XXI

It is Sunday, and I lie under the awning by the engine-room door,

lazily reading "Faust." There is a speck on the sky-line--the

mail boat, bringing a letter from my friend. I look round at the

translucent opal of the bay, the glittering white of the surf on the

reef, the downward swoop on an albatross, and I listen to the dull

roar of the breakers, to the solemn tang-tang of the bell-buoy on the

bar, and the complaisant "_ah-ha-a-a_" of some argumentative penguin.

Even the drab-coloured African hills in the distance, and the

corrugated Catholic church (shipped in sections) with the sun blazing

on its windows, are beautiful to me to-day, for I am not of those who

think religion is ugly because it is corrugated, or that hills are

repulsive because they are not in the guide-book. I am at peace, and

so are the rest. My friend the Mate is fishing, but that, of course,

is trite; the Mate is always fishing. I fancy the cod nudge each other

and wink when they see his old face looking down into those opalescent

depths, and watch him feeling at his lines for a bite. How they must

have joked together this morning when he gave a shout and called for

help, for he could not lift the line! We all responded to the call,

and the line came up slowly. "Must be a whopper," muttered the Mate,

and refused my callous suggestion that it was a coal-bag which had got

entangled in the hook. At last, after an eternity of hauling, came up

part of an iron bedstead, dropped from some steamer in the long ago.

But the true fisherman has reserves of philosophy to cope with such

slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.

Meanwhile the speck has enlarged itself into a blot with a tag above

it and some cotton-woolly smoke. "'Tis the _Nautilas_," observes the

Mate, and he calls it "Naughty Lass" with hibernian unconsciousness of

his own humour. I wonder, now, why it is that we sailor-men invariably

display such frantic _feminine_ interest when another craft heaves in

sight. The most contemptible fishing boat in the Bay of Biscay, when

she appears on the horizon, receives the notice of all hands--the old

as well as the young. And when we pass a sister ship, the _Aretino_ or

the _Cosimo_ or the _Angelo_; in mid-ocean, we talk about her and

criticise her, and rake out her past history, for days. I sometimes

think, from hints the Mate drops, that our own _Benvenuto_ has a past,

a St. John's Wood past I mean, not a Haymarket past. But he will have

no talk by others against the ship. "What's the matter with the ship?"

he will shout. "Damn it all, I like the ship! She's a good old ship,

an' I glory in her!" So we talk scandal about the others instead.

Here, on the ragged edge of the Empire, things are managed

expeditiously by the authorities. Scarcely an hour after the

_Nautilas_ has dropped her pick the tugboat comes out again and flings

us our mail. Bosun and donkeyman trudge aft and take the letters for

the foc'sle, the mess-room steward deposits a letter in my lap, and I

think of my friend. At this moment he is engaged in repartee with the

housekeeper as she lays the table for tea. The heavy twilight is

settling down over the river outside; lovers are pacing the walk as

they return from their Sunday tramp. Possibly, too, that fantastic

scene which he has described to me is now enacting. He is at the

piano; the housekeeper, in tears, is on her knees beside him, and they

raise their melodious voices "_for those in peril on the sea_." How

affecting, for one to be so remembered! I thank them both with all my

heart.

And now he tells me that his play goes well, and I am glad. It will

indeed be a red-letter day when I pay my shilling and climb into the

gallery to see his work. No, I shall not criticise. Probably I shall

hardly listen. I shall be thinking many thoughts, dreaming dreams,

feeling simply very glad and very proud.

I sympathise always with his struggles with his _personnel_, but I

think, though, he hardly allows enough for the point of view. These

actors and actresses are not literary. (They _should_ be, I know.)

They look at an author's work as a man looks at the universe--a small

part at a time. That trite old paradox that, to the actor, the part is

greater than the whole, should never be forgotten. Remember, too, how

"touchy," as he calls it, they _must_ be, in the nature of things.

Their touchiness, their affectation, their lack of culture--all are

inherent in them. _Their_ success is always immediate, using the word

in its literal sense as a metaphysician would use it; the author's

success is mediate, through time and trial. So one should not be

discouraged because they fail to appreciate one's efforts to give

them the atmosphere of the period. They will get the atmosphere

intuitively, or not at all.

