CHAPTER XVI.

HENRY V.

1413-1422.

Henry of Monmouth had a far easier task before him, when he ascended

the throne, than his father had been forced to take in hand. He had

the enormous advantage of succeeding to an established heritage, and

was no mere usurper legalized by parliamentary election. So firm did

he feel himself upon his seat, that he began his reign by releasing

the young Earl of March, the legitimate heir of Richard II., whom

Henry IV. had always kept in close custody. For he knew that none of

the odium of his father's usurpation rested upon himself, and that he

was well liked by the nation. Nor was his popularity ill deserved;

though only twenty-five years of age, he was already a tried warrior

and an able statesman. His life was sober and orderly, inclining

rather toward Spartan rigour than display and luxury. He was grave

and earnest in speech, courteous in all his dealings, and an enemy of

flatterers and favourites. His sincere piety bordered on asceticism. If

he had a fault, it was that he was somewhat overstern with those who

withstood him, like his great ancestor Edward I. His enemies called him

hard-hearted and sanctimonious.

[Sidenote: =Persecution of the Lollards.=]

Henry's piety and his love of order and orthodoxy were a source of

much trouble to the unhappy Lollards. From the moment of his accession

he bore very hardly upon them, and redoubled the severity of the

persecution which his father had begun. He did not spare even his own

friends, but arrested for heresy Sir John Oldcastle, Lord Cobham, who

had been one of his most trusted servants. When accused of holding the

doctrines of Wicliffe, Oldcastle boldly avowed his sympathy for them,

spoke scornfully of the Papacy and its claims, and taunted his judge,

Archbishop Arundel, with all the sins and failings of the clergy. He

was condemned to be burnt, but escaped from the Tower and hid himself

in the Marches of Wales. Long afterwards he was retaken, and suffered

bravely for his opinions.

Henry's ill-treatment of the Lollards drove the unfortunate sectaries

to despair. Some of the more reckless of them planned to put an end to

their sufferings, by seizing the king's person, and compelling him to

relax the persecution. They tried to stir up a popular rising, like

that of Wat Tyler, but Henry got timely notice of their plot. When they

began to assemble by night in St. Martin's fields, outside the gates

of London, he came suddenly upon them with a great body of horse, and

scattered them all. Forty were hung next day as traitors, and for the

future they were treated as guilty of treason as well as of heresy.

[Sidenote: =Henry and the French crown.=]

Fortunately for England, Henry had other things in his mind besides the

suppression of the Wicliffites. He knew that nothing serves so well

to quiet down internal troubles as a successful and glorious foreign

war. He believed himself, and rightly, to be capable of leading the

national forces to victory, and he knew that England's old neighbour

and enemy across the Channel was weak and divided. Accordingly, from

the moment of his accession Henry began to prepare for an assault on

France. He was determined to claim not merely the restoration of the

lost provinces of Guienne, but the crown of France itself, as Edward

III. had done in the days before the treaty of Bretigny. It is hard

to discover how a sincerely religious and right-minded man, for such

Henry of Monmouth undoubtedly was, could persuade his conscience that

it was permissible to vamp up once more these antiquated claims. It

would seem that he regarded himself as a divinely appointed guardian

of law, order, morality, and religion, and had come to look upon the

French factions with their open wickedness, their treason, treachery,

murder, and rapine, as emissaries of Satan handed over to him for

punishment. Moreover, Henry was, as we have said, a very zealous

servant of the Church, and the Church did its best to egg him on to

the war. Chicheley, the Archbishop of Canterbury, was one of the chief

supporters of it, partly because he wished to distract attention from

the persecution of the Lollards, and partly because Parliament had

been talking of a proposal to confiscate some Church land, and the

archbishop thought that he had better give them some other and more

exciting subject of discussion. In his old age, Chicheley bitterly

regretted his advice to King Henry, and built his college of All Souls

at Oxford, to pray for the repose of those who had fallen in the great

war which he had set going.

[Sidenote: =Preparations for war.=]

Before he had been a year upon the throne, Henry had broken with

France. It was in vain that the Dauphin and the Armagnac faction,

who were at this time predominant, endeavoured to turn him from his

purpose. They offered him the hand of the Princess Catherine, the

daughter of their mad king Charles VI., and with her the lost provinces

of Aquitaine and a dowry of 600,000 gold crowns. But Henry only replied

by asking for all that his ancestors had ever held in France, the

ancient realm of Henry II., extending from Normandy to the Pyrenees.

When this preposterous demand was refused, he summoned Parliament and

laid before it his scheme for an invasion of France. The proposal was

received with enthusiasm, partly from old national jealousy, partly

because the English resented the doings of the French in the time of

Henry IV., when Norman privateers had vexed the Channel ports, and

French succour had been lent to Owen Glyndower and the Scots. The

Commons and the clergy gave the king very liberal grants of money,

which he increased by seizing the estates of the "alien priories," that

is, the religious houses that were mere branches and dependencies of

continental abbeys.

