after General Woodgate

was wounded, and all heliographic messages between the officers in

the fighting line and Sir Charles Warren passed through your camp,

and were seen by you before they reached their destination. As

you were thus in constant touch with the troops actually engaged

on the top of the hill, so also you kept general control over the

movements of the co-operative forces under General Lyttelton,

with whom you were in communication during both the morning and

the afternoon of the 24th. It is, of course, true that you were

not present at the actual Spion Kop engagement. But if this was a

reason for not writing an account of it, it was a reason equally

applicable to Sir Charles Warren, whose headquarters, as I am

informed, were very little nearer to the scene of action than

were your own. It was on these grounds that I did not draw any

distinction between your position during the days of Spion Kop and

that of any other general conducting operations over an extended

field, at every part of which he could not, from the nature of the

case, be present. You were responsible for the general plan of

action; you intervened frequently in its execution; you were not

prevented either by distance or any other material obstacle from

intervening more frequently still, had you deemed it expedient

to do so. Was I wrong, then, in pointing out that it would have

been in accordance both with precedent and the Queen’s Regulations

for you to have supplied the Commander-in-Chief with a narrative

of these important military events based on your own observations

and on the reports of those of your officers who were immediately

engaged with the enemy?’

* * * * *

We have never been able to understand why the orders given to Sir

Charles Warren were not published with the despatches two years

ago. True they were called secret instructions, but of course the

secrecy was a temporary matter, and they ceased to be secret when the

operations were over. Without them there was no way for the public to

learn officially, except in the most general way, what the General in

command in Natal desired to do, and probably, owing to the wording of

Lord Roberts’s despatch, a misconception arose, widely entertained in

the army and highly prejudicial to Sir Charles Warren.

This misconception was that Sir Redvers Buller instructed Sir Charles

Warren to make his turning movement by way of Acton Homes, instead

of which Warren obstinately preferred the route by Groote Hoek. It

was supposed that by the first of these two routes the force might

have marched a long way round, but would have got into Ladysmith

with little difficulty, whereas the (hypothetical) substitution

by Warren of the Groote Hoek road had necessitated the capture of

Spion Kop. The publication of the instructions upsets this theory.

The Acton Homes road is never mentioned. The only references to the

direction of the turning movement are vague--‘to the West of Spion

Kop’--‘acting as circumstances require’--‘refusing your right and

throwing your left forward’--and it now appears that Sir Redvers

Buller intended Warren to go by the Groote Hoek route.

In vain has the Government endeavoured to shield the military

reputation of Sir Redvers Buller at the expense of others. He has

been consistent in his efforts to get the despatches published in

full, even to the memorandum ‘not necessarily for publication’--a

severe condemnation of Sir Charles Warren’s incapacity, but a more

damning one of his own--and by his attitude has compelled the

Government to give way. How truly applicable is an epigram of Mr.

Henry Sidgwick, quoted by Sir Henry Howarth in a recent letter to the

‘Morning Post’: ‘The darkest shadows in life are those which a man

makes when he stands in his own light.’

In addition to the official documents on the subject of Spion Kop

much information of a very varied character has accumulated during

the last two years, and besides invaluable verbal observations and

descriptions gathered from conversation with officers from the front

who took part in the operations, there is a whole library of books by

newspaper correspondents, officers, and others, which bear upon these

operations and throw light upon much that is obscure in the official

papers. Among many others may be mentioned ‘My Diocese during the

War,’ by Bishop Baynes of Natal; ‘The Relief of Ladysmith,’ by Mr.

J. B. Atkins; ‘The Natal Campaign,’ by Mr. Bennet Burleigh; ‘London

to Ladysmith via Pretoria,’ by Mr. Winston Churchill, M.P.; ‘The

History of the War in South Africa,’ by Dr. Conan Doyle; ‘The Relief

of Ladysmith,’ by Captain Holmes Wilson; ‘Buller’s Campaign: With the

Natal Field Force of 1900,’ by Lieutenant E. Blake Knox, Royal Army

Medical Corps.

Magazine articles have also appeared from time to time, some

commenting on the operations themselves, others filling up gaps in

the narrative, and others again incidentally referring to facts in

connection with the operations. Among these last may be mentioned:

(1) A series of articles contributed by Sir Charles Warren himself to

the ‘National Review’ entitled ‘Some Lessons from the South African

War’; (2) Mr. Oppenheim’s defence of Lieut.-Colonel Thorneycroft in

the ‘Nineteenth Century’; (3) An instructive diary of Dr. Raymond

Maxwell, who was serving with the Boers, in the ‘Contemporary Review’

for December 1901; and (4) ‘The Diary of a Boer Officer,’ by another

of them, in the ‘United Service Magazine’ for February this year.

Some reference should perhaps be made to one of a series of articles

in ‘Blackwood’s Magazine’ by ‘Linesman,’ which was headed ‘Dies Iræ,’

and dealt with Spion Kop, because these articles have attracted a

good deal of attention, are cleverly written, and have since been

republished in book form. They do not, however, impress the military

reader as very accurate descriptions, but rather as war pictures,

in which the colour is laid on with no sparing hand to obtain

the highest effect, the aim being to please the sensation-loving

reader. The value of the account of Spion Kop given in ‘Blackwood’

is discounted by ‘Linesman’ himself, who, having told us that ‘what

the writer saw of the fight on the summit of Spion Kop was little

enough’; that he had learnt ‘to describe--nay, believe nothing that

one has not seen with one’s own eyes’; and that, ‘if the tongue is

an unruly member, much more so is the ear’; nevertheless proceeds to

describe in blood-curdling language what he did not see with his own

eyes, and must have heard with ‘unruly’ ears.

The general result of all the information is to make it clear that

Spion Kop was the key of the position dominating the country,

and that the holders of it opened the way to Ladysmith; that no

one was more astonished at its unauthorised abandonment than Sir

Charles Warren, except the Boers themselves, who refused to credit

the evidence of their senses, and at first believed its forsaken

condition to be a trap! No longer, indeed, is it possible to

regard the unwarrantable surrender of this position as a fortunate

accident preventing an actual and impending disaster on the morrow,

or, as Lieut.-Colonel Thorneycroft is reported to have said, ‘a

mop up in the morning.’ Rather its abandonment was the blundering

relinquishment of a hardly won and well assured success, only to be

compared with the fatuous withdrawal in the morning of the storming

parties which made the brilliant night attack and surprised the

fortress of Bergen op Zoom on 8th March 1814.

CONTENTS

CHAP. PAGE

PREFACE v

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH 1

I. BEGINNING OF THE WAR--WARREN CROSSES THE TUGELA 55

II. POSITION OF AFFAIRS 75

III. ADVANCE TO VENTER’S LAAGER AND ATTACK OF THE

RANGEWORTHY HILLS 92

IV. BOER DEMORALISATION--TACTICAL IMPORTANCE OF

SPION KOP 119

V. CAPTURE OF SPION KOP AND ITS ABANDONMENT 135

VI. AFTER WITHDRAWAL--BOER COMMENTS 159

VII. SOME CRITICISMS 169

APPENDIX: EXTRACTS FROM DESPATCHES 203

SIR CHARLES WARREN

AND

SPION KOP

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

A short sketch of the career of Sir Charles Warren is an appropriate

introduction to his appearance in South Africa as the leader of the

5th Division of the army in the Natal campaign, and as the Commander

of the Field Force in the operations on the Tugela between 15th and

25th January 1900.

PARENTAGE

Lieut.-General Sir Charles Warren, G.C.M.G., K.C.B., F.R.S., is the

son of the late Major-General Sir Charles Warren, K.C.B., Colonel of

the 96th Foot, by his first wife, Mary Anne, daughter of William

Hughes, Esq., of Dublin and Carlow, and grandson of the Very Rev.

John Warren, Dean of Bangor, North Wales.

His father served under the Duke of Wellington in the march to Paris

after the battle of Waterloo, in India, and in South Africa, and the

notes and sketches he there made upon expeditions into the interior

were made use of by his son fifty years later, when reporting on

the Bechuana and Griqua territories in 1876. He saw active service

during a second tour in India, in China, and in the Crimean war,

and was several times wounded. He retired after holding the command

of the Infantry Brigade at Malta for five years, and was created a

Knight Commander of the Bath. He had a natural turn for science,

mathematics, and adventure, which, together with his love of

soldiering, was inherited by his son Charles.

EARLY SERVICE--GIBRALTAR AND CHATHAM

Lieut.-General Sir Charles Warren was born at Bangor, North Wales,

on 7th February 1840. His early education took place at the Grammar

Schools of Bridgnorth and Wem, and at Cheltenham College. He then

entered the Royal Military College at Sandhurst, and from that

passed through the Royal Military Academy at Woolwich and received

a commission as lieutenant in the Royal Engineers on 23rd December

1857. After the usual course of professional instruction at Chatham,

Warren went to Gibraltar, where he spent seven years, and, in

addition to the ordinary duties of an Engineer subaltern--looking

after his men and constructing or improving fortifications and

barrack buildings--he was employed on a trigonometrical survey of

the Rock, which he completed on a large scale. He constructed two

models of the famous fortress, one of which is now at the Rotunda

at Woolwich, and the other at Gibraltar. He was also engaged for

some months in rendering the eastern face of the Rock inaccessible

by scarping or building up any places that might lend a foothold to

an enemy. He was selected in 1865 to assist Professor Ramsay in a

geological survey of Gibraltar, but it fell through. While at this

station he invented a fitment to gun carriages to supersede the truck

levers of the Service; an invention objected to at the time because

it was made of iron, but subsequently adopted into the Service.

