QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PASSIBILITY OF JUDGMENT AND THE SOUL.

1. Sensations are not affections,[25] but actualizations, and

judgments, relative to passions. The affections occur in what is other

(than the soul); that is, in the organized body, and the judgment

in the soul. For if the judgment were an affection, it would itself

presuppose another judgment, and so on to infinity.[26] Though

accepting this statement, we must, nevertheless, examine whether

the judgment itself, as such, in nowise participates in the nature

of its object; for if it receive the impression thereof,[27] it is

passive. Besides, the "images derived from the senses"--to use the

popular language--are formed in a manner entirely different from what

is generally believed. They are in the same case as the intellectual

conceptions, which are actualizations, and through which, without being

affected, we know objects. In general, neither our reason nor our will

permit us, in any way, to attribute to the soul modifications and

changes such as the heating or cooling of bodies. Further, we have to

consider whether that part of the soul, that is called the passive (or

affective, or irrational), must also be be considered as unalterable,

or as being affectible. But we will take up this question later; we

must begin by solving our earlier problems.

Plotinos: Complete Works, v. 2 In Chronological Order, Grouped in Four Periods · 第 77 / 381 题