[Sidenote: =Conspiracy of Cambridge and Scrope.=]

By spending every shilling that he could raise, and even pawning the

crown jewels, the king collected and equipped a considerable army.

He assembled at Southampton some 2500 men-at-arms and 7000 archers

for the invasion. Just before he embarked, however, he found himself

exposed to a deadly peril, which showed him how precarious was the hold

of the Lancastrian dynasty on the throne. A plot had been formed by

his cousin, Richard of Cambridge, the younger brother of that Edmund

of Rutland who betrayed the rebels of 1399. It had as its object the

murder of Henry and the coronation of Edmund, Earl of March, whose

sister Richard had married. In the plot were implicated Lord Scrope,

a kinsman of the archbishop whom Henry IV. had executed and several

others who had grievances against the house of Lancaster. The king sent

them all to the block, and would not delay his sailing for a moment.

[Sidenote: =Siege of Harfleur.=]

He landed in Normandy late in the summer of 1415, and laid siege to

Harfleur, which then occupied the position that Havre enjoys to-day,

and was the chief commercial port at the mouth of the Seine. On the

news of Henry's approach, the French factions for once suspended their

hostilities, and many of the Burgundians, though not Duke John himself,

agreed to assist the Armagnacs in repelling the invaders. But they were

so long in gathering that Harfleur fell, after five weeks of siege. The

capture, however, had cost the English dear; not only had they lost

many men in the trenches, but a pestilence had broken out among them,

and a third of the army were down with camp-fever. After shipping off

his sick to Southampton, and providing a strong garrison for Harfleur,

King Henry found that he had no more than 6000 men left, with whom to

take the field against the oncoming French. But he would not withdraw

ingloriously by sea, and resolved to march home to Calais across

Northern France. This enterprise savoured of rashness, for the whole

countryside was swarming with the levies of the enemy. They had placed

the Constable of France, John d'Albret, in command: with him were

the young Duke of Orleans and all the rest of the Armagnac leaders.

Anthony of Brabant, brother to the Duke of Burgundy, was hurrying to

their aid from the north. By rapid movements--his whole army, archers

as well as men-at-arms, had been provided with horses taken from the

countryside--Henry reached the Somme. But he lost time in trying to

force a passage, and when at last he crossed the river high up, near

Peronne, the Constable and his host had outmarched him and thrown

themselves across the road to Calais. They were at least 30,000

strong, five times the force that Henry could put in line, and were

in excellent condition, while the English were worn out by their long

travel, amid violent October rains, and over bad country crossroads.

[Illustration: BATTLE OF AGINCOURT. 1415.]

[Sidenote: =Battle of Agincourt.=]

When King Henry reached Agincourt, he found the French army drawn up

across his path, and was forced to halt. The Constable, like King John

at Poictiers, was confident that he had the English in a trap, for

they had exhausted all their provisions, and had the flooded Somme in

their rear. Henry, however, was determined to fight, and put his hope

in the bad management which always characterized the disorderly armies

of feudal France. He was not disappointed: the Constable dismounted

all his knights and bade them fight on foot, for fear of the effect of

the archery on their horses. Only a few hundred mounted men formed a

forlorn hope in front. He arranged his army in three heavy columns, one

behind another, and formed the front entirely of mailed men-at-arms;

the cross-bowmen and light troops were placed in the rear, where they

could be of no possible use. The week had been rainy, and the space in

front of the French was a newly ploughed field sodden with water, and

hemmed in with woods and villages on either hand. At its further end

the English were waiting. Henry had drawn them up in a single four-deep

line, in order to make a front equal to that of the enemy. So arranged

they just filled the space between the woods. The archers were on the

wings, protected by _chevaux-de-frise_ of pointed stakes which they had

planted in front. The king with his men-at-arms formed the centre; a

small flanking force of archers had also been sent into the woods on

the right.

The Constable led his men straight on the English front, but they had

a mile to go across the greasy mud of the fields. To men arrayed in

the full knightly panoply, which had vastly increased in weight since

the days of Edward III., the ploughland was almost impassable. After a

space they began to sink as far as their ankles, and presently as far

as their knees, in the mud. The mounted men struggled on, and gradually

drew near the English, but they were shot down one after another as

they slowly forced themselves up to the stakes of the archery. The

main body of the first column never won its way so far; it literally

stuck fast in the tenacious clay and stood a few score yards from the

English line, as a target into which the archers emptied whole sheaves

of arrows. The crowded mass was soon full of dead and dying, for at

such short range armour could not protect its wearers. The whole column

reeled and wavered. Then King Henry, seeing the moment was come, bade

his whole line charge. The lightly equipped archers could cross with

ease the ploughland where the men-at-arms had found themselves unable

to move. They flung themselves upon the French knights, and by the

force and fury of their assault completely rolled them over. Though

unprotected by mail, they obtained a complete ascendency over the

enemy, dashing them down with their axes and maces till they lay in

heaps two or three deep. Henry and the band of men-at-arms around him

seem to have met with the only stubborn resistance: the king had to

fight hard for his life, and was nearly slain by the Duke of Alençon,

who had already struck down his younger brother Humphrey, Duke of

Gloucester. Alençon, however, was slain, and after his fall the whole

of his column was destroyed or captured.

