THE REIGN OF GEORGE III. (_continued_).
Invasion of Holland by Dumouriez--He is defeated at Neerwinden
and goes over to the Enemy--Second Partition of Poland--The
Campaign in the Netherlands--And on the Rhine--The English
Fleets in the Channel and West Indies--Siege of Toulon--First
appearance of Napoleon Buonaparte--Fall of Lyons--The Reign of
Terror--Insurrection in La Vendée--Its brutal Suppression--Worship
of the Goddess of Reason--Opposition to the War in
England--Prosecutions for Sedition--Trials in Scotland--Discussions
on the subject in Parliament--Arrests of Horne Tooke, Thelwall,
Hardy, and others--Battle of the First of June--The War in the
West Indies--Annexation of Corsica--The Campaign of 1794--The
Prussian Subsidy--Successes of Pichegru against the Austrians--The
Struggle for the Sambre--Loss of Belgium--Danger of Holland--The
War in the South--The Reign of Terror continues--The Festival of
the Supreme Being--Death of Robespierre and his Associates--The
Thermidorians--Final extinction of Poland--The Portland Whigs
join the Ministry--Trials of Hardy, Horne Tooke, and their
Associates--Opening of Parliament--The Budget--Attempts at
Reform--Marriage of the Prince of Wales--His Allowance--The
French occupy Holland--It becomes a Republic--Prussia and Spain
leave the Coalition, but the War continues--Campaigns on the
Rhine and in Italy--The War in La Vendée and in Brittany--The
Expedition from England planned--Destruction of the Expedition
at Quiberon--Extinction of the War in La Vendée--Establishment
of the Directory--Attack on George the Third--The Budget--Pitt's
first Negotiations for Peace--Failure of Lord Malmesbury's
Mission--Successes in the West Indies and Africa--Expedition to
Bantry Bay--The Campaign of 1796--Retreat of the French--Napoleon's
Italian Campaign--The Battles of Arcole--A new British
Loan--Suspension of Cash Payments--Grievances of the Seamen--Mutiny
at Portsmouth--Its Pacification--Mutiny at the Nore--Descent on the
Welsh Coast--Campaign of 1797--Preliminaries of Leoben--Treaty of
Campo Formio--Lord Malmesbury's Mission to Lille.
Dumouriez was now making his projected attack upon Holland. On the
17th of February, 1793, he entered the Dutch territory, and issued a
proclamation, promising friendship to the Batavians, and war only to
the Stadtholder and his British allies. His success was brief, and he
was soon forced back at all points. He received peremptory orders from
the Convention to retire into Belgium. He obeyed with reluctance. On
Dumouriez' return to Belgium, he was greatly incensed at the wholesale
rapacity of the Commissioners of the Convention. They had plundered
the churches, confiscated the property of the clergy and the wealthy
inhabitants, and driven the people, by their insolence and violence,
into open revolt. He did not satisfy himself by simply reproving these
cormorants by words; he seized two of the worst of them, and sent them
to Paris under a military guard. General Moreton-Chabrillant, who
defended the Commissioners, he summarily dismissed; he restored the
plate to the churches, as far as he was able, and issued orders for
putting down the Jacobin clubs in the army. On the 16th of March he
was attacked at Neerwinden by the Prince of Saxe-Coburg, and after a
sharply-fought field, in which both himself and the Duke of Chartres
fought bravely, he was routed with a loss of four thousand killed and
wounded, and the desertion of ten thousand of his troops, who fled at
a great rate, never stopping till they entered France, and, spreading
in all directions, they caused the most alarming rumours of Dumouriez'
conduct and the advance of the enemy. The Convention at once dispatched
Danton and Lacroix to inquire into his proceedings, and, roused by
all these circumstances, no sooner had these two envoys left him than
he entered into communication with the Prince of Saxe-Coburg. Colonel
Mack, an Austrian officer, was appointed to confer with Dumouriez,
and it was agreed that he should evacuate Brussels, and that then the
negotiation should be renewed. Accordingly, the French retired from
Brussels on the 25th of March, and on the 27th they encamped at Ath,
where Dumouriez and Mack again met. The result of this conference was
the agreement of Dumouriez to abandon the Republic altogether, to march
rapidly on Paris, and disperse the Convention and the mother society
of the Jacobins. His designs, however, were suspected by the Jacobins,
and he was eventually compelled to go over to the enemy almost alone.
Dampierre, who had been appointed by the Convention to supersede
Dumouriez, took the command of the army, and established himself in
the camp at Famars, which covered Valenciennes. He was there attacked,
on the 8th of May, by the combined armies of Austrians, Prussians,
English, and Dutch, under Clairfayt, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg, and the
Duke of York. He was defeated with terrible slaughter, four thousand
men being killed and wounded, whilst the Allies stated their loss at
only eight hundred men. Dampierre himself lost a leg and died the
next day. Lamarque, who succeeded him, might have easily been made
to retreat, for the French were in great disorder; but the Allies
had resolved to advance no farther till Mayence should be retaken.
Lamarque, therefore, fortified himself in his camp at Famars, and
remained unmolested till the 23rd of the month. He was then attacked
and beaten, but was allowed to retire and encamp again between
Valenciennes and Bouchain. The Allies, instead of pushing their
advantages, waited the advance of the King of Prussia upon Mayence.
Custine, who was put in command of the Rhine, was enabled to keep back
the Prince of Hohenlohe, who had but an inconsiderable force, the King
of Prussia having been compelled to send a large force to Poland,
instead of forwarding it according to agreement to the Rhine.
In fact, whilst these events had been proceeding on the frontiers of
France, Russia, Prussia, and Austria had been dividing Poland amongst
them. The King of Prussia, when contemplating his participation in
this vile business, issued a proclamation assigning the most virtuous
reasons for it. It was to check the spread of French principles in
Poland, which had compelled himself and his amiable allies, the
Empress of Russia and the Emperor of Germany, to invade Poland. But
these pretences were merely a cloak for a shameless robbery. Poland
abutted on Prussia with the desirable ports of Thorn and Dantzic, and
therefore Great Poland was especially revolutionary in the eyes of
Frederick William of Prussia. The Polish Diet exposed the hollowness
of these pretences in a counter-manifesto. This produced a manifesto
from Francis of Austria, who declared that the love of peace and
good neighbourhood would not allow him to oppose the intentions of
Prussia, or permit any other Power to interfere with the efforts of
Russia and Prussia to pacify Poland; in fact, his love of peace would
not allow him to discountenance an aggressive war, but his love of
good neighbourhood would allow him to permit the most flagrant breach
of good neighbourhood. As for the Empress of Russia, she had a long
catalogue of ingratitude against the Poles, in addition to their
Jacobinical principles, and for these very convenient reasons she had
now taken possession of certain portions of that kingdom, and called
on all the inhabitants of these districts to swear allegiance to
her immediately. The Empress having thus broken the ice of her real
motives, the King of Prussia no longer pretended to conceal his, but
called on all the inhabitants of Great Poland to swear allegiance to
him forthwith. The Russian Ambassador at Grodno commanded the Poles
to carry these orders of Russia and Prussia into effect by a circular
dated the 9th of April. The great Polish Confederation, which had
invited the interference of Russia in order to carry out their own
party views, were much confounded by these announcements of their
friends. They reminded the marauders of the engagements entered into by
Russia, Prussia, and Austria, at the time of the former partition, to
guarantee the integrity of the remainder. But this was merely parleying
with assassins with the knife at their throats. The aggressive Powers
by force of arms compelled poor King Poniatowski and the nobles to
assemble a Diet, and draw up and sign an instrument for the alienation
of the required territories. By this forced cession a territory,
containing a population of more than three millions and a half, was
made over to Russia; and another territory to Prussia, containing a
million and a half of inhabitants, together with the navigation of the
Vistula, with the port of Thorn on that great river, and of Dantzic
on the Baltic, so long coveted. As for the small remainder of what
once had been Poland, which was left to that shadow-king, Poniatowski,
it was bound down under all the old oppressive regulations, and had
Russian garrisons at Warsaw and other towns. But all these Powers were
compelled to maintain large garrisons in their several sections of the
appropriated country.
[Illustration: VIEW IN THE OLD TOWN, WARSAW.]
