CHAPTER XVII.

THE LOSS OF FRANCE.

1422-1453.

England had never yet had a sovereign of such tender age as the infant

king who succeeded to the heritage of Henry V. It was under the rule

of a child of less than twelve months old that the long and wearisome

French war had to be continued. Yet at first the prospects of the reign

did not look very dark. The struggle in France was not going ill, and

seldom has any orphan had so zealous and capable a guardian by his

cradle as John of Bedford, the little king's eldest uncle. He had,

moreover, no domestic intrigues to fear; Edmund, Earl of March, the

legitimate heir of Richard II., was the most unenterprising and loyal

of men, and never gave any trouble.

[Sidenote: =The Regency.=]

On his death-bed Henry V. had not appointed his eldest and most capable

brother, John of Bedford, to be the regent in England, as might have

been expected. His ruling passion was strong in death, and he thought

above all things of the maintenance of the English ascendency in

France. Therefore he named Duke John to take charge of the government

of that country. As Regent of England he designated his younger brother

Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, a man of far less worth and weight.

The Parliament, however, held that the king could not dispose of the

regency by will; and though they named Gloucester Protector, placed

many limitations on his power. Unfortunately, they could not remedy his

reckless and flighty disposition.

[Sidenote: =James I. of Scotland released.=]

During the whole of the long minority of Henry VI. the varying fortunes

of the French war were almost the only topic that stirred the interest

of the nation. The internal history of England is well-nigh a blank;

no period since the Conquest is left so bare by the chroniclers, who

seem to have no eyes or ears for anything save the fate of our armies

across the Channel. The quarrels of Duke Humphrey with his colleagues

in the regency are the only other topic on which they touch. The

council carried out the policy of the late king, so far as any body

of statesmen of average ability can continue the work of a single

man of high military and political genius. They strained every nerve

to keep up the war in France, and subordinated every other end to

that purpose. Their wisest act was the release of the young King of

Scots, after seventeen years of captivity. Seeing that his kinsman

Albany was helping the French, they set James I. free, and sent him

home. He married, ere he departed, Joan Beaufort, daughter of the

Earl of Somerset, and granddaughter of John of Gaunt, a lady for whom

he had formed a romantic attachment in the days of his captivity. By

her influence it was hoped that he would be kept firm in the English

alliance. In some degree this hope was fulfilled: James promptly slew

his cousins of Albany, and devoted himself to pacifying and bringing

back into order the country from which he had been so long exiled.

[Sidenote: =Death of Charles VI.--Henry proclaimed King of France.=]

We must now turn to the aspect of affairs beyond the Channel, the

subject which seemed all-important to the English nation at this

time. The old mad King of France had died only two months after his

son-in-law, Henry V. (October, 1422). Bedford had, therefore, to

proclaim his little nephew as king at Paris, and to rule in his name,

no longer in that of the unhappy Charles VI. The Dauphin also assumed

the title of King of France, and was acknowledged as monarch in all

the lands south of the Loire. But he was an indolent and apathetic

young man, governed entirely by his favourites, and wholly unskilled in

and averse to military enterprises. He did so little for himself, and

seemed so contented with his unsatisfactory position, that men called

him in scorn "the King of Bourges"--his residence for the time--rather

than the King of France.

There still appeared to be some chance that the English might maintain

themselves in possession of Northern France. But this hope rested

entirely on the firm and continued fidelity of the Burgundian party

to their English allies. It was only by their help that success could

be won, for ten or fifteen thousand English scattered from Calais to

Bordeaux could not hold down a hostile France. For some time the Duke

of Burgundy aided Bedford, and the Burgundian citizens in each town

maintained their loyalty to King Henry.

[Sidenote: =Victories of Bedford.=]

Bedford's regency commenced with two victories, at Cravant (July, 1423)

and Verneuil (August, 1424), which so tamed the Dauphin's partisans

that the English were able to work slowly west and south, subduing the

land. More would have been done, but for a sudden risk of a breach with

Burgundy, caused by the reckless selfishness of the Duke of Gloucester.

