An accurate and connected account of the occurrences at the Tahlequah

council, it is well nigh impossible to obtain. Some intimidation[478]

seems to have been used, and there was a report of a collision[479]

between the Ross and Ridge factions some days previous to the meeting.

Drew's regiment, which, when organized, had been placed as a guard[480] on

the northern border, escorted[481] Commissioner Pike to Park Hill and

later took up its station on the treaty ground. Some of Stand Watie's

Confederate forces were also in the neighborhood.[482] In 1865, at the

Fort Smith Council, held for the readjustment of political relations with

the United States government, the Indians of the Neosho Agency gave[483] a

rather picturesque description of the way they had been prevailed upon to

sign the treaty with the Confederate States. The real object of the

Tahlequah meeting was evidently not revealed to them until they had

actually reached the treaty ground. Agent Dorn had told them that they had

to go to the meeting. They went and were there taken in hand by Pike who

said,

If you don't do what we lay before you, we can't say you shall live

happy.

The Indians

feeling badly, just looked on, and the white man went to work, got up

a paper and said I want you to sign that. The Indian did not want to,

but he compelled him. You know yourself that, under such

circumstances, he would do anything to save his life....

Now that the history of the diplomatic relations between the Indian tribes

and the Confederacy has been brought thus far, nothing seems more fitting

than to return to the consideration of the Federal government and its

representatives, its purposes, and its plans, beginning the account with

the Indian Office and Commissioner Dole. Dole's early attempt to prevail

upon the War Department to resume its occupation of Indian Territory was

followed up by the convincing letter of the thirtieth of May in which he

likened the Indians to the Union element in some of the border states and

ended by throwing the full responsibility for any disloyalty that might

appear among them upon the Federal authorities; inasmuch as they had

neglected and were still neglecting to give the support and protection

that any ordinary guardian is bound in honor to give to his wards. Dole

said in writing to Secretary Smith,

... Experience has shown that the presence of even a small force of

federal troops located in the disaffected States has had the effect to

preserve the peace, encourage the friends of the Union, and induce the

people to return to their allegiance.

That this same result would be produced in the Indian country I cannot

doubt, as they can have no inducement to unite with the enemies of the

United States unless we fail as a nation to give them that protection

guaranteed by our treaty stipulations, and which is necessary to

prevent designing and evil-disposed persons from having free

intercourse with them, to work out their evil purposes....[484]

Nothing came of Dole's application and thus was exemplified, as often

before and often since, a very serious defect in the American

administrative system by which the duty of doing a certain thing rests

upon one department and the means for doing it with quite another. It is

surely no exaggeration to say that hundreds and hundreds of times the

Indians have been the innocent victims of friction between the War and

Interior Departments.

But if the authorities at Washington were indifferent to the Indian's

welfare, Senator Lane was neither indifferent to nor ignorant of the

strategical importance of Indian Territory. With him the defence of Kansas

and the means of procuring that defence were everything. Indian Territory

and the Indian tribes came within the scope of the means. And so it

happened that, while he was organizing his Kansas brigade, he

commissioned[485] a man, E. H. Carruth, who had formerly posed as an

educator[486] among the Seminoles, to communicate with the various tribes

for the purpose of determining their real feelings towards the United

States government and of obtaining, if possible, an interview between Lane

and some of their accredited representatives. The interview was to take

place "at Fort Lincoln on the Osage or some point convenient

thereto."[487]

