VIII. WAR.

Hardly had I got warm in my place when the mutterings of war were in

the air. During the autumn of 1859, on the 16th of October, John Brown

planned his attack on Harper's Ferry. His was a portentous figure. His

position in history--greater than his achievements would warrant--was

due partly to his position as herald of the coming strife, but mainly to

his personal qualities. These were colossal; however much one may

criticise his particular deeds, or the details of his motive, these

qualities can not be exalted too highly. His courage, heroism, patience,

fortitude, were most extraordinary. Even Governor Wise, the man whose

duty it was to see him tried and executed as a felon, said of him; "They

are mistaken who take Brown to be a madman. He is a bundle of the best

nerves I ever saw; cut and thrust and bleeding and in bonds. He is a man

of clear head, of courage, fortitude, and simple ingenuousness. He is

cool, collected, indomitable; and it is but just to him to say that he

was humane to his prisoners, and he inspired me with great trust in his

integrity as a man of truth." Colonel Washington, another Virginia

witness, testified to the extraordinary coolness with which Brown felt

the pulse of his dying son, while he held his own rifle in the other

hand, and cheered on his men. His character made his prison cell a

shrine. On the day of his execution, December 2, 1859, he stood under

the gallows with the noose round his neck for full ten minutes while

military evolutions were performed; he never wavered a moment, and died

with nerves still subject to his iron will. He was a Calvinistic

believer in predestination; a real Covenanter, more like the Scotch

Covenanters of two centuries ago than anything we know of to-day. He was

an Old-Testament man, and like all fanatics was indifferent to death,

either that of other men or his own. His anti-slavery zeal began in his

youth. He early took an oath to make war against slavery, and, it is

said, called his older sons together on one occasion and made them

pledge themselves, kneeling in prayer, to the anti-slavery crusade. This

purpose he always bore in mind, whatever else he was doing; he even

chose the spot for his attempt--the mountains which Washington had

selected as a final retreat should he be defeated by the English. Nearly

nine years before his own death, he exhorted the members of the "League

of Gileadites" to stand by one another and by their friends as long as a

drop of blood remained and be hanged, if they must, but to tell no tales

out of school.

Then came the war. Though its physical aspect,--the loss of treasure and

of blood--was most affecting, I cannot but think that its mental and

moral aspect has been underrated. Its whole justification lay in its

moral character, and I must believe that full justice has never been

done to those who were obliged to stay at home and uphold this feature.

The preacher of the Gospel of Peace had as much as he could do to

overcome the horrors of war; and the preacher of Righteousness was

engaged all the time in promoting the cause of justice. They who went to

the front had the excitement of battle, the pleasures of camp-life, the

assistance of comradeship, the comfort of sympathy. The preacher had

none of these. Every day rumors were reaching his ears; "extras" were

flying about in the silence; he had to comfort people under defeat, to

humble them in hours of victory; to interpret the conflict in accordance

with the principles of equity; to keep alive the moral issues of the

struggle. This was an incessant weariness and anxiety; to fight foes one

could not see, and to uphold a cause that was discredited, fell to his

portion; it is no wonder that when the war was over he was spent and

aged.

An illustration of a part of what he had to contend with is found in

the riot of the summer of 1863. This was an anti-abolitionist riot, a

fierce protest against the conscription, and at the same time an

uprising against the government, which was supposed to maintain a war of

the blacks against the whites. The riot was directed against the negroes

and the abolitionists, and was pitiless and ferocious in the extreme. It

was my lot to be in New York in that dreadful week in July. I was

visiting friends in the upper part of the town when the uproar began. As

I walked home down Madison Avenue a group of rough men met me; one of

them snatched at my watch chain, and I should have been maltreated had

not more attractive game in the shape of people in a buggy drawn away

the attention of my assailants. I reached my home in safety. The next

morning, as I walked about the city, there were groups of men standing

idle, or armed with missiles, in almost every street. Had the mob been

organized then it might have done more mischief than it did, for the

inhabitants of the city were unprepared and unprotected. As I stood at

night on my roof, I could see the fires in different parts of the town,

and hear the shots. An arsenal stood on Seventh Avenue, near my house,

full of arms and ammunition which the insurgents wanted. When the United

States troops arrived, they defended this arsenal. Cannons were pointed

up and down the street, guards were posted, officers with their clanking

swords marched up and down before my door. The riot lasted three

days,--from the 13th to the 16th. On the following Sunday a sermon was

preached which gives expression to the better thoughts of the wisest

people, and from which accordingly extracts are made:

Of all the dreadful and melancholy passages in the history of human

progress, none, to a thoughtful man, are more dreadful or

melancholy than those which tell how men have resisted, pushed

away, reviled, cursed, beaten, mobbed, crucified their benefactors.