Thus it happened that the King of Prussia, with hands full of
aggression, did not appear on the Rhine to chastise the aggressions of
France, before the month of April. He brought with him about fifty
thousand men, Prussians, Saxons, Hessians, and Bavarians. He was joined
by fifteen or twenty thousand Austrians, under Wurmser, and five or six
thousand French Emigrants under the Prince of Condé. But the French
had on the Rhine one hundred and forty thousand men at least, of whom
twenty thousand were within the walls of Mayence. The Prussians laid
siege to that city, and the Austrians and British to Valenciennes. On
the 21st of July the French engaged to give up Mayence on condition
that they should be allowed to march out with the honours of war, and
this the King of Prussia was weak enough to comply with. They must,
of necessity, have soon surrendered at discretion; now they were at
liberty to join the rest of the army and again resist the Allies.
Valenciennes did not surrender until the 28th of July, and not till
after a severe bombardment by the Duke of York. Thus three months of
the summer had been wasted before these two towns, during which time
the French had been employed in drawing forces from all quarters to
the frontiers of Belgium, under the guidance of Carnot. The Duke of
York was recalled from Valenciennes to Menin, to rescue the hereditary
Prince of Orange from an overwhelming French force, against which his
half-Jacobinised troops showed no disposition to act. Having effected
his deliverance, the Duke of York marched on Dunkirk, and began,
towards the end of August, to invest it; but he was left unsupported by
the Prince of Orange, and being equally neglected by the Austrians, he
was compelled to raise the siege on the 7th of September, and retreated
with the loss of his artillery. The Prince of Orange was himself not
long unassailed. Houchard drove him from Menin, and took Quesnoy from
him, but was, in his turn, routed by the Austrian general Beaulieu, and
chased to the very walls of Lille. According to the recent decree of
the Convention, that any general surrendering a town or post should be
put to death, Houchard was recalled to be guillotined. There continued
a desultory sort of warfare on the Belgian frontiers for the remainder
of the campaign. On the 15th and 16th of October Jourdain drove the
Duke of Coburg from the neighbourhood of Maubeuge across the Sambre,
but the Duke of York coming up with fresh British forces, which had
arrived at Ostend under Sir Charles Grey, the French were repulsed, and
the Netherland frontiers maintained by the Allies for the rest of the
year.
[Illustration: RETREAT OF THE ROYALISTS FROM TOULON. (_See p._ 423.)]
On the Rhine, the war was carried on quite into the winter. The King of
Prussia did not stay longer than to witness the surrender of Mayence;
he then hurried away to look after his new Polish territory, and left
the army under the command of the Duke of Brunswick. Brunswick, in
concert with Wurmser and his Austrians, attacked and drove the French
from their lines at Weissenburg, took from them Lauter, and laid
siege to Landau. Wurmser then advanced into Alsace, which the Germans
claimed as their old rightful territory, and invested Strasburg. But
the Convention Commissioners, St. Just and Lebas, defended the place
vigorously. They called forces from all quarters; they terrified the
people into obedience by the guillotine, Lebas saying that with a
little guillotine and plenty of terror he could do anything. But he did
not neglect to send for the gallant young Hoche, and put him at the
head of the army. Wurmser was compelled to fall back; Hoche marched
through the defiles of the Vosges, and, taking Wurmser by surprise,
defeated him, made many prisoners, and captured a great part of
Wurmser's cannon. In conjunction with Pichegru, Dessaix, and Michaud,
he made a desperate attack, on the 26th of December, on the Austrians
in the fortified lines of Weissenburg, whence they had so lately
driven the French; but the Duke of Brunswick came to their aid, and
enabled the Austrians to retire in order. Hoche again took possession
of Weissenburg; the Austrians retreated across the Rhine, and the
Duke of Brunswick and his Prussians fell back on Mayence. Once there,
dissatisfied with the Prussian officers, he resigned his command, he
and Wurmser parting with much mutual recrimination. Wurmser was not
able long to retain Mayence; and the French not only regained all
their old positions, before they retired to winter quarters, but Hoche
crossed the lines and wintered in the Palatinate, the scene of so many
French devastations in past wars. The French also repulsed the enemy on
the Spanish and Sardinian frontiers.
Though war had long been foreseen with France, when it took place we
had no fleet in a proper condition to put to sea. It was not till the
14th of July that Lord Howe, who had taken the command of the Channel
fleet, sailed from Spithead with fifteen ships of the line, three of
which were first-rates, but none of them of that speed and equipment
which they ought to have been. He soon obtained intelligence of a
French fleet of seventeen sail of the line, seen westward of Belleisle.
He sent into Plymouth, and had two third-rate vessels added to his
squadron. On the 31st of July he caught sight of the French fleet, but
never came up with them, the French ships being better sailers. After
beating about in vain, he returned to port, anchoring in Torbay on the
4th of September. At the end of October Howe put to sea again with
twenty-four sail of the line and several frigates, and several times
came near the French fleet, but could never get to engage. He, however,
protected our merchant vessels and disciplined his sailors. One French
ship was taken off Barfleur by Captain Saumarez of the _Crescent_, and
that was all.
In the West Indies a small squadron and some land troops took the
islands of Tobago, St. Pierre, and Miquelon. At the invitation of the
planters, we also took possession of the western or French portion of
St. Domingo; but in Martinique, where we had had the same invitation,
the Royalist French did not support our efforts according to promise,
and the enterprise failed from the smallness of the force employed.
Besides these transactions, there occurred a severe fight between
Captain Courteney, of the frigate _Boston_, with only thirty-two
guns and two hundred men, and the _Ambuscade_, a French frigate of
thirty-six guns and four hundred picked men, in which both received
much damage, and in which Captain Courteney was killed, but in which
the Frenchman was compelled to haul off. In the East Indies we again
seized Pondicherry, and all the small factories of the French.
The great maritime struggle of the year was at Toulon. The south of
France was then in active combination against the Convention and the
Jacobin faction. There was a determination in Toulon, Marseilles,
and other places on the coast to support the Royalist party in Aix,
Lyons, and other cities. For this purpose they invited the British to
co-operate with them. Lord Hood, having obtained from the people of
Toulon an engagement to surrender the fleet and town to him, to be held
for Louis XVII., arrived before that port in July, with, however,
only seven ships of the line, four frigates, and some smaller vessels.
Nearly all the old Royalist naval officers were collected in Toulon,
and were so eager for revenge on the Jacobin officers and sailors--who
had not only superseded them, but had persecuted them with all the
savage cruelty of their faction--that they were all for surrendering
their fleet to Lord Hood, and putting him in possession of the forts
and batteries. There was a firm opposition to this on the part of
the Republicans, both in the fleet and the town, but it was carried
against them. Besides the Royalist townsmen, there were ten thousand
Provençals in arms in the town and vicinity. As General Cartaux had
defeated the Royalists at Marseilles, taken possession of the town,
and, after executing severe measures on the Royalists there, was now in
full march for Toulon, there was no time to be lost. Lord Hood landed
a body of men under Captain Elphinstone, to whom the forts commanding
the port were quietly surrendered. Lord Hood was thus at once put into
possession of the best French port in the Mediterranean, and a great
fleet, with all the stores and ammunition. But he knew very well that
the place itself could not long be maintained against the whole force
of Republican France. He resolved, however, to defend the inhabitants,
who had placed themselves in so terrible a position with their
merciless countrymen, to the utmost of his power. He therefore urged
the Spaniards to come to his assistance, and they sent several vessels,
and three thousand men. He received reinforcements of ships and men
from Naples--the queen of which was sister to Marie Antoinette--and
from Sardinia. Fresh vessels and men also arrived from England. Lord
Mulgrave arrived from Italy, and at Lord Hood's request assumed
command, for the time, of the land forces.
General Cartaux arrived and took up his position in the villages
around Toulon. He was reinforced by General Doppet, from the Rhone,
and General Dugommier, from the Var; and the latter had in his
corps-d'armée a young lieutenant of artillery, who contained in his yet
unknown person the very genius of war--namely, Napoleon Buonaparte.
Cartaux was a man who had risen from the ranks; Doppet had been a
physician in Savoy; and Dugommier was acting on a plan sent from the
Convention. Buonaparte suggested what he thought a much superior
plan. "All you need," he said, "is to send away the English; and to
do that, you have only to sweep the harbour and the roadstead with
your batteries. Drive away the ships, and the troops will not remain.