Now a considerable portion of the Creek tribe was in just the right mood

and in just the right situation to receive such overtures in the right

spirit. That portion consisted of those who, after the treaty of July

tenth had been negotiated in the manner already described, had rallied

around Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la; and who, in a Creek convention that had been

called for August fifth had declared that the chiefs, who had signed a

treaty outside the National Council, had violated a fundamental law of the

tribe and had thereby forfeited their administrative rank. The criticism

applied to Motey Kennard and to Echo Harjo, the principal and the second

chief respectively. Kennard, as we have seen, was the leader of the Lower

Creeks and Harjo of the Upper. A further division in Creek ranks was now

inevitable and it came forthwith, the Non-treaty Party, made up mostly of

Upper Creeks, proceeding to recognize[488] Ok-ta-ha-hassee Harjo (better

known as "Sands") as the acting principal chief of the tribe. It also

betook itself westward so as to be as much as possible out of the reach of

the secessionists. When once in a position of at least temporary security,

it despatched Mik-ko Hut-kee (White Chief), Bob Deer, Jo Ellis, and

perhaps others to Washington to confer with the "Great Father."[489]

The Creek delegates, Mik-ko Hut-kee and his companions, went, on their way

to Washington, northward through Kansas, saw Superintendent Coffin[490]

and, later, Lane's agent, E. H. Carruth. This was about the second week of

September and Carruth was at Barnesville, Lane's headquarters. Carruth

received the Creeks kindly, read sympathetically the letter[491] that

they brought from their distressed chiefs, Sands and Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la,

assured the equally distressed delegates of the continued fatherly

interest of the United States government, and sent them on their way,

greatly comforted. It was while these Creek delegates were lingering at

Barnesville that Carruth made a special effort to induce the southern

Indians generally to send representatives for an interview with Lane. He

wrote personally to Ross,[492] to the two Creek chiefs,[493] and to the

Wichita chief, Tusaquach,[494] and, in addition, wrote to the Seminole

chiefs and headmen[495] and to the "loyal" Choctaws and Chickasaws.[496]

Presumably, Superintendent Coffin did not altogether approve of Senator

Lane's taking it upon himself to confer with the Indians who, after all,

were officially Coffin's charges; for, in October, we find him, likewise,

planning for an intertribal conference to be held at Humboldt.[497] It is

rather interesting to look back upon all this and to realize, as perforce

we must, that every plan for conferring with the southern tribes in the

interests of the United States government, at this critical time,

contemplated a meeting at some place outside of Indian Territory. Here

were agents of the Indian's "Great Father" offering protection to the red

men and yet giving incontestable proof in the very details of the offer

that they did not themselves dare to venture[498] beyond the Kansas

boundary. As a matter of fact, all such plans for a general conference

came to nothing, although, as late as November, Lane had still the idea of

one in mind. He was, at the time, hoping to meet the Indians at Leroy[499]

in Coffey County, Kansas, on the twenty-fourth. Lane also continued to

advocate the use of the friendly Indians as soldiers. A little earlier,

Agent Johnson had endorsed[500] Lane's plan in a letter to Commissioner

Dole; but the coming of General Hunter upon the scene considerably

affected the sphere of influence.

Dissatisfaction with Fremont on account of his extravagance, his haphazard

way of issuing commissions, his tardiness, and, above all, his general

military incompetence had crystallized in September; and, by orders[501]

of General Scott on the twenty-fourth of October, Hunter was directed to

relieve him. Hunter reached his post in early November and almost

immediately thereafter, either upon his own initiative or after

consultation with someone like Coffin (it could hardly have been with

Lane; for Lane had gone[502] to Washington, or with Branch; for Branch was

strongly opposed to the project intended), he telegraphed[503] to the War

Department "for permission to muster a Brigade of Kansas Indians into the

service of the United States, to assist the friendly Creek Indians in

maintaining their loyalty." Evidently, the request was not granted,[504]

but duties akin to it were, by arrangement of President Lincoln, conferred

upon Hunter which involved his assuming the responsibility of holding, if

such a plan were feasible, an intertribal council so as to renew the

confidence of the southern Indians in the United States government. A

letter[505] from Dole, outlining the plan, reveals an astonishing

ignorance of just how far those selfsame Indians had gone in their

defection, because of the loss of the confidence.