He complains of "loss of time," "thankless task," "inefficiency," and

the like. Now, I think that is grumbling without cause. Take my own

case, for example. I have no problems of dramatic art to wrestle with,

only the problem of coal consumption. But it is ultimately the same

thing, i.e., energy. My friend mourns the shameful loss of energy

incident to the production of a decent presentment of his dramatic

conception. I, as an engineer, mourn over the hideous loss of coal

incidental to the propulsion of the ship. The loss in his case, I

suppose, is incalculable: in mine it is nearly seventy per cent. Think

of it for a moment. The _Lusitania's_ furnaces consume one thousand

tons of coal per day, seven hundred of which are, in all probability,

lost in the inefficiency of the steam-engine as a prime mover. It runs

through the whole of our life, my friend! Waste, waste, waste! What we

call the perfect cycle, the conversion of energy into heat and heat

into energy, cannot, in practice, be accomplished without loss. What

may interest you still more is that we cannot, even in theory,

calculate on no loss whatever in the progress of the cycle, and by

this same "entropy loss," as we call it, some of our more reckless

physicists foresee the running down of the great universe-machine some

day, and so eliminating both plays and steam-engines from the problem

altogether. But this is my point. Prodigious loss is the law of

nature which she imposes both on artist and artisan. Indeed, artist

and artisan have their reason of being in that loss, as I think you

will admit.

Again, history will corroborate my contention as to the catholicity of

this loss. Imagine the French Revolution, the Lutheran Reformation,

the "Catholic" Reaction, and the like, to be _revolutions_ of the vast

human engine. Consider then the loss of power. Consider the impulse,

the enormous impulse, applied to the piston, and then look at

the result. What losses in leakages, in cooled enthusiasms, in

friction-heat, in (pardon the ludicrous analogy) waste gases! Think,

too, of the loss involved in unbalanced minds, as in unbalanced

engines, one mass of bigoted inertia retarding another mass! Oh, my

friend, my friend, you talk of "losses" as though you playwrights had

a monopoly of it. Ask men of all trades, of all faiths, and they will

give you, in their answers, increased knowledge of human life.

Such, at least, is my method--digging into the hearts of men. Take,

for instance, my friend the Second Officer. A tall, lean young man,

with an iron jaw under his brown beard. I began to talk to him one

evening because he said he never had letters from home. He had a

sister, he told me, but there was no joy in the telling. "We don't

hit it off," he observed grimly, and I smiled. He has no sweetheart,

loves nothing but dogs. How he loves dogs! He has two at his heels all

day long. He loves them almost as much as dogs love the Chief Officer,

which is to distraction. He will take the solemn English terrier up on

his knee and give me a lecture thereon. This same pup, I learn, is

"low"--look at his nose! He is in bad health--just feel his back

teeth! Saucy? Yes, certainly, but not a thoroughbred hair on him. He

has worms, too, I understand, somewhere inside, and on several

occasions during the voyage his bowels needed attention. I, in my

utter ignorance of dog-lore, begin to marvel that the animal holds

together at all under the stress of these deficiencies. Perhaps the

dirt which he collects by rolling about on deck affords a protective

covering. Once a week, however, his lord and master divests him of

even this shadowy defence, and he emerges from a bucket, clean, soapy,

and coughing violently. In all probability he rejoices in consumption

as well.

The Second Officer, I say, teaches me philosophy. He has had a hard

life, I think. By sheer industry he has risen from common sailor to

his present berth. I say "sheer" because it seems to me that when a

man has no friends or relations who care to write to him, the way of

life must be very steep indeed. I was surprised, though, to learn

of his loneliness. Had he, then, no kindly light to lead him on?

Unconsciously he answered me. Would I come down below and have

something to drink? With pleasure; and so we went. The last time I had

been in that room was when his predecessor, the little man with four

children and a house of his own, had extended hospitality to me. It is

not a pleasant room. A spare bunk full of canvas bolts, cordage, and

other stores, make it untidy; and the Steward's stores are just behind

the after bulkhead, so that it smells like a ship-chandler's

warehouse. Well, we sit down, and the whiskey passes. We light cigars

(magnificent Campania Generals at three farthings each), and then he

ferrets about in his locker. I look at the pictures. Almanack issued

by a rope-maker in Manchester; photo of an Irish terrier, legs wide

part, tail at an angle of forty-five to the rest of him; photo of

Scotch terrier, short legs, fat body, ears like a donkey's; photo of

the officers of s.s. _Timbuctoo_, in full uniform, my friend among

them, taken on the upper deck, bulldog in the foreground. By this time

the Second Officer has exhumed an oblong wooden case containing a worn

violin. Ah! I have his secret. He holds it like a baby, and plucks at

the strings. Then he plays.

Well, he knows, by instinct I imagine, that I care nothing for music,

as music. So when I ask for hymn-tunes, he smiles soberly and

complies. I hear my favourites to my heart's content--"Hark, Hark, My

Soul," "Weary of Earth," "Abide With Me," and "Thou Knowest, Lord."

How glad they must be who believe these words! The red sun was

flooding the room with his last flaming signal as the man played:

"_Abide with me; fast falls the eventide;

The darkness deepens; Lord with me abide,

When other helpers fail, and comforts flee,

Help of the helpless, O abide with me!_"

Yes, _mon ami_, all men know of that tremendous loss inherent in all

their labours. And it is, I think, to balance that loss that they have

invented religion.

An Ocean Tramp · 第 25 / 44 题