The deep porch which we so frequently see over the principal

Produced by David Wilson

ECCLESIASTICAL CURIOSITIES.

[Illustration: _From a Photo by A. H. Pitcher, Gloucester._

PORCH, GLOUCESTER CATHEDRAL.]

Ecclesiastical

Curiosities

Edited by

William Andrews

LONDON:

WILLIAM ANDREWS & CO., 5, FARRINGDON AVENUE, E.C.

1899.

[Illustration: William Andrews & Co

The Hull Press]

Preface.

This volume is on similar lines to some of my previously published

works, and I trust it will be equally well received by the public and

the press.

William Andrews.

The Hull Press,

_December 1st, 1898._

Contents.

PAGE

The Church Door. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, B.A. 1

Sacrificial Foundations. By England Howlett 30

The Building of the English Cathedrals. By the Rev.

Geo. S. Tyack, B.A. 46

Ye Chappell of Oure Ladye. By the Rev. J. H. Stamp 76

Some Famous Spires. By John T. Page 101

The Five of Spades and the Church of Ashton-under-Lyne.

By John Eglington Bailey, F.S.A. 113

Bells and their Messages. By Edward Bradbury 119

Stories about Bells. By J. Potter Briscoe, F.R.H.S. 133

Concerning Font-Lore. By the Rev. P. Oakley Hill 145

Watching-Chambers in Churches. By the Rev. Geo. S.

Tyack, B.A. 153

Church Chests. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, B.A. 161

An Antiquarian Problem: The Leper Window. By William

White, F.S.A. 183

Mazes. By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, B.A. 186

Churchyard Superstitions. By the Rev. Theodore Johnson 206

Curious Announcements in the Church. By the Rev. R.

Wilkins Rees 216

Big Bones Preserved in Churches. By the Rev. R. Wilkins

Rees 230

Samuel Pepys at Church. 244

Ecclesiastical Curiosities.

The Church Door.

By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, B.A.

That first impressions have no small influence in moulding the opinions

of most people can scarcely be denied; and therefore in our estimate of

the architectural value of a church the door is an element of some

importance. A shabby and undignified entrance raises no expectations of

a lofty and solemn interior; and that interior must be emphatically

fine, if we are not to read into it some of the meanness of its portal.

On the other hand, though the church be but plain and simple--so that

it lack not a measure of the dignity which may well accompany

simplicity--our thoughts will be raised and fitted to find in it

something worthy of its high purpose, if we have been prepared by

passing through a noble porch, and beneath a doorway that speaks itself

the entrance to no ordinary dwelling.

[Illustration: DOOR AT CROWLE CHURCH.]

In primitive times the approach to a church must have been full of

dignity, the worshippers being warned, by successive gates and doors, of

the sacredness of the building which they were about to enter. Eusebius

gives us a full account of a splendid church built at Tyre by Paulinus,

from which we may gather the plan on which such buildings were erected

in the primitive ages, when the means were forthcoming, and no

opposition from the heathen world prevented.

The whole church at Tyre and its precincts were enclosed within a wall,

at the front of which was a stately porch, known as the "great porch,"

or the "first entrance." Passing through this the worshipper entered the

courtyard, or _atrium_, round which ran a covered portico, or cloister,

and in the centre of which was a fountain, or cistern, of water.

Opposite the "great porch" was the door into the church itself; at Tyre

there were (as in many of our cathedrals) three such doors, a large one

in the centre, flanked by smaller ones at some distance along the wall.

These opened into a vestibule, or ante-temple, from which admittance was

gained into the nave of the church by yet another door or gate.

Each of the spaces formed by these several barriers had its special use.

Within the _atrium_ all the worshippers washed their hands as a

preparation, both literal and emblematic, for assisting in the sacred

mysteries; here, too, penitents under censure for the most flagrant sins

remained during the divine offices, and besought the prayers of their

brethren as they passed on to those holier courts, from which for a time

they were themselves excluded. Within this open courtyard, also, as in a

modern churchyard, burials were sometimes permitted. The portico beyond

the second entrance was the place for the "hearers," that is for those

who were not yet sufficiently instructed in the faith to be allowed to

be present except at the reading of the Scriptures and the sermons

(these were catechumens in their noviciate and the heathens and Jews),

and also for those Christians who were degraded temporarily to the same

position as a penance for some sin. Beyond this portico, the nave was

still further divided for the separation of different orders of

penitents; so that the faithful in possession of all their privileges

had quite a number of doors or gates through which to pass before

reaching that place, immediately outside the apse, or chancel, which it

was their right to occupy.

In order that the several classes of persons attending church might be

kept strictly within those portions of the building which were assigned

to them, a special order of door-keepers existed in the Church. The keys

of the church were solemnly delivered to these _ostiarii_, and they were

accounted to form the lowest in rank of the minor orders. The simple

words of the commission, uttered by the bishop to the _ostiarius_, were,

"Behave thyself as one that must give an account to God of the things

that are kept under these keys." Such was the formula prescribed by the

fourth Council of Carthage (398 A.D.), and found in the Roman ritual of

the eighth century. This order of clergy was almost confined to the

west, however; we find traces of its existence at one time at

Constantinople, but for the most part the deacons guarded the men's

entrance, and sub-deacons or deaconesses the women's, in the east.

