THE CHARTIST PETITION (1842).

=Source.=—_Hansard_, Third Series, lxii., col. 1373,

Monday, May 2.

[A Petition from the working classes throughout the kingdom, of the

presentation of which Mr. Thomas Duncombe had previously given notice,

was brought down to the House, by a procession consisting of a vast

multitude. Its bulk was so great, that the doors were not wide enough

to admit it, and it was necessary to unroll it, to carry it into the

House. When unrolled, it spread over a great part of the floor, and

rose above the level of the table.]

Mr. Duncombe in presenting the petition gave the following statistics

of signatures:

Manchester, 99,680; Newcastle and districts, 92,000; Glasgow and

Lanarkshire, 78,062; Halifax, 36,400; Nottingham, 40,000; Leeds,

41,000; Birmingham, 43,000; Norwich, 21,560; Bolton, 18,500; Leicester,

18,000; Rochdale, 19,600; Loughborough and districts, 10,000;

Salford, 19,600; East Riding, Yorkshire, agricultural districts,

14,840; Worcester, 10,000; Merthyr Tydvil and districts, 13,900;

Aberdeen, 17,600; Keithly, 11,000; Brighton, 12,700; Bristol, 12,800;

Huddersfield, 23,180; Sheffield, 27,200; Scotland, West Midland

districts, 18,000; Dunfermline, 16,000; Cheltenham, 10,400; Liverpool,

23,000; Stalybridge and districts, 10,000; Stockport, 14,000;

Macclesfield and suburbs, 10,000; North Lancashire, 52,000; Oldham,

15,000; Ashton, 14,200; Bradford and district, Yorkshire, 45,100;

Burnley and district, 14,000; Preston and district, 24,000; Wigan,

10,000; London and suburbs, 200,000; from 371 other towns, villages,

etc., 2,154,807. Total, 3,315,752.

The Petition was read, as follows:

To the honourable the Commons of Great Britain and Ireland, in

Parliament assembled.

The petition of the undersigned people of the United Kingdom,

Sheweth—That Government originated from, was designed to protect the

freedom and promote the happiness of, and ought to be responsible to,

the whole people.

That the only authority on which any body of men can make laws and

govern society, is delegation from the people.

That as Government was designed for the benefit and protection of, and

must be obeyed and supported by, all, therefore all should be equally

represented.

That any form of Government which fails to effect the purposes for

which it was designed, and does not fully and completely represent the

whole people, who are compelled to pay taxes to its support and obey

the laws resolved upon by it, is unconstitutional, tyrannical, and

ought to be amended or resisted.

That your honourable House, as at present constituted, has not been

elected by, and acts irresponsibly of, the people; and hitherto has

only represented parties, and benefited the few, regardless of the

miseries, grievances, and petitions of the many. Your honourable House

has enacted laws contrary to the expressed wishes of the people, and

by unconstitutional means enforced obedience to them, thereby creating

an unbearable despotism on the one hand, and degrading slavery on the

other.

That if your honourable House is of opinion that the people of Great

Britain and Ireland ought not to be fully represented, your petitioners

pray that such opinion may be unequivocally made known, that the

people may fully understand what they can or cannot expect from your

honourable House; because if such be the decision of your honourable

House, your petitioners are of opinion that where representation is

denied, taxation ought to be resisted.

That your petitioners instance, in proof of their assertion, that

your honourable House has not been elected by the people; that the

population of Great Britain and Ireland is at the present time about

twenty-six millions of persons; and that yet, out of this number,

little more than nine hundred thousand have been permitted to vote in

the recent election of representatives to make laws to govern the whole.

That the existing state of representation is not only extremely

limited and unjust, but unequally divided, and gives preponderating

influence to the landed and monied interests to the utter ruin of the

small-trading and labouring classes.

That the borough of Guildford, with a population of 3,920 returns to

Parliament as many members as the Tower Hamlets, with a population

of 300,000; Evesham, with a population of 3,998, elects as many

representatives as Manchester, with a population of 200,000; and

Buckingham, Evesham, Totness, Guildford, Honiton, and Bridport,

with a total population of 23,000, return as many representatives

as Manchester, Finsbury, Tower Hamlets, Liverpool, Marylebone, and

Lambeth, with a population of 1,400,000! these being but a very few

instances of the enormous inequalities existing in what is called the

representation of this country.

That bribery, intimidation, corruption, perjury, and riot, prevail

at all parliamentary elections, to an extent best understood by the

Members of your honourable House.

That your petitioners complain that they are enormously taxed to pay

the interest of what is termed the national debt, a debt amounting

at present to £800,000,000, being only a portion of the enormous

amount expended in cruel and expensive wars for the suppression of all

liberty, by men not authorised by the people, and who, consequently,

had not right to tax posterity for the outrages committed by them upon

mankind. And your petitioners loudly complain of the augmentation of

that debt, after twenty-six years of almost uninterrupted peace, and

whilst poverty and discontent rage over the land.

That taxation, both general and local, is at this time too enormous to

be borne; and in the opinion of your petitioners is contrary to the

spirit of the Bill of Rights, wherein it is clearly expressed that no

subject shall be compelled to contribute to any tax, talliage, or aid,

unless imposed by common consent in Parliament.

That in England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales thousands of people

are dying from actual want; and your petitioners, whilst sensible

that poverty is the great existing cause of crime, view with mingled

astonishment and alarm the ill-provision made for the poor, the aged,

and infirm; and likewise perceive, with feelings of indignation, the

determination of your honourable House to continue the Poor Law Bill in

operation, notwithstanding the many proofs which have been afforded by

sad experience of the unconstitutional principle of that Bill, of its

unchristian character, and of the cruel and murderous effects produced

upon the wages of working men and the lives of the subjects of this

realm.