In 1864 Lieut. Warren married Fanny Margaretta Haydon, a daughter

of the late Samuel Haydon, Esq., of Guildford. On the completion of

his term of service at Gibraltar he returned to England in 1865, was

appointed Assistant Instructor in Surveying at the School of Military

Engineering at Chatham, and a year later his services were lent by

the War Office to the Palestine Exploration Fund.

JERUSALEM, 1867 TO 1870

The object of the Palestine Exploration Fund was the illustration

of the Bible, and it originated mainly through the exertions of Sir

George Grove, who formed an influential committee, of which for a

long time Sir Walter Besant was secretary. Captain (afterwards Sir)

Charles Wilson and Lieut. Anderson, R.E., had already been at work on

the survey of Palestine, and, in 1867, it was decided to undertake

excavations at Jerusalem to elucidate, if possible, many doubtful

questions of Biblical archæology, such as the site of the Holy

Sepulchre, the true direction of the second wall and the course of

the first, second, and third walls, involving the sites of the towers

of Hippicus, Phasælus, Mariamne, and Psephinus, and many other points

of great interest to the Biblical student.

The task was entrusted to Lieut. Warren, who was assisted by

non-commissioned officers of Royal Engineers. The difficulties in the

way of carrying it out were great--obstruction on the part of the

Pashas, physical dangers, and want of money. As regards the first,

only great tact and firmness prevented the complete suspension of the

work. ‘Indeed,’ says Major-General Whitworth Porter in his ‘History

of the Corps of Royal Engineers,’ ‘the Vizierial letter, under which

the party was supposed to be acting, expressly forbade excavations

at the Noble Sanctuary and the various Moslem and Christian shrines.

How, in spite of this, Warren succeeded in his object is well told in

his “Underground Jerusalem.”’

With regard to physical danger Dean Stanley wrote: ‘In the plain

and unadorned narrative of Captain Warren,[1] the difficulties and

dangers of the undertaking might almost escape notice. Yet the

perils will appear sufficiently great to any one who draws out from

the good-humoured story the fact that these excavations were carried

on at the constant risk of life and limb to the bold explorers. The

whole series of their progress was a succession of “lucky escapes.”

Huge stones were day after day ready to fall, and sometimes did fall,

on their heads. One of the explorers was “injured so severely that he

could barely crawl out into the open air”; another extricated himself

with difficulty, torn and bleeding, while another was actually

buried under the ruins. Sometimes they were almost suffocated by the

stifling heat; at other times they were plunged for hours up to their

necks in the freezing waters of some subterranean torrent; sometimes

blocked up by a falling mass without light or escape.’

The third difficulty was want of money; for when Warren left

London he carried off all the money of the Fund (300_l._) for the

expenses of the party, the Committee hoping that, as the excavations

proceeded, public interest would be shown by a flow of subscriptions.

The Committee said: ‘Give us results and you can have money.’ Warren

replied: ‘No money, no results.’ In fact, however, he had at one time

advanced no less than 1,000_l._ out of his own resources.

The work went on for some three years with occasional interruptions.

Warren returned home in 1870, and spent the following year in

preparing the results of his work for the Committee of the Fund and

for the Press.

Sir Walter Besant, in his ‘Twenty-one Years’ Work in the Holy Land,’

writes:

‘It is impossible here to do more than to recapitulate the

principal results of the excavations, which are without parallel

for the difficulties presented and the courage displayed in

overcoming them.... It is certain that nothing will ever be done

in the future to compare with what was done by Warren.... It was

Warren who restored the ancient city to the world; he it was who

stripped the rubbish from the rocks and showed the glorious temple

standing within its walls 1,000 feet long, and 200 feet high, of

mighty masonry: he it was who laid open the valleys now covered

up and hidden; he who opened the secret passages, the ancient

aqueducts, the bridge connecting the temple and the town. Whatever

else may be done in the future, his name will always be associated

with the Holy City which he first recovered.’

So much was this the case that for a long time he was known as

‘Jerusalem Warren.’

In addition to ‘Underground Jerusalem’ he wrote ‘The Temple or the

Tomb.’

What high value was placed upon Captain Warren’s services by the

Administration of the Fund may be gathered from the following

quotation from ‘Our Work in Palestine,’ published by Bentley & Son in

1875, a book which had then reached its eighth thousand:--

‘Let us finally bear witness to the untiring perseverance, courage,

and ability of Captain Warren. Those of us who know best under what

difficulties he had to work can tell with what courage and patience

they were met and overcome. Physical suffering and long endurance

of heat, cold, and danger were nothing. There were besides

anxieties of digging in the dark, anxieties as to local prejudice,

anxieties for the lives of brave men--Sergeant Birtles and the

rest of his Staff--anxieties which we may not speak of here. He

has his reward, it is true. So long as an interest in the modern

history of Jerusalem remains, so long as people are concerned to

know how sacred sites have been found out, so long will the name of

Captain Warren survive.’

DOVER, SHOEBURYNESS, AND THE ORDNANCE FACTORIES, 1871 TO 1876

In 1871 Warren returned to military duty, and was posted to Dover

in command of the 10th Company of Royal Engineers, and for the next

year was employed on the fortifications of the fortress, principally

at Dover Castle and Castle Hill and Fort (Fort Burgoyne). He was

then transferred, in 1872, to the School of Gunnery at Shoeburyness,

where he remained for three years, and was very successful in his

administration of the Engineer duties in regard both to the barracks

and the experiments with big guns and iron plates carried out by the

Ordnance Committee. He had also Engineer charge of the gunpowder

magazine at Purfleet.

On his departure, in 1875, to take Engineer charge of the Gunpowder

and Small-arm Factories at Waltham Abbey and Enfield, he received the

highest commendation from the Commandant of the School of Gunnery,

who wrote to the War Office that Captain Warren’s professional

reputation as a highly instructed and accomplished officer was so

well established that it was unnecessary to refer to it, beyond

stating that the station had benefited largely by his administration

in carrying out the important duties entrusted to him, and that he

placed on record not only the support and assistance received from

him in all official matters, but that his social relations with the

Commandant and all other officers of the establishment rendered his

departure a subject of sincere regret to all.

He was a candidate in 1876 for the secretaryship of the Royal

Engineers’ Institute, when Colonel (afterwards Sir) Peter Scratchley

observed in his recommendation: ‘Captain Warren has been under my

command for four and a half years, and is, in my opinion, a most

able, conscientious, indefatigable officer, and one who would do

credit to the Corps wherever employed. His literary tastes, general

experience, and qualifications particularly fit him for the

appointment he is desirous of obtaining.’

Although unsuccessful his services were to be utilised in a wider

sphere than his own Corps.

In October 1876 he was asked by the Colonial Office to undertake

the duty of laying down the boundary line between Griqualand West

and the Orange Free State, and his services were at once lent by

the War Department. On leaving England he received a letter from

Lord Carnarvon’s private secretary saying how much the Colony was to

be congratulated on having obtained his services, and another from

his late chief, Colonel Scratchley, regretting his departure and

expressing his belief that he ‘would never meet an abler officer or a

better fellow.’

SOUTH AFRICA, 1876 TO 1879

_Griqualand West and the Orange Free State Boundary_

The necessity for laying down a boundary line between Griqualand West

and the Orange Free State had arisen from the rival claims of the

Chief Waterboer of the Griquas and of President Brand of the Orange

Free State to the Diamond Fields. The British Government acquired the

rights of the Waterboer, and, after some protracted negotiations, it

was arranged that the Orange Free State should abandon its claim on

receiving from Griqualand West the sum of 90,000_l._ Mr. de Villiers

was the expert nominated by the Orange Free State to be associated

with Captain Warren in laying out the boundary.

Warren, with two non-commissioned officers of Royal Engineers,

arrived at Cape Town towards the end of November, and, after an

interview with the Governor, Sir Henry Barkly, proceeded to Port

Elizabeth by steamer, and thence by coach, via Graham’s Town and

Cradock, to Kimberley, where Major Owen Lanyon, the Administrator,

introduced him to his colleague, Mr. Joseph E. de Villiers,

Government Surveyor. After an interview with President Brand at

Bloemfontein he went into camp outside Kimberley towards the end of

December, measured his base, took observations, and elaborated his

general scheme of operations.

The heat was intense, the shade temperature being over 100°

Fahr. for hours together, the atmosphere was highly charged with

electricity, and the thunderstorms were often terrific, the lightning

playing all round the encampment or party, and the ground being

struck in all directions. Mosquitoes and flies were also a great

nuisance.

The work, however, proceeded satisfactorily and expeditiously, and

on 18th April 1877 was completed and ready for inspection. A party

composed of the two Commissioners and officials of the two States

formally inspected the line from the Vaal to the Orange River, 120

miles, and an official notification of the completion of the work

was made to the respective Governments. The plans were then drawn on

a scale of three miles to the inch and completed before 15th May.

Captain Warren was entertained by President Brand at Bloemfontein to

meet the Volksraad at dinner. Votes of thanks from the Legislatures

of Griqualand West and the Orange Free State were presented to each

of the Commissioners, the former illuminated and very handsomely got

up.

