Byron tells us that the stars are

A beauty and a mystery, and create

In us such love and reverence from afar

That fortune, fame, power, life, have named themselves _a star_.

But might we not with equal justice say that every thing excellent and

beautiful and precious has named itself _a flower_?

If stars teach as well as shine--so do flowers. In "still small accents"

they charm "the nice and delicate ear of thought" and sweetly whisper

that "the hand that made them is divine."

The stars are the poetry of heaven--the clouds are the poetry of the

middle sky--the flowers are the poetry of the earth. The last is the

loveliest to the eye and the nearest to the heart. It is incomparably

the sweetest external poetry that Nature provides for man. Its

attractions are the most popular; its language is the most intelligible.

It is of all others the best adapted to every variety and degree of

mind. It is the most endearing, the most familiar, the most homefelt,

and congenial. The stars are for the meditation of poets and

philosophers; but flowers are not exclusively for the gifted or the

scientific; they are the property of all. They address themselves to our

common nature. They are equally the delight of the innocent little

prattler and the thoughtful sage. Even the rude unlettered rustic

betrays some feeling for the beautiful in the presence of the lovely

little community of the field and garden. He has no sympathy for the

stars: they are too mystical and remote. But the flowers as they blush

and smile beneath his eye may stir the often deeply hidden lovingness

and gentleness of his nature. They have a social and domestic aspect to

which no one with a human heart can be quite indifferent. Few can doat

upon the distant flowers of the sky as many of us doat upon the flowers

at our feet. The stars are wholly independent of man: not so the sweet

children of Flora. We tend upon and cherish them with a parental pride.

They seem especially meant for man and man for them. They often need his

kindest nursing. We place them with guardian hand in the brightest light

and the most wholesome air. We quench with liquid life their sun-raised

thirst, or shelter them from the wintry blast, or prepare and enrich

their nutritious beds. As they pine or prosper they agitate us with

tender anxieties, or thrill us with exultation and delight. In the

little plot of ground that fronts an English cottage the flowers are

like members of the household. They are of the same family. They are

almost as lovely as the children that play with them--though their happy

human associates may be amongst

The sweetest things that ever grew

Beside a human door.

The Greeks called flowers the _Festival of the eye_: and so they are:

but they are something else, and something better.

A flower is not a flower alone,

A thousand sanctities invest it.

Flowers not only touch the heart; they also elevate the soul. They bind

us not entirely to earth; though they make earth delightful. They

attract our thoughts downward to the richly embroidered ground only to

raise them up again to heaven. If the stars are the scriptures of the

sky, the flowers are the scriptures of the earth. If the stars are a

more glorious revelation of the Creator's majesty and might, the flowers

are at least as sweet a revelation of his gentler attributes. It has

been observed that

An undevout astronomer is mad.

The same thing may be said of an irreverent floriculturist, and with

equal truth--perhaps indeed with greater. For the astronomer, in some

cases, may be hard and cold, from indulging in habits of thought too

exclusively mathematical. But the true lover of flowers has always

something gentle and genial in his nature. He never looks upon his

floral-family without a sweetened smile upon his face and a softened

feeling in his heart; unless his temperament be strangely changed and

his mind disordered. The poets, who, speaking generally, are

constitutionally religious, are always delighted readers of the

flower-illumined pages of the book of nature. One of these disciples of

Flora earnestly exclaims:

Were I, O God, in churchless lands remaining

Far from all voice of teachers and divines,

My soul would find in flowers of thy ordaining

Priests, sermons, shrines

The popular little preachers of the field and garden, with their lovely

faces, and angelic language--sending the while such ambrosial incense up

to heaven--insinuate the sweetest truths into the human heart. They lead

us to the delightful conclusion that beauty is in the list of

the _utilities_--that the Divine Artist himself is _a lover of

loveliness_--that he has communicated a taste for it to his creatures

and most lavishly provided for its gratification.

Not a flower

But shows some touch, in freckle, streak or stain,

Of His unrivalled pencil. He inspires

Their balmy odours, and imparts then hues,

And bathes their eyes with nectar, and includes

In grains as countless as the sea side sands

The forms with which he sprinkles all the earth.

_Cowper_.