[Sidenote: =Gloucester's expedition to Hainault.=]

Tired of long bickerings with his uncle, Bishop Beaufort of Winchester,

and the other members of the council of regency, Humphrey had resolved

to go off on an enterprise of his own. There was at this moment a

distressed princess in the Netherlands, Jacquelaine, Duchess of Holland

and Countess of Hainault. She had married Philip of Burgundy's cousin,

the Duke of Brabant, a stupid debauchee who treated her very ill.

Escaping from his court, she fled to London, and offered herself and

her lands to Duke Humphrey, if he would take her under his protection.

Of course, a divorce from her husband had first to be procured; but

the pope refused to grant it. In spite of this trifling difficulty,

Gloucester performed a ceremony of marriage with Jacquelaine, though

both of them were well aware that it was a rank case of bigamy. They

then crossed to the continent to take possession of her dominions,

which were held by her husband, John of Brabant. This, of course,

meant war; and not only war with Brabant, but with Burgundy also, for

Duke Philip was the close ally of Duke John, and had no wish to see

Gloucester established in his neighbourhood as ruler of Hainault and

Holland.

[Sidenote: =Threatened breach with Burgundy.=]

Both Bedford and the English council of regency completely disavowed

Gloucester's doings, but it was hard to persuade Burgundy that

England had not determined to break with him. If Gloucester had been

successful, there is no doubt that Burgundy would have joined the

French and driven the English out of France. But fortunately for

Bedford, his brother proved singularly unlucky in Hainault. Seeing

himself outnumbered and surrounded by the Brabanters and Burgundians,

Humphrey left his quasi-wife in the lurch, and fled back to England.

The bigamous duchess fell into the hands of her enemies, and was placed

in confinement. Gloucester took the news with equanimity, and consoled

himself by marrying Eleanor Cobham, a lady of damaged reputation, whom

he had known long before.

[Sidenote: =Siege of Orleans.=]

Owing to Gloucester's failure in Hainault, the breach between England

and Burgundy did not widen into open disruption, but Duke Philip never

again supported his allies with such vigour as in the earlier days of

the war. It was not till 1428 that the English felt strong enough to

make a fresh advance against the lands beyond the Loire. In that year

the regent Bedford succeeded in equipping a small field army of five

or six thousand men--half English, half French partisans of England.

Placing them under Thomas Montacute, Earl of Salisbury, one of the best

captains who had served Henry V., he sent them southward. Salisbury at

first aimed at taking Angers, but turned aside to besiege Orleans, the

key of the central valley of the Loire, and the one place of importance

beyond that river which the French still held. On the 7th of October,

1428, he took post in front of it, and built strong redoubts facing

each of its gates, for he had not a large enough army to surround so

great a city. Thus Orleans was blockaded rather than besieged, since it

was always possible for the French to get in or out in small parties

between the fortified positions of the English.

[Sidenote: =Jeanne d'Arc.=]

Orleans held out long and stubbornly, and while its siege still

dragged on, a new factor was suddenly introduced into the struggle.

The widespread misery and devastation caused by thirteen years of

uninterrupted war had moved the hearts of the French to despair; the

people lay inert and passive, hating the English, but caring little for

the despicable Charles and his Armagnac court at Bourges. It was left

for a simple peasant girl to turn this apathy into energy, and to send

forth the whole people of France on a wild crusade against the invader.

Jeanne d'Arc was the daughter of a villager of Domrémy, on the borders

of Champagne. She was from her youth a girl of a mystic, visionary

piety, who believed herself to be visited by dreams and visions from

on high, which guided her in all the actions of her life. At the age

of eighteen her "voices," as she called them, began to give her the

strange command to go forth and deliver France from the English, whose

arrogance and cruelty had moved the wrath of Heaven. Jeanne doubted

the meaning of these hard sayings, but in repeated visions she thought

that she saw St. Michael and St. Catherine appear to her, and bid her

go to the Dauphin Charles and cause him to place her at the head of

his armies. She resolved to obey their behests, and betook herself

to Chinon, where she presented herself before the prince. Charles at

first treated her slightingly, and his courtiers and captains laughed

her to scorn. But she vehemently insisted on the importance of her

mission, and at last made some impression on the Dauphin's weak and

wavering mind. Apparently she revealed to him a secret known to himself

alone, by some sort of clairvoyance. Charles resolved to give her

mission a trial, and his captains agreed that perchance the company of

an inspired prophetess might put heart into their dispirited troops.