Take the promontory of La Grasse, which commands both the inner and
outer harbour, and Toulon will be yours in a couple of days." On this
promontory stood two forts, Equilette and Balaquier, which had been
much strengthened by the English. It was resolved to assault these
forts, and batteries opposite to them were erected by the French under
Buonaparte's direction. After much desperate fighting, vast numbers of
troops being pressed against the forts, that of Balaquier was taken.
This gave the French such command of the inner harbour, that Lord Hood
called a council of war, and showed the necessity of retiring with the
fleet, and thus enabling the Royalists to escape, who would otherwise
be exterminated by their merciless countrymen. This was agreed to, and
it was resolved to maintain the different forts till the ships had
cleared out. The Neapolitans behaved very ill, showing no regard for
anything but their own safety. They held two forts--one at Cape Lebrun,
and the other at Cape Lesset; these, they said, they would surrender
as soon as the enemy approached. They made haste to get their ships
and men out of harbour, leaving all else to take care of themselves.
The Spaniards and Piedmontese behaved in a much nobler manner. They
assisted willingly all day in getting on board the Royalists--men,
women, and children. All night the troops began to defile through a
narrow sallyport to the boats under the guns of the fort La Malaga.
This was happily effected; and then Sir Sidney Smith, who had recently
arrived at Toulon, and had volunteered the perilous office of blowing
up the powder-magazines, stores, arsenals, and the ships that could not
be removed, began his operations. He succeeded in setting fire to the
stores and about forty ships of war that were in the harbour.
After the departure of the British fleet, the Jacobin troops, townsmen,
and galley convicts, were perpetrating the most horrible scenes on the
unfortunate Toulonese. Even the poor workmen who had been employed by
the English to strengthen the defences, were collected in hundreds,
and cut down by discharges of grape-shot. Three Jacobin commissioners,
the brother of Robespierre, Barras, and Freron, were sent to purge the
place, and besides the grape-shot the guillotine was in daily activity
exterminating the people. The very mention of the name of Toulon was
forbidden, and it was henceforth to be called Port de la Montagne.
The troops of the Convention were equally successful against Lyons.
It was speedily invested by numerous troops, under the command of
Dubois-Crancé, one of the Commissioners of the Convention. On the 21st
of August he summoned the place to surrender, but the Lyonese held out
till the 2nd of October, when Couthon, one of the most ruthless of the
Jacobin deputies, arrived, with twenty-eight thousand armed peasants,
from Auvergne. He demanded that the city should be instantly bombarded,
and, if necessary, reduced to ruins. Dubois-Crancé said there was
no need for this merciless alternative, as the place must very soon
yield from famine. Couthon thereupon obtained an order from the
Convention to supersede Dubois-Crancé, as devoid of proper Republican
zeal; and on the 7th of October commenced a terrible bombardment. The
inhabitants came to a parley with Couthon, and agreed to surrender
without conditions. Couthon immediately appointed a committee to try
all rebels, and he sent his opinion of the population at large to the
Convention, describing the people as of three kinds--the wicked rich,
the proud rich, and the ignorant poor, who were too stupid to be good
Republicans. He proposed to guillotine the first class, to seize the
property of the second, and to remove the last into different quarters
of France. The Convention adopted his views cordially, and passed a
decree that Lyons should be destroyed; that nothing should be left but
the houses of the poor, the manufactories, the hospitals, the school of
arts, the public schools, and public monuments; that the name of Lyons
should be buried for ever, and that on its ruins should be erected a
monument bearing this inscription:--"Lyons made war against liberty:
Lyons is no more!" The name of the spot ever afterwards was to be the
Liberated Commune. The massacres were carried out by Collot d'Herbois.
The same scenes, but on a still larger scale, were exhibiting in
the capital. The Reign of Terror was fully inaugurated, and rapidly
extending itself. At first, on the expulsion of the Girondists from the
Convention--that is, in June--the guillotinings were only fourteen. In
July the number was about the same; but in August Robespierre became
a member of the Committee of Public Safety, which carried on the
machinery of government, and then the work went on swimmingly. From the
moment that Robespierre took his place on the Committee, the stream
of blood flowed freely and steadily. His friend--if such monsters can
be said to have any friends--Barrère, who belonged to the timid Plain
till the Girondists were overthrown, now became his active agent. He
proposed, on the 7th of August, that William Pitt should be proclaimed
the enemy of the whole human race, and that a decree should be passed
that every man had a right to assassinate him. On the 9th it was
announced that the Republic was completed; that Hérault de Séchelles
had produced a new and perfect constitution, which was at once adopted
by the Convention. It was a constitution containing all the doctrines
of the Mountain, in the bombast of that truculent faction. As it
was quickly set aside, we need not detail its principles. Then this
constitution was celebrated on the 10th of August, the anniversary
sacred to the downfall of monarchy. Next followed fresh executions,
among the most notable victims being Marie Antoinette (October 16) and
Madame Roland (November 9), while most of the prominent Girondists were
hunted down and killed.
Whilst blood was thus flowing by the guillotine, not only in Paris,
but, under the management of Jacobin Commissioners, in nearly all
the large towns of France, especially Lyons, Bordeaux, and Nantes, a
terrible work of extermination was going on against the royalists of La
Vendée. The simple people of that province, primitive in their habits
and sincere in their faith, desired no Republic. Their aristocracy, for
the most part of only moderate possessions, lived amongst them rather
like a race of kindly country squires than great lords, and the people
were accordingly cordially attached to them. In March of the year 1793
the Convention called for a conscription of three hundred thousand, and
the Vendéans, to a man, refused to serve under a Government that had
persecuted both their priests and their seigneurs. This was the certain
signal of civil war. Troops were ordered to march into La Vendée,
and compel obedience. Then the peasants flew to arms, and called on
the nobles and priests to join them. At first they were entirely
successful, but matters changed when Kleber was put in practical
command.
Their general, Lescure, was killed, and most of their other leaders
were severely wounded. Kleber triumphed over them by his weight of
artillery, and they now fled to the Loire. Amongst a number of royalist
nobles who had joined them from the army of the Prince of Condé on the
Rhine, was Prince de Talmont, a Breton noble, formerly of vast property
in Brittany, and now of much influence there. He advised them, for
the present, to abandon their country, and take refuge amongst his
countrymen, the Bretons. The whole of this miserable and miscellaneous
population, nearly a hundred thousand in number, crowded to the edge of
the Loire, impatient, from terror and despair, to cross. Behind were
the smoke of burning villages and the thunder of the hostile artillery;
before, was the broad Loire, divided by a low long island, also crowded
with fugitives. La Roche-Jaquelein had the command of the Vendéans
at this trying moment; but the enemy, not having good information of
their situation, did not come up till the whole wretched and famished
multitude was over. On their way to Laval they were attacked both
by Westermann and Léchelle; but being now joined by nearly seven
thousand Bretons, they beat both those generals; and Léchelle, from
mortification and terror of the guillotine--now the certain punisher of
defeated generals--died. The Vendéans for a time, aided by the Bretons,
appeared victorious. They had two courses open before them: one, to
retire into the farthest part of Brittany, where there was a population
strongly inspired by their own sentiments, having a country hilly and
easy of defence, with the advantage of being open to the coast, and
the assistance of the British; the other, to advance into Normandy,
where they might open up communication with the English through the
port of Cherbourg. They took the latter route, though their commander,
La Roche-Jaquelein, was strongly opposed to it. Stofflet commanded
under Jaquelein. The army marched on in great confusion, having the
women and children and the waggons in the centre. They were extremely
ill-informed of the condition of the towns which they approached.
