HAMLET'S QUESTION

To be born is painful, and the profit of it so uncertain that we need

not wonder if sometimes the mind as well as the body seems to hold

back. The winds of February are not colder to a featherless chick than

are the surprises which nature and truth bring to our dreaming egotism.

It was warm and safe in the egg; exciting enough, too, to feel a new

organ throbbing here or a fresh limb growing out there. No suspicion

visited the happy creature that these budding domestic functions were

but preparations for foreign wars and omens of a disastrous death, to

overtake it sooner or later in a barbarous, militant, incomprehensible

world. Of death, and even of birth (its ominous counterpart) the embryo

had no idea. It believed simply in the tight spherical universe which

it knew, and was confident of living in it for ever. It would have

thought heaven had fallen if its shell had cracked. How should life

be possible in a world of uncertain dimensions, where incalculable

blows might fall upon us at any time from any quarter? What a wild

philosophy, to invent objects and dangers of which there was absolutely

no experience! And yet for us now, accustomed to the buffets and

ambitions of life in the open, that pre-natal vegetative dream seems

worthless and contemptible, and hardly deserving the name of existence.

Could we have debated Hamlet's question before we were conceived, the

answer might well have been doubtful; or rather reason, not serving

any prior instinct, could have expressed no preference and must have

left the decision to chance. Birth and death are the right moments for

absolute courage. But when once the die is cast and we exist, so that

Hamlet's question can be put to us, the answer is already given; nature

in forming us has compelled us to prejudge the case. She has decreed

that all the beasts and many a man should propagate without knowing

what they are about; and the infant soul for its part, when once

begotten, is constitutionally bent on working out its powers and daring

the adventure of life. To have made the great refusal at the beginning,

for fear of what shocks and hardships might come, seems to us, now that

we are launched, morose and cowardly. Our soul, with its fluttering

hopes and alarmed curiosity, is made to flee from death, and seems to

think, if we judge by its action, that to miss experience altogether is

worse and sadder than any life, however troubled or short. If nature

has fooled us in this, she doubtless saw no harm in doing so, and

thought it quite compatible with heartily loving us in her rough way.

She merely yielded to a tendency to tease which is strangely prevalent

among nurses. With a sort of tyrannical fondness, to make us show our

paces, she dangled this exciting and unsatisfactory bauble of life

before us for a moment, only to laugh at us, and kiss us, and presently

lay our head again on her appeasing breast.

The fear which children feel at being left in the dark or alone or

among strangers goes somewhat beyond what a useful instinct would

require; for they are likely to be still pretty well embosomed and

protected, not to say smothered. It is as if the happy inmate of

some model gad took alarm at the opening of his cell door, thinking

he was to be driven out and forced to take his chances again in this

rough wide world, when, in fact, all was well and he was only being

invited to walk in the prison garden. Just so when the young mind

hears the perilous summons to think, it is usually a false alarm. In

its philosophical excursions it is likely to remain well blanketed

from the truth and comfortably muffled in its own atmosphere. Groping

and empirical in its habits, it will continue in the path it happens

to have turned into; for in a fog how should it otherwise choose

its direction? Its natural preference is to be guided by touch and

smell, but it sometimes finds it convenient to use its eyes and ears

as a substitute. So long as the reference to the vegetative soul

and its comforts remains dominant, this substitution is harmless.

Sights and sounds will then be but flowers in the prisoner's garden,

and intelligence a maze through which at best he will find his way

home again. Some danger there always is, even in such an outing; for

this walled garden has gates into the fields, which by chance may

be left open. Sight and sound, in their useful ministrations, may

create a new interest, and run into sheer music and star-gazing.

The life the senses were meant to serve will then be forgotten; the

psychic atmosphere--which of course is indispensable--will be pierced,

discounted, and used as a pleasant vehicle to things and to truths; and

the motherly soul, having unintentionally given birth to the intellect,

will grumble at her runaway and thankless child. As for the truant

himself, Hamlet's question will lapse from his view altogether, not

because nature has answered it for him beforehand, but because his own

disinterestedness and rapture have robbed it of all urgency. Intellect

is passionate, and natural, and human enough, as singing is; it is all

the purer and keener for having emancipated itself, like singing, from

its uses, if it ever had any, and having become a delight in itself.

But it is not concerned with its own organs or their longevity; it

cannot understand why its mother, the earthly soul, thinks all the good

and evil things that happen in this world are of no consequence, if

they do not happen to her.

9

Soliloquies in England, and Later Soliloquies · 第 21 / 68 题