_Griqualand West Land Claims_

Sending his party home, Warren went to Kimberley, and thence to

Pretoria and the Gold Fields and on to Delagoa Bay, intending to

go to England by Zanzibar. An interesting account of this journey

appeared in ‘Good Words’ two years ago. From Delagoa Bay, however,

he was directed to return to Cape Town to see Sir Bartle Frere, and

on arrival there was appointed Special Commissioner in Griqualand

West for six months to investigate and arrange the various land cases

in appeal before the High Court of Griqualand West. This delicate

mission he accomplished with great ability, tact, and judgment,

settling 220 out of 240 cases to general satisfaction, except that

of the lawyers, and avoiding a great amount of litigation. He was

made a Companion of St. Michael and St. George for his work on the

boundary, and received a letter from H.R.H. the Duke of Cambridge,

Commander-in-Chief, expressing his great satisfaction at the

efficient manner in which he had performed the duties entrusted to

him of marking off the boundary between the Orange Free State and

Griqualand West, and also of the settlement of the land claims in the

latter province.

_Meeting with Mr. Cecil Rhodes_

It was on his way to Kimberley from Cape Town viâ Port Elizabeth

on this land claim business in Griqualand that he had the late Mr.

Cecil Rhodes as his travelling companion. As they were driving

over the brown veldt from Dordrecht to Jamestown, Warren noticed

that Mr. Rhodes, who sat opposite to him, was evidently engaged in

learning something by heart, and offered to hear him. It turned

out to be the Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England. In

the diary of this journey, also published in ‘Good Words’ of 1900,

Warren relates: ‘We got on very well until we arrived at the article

on predestination, and there we stuck. He had his views and I had

mine, and our fellow-passengers were greatly amused at the topic of

our conversation--for several hours--being on one subject. Rhodes

is going in for his degree at home, and works out here during the

vacation.’

_The Gaika War, 1878_

In January 1878 Warren proceeded to the Gaika war in command of the

Diamond Fields Horse, raised at Kimberley, and was engaged for six

months in Kaffraria. He bought his mounts and drilled his men on

the way, and infused his own indomitable energy into every member

of his command. He took part in numerous engagements, among which

may be mentioned the action of Perie Bush in March, when he was

injured by the falling of the bough of a tree, and the action at

Debe Nek on 5th April, where with seventy-five of the Diamond Fields

Horse he met 1,200 armed Kafirs of Seyolo’s tribe in the open, and

gained a complete victory. The Governor-in-Chief telegraphed his

congratulations on this brilliant success. A few weeks later Warren

had another successful fight at Tabi Ndoda on 29th April, when he

was slightly wounded. He was frequently mentioned in despatches,

and his conspicuous personal bravery, no less than his skill as

a commander, was brought to the notice of the Secretary of State

for War. The Governor-in-Chief especially commended him in his

despatches for ‘energy, ability, and resource displayed under most

trying circumstances.’ He had been promoted to be Major on 10th

April 1878, and his services in the campaign were recognised by a

brevet-lieutenant-colonelcy, dated 11th November 1878, and the South

African medal.

_Native Rebellion in Griqualand West and Troubles with the

Bechuanas, 1878-9_

Early in May the whole native population of Griqualand West, west

of the Vaal river, broke out in rebellion and, joining their former

enemies, the Kaal Kafirs (refugees from Cape Colony), commenced

depredations to the west of Griquatown. In consequence of this

critical state of affairs in Griqualand West the Executive Government

telegraphed for the assistance of Warren and the Diamond Fields Horse

from the Cape Colony. The regiment left King William’s Town on 14th

May and arrived at Griquatown on 10th June.

While Colonels Lanyon and Warren were fighting the rebels in the

far west the Bechuanas made incursions over the northern border,

murdering the white residents at Daniel’s Kuil and Cornforth

Hill, wrecking the mission station at Moteto in Bechuanaland, and

threatening the lives of the traders and missionaries in Kuruman

itself. Lanyon and Warren fought several successful actions with

the insurgent Griquas and Kaal Kafirs, particularly that at Paarde

Kloof on 18th June. Lanyon then returned to Kimberley, leaving Warren

in command of the Field Force with instructions to proceed to the

northern border in case assistance were required there. Commandant

Ford had been sent to the northern border for the express purpose

of saving the Kuruman mission station, and on 2nd July met with a

repulse at Koning (close to the border of Griqualand), but defeated

the enemy at Manyering on 8th July, and the following day arrived at

Kuruman. His force, however, was too small to do more than act on

the defensive, and he asked for assistance. Warren arrived with the

Field Force at Kuruman on 14th July, and Lanyon with a detachment

of troops on the 16th. On the 18th Warren’s force attacked Gomaperi

successfully, and on 23rd July carried Takoon by assault; and in

August the force returned to Kimberley, leaving a garrison to

protect Kuruman.

In consequence of the rebels joining with the Bechuanas it was found

necessary to continue the war, for Kuruman and Griqualand were both

threatened. Warren was again entrusted with the command of the Field

Forces on 21st September, and signally defeated the combined forces

of the Griquas, Bechuanas, and Old Colony Kafirs on 11th, 12th, and

14th October at Mokolokue’s Mountain. He then issued a proclamation,

which exhibited both firmness and tact, and offered an amnesty to all

but the ringleaders and murderers. This had a good effect.

Hostilities recommenced on the northern border (Cape Colony) in

January 1879, and subsequently in Bechuanaland and the Keate Award,

and the Griqualand West forces were ordered to co-operate with those

of the Cape Colony. On 11th February Warren was appointed Acting

Administrator of Griqualand West and disarmed all the natives.

During this and the following month the whole country was disturbed

in consequence of the disaster at Isandhlwana, and Warren offered

to take 500 white troops to the assistance of Lord Chelmsford, but

it was not considered desirable to take 500 white men away from

Kimberley at so critical a time. As Special Commissioner Warren

inquired into the land question of the Bloemhof districts, and in

April commanded the Griqualand West Field Forces in the northern

border of Cape Colony, and made arrangements to prevent the rebels

breaking through again into Griqualand West. They were thus forced

into Bechuanaland, and in conjunction with the Bechuanas again

threatened Kuruman. The Bechuana and Griqua ringleaders and the Cape

Colony rebels were defeated and captured by the Griqualand West

forces in August, and Warren was able to reduce the strength of his

columns in the field. He was invalided home in the autumn on account

of the hurt he sustained from the falling tree. He left the Cape much

to the regret of the South African people, among whom his name had

become a household word, and his departure was regarded by them in

the light of a personal loss. For his services during the past year

he received a clasp to his South African medal and nothing more.

The Colonial Office made a strenuous but unsuccessful endeavour

to procure for him a brevet-colonelcy, and made the following

representation to the War Office in December 1879:

‘Until August 1878 Colonel Lanyon appears to have remained in the

field, but Lieut.-Colonel Warren, though not occupying a higher

position than that of Chief of Colonel Lanyon’s Staff, appears

to have acted to a great extent independently and not under his

immediate supervision; and when, at the close of the engagement

of 18th June at the Paarde Kloof, Colonel Lanyon arrived with

the Southern Column, he left Lieut.-Colonel Warren in command to

complete the victory, considering that the entire credit of the

brilliant success then attained was due to Lieut.-Colonel Warren.

‘In the operations at Kuruman and the capture of Litako and Takoon

Lieut.-Colonel Warren not only behaved with dashing personal

bravery as on previous occasions, but contributed materially to the

success of an operation which in many particulars clearly resembled

those just concluded against Morosi’s Mountain and Sekukuni’s Town.

‘In September 1878 Colonel Lanyon, being fully occupied with the

civil duties of his office, despatched Lieut.-Colonel Warren in

independent command of a Colonial force organised by him, to

operate against a combination of Griquas, Korannas, and Bechuanas

who were assembled at the Mokolokue’s Mountain on the confines

of the Kalahari desert, and were threatening the province with

invasion. It will be seen from the Reports that Lieut.-Colonel

Warren had here again to deal with the problem of capturing a

fortified mountain, which had proved so difficult in recent

South African warfare; and he effected his object by a brilliant

strategical movement, taking the enemy in reverse, and driving them

at once from their most formidable lines of defence, the work of

clearing them from krantzes, in which they subsequently took up

position, being successfully accomplished on the same day.

‘In January 1879 Warren succeeded Colonel Lanyon in the civil

administration of Griqualand West, but still retained the military

command in the province, and either personally conducted or

directed further operations in the south of the province, and to

the north and north-west, beyond the provincial border....

‘Not only were Lieut.-Colonel Warren’s military operations

successful throughout, but they were accompanied by a large measure

of political success; his tact, humanity, and moderation in victory

having done much to convert our enemies into friends, and to

promote the permanent pacification of the districts to the north of

the Orange River, over which our influence extends.

‘Lieut.-Colonel Warren has already been rewarded for his services

in the Gaika war by the brevet of lieut.-colonel, but his

subsequent services in Griqualand West form a distinct and very

creditable episode in the history of the recent South African

warfare, for which Sir Michael Hicks-Beach hopes that he may be

considered entitled to fresh recognition in the form of the brevet

of colonel, or such other mark of approbation as Colonel Stanley

and H.R.H. the Field-Marshal Commanding-in-Chief may think proper

to recommend.

