Part of the Cotentin then is a true peninsula, a peninsula stretching

out a long finger to the north-west in the shape of Cape La Hague; and

this most characteristic part of the land has impressed a kind of

peninsular character on the whole region. But we must not forget that

the land of Coutances is not wholly peninsular, but also partly insular.

The Norman islands, those fragments of the duchy which remained faithful

to their natural Duke when the mainland passed under the yoke of Paris,

are essential parts of the Constantine land, diocese and county. Modern

arrangements have transferred their ecclesiastical allegiance to the

church of Winchester, and their civil allegiance to the Empire of India;

but historically those islands are that part of the land of Coutances

which remained Norman while the rest stooped to become French.[27] The

peninsula pointing northwards, with its neighbouring islands, save that

the islands lie to the west and not to the east, might pass for no inapt

figure of the northern land of the Dane. They formed a land which the

Dane was, by a kind of congruity, called on to make his own. And his

own he made it and thoroughly. Added to the Norman duchy by William

Longsword before Normans had wholly passed into Frenchmen, with the good

seed watered again by a new settlement straight from Denmark under

Harold Blaatand, the Danish land of Coutances, like the Saxon land of

Bayeux, was far slower than the lands beyond the Dive in putting on the

speech and the outward garb of France. And no part of the Norman duchy

sent forth more men or mightier, to put off that garb in the kindred, if

conquered, island, and to come back to their natural selves in the form

of Englishmen. The most Teutonic part of Normandy was the one part which

had a real grievance to avenge on Englishmen; in their land, and in

their land alone, had Englishmen, for a moment in the days of AEthelred,

shown themselves as invaders and ravagers. But before the men of the

Cotentin could show themselves as avengers at Senlac, they had first to

be themselves overthrown at Val-es-dunes. Before William could conquer

England, he had first to conquer his own duchy by the aid of France.

Bayeux and Coutances were to have no share in the spoil of York and

Winchester till they had been themselves subdued by the joint might of

Rouen and Paris.