Jeanne's "voices" bade her clothe herself in knightly armour, display

a white banner before her, and ride at the head of the Dauphin's men

to the relief of Orleans. They promised her complete success in the

enterprise, and prophesied that she should lead the prince in triumph

to Rheims, and there crown him King of France.

[Sidenote: =Jeanne enters Orleans.--The siege raised.=]

In April, 1429, Jeanne entered Orleans with a convoy of food and a

small troop of men-at-arms. The townsmen needed her encouragement,

but their English foes outside were also in evil case. The task was

too great for the little army of the besiegers, who had already lost

many men, and had seen their leader, Thomas of Salisbury, slain by a

cannon-shot as he was reconnoitering the walls. The Earl of Suffolk,

who succeeded him, still held his ring of fortified posts round the

city, on both sides of the Loire, but was quite unable to prevent

food and reinforcements from entering it. Nevertheless the men of

Orleans sorely needed the aid that Jeanne brought; for the Dauphin

seemed to have abandoned them, and they had begun to despair. The

success of Jeanne's mission was settled from the moment when the

burghers of Orleans hailed her as a deliverer, and placed themselves

at her disposal. If they had doubted and sneered, like the Dauphin's

courtiers at Chinon, she could have done nothing. But the moment that

she was within the walls, she bade the garrison arm and sally forth

to attack the English redoubts that ringed them in. Her first effort

was crowned with success; a sudden assault carried the nearest fort

before succour could reach it from Suffolk's camp. The men of Orleans

cried that Jeanne was indeed a prophetess and a deliverer sent by God,

and henceforth followed her with a blind devotion which nothing could

turn back or repel. It was in vain that the mercenary captains of the

Dauphin's host endeavoured to moderate the reckless vigour of Jeanne's

movements. After her first success she bade the garrison go on and

conquer, and on four continuous days of fighting led them against the

entrenchments of the English. One after another they fell, for the

French were now fighting with a force and fury which nothing could

resist. "Before that day," says the chronicler, "two hundred English

would drive five hundred French before them. But now two hundred French

would beat and chase four hundred English." The invaders came to dread

the approach of Jeanne's white standard with a superstitious fear;

they declared that she was a witch, and that the powers of hell fought

behind her. At last Suffolk was fain to burn his camp, and to withdraw

northwards with the remnant of his host.

But the disasters of the English were not yet ended. Jeanne had no

intention of allowing them to remain unmolested; the troops who had

already fought under her were ready to follow her anywhere, and the

peasants and burghers all over France were beginning to take up arms,

"now that the Lord had shown himself on the side of the Dauphin." With

a host largely increased by fresh levies, Jeanne went to seek the

English, and caught them up at Patay. There she charged them suddenly,

"before the archers had even time to fix their stakes," and destroyed

almost the whole force, taking captive Lord Talbot, its commander.

[Sidenote: =The Dauphin crowned at Rheims.=]

Jeanne now bade the Dauphin come forth from his seclusion and follow

her to Rheims, the old crowning-place of the French kings. He obeyed,

and brought a great host with him. At the approach of "the Maid

of Orleans," as Jeanne was now styled, fortress after fortress in

Champagne yielded. The regent Bedford was too weak in men to quit

Paris, and so Jeanne was able to fulfil her promise by leading Charles

to Rheims and there witnessing his coronation (July 17, 1429).

She then declared that her mission was ended, and asked to be allowed

to return home to her father's house. But Charles would not suffer it,

because of the enormous advantage that her presence gave to the French

arms. She then bade him strike at Paris, the heart of the English

possessions in France. For the first time in her career she failed;

the Burgundian citizens manned their walls too well, and served their

faction rather than their country. Jeanne was wounded in a fruitless

assault on the city, and had to withdraw. But her campaign was not

fruitless; Soissons, Laon, Beauvais, Senlis, Compiègne, Troyes, and

well-nigh the whole of Isle-de-France and Champagne, were recovered

from the English. The land which Bedford ruled as regent was now

reduced to a triangular patch, with the sea as its base and Paris as

its apex, and included little more than Normandy, Picardy, and Maine.