In the eye of Utilitarianism the flowers are but idle shows. God might

indeed have made this world as plain as a Quaker's garment, without

retrenching one actual necessary of physical existence; but He has

chosen otherwise; and no earthly potentate was ever so richly clad as

his mother earth. "Behold the lilies of the field, they spin not,

neither do they toil, yet Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like

one of these!" We are thus instructed that man was not meant to live by

bread alone, and that the gratification of a sense of beauty is equally

innocent and natural and refining. The rose is permitted to spread its

sweet leaves to the air and dedicate its beauty to the sun, in a way

that is quite perplexing to bigots and stoics and political economists.

Yet God has made nothing in vain! The Great Artist of the Universe must

have scattered his living hues and his forms of grace over the surface

of the earth for some especial and worthy purpose. When Voltaire was

congratulated on the rapid growth of his plants, he observed that "_they

had nothing else to do_." Oh, yes--they had something else to do,--they

had to adorn the earth, and to charm the human eye, and through the eye

to soften and cheer the heart and elevate the soul!

I have often wished that Lecturers on Botany, instead of confining their

instructions to the mere physiology, or anatomy, or classification or

nomenclature of their favorite science, would go more into the poetry

of it, and teach young people to appreciate the moral influences of the

floral tribes--to draw honey for the human heart from the sweet breasts

of flowers--to sip from their radiant chalices a delicious medicine for

the soul.

Flowers are frequently hallowed by associations far sweeter than their

sweetest perfume. "I am no botanist:" says Southey in a letter to Walter

Savage Landor, "but like you, my earliest and best recollections are

connected with flowers, and they always carry me back to other days.

Perhaps this is because they are the only things which affect our senses

precisely as they did in our childhood. The sweetness of the violet is

always the same; and when you rifle a rose and drink, as it were, its

fragrance, the refreshment is the same to the old man as to the boy.

Sounds recal the past in the same manner, but they do not bring with

them individual scenes like the cowslip field, or the corner of the

garden to which we have transplanted field-flowers."

George Wither has well said in commendation of his Muse:

Her divine skill taught me this;

That from every thing I saw

I could some instruction draw,

And raise pleasure to the height

By the meanest object's sight,

By the murmur of a spring

_Or the least bough's rustelling;

By a daisy whose leaves spread

Shut, when Titan goes to bed;

Or a shady bush or tree_,

She could more infuse in me

Than all Nature's beauties can

In some other wiser man.

We must not interpret the epithet _wiser_ too literally. Perhaps the

poet speaks ironically, or means by some other _wiser man_, one allied

in character and temperament to a modern utilitarian Philosopher.

Wordsworth seems to have had the lines of George Wither in his mind when

he said

Thanks to the human heart by which we live,

Thanks to its tenderness, its joys, and fears,

To me the meanest flower that blows can give

Thoughts that do often lie too deep for tears.

Thomas Campbell, with a poet's natural gallantry, has exclaimed,

Without the smile from partial Beauty won,

Oh! what were man?--a world without a sun!

Let a similar compliment be presented to the "painted populace that

dwell in fields and lead ambrosial lives." What a desert were this scene

without its flowers--it would be like the sky of night without its

stars! "The disenchanted earth" would "lose her lustre." Stars of the

day! Beautifiers of the world! Ministrants of delight! Inspirers of

kindly emotions and the holiest meditations! Sweet teachers of the

serenest wisdom! So beautiful and bright, and graceful, and fragrant--it

is no marvel that ye are equally the favorites of the rich and the poor,

of the young and the old, of the playful and the pensive!

Our country, though originally but sparingly endowed with the living

jewelry of nature, is now rich in the choicest flowers of all other

countries.

Foreigners of many lands,

They form one social shade, as if convened

By magic summons of the Orphean lyre.

_Cowper_.

These little "foreigners of many lands" have been so skilfully

acclimatized and multiplied and rendered common, that for a few

shillings an English peasant may have a parterre more magnificent than

any ever gazed upon by the Median Queen in the hanging gardens of

Babylon. There is no reason, indeed, to suppose that even the first

parents of mankind looked on finer flowers in Paradise itself than are

to be found in the cottage gardens that are so thickly distributed over

the hills and plains and vallies of our native land.