They might have taken Rennes and St. Malo, which would have greatly
encouraged the Bretons; but they were informed that the Republican
troops were overpowering there. They did not approach Cherbourg for
the same cause, being told that it was well defended on the land side;
they therefore proceeded by Dol and Avranches to Granville, where they
arrived on the 14th of November. This place would have given them open
communication with the English, and at the worst an easy escape to the
Channel Islands; but they failed in their attempts to take it; and
great suspicion now having seized the people that their officers only
wanted to get into a seaport to desert them and escape to England,
they one and all protested that they would return to the Loire. In
vain did La Roche-Jaquelein demonstrate to them the fatality of such a
proceeding, and how much better it would be to make themselves strong
in Normandy and Brittany for the present; only about a thousand men
remained with him; the rest retraced their long and weary way towards
the Loire, though the Republicans had now accumulated very numerous
forces to bar their way. Fighting every now and then on the road, and
seeing their wives and children daily drop from hunger and fatigue,
they returned through Dol and Pontorson to Angers: there they were
repulsed by the Republicans. They then retreated to Mons, where
they again were attacked and defeated, many of their women, who had
concealed themselves in the houses, being dragged out and shot down
by whole platoons. At Ancenis, Stofflet managed to cross the Loire;
but the Republicans got between him and his army, which, wedged in at
Savenay, between the Loire, the Vilaine, and the sea, was attacked by
Kleber and Westermann, and, after maintaining a desperate fight against
overwhelming numbers and a terrible artillery, was literally, with the
exception of a few hundred who effected their escape, cut to pieces,
and the women and children all massacred by the merciless Jacobins.
Carrier then proceeded to purge Nantes in the same style as Collot
d'Herbois had purged Lyons.
[Illustration: NAPOLEON BUONAPARTE, LIEUTENANT OF ARTILLERY.
(_After the Portrait by J. B. Greuze._)]
These godless atrocities, these enormous murders, beyond all historic
precedent, proclaimed a people which had renounced God as well as
humanity; and they soon proceeded to avow this fact, and to establish
it by formal decree. In their rage for destroying everything old, there
was nothing that escaped them. They altered the mode of computing
time, and no longer used the Gregorian calendar, but dated all deeds
from the first year of Liberty, which they declared to have commenced
on the 22nd of September, 1792. The next and greatest achievement
was to dethrone the Almighty, and erect the Goddess of Reason in His
place. Under the auspices of the Goddess of Reason they did a very
unreasonable thing: they deprived all working people and all working
animals of one rest-day in every month. Instead of having the four
weeks and four Sundays in a month, they decimalised the months,
dividing them each into three decades, or terms of ten days each, so
that there were only three rest-days, instead of four, in the month.
The British Parliament met on the 21st of January, 1794. The
Opposition, on the question of the Address, made a strong remonstrance
against the prosecution of the war. They urged the miserable conduct
of it, and the failures of the Allies, as arguments for peace. They
did not discourage the maintenance of a proper system of self-defence,
and therefore acceded to the demands of Ministers for raising the navy
to eighty-five thousand men. The production of the Budget by Pitt, on
the 2nd of February, gave additional force to their appeals for peace.
He stated that the military force of England, including fencibles
and volunteers, amounted to a hundred and forty thousand men, and he
called for nineteen million nine hundred and thirty-nine thousand
pounds for the maintenance of this force, and for the payment of sixty
thousand German troops. Besides this, he asked for a loan of eleven
million pounds, as well as for the imposition of new taxes. This was an
advance in annual expenditure of fifteen million pounds more than only
two years ago; and when the manner in which the money was spent was
inquired into, the objections became far more serious. It thus appeared
that we were not only fighting for Holland and Belgium, but that we
were subsidising German princes to fight their own battles. There had
been a large subsidy to the King of Prussia, to assist him, in reality,
to destroy Poland. We were, in fact, on the threshold of that system
of Pitt's, by which Britain engaged to do battle all over Europe with
money as well as with men. But remonstrance was in vain. Fox, Grey, and
Sheridan, and their party in the Commons, the Marquis of Lansdowne,
the Duke of Bedford, and the Whigs in the Peers, made amendment after
amendment on these points, but were overwhelmed by Pitt's majorities.
Burke, in the Commons, was frantic in advocacy of war, because France
was revolutionary and impious.
The anti-Gallic spirit was at the same time made violent use of to
crush opinion at home. It is true that there was a foolish zeal on
behalf of the French Revolution in a certain portion of the British
public, which ought, by this time, to have been cooled by the too
obvious nature and tendency of that Revolution; but this might readily
have been prevented from doing harm by a fair exposure of the folly
of the admirers of so bloody and dishonest a system as that of the
French Jacobins. But it was more in accordance with the spirit of
Government at that time to endeavour to crush the freedom of the press
and of speech, under cover of the repression of a Gallic tendency. The
persecution began in Scotland.
The first indictment was preferred against James Tytler, a chemist, of
Edinburgh, for having published an address to the people, complaining
of the mass of the people being wholly unrepresented, and, in
consequence, being robbed and enslaved; demanding universal suffrage,
and advising folk to refuse to pay taxes till this reform was granted.
However strange such a charge would appear now, when the truth of
it has long been admitted, it was then held by Government and the
magistracy as next to high treason. Tytler did not venture to appear,
and his bail, two booksellers, were compelled to pay the amount of his
bond and penalty, six hundred merks Scots. He himself was outlawed,
and his goods were sold. Three days afterwards, namely, on the 8th of
January, 1793, John Morton, a printer's apprentice, and John Anderson
and Malcolm Craig, journeymen printers, were put upon their trial for
more questionable conduct. They were charged with endeavouring to
seduce the soldiers in the castle of Edinburgh from their duty, urging
them to drink, as a toast, "George the Third and Last, and Damnation
to all Crowned Heads;" and with attempting to persuade them to join
the "Society of the Friends of the People," or a "Club of Equality
and Freedom." They were condemned to nine months' imprisonment, and
to give security in one thousand merks Scots for their good behaviour
for three years. Next came the trials of William Stewart, merchant,
and John Elder, bookseller, of Edinburgh, for writing and publishing a
pamphlet on the "Rights of Man and the Origin of Government." Stewart
absconded, and the proceedings were dropped against the bookseller.
To these succeeded a number of similar trials, amongst them those of
James Smith, John Mennings, James Callender, Walter Berry, and James
Robinson, of Edinburgh, tradesmen of various descriptions, on the
charges of corresponding with Reform societies, or advocating the
representation of the people, full and equal rights, and declaring the
then Constitution a conspiracy of the rich against the poor. One or two
absented themselves, and were outlawed; the rest were imprisoned in
different towns. These violent proceedings against poor men, merely for
demanding reforms only too much needed, excited but little attention;
but now a more conspicuous class was aimed at, and the outrageously
arbitrary proceedings at once excited public attention, and, on the
part of reformers, intense indignation.
The persons now indicted were Thomas Muir and the Rev. Thomas Fyshe
Palmer. Muir was a young advocate, only eight-and-twenty years of age.
He was brought to trial at Edinburgh, on the 30th of August, 1793.
He was charged with inciting people to read the works of Paine, and
"A Dialogue between the Governors and the Governed," and with having
caused to be received and answered, by the Convention of Delegates, a
seditious address from the Society of United Irishmen in Dublin, to
the Delegates for promoting Reform in Scotland. He was also charged
with having absconded from the pursuit of justice, and with having been
over to France, and with having returned in a clandestine manner by way
of Ireland. To these charges Muir replied that he had gone to France
after publicly avowing his object, both in Edinburgh and London, that
object being to endeavour to persuade the French Convention not to
execute Louis XVI.; that when in Paris he urged this both on the ground
of humanity and good policy, as tending to make constitutional reform
easier, as well as the keeping of peace with England; that the sudden
declaration of hostilities whilst there had warned him to return, but
had closed up the direct way; that that was the reason of his taking a
vessel from Havre to Ireland; that he had, however, returned publicly,
and surrendered himself for trial at the earliest opportunity.
The most respectable witnesses testified in his favour, that he
had always argued that the monarchy of the country was good; the
government far superior to that of France; that many opinions of Paine
were unsound and untenable; that an equal division of property was
a chimera, and that we here wanted no revolution, but only moderate
reform. The chief witness against him was a woman-servant, who had
lived in his father's family, who deposed to his telling people to
read the "Rights of Man;" to giving an organ-man something to play
"_Ça ira!_" and the like. It is clear that Mr. Muir was what would now
be considered a very moderate reformer indeed. But the Lord Advocate
treated him with the most scurrilous indignity, calling him "that
unfortunate wretch at the bar;" "that demon of mischief;" "that pest of
Scotland." The very proofs of Muir's moderation were turned by the Lord
Justice Clerk into crimes; it was only "policy;" and he proceeded to
pass on him the monstrous sentence of transportation for fourteen years!
This base and disproportionate sentence startled the people of England.