[Illustration: WEST DOOR, HOLY TRINITY, COLCHESTER.]

In the earliest English churches the entrance was of a very simple

nature; for the artistic skill of the people was small, and their ideals

were unambitious. The buildings consisted of a nave without clerestory,

and a chancel; the door being placed in the centre of the western wall.

A curious example of such a door meets us at Holy Trinity, Colchester,

although in this case it gives admittance not into the nave directly,

but through the ancient tower. This tower, the oldest part of the

church, has been constructed of the fragments of buildings older still;

the Roman bricks of the ruined city of Camulodunum having been used to

form it. In the western side is a narrow doorway, contained by two

square shafts with very simple capitals, and having a triangular head

with an equally simple moulding by way of drip-stone. The date is

supposed to be between 800 and 1000 A.D. A church perhaps yet older is

that of S. Lawrence at Bradford-on-Avon, which has a good claim to be

the veritable structure reared by S. Aldhelm in the first years of the

eighth century. Here there is a northern porch of unusual size in

proportion to the rest of the building; the entrance to which is by

means of an arched doorway, tall and narrow. The narrowness of some of

these ancient doorways is remarkable. At Sowerford-Keynes is one, now

built up, which, though nearly nine feet high, is but 1 foot 9 inches

wide at the springing of the arch, widening towards the base to 2 feet

51/2 inches. The jambs are of "short and long" work, and the abacus has a

very simple zig-zag moulding. The arch itself is not built up, but

carved out of one stone, which is cut square on the upper side and

scooped into a parabolic curve on the lower. A double row of cable

moulding decorates it. This, which has been called "one of the most

characteristic specimens of Saxon architecture in England," was the

northern entrance to the church. Another instance of a western door of

simple design is supplied by Crowle, or Croule, in north Lincolnshire.

Here we meet with a rectangular doorway, the top of which is formed of

one long stone, on which is some antique carving and a fragment of a

runic inscription.[1] Above this is a tympanum filled with

diamond-shaped stones of small size.

[Footnote 1: See a full account of this stone in "Bygone

Lincolnshire,"--Vol. I, William Andrews & Co.]

With the rise of the so-called Norman style of architecture the doors of

our churches took a handsomer form; and as the churches themselves were

now formed on a larger and nobler plan, more than one entrance was often

required. The usual door for the people was now commonly placed at the

south side, except in churches connected (as were so many of our

cathedrals) with monastic foundations. In this latter case the south

side was generally occupied by the cloisters and other conventual

buildings, and the people's door was therefore placed upon the north

side. At this period, too, the church-porch begins its development; for,

although porches in a strict sense were at any rate not usual, the

door-way deeply sunk in the massive wall and protected by three, four,

or even more concentric arches, suggests the more fully developed

shelter of the porch. Of doors of this kind any of our older

abbey-churches will supply adequate, and often splendid, examples. The

great north door of Durham Cathedral, and the smaller, but not less

beautiful doors into the cloisters there, are fine instances. The west

and north doors of the little cathedral of Llandaff supply examples in

another class of building; and even small and obscure parish churches

are sometimes dignified with the possession of an entrance full of the

massive solemnity of this Norman work. The village church of Heysham, on

Morecambe Bay, has a south door well worthy of mention in this

connection; and the Lincolnshire church already cited, Crowle, has an

interesting doorway of this kind.

As art progressed in Christendom, and exhibited its growing force

especially in the churches, the entrances thereto shared in the

increasing splendour of the whole. The mouldings of the arches and the

pillars, the elaboration of capitals and bases, all showed the evidence

of devotion guided by taste and skill. And often something more than

mere decoration was attempted; the opportunity was seized to add

instruction, and figures of saints and angels, or complete scenes from

scriptural or ecclesiastical story, filled the expanse of the tympanum

or the niches of the columns. About the twelfth century, also, it became

customary to divide the main entrance into two by means of a pillar, or

a group of pillars; the two-leaved door being thus made symbolical of

the two natures of Christ, of Whom, as Durandus tells us, it is itself

the emblem, "according to that saying in the Gospel, 'I am the Door!'"

The Continent presents some splendid examples of these decorated

porticoes. The cathedral of Strasburg, preserved as by a series of

miracles in spite of every danger that can assail a building, fire,

lightning, earthquake, and cannonade, has a very grand west entrance;

its tall doors set within a number of receding arches, and the

sharply-pointed gable which crowns them flanked and crested with

tapering pinnacles. The French artists of the thirteenth and fourteenth

centuries were unrivalled in the beauty and wealth of statuary with

which they adorned their churches, and not least their doors. "The glory

and the beauty" of the great porch at Amiens has been set forth fully by

Ruskin, who has woven into one wonderful whole the meaning of the

statues, which, like "a cloud of witnesses," throng the western front.