‘The operations of 1878-9 throughout South Africa should be

regarded as a whole, and Sir Michael Hicks-Beach trusts that

officers of the Regular Army who have organised and led to

victory the Colonial Levies in separate commands may be thought

not less deserving of the usual military rewards than officers

who have served under the immediate direction of the General

Commanding-in-Chief in leading her Majesty’s Regular Troops;

indeed, those of the former class have some special claims to

consideration on account of the difficulties which they had to

overcome; and in organising not only a combatant force, but also

the Transport, Commissariat, Pay and Hospital Departments of that

force, Lieut.-Colonel Warren displayed a general knowledge of

his profession which marks him as an especially intelligent and

valuable servant of the Queen.’

CHATHAM, 1880 TO 1882

The voyage home from South Africa was very beneficial to Warren’s

health, and early in 1880 he was able to take up the duties of the

post of Instructor of Surveying at the School of Military Engineering

at Chatham, to which he had been appointed. It would be too little

to say he entered with his usual zest into his new duties, because

he delighted in surveying, and nothing pleased him better than to

have a number of young officers to train in all its branches, and to

instruct in practical astronomy after Mess in the R.E. Observatory,

to say nothing of the large classes of officers of the Line which

passed through his hands and the training of the Sappers of his own

Corps. In 1881 Warren contributed to the Professional Papers of the

Royal Engineers a paper on the Boundary Line between the Orange Free

State and Griqualand West.

EGYPT AND ARABIA PETRÆA, 1882 TO 1883

But the even tenor of his way was broken in upon suddenly in the

summer of 1882. It may, perhaps, be remembered that when events

in Egypt in 1882 made it likely that we should have to undertake

military operations in that country, Professor Palmer, Professor of

Arabic at Cambridge, who was well acquainted with Syria and Arabia,

and Captain Gill, R.E., a distinguished traveller, were sent in June

to win over the chiefs of the Bedouin tribes in the South of Syria

and on the borders of the Suez Canal. They successfully accomplished

their journey and arrived at Suez on 1st August. Professor Palmer

reported that the Bedouins were favourably disposed, and that plenty

of camels could be procured for the army. On 8th August he left

Suez to go to Nakhl in the desert, half way between Suez and Akaba,

to procure camels for the Indian contingent. He was accompanied by

Captain Gill, who was attached to the Intelligence Department, and

whose mission was to cut the telegraph line in the desert, and by

Lieut. Charrington, R.N., flag-lieutenant to Admiral Sir William

Hewett. The party carried 3,000_l._ in gold, and, although provided

with a guide, no escort was taken, as no danger was apprehended. Soon

after the party left Moses Wells opposite Suez, rumours reached Suez

that their baggage had been plundered. Inquiries were set on foot

in all directions with no definite result, and the country and the

Government were alarmed and feared that some disaster had occurred.

Lieut.-Colonel Charles Warren, whose experience and qualification

for dealing with an inquiry among Arabs were highly thought of,

was selected by the Government to go on special service under the

Admiralty and take charge of a search expedition, and, should the

rumours of the murder of the party prove true, to bring the murderers

to justice. The task was a difficult and an exceptionally dangerous

one--to go into the desert and search among the wild Bedouin tribes

for the ill-fated expedition, with no loyal Arabs who could be called

upon to assist.

Warren went off in August at twelve hours’ notice to Egypt, and,

after reporting to the Admiral, proceeded to Tor, and at a later date

to Akaba by steamer. He found the Arabs at both places singularly

indisposed to enter into any communications; but up to the end of

September, and even later, he did not despair of the travellers being

still alive, and it was not until 24th October that he could report

with certainty the story of their tragic deaths on the previous 10th

August, and that he had found their remains.

Having no friendly Arabs to depend upon, Warren had to resort to the

expedient of suddenly swooping down on some Bedouins about Zagazig,

who had been fighting against us a week before, and capturing

several hundreds of them. These he sorted out, imprisoning some as

hostages, and taking 220, selected from various tribes, with him

as an escort into the desert. He was accompanied by Lieutenants

Burton and Haynes and Quartermaster-Sergeant Kennedy, all of the

Royal Engineers. After ascertaining that Professor Palmer had

been murdered, the expedition entered the desert in search of the

murderers; Warren made his arrangements for their capture, and

succeeded in taking eight out of fifteen. These were brought to

trial, convicted, and hanged.

During his hazardous operations Warren visited Akaba, where Arabi’s

flag was flying, and reduced it to submission. He also captured Nakhl

in the desert, which he reduced by surrounding it and cutting off

supplies; this caused a mutiny in the garrison and they capitulated.

In the House of Commons on 16th November Mr. Gladstone said that

‘Colonel Warren had performed the task of investigating the

circumstances of the murders with great energy and judgment, as well

as knowledge.’

On 27th November Admiral Sir Beauchamp Seymour conveyed to Warren by

letter his entire approbation of the means he had adopted ‘at much

personal danger to ascertain the fate of Professor Palmer and his

comrades. The perseverance and zeal,’ he says, ‘manifested by you and

by the subaltern officers of the Royal Engineers under your orders,

more especially during the trying march between Nakhl and the Suez

Canal, reflect the greatest credit on the noble Corps to which you

belong.’

An Admiralty letter of 4th December 1882 to Lord Alcester desires him

to inform Colonel Warren that the Lords of the Admiralty ‘are very

grateful to him for the energy, courage, and good judgment with which

he has prosecuted the inquiry, under circumstances of considerable

difficulty and danger.’ And again on 1st January 1883 Captain

Stephenson, the senior naval officer, conveyed their Lordships’ ‘high

appreciation of the manner in which Colonel Warren had performed the

difficult task of ascertaining the fate of Professor Palmer’s party.’

Captain Stephenson, who was at Suez when the search was going on,

added: ‘I wish to add my testimony to the patient, but energetic and

persevering, manner in which you have traced the sad fate of the

missing party, against many adverse circumstances in a part of the

country so desolate that assistance from me would have been of no

avail had any untoward circumstances occurred to your party.’

On 22nd January the Admiralty renewed their expression of their very

high appreciation of Warren’s services, and the Commander-in-Chief

of the army, H.R.H. the Duke of Cambridge, informed him of his high

satisfaction at receiving a very favourable report from the Admiralty

on the able manner in which he had carried out the duty entrusted

to him, and his own appreciation of the ‘hazardous services’ he had

performed. Warren, who was already a brevet-colonel,[2] was promoted

to be a Knight Commander of St. Michael and St. George on the Queen’s

birthday, 24th May, and the Admiralty congratulated him in a letter

of 25th May 1883, expressing the gratification felt by the Board at

this mark of the Queen’s approval of the most valuable services which

he had rendered to her Majesty’s Government throughout the whole

time he was engaged in investigating the circumstances of the murder

of Professor Palmer and his party, and in bringing the guilty persons

to justice. Lieut.-General Sir Andrew Clarke, Inspector-General of

Fortifications, wrote to him in January 1883: ‘You are doing your

mission right well; we are all proud of you.’ Lord Northbrook wrote

in the same sense, and afterwards told Sir Charles Warren that his

exertions had saved the country an expenditure of at least two

millions on an expedition into the desert, which must have been

undertaken had he been unsuccessful. Warren received the Egyptian

medal and bronze star, and was also decorated by the Khedive with the

third class of the Order of the Mejidie.

CHATHAM, 1883-4

On his return home he resumed his duties at Chatham as the head of

the Surveying School. In 1884, when General Gordon was shut up in

Khartoum and completely cut off by the Mahdi, Warren volunteered to

go through Abyssinia and open communication with his old friend.

He was for some time in correspondence with Mr. W. E. Forster on

the subject, and Lieut.-General Sir Andrew Clarke highly approved

of the proposal, and wrote a minute in favour of it. In the end,

however, the idea was abandoned when it was decided to send a relief

expedition under Lord Wolseley. Warren found time during 1883 to

write a pamphlet giving a concise account of the military occupation

of South Bechuanaland in 1878-9, and he also contributed to the

Professional Papers of the Corps of Royal Engineers ‘Notes on Arabia

Petræa and the Country lying between Egypt and Palestine.’

BECHUANALAND EXPEDITION, 1884-5

In that part of Bechuanaland lying to the north of Griqualand West,

the white man had been rapidly encroaching upon native territory

since the days when Warren commanded the Field Force of Griqualand

West and prevented the Bechuanas invading the province. Two republics

had been established in Bechuanaland; one, called Stellaland, in

which English and Dutch adventurers had already taken possession of

the land, ‘eaten up’ the native tribes, and become to some extent

a settled people; the other, named Goshenland, in which Transvaal

filibustering Boers plundered and oppressed the native race, and

treated it with cruelty. These raiding Boers were supported by the

Transvaal Government, which, since the so-called ‘magnanimous’

settlement, after the Majuba defeat of the British, and the exposure

of the weak and vacillating policy of the British Government in the

South African Colonies, had steadily set before it the substitution

of a Dutch South Africa for a British, and had exhibited a contempt

for the Queen’s authority which was rapidly developing.