In Scotland then party spirit ran furiously high. As there were clubs
for advocating thorough reform, so there were others for discouraging
and crushing it. The Tory arbitrary principle was rampant, and Muir was
the victim of it.
Mr. Fyshe Palmer was not tried till the 12th of September. He was then
brought before the Circuit Court of Justiciary at Perth, and charged
with writing and publishing an "Address to the People," which had been
issued by the Society of the Friends of Liberty, at Dundee. Palmer was
an Englishman of good family, in Bedfordshire. He had taken his degree
at Cambridge, and obtained a fellowship at Queen's College; but he had
afterwards joined the Unitarians, and had resided and preached some
time at Montrose and Dundee, and had delivered lectures on Unitarianism
in Edinburgh and Forfar. It appeared that Palmer was not the author
of the Address, but had only been asked to correct the proof of it,
and that he had, whilst so doing, struck out some of the strongest
passages. One Mealmaker, a weaver, acknowledged himself the author
of the Address; but Palmer was a Unitarian, and this, to the bigoted
Presbyterianism of his judges, was rank poison. His advocate pleaded
that he was not quite sane, but neither did this avail; the jury
brought in an instant and unanimous verdict of guilty, and the judges
condemned him to be transported for seven years. This was a still more
outrageous sentence than that of Muir, for Palmer had corresponded with
no French or Reforming societies whatever; he had simply corrected a
proof!
Not at all dismayed by this unrighteous severity, the Scottish Friends
of the People met in convention, in Edinburgh, on the 9th of October.
At this Convention delegates appeared, not only from most of the large
towns of Scotland, but also from London, Sheffield, and Dublin. Letters
were also received from the Societies in England. Mr. William Skirving,
a friend of Muir and Palmer, as secretary to the Convention, read these
letters, and other papers, demanding annual parliaments and universal
suffrage. As the British Parliament was considered, and truly, merely a
corrupt clique of the representatives of boroughmongers, they proposed
to apply directly to the king, that he might urge those necessary
reforms on the Legislature. In Scottish fashion, the Reformers opened
and closed their sittings with prayer, presenting a striking contrast
to the French Revolutionists. On the 6th of November delegates appeared
from the Society of United Irishmen, and Margarot and Gerald from
the Society of the Friends of the People in London. Margarot stated
that five hundred constables had beset the meeting in London, to
prevent delegates from getting away to this Convention, but that the
manufacturing towns of England were almost all in favour of Reform;
that in Sheffield alone there were fifty thousand; that a general union
of the Reformers of the United Kingdom would strike terror into their
enemies, and compel them to grant annual parliaments and universal
suffrage.
The Irish delegates described the condition of Ireland as most
deplorable. They said that the Government interest, through the landed
aristocracy, was omnipotent; that the manufacturers were unemployed;
that an infamous coalition had taken place between the Irish Opposition
and Ministry; that the Catholics had been bought up so that all parties
might combine to crush Reform; that the United Irishmen were everywhere
persecuted, and that one of them had only just escaped from a six
months' imprisonment.
Amongst these, for the most part working men, sat a number of
gentlemen, and even one lord, Lord Dacre, who had lived in Paris
and was a regular Revolutionist. The Convention sat unmolested till
the 5th of December, arranging for a future meeting in England, and
organising committees and correspondents in different towns. They also
recommended to all Reform clubs and societies to invoke Divine aid on
their endeavours for just reform. On meeting on the morning of the 5th,
the president, Paterson, announced that himself, Margarot, and the
delegates had been arrested, and were only out on bail. Immediately
after this, the Lord Provost appeared with a force to disperse the
meeting, and though Skirving informed him that the place of meeting was
his own hired house, and that they had met for a purely constitutional
purpose, the Lord Provost broke up the meeting and drove out the
members. That evening they met again at another place, but only to be
turned out again. Still they did not disperse before Gerald had offered
up a fervent prayer for the success of Reform. Mr. Skirving then issued
a circular inviting the delegates to meet in his private house, and for
this he was arrested on the 6th of January, 1794, brought before the
Court of Justiciary, and sentenced to fourteen years' transportation.
On the 13th Margarot received the same sentence; and, in the month of
March, Gerald likewise.
Muir and Palmer, on the 19th of December, 1793, had been conveyed on
board the hulks at Woolwich, before being shipped off to the Antipodes,
and were put in irons; but before they were sent off, the matter was
brought before Parliament. It was introduced by Mr. Adams, on the 14th
of February, 1794, moving for leave to bring in a bill to alter the
enactment for allowing appeals from the Scottish Court of Justiciary in
matters of law. This was refused, and he then gave notice of a motion
for the revision of the trials of Muir and Palmer. Sheridan, on the
24th, presented a petition from Palmer, complaining of his sentence
as unwarranted by law. Pitt protested against the reception of the
petition, and Dundas declared that all such motions were too late; the
warrant for Palmer's transportation was already signed and issued.
Wilberforce moved that Palmer's being sent off should be delayed till
the case was reconsidered, but this was also rejected by a large
majority. Such was the determined spirit of Pitt and his parliamentary
majority against all Reform, or justice to Reformers. On the 10th
of March Mr. Adams again moved for a revision of the trials of Muir
and Palmer, declaring that "leasing-making" (verbal sedition), their
crime by the law of Scotland, was punishable by fine, imprisonment,
or banishment, but not by transportation, and that their sentence
was illegal. Fox exposed the rancorous spirit with which the trials
had been conducted, and to which the judges had most indecently lent
themselves; that the Lord Justice Clerk, during Muir's trial, had said,
"A government in every country should be just like a corporation; and,
in this country, it is made up of the landed interest, which alone has
a right to be represented. As for the rabble, who have nothing but
personal property, what hold has the nation on them? They may pack
up all their property on their backs, and leave the country in the
twinkling of an eye!" Lord Swinton said, "If punishment adequate to
the crime of sedition were to be sought for, it could not be found in
our law, now that torture is happily abolished." The Lord Advocate was
in his place to defend his conduct and doctrine, but Pitt and Dundas
supported these odious opinions. The House also sanctioned them by a
large majority, and Adams's motion was rejected. In the Upper House,
similar motions, introduced by Lords Lansdowne and Stanhope, were
similarly treated.
[Illustration: THE TOLBOOTH, EDINBURGH.]
The success of the Scottish courts in sentencing Reformers encouraged
the Ministers to try the experiment in England; but there it did not
succeed so well. First, one Eaton, a bookseller, of Bishopgate, was
indicted for selling a seditious libel, called "Politics for the
People; or, Hog's-wash." On the 2nd of April, Thomas Walker, a merchant
of Manchester--was, with six others, indicted at the Lancaster assizes;
but Eaton, in London, and these Manchester men, were acquitted. Rather
irritated than discouraged by these failures, Pitt and Dundas made a
swoop at the leaders of the Corresponding Society, and the Society
for Constitutional Information in London; and, in the month of May,
Horne Tooke, John Thelwall--a celebrated political lecturer--Thomas
Hardy, Daniel Adams, and the Rev. Jeremiah Joyce--private secretary to
the Earl of Stanhope, and tutor to his son, Lord Mahon--were arrested
and committed to the Tower on a charge of high treason. No sooner was
this done, than, on the 12th of May, Dundas announced to the House of
Commons that, in consequence of the Government having been informed
of seditious practices being carried on by the above-named societies,
they had seized their papers, and he now demanded that a committee of
secrecy should be appointed to examine these papers. This was agreed
to; and on the 16th Pitt brought up the report of this committee, which
was so absurd in its results that nothing but the most blind political
desperation could have induced the Government to make it known. The
committee found nothing amongst these papers but the reports of the
societies since the year 1791, which had been annually published and
made known to every one. Yet on this miserable evidence Pitt called
for the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act, and it was accordingly
granted, Burke--who now seems to have grown quite politically mad
by dwelling on the horrors of the French Revolution--believing it
the only measure to insure the safety of the country. Windham and
others asserted that the mere suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act
was hardly sufficient: there required yet more stringent measures.