[Sidenote: =Successes and capture of Jeanne.=]

In spite of her failure at Paris, the prestige of the Maid of Orleans

was still unbroken; she went on winning place after place for King

Charles, though he supported her very grudgingly, and left her to

depend on the enthusiasm of the people rather than the royal arm. But

her career came suddenly to an end; while endeavouring to relieve

Compiègne, then besieged by a Burgundian army, she was unhorsed in a

skirmish, and fell into the hands of the enemy. Philip of Burgundy

would not slay the maid himself, but he meanly sold her for ten

thousand crowns to the English, though he knew that Bedford regarded

her as a witch, and was resolved to punish her as such.

[Sidenote: =Jeanne burnt.=]

The cruel tragedy which followed will always leave a deep stain on the

character of the regent, who in all other matters showed himself a just

and righteous man. Jeanne was kept for many months in prison, subjected

to cruel and ribald treatment, and examined again and again by bigoted

ecclesiastics who were determined to prove her a witch. She constantly

withstood them with a firm piety which moved their wrath, maintaining

that her visions and voices were from God, and that all her acts had

been done with His aid. After much quibbling, cross-examination, and

persecution, a tribunal of French clergy, headed by the Bishop of

Beauvais, pronounced her a sorceress and heretic, and handed her over

to the secular arm for execution; the English, therefore, burnt her

alive in the market-place of Rouen (May, 1431). Her callous master,

Charles VII., made no attempt to save her, and seems to have viewed her

fate with complete indifference.

[Sidenote: =Weakness of the English.=]

Though Jeanne had met a martyr's death, her cause continued to prosper.

The spell of the invincibility of the English had been broken, and with

their inferior numbers they could no longer resist the French assaults,

in which nobles, burghers, and peasants now all united with a single

heart. It was in vain that Bedford brought over the little ten-year-old

Henry VI. from England, and crowned him at Paris (1431). The ceremony

was attended by hardly a single Frenchman; even the Burgundian faction

in the capital were beginning to doubt and draw apart from their old

allies.

[Sidenote: =Dissensions in the Regency.=]

Meanwhile in England the continued ill-success of the war was leading

to the growth of a peace party, at whose head was Henry Beaufort, the

Bishop of Winchester, who had lately become a cardinal. That Beaufort

supported any scheme was a sufficient reason for Gloucester to oppose

it, and Humphrey made himself the mouthpiece of those who pleaded for

perpetual war. The cardinal and the duke quarrelled in and out of

Parliament, their followers were always brawling, and the action of the

council of regency grew weak and divided.

[Sidenote: =Peace proposals.--Burgundy joins the French.=]

At last Beaufort prevailed on the council to submit proposals for

peace to the French court. At Arras the ambassadors of Henry VI.,

Charles VII., and Philip of Burgundy met, and strove to come to terms

(1435). But the English still insisted on claiming the pompous style

of King of France for their young master, and on retaining Paris and

all the North for him. The French were only ready to grant Normandy

and Guienne, and insisted on the renunciation of Henry's French title.

It cannot be doubted that these terms were quite reasonable, but they

were rejected, with the most disastrous results. Philip of Burgundy

was now tired of the struggle, and thought that he had sufficiently

revenged his father's murder by fifteen years of war with the murderer.

On the ground that the English had rejected fair conditions of peace,

he broke off his alliance with them, and made terms with Charles of

France. He got Picardy and the counties of Macon and Auxerre as the

price of his change of alliance.

[Sidenote: =Death of Bedford.--Fall of Paris.=]

Just as the Congress of Arras was breaking up, John of Bedford died,

worn out before his time by his fourteen years of toilsome government

in France. The breach with the Duke of Burgundy and the death of

Bedford had the results that might have been expected. With one common

accord the last French partisans of England threw off their allegiance

to Henry VI. Paris itself opened its gates to the troops of Charles

VII., and the English had soon to stand on the defensive in Normandy

and Maine, their last foothold in Northern France (1437).