But Amiens is not alone; S. Denis, Paris, Sens, Angouleme, Poictiers,

Autun, Chartres, Laon, Rheims, Vezelay, Auxerre, and other cathedrals

are all magnificent in this respect. The principal entrance to Seville

cathedral is flanked by columns upholding niches filled with figures of

saints and angels, while the tympanum contains a carving of the entrance

of the Saviour into Jerusalem on the first Palm Sunday. In the island of

Majorca, the south door-way of the cathedral of Palma is exceptionally

beautiful. The statue of the Blessed Virgin crowns the centre column,

and above is the Last Supper. A record of the architect of this splendid

piece of work is preserved in an old account book of the cathedral: "On

January 29th, 1394, Master Pedro Morey, sculptor, master artificer of

the south door, which was begun by him, passed from this life. Anima

ejus requiescat in pace. Amen." The entrance in the west front is also a

fine one, and is inscribed, "Non est factum tale opus in universis

regnis."

[Illustration: WEST DOOR, HIGHAM FERRERS CHURCH.]

Although in England we cannot match the gorgeousness of detail exhibited

by the flamboyant architecture of some of the examples above noticed,

yet we too have instances of which we may well be proud. The western

front of Peterborough cathedral, over the partial renovation of which

there has recently been so much controversy between architects and

antiquaries, has been pronounced to be "the grandest portico in Europe;"

but this has reference to the whole facade rather than to the door-way

in itself. If our subject allowed of our taking so wide a view, the

splendid west fronts of Exeter, York, and others of our minsters, would

demand a place of honour in the list. Gloucester cathedral has a

dignified porch over the south door, in which are the figures of a

number of saints. The west door of Rochester is also interesting; its

decorated Norman arches are richly carved, and enclose a tympanum

covered with characteristic sculpture. Of a different type is the

graceful west door at Ely, whose pointed arches are upheld by delicately

cut shafts, the tympanum over the twin doorways being pierced by a

double trefoil within a vesica. The parish church of Higham Ferrers has

double western doors, separated by a bold shaft, above which is a niche

(now unoccupied) for a statue. The tympanum, anciently divided by this

figure, has five medallions on each side filled with sculptured scenes

from the New Testament, round which runs a scroll of conventional

foliage. The neighbouring churches of Rushden and Raunds have also good

double-leaved doors. To take one instance from the Northern Kingdom,

S. Giles's, Edinburgh, has a dignified west entrance. Many of the better

examples of our modern churches have admirable porticoes, of which one

example must suffice. All Saints' Church, Cheltenham, has double doors

within receding arches; the tympanum has the figure of Our Lord

enthroned in glory surrounded by the saints, and the central shaft and

the side pillars contain other statues.

There is occasionally found in a cathedral, or other large church, a

porch of unusual depth, known as a Galilee. Here, during Lent, those

assembled who were bidden to do public penance; the coming of Maundy

Thursday being the signal for their admission once more into the church

itself. Ely has a western Galilee entered by an arch, divided by a

central pillar, and filled in the upper part with tracery. Lincoln has a

Galilee, deep and dignified in plan, with a vaulted roof. Another

English cathedral so provided is that of Chichester; and among parish

churches the Galilee is found at Boxley, Llantwit, Chertsey, and

S. Woolos.

Of door-ways which, independently of considerations of date, size, or

form, are noteworthy for their sculpture, there are many that ought to

be mentioned. At Lincoln, for instance, we have a south door carved with

a Doom, or Last Judgment, wherein we see the effigy of the Divine Judge

surrounded by the dead rising from their opening graves. The north door

at Ely, the whole of the surrounding stone-work of which is elaborately

carved, is surmounted by the figure of the Lord enthroned within a

vesica, while adoring angels kneel before Him. At Rougham, in Norfolk,

the west door is surmounted by a crucifix, round which runs the

emblematic vine. Founhope church, Hereford, has in the tympanum of the

arch the Madonna and the Holy Child, a grotesque with birds and beasts

surrounding the figures. At Elkstone, Gloucestershire, the south

door-way, a specimen (like the one at Founhope) of Norman work, has some

interesting sculptures. In the centre of the tympanum is Christ

enthroned, with the apocalyptic symbols of the evangelists around Him;

beyond these on the right hand of Christ is the Agnus Dei with the flag,

an emblem of the Resurrection, while on the left is a wide open pair of

jaws, known as a Hell-mouth: above all the Father's Hand is seen in the

attitude of benediction. Elstow church has sculptured figures above the

north door; not within the containing arch, but within a separate arched

space divided from the door-way by a string-course. Haltham church, in

Lincolnshire, has some exceedingly curious designs on the tympanum of

the south door; they are mostly cruciform figures within circles, and

are arranged with strange irregularity. The north door of Lutterworth

church has over it a fresco painting.

[Illustration: NORTH DOOR, ELSTOW CHURCH.]

Several of the churches in Brussels have door-ways which, though

otherwise not remarkable, are noteworthy from the beauty of the carving

of the central post dividing the two leaves of the door. The church of

Notre Dame de Bon-Secours has the effigy of its patron saint crowned and

robed, bearing the Infant Saviour; below are the emblems of pilgrimage,

wallets, gourds, and cockle-shells. The church of La Madeleine has a

crucifix with a weeping Magdalene at its foot. The old church of

S. Catharine has its patroness on the door-post, and the Chapelle

Sainte-Anne similarly has S. Anne holding the Blessed Virgin by the

hand. Foliage or scrolls in each case fill up the rest of the column,

which is of wood, and in some instances has been painted.