Similar language was held in the Lords, but did not pass without some
severe comments from the Duke of Bedford, and the Lords Stanhope,
Lauderdale, and Albemarle, who declared that Ministers, instead of
suppressing, were creating a veritable reign of terror. The Bill was,
notwithstanding, readily passed; and on the 13th of June an Address
was carried to his Majesty, expressing the determination of their
lordships to punish the men who had been concerned in the so-called
conspiracy. Fox and Lambton condemned this course energetically in the
Commons, declaring that, if there were any conspiracy, the ordinary
laws and tribunals were amply sufficient for their punishment. Fox
moved that all that part of the Address which expressed a conviction of
the existence of a conspiracy should be struck out, but it was carried
entire; and such was the alarm of the country at the reverses of the
Allies on the Continent and the successes of France, that far more
violent measures would have been readily assented to.
Meanwhile Lord Howe had been on the look-out some time for the French
fleet, which, it was understood, was about to leave Brest, in order
to meet a convoy of merchant ships from the West Indies, and aid it
in bringing that trade fleet into port. On reaching Brest, however,
he discovered that the French fleet had sailed, and it was not till
the 28th of May that he caught sight of it out at sea, opposite the
coast of Brittany. The French fleet, commanded by Admiral Villaret
Joyeuse, was greatly superior to Howe's in ships, number of seamen,
and weight of metal. Howe had twenty-five sail of the line and five
frigates, carrying two thousand and ninety-eight guns, in weight
of metal twenty-one thousand five hundred and nineteen pounds, and
sixteen thousand six hundred and forty-seven men. Joyeuse, now joined
by Admiral Neilly, had twenty-six line-of-battle ships and smaller
vessels, carrying two thousand one hundred and fifty-eight guns, in
weight of metal twenty-five thousand five hundred and twenty-one
pounds, and nineteen thousand eight hundred and twenty-eight men. After
some skirmishing, on the 1st of June--"the glorious first"--Howe came
to close quarters with the enemy, who was compelled to fight by the
presence of the Conventional Commissioner Bon St. André. He ordered his
fleet to follow his ship, the _Charlotte_, in cutting right through
the enemy's line. Only five ships, however, accomplished this so as
to engage the French to the leeward, and prevent them from escaping.
Howe afterwards complained that some of his captains had not obeyed
his orders, and threatened them with a court-martial; but some replied
that their ships were in such bad sailing condition that they could
not effect this movement, and others that they did not understand
the signal. Thus, five vessels fighting to the leeward, and the rest
to the windward, the battle raged furiously from nine in the morning
till three in the afternoon, when the French admiral sheered off for
Brest, leaving behind seven of his finest vessels in the hands of the
British. The British lost in the action two hundred and seventy-nine
men, and had eight hundred and seventy-seven wounded. The French lost
in six of the captured ships alone six hundred and ninety men, and had
five hundred and eighty wounded. The seventh, the _Vengeur_, went down
almost as soon as the British flag was hoisted on her, with, it is
supposed, three hundred men in her. Altogether, it is likely that the
French did not lose less than fifteen hundred men, besides wounded,
and two thousand three hundred prisoners. The British lost a number of
officers, who were either killed in the battle or died afterwards of
their injuries Amongst these were Sir Andrew Douglas, second captain
of Howe's own ship; Captains Montagu of the _Montagu_, Hutt of the
_Queen_, and Harvey of the _Brunswick_; Rear-Admirals Pasley of the
_Bellerophon_, and Bowyer of the _Barfleur_. Admiral Graves and Captain
Berkeley were severely wounded. Howe made every effort to pursue and
bring the French admiral again to action; but, owing to the bad sailing
qualities of English ships at that time, and the shattered state of
many of them, he could not overtake Villaret, who made the best of
his way to Brest. During the remainder of the year there were various
engagements between small squadrons in different quarters, in which the
advantage generally remained with the British, besides the training
thus afforded to the officers and sailors for the mighty victories
which awaited them.
During the spring of 1794 the British, under Lieutenant-General Sir
Charles Grey, took the French island of Martinique, in which attempt
the Duke of Kent, father of Queen Victoria, distinguished himself. They
also took St. Lucia, Guadeloupe, and its dependencies, Marie-Galante,
Deseada, and the Saintes. But they were not so successful in assisting
the French Royalists in St. Domingo to expel the Republicans. They
beat the French in three successive battles, but our troops were
then attacked by the yellow fever. General Whyte made himself master
of the French capital, Port-au-Prince; but General Dundas, who was
appointed governor, was carried off by the fever, as also were numbers
of the troops. The French general also fell a victim to the fever;
but at this juncture arrived the Jacobin Commissioner, Victor Hugues,
with a reinforcement of from fifteen hundred to two thousand men. He
immediately assumed the command, proclaimed freedom to all the blacks,
and the plunder of the Royalists. The Royalists, terrified, submitted,
or only feebly supported their British allies, who were thereupon
compelled to yield them to their fate. Hughes, one of the bloodiest
of the French revolutionists, set the guillotine to work in the hands
of the negroes. The Royalists were beheaded or fusilladed in troops,
their houses burnt, and their estates ravaged. Before the end of the
year this monster had reduced the island to a dreadful desert. In
his ferocious fury, he had caused the very sick and wounded in the
hospitals to be massacred, and the dead to be thrown out of their
graves. Amongst these were the remains of General Dundas, and the
other dead British officers, which were flung into the river. Hugues
also recovered Guadeloupe, and perpetrated the same cruelties and
abominations there.
During this summer the island of Corsica fell into our hands, and that
by conduct as brilliant on the part of Nelson and the troops and seamen
under him, as was at the time the formal inefficiency of our generals
there. The Corsicans soon experienced the insolence and rapacity of
the godless French Republicans, and rose in general insurrection. The
patriot Paoli was the first to advise them to renounce all connection
with such a race of fiends, and was, in consequence, proscribed by
the Convention, but at the same time appointed General-in-Chief and
President of the Council of Government by his own people. As he well
knew that little Corsica was no match for France, he applied to the
British for assistance. Lord Hood was then engaged in the defence of
Toulon, but he sent a few ships and troops during the summer and autumn
to Paoli's aid, and by this assistance the French were driven out
of every part of the island except San Fiorenzo, Calvi, and Bastia.
The mother of Buonaparte, and part of the family, who were living
at Ajaccio, fled to France, imploring the aid of the Convention for
her native island. Lord Hood, however, having evacuated Toulon, made
haste to be beforehand with them. By the 7th of February, 1794, he
had blockaded the three ports still in the hands of the French, and
had landed five regiments, under the command of General Dundas, at
San Fiorenzo. The French were soon compelled to evacuate the place,
but they retreated to Bastia, without almost any attempt on the part
of Dundas to injure or molest them. Lord Hood now urged the immediate
reduction of Bastia, but Dundas, an incompetent officer, and tied up by
all the old formal rules of warfare, declared that he could not attempt
to carry the town till the arrival of two thousand fresh troops from
Gibraltar. But there was a man of very different metal and notions
serving there, namely, Nelson, who was indignant at this timid conduct.
He declared that if he had five hundred men and the _Agamemnon_
ship-of-war, he could take the place. Lord Hood was resolved that
he should try, whilst he himself blockaded the harbour. Nelson, who
declared his own seamen of the _Agamemnon_ were of the right sort, and
cared no more for bullets than for peas, had one thousand one hundred
and eighty-three soldiers, artillerymen, and marines, with two hundred
and fifty sailors, put under his command, with the title of brigadier.