The red rose, is the red rose still, and from the lily's cup

An odor fragrant as at first, like frankincense goes up.

_Mary Howitt_.

Our neat little gardens and white cottages give to dear old England that

lovely and cheerful aspect, which is so striking and attractive to her

foreign visitors. These beautiful signs of a happy political security

and individual independence and domestic peace and a love of order and a

homely refinement, are scattered all over the land, from sea to sea.

When Miss Sedgwick, the American authoress, visited England, nothing so

much surprised and delighted her as the gay flower-filled gardens of our

cottagers. Many other travellers, from almost all parts of the world,

have experienced and expressed the same sensations on visiting our

shores, and it would be easy to compile a voluminous collection of their

published tributes of admiration. To a foreign visitor the whole country

seems a garden--in the words of Shakespeare--"a _sea-walled garden_."

In the year 1843, on a temporary return to England after a long Indian

exile, I travelled by railway for the first time in my life. As I glided

on, as smoothly as in a sledge, over the level iron road, with such

magical rapidity--from the pretty and cheerful town of Southampton to

the greatest city of the civilized world--every thing was new to me, and

I gave way to child-like wonder and child-like exultation.[002] What a

quick succession of lovely landscapes greeted the eye on either side?

What a garden-like air of universal cultivation! What beautiful smooth

slopes! What green, quiet meadows! What rich round trees, brooding over

their silent shadows! What exquisite dark nooks and romantic lanes! What

an aspect of unpretending happiness in the clean cottages, with their

little trim gardens! What tranquil grandeur and rural luxury in the

noble mansions and glorious parks of the British aristocracy! How the

love of nature thrilled my heart with a gentle and delicious agitation,

and how proud I felt of my dear native land! It is, indeed, a fine thing

to be an Englishman. Whether at home or abroad, he is made conscious of

the claims of his country to respect and admiration. As I fed my eyes on

the loveliness of Nature, or turned to the miracles of Art and Science

on every hand, I had always in my mind a secret reference to the effect

which a visit to England must produce upon an intelligent and observant

foreigner.

Heavens! what a goodly prospect spreads around

Of hills and dales and woods and lawns and spires,

And glittering towns and gilded streams, 'till all

The stretching landscape into smoke decays!

Happy Brittannia! where the Queen of Arts,

Inspiring vigor, Liberty, abroad

Walks unconfined, even to thy farthest cots,

And scatters plenty with unsparing hand.

_Thomson_.

And here let me put in a word in favor of the much-abused English

climate. I cannot echo the unpatriotic discontent of Byron when he

speaks of

The cold and cloudy clime

Where he was born, but where he would not die.

Rather let me say with the author of "_The Seasons_," in his address to

England.

Rich is thy soil and merciful thy clime.

King Charles the Second when he heard some foreigners condemning our

climate and exulting in their own, observed that in his opinion that was

the best climate in which a man could be out in the open air with

pleasure, or at least without trouble and inconvenience, the most days

of the year and the most hours of the day; and this he held was the case

with the climate of England more than that of any other country in

Europe. To say nothing of the lovely and noble specimens of human nature

to which it seems so congenial, I may safely assert that it is

peculiarly favorable, with, rare exceptions, to the sweet children of

Flora. There is no country in the world in which there are at this day

such innumerable tribes of flowers. There are in England two thousand

varieties of the rose alone, and I venture to express a doubt whether

the richest gardens of Persia or Cashmere could produce finer specimens

of that universal favorite than are to be found in some of the small but

highly cultivated enclosures of respectable English rustics.

The actual beauty of some of the commonest flowers in our gardens can be

in no degree exaggerated--even in the daydreams of the most inspired

poet. And when the author of Lalla Rookh talks so musically and

pleasantly of the fragrant bowers of Amberabad, the country of Delight,

a Province in Jinnistan or Fairy Land, he is only thinking of the

shrubberies and flower-beds at Sloperton Cottage, and the green hills

and vales of Wiltshire.

Sir William Temple observes that "besides the temper of our climate

there are two things particular to us, that contribute much to the

beauty and elegance of our gardens--which are, _the gravel of our walks

and the fineness and almost perpetual greenness of our turf_."