Without a moment's hesitation, the English pushed on to attack the

second column, which was slowly advancing through the mud to aid the

van. Incredible as it may appear, their second charge was as successful

as the first, though the victors were exhausted and thinned in numbers

by the previous fighting, and did not muster half their adversaries'

force. Just after he had routed this second column, Henry received an

alarm that a detached body of the French had assailed his camp in the

rear, and were coming up to surround him. He at once bade his men slay

the prisoners they had taken, a harsh and, as it proved, an unnecessary

order, for the French in the rear only plundered the camp, and then

dispersed with their booty. Although the king had completely scattered

or destroyed the second French column, the third still remained in

order before him; but, cowed by the fate of their comrades, they turned

and retired hastily from the field, though they should by themselves

have been more than enough to overwhelm the exhausted band of English.

In this astonishing victory, Henry's small army had slain a much larger

number of men than they mustered in their own ranks. The Constable of

France, Anthony, Duke of Brabant--brother of John of Burgundy--the

Dukes of Bar and Alençon, and a whole crowd of counts and barons, had

fallen; it is said that no less than 10,000 French were slain, of whom

more than 8000 were men of gentle blood. In spite of the massacre of

captives in the midst of the fighting, there were still some prisoners

surviving. They included the young Duke of Orleans--the titular head

of the Armagnac faction--the Duke of Bourbon, the Counts of Eu and

Vendôme, and 1500 knights and nobles more. The English in this terrible

fight had lost less than 200 men, but among them were two great peers,

the Duke of York--the Edward of Rutland of whom we read in 1399--and

the Earl of Suffolk.

[Sidenote: =Henry returns to England.=]

Henry retraced his way to Calais, and crossed to England with his

prisoners and his booty, there to be received with splendid festivities

by his people, who regarded the glory of Agincourt as a sufficient

compensation for the losses of a costly campaign which had added

nothing save the single town of Harfleur to the possessions of the

English crown. The ransoms of a host of noble captives were relied upon

to replenish the exchequer, and the fearful losses of the Armagnac

party, who saw half their leaders slain at Agincourt, would evidently

weaken the strength of France in the remainder of the war.

[Sidenote: =End of the Great Schism.--Council of Constance.=]

Henry did not cross the Channel again in the year 1416, which he spent

partly in negotiations with the Duke of Burgundy, whose help he wished

to secure against the Armagnacs, partly in treating with the Emperor

Sigismund about the common welfare of Christendom. Sigismund was

hard at work endeavouring to put an end to the "Great Schism," the

scandalous breach in the unity of the Church caused by the misconduct

of the rival Popes at Rome and Avignon. He visited England, and

won Henry's aid for his plans, which brought about the reunion of

Christendom at the Council of Constance--a reunion under evil auspices,

since it was marked by the burning of the great Bohemian teacher

John Huss, who had made the doctrines of Wicliffe popular among his

Slavonic countrymen in the far East. Moreover, it restored the unity

of Christendom, but did not reform either the papacy or the national

Churches. As this was not done, the general outbreak of religious

ferment was made inevitable in a later generation; after the failure

at Constance to reform the Church from within, it became necessary to

reform her from without.

[Sidenote: =Second invasion of France.--Conquest of Normandy.=]

Having come to an agreement with the Duke of Burgundy, and obtained

from him a promise of neutrality, Henry invaded France for the second

time in the summer of 1417. He took with him an army of somewhat over

16,000 men, landed in Normandy, and began to reduce one after another

all the fortresses of that province. Utterly humbled by the memory of

Agincourt, the Armagnacs made no attempt to meet him in the open field.

Some of the Norman towns held out gallantly enough, but they got no aid

from without. At the end of a year the whole duchy, save its capital,

the city of Rouen, was in English hands. Henry then assumed the state

of Duke of Normandy, and put the whole land under orderly government, a

boon it had not enjoyed for twenty years. He gave Norman baronies and

earldoms to many of his English followers, and handed over the control

of the cities to burghers of the Burgundian faction, who served the

English readily enough, out of their hatred for the Armagnacs. For

thirty years Normandy was to remain English. Rouen was added to the

rest of the duchy after a long siege of six months, in which half the

population perished by hunger. Irritated by this long resistance, Henry

imposed on it the harsh terms of a ransom of 300,000 crowns, and hung

Alain Blanchart, the citizen who had been the soul of the obstinate

defence (January, 1419).