So far, the doorways have occupied our attention; something must,

however, be said of the doors themselves. The usual form of the old

church door is familiar enough to all of us; the massive time-stained

oak, the heavy iron nails that stud it, and the long broad hinges that

reach almost across its full breadth. There is dignity in the very

simplicity of all this; but not seldom far more ornate examples may be

found.

The most elementary form of decoration consists in merely panelling the

door, as is the case in numberless instances; occasionally the panels

themselves are carved, as on the "Thoresby Door," at Lynn, or the door

of S. Mary's, Bath; or tracery, as in a window, is introduced, as at

Alford, Lincolnshire. These are but a few of the many instances which

might be cited. Another striking form of decoration is produced by

hammering out the long hinges into a design covering, more or less, the

surface of the door. The west door at Higham Ferrers, already noticed,

has on each of its leaves three hinges, which are formed into wide

spreading scrolls. Sempringham Abbey has very fine beaten ironwork

spread over almost the entire face of the door. A more curious example

is afforded by Dartmouth church; where a conventional tree with

spreading branches covers the door, and across this the hinges are laid

in the form of two heraldic lions. The date is added in the middle of

the work, 1631.

[Illustration: DOOR AT LYNN CHURCH.]

In the decoration of the church door the mediaeval blacksmith proves

himself in a thousand instances, at home and abroad, to have been an

artist. Free from the hurry of the present age, he could work according

to that canon of Chaucer's,

"There is no workman

That can both worken well and hastilie,

This must be done at leisure, perfectlie."

With him it was not the hand only that wrought, nor even the hand and

head; but the soul within him gave life to both. Of the contrast between

old ways and new, few examples are more striking than the hinges of the

door at S. Mary Key, Ipswich; where we have a simple but graceful scroll

of ancient date, and a clumsy iron bar of to-day, lying side by side.

For a beautiful design in beaten iron the doors of Worksop Priory may

claim to have not many rivals.

[Illustration: SOUTH PORCH, SEMPRINGHAM ABBEY.]

The most splendid doors in the world are probably the bronze doors of

the Baptistery at Florence. Other bronze doors there are on the

Continent, and all of them fine; Aix-la-Chapelle, Mayence, Augsburg,

Hildesheim, Novgorod, all have doors of this kind; at Verona, too, in

the church of San Zeno, are ancient examples, whereon are set forth in

panels a number of subjects from Holy Scripture and from the life of the

patron saint. All, however, fall into insignificance beside the "Gates

of Paradise," as the Florentines proudly call their doors.

[Illustration: DOOR AT DARTMOUTH CHURCH.]

In 1400 the Gild of Cloth Merchants of Florence decided to make a

thank-offering for the cessation of the plague; and the form which it

took was a pair of bronze doors for the baptistery of the church of

S. Giovanni, to correspond with some already there. These earlier ones

are the work of Pisana and his son Nino, from designs by Giotto; the

creation of the new ones was thrown open to competition. Many

competitors appeared, of whom six were asked to submit specimens of

designs for the panels; and, finally, when the choice lay between two

only, the elder, Brunellesco, himself advised that the commission should

be entrusted to Ghiberti, a youth then barely twenty years of age. The

doors when completed contained twenty scenes from the Saviour's life,

together with figures of the four Latin Doctors and the four

Evangelists, set in a frame of exquisite foliage. This splendid work was

surpassed by a second pair of doors subsequently made for the same

place. In this there are ten panels setting forth scenes from the Old

Testament history; and the frame is adorned with niches and medallions

in which are placed some fifty allegorical figures and portrait heads.

It was of these last doors, which were only completed in Ghiberti's

mature age, that no less a judge than Michael Angelo said, "They might

stand as the gates of Paradise itself."

Aix-en-Provence claims that her doors are as peerless as examples of the

wood-carver's art, as are the Florentine ones as types of the

metal-worker's. They have been preserved, it is said, from the sixth

century, and are still wonderfully fresh and delicate. There are on each

door six upper panels filled with figures of the twelve Sybils; and

below one large panel, occupied, in one case, by effigies of the

prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah, and in the other by Ezekiel and Daniel.

The carving is only occasionally exhibited, two masking doors having

been cleverly contrived to protect and cover the real ones.

Many of the doors of our cathedrals and great abbey churches have

knockers, often of very striking designs. These as a rule indicate that

the places in question claimed the right of sanctuary; and the knocker

was to summon an attendant, or watcher, to admit the fugitive from

justice at night, or at other times when the entrance was closed. A

curious head holding a ring within its teeth forms the knocker at Durham

cathedral; a lion's head was not an uncommon form for this to take, as

at Adel, York (All Saints), and Norwich (S. Gregory's); a singularly

ferocious lion's head knocker may be seen at Mayence.