It is singular enough that the two most prominent names among those

which connect the Bessin and the Cotentin with England should be those

of their two Bishops, Geoffrey of Mowbray, for a while Earl of

Northumberland, and the more famous Odo, Bishop of Bayeux and Earl of

Kent. Geoffrey would deserve a higher fame than he wins by the

possession of endless manors in Domesday and by the suppression of the

West-Saxon revolt at Montacute,[28] if we could believe that, according

to a legend which is even now hardly exploded, the existing church of

Coutances is his work. William of Durham and Roger of Salisbury would

seem feeble workers in the building art beside the man who consecrated

that building in the purest style of the thirteenth century in the year

1056. According to that theory, art must have been at Coutances a

hundred and fifty years in advance of the rest of the world, and, after

about a hundred and twenty years, the rest of the world must have begun

a series of rude attempts at imitating the long-neglected model. But

without attributing to the art of Coutances or the Cotentin so

miraculous a development as this, the district was at all times fertile

in men who could build in the styles of their several ages. A journey

through the peninsula shows its scenery, so varied and in many parts so

rich, adorned by a succession of great buildings worthy of the land in

which they are placed. The great haven of the district is indeed more

favoured by nature than by art. In the name of Cherbourg mediaeval

etymologists fondly saw an Imperial name yet older than that which is

borne by the whole district, and the received Latin name is no other

than _Caesaris Burgus_. Yet it is far more likely that the name of

Cherbourg is simply the same as our own Scarborough, and that it is so

called from the rocky hills, the highest ground in the whole district,

which look down on the fortified harbour, and are themselves condemned

to help in its fortification. The rocks and the valley between them are

worthy of some better office than to watch over an uninteresting town

which has neither ancient houses to show nor yet handsome modern

streets. The chief church, though not insignificant, is French and not

Norman, and so teaches the wrong lesson to an Englishman who begins his

Cotentin studies at this point. But, four miles or so to the west, he

will find a building which is French only if we are to apply that name

to what runs every chance of being prae-Norman, the work of a day when

Rolf and William Longsword had not yet dismembered the French duchy. On

a slight eminence overhanging the sea stands Querqueville, with its

older and its newer, its lesser and its greater, church, the two

standing side by side, and with the outline of the greater--the same

triapsidal form marking both--clearly suggested by the smaller. Of the

smaller, which is very small indeed, one can hardly doubt that parts

at least are primitive Romanesque, as old as any one chooses. It is the

fellow of the little church of Montmajeur near Arles, but far ruder. But

at Querqueville the name is part of the argument; the building gives its

name to the place. The first syllable of Querqueville is plainly the

Teutonic _kirk_; and it suggests that it got the name from this church

having been left standing when most of its neighbours were destroyed in

the Scandinavian inroads which created Normandy. The building has gone

through several changes; the upper part of its very lofty tower is

clearly a late addition, but the ground-plan, and so much of the walls

as show the herring-bone work, are surely remains of a building older

than the settlement of Rolf.

[Illustration: Valognes Church, N.E.]

From the rocks of the Norman _Scarborough_, one of the only two railways

which find their way into the Cotentin will carry the traveller through

a district whose look, like that of so much of this side of Normandy, is

thoroughly English, to Valognes, with its endless fragments of old

domestic architecture, remnants of the days when Valognes was a large

and aristocratic town, and with its church, where the architect has

ventured, not wholly without success, on the bold experiment of giving

its central parts the shape of a Gothic cupola. Is its effect improved

or spoiled--it certainly is made stranger and more striking--by its

grouping with a spire of late date immediately at its side? There is

much to please at Valognes; but when we remember the part which the town

plays in the history of the Conqueror, that it was from hence, one of

his favourite dwelling-places, that he took the headlong ride which

carried him away safely from the rebellious peninsula before

Val-es-dunes, we are inclined to grumble that all that now shows itself

in the place itself is of far later date. The castle is clean gone; and

the traveller to whom Normandy is chiefly attractive in its Norman

aspect may perhaps sacrifice the Roman remains of Alleaume if the choice

lies between them and a full examination of the castle and abbey of

Saint Saviour on the Douve, _Saint-Sauveur-le-Vicomte_, the home of the

two Neals, the centre, in the days of the second of the rebellions which

caused William to ride so hard from Valognes to Rye.[29] A

characteristic church or two, among them Colomby, with its long lancets,

may be taken on the way; but the great object of the journey is where

the little town of Saint Saviour lies on its slope, with the castle on

the one hand, the abbey on the other, rising above the river at its

feet. The abbey, Neal's abbey, where his monks supplanted an earlier

foundation of canons, has gone through many ups and downs. Its

Romanesque plan remained untouched through a great reconstruction of its

upper part in the later Gothic. It fell into ruin at the Revolution,

but one side of the nave and the central saddle-backed tower still

stood, and now the ruin is again a perfect church, where Sisters of

Mercy have replaced the monks of Saint Benedict. Here then a great part

of the work of the ancient lords remains; with the castle which should

be their most direct memorial the case is less clear. Besides round

towers--one great one specially which some one surely must have set down

as Phoenician--the great feature is the huge square tower which forms

the main feature of the building, and which has thoroughly the air of a

Norman keep of the eleventh or twelfth century. But when we come nearer,

there is hardly a detail--round arches of course alone prove

nothing--which does not suggest a later time. And the tower is

attributed to Sir John Chandos, who held the castle in Edward the

Third's time. Did he most ingeniously recast every detail of an elder

keep, or did he choose to build exactly according to the type of an age

long before his own? Anyhow, as far as general effect goes, the tower

thoroughly carries us back to the days of the earlier fame of Saint

Saviour. The view from its top stretches far away over the peninsula of

which it was once the citadel to the backs of the hills which look down

on Cherbourg and the sea, the sea which, if we believe the tale, bore

the fleet of AEthelred when the elder Neal drove back English invaders

more than three hundred years before Sir John Chandos.