[Sidenote: =Struggle for Normandy.--Richard, Duke of York.=]

Nothing is more astonishing than the obstinate way in which the English

government clung to the last remnants of the conquests of Henry V. By

desperate and unremitting exertions the war was kept up in Normandy

for no less than twelve years after Paris fell (1437-49). The heroes

of this struggle were the veteran Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, and the

young Richard, Duke of York, who had just begun to come to the front.

This prince was the son of that Richard Earl of Cambridge, who had

paid with his life for his attempt to overturn Henry V. He was Duke of

York as successor to his uncle Edmund, who fell at Agincourt, and Earl

of March in right of his mother, the sister of the childless Edmund

Mortimer, the last male of his house. York was governor in Normandy

during the most important years of the struggle for the retention of

the duchy, and gained much credit for repeatedly driving back the

invasions which the French launched against it. He grew intoxicated

with success, and made himself a prominent supporter of the unwise

war-policy which Humphrey of Gloucester continued to advocate.

[Sidenote: =Treaty of Tours.--Marriage of Henry.=]

Meanwhile Cardinal Beaufort and the party which opposed Duke

Humphrey--its chief members were Beaufort's nephews John and Edmund,

successively Earls of Somerset, and William de la Pole, Earl of

Suffolk--were always watching for an opportunity of concluding a

peace with France. Whenever they took negotiations in hand they were

denounced by Gloucester as the hirelings of Charles VII., but they

persisted in their purpose. In 1444 they thought that they had

achieved it, for the French king, wearied by constant repulses in

Normandy, consented to make a truce for two years, and to treat for

a definite peace. He signed the compact at Tours, and ratified it

by giving the hand of his kinswoman Margaret of Anjou to the young

king Henry VI.; in consideration of the treaty, the English were to

surrender Maine and its fortresses, while retaining Normandy entire.

[Sidenote: =Indignation in England.=]

Gloucester and Richard of York saluted this wise marriage and treaty

with loud cries of wrath. They said that the Earl of Suffolk, who

negotiated it, must have been sold to France, and spoke of the

surrender of the fortresses of Maine as treason to the English crown.

The greater part of the nation believed them to be right, for Humphrey

and Richard were both popular with the masses, and it soon became a

matter of faith that the Beauforts and Suffolk had betrayed their young

master.

[Sidenote: =Feebleness of Henry.=]

A strong king might have crushed this unwise opposition to peace. But

Henry VI., who had now reached his majority, was anything but a strong

king. He was frail and feeble both in body and mind, a simple soul much

given to exercises of piety and to quiet study. He always sought some

stronger arm on which to lean, and when he had chosen his friends,

wisely or unwisely, he clung to them with the obstinacy that so often

accompanies weakness. Worst of all, he had inherited a taint of madness

from his grandfather, the insane Charles VI. of France, and from time

to time his brain was clouded by fits of apathetic melancholy. Henry

had learnt to trust his great-uncle Cardinal Beaufort and his minister

Suffolk; he would never listen to any accusation against them. His

views were shared by the fiery young queen, who soon began to rule him

by dint of her stronger will.

[Sidenote: =Death of the Duke of Gloucester and Cardinal Beaufort.=]

The truce of Tours lasted for some three years. During this space the

factions in England grew fiercer than ever, and in 1447 came to a head.

At a Parliament at Bury St. Edmunds, Gloucester was suddenly arrested

by order of Suffolk and the queen, and charged with treason. He died

within a few days, probably from an apoplectic seizure, and not from

any foul play. But it was natural that the rumour should get abroad

that Suffolk had secretly murdered him.

Gloucester was only outlived for a few weeks by his lifelong rival,

the old Cardinal Beaufort. Their deaths cleared the way for the rise

of new men: the Cardinal's place at the head of the peace party was

taken by Suffolk and Edmund Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, men of far

lower stamp than the old churchman, who, though proud and worldly,

had always done his best to serve England. Suffolk and Somerset were

busy, self-important, self-seeking men, and coveted power and office

for their own private ends. The Duke of York, who succeeded to Duke

Humphrey's position, was a far more capable man, but he was committed

to the hopelessly unpractical programme of perpetual war with France.