The deep porch which we so frequently see over the principal door of the

church was formerly something more than an ornament, or even a

protection; it was a recognized portion of the sacred building, and had

its appointed place in the services of the Church. Baptism was

frequently administered in the church porch, to symbolize that by that

Sacrament the infant entered into Holy Church. There are still relics of

the existence of fonts in some of our porches, as at East Dereham,

Norfolk. When baptism was thus administered in the south porch, it was

also customary, so it is alleged, to throw wide open the north door;

that the devil, formally renounced in that rite, might by that way flee

"to his own place." The font now usually stands just within the door. In

the pre-reformation usage of the Church the thanksgiving of a woman

after child-birth was also made in, or before, the church porch; and

concluded with the priest's saying, "Enter into the temple of God, that

thou mayest have eternal life, and live for ever and ever." The first

prayer-book of Edward VI. ordered the woman to kneel "nigh unto the

quire door:" the next revision altered the words "to nigh unto the place

where the table standeth;" and from Elizabeth's days the rubric has

simply said indefinitely "a convenient place."

[Illustration: _From a Photo by Albert E. Coe, Norwich._

ERPINGHAM GATE, NORWICH.]

The rubric at the commencement of the Order of the Solemnization of Holy

Matrimony according to the Sarum use began also in this way: "Let the

man and woman be placed before the door of the church, or in the face of

the church, before the presence of God, the Priest, and the People"; at

the end of the actual marriage, and before the benedictory prayers which

follow it, the rubric says, "Here let them go into the church to the

step of the altar." Chaucer alludes to this usage when in his

"Canterbury Tales" he says of the wife of Bath--

"She was a worthy woman all her live,

Husbands at the church dore had she five."

Edward I. was united to Margaret at the door of Canterbury Cathedral on

September 9th, 1299, and other mediaeval notices of the custom occur.

The first prayer-book of Edward VI. introduced an alteration which has

been maintained ever since; the new rubric reading that "The persons to

be married shall come into the body of the Church," just as it does in

our modern prayer-books. In France the custom survived as late as the

seventeenth century, at least in some instances, for the marriage of

Charles I., who was represented by a proxy, and Henrietta Maria was

performed at the door of Notre Dame in Paris. In Herrick's "Hesperides"

is a little poem entitled "The Entertainment, or, _A Porch-verse_ at the

marriage of Mr. Henry Northly and the most witty Mrs. Lettice Yard." It

commences:--

"Welcome! but yet no entrance till we blesse

First you, then you, then both for white success."

This was published in the midst of the great Civil War, and seems to

show that the custom of marriage at the church porch was still

sufficiently known, even if only by tradition, to make allusions to it

"understanded of the people."

Burials sometimes took place in the church porch, in those days when

interment within the building was much sought after.

Ecclesiastical Courts were frequently held in church porches, as at the

south door of Canterbury Cathedral; schools were occasionally

established in them; and here the dower of the bride was formally

presented to the bridegroom. This last-named use of the porch is

illustrated by a deed of the time of Edward I., by which Robert Fitz

Roger, a gentleman of Northamptonshire, bound himself to marry his son

within a given time to Hawisia, daughter of Robert de Tybetot, and "to

endow her at the church door" with property equal to a hundred pounds

per annum. We still have evidence of the fact that the church door was

of old considered the most prominent and public place in the parish in

the continued use of it as the official place for posting legal notices

of general interest, such as lists of voters, summonses for public

meetings, and so forth.

There are often in connection with ancient ecclesiastical foundations

doors and gateways which are of great interest, though they can scarcely

be called church doors. Of this class are the entrances to the chapter

houses of cathedrals, many of which are very fine. At York, for

example, the chapter-house, which proudly asserts in an inscription near

the entrance that, "as the rose is among the flowers, so is it among

buildings," has a doorway not unworthy of the beautiful interior.

The gateway which gave admittance to the sacred enclosure of the

abbey--the garth or close round which were ranged the monastic

buildings--is in many cases an imposing and elaborate piece of

architecture. Bristol has an interesting Norman gateway, and that at

Durham is massive and impressive, as are all the conventual remains

there. Norwich is specially rich in this respect. The Erpingham Gate was

the gift of Sir Thomas Erpingham, who died in 1420, and whom the King,

in Shakespere's play of "King Henry V." (Act iv. sc. I), calls a "good

old knight;" S. Ethelbert's Gate was built at the cost of Bishop

Alnwick, who ruled the see from 1426 to 1436.

But to speak of these things is to wander from our present subject, and

even that is too wide to be dealt with fully in a paper such as this.

The legends and traditions of the church porch might occupy many a page,

while we gossiped over the mystic rites of S. John's Eve or of All

Hallow E'en; or while we told how Ralph, Bishop of Chichester, barred

his cathedral door with thorns in his anger against the King and his

friends; or how the skins of marauding Danes have in more than one

instance been nailed as leather coverings to the doors of English

churches. Enough, however, has probably been said to show the wealth of

interest which may often be found to hang about the old church porch, in

which the village church may often be as rich as the great cathedral or

the stately abbey.

Sacrificial Foundations.

By England Howlett.