It does seem, as we read them, as if the most dreaded thing on

earth had been the personal, the domestic, the social welfare; as

if the deepest anxiety on the part of men of all sorts was an

anxiety to escape from their health and salvation; as if the

profoundest dread was a dread of mending their estates, and their

utmost horror was a horror of heaven! It does seem, as we read, as

if happiness, prosperity, success, were the pet aversion of

mankind; as if the signs that were looked for with the most

agonized apprehension were the signs that the kingdom of heaven was

at hand.... We saw this conspicuously and dismally exemplified in

the events of the past week. The one man who, before and above all

others, was a mark for the rage of the populace, the one man whose

name was loud in the rabble's mouth, and always coupled with a

malediction, the one man who was hunted for his blood as by wolves,

who would have been torn in pieces had the opportunity been

afforded, and on whose account the dwelling of a friend was

literally torn in pieces, was a man who had been the steadfast

friend of these very people who hungered for his blood; their most

constant, uncompromising, and public friend; thinking for them,

speaking for them, writing for them; pleading their cause through

the press, in the legislature, from the platform; excusing their

mistakes and follies, asserting and reasserting their substantial

worth and honesty and rectitude, advocating their claims as working

people, vindicating their rights as men; proposing schemes for the

safety of their persons, the healthfulness of their houses, the

saving and increase of their earnings, the education of their

children, the exemption of their homesteads from seizure in cases

of debt, the enlargement of their sphere of labor, the transferring

of their families from the crowded city, where they could do little

more than keep themselves alive by arduous toil, to the fruitful

lands of the West, where they could become noble and

self-respecting men and women. This was the man whose blood was

hungered for. I need not speak his name,--you know whom I mean,

Horace Greeley,--a man whom some call visionary, but whose visions

are all of the redemption of the people; whom some call "fool," but

who, if he seem a fool, is foolish that the people may be wise;

whom some call "radical," but whose radicalism is simply a

determination that the popular existence shall have a sound, sure,

and deep root in natural law and moral principle; at all events, a

man who has lived for the people and suffered for the people, and

been laughed at when he suffered and because he suffered. _This_

was the man whose blood was hungered for. And yet the most

moderate, kind, considerate of all the papers, the last week, was

his paper. And I believe he, even had he fallen into the hands of

his enemies, would have said, "Forgive them, they know not what

they do."

Indulge me in one more personality. I said that the dwelling of a

friend was pillaged by the mob, under the impression that Mr.

Greeley lived there. What was this dwelling? Who was this friend?

The dwelling was one the like of which is rare in any city, a

dwelling of happiness and peace, a home of the tenderest domestic

affections, a house of large friendliness and hospitality, a refuge

and abiding-place for the unfortunate and the outcast. There was no

display of wealth there--there was no wealth to display; yet the

house was full of things which no wealth could buy. It was crowded

with mementos. The pieces of furniture in the rooms had family

histories connected with them; chairs and tables were precious from

association with noble and rare people who had gone. Pictures on

the walls, busts in the parlor, engravings, photographs, books,

spoke of the gratitude or love of some dear giver. One room was

sacred to the memory of a noble boy, an only son, who had died some

years before. There was his bust in marble, there were his books,

there were the prints he liked, the little bits of art he was fond

of, and all the dear things that seemed to bring him back. The

whole house was a shrine and a sanctuary.

And who were the inmates? The master, a man whose sympathies were

always and completely with the working-people, a man of steady and

boundless humanity; the mistress, a woman whose name is familiar to

all doers of good deeds in the city of New York, and dear to

hundreds of the objects of good deeds. To the orphan and friendless

and poor, a mother; to the unfortunate, a sister; to the wretched,

the depraved, the sinful, more than a friend. In the city prison

her presence was the presence of an angel of pitying love; at

Blackwell's Island she was welcome as a spirit of peace and hope.

The boys at Randall's Island looked into her face as the face of an

angel. Again and again had she rescued from the life of shame the

countrywoman, and possibly the kindred of these very people who

plundered her house. For the better part of a year and more she has

been in camp and city hospitals, nursing their brothers and sons,

performing every menial office. At this moment she is at Point

Lookout, doing that work, amid discomforts and discouragements that

would daunt a less resolute humanity than hers, giving all she has

and is to the _people_, to the wounded, crippled, bleeding, and

broken people; giving it for the sake of the people--giving it that

the people may be raised to a higher social level! And she,

forsooth, must be selected to have her house pillaged! She must be

stabbed to her heart of hearts, stabbed through and through, in

every one of her affections, by these people for whom her life had

been a perpetual process of dying! Why, if they had but known this

that I have been telling you, or but a tenth part of it, those men

would have defended with their bodies every thread of carpet she

trod on. But so it was, and so it must be! Only the best names are

ever taken in vain on human lips, and they are so taken because

they are the best, and best is worst to those who cannot understand

it. Theodore Winthrop was shot by a negro. Did he know what he

did?... In thinking of it one's bosom is torn with distracting

emotions, and between feeling for the persecuted and feeling for

the persecutors, one almost loses the power of feeling. Could

anything be more pitiful? Yes, one thing more pitiful there

was--the savage hunting down and persecution of the negroes, as if

they, too, were the enemies of these working-people. The poor,

inoffensive negroes, most innocent part of the whole population!