[Illustration: Abbey of Lessay, S.W.]

The visitor to Saint Saviour may perhaps manage to make his way straight

from that place to Coutances without going back to Valognes. In any case

his main object between Saint Saviour and Coutances will be the great

Romanesque abbey of Lessay; only, by going back to Valognes and taking

the railway to Carentan, he will be able to combine with Lessay the two

very fine churches of Carentan and Periers. Of these, Carentan has

considerable Romanesque portions, the arches of the central lantern and

the pillars of the nave which have been ingeniously lengthened and made

to bear pointed arches. Lessay, we fancy, is very little known. It is

out of the way, and the country round about it, flat and dreary, is

widely different from the generally rich, and often beautiful, scenery

of the district. But few churches of its own class surpass it as an

example of an almost untouched Norman minster, not quite of the first

class in point of scale. We say untouched, because it is so practically,

though a good deal of the vaulting was most ingeniously repaired after

the English wars, just as Saint Stephen at Caen was after the Huguenot

wars. Some miles over the _landes_ bring us again into the hilly region

round the episcopal city, and Coutances is seen on its hill, truly a

city which cannot be hid. Of its lovely minster we once spoke in some

detail;[30] of the city itself we may add that none more truly bespeaks

its origin as a hill-fort. The hill is of no extraordinary height; but

it is thoroughly isolated, not forming part of a range like the hills of

Avranches and Le Mans. And, saving the open place before the

cathedral--perhaps the forum of Constantia--there is not a flat yard of

ground in Coutances. The church itself is on a slope; you walk up the

incline of one street and see the houses sloping down the incline of the

other. In the valley on the west side of the city is a singular

curiosity, several of the arches of a mediaeval aqueduct.[31] Pointed

arches, and buttresses against the piers, are what we are not used to in

such buildings. A road by a few small churches leads to Granville on its

peninsula, with its strange church where Flamboyant and _Renaissance_

die away into a kind of Romanesque most unlike that of Ragusa, and the

Cotentin has been gone through from north to south. The modern

department and the modern diocese go on further; but the "pagus

Constantinus" is now done with; the land of Avranches, the march against

the Breton, has a history of its own.