All attempts to arrange with Mr. Kruger, President of the Transvaal

Republic, for an equitable settlement of the Bechuanaland questions

having failed, and further negotiations being useless, the Government

had nothing left to them but to employ force. It was, however,

desirable, in sending troops into the country to enforce the views of

the Government, that the commander should be a man who had not only a

thorough knowledge of the country and of the questions in dispute,

but was also regarded as an authority in the settlement of land

questions by both the British colonists and the Boers. In this way it

was hoped that perhaps the moral support of an adequate force might

enable him to settle matters satisfactorily, without having recourse

to fighting.

Colonel Sir Charles Warren was the man who best fulfilled the

required conditions, and was selected for the command of the

expedition, given the local rank of Major-General, and appointed

Special Commissioner.

A force of 5,000 men was raised and equipped, and supplemented by

special troops and corps from home, one of which was Methuen’s

Horse. Warren’s instructions were to remove the filibusters from

Bechuanaland, to restore order in the territory, to reinstate

the natives in their lands, to take measures to prevent further

depreciation, and finally to hold the country until its further

destination was known. As Special Commissioner he was to be under

the directions of Sir Hercules Robinson, Governor of the Cape Colony

and High Commissioner in South Africa, but was to be left a large

discretion as regards local matters. In regard to operations in the

field, he was to be responsible to the Secretary of State for War and

the General Commanding in South Africa, and was not to be accountable

to the Colonial Government or the High Commissioner.

Sir Charles Warren landed at Cape Town on 4th December 1884, and

soon pushed his force up country into the disputed territory. The

promptness with which he moved, and the efficiency of his force gave

him the moral support which he required in carrying on negotiations

with Mr. Kruger, and in these diplomatic dealings he exhibited the

ability and tact which had distinguished him on previous occasions

when called upon to settle disputes of a similar kind.

An officer of the expedition wrote home in August 1885:

‘Immediately after I despatched my last, it became evident that

this Bechuanaland business was practically played out as a

campaign. I should think there never before was such a case of a

brilliantly executed advance into a distant country, followed by

such complete inanition, as has fallen upon everybody (except, of

course, the General Officer Commanding, who has had plenty to

do politically) as took place here. By 2nd April the General and

Headquarters Staff were fully established up at Mafeking (Rooi

Grond), with telegraphic communication--220 miles, working without

a hitch, I am glad to say--from end to end of the occupied country,

and stores enough along the whole length of line to feed the entire

army for three months. It really was a master stroke, considering

the slowness of transport, the sandy state of much of the road,

and the scarcity of water. But when one has said that one has said

everything--since that time we, as an expedition, have simply been

standing still.’

But ‘they also serve who only stand and wait,’ and while the

expedition was chafing at being kept idle, with no fighting to

do, and the prospect of rewards and distinctions for the campaign

fading away, the moral effect of its presence made itself felt. The

Transvaal Government, finding itself unprepared to fight, changed

its attitude and Sir Charles Warren was able to make a peaceful

settlement with Mr. Kruger, though not without many difficulties. He

returned to England after a bloodless campaign, receiving the thanks

of Parliament and of the Colonial Legislature, and promotion to the

Grand Cross of the Order of St. Michael and St. George. But he was

not made a supernumerary major-general after holding that rank in the

field, and, on his return, reverted to the rank of colonel.

CANDIDATE FOR PARLIAMENT, 1885

At the General Election of the autumn of 1885 Sir Charles Warren

was invited to stand as a candidate for Parliament to represent the

Hallam division of Sheffield in the Liberal interest, and in his

address he took an independent position, making no mention of any

party leader.

The principal points he laid stress on were:

(1) The Empire could not stand still. ‘Forward’ must be the motto.

(2) The prosperity of the nation depended on the moral tone of the

people continuing at a high standard, which could only be maintained

by unremitting attention to the religious education of the children.

Instruction, therefore, in the truths of Christianity must be real

and efficient.

(3) Education must be sound both as to mind and body, and in

elementary schools must be free, and the greatest attention paid to

physical training.

(4) The connection between the Mother Country and the Colonies must

be strengthened, a fixed colonial policy should be established clear

of party politics, and a federal parliament of the Empire should be

looked forward to.

(5) Ireland must remain part of the United Kingdom, but the greatest

amount of self-government practicable should be accorded to it.

(6) County Councils should be established.

(7) Disestablishment of Church with State only desirable if wanted by

both sides.

(8) Local option.

(9) Reforms regarding land tenure.

(10) Reform of House of Lords.

(11) Reforms in House of Commons to prevent obstruction.

Sir Charles was unsuccessful at the poll, but he had so won the

hearts of the Liberal constituents that they paid the whole of his

election expenses, and, on his leaving the constituency, presented

him with an address and a handsome case of Sheffield plate and

cutlery.

SUAKIN, 1886

In January 1886 Sir Charles Warren was appointed to command the

troops at Suakin, with the rank of Major-General on the Staff, and to

be Governor of the Red Sea Littoral. On arrival at his headquarters,

Suakin, he was greeted by a telegram from Simla containing

congratulations on his appointment from Lord Dufferin, under whom he

had served diplomatically when he was engaged in the Palmer Search

Expedition.

Warren found that the Suakin garrison was composed of three

nationalities--British, Indian, and Egyptian--all acting under

different regulations, and he at once set to work to introduce a

better organisation into the garrison, and to have a mobile force

to drive inland the Hadendowa Arabs, who were in the habit of

firing into Suakin every night. He took the friendly natives into

service and put them in the field against the Hadendowas, and in a

few days had a clear zone of several miles round the town. He also

commenced arrangements to open up the country as far as Berber and

to start commercial operations at various ports on the Red Sea, to

open up salt works, &c.; but he found no response from the Egyptian

authorities at Cairo, and soon discovered that they did not wish to

encourage trade by Suakin, as it would reduce that going through

Cairo.

After three months in this appointment, when he was beginning to find

that there was nothing to do but to sit down and hold the place, he

received a telegram from Mr. Childers, the Home Secretary, offering

him the Chief Commissionership of the Metropolitan Police, at a

time when there had been a considerable panic in London, and Sir

Edmund Henderson had resigned the office. He accepted the offer, and

left Suakin at the end of March. Before leaving he received a very

sympathetic address from the merchants in Suakin, recognising the

effort he had made on behalf of trade with the interior and along the

coast.

CHIEF COMMISSIONERSHIP OF POLICE, 1886 TO 1888

In his new position Warren had several difficult and complicated

problems to deal with. During the very first year of office the

Trafalgar Square demonstrations, permitted by a weak Government,

tested the powers of the police under their new chief to preserve

public order. The Liberal party abused their own nominee, but he was

firm. Then there were all the arrangements for the preservation of

order at the Queen’s Jubilee in 1887, which were so ably carried out.

He received many complimentary letters: one from the Home Secretary

expressing her Majesty’s entire approbation of the excellent manner

in which the arrangements for preserving good order were made by him;

another from the Commander-in-Chief, H.R.H. the Duke of Cambridge,

congratulating him on the admirable manner in which they were carried

out, which in his opinion left nothing to be desired, and reflected

the greatest credit on the Metropolitan Police Force; in a third the

Prince of Wales, as Chairman of the Children’s Jubilee Festival,

caused his thanks to be conveyed to him for the invaluable assistance

he lent on the occasion; and finally Lord Salisbury informed him that

he was very glad to be the medium of acquainting him that the Queen

had been pleased to confer upon him, in special recognition of his

exertions in maintaining order in the metropolis during the past

difficult year, and of his services at the Jubilee celebrations, a

Knight Commandership of the Order of the Bath.

In July appeared a cartoon in ‘Punch’ with the following legend:

All honour to your management, my Warren,

All honour to the force you featly led!

And that honour, Punch opines, should not be barren

(May he hear hereafter more upon _that_ head).

’Midst the Jubilee joyous pageantry and pother,

(Though ’tis common of our Bobbies to make fun)

‘Taking one consideration with another,’

The Policemen’s work was excellently done.

Other difficulties he had to try him during his term of office were

an outbreak of burglaries, the muzzling of dogs, and the Whitechapel

murders, all of which irritated the public and caused the police to

be abused. He was not the man to stand by and hear his force unjustly

criticised without defending it, and he contributed an article to

‘Murray’s Magazine’ on the subject.

In the spring of 1888 he did not think the Home Secretary, Mr.

Matthews, gave him sufficient support, but rather endeavoured to

minimise his authority as head of the force, and he tendered his

resignation. This was not accepted, and he continued in his post

until the autumn, when he decided that he could no longer hold the

appointment with due regard to the good of the force and his own

credit.

The resignation was fully debated in the House of Commons on 14th

November 1888, when the Home Secretary said:

‘He was glad to have the opportunity furnished by what fell from

the Hon. Member for the Horsham Division, to do the fullest justice

to Sir Charles Warren. Sir Charles Warren was a man not only of the

highest character, but of great ability. During his tenure of the

office he had displayed the most indefatigable activity in every

detail of the organisation and administration of the force. By his

vigour and firmness he had restored that confidence in the police

which had been shaken--he believed with the right hon. gentleman,

unjustly shaken--after the regrettable incident of 1886.... Sir

Charles Warren had shown conspicuous skill and firmness in putting

an end to disorder in the metropolis, and for that he deserved the

highest praise.’

Again there appeared a cartoon in ‘Punch’ entitled ‘Extremes Meet,’

in which Sir Charles Warren and his predecessor were depicted

exchanging views:

SIR EDMUND: My dear Warren, you did too much.