His position, too, was rendered difficult by the fact that Duke

Humphrey's death had made him next heir to the throne after the feeble

young king, for there was now no other male of the house of Lancaster

surviving. The queen, Suffolk, and Somerset began to look on him with

suspicion, and he had to walk warily lest charges of treason should be

brought against him, as they had been against his cousin of Gloucester.

Meanwhile he was fain to accept the position of Lord Deputy of Ireland,

which kept him out of harm's way.

[Sidenote: =Renewal of the war.=]

In 1449 the truce with France which had accompanied the king's marriage

was broken, by the gross fault of his minister Suffolk. Some of the

Norman garrisons were left so long unpaid that they broke into mutiny,

crossed the border, and sacked the rich Breton town of Fougéres.

Failing to get satisfaction from Suffolk for this outrage, Charles VII.

declared war. Normandy was now in the charge of Somerset, a man of very

different calibre from Richard of York, who had held it against such

odds in the days before the truce of Tours. The French, on invading

the duchy, swept the English before them with an ease that astonished

even themselves. The peasants and townsfolk rose against their masters

on every side, and gave the invaders their best help. Town after town

fell; Rouen, the capital of the duchy, was betrayed by traitors within

the gates; and the unhappy Somerset had to fall back on Caen. That

town, with Cherbourg and Harfleur, was soon all that remained to the

English on Norman soil.

[Sidenote: =Battle of Formigny.=]

This terrible news stirred up great wrath and indignation in England

against Suffolk and Somerset. An army was hastily got ready at

Portsmouth, and sent over to Cherbourg, with orders to join Somerset

at Caen. But the French threw themselves between, and forced the army

of succour to give them battle at Formigny. At this disastrous fight

well-nigh the whole English force was destroyed, overwhelmed by an

attack from the rear at a moment when it was already engaged with a

superior French army in front. Only its general, Sir Thomas Kyriel,

and 400 men were granted quarter, while no less than 3000 were slain

(April, 1450).

[Sidenote: =Loss of Normandy.=]

This disaster settled the fate of Normandy. Somerset was compelled to

surrender Caen, and returned, covered with ignominy, to England. The

other garrisons yielded one after another, and nothing remained of all

the mighty conquests of Henry V. in Northern France.

[Sidenote: =The Commons attack the Earl of Suffolk.--His death.=]

Even before Formigny had been fought, or Caen had fallen, grave

troubles had broken out in England. Suffolk had always been unpopular

ever since he gave up Maine and signed the truce of Tours. The news

of the loss of Rouen, and the other Norman towns, sufficed to ruin

him. In spite of the king's continued assurance of his confidence in

his minister, the House of Commons began to send up petitions against

Suffolk, accusing him not only of losing Maine and Normandy, but of

having sold himself for bribes to the King of France. Seditious riots

in Kent and London gave point to the Commons' accusation. Cowed by

such signs of danger, the feeble king removed Suffolk from office.

The Commons then formally passed a bill of attainder against him for

treasonable misconduct of the king's affairs during the last five

years. But Henry would not allow his trusted servant to be harmed,

gave him a formal pardon, and bade him go beyond seas till the trouble

should blow over. Suffolk sailed for Calais, but in the Dover Straits

his vessel was beset and captured by some London ships, which had been

lying in wait for him. He was caught and beheaded after a mock trial,

and his body was cast ashore on Dover Sands. The guilty parties in this

extraordinary crime were never traced or convicted.