While the conquest of Normandy was in progress, the French factions had

been more bitterly at strife than ever. In 1418 the Burgundian party in

Paris rose against their rivals, and massacred every man on whom they

could lay hands, including Bernard of Armagnac himself. The control

of the party of the feudal noblesse then passed into the hands of the

young dauphin Charles, the heir of France.

[Sidenote: =Murder of the Duke of Burgundy.=]

The fall of Rouen, however, frightened John of Burgundy, and unwilling

that France should fall wholly into the power of his ally King Henry,

he made proposals for a reconciliation with the Dauphin and his

Armagnac followers. The treacherous young prince accepted the overtures

with apparent cordiality, and invited Duke John to meet him on the

bridge of Montereau to settle terms of peace. But when Burgundy came to

the conference, he was deliberately slain by the Armagnac captains, in

the presence and with the consent of the Dauphin (August, 1419).

[Sidenote: =Treaty of Troyes.=]

The murder of Montereau was destined to make Henry master of France.

When Philip of Burgundy, the son of Duke John, heard of his father's

death, he vowed unending war against the Dauphin and his faction,

and took the field to help the English to complete the conquest of

France. Nor was Philip of Burgundy the only helper that Henry secured:

the Queen of France, Isabella of Bavaria, bitterly hated her son

the Dauphin, and was glad to do him an evil turn. She proposed that

Charles should be disinherited, and that the crown should pass with

her favourite daughter Catherine to the hands of the English king.

So at Troyes, in Champagne, Henry, Philip of Burgundy, and Queen

Isabella concluded a formal treaty by which Henry received Catherine

to wife, and was to succeed to the French throne on the death of his

father-in-law, the old King Charles VI., who still lingered on in

complete imbecility (June 2, 1420).

[Sidenote: =Henry master of Northern France.=]

The treaty of Troyes put Paris and the greater part of Northern France

into Henry's hands. Casting national feeling aside in their bitter

partisan spirit, the Burgundian faction everywhere accepted the King

of England as the lawful regent and governor of France. South of the

Loire the Dauphin and his Armagnac friends still held their own, but

north of it they only possessed scattered fortresses dotted about in

Picardy, the Isle-de-France, and Champagne, from Boulogne in the north

to Orleans in the south.

After taking formal possession of Paris and holding a great meeting of

the Estates of the French realm at Rouen, Henry returned in triumph

to England with his young wife. He had reached a pitch of success in

war such as no English king had ever attained before, and the nation,

blinded by the personal merits of its king and gorged with the plunder

of France, forgave him all his faults. The waste of life and money,

the never-ending persecution of the Lollards, the precarious tenure of

the conquests in France--due, in sober truth, merely to the aid of the

Burgundian faction--were all forgotten.

[Sidenote: =Defeat of the English at Beaugé.=]

Henry had not long been in England, when bad news crossed the Channel

after him. He had left his brother Thomas, Duke of Clarence, with a

small army, to hold Maine against the Dauphin's adherents. But the

Armagnac bands had lately been strengthened by succours from Scotland,

under the Earl of Buchan, the son of the regent Albany. For, although

the King of Scots had been a prisoner in English hands for ten years

and more, his subjects and his uncle the regent were not thereby

constrained to keep the peace with England. Pushing forward rashly

to attack the Scots and Armagnacs, Clarence was routed and slain at

Beaugé (1421). The enemy at once overran Maine, and began to infest the

borders of Normandy.

[Sidenote: =Henry's third expedition.=]

This compelled the king to cross once more over the sea in order to

repair his brother's disastrous defeat. In a campaign extending from

the summer of 1421 to that of the following year, he cleared the

Dauphin's army out of their foothold north of the Loire, and then

proceeded to starve out one by one their isolated strongholds in the

north of France, the chief of which were Dreux and Meaux.

[Sidenote: =Siege of Meaux.--Death of Henry.=]

It was during the siege of Meaux, which continued all the winter of

1421 and spring of 1422, that Henry's health began to give dangerous

signs of breaking up. He had been campaigning from his boyhood, and

had never hitherto shown any weakness of constitution. But the winter

colds of 1421-2, or the camp-fever bred in the trenches during the

long siege of Meaux, had brought him very low. He was carried back

toward Paris in a desperate state of weakness from ague and dysentery.

Soon after, to the horror and dismay of the English and their French

partisans, he died at the castle of Vincennes on August 31, 1422,

before he had attained his thirty-fifth year.

A history of England · 第 16 / 45 章