SIR CHARLES: And you, my dear Henderson, did too little.

MR. PUNCH: H’m! Sorry for the _new_ man.

It was during his police work that he attended the meeting of the

British Association at Manchester in 1887 as President of the

Geographical Section and gave a very practical and useful opening

address.

STRAITS SETTLEMENTS, 1889 TO 1894

After some months of leisure Warren was appointed to command the

troops in the Straits Settlements in April 1889, as a Colonel on

the Staff with the rank of Major-General. Hitherto this command had

been one with that of Hong-Kong, where the Headquarters were; but,

owing to friction arising in 1888 between the civil and military

authorities in the Straits Settlements, it was decided to send out

an officer to Singapore in independent command to endeavour to make

things work smoothly. The difficulties arose from the peculiar nature

of the agreement which had been made with the Straits Settlements

when they were detached from India and established as a Crown Colony.

Sir Charles Warren soon found that the existing system was

impracticable for efficiency, and it was altered, but in carrying

out the alteration there arose a good deal of difference of opinion

between the civil and military authorities. Moreover, as a member of

council, Sir Charles Warren came to the conclusion that the annual

military contribution should be a sum calculated _pro rata_ to the

revenue up to the amount required. This gave great offence to the

colonists, who wished for a fixed sum, which was finally agreed to.

But in two years the revenue of the Colony rapidly diminished owing

to changes in the opium farming, &c., and the people found themselves

paying a much higher sum than they would have done according to Sir

Charles Warren’s proposal. Then they recognised his foresight, and

popular feeling changed in his favour.

During the five years Sir Charles was in the Straits Settlements he

did much travelling and occupied in the aggregate ten months (his two

months’ leave per annum) in seeing India, Ceylon, Burma, Siam, Java,

Japan, and some of the seaports of China. The Straits Settlements

being within his command, he visited the several States as a duty,

and, by request, inspected the armed constabulary (Sikhs) of Perak

and Selangor and the troops of the Sultan of Johore. He penetrated

into the uncivilised parts of the Straits Settlements and traversed

the peninsula from east to west, over the mountains from Selangor to

Pahang, through the Sakai country. At the time of the Pahang outbreak

he was ready with his troops for all emergencies, and prepared and

printed a field book for use in the jungle, should circumstances

require it.

He encouraged sports among officers and men, and did much to keep

up a good feeling between the troops and the inhabitants, and

established (under the Garrison Sports Committee) four yearly events,

for which he gave suitable challenge shields. The contests for these

prizes had a stimulating effect on sport in the Malay peninsula.

In addition to his military duties he was for several months chairman

of a committee to inspect and report on the police of the Straits

Settlements. As District Grand Master of the Eastern Archipelago, he

visited the several Masonic Lodges, presided at various functions,

and, on his leaving the Settlements, was presented by the fraternity

with a full-sized portrait of himself and a very handsomely

illuminated address.

The readiness of the garrison of Singapore for defence was brought

to a high pitch of perfection during his tenure of command. When he

first arrived it took several weeks to mobilise, and, after much

practice, he reduced the time to three days; when he arrived at this,

he saw it was not perfect unless it could be done in _three hours_,

and this was accomplished eventually. A practical test of this was

given. One evening, when he was dining at Government House to meet

the Admiral Commanding-in-Chief, the latter began to chaff at the

unreadiness of the army in comparison with the navy, and asserted

his opinion that Singapore could not mobilise under three weeks. Sir

Charles said that the Admiral would have to admit that it could be

done in three hours, and guaranteed that, if the Admiral would be out

at 6 A.M. at the jetty, he would find all the troops in their places,

although some of them would have to march six miles or more in the

dark, and cross the water in launches. The only point that would not

be the same as in time of war was the getting the launches into their

places, as they were in peace positions at the time. At 11 P.M. Sir

Charles Warren ordered the launches to be in position at 3 A.M. and

sent word to the troops to get ready at 1 A.M. They marched down from

Tanglin and Fort Canning Barracks to the wharf, were taken across

in launches and submarine miners, and were all in their places at 6

A.M., when the Governor and Admiral visited them in company with Sir

Charles Warren. The Admiral gave the highest praise a sailor could

give--that it had been done as well as if it had been done by the

navy.

His services at Singapore are summed up in an article in the ‘Straits

Times’ of 2nd April 1894, from which the following is an extract:

‘It is no new thing to speak praise of Sir Charles Warren; and in

trying to estimate the services that he has rendered to the Colony

it is difficult to do more than repeat ourselves. We have already

said he found in Singapore a number of soldiers and some forts,

while he leaves at Singapore a garrison in a fortress. He leaves

a fortress that is one of the strongest in Asia, and he leaves a

garrison whose readiness and perfection of mobilisation cannot

be surpassed. But on that it does not seem necessary to enlarge,

since it is a service that any soldier of first-rate capacity would

have done, and all competent persons knew that Sir Charles Warren

would do it. It is, perhaps, more interesting to record that in

his time Sir Charles Warren has been the best abused man in the

Colony, while at his departure he is as universally esteemed as

any man could be. It is but a couple of years ago that he was the

subject of persistent slander at the hands of persons who now sing

his praises and lament his departure. That conquest of enmity Sir

Charles has achieved by means at once simple and wise. When he

was the subject of detraction he paid no attention, but proceeded

quietly about the affairs he had in hand. When the persons who

had attacked him repented of their methods, he ignored that he

had been attacked, and dealt with the advances of his new friends

as if he had not known that they had been unfriendly. To put it

briefly, he proceeded on the path of duty regardless either of

praise or blame, until better knowledge rendered it impossible for

any one to persist in detraction. Sir Charles leaves the Colony

amidst a universal chorus of friendly greetings. To have achieved

such a conquest of public opinion amidst so small a community is a

great result. For the community is so small that no man can live

in it for a number of years without giving ample opportunity to

see his character in all its moods and tenses. From that scrutiny

Sir Charles Warren has emerged with success. The community of

the Straits feels that in losing him it loses not only a soldier

and a scholar, but also a most excellent example of a kindly and

simple-hearted gentleman.’

At one of the many farewell dinners in his honour Sir Charles

Mitchell, the Governor, said: ‘Each man in his turn played many

parts, but of all men he had known through his experience of this

somewhat difficult world, he knew none who in these times had

played so many parts, and played all those parts so well, as their

distinguished guest, Sir Charles Warren. As a man of letters, and as

a man of action, Sir Charles Warren had distinguished himself.’

Although, when Sir Cecil Smith was Governor, official difficulties

occurred between him and Sir Charles Warren on matters which could

not readily be settled, yet the differences were solely official,

and Sir Cecil Smith was one of the first to send Sir Charles Warren,

when he was leaving England in November 1899 for Natal, hearty good

wishes for his success and safe return with added glory to the high

reputation he had already gained. Sir Charles Warren left the Straits

Settlements on his return to England in April 1894, and he travelled

by way of Vancouver and the American Continent, spending some weeks

in exploring the Western States of the Union.

THAMES DISTRICT, 1895 TO 1898

In 1895 Sir Charles Warren was appointed Major-General commanding

the Thames District, and was told that he was to organise the

mobilisation of the Thames District for defence on the same model he

had so successfully established at Singapore. He took it in hand at

once, and in two years had so perfected the system that all troops

coming into the district were enabled on sudden mobilisation to find

their places and take up their duties immediately.

He was busily engaged, during his term of command, in the problem

of defence of the Thames and Medway, in which a great advance was

made, and in examining into the efficiency of the Royal Engineers for

active service in all their branches, and frequently inspected them

with this object in view.

He instituted field days between the various garrisons; marched all

the infantry to Sheerness during the spring months, and practised

defence of the coast there.

He took great interest in the various new regulations for the canteen

system, and pointed out the difficulty of having one contractor of

groceries. He favoured the tenant system for the dry canteen, while

keeping the wet canteen in the hands of the military.

During the autumn of 1896 he commanded a division at the New Forest

autumn manœuvres.

He established a District Rifle Association at Gravesend, and himself

gave two shields for annual competition: one for rifle shooting and

one for carbine shooting. He evinced great interest in the town of

Chatham and worked, in conjunction with the Mayor and Corporation, to

ameliorate its condition for the benefit both of the soldiers and of

the inhabitants.

On leaving the command in 1898 he was entertained at a public dinner

given by the Mayor, and presented with a silver salver bearing an

inscription, and with an address from which the following is an

extract:--

‘We sincerely thank you for the valuable services you have rendered

to our town; and whilst we much regret that we are losing from our

midst the presence of one so distinguished as a scholar, scientist,

and soldier, we rejoice that whilst here you greatly promoted

cordial relations between the military and civic authorities, and

took great interest in the moral and intellectual welfare of the

inhabitants of Chatham.’

Warren was now on the shelf, and took a house at Ramsgate, where he

resided until his services were again required by his country, and he

was appointed to the command of the 5th Division and embarked with it

for South Africa on 25th November 1899.

CHAPTER I

THE BEGINNING OF THE WAR

The last year of the nineteenth century opened at a period of intense

gloom for the British nation. The war in South Africa had found us,

as most wars do, quite unprepared. The little force in Natal, under

Sir George White, had been speedily surrounded by the mobile Boers,

its line of communication had been cut, and it was itself shut up in

an unfavourable position for defence at Ladysmith, and blockaded by a

Boer force.