[Sidenote: =Cade's rebellion.=]

But the death of Suffolk did not imply the removal of Suffolk's

friends from office. The king kept his ministry unchanged, a piece

of obstinacy which provoked a fresh burst of popular indignation. In

June, 1450, occurred the great political insurrection known as "Jack

Cade's Rebellion." John Aylmer or Cade was a soldier of fortune, who

had served under the Duke of York in France and Ireland. He gave out

that he was akin to the house of Mortimer, and that he was acting by

the consent of his cousin, Duke Richard. His programme was the removal

and punishment of the king's ministers, and the restoration of strong

government and even-handed justice. His rising, in short, was political

in its objects, and did not aim at redressing social evils only, like

that of Wat Tyler. Possibly, Richard of York may have had some hand in

the business, but we have no actual proof that he had egged Cade on.

All Kent and Sussex rose to join Cade, who advanced to Blackheath, and

boldly sent in his demands to the king. Many of the Londoners favoured

him, and the gates of the city opened at his approach. For a moment

he was in possession of the capital. Smiting London Stone with his

drawn sword, he cried, "Now is Mortimer Lord of London." He exercised

his lordship by seizing and beheading Lord Say, the treasurer, and

Crowmere, Sheriff of Kent, two friends of Suffolk. He would have done

the same with others of the king's servants if he could have caught

them. But this violence and the plundering of houses and shops by his

disorderly followers provoked the citizens, who closed the gates and

came to blows with the rebels. The king brought up armed retainers

to help the Londoners, and after a space Cade's men dispersed on the

promise of a royal pardon. Their leader, however, refused to take

advantage of the amnesty, fled to the woods, and was tracked down and

slain a few weeks later. His rising had failed mainly because he was a

mere adventurer, and could not keep his followers in order.

[Sidenote: =The Dukes of York and Somerset.=]

But hardly had Cade fallen, when the Duke of York, whose name he had

been using so freely, suddenly came over in person from Ireland to put

himself at the head of the opposition. His first demand was a change

of ministry, and especially the dismissal of Somerset, who had now

returned from Normandy, and had been placed at the head of the king's

council, as if he had come back covered with glory instead of with

dishonour. But Henry and his queen were set on keeping their cousin

of Beaufort in power, and York had for the time to hold back, lest he

should be accused of open treason.

[Sidenote: =Loss of Guienne.--The Duke of York takes up arms.=]

His opportunity of speaking with effect was not long in coming. In

1451 the French attached Guienne, the last province over-sea where the

English banner was still displayed. The loyal Gascons made a stout

defence, but the king and Somerset sent them no aid, and Bordeaux was

finally compelled to surrender. The loss of Guienne added the last

straw to the burden of Somerset's misdeeds. York, aided by several

other peers, took up arms to compel the king to send away his shiftless

minister. Henry called out an army, and faced York in Kent; but both

were unwilling to strike the first blow, and on receiving a promise

that Somerset should be dismissed, and tried before his peers, the duke

sent his men home.

[Sidenote: =Last expedition against France.=]

The king, however, with a want of faith that he rarely displayed,

refused to put Somerset on trial, and retained him as his minister.

He endeavoured to distract the attention of the nation from his

favourite's misdoings, by proposing that a vigorous attempt should

be made to recover Guienne. The Gascons hated the French conqueror,

and had sent secret messages to London offering to rise if assured of

English aid. No one could refuse their appeal, and with the consent

of all parties a new army was enrolled for the recovery of Bordeaux.

It was given to the charge of Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, the last

survivor of the old captains of Henry V. The gallant veteran landed

near Bordeaux with 5000 men, retook the city by the aid of its

citizens, and overran the neighbouring districts. But fortune had

definitely turned against England: in the next year he was slain and

his army cut to pieces at the bloody battle of Castillon (July, 1453).

Bordeaux held out for three months more, but was forced to yield to

starvation before the year was out.

Thus was lost the last remnant of the great inheritance of Eleanor

of Aquitaine, after it had remained just 300 years in the hands of

the Plantagenets (1154-1453). England now retained none of her old

possessions beyond sea save Calais and the Channel Islands, a strange

surviving fragment of the duchy of Normandy.

The house of Lancaster and the English nation had sinned in company

when they embarked so eagerly in 1415 on the wanton invasion of France.

They had already paid for their crime by lavish expenditure of life and

treasure on foreign battle-fields: they were now to incur the worse

penalty of a savage and murderous civil war.

A history of England · 第 17 / 45 章