They landed on the 4th of April, dragged their cannon up to the tops of
the rocks overhanging Bastia, to the astonishment of French, Corsicans,
and the timid Dundas. On the 10th Nelson was aloft with his whole
force, and with all his cannon in position. A body of Corsicans rather
kept guard than gave any active assistance on another side of the town;
for they had no cannon, or could not drag them up precipices like
British seamen. On the 11th Lord Hood summoned the town to surrender;
but the French commander and Commissioner, Lacombe-Saint-Michel,
replied that he had red-hot shot for the ships and bayonets for
the British soldiers, and should not think of yielding till he had
two-thirds of his garrison killed. But Nelson, ably seconded by Colonel
Vilettes, plied his artillery to such purpose, that, on the 10th of
May, Lacombe-Saint-Michel made offer of surrender, and on the 19th the
capitulation was completed. The French forces and the Corsicans in
their interest were shipped off to Toulon, after the signing of the
capitulation on the 21st; and now General D'Aubant, who had succeeded
General Dundas, but who had continued lying at San Fiorenzo instead of
assisting at the siege, came up with his troops and took possession
of Bastia. The whole loss of the British in this brilliant affair was
only fourteen men killed and thirty-four wounded. Calvi, the most
strongly-situated and fortified place, still remained to be taken. By
the middle of June it was thoroughly invested, both by sea and land,
and Nelson again serving on shore, assisted by Captains Hallowell and
Serecold, was pouring shells and red-hot shot into the fort. Captain
Serecold was killed at the very outset; but Nelson and Hallowell,
chiefly with the sailors and marines, continued the bombardment through
the terrible heat of the dog-days, and the enervating effects of
malaria from stagnant ponds in the hills, and compelled the surrender
on the 10th of August, but not before one-half of the two thousand men
engaged were prostrated by sickness. The island was now, by the advice
of Paoli, offered to the British Crown and by it accepted; but a gross
blunder was made in not appointing Paoli Governor, as was expected
both by himself and his compatriots. Instead of this most proper and
conciliatory measure, Sir Gilbert Elliot was appointed Governor, to
the disappointment and disgust of the Corsicans. Sir Gilbert attempted
to gratify the islanders by framing a new Constitution for them, and
granting them trial by jury; but neither of these institutions was
adapted to their ideas, and both failed to heal the wound which the
ignominious treatment of their great patriot occasioned.
[Illustration: CALVI, CORSICA.]
But this little episode of the war presented one bright spot amid
the vast picture of miserable mismanagement, want of concert and of
activity, amongst the Allies engaged against France. The campaign
of 1794 was most disgraceful and discouraging. The plan still was
for the different armies of the Allies to advance from the different
frontiers, north, west, east, and south, and concentrate themselves on
Paris; but all the activity and concentration were on the side of the
French. In the very commencement of it, it was observed that Prussia
was not bringing by any means the stipulated amount of forces into the
field. The king, thinking much more of securing his Polish robberies
than of co-operating against France, remained in Poland, and was even
discovered to be secretly negotiating with the French Convention for
peace. Britain was alarmed at this symptom of Prussian defection and
made strong remonstrances. Frederick William coolly replied that it was
impossible for him to go on without a large sum of money. The hint of
Prussia was not lost; money was promised, and in April of this year a
subsidy of two millions two hundred thousand pounds was paid to Prussia
to secure her more active operation, and on condition that she brought
into the field sixty thousand men. The bulk of this money was paid by
Britain, a small fraction by Holland; and what was the result? The King
of Prussia sent very few troops into the field, but employed the money
in paying and maintaining armies to keep down the invaded provinces of
Poland, and to invade more! Thus Britain was duped into the disgraceful
business of riveting the fetters of unhappy Poland; and it would have
been well had this taught the British Government wisdom. But it was now
intent on that astonishing career of subsidising almost all the nations
of Europe against France; of purchasing useless German soldiers at
astounding prices; of pouring out the wealth and blood of Britain like
water to enable the Germans and Russians to defend their own hearths
and homes, and in vain. The results of this subsidy ought to have
satisfied Britain, and would have satisfied any other nation; for it
did not long retain Prussia as an ally, even in name.
[Illustration: ST. JUST. (_After the Portrait by David._)]
Belgium, this summer, was the great battle-ground. In it were
Austrians, Dutch, British, and Hanoverians. At the opening of the
campaign the Allies had probably two hundred thousand men scattered
along the frontiers, and the French upwards of three hundred thousand.
But whilst the French were united in one object, and the Convention
kept pouring fresh masses of men in, the Allies were slow and
disunited. The Duke of York, who commanded the English and Hanoverians,
about thirty thousand men, was completely tired of the sluggish
formality of the Austrian general, Clairfait, and refused to serve
under him. To remove the difficulty, the Emperor of Austria agreed to
take the command of his forces in the Netherlands in person, so that
the Duke of York would serve under him. Francis II. arrived in April,
and great expectations were excited by his presence. Instead of urging
all the different divisions of the allied armies to concentrate in
large masses against the able generals, Pichegru and Jourdain, Francis
sat down before the secondary fortress of Landrecies, though the Allies
already held those of Valenciennes, Condé, and Quesnoy. This enabled
Pichegru to advance on West Flanders, and take Courtrai and Menin in
the very face of Clairfait. At the same time Jourdain had entered the
country of Luxembourg with a large force, and whilst the Austrians were
wasting their time before Landrecies, he was still further reinforced
from the army of the Rhine, which the absence of the King of Prussia
left at leisure, and he now fell upon the Austrian general, Beaulieu;
and though Beaulieu fought bravely for two days, he was overwhelmed by
successive columns of fresh troops, and driven from his lines. Jourdain
then advanced upon the Moselle, where the Prussians ought to have been,
and were not, in spite of the subsidy.
Pichegru, on his part, having driven back Clairfait, turned round
on the Duke of York, who lay at Tournay. There he met with a severe
repulse, and fell back with heavy loss; but Clairfait having again
advanced to regain Courtrai, Pichegru once more engaged and defeated
him. Clairfait then fell back into Flanders, to cover Ghent, Bruges,
and Ostend. Pichegru, urged on against his better judgment by St.
Just, who was the Commissioner from the Convention, sent Kleber and
Marceau across the Sambre to attack General Kaunitz; but Kaunitz gave
the French a severe defeat, killing four thousand of them; and had the
Austrians been as rapid as they were brave, they might have nearly
exterminated the whole of the French division. This success inspirited
the Allies to advance actively, but the Duke of York, not taking into
account the habitual slowness of German troops, shot ahead, expecting
to fall in with Clairfait's columns at Turcoing; but there he only
found the French, under Souham and Bonnaud, who well nigh enveloped
him by their vast numbers, totally defeated, and nearly took him
prisoner. This gave such a panic to the Austrians, that the entire
army fell back, and Francis II., thoroughly discouraged, withdrew from
the command and left it to the Prince of Coburg. The Duke of York
rallied, and maintained his ground at Tournay against Pichegru, and
Kaunitz followed up his advantage against Kleber and Moreau, driving
them across the Sambre; but these were only temporary successes.
Jourdain, finding no Prussians in the Moselle, drew nearer to the camp
of Pichegru. There were various conflicts at Ypres, Charleroi, and on
the plains of Fleurus. The Allies drove the French three times across
the Sambre, but they returned with fresh and never-ending forces, and
compelled the Allies to a general retreat. Bruges opened its gates to
the French; Pichegru, aided by Moreau, compelled the Duke of York to
retire successively on Oudenarde, Tournay, and Antwerp, places filled
with the fame of Marlborough. At Antwerp the Duke of York was joined by
Lord Moira, with ten thousand men, intended originally for La Vendée,
but too late to prevent the massacre of Savenay. The English garrison
quitted Ostend, and came round to Antwerp; and the British occupied
that town, whilst Clairfait lay at Louvain, and the two armies,
unitedly, protected Mechlin.
The French allowed the retreating Allies no rest. There was no want
of men. The Convention, by the menace of the guillotine at home, and
the promises of plunder and licence abroad, could raise any number of
thousands of men, could find millions of money, and they had not a
single feeling of humanity, as the streaming axes of the executioners
all over the country showed. They could also fight and daunt their
enemies by the same unhesitating ferocity. They had long published
to all their armies that no quarter was to be given to British or
Hanoverians--they were to be massacred to a man; and they now sent word
to the fortresses of Valenciennes, Condé, Quesnoy, and Landrecies, that
unless the garrisons surrendered every soul on their being taken should
be butchered. The fortresses were immediately surrendered, for the
menace was backed by one hundred and fifty thousand men--the combined
troops of Pichegru and Jourdain. Besides, the fortresses in the hands
of the Allies were so badly supplied both with ammunition and stores,
that they were but dens of famine and impotence. On the 5th of July
Ghent opened its gates to the French; on the 9th the French entered
Brussels, having driven the Duke of Coburg out of his entrenchments in
the wood of Soignies, near which the battle of Waterloo was afterwards
fought. They next attacked the Duke of York and Lord Moira at Mechlin,
and after a sharp conflict drove them thence. The very next day
Clairfait was defeated and obliged to abandon both Louvain and Liége.