In the giving of these new duties to General Hunter, there was not the

slightest intention of ignoring Senator Lane. In fact, Dole expressly

mentioned that Lane had called for just such an Indian conference[506] and

suggested that, if Hunter's military duties prevented his meeting the

Indians in person, Lane might take his place, "provided he can be spared

from his post." The whole affair was incident to the reorganization that

had recently, under general orders[507] of the ninth of November, taken

place in the Western Department, from which had resulted a Department of

Kansas, separate and distinct from the Department of Missouri. The

Department of Kansas included "the State of Kansas, the Indian Territory

west of Arkansas, and the Territories of Nebraska, Colorado, and Dakota"

and was to be under the command of Major-general David Hunter[508] with

headquarters at Fort Leavenworth. The idea governing this division of the

old western department was, ostensibly, as Nicolay and Hay express[509]

it, that Kansas might be protected, Indian Territory repossessed, and

Texas reached. As we shall presently see, a similar reorganization took

place, about the same time, in the Confederate western service and for

very much the same reason, the condition of the Indian country being a

very large proportion of that reason. It is barely possible that, as far

as the United States was concerned, Senator Lane's recommendation[510] of

the ninth of October was almost wholly accountable for the change.

It was, undoubtedly, high time that something vigorous was being done to

stay Confederate progress in Indian Territory. Indeed, events were

happening there at this very moment that made all plans for an

inter-tribal conference exceedingly out of date. The Confederate

government had now a large Indian force[511] in the field and expectations

of an increase, provided the necessary arms[512] were obtainable. On the

twenty-second[513] of November, by special orders[514] from Richmond,

Indian Territory had been erected into a separate military department and

Albert Pike, now a brigadier-general, assigned to the command of it. For

the present, however, things seem to have remained much as they were with

McCulloch nominally in command and Cooper in actual charge. Moreover, long

before Pike reappeared upon the scene, matters had come to an issue

between the secessionist and unionist Creeks.

Determined not to allow themselves to be over-persuaded or intimidated by

the secessionist element in their nation, the unionist Creeks, under

Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la, had withdrawn from active intercourse with the rival

faction and, resisting all attempts of Cooper and others to inveigle them

into an interview that might result in compromise, they had encamped at or

near the junction of the Deep and North Forks of the Canadian River.

Cooper resolved to attack them there and, for the purpose, gathered[515]

together an effective fighting force of about fourteen hundred men, all

Indians except for a detachment of Texas cavalry. On the fifth of

November, Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la broke camp and took up the line of march for

Kansas, hoping that, in Kansas, he and his followers would receive either

succor or refuge. It has been estimated that Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la's force,

at this time, was less than two thousand men and that it comprised,

besides Creeks and Seminoles, some two or three hundred negroes. His

traveling cortege was, however, very much larger; for it included women

and children, the sick and the aged. Approximately half of the Creeks were

on the move for pastures new. For many of them it was a second exodus.

Colonel D. H. Cooper reached the deserted camp of Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la on

the fifteenth of November and, finding his enemy gone and locating his

trail, moved himself in a slightly northeasterly direction towards the Red

Fork of the Arkansas. He came up with the unionist Creeks at Round

Mountain on the night of the nineteenth and an indecisive engagement[516]

followed, both sides claiming the victory. Under cover of darkness,

Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la managed to slip away and crossed into the Cherokee

country where there were plenty of disaffected full-bloods to give him

sympathy. It is more than likely that they had invited him there and had

prepared for his coming. Cooper did not attempt to pursue the Creek

refugees, having been called back to the Arkansas line, there to wait in

readiness to reenforce McCulloch should the Federals make a forward march

southward from Springfield, as then seemed probable. But that danger soon

passed, passed even before Cooper had had time to take the post indicated

or to leave his own camp at Concharta, after a brief recuperation. He was

now free to follow up the meagre advantage of the nineteenth.