In early ages a sacrifice of some sort or other was offered on the

foundation of nearly every building. In heathen times a sacrifice was

offered to the god under whose protection the building was placed; in

Christian times, while many old pagan customs lingered on, the sacrifice

was continued, but was given another meaning. The foundation of a

castle, a church, or a house was frequently laid in blood; indeed it was

said, and commonly believed, that no edifice would stand firmly for long

unless the foundation was laid in blood. It was a practice frequently to

place some animal under the corner stone--a dog, a wolf, a goat,

sometimes even the body of a malefactor who had been executed.

Heinrich Heine says:--"In the middle ages the opinion prevailed that

when any building was to be erected something living must be killed, in

the blood of which the foundation had to be laid, by which process the

building would be secured from falling; and in ballads and traditions

the remembrance is still preserved how children and animals were

slaughtered for the purpose of strengthening large buildings with their

blood."

"... I repent:

There is no sure foundation set on blood,

No certain life achiev'd by other's death."

King John, Act iv., Sc. 2.

Shakespeare.

To many of our churches tradition associates some animal and it

generally goes by the name of the Kirk-grim. These Kirk-grims are of

course the ghostly apparitions of the beasts that were buried under the

foundation-stones of the churches, and they are supposed to haunt the

churchyards and church lanes. A spectre dog which went by the name of

"Bargest" was said to haunt the churchyard at Northorpe, in

Lincolnshire, up to the first half of the present century. The black dog

that haunts Peel Castle, and the bloodhound of Launceston Castle, are

the spectres of the animals buried under their walls. The apparitions of

children in certain old mansions are the faded recollections of the

sacrifices offered when these houses were first erected, not perhaps

the present buildings, but the original halls or castles prior to the

conquest, and into the foundations of which children were often built.

The Cauld Lad of Hilton Castle in the valley of the Wear is well known.

He is said to wail at night:

"Wae's me, wae's me,

The acorn's not yet

Fallen from the tree

That's to grow the wood,

That's to make the cradle,

That's to rock the bairn,

That's to grow to a man,

That's to lay me."

Afzelius, in his collection of Swedish folk tales, says: "Heathen

superstition did not fail to show itself in the construction of

Christian churches. In laying the foundations the people retained

something of their former religion, and sacrificed to their old deities,

whom they could not forget, some animal, which they buried alive, either

under the foundation, or within the wall. A tradition has also been

preserved that under the altar of the first Christian churches a lamb

was usually buried, which imparted security and duration to the edifice.

This was an emblem of the true church lamb--the Saviour, who is the

corner stone of His church. When anyone enters a church at a time when

there is no service, he may chance to see a little lamb spring across

the choir and vanish. This is the church-lamb. When it appears to a

person in the churchyard, particularly to the grave-digger, it is said

to forbode the death of a child that shall be next laid in the earth."

The traditions of Copenhagen are, that when the ramparts were being

raised the earth always sank, so that it was impossible to get it to

stand firm. They therefore took a little innocent girl, placed her on a

chair by a table, and gave her playthings and sweetmeats. While she thus

sat enjoying herself, twelve masons built an arch over her, which when

completed they covered over with earth, to the sound of music with drums

and trumpets. By this process they are, it is said, rendered

immovable.[2]

[Footnote 2: "Thorpe's Northern Mythology," vol. II., p. 244.]

It is an old saying that there is a skeleton in every house, a saying

which at one time was practically a fact. Every house in deed and in

truth had its skeleton, and moreover every house was designed not only

to have its skeleton, but its ghost also. The idea of providing every

building with its ghost as a spiritual guard was not of course the

primary idea; it developed later out of the original pagan belief of a

sacrifice associated with the beginning of every work of importance.

Partly with the notion of offering a propitiatory sacrifice to mother

earth, and partly also with the idea of securing for ever a portion of

soil by some sacrificial act, the old pagan laid the foundation of his

house in blood.

The art of building in early ages was not well understood, and the true

principles of architecture and construction were but little appreciated.

If the walls of a building showed any signs of settlement the reason was

supposed to be that the earth had not been sufficiently propitiated, and

that as a consequence she refused to carry the burden imposed upon her.

It is said that when Romulus was about to found the city of Rome he dug

a deep pit and cast into it the "first fruits of everything that is

reckoned good by use, or necessary by nature," and before the pit was

closed up by a great stone, Faustulus and Quinctilius were killed and

laid under it. The legend of Romulus slaying his twin brother Remus

because he jumped the walls of the city to show how poor they were,

probably arises out of a confusion of the two legends and has become

associated with the idea of a sacrificial foundation. To the present day

there is a general Italian belief that whenever any great misfortune is

going to overtake the city of Rome the giant shadow of Remus may be seen

walking over the highest buildings in the city, even to the dome of St.

Peter's.

Sacrifice was not by any means confined to the foundations of buildings

only. A man starting on a journey or on any new and important work would

first offer a sacrifice. A ship was never launched without a sacrifice,

and the christening of a vessel in these days with a bottle of wine is

undoubtedly a relic of the time when the neck of a human being was

broken and the prow of the vessel suffused with blood as a sacrificial

offering.