Large reinforcements were pouring into South Africa from England,

and Sir Redvers Buller, who had arrived at Cape Town on 31st October

to take supreme command, had gone to Natal. Here he made his first

strategical mistake; and just as Sir George White, induced by

political pressure, occupied positions in the extreme North of Natal,

which he was not strong enough to hold, and had the consequences of

this departure from sound strategy burnt into him by the siege of

Ladysmith, so Sir Redvers Buller, moved by clamours for the relief of

Ladysmith and Kimberley, divided his force, sending part under Lord

Methuen to relieve Kimberley, and himself taking the remainder to

relieve Ladysmith, and learned a similar lesson.

Such inattention to the very elements of strategy might have speedily

led to overwhelming disaster and to the triumph of the Boer States,

and would undoubtedly have done so, had the Boers possessed a general

worthy of the name. With what surprise and satisfaction would such a

commander have observed the disposition of the British force in the

North of Natal, with what rapidity would he have masked Sir George

White’s division, and, crossing the Tugela, seized the railway at

its mouth, and, by the capture of Durban, have held Natal in the

hollow of his hand! But, although the generalship of the Boers was

hopelessly timid, and they lost the opportunity of carrying all

before them at the outset, and driving the British into the sea, the

neglect of sound strategy on our side made itself seriously felt, and

it was not until Lord Roberts, at a later date, having collected and

organised a large force, moved steadily on his objective--the capital

of the Orange Free State--that either Kimberley or Ladysmith was

relieved.

At the end of 1899 disaster after disaster had caused the public

spirit at home to be much depressed, and men began to ask one

another what was the reason. Was it the fault of our generals?

or were the pluck and splendid bravery of our troops--so much

in evidence--impotent, in these days of smokeless powder and

quick-firing and long-range guns, against white men, equally well if

not better armed, accustomed from their childhood to ride and shoot,

stalk game, and avail themselves of cover, knowing the country and

using every device to fight without endangering their own lives?

But to whatever depths the spirit of the nation sank at that terrible

Christmas of 1899, however freely it was confessed that we had

been too cocksure of success, had too much forgotten the God of

battles, had despised our enemy, and arrogantly assumed that the

war would be a walk-over; however much mothers and sisters, widows

and orphans, plunged into saddest mourning by the losses under Lord

Methuen at Belmont, Eslin, the Modder River, and Majesfontein,

under Major-General Gatacre at Stormberg, and under Sir Redvers

Buller at Colenso, might bewail their loved ones who had died for

their country on the battlefield, there was a most notable, a most

wonderful, self-control among the people generally. Subdued by a

distinct sense of disappointment and humiliation as one disaster

after another occurred, there was no hesitation, no acceptance of

defeat, but a dogged determination that the war, being a righteous

war, must at any sacrifice be carried to a victorious conclusion. The

national honour had been wounded by the impudent invasion of British

dominions beyond the seas, and that wound could only be healed by

the complete subjugation of the invader. The galling remembrance

of the disasters of the previous Boer war--never retrieved--of

the overbearing insolence and ingratitude which had rewarded the

pusillanimous policy of so-called magnanimity, had formed amongst

all classes a determination that there must be no more Majuba

treaties. Never again must a British defeat by Boers be allowed to

conclude the matter, to rankle and fester in a way so difficult for a

high-spirited people to bear, even when disguised under the name of

magnanimity. Defeat must only mean renewed effort and determination

to succeed. We were in the hands of God, but, so long as we could

send out a man to fight, we were determined to go on, and, God

willing, at whatever cost to end the matter, once for all, in such a

way that our wounded honour should be healed, the susceptibilities of

our invaded Colonies soothed, and the Boer taught to know his proper

place, but as a member of a free and world-wide Empire and a subject

of the Queen.

Such were the feelings of disappointment and sorrow, and yet of

determination, by which the majority of people at home were animated

when the last year of the nineteenth century commenced, and the

successes of Major-General French at Colesberg, and of Colonel

Pilcher at Douglas on New Year’s Day, cheered despondent hearts, and

inspired a hope that the luck was about to turn.

At this time Lord Roberts, who, after the disasters of the first half

of December 1899, had been sent out to take supreme command, was,

with Lord Kitchener, still on the high seas; Lord Methuen was holding

a position at the Modder River, waiting for reinforcements before

taking further action; Sir Redvers Buller, after the failure of the

attack on Colenso on 15th December 1899, had withdrawn his whole

force (two divisions) to Chieveley, there to mature his plans for a

second advance. Time was passing, Sir George White was hardly pressed

in Ladysmith by the investing Boers, and the 5th Division, commanded

by Sir Charles Warren, had not yet arrived at the Cape. Three days

after the battle of Colenso Sir Redvers Buller had sent orders to

the Cape that this division was to be sent on to him at once, and he

awaited its arrival before making his next move.

It was no wonder then that, in the state of public feeling at home

at this time, the chief interest centred in the Natal Field Force,

and great expectations were formed of what Sir Redvers Buller, whose

reputation as a man of exceptional power and ability stood high in

the official world, would do when reinforced by the 5th Division

under so capable a commander as Sir Charles Warren. This officer,

as we have seen, had recently commanded the Thames District and

had gained much experience in South African warfare twenty years

previously, while some years later he was entrusted with the command

of the Bechuanaland Expedition, and carried through the campaign

so successfully that the Boers yielded all the main issues without

fighting. When he was nominated to the command of the 5th Division

in November every one rejoiced, wondering only that he had not

been among the first generals to be sent out. When he landed with

his division in Natal on the first day of the New Year, and by his

seniority became second in command to Sir Redvers Buller, great hope

was entertained that the combined wisdom of these two distinguished

men would soon solve the difficulty of the relief of Ladysmith, and

the operations immediately after his arrival were watched at home

with hopeful if critical eyes.

WARREN CROSSES THE TUGELA

On the disembarkation of the 5th Division at Durban at the beginning

of 1900 it at once entrained for Estcourt, where it arrived on 3rd

January, adding to the strength of the Natal Field Force about 50

per cent. of both field artillery and infantry. Three days later Sir

Charles Warren went to Frere to report to Sir Redvers Buller that his

division was mobilised and ready to march.

Sir Redvers Buller had now decided to make another attempt to relieve

Ladysmith, and this time he proposed to cross the Tugela higher up

than Colenso, and force a way through the hills opposite Potgieter’s

Drift. Accordingly an army order was issued on 8th January directing

the following moves to take place under the orders of Lieut.-General

Sir C. F. Clery, K.C.B., on the night of the 9th to 10th January.

2ND DIVISION AND ATTACHED TROOPS

(_a_) _Major-General Hildyard’s Column_

Mounted Brigade: 400 of all ranks (including one squadron 13th

Hussars).

2nd Infantry Brigade.

Divisional Troops: a battery of Royal Field Artillery.

Corps Troops: 2 naval 12-pr. guns.

To move from Chieveley by the south of Doorn Kop to the camp already

selected in the vicinity of Pretorius Farm.

(_b_) _Major-General Hart’s Column_

Mounted Brigade: 400 of all ranks.

5th Infantry Brigade.

73rd Battery Royal Field Artillery.

17th Field Company Royal Engineers.

Corps Troops: 6 naval 12-pr. guns.

To move from Frere by the Frere-Springfield road to the camp selected

south of Pretorius Farm.

(_c_) _Headquarters and Divisional Troops 2nd Division_

Mounted Brigade: Headquarters and main body Supply Column (from

Frere), Medical unit.

Divisional Troops: a battery of Royal Field Artillery, Ammunition

Column, Supply Column (from Frere), Field Hospital (from Frere).

Corps Troops: 2 squadrons 13th Hussars, 2 guns 66th Battery Royal

Field Artillery, 2 naval 4·7-inch guns, Supply Column (from Frere).

To move from Chieveley (except where otherwise mentioned) by the

Frere-Springfield road to the camp south of Pretorius Farm, except

that one squadron 13th Hussars for the 5th Division and 2 guns 66th

Battery Royal Field Artillery will be left at Frere.

5TH DIVISION AND ATTACHED TROOPS

The following troops will move on the evening of 10th January from

Frere to Springfield, under the orders of the Lieutenant-General Sir

C. Warren, G.C.M.G., K.C.B.:--

_5th Division_

4th Infantry Brigade.

11th Infantry Brigade.

Divisional Troops.

_Corps Troops_

10th Brigade.

Artillery--

61st Battery Royal Field Artillery (Howitzer).

78th Battery Royal Field Artillery.

Ammunition Column.

Engineers--

Pontoon Troop.

Balloon Section.

Section Telegraph Division.

Supply Park.

On 9th January the following explanatory memorandum was issued from

Frere Camp:--

1. The General proposes to effect the passage of the River Tugela,

in the neighbourhood of Potgieter’s Drift, with a view to the

relief of Ladysmith.

2. Forces (already detailed) will be left at Chieveley and Frere to

hold these points, while the remainder of the army is operating on

the enemy’s right flank.

3. Springfield will be seized and occupied, and the march of the

main body and supplies to that point will be covered by a force

encamped about Pretorius Farm.

4. With reference to Field Orders, dated 8th instant, paragraph 2

(_a_), the primary duty of Major-General Hildyard’s column is to

protect the march of the troops from Frere to Springfield during

the formation of a supply depôt at Springfield, but he will also

operate so as to induce the enemy to believe that our intention is

to cross the River Tugela at Porrit’s Drift.