That your petitioners conceive that Bill to be contrary to all previous

statutes, opposed to the spirit of the Constitution, and an actual

violation of the precepts of the Christian religion; and therefore your

petitioners look with apprehension to the results which may flow from

its continuance.

That your petitioners would direct the attention of your honourable

House to the great disparity existing between the wages of the

producing millions and the salaries of those whose comparative

usefulness ought to be questioned, where riches and luxury prevail

amongst the rulers and poverty and starvation amongst the ruled.

That your petitioners, with all due respect and loyalty, would compare

the daily income of the Sovereign Majesty with that of thousands of

the working men of this nation; and whilst your petitioners have

learned that her Majesty receives daily for her private use the sum of

£164 17s. 10d., they have also ascertained that many thousands of the

families of the labourers are only in the receipt of 3-¾d. per head

per day.

That your petitioners have also learned that his royal Highness Prince

Albert receives each day the sum of £104 2s., whilst thousands have to

exist upon 3d. per head per day.

That your petitioners have also heard with astonishment that the King

of Hanover daily receives £57 10s., whilst thousands of the tax-payers

of this Empire live upon 2-¾d. per head per day.

That your petitioners have, with pain and regret, also learned that the

Archbishop of Canterbury is daily in the receipt of £52 10s. per day,

whilst thousands of the poor have to maintain their families upon an

income not exceeding 2d. per head per day.

That, notwithstanding the wretched and unparalleled condition of the

people, your honourable House has manifested no disposition to curtail

the expenses of the State, to diminish taxation, or promote general

prosperity.

That unless immediate remedial measures be adopted, your petitioners

fear the increasing distress of the people will lead to results fearful

to contemplate; because your petitioners can produce evidence of the

gradual decline of wages, at the same time that the constant increase

of the national burdens must be apparent to all.

That your petitioners know that it is the undoubted constitutional

right of the people to meet freely, when, how, and where they choose,

in public places, peaceably, in the day, to discuss their grievances

and political or other subjects, or for the purpose of framing,

discussing, or passing any vote, petition, or remonstrance, upon any

subject whatsoever.

That your petitioners complain that the right has unconstitutionally

been infringed, and 500 well disposed persons have been arrested,

excessive bail demanded, tried by packed juries, sentenced to

imprisonment, and treated as felons of the worst description.

That an unconstitutional police force is distributed all over the

country, at enormous cost, to prevent the due exercise of the people’s

rights. And your petitioners are of opinion that the Poor-law Bastiles

and the police stations, being co-existent, have originated from the

same cause—viz., the increased desire on the part of the irresponsible

few to oppress and starve the many.

That a vast and unconstitutional army is upheld at the public expense

for the purpose of repressing public opinion in the three kingdoms, and

likewise to intimidate the millions in the due exercise of those rights

and privileges which ought to belong to them.

That your petitioners complain that the hours of labour, particularly

of the factory workers, are protracted beyond the limits of human

endurance, and that the wages earned, after unnatural application to

toil in heated and unhealthy workshops, are inadequate to sustain the

bodily strength and supply those comforts which are so imperative after

an excessive waste of physical energy.

That your petitioners also direct the attention of your honourable

House to the starvation wages of the agricultural labourer, and view

with horror and indignation the paltry income of those whose toil gives

being to the staple food of this people.

That your petitioners deeply deplore the existence of any kind of

monopoly in this nation, and whilst they unequivocally condemn the

levying of any tax upon the necessaries of life, and upon those

articles principally required by the labouring classes, they are also

sensible that the abolition of any one monopoly will never unshackle

labour from its misery until the people possess that power under

which all monopoly and oppression must cease; and your petitioners

respectfully mention the existing monopolies of the suffrage, of

paper money, of machinery, of land, of the public press, of religious

privileges, of the means of travelling and transit, and a host of other

evils too numerous to mention, all arising from class legislation, but

which your honourable House has always consistently endeavoured to

increase instead of diminish.

That your petitioners are sensible, from the numerous petitions

presented to your honourable House, that your honourable House is fully

acquainted with the grievances of the working men; and your petitioners

pray that the rights and wrongs of labour may be considered, with a

view to the protection of the one, and to the removal of the other;

because your petitioners are of the opinion that it is the worst

species of legislation which leaves the grievances of society to

be removed only by violence or revolution, both of which may be

apprehended if complaints are unattended to and petitions despised.

* * * * *

That your petitioners complain that upwards of nine millions of pounds

per annum are unjustly abstracted from them to maintain a Church

establishment from which they principally dissent; and beg to call the

attention of your honourable House to the fact that this enormous sum

is equal to, if it does not exceed, the cost of upholding Christianity

in all parts of the world beside. Your petitioners complain that it

is unjust, and not in accordance with the Christian religion, to

enforce compulsory support of religious creeds, and expensive Church

establishments, with which the people do not agree.

That your petitioners, therefore, exercising their just constitutional

right, demand that your honourable House do remedy the many gross and

manifest evils of which your petitioners complain, do immediately,

without alteration, deduction, or addition, pass into a law the

document entitled, “The People’s Charter,” which embraces the

representation of male adults, vote by ballot, annual Parliaments,

no property qualification, payment of members, and equal electoral

districts.

And that your petitioners, desiring to promote the peace of the United

Kingdom, security of property, and prosperity of commerce, seriously

and earnestly press this, their petition, on the attention of your

honourable House.

And your petitioners, etc.

Petition to be printed.

Commercial Politics (1837-1856) · 第 32 / 86 题