General Beaulieu was driven out of Namur, solely because he had no
provisions there for his army, though otherwise the place could have
made a long defence. The Duke of York was compelled to abandon the
strong and important citadel of Antwerp from the same cause, and to
cross the Scheldt into Dutch territory, leaving the French to make
their triumphant entry into Antwerp on the 23rd of July. Such was the
brilliant campaign of the French in the Netherlands in the summer of
1794--such the ignominious defeat of the Allies, with an army of two
hundred thousand men. Pitt, however, bravely struggled to keep up the
Coalition. A loan of four million pounds was granted to Austria. At the
same time, in addition to the Hessian soldiers engaged, the Duke of
Brunswick, the king's relative, was to furnish two thousand two hundred
and eighty-nine men on the same liberal terms, and was himself to have
an annual allowance of sixteen thousand pounds sterling.
Those princes that did bring men into the field, such as the Hessians,
Brunswickers, etc.--the Menschen-Veräufer, or man-sellers, as they
were styled by their own people--were rapacious beyond example. During
the American war we had employed these Hessians, Brunswickers, and the
like, at a cost that excited general indignation. Besides paying seven
pounds ten shillings and a penny for every man, the Duke of Brunswick,
who furnished only four thousand and eighty-four men, had had an annual
subsidy of fifteen thousand five hundred and nineteen pounds. The
Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, who furnished twelve thousand men, had ten
thousand two hundred and eighty-one pounds a year.
It was towards the end of May before Marshal Möllendorf, the Prussian
general, began the campaign. He then attacked the French, and drove
them out of their entrenchments at Kaiserslautern with great slaughter.
There, however, his activity seemed to cease; and on the 12th of July
the French again fell upon him. He fought bravely for four whole days,
supported by the Austrians; but both these Powers were compelled to
retreat down the Rhine, the Prussians retiring on Mayence and the
Austrians crossing the river for more safety. The French marched
briskly after the Prussians, took Trèves, and then sent strong
detachments to help their countrymen to make a complete clearance
of Belgium and to invade Holland. Clairfait, who was still hovering
in Dutch Flanders, was attacked by overwhelming numbers, beaten
repeatedly, and compelled to evacuate Juliers, Aix-la-Chapelle, and
finally Cologne. The French were so close at his heels at Cologne that
they shouted after him that "that was not the way to Paris." Coblenz,
where the Royalist Emigrants had so long made their headquarters,
though strongly fortified, soon after surrendered. The stout fortress
of Venloo, on the Meuse, and Bois-le-Duc, as promptly surrendered, and
the French marched on Nimeguen, near which the Duke of York lay, hoping
in vain to cover the frontiers of Holland. The people of Holland, like
those of Belgium, were extensively Jacobinised, the army was deeply
infected by French principles, and to attempt to defend such a country
with a mere handful of British was literally to throw away the lives
of our men. Yet the duke stood stoutly in this hopeless defence, where
half Holland ought to have been collected to defend itself.
On the 19th of October the French attacked the duke with sixty thousand
men, and though his little army fought with its usual dogged bravery
it was compelled to give way. It did this, however, only to assume
a fresh position, still covering Nimeguen, where, on the 27th, the
French again attacked it, and compelled it to retire from the contest.
The duke led the wreck of his army across the Waal and the Rhine, and
posted himself at Arnhem in Guelderland, to throw some impediment
in the path of Pichegru, who was advancing, at the command of the
Convention, to reduce Holland. Nimeguen, full of Dutch traitors, soon
opened its gates; Maestricht did the same to Kleber; and at the end of
the campaign the gloomiest prospects hung over Holland.
In the south great successes had been won by the French. A formidable
attack was made on the territories of the King of Sardinia and the
position of Saorgio was turned. But another division of these French
descended from the Alps. It was the month of May when General Dumas,
with the army of the Alps, had forced his way through the defiles of
Mont Cenis. The Piedmontese garrisons of the forts there had fled
without much resistance, astonished and confounded at seeing the French
appear on the loftiest heights around them. The French pursued their
retreating troops as far as Susa, led on by Jacobinised Savoyards,
who hated the Piedmontese. But Dumas, finding that strong forces of
Piedmontese and Austrians, under the King of Sardinia and the Austrian
General Wallis, were drawn up at the foot of the Alps, did not venture
to descend into the plains. Another body of the army of Italy was
delayed some time in the Genoese territory, whilst Buonaparte was
employed in sounding the condition and intentions of the people of
Genoa. All the Alpine passes were in their hands, and Italy was doomed
to drink the cup of misery to the very dregs.
Whilst the French armies had been carrying bloodshed and misery into
the countries around them, their brethren at home had been equally
busy in pushing forward those mutual hatreds which appeared likely
to end in the extermination of the whole race of revolutionists. The
Girondists being destroyed, new divisions showed themselves in those
who had hitherto been allies--Robespierre and his coadjutors. Hébert,
Chaumette, Clootz, Ronsin, and others, began to raise their heels
against their chief, and their chief doomed every one of them to the
guillotine. His most important victim was Danton, a man by no means
contemptible (guillotined April 5th, 1794).
Robespierre believed that there was a majority of the Republicans who
thought they had gone too far in abolishing the Deity and setting up
the Goddess of Reason. He declared that the people needed festivals,
and immediately it was decreed that every decade should be celebrated
as a festival. A festival in honour of the Supreme Being inaugurated
this series of special holidays, and it was to be followed by festivals
to the Human Race, the French People, the Love of Country, Agriculture,
Necessity, Misfortune, Posterity, and various other qualities and
sentiments, each having one decade in the year. The first festival
to the Supreme Being was fixed for the 20th of Prairial, or 8th of
June. The painter David was commissioned to prepare the scenes and
ceremonies of the festival, which was enacted in the gardens of the
Tuileries. Robespierre, in his sky-blue coat and most showy waistcoat,
and carrying in his hand a grand bouquet of flowers mixed with ears of
wheat, led the procession and officiated as high priest. But though
Robespierre had proclaimed the reign of the Supreme Being, he had not
the least intention that it should on that account be any the more a
reign of mercy. In his speech at the festival of the Supreme Being,
he declared that the Republic must be still further purged--that they
must remain inexorable. On this point he and all his colleagues were
agreed, but they were agreed in nothing else. They immediately broke
into fresh schisms, as would necessarily be the case with such men,
who must go on exterminating one another to the last. Robespierre, St.
Just, and Couthon still hung together; but Barrère, Collot d'Herbois,
Billaud-Varennes, and most of the other members of the Committees of
Public Welfare and Public Safety, were in the very act of rushing into
opposition, and beginning a struggle with the triumvirate--Robespierre,
Couthon, and St. Just--to the death. St. Just advised Robespierre to
anticipate them, but he, relying on his authority with the Convention,
remained inactive. It was a fatal mistake. Barrère and his faction
determined to strike a decisive blow at Robespierre; and Tallien
volunteered to commence the attack on Robespierre in the Convention.
To Robespierre's utter astonishment, his friends were outnumbered, and
decrees were immediately passed for the arrest of Couthon, Lebas, St.
Just, Robespierre and his brother. He escaped and fled to the Commune.
For a moment it seemed as if a revolution would have restored him
to power. But the Parisians were weary of their tyrant, and on the
following day Robespierre with twenty members of the Commune perished
on the scaffold (July 28th, 1794).
No sooner had Collot d'Herbois, Barrère, and that party triumphed
over Robespierre than they summoned the members of the tribunal to
their bar--ay, on the very morning of the day of his execution--and
voted them honours amid much applause. The tribunal replied, that
though a few traitors like Coffinhal and Dumas had found their way
into the tribunal, the majority of them were sound and devoted to the
Convention. Accordingly, the next day the Convention handed over to
Fouquier-Tinville and his colleagues a list of fresh proscriptions of
sixty-nine municipals, and a few days afterwards--namely, the 12th of
Thermidor, being the 30th of July--they added twelve more, completing
eighty-one victims! These were all executed within twenty-four hours.
The Convention then fell into new divisions, some members contending
for its being time to cease these tragedies, others insisting on
maintaining them. Billaud-Varennes, Barrère, and Collot d'Herbois
defended the guillotine and Fouquier-Tinville, but the greater number
of the enemies of Robespierre denounced them, declared themselves the
overthrowers of Robespierre, and assumed the name of Thermidorians,
in honour of the month in which they had destroyed him. For the
Thermidorians saw that the better part of the public had become sick
of blood, and they set about contracting the Reign of Terror. They
reduced the powers