The next opportunity to crush Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la came in the Battle of

Bird Creek [Chusto-Talasah, Little High Shoals, or the Caving Banks],[517]

fought December 9, 1861. On the twenty-ninth of the preceding month, a

part of Cooper's force had set out for Tulsey Town and an advance guard

had been sent up the Verdigris in the direction of a place, called

"Coody's Settlement," where Colonel John Drew with a detachment of his

regiment of Cherokee full-bloods was posted. The orders were that Drew

should effect a junction with Cooper's main force and, on December eighth

they were all encamped on Bird Creek in the southwestern corner of the

Cherokee Nation. At this juncture, word came that Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la

wished to treat for peace and Major Pegg, a Cherokee, with three

companions was sent forward to confer with him. They found the Creek

chief, surrounded by his warriors and ready for battle. It was evening and

Colonel Cooper had scarcely heard the news of the Creek determination to

fight when a message came that four companies of Drew's regiment,

horrified at the thought of fighting with their neighbors, had dispersed

and gone over to Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la. The incident did not promise well for

success on the morrow and the Battle of Bird Creek was another indecisive

engagement, although the Creeks, eager and resplendent with their yellow

corn-shuck badges, seem to have had all the advantage of position. Again

they made their escape and again Colonel Cooper was prevented from

following them, this time because he was exceedingly fearful lest the

Cherokee desertion might have a lasting and disastrous effect upon the

remaining Indian forces, particularly upon the small group that was all

that was left of the original First Cherokee Mounted Rifles. Cooper's

personal opinion was, that the defection was widespread among the

Cherokees and that it would be sheer folly to start out after

Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la until more white troops had been added to the pursuing

force, by way both of reenforcement and of encouragement.

Instead, therefore, of continuing northward, Colonel Cooper drew off in

the direction of Fort Gibson and, from that point, sent for aid to Colonel

James McIntosh at Van Buren. He then occupied himself with his own troops

and prevailed upon John Ross to rally[518] the Cherokees. It was now the

nineteenth of December and the aged chief did his best to keep his people

true to the faith that the nation had pledged in the treaty of the seventh

of October. He recalled to their minds the fact that it was, by all odds,

the best treaty that the Cherokees had ever secured, the one that gave

them the fullest recognition of their rights as a semi-independent people,

and he might have added with sad, sad truth that it was the best that they

could ever hope to get. He made no such pessimistic reflection, however,

but concluded,

It is, therefore, our duty and interest to respect it, and we must, as

the interest of our common country demands it. According to the

stipulations of the treaty we must meet enemies of our allies whenever

the south requires it, as they are our enemies as well as the enemies

of the south; and I feel sure that no such occurrence as the one we

deplore would have taken place if all things were understood as I have

endeavored to explain them. Indeed the true meaning of our treaty is,

that we must know no line in the presence of our invader, be he who he

may....[519]

Colonel Cooper then addressed[520] the Indians and, after him, Major

Pegg;[521] but they were not convinced and many of them went home,

positively refusing to march farther with the army.

Meanwhile Cooper's call for reenforcements had reached McIntosh[522] and,

as the need seemed so urgent, McIntosh resolved to supply it and notified

Cooper to that effect. Subsequently, he decided[523] to take the field in

person and to head a column, separate from Cooper's. What induced him to

do this, nobody can well say. Cooper always felt that the incompleteness

of the victory over Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la, which was soon to come, was mainly

attributable to the divided effort of the attacking force. In the two

former engagements, Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la's force, such as it was, untrained

and miscellaneous, had greatly outnumbered the Confederate; but now the

two were more equally matched in point of numbers and the chances of

success were all on the southern side because of superior training and

equipment, so Cooper was probably correct in his conjecture. McIntosh's

excuse[524] for advancing precipitately and alone was, notwithstanding,

very reasonable. The scarcity of forage made it expedient to march

compactly; and the two generals had agreed, so McIntosh declared, when in

conference at Fort Gibson, "that either force should attack the enemy on

sight."