Most quiet, harmless, docile people, who could not stand in the way

of the white people if they would, and who never thought of

anything but of keeping out of their way! These the enemies of

white labor! As if they had not, for these very white people, borne

the burden and heat of the tropical day, raising the cotton by

which we are clothed, and the rice by which we are fed! As if to

these and the like of these, the white people did not owe a large

share of the manufacturing towns where they get their bread! As if

the lowest foundation stones of this very New York of ours were not

cemented by their bloody sweat! As if there were too many of them

in the country now for the country's needs, supposing the country

ever to fall into a settled and civilized condition again! As if

all there are might not by and by be _required_ to do the work

which white labor can not for a long time, if it can ever, safely

undertake! Strange complications of things! Strange cross-purposes

of human nature! The Southern people would revive the slave trade,

because they have not black laborers enough, and their allies among

ourselves would banish or kill all the black people, because they

interfere with white labor! A mutual stabbing at each other's

hearts! And on each side a stabbing to its own heart!... It is a

very mysterious thing in history, this alliance between the most

turbulent and the most tyrannical, the most depraved and the most

despotic portions of society. The most undisciplined, barbarous,

savage members of a community are ever in a league with the most

overbearing, insolent, imperious, and domineering members of it.

They who are under the least self-control bow most deferentially

before those who rule others with the most cruel rod. The people

who were proudest of having turned out to a man, in London, for the

maintenance of law and order, on the day of the great Chartist

demonstration there, were the most immoral class in the

city--proved by the criminal returns to be nine times as dishonest,

five times as drunken, and nine times as savage as the rest of the

community. (See Spencer's "Social Statics," p. 424.)

In Boston, on the occasion of the rendition of Anthony Burns, all

the thieves, burglars, cut-throats, swarmed from their dens and

volunteered with alacrity to enforce the fugitive-slave law. And

now the leaders of the Southern Confederacy count, and count

securely, on the Northern populace. The fiercest allies of the only

absolutely despotic class in the country are the outlaws of

society. The men who are fighting for the privileges of the

extremest tyranny, the privileges not of ruling merely, but

literally of owning the laboring class, these men have the

implicit, unquestioning, fanatical loyalty of the people who are at

the opposite end of the social scale--the people who own nothing

either of fortune, position, influence, or character, and whose

sole relation towards the despots they worship is that of mad,

savage slaves.

In Europe this alliance between the despotic and the lawless may

be fortunate for the peace of the community. In our Southern States

it is eminently conducive to the tranquillity they desire. But when

the lawless are here and the despotic are there, when the barbarism

is in New York and the tyranny in Richmond, when the elements of

discord and turbulence in our Northern cities fly to support their

iron-handed rulers in the seceded States, there ensues a state of

things, especially in time of war, that is calculated to shake

society to its foundations, and fill every loyal heart with dread.

The unruly, as if they felt instinctively their lack of

self-control, seek a ruler--fly to the strongest to save them from

themselves, worship the sternest, the most high-handed, the

cruellest, and by that natural sympathy with brutality are

maintained in subjection to law.

Heaven speed the time when these heedless, reckless, licentious

children of humanity may feel sensible of the weight of power

without its brutality, may reverence authority when it is neither

beastly nor cruel, may yield obedience to Order, whose symbol is

not the sword, and to Law, whose badge is not the bayonet. But till

that time comes, we, with thoughtful minds and sad hearts and sober

consciences, and souls full as we can make them of human charity

and good-will, must hold in our hands those terrible symbols, and

in the Christian spirit do the ruler's part.

The insurrection did not last long. As soon as the United States troops

appeared the trouble was over and order was restored. There was

fighting; there was pillage; but how many lives were lost and how much

property was destroyed was never exactly known. On the whole, the riot

strengthened the hands of the government, increased pity for the victims

of outrage, and excited sympathy for the negroes and the abolitionists.

The priests, as I well remember, helped in the work of pacification. On

the second day of the uprising, as I was visiting a friend in his studio

on Fifth Avenue, the mob came along, shouting, yelling, brandishing

clubs, on their way to the archbishop's palace, to hear an address by

him. The prelate appeared on the balcony dressed in full canonicals, in

order to impress the people, and delivered a most ingenious and

persuasive address. Beginning "Men of New York," he flattered their

self-esteem, paid a tribute to their sense of power and exalted

influence, and advised them against cruelty and anarchy. The effect of

this speech was surprising in soothing and quieting the crowd. They had

come there in a mood of tumult--they separated peacefully and went to

their own homes, satisfied. From that hour the soul of the riot was

broken.

The incidents of the war cannot be detailed here. The story has been

told too often, and is altogether too long for my space. And after all

the moral issues of the war were the most interesting though not the

most pathetic. The sentiment of union, the establishment of the national

supremacy, the authority of the reign of law, the emancipation of a

degraded race, the new inspiration imparted to a great people, and the

advent of a universal republicanism were most significant. It is quite

likely that the modern uprising of labor and the urgent claims of women

for recognition and civil power were aided, if not suggested, by this

overwhelming triumph of order and enlightenment. It is more than likely

that the position of the United States, as a power among the nations of

the earth, was due mainly to the victory that was achieved by the powers

of liberty.

Recollections and Impressions, 1822-1890 · 第 19 / 41 题