5. As stated in paragraph 2 (_b_) and (_c_) of the Field Order

above quoted, the remainder of Lieut.-General Clery’s force will

encamp south of Pretorius Farm. Major-General Hart will, under

General Clery’s orders, assist in every way the supply columns

as they pass his camp, and he will also be prepared to support

Major-General Hildyard, if necessary.

6. On the afternoon of the 10th instant General Clery will send

a sufficient force from the Mounted Brigade, with Artillery, to

reconnoitre, and, if possible, occupy Springfield.

7. The force under General Warren’s command (Field Order, dated

8th instant, paragraph 3) will reach Springfield on the morning of

the 11th instant, in support of the mounted troops referred to in

paragraph 6 of this order.

8. The General Commanding-in-Chief will proceed to Springfield on

the 11th instant.

Between 10th and 13th January the whole Natal Field Force, except

the 5th Brigade covering Colenso, was in motion from Chieveley,

Frere, and Estcourt, concentrating on Springfield within five miles

of Potgieter’s Drift (Spearman’s or Mount Alice). This position was

seized by the cavalry on 11th January, on which day General Buller

telegraphed home that he had occupied the south bank of the Tugela at

Potgieter’s Drift, and seized the pont, that the river was in flood,

and the enemy strongly intrenched four and a half miles to the north.

The objective was the advance to Ladysmith by forcing the passage

of the Tugela at Potgieter’s, and, with this in view, maps of the

country about the drift were issued, with an account of the road

from Potgieter’s to Ladysmith. Upon reconnoitring the Boer positions

on the hills in front of Potgieter’s Sir Redvers Buller, however,

came to the conclusion that they were too strong to be taken by

direct attack, and on 14th January he directed Sir Charles Warren to

reconnoitre Trichard’s Drift, some six miles higher up the river to

the westward, with a view to the possibility of crossing there and

advancing to the west of Spion Kop and getting round to the north of

that hill.

On 15th January the following secret orders were issued by Sir R.

Buller to Sir C. Warren:--

1. The enemy’s position in front of Potgieter’s Drift seems to me

to be too strong to be taken by direct attack.

2. I intend to try and turn it by sending a force across the Tugela

from near Trichard’s Drift, and up to the west of Spion Kop.

3. You will have command of that force, which will consist of the

11th Brigade of your Division, your Brigade Division, Royal Field

Artillery, and General Clery’s Division complete, and all the

mounted troops except 400.

4. You will of course act as circumstances require, but my idea

is that you should continue throughout, refusing your right and

throwing your left forward till you gain the open plain north of

Spion Kop. Once there you will command the rear of the position

facing Potgieter’s Drift, and I think render it untenable.

5. At Potgieter’s there will be the 4th Brigade, part of the 10th

Brigade, one battery Royal Field Artillery, one howitzer battery,

two 4·7-inch naval guns. With them I shall threaten both the

positions in front of us, and also attempt a crossing at Skiet’s

Drift, so as to hold the enemy off you as much as possible.

6. It is very difficult to ascertain the numbers of the enemy with

any sort of exactness. I do not think there can be more than 400 on

your left, and I estimate the total force that will be opposed to

us at about 7,000. I think they have only one or at the most two

big guns.

7. You will take two and a half days’ supply in your regimental

transport, and a supply column holding one day more. This will give

you four days’ supply, which should be enough. Every extra wagon is

a great impediment.

8. I gathered that you did not want an ammunition column. I think

myself that I should be inclined to take one column for the two

Brigade Divisions. You may find a position on which it is expedient

to expend a great deal of ammunition.

9. You will issue such orders to the Pontoon Troop as you think

expedient. If possible, I should like it to come here after you

have crossed. I do not think you will find it possible to let oxen

draw the wagons over the pontoons. It will be better to draw them

over by horses or mules, swimming the oxen; the risk of breaking

the pontoons, if oxen crossed them, is too great.

10. The man whom I am sending you as a guide is a Devonshire man:

he was employed as a boy on one of my own farms; he is English to

the backbone, and can be thoroughly trusted. He thinks that if you

cross Springfield flat at night he can take you the rest of the way

to the Tugela by a road that cannot be overlooked by the enemy, but

you will doubtless have the road reconnoitred.

11. I shall endeavour to keep up heliographic communication with

you from a post on the hill directly in your rear.

12. I wish you to start as soon as you can. Supply is all in, and

General Clery’s Division will, I hope, concentrate at Springfield

to-day. Directly you start I shall commence to cross the river.

13. Please send me the 10th Brigade, except that portion which you

detail for the garrison at Springfield, as soon as possible; also

the eight 12-pr. naval guns, and any details, such as ammunition

column, &c., that you do not wish to take.

On the same day Sir Redvers Buller issued a spirited appeal to the

troops in which he said ‘We are going to the relief of our comrades

in Ladysmith; there will be no turning back.’ Great was the rejoicing

of the men, and Sir Redvers was greeted with cheers wherever he

showed himself and shouts of ‘No turning back this time.’

Sir Charles Warren’s force was in fact a flying column consisting of

1,500 mounted troops, 12,000 infantry, and 36 field guns, carrying

with it three and a half days’ provisions. The wagons, guns, and

wheeled vehicles of this force (leaving all tents, camp equipage, and

stores behind) formed a column fifteen miles in length.

The whole of the long-range guns, the howitzer battery, the mountain

battery, and two brigades of infantry (8,000 men) remained with Sir

Redvers Buller at Potgieter’s.

The force thus placed under Sir Charles Warren’s command was

hastily put together, and he could not even see them all before

they started. The 5th Division had but recently arrived--some of

the battalions having just landed from a long sea voyage--had been

hurriedly mobilised, and was not acclimatised to the heat of Natal in

midsummer. The 2nd Division had only just arrived from Chieveley and

was unknown to General Warren until he met it on the line of march

on 16th January, while the mounted troops he only saw in detail, as

they did not join his command until the 17th of the month. No extra

Staff was allotted to the force as a whole, and upon the Staff of the

5th Division were thrown the additional staff duties of the flying

column, for no regimental officers were available, all being required

with their units.

Sir Charles Warren was ordered to move as soon as supplies were

all in and the 10th Brigade had removed from Springfield Bridge

to Spearman’s Hill. He tells us in his despatch that he made his

arrangements for getting supplies on 15th January, moved the 10th

Brigade on the following day, and on the evening of that day left

Springfield with a force under his command which amounted to an army

corps (less one brigade), and by a night march arrived at Trichard’s

Drift, and took possession of the hills on the south side of the

Tugela river.

The officers detailed for intelligence were as yet all with Sir

Redvers Buller, and therefore Sir Charles Warren, once he started,

had to rely for local information entirely on the mounted troops

not yet under his command. They had had only a short march, while

the infantry marching from Springfield had had a very long day’s

march. The cavalry should therefore have been able to carry out some

reconnaissances, but no information could be obtained from them

during the night. On the 17th they came under Sir Charles Warren’s

command, and soon after reported that Wright’s farm was occupied by

Boers. At dawn on the 17th Warren commenced throwing his pontoons

across the Tugela at Trichard’s Drift; but the infantry, crossing by

punts, first Major-General Woodgate’s brigade and then Major-General

Hart’s, got across. Sir Redvers Buller was himself present in the

middle of the day and addressed Major-General Woodgate’s brigade,

giving also directions to that officer as to his attack. The mounted

troops passed over principally by the drift, and went over the

country as far as Acton Homes. By evening Major-Generals Woodgate and

Hart had their brigades with a battery of artillery lining the crests

of the foothills facing Spion Kop.

The crossing of the fifteen miles of wagons could not be carried

out under thirty-six hours, and occupied the night of the 17th and

the whole of 18th January. While this operation was in progress it

was necessary to employ one brigade to protect the convoy to the

south to prevent an incursion of Boers from Middle Drift, and two

brigades to the front. A demonstration was also made by Major-General

Lyttelton at Potgieter’s. By the evening of the 18th the passage of

the river was successfully accomplished by the whole force with all

its impedimenta.

The wagons, however, could not be kept in the hole where the

crossing was effected, and orders were given that they should march

on the following morning to Venter’s Laager, before the attack on

the Rangeworthy hills was commenced. In the meantime the question

of attacking the Boer positions in front of them was considered

by Major-Generals Woodgate and Hart, who reported that it was too

hazardous in the daytime.

During the afternoon of the 18th intelligence was received that a

detachment of our mounted troops had had a successful engagement

with a party of Boers at Acton Homes and that support was required.

Sir Charles Warren sent on the whole of his remaining cavalry (300),

and Major-General Hildyard’s brigade was ordered to march early

the following morning. The engagement resulted in the capture of

thirty-one Boers.

Sir Redvers Buller telegraphed to the Secretary of State for War on

the 18th from Spearman’s Hill:

‘A battery of field artillery, howitzer battery, and Lyttelton’s

brigade are across the Tugela River at Potgieter’s Drift. The

enemy’s position is being bombarded by us. Five miles higher up

Warren has crossed the river by a pontoon bridge, eighty-five yards

long, and hopes that his force will, by this evening, have advanced

five miles from the river. To his right front the enemy are busily

intrenching.’