The privilege of attacking Opoeth-le-yo-ho-la fell, under this

arrangement, supposing it was made, to McIntosh, who had been able to push

on in advance of Cooper. The Battle of Chustenahlah was fought in the

early afternoon of December 26, 1861, and ended in what seemed the

complete defeat of the Creeks. McIntosh reported that, although their

position was strong, they were forced to retreat

To the rocky gorges amid the deep recesses of the mountains, where

they were pursued by our victorious troops and routed in every

instance with great loss. They endeavored to make a stand at their

encampment, but their efforts were ineffectual, and we were soon in

the midst of it. The battle lasted until 4 o'clock, when the firing

gradually ceased....[525]

And then the Creeks fled, leaving practically everything in the shape of

property behind them. Cooper came up and detachments of his troops pursued

them almost to the Kansas line. The weather was bitterly cold, provisions

scarce, the country rough and bleak. The pursuit took the form of a seven

day scout; but the Creeks, no matter how great their dispersion, were

headed straight for Walnut Creek, Kansas.

Their coming was anticipated. Hearing of their approach, Superintendent

Coffin had directed[526] all the agents[527] under his charge to report to

him for duty at a place on the Verdigris River called Fort Roe[528] "about

thirty-five or forty miles from Leroy and Burlington." It was Coffin's

intention to meet the refugees upon their first arrival; but, as

Commissioner Dole was expected soon to be at Fort Leavenworth, he thought

it best to wait[529] and consult with him. It does not seem to have been

recorded on just what date the first of the Indian refugees crossed the

Kansas line, but they were very soon crossing in great numbers and, by the

time Coffin finally reached them, their condition was truly pitiable. They

took up their station on the bare prairies between the Verdigris and the

Arkansas Rivers and stretched themselves in almost hopeless confusion

over about two hundred miles of country. Fortunately the land upon which

they camped was Indian land, New York Indian land, and the few white men

thereon were legally intruders and could not consistently object to the

presence of the refugees. The numbers of the refugees were variously

estimated. Starting with about forty-five hundred,[530] they increased

daily and at an astonishing rate; for the exodus of the Creeks was but the

signal for the flight of other tribesmen from Indian Territory, of all

those, in fact, who were either tired of their alliance with the

Confederacy or had never been in sympathy with it and were only too eager

to take the first chance to escape from it.

The suffering of the refugees, due to destitution and exposure, was

something horrible to think upon. Superintendent Coffin had little to give

them. He appealed to General Hunter for an allowance from the army

supplies and Hunter sent down his chief commissary of subsistence, Captain

J. W. Turner, to do what he could to relieve the distress. Hunter also

sent Brigade-surgeon A. B. Campbell; for it was not simply food and

clothing, that were needed and roof shelter, but medical attendance. As

soon as possible, cheap blankets[531] were furnished and some condemned

army tents. The journey northward had been undertaken in the bitterest of

cold weather. With a raw northwest wind beating in their faces,

And over the snow-covered roads, they travelled all night and the next

day, without halting to rest. Many of them were on foot, without

shoes, and very thinly clad.... In this condition they had

accomplished a journey of about three hundred miles; but quite a

number froze to death on the route, and their bodies with a shroud of

snow, were left where they fell to feed the hungry wolves....

Families who in their country had been wealthy, and who could count

their cattle by the thousands and horses by hundreds, and owned large

numbers of slaves, and who at home had lived at ease and comfort, were

without the necessaries of life.[532]

When, sometime in early December, Commissioner Dole heard of the

resistance that the unionist Creeks were making to Colonel Cooper, he

immediately applied once more, through the Secretary of the Interior,

to the War Department for troops sufficient to assert Federal supremacy

south of the Kansas line, his immediate object being, the strengthening of

the force then opposed to Cooper. At the moment, Lane's expedition was

under consideration, Lane having managed to convince the Washington

authorities, both congressional and administrative, that an expedition

southward was absolutely necessary[533] for the protection of the

frontier.

[Illustration: Retreat of the Loyal Indians from the Indian Country under

A-poth-yo-ho-lo in the winter of 1861 [_From Office of Indian Affairs_]]

The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy · 第 10 / 35 段