THE AVRANCHIN

1876

The town of Avranches is well known as one of those Continental spots on

which Englishmen have settled down and formed a kind of little colony. A

colony of this kind has two aspects in the eyes of the traveller who

lights upon it. On the one hand, it is a nuisance to find one's self, on

sitting down to a _table-d'hote_ in a foreign town, in the middle of

ordinary English chatter. Full of the particular part of the world in

which he is, the traveller may hear all parts of the world discussed

from some purely personal or professional aspect, without a single

original observation to add anything to his stock of ideas. On the other

hand, it must be allowed that the presence of an English settlement

anywhere always brings with it a degree of civilisation in many points

such as is not always found in towns of much greater size which our

countrymen do not frequent. But to the historical traveller Avranches is

almost dead. A few stones heaped together are all that remains of the

cathedral, and another stone marks the sight of the north door where

Henry the Second received absolution for his share in the murder of

Thomas. The city which formed the halting-place of Lanfranc on his way

from Pavia to Bec is now chiefly to be noticed for its splendid site,

and as a convenient starting-point for other places where more has been

spared. Avranches, like Coutances, is a hill-city, and, as regards

actual elevation, it is even more of a hill-city than Coutances. But

then the hill of Coutances is an isolated hill, while Avranches stands

on the projecting bluff of a range. Seen from the sands of Saint

Michael's Bay, the site proclaims itself as one which, before the fall

of its chief ornament, must have been glorious beyond words. It might

have been Laon, as it were, with, at favourable tides at least, the

estuary washing the foot of its hill. What the view is from the height

itself is implied in what has just been said. The bay, with the

consecrated Mount and the smaller Tombelaine by its side, the Breton

coast stretching far away, the Mount of Dol coming, perhaps within the

range of sight, certainly within the range of ideas, the goodly land on

either side of the city, the woods, the fields--for in the Avranchin we

are still in a land of pasture and hedgerows--all tell us that it was no

despicable heritage of his own to which Hugh of Avranches added his

palatine earldom of Chester. And if Avranches gave a lord to one great

district of England, England presently gave a lord to Avranches. The

Avranchin formed part of the fief of the AEtheling Henry, the fief so

often lost and won again, but where men had at least some moments of

order under the stern rule of the Lion of Justice, while the rest of

Normandy in the days of Robert was torn in pieces by the feuds of rival

lords and countesses. But musings of this kind would be more to the

point if the city itself had something more to show than a tower or two

of no particular importance--if, in short, the hill of Avranches was

crowned by such a diadem of spires and cupolas as the hill of Coutances.

As it is, Avranches is less attractive in itself than it is as the best

point for several excursions in the Avranchin land. The excursion to the

famous Mount of Saint Michael and its fortified abbey need not here be

dwelled on. No one can walk five minutes in the streets of Avranches

without being reminded that the city is the starting-place for "le mont

Saint-Michel." But no one suggests a visit to Saint James nor even to

Mortain and its waterfalls. Nor should we ourselves suggest a visit to

Saint James, except to those who may be satisfied with a beautiful bit

of natural scenery, heightened by the thought that the spot is directly

connected with the memory of William, indirectly with that of Harold.

When we write "Saint James," we are not translating.[32] The "castrum

sancti Jacobi" appears as "Saint James" in Wace, and it is "Saint James"

to this day alike in speech and in writing. The fact is worthy of some

notice in the puzzling history of the various forms of the apostolic

names Jacobus and Johannes and their diminutives. _Jacques_ and _Jack_

must surely be the same; how then came _Jack_ to be the diminutive of

_John_? Anyhow this Norman fortress bears the name of the Saint of

Compostela in a form chiefly familiar in Britain and Aragon, though it

is not without a cognate in the Italian _Giacomo_. The English forms of

apostolic names are sometimes borne even now by Romance-speaking owners,

as M. James Fazy and M. John Lemoinne bear witness. But here the name is

far too old for any imitative process of this kind. And it is only as

applied to the place itself that the form "James"[33] is used; the inn

is the "Hotel Saint-Jacques," and "Saint-Jacques" is the acknowledged

patron of the parish. Anyhow the effect is to give the name of the place

an unexpectedly English air. Perhaps such an air is not wholly out of

place in the name of a spot which was fortified against the Breton by a

prince who was to become King of the English, and whose fortification

led to a war in which two future and rival Kings of the English fought

side by side.

For the castle of Saint James was one of the fortresses raised by

William's policy to strengthen the Norman frontier against the

_Bret-Welsh_ of Gaul, just as in after days he and his Earls raised

fortresses on English ground to strengthen the English frontier against

the _Bret-Welsh_ of Britain. It stands very near to the border, and we

can well understand how its building might give offence to the Breton

Count Conan, and so lead to the war in which William and Harold marched

together across the sands which surround the consecrated Mount. In this

way Saint James plays an indirect part in English history, and it plays

another when it was one of the first points of his lost territory to be

won back by Henry the AEtheling after his brothers had driven him out of

the Mount and all else that he had.[34] But the place keeps hardly

anything but its memories and the natural beauty of its site. A steep

peninsular hill looks down on a narrow and wooded valley with a

_beck_--that is the right word in the land which contains Caude_bec_ and

_Bec_ Herlouin--running round its base. The church--a strange modern

building with some ancient portions used up again--stands on the extreme

point of the promontory. This seems the best point for commanding the

whole valley, and we may perhaps guess that a less devout prince than

William would not have scrupled to raise his donjon at least within the

consecrated precinct. But he chose the southern side of the hill, the

side to be sure most directly looking towards the enemy; and church and

castle stood side by side on the hill without interfering with each

other. But the visitor to Saint James--if Saint James should ever get

any visitors--must take care not to ask for the _chateau_. If he does,

he will be sent to the other side of the valley, to a modern house, on a

lovely site certainly, and working in some portions of mediaeval work,

but which has nothing to do with the castle of the Conqueror. The name

for that, so far as it keeps a name, is "le _fort_." The open space by

the church is the "place du Fort," and the inquirer will soon find that

on the south the hill-side is scarped and strengthened by a wall. That

is all that is left of the castle of Saint James; but it is enough to

call up memories of days which, from an English as well as from a local

point of view, are worth remembering.

COUTANCES AND SAINT-LO

1891

Geoffrey of Mowbray, Bishop of Coutances, appears once in Domesday as

Bishop of Saint-Lo, but it must not therefore be thought that he had his

bishopstool in the town so called, or that the great church of Saint-Lo

was ever the spiritual head of the peninsular land of Coutances. There

is indeed every opportunity for confusion on the subject. The Bishops of

Coutances were lords of Saint-Lo in the present department of La Manche;

but, so far as they were Bishops of Saint-Lo at all, it was of quite

another Saint-Lo, namely, of a church so called in the city of Rouen.

There, when the Cotentin was over-run by the still heathen Northmen, the

Bishops of Coutances took refuge, carrying with them Saint-Lo

himself--_Sanctus Laudus_, a predecessor in the bishopric--in the form

of his relics. When heathen Northmen were turned into Christian Normans,

the Bishops of Coutances went home again, but the title which they had

picked up on their travels seems to have stuck to them. As they had to

do with two things, both called Saint-Lo, as well as with their own

city, the error of speech was not wonderful. But, setting aside times of

havoc, when there was nothing left to be head of, Coutances always

remained the formal head, ecclesiastical and civil, of the Cotentin, the

"pagus Constantinus," which took its name from the city. The town of

Saint-Lo has now outstripped Coutances in the matter of temporal honour

as the head of the department of La Manche, though that dignity was not

assigned to it without a good deal of opposition on the part of the

elder seat of rule. The same series of changes gave to ecclesiastical

Coutances, if not a higher dignity, at least a wider jurisdiction. When

the episcopal church of Coutances, after being put to various strange

uses in the revolutionary time, became once more a place of Christian

worship and the head church of the diocese, that diocese was enlarged by

the ecclesiastical territory of Avranches. Avranches and Lisieux have

both vanished from the roll of the six suffragans of the Archbishop of

Rouen, Primate of Normandy. But Avranches has suffered worse things than

Lisieux. The Lexovian bishopstool has passed away; but the church that

held it is still there. From Avranches the church itself has vanished.

It is from its site only that we look down on the wide plain at our

foot, on the Mount of the Archangel in its bay, and the rocks of

Cancale beyond.[35]

There is no need to describe anew a building so well known as the

cathedral church of Coutances. There is no need to argue against, there

is hardly need to wonder at, the strange belief against which Gally

Knight and others had to fight, that this beautiful example of the fully

developed Early Gothic was really the work of that Bishop Geoffrey who

blessed the Norman host on its march from Hastings to Senlac.[36] That

belief was indeed a strange one. It implied that some nameless genius at

Coutances had, in the middle of the eleventh century, suddenly, at a

blow, invented the fully developed style of the thirteenth--that this

great discovery was kept hidden at Coutances till the very end of the

twelfth--that then various people in Normandy, France, England, and

above all Saint Hugh of Burgundy, began to make many, and at first not

very successful, attempts to imitate what the men of one spot in the

Cotentin had known, and must have been proud of, for a century and a

half. The local invention of Perpendicular at Gloucester, and its

spreading abroad by the great Bishops of Winchester forty or fifty years

later, is a remarkable fact; but it is a small matter to this fiction.

So strange a vagary need no longer be discussed; but it is worthy of a

place in the memory among odd delusions. As an honest delusion, it is at

least more respectable than making Alfred found things at Oxford and

Ripon.

[Illustration: Notre-Dame, Saint-Lo, S.E.]

Sketches of Travel in Normandy and Maine · 第 4 / 13 段