"The face of England is so beautiful," says Horace Walpole, "that I do

not believe that Tempe or Arcadia was half so rural; for both lying in

hot climates must have wanted _the moss of our gardens_." Meyer, a

German, a scientific practical gardener, who was also a writer on

gardening, and had studied his art in the Royal Gardens at Paris, and

afterwards visited England, was a great admirer of English Gardens, but

despaired of introducing our style of gardening into Germany, _chiefly

on account of its inferior turf for lawns_. "Lawns and gravel walks,"

says a writer in the _Quarterly Review_, "are the pride of English

Gardens," "The smoothness and verdure of our lawns," continues the same

writer, "is the first thing in our gardens that catches the eye of a

foreigner; the next is the fineness and firmness of our gravel walks."

Mr. Charles Mackintosh makes the same observation. "In no other country

in the world," he says, "do such things exist." Mrs. Stowe, whose _Uncle

Tom_ has done such service to the cause of liberty in America, on her

visit to England seems to have been quite as much enchanted with our

scenery, as was her countrywoman, Miss Sedgwick. I am pleased to find

Mrs. Stowe recognize the superiority of English landscape-gardening and

of our English verdure. She speaks of, "the princely art of

landscape-gardening, for which England is so famous," and of "_vistas of

verdure and wide sweeps of grass, short, thick, and vividly green_ as the

velvet moss sometimes seen growing on rocks in new England." "Grass," she

observes, "is an art and a science in England--it is an institution. The

pains that are taken in sowing, tending, cutting, clipping, rolling and

otherwise nursing and coaxing it, being seconded by the often-falling

tears of the climate, produce results which must be seen to be

appreciated." This is literally true: any sight more inexpressibly

exquisite than that of an English lawn in fine order is what I am quite

unable to conceive.[003]

I recollect that in one of my visits to England, (in 1827) I attempted

to describe the scenery of India to William Hazlitt--not the living son

but the dead father. Would that he were still in the land of the living

by the side of his friend Leigh Hunt, who has been pensioned by the

Government for his support of that cause for which they were both so

bitterly persecuted by the ruling powers in days gone by. I flattered

myself into the belief that Hazlitt was interested in some of my

descriptions of Oriental scenes. What moved him most was an account of

the dry, dusty, burning, grassless plains of Bundelcund in the hot

season. I told him how once while gasping for breath in a hot verandah

and leaning over the rails I looked down upon the sun-baked ground.

"A change came o'er the spirit of my dream."

I suddenly beheld with all the distinctness of reality the rich, cool,

green, unrivalled meads of England. But the vision soon melted away, and

I was again in exile. I wept like a child. It was like a beautiful

mirage of the desert, or one of those waking dreams of home which have

sometimes driven the long-voyaging seaman to distraction and urged him

by an irresistible impulse to plunge headlong into the ocean.

When I had once more crossed the wide Atlantic--and (not by the

necromancy of imagination but by a longer and more tedious transit)

found myself in an English meadow,--I exclaimed with the poet,

Thou art free

My country! and 'tis joy enough and pride

For one hour's perfect bliss, _to tread the grass

Of England once again_.

I felt my childhood for a time renewed, and was by no means disposed to

second the assertion that

"Nothing can bring back the hour

Of splendour in the grass, of glory in the flower."

I have never beheld any thing more lovely than scenery

characteristically English; and Goldsmith, who was something of a

traveller, and had gazed on several beautiful countries, was justified

in speaking with such affectionate admiration of our still more

beautiful England,

Where lawns extend that scorn Arcadian pride.

It is impossible to put into any form of words the faintest

representation of that delightful summer feeling which, is excited in

fine weather by the sight of the mossy turf of our country. It is sweet

indeed to go,

Musing through the _lawny_ vale:

alluded to by Warton, or over Milton's "level downs," or to climb up

Thomson's

Stupendous rocks

That from the sun-redoubling valley lift

Cool to the middle air their _lawny_ tops.

It gives the Anglo-Indian Exile the heart-ache to think of these

ramblings over English scenes.

Flowers and Flower-Gardens With an Appendix of Practical Instructions and Useful Information Respecting the Anglo-Indian Flower-Garden · 第 11 / 183 题