In our own time the burial of a bottle with coins under a foundation

stone is the faded memory of the immuring of a human victim. So hard

does custom and superstition die that even in the prosaic nineteenth

century days we cannot claim to be altogether free from the bonds and

fetters with which our ancestors were bound.

Grimm, in his German Mythology, tells us: "It was often considered

necessary to build living animals, even human beings, into the

foundations on which any edifice was reared, as an oblation to the earth

to induce her to bear the superincumbent weight it was proposed to lay

upon her. By this horrible practice it was supposed that the stability

of the structure was assured as well as other advantages gained." Of

course the animal is merely the more modern substitute for the human

being, just in the same manner as at the present day the bottle and

coins are the substitute for the living animal. In Germany, after the

burial of a living being under a foundation was given up, it became

customary to place an empty coffin under the foundations of a house, and

this custom lingered on in remote country districts until comparatively

recent times.

With the spread of Christianity the belief in human sacrifice died out.

In 1885, Holsworthy Parish Church was restored; during the work of

restoration it was necessary to take down the south-west angle of the

wall, and in this wall was found, embedded in the mortar and stone, a

skeleton. The wall of this part of the church had settled, and from the

account given by the masons it would seem there was no trace of a tomb,

but on the contrary every indication that the victim had actually been

buried alive--a mass of mortar covered the mouth, and the stones around

the body seemed to have been hastily built. Some few years ago the

Bridge Gate of the Bremen city walls was taken down, and the skeleton of

a child was found embedded in the foundations.[3]

[Footnote 3: "Strange Survivals," Baring Gould.]

The practice of our masons of putting the blood of oxen into mortar was

no doubt in the first instance associated with the idea of a sacrifice;

however this may be, the blood had no doubt a real effect in hardening

the mortar, just the same as treacle, which has been known to be used in

our days. The use of cement when any extra strength is needed has put

aside the use of either blood or treacle in the mixing of mortar.

It is a curious instance of the wide spread of the belief in blood as a

cement for ancient buildings that Ala-ud-din Khilji, the King of Delhi,

A.D. 1296-1315, when enlarging and strengthening the walls of old Delhi,

is reported to have mingled in the mortar the bones and blood of

thousands of goat-bearded Moghuls, whom he slaughtered for the purpose.

A modern instance is furnished by advices which were brought from Accra,

dated December 8th, 1881, that the King of Ashantee had murdered 200

girls, for the purpose of using their blood to mix with the mortar

employed in the building of a new palace.

A foundation sacrifice is suggested by the following curious discovery,

reported in the _Yorkshire Herald_ of May 31st, 1895: "It was recently

ascertained that the tower of Darrington Church, about four miles from

Pontefract, had suffered some damage during the winter gales. The

foundations were carefully examined, when it was found that under the

west side of the tower, only about a foot from the surface, the body of

a man had been placed in a sort of bed in the solid rock, and the west

wall was actually resting upon his skull. The gentle vibration of the

tower had opened the skull and caused in it a crack of about

two-and-a-half inches long. The grave must have been prepared and the

wall placed with deliberate intention upon the head of the person

buried, and this was done with such care that all remained as placed for

at least 600 years."

The majority of the clergy in the early part of the Middle Ages

doubtless would be very strongly imbued with all the superstitions of

the people. The mediaeval priest, half believing in many of the old pagan

customs, would allow them to continue, and it is both curious and

interesting to notice how heathenism has for so long a period lingered

on, mixed up with Christian ideas.

It is said that St. Odhran expressed his willingness to be the first to

be buried in Iona, and, indeed, offered himself to be buried alive for

sacrifice. Local tradition long afterwards added the still more ghastly

circumstance that once, when the tomb was opened, he was found still

alive, and uttered such fearful words that the grave had to be closed

immediately.

Even at the present day there is a prejudice more or less deeply rooted

against a first burial in a new churchyard or cemetery. This prejudice

is doubtless due to the fact that in early ages the first to be buried

was a victim. Later on in the middle ages the idea seems to have been

that the first to be buried became the perquisite of the devil, who thus

seems in the minds of the people to have taken the place of the pagan

deity. Not in England alone, but all over Northern Europe, there is a

strong prejudice against being the first to enter a new building, or to

cross a newly-built bridge. At the least it is considered unlucky, and

the more superstitious believe it will entail death. All this is the

outcome of the once general sacrificial foundation, and the lingering

shadow of a ghastly practice.

Grimm, in his "Teutonic Mythology," tells us that when the new bridge at

Halle, finished in 1843, was building, the common people got an idea

that a child was wanted to wall up in the foundations. In the outer wall

of Reichenfels Castle a child was actually built in alive; a projecting

stone marks the spot, and it is believed that if this stone were pulled

out the wall would at once fall down.

Bones, both human and of animals, have been found under hearthstones of

houses. When we consider that the hearth is the centre, as it were, and

most sacred spot of a house, and that the chimney above it is the

highest portion built, and the most difficult to complete, it seems easy

to understand why the victim was buried under the hearthstone or jamb of

the chimney.

There is an interesting custom prevailing in Roumania to the present day

which is clearly a remnant of the old idea of a sacrificial foundation.

When masons are engaged building a house they try to catch the shadow of

a stranger passing by and wall it in, and throw in stones and mortar

whilst his shadow rests on the walls. If no one passes by to throw a

shadow the masons go in search of a woman or child who does not belong

to the place, and, unperceived by the person, apply a reed to the shadow

and this reed is then immured. In Holland frequently there has been

found in foundations curious looking objects something like ninepins,

but which in reality are simply rude imitations of babies in their

swaddling bands--the image representing the child being the modern

substitute for an actual sacrifice. Carved figures of Christ crucified

have been found in the foundations of churches. Some few years ago, when

the north wall of Chulmleigh Church in North Devon was taken down there

was found a carved figure of Christ crucified to a vine.[4]

[Footnote 4: "Strange Survivals," Baring Gould.]

A story is told that the walls of Scutari contain the body of a victim.

In this case it is a woman who is said to have been built in, but an

opening was left through which her infant might be passed in to be

suckled by her as long as any life remained in the poor creature, and

after her death the hole was closed.

The legend of Cologne Cathedral is well known. The architect sold

himself to the devil for the plan, and gave up his life when the

building was in progress; that is to say, the man voluntarily gave up

his life to be buried under the tower to ensure the stability of the

enormous superstructure, which he believed could not be held up in any

other way.

It is well known that the extinguished torch is the symbol of departed

life, and to the present day the superstitious mind always connects the

soul with flame. It was at one time a common practice to bury a candle

in a coffin, the explanation being that the dead man needed it to give

him light on his way to Heaven. It is extremely doubtful, however,

whether this was the original idea, for most probably the candle in the

first instance really represented an extinguished life, and was thus a

substitute for a human sacrifice which, in the pagan times, accompanied

every burial. The candle, in fact, took the place of a life, human or

animal, and in many instances candles have been found immured in the

walls and foundations of churches and houses.

Eggs have often been found built into foundations. The egg had, of

course life in it--but undeveloped life, so that by its use the old

belief in the efficacy of a living sacrifice was fully maintained

without any shock to the feelings of people in days when they were

beginning to revolt against the practices of the early ages.

Sir Walter Scott speaks of the tradition that the foundation stones of

Pictish raths were bathed in human blood. In the ballad of the "Cout of

Keeldar" it is said:

"And here beside the mountain flood

A massy castle frowned;

Since first the Pictish race, in blood,

The haunted pile did found."

From Thorpe's "Northern Mythology" we learn that in Denmark, in former

days, before any human being was buried in a churchyard, a living horse

was first interred. This horse is supposed to re-appear, and is known by

the name of the "Hel-horse." It has only three legs, and if anyone meets

it it forebodes death. Hence is derived the saying when anyone has

survived a dangerous illness: "He gave death a peck of oats" (as an

offering or bribe). Hel is identical with death, and in times of

pestilence is supposed to ride about on a three-legged horse and

strangle people.

The belief still lingers in Germany that good weather may be secured by

building a live cock into a wall, and it is thought that cattle may be

prevented from straying by burying a living blind dog under the

threshold of a stable. Amongst the French peasantry a new farmhouse is

not entered upon until a cock has been killed and its blood sprinkled in

the rooms.[5]

[Footnote 5: "Strange Survivals," Baring Gould.]

It is probable that sacrificial foundations had their origin in the idea

of a propitiary offering to the Goddess Earth. However this may be, it

is certain that for centuries, through times of heathenism, and well

into even advanced Christianity, the people so thoroughly associated the

foundation of buildings with a sacrifice that in some form or other it

has lingered on to the present century. Now in our own day the laying

the foundation of any important building is always attended with a

ceremony--the form remains, the sacrifice is no longer offered. For

ecclesiastical buildings, or those having some charitable object, a

religious ceremony is provided, while for those purely secular the event

is marked by rejoicings. We cannot bring ourselves to pass over without

notice the foundation laying of our great buildings, and who shall

venture to say that superstition is altogether dead, and that we are

free from the lingering remains of what was once the pagan belief?

The Building of the English Cathedrals.

By the Rev. Geo. S. Tyack, B.A.

Of all the sins of the nineteenth century, the one which most militates

against its attainment of excellence in art is its impatience. A work

has been no sooner decided on, than there is a clamour for its

completion. Our cathedrals were for the most part reared in far other

times, and are therefore admirable. Growing with the stately, deliberate

increase of the ponderous oak, they speak of days when art was original,

sincere, patient, and therefore capable of great deeds; original, not in

extravagance or eccentricity, but in the realization of the natural

development of style, advancing from grace to grace, from the perfection

of solidity to the perfection of adornment, by an unforced growth;

sincere, in its confidence of its own capacity for fulfilling its

appointed end, in its grasp of the possibilities in its materials, in

its choice of the true, rather than the easy, method of working; and

patient, finally, in its contentment to do in each age a little solidly

and well, rather than a great deal indifferently, in its aim at

artistic perfection in preference to material completeness. Thus it is

that none of our cathedrals are the work of one age, save those of

Salisbury and London, and even they have details which they owe to

succeeding times.

Ecclesiastical Curiosities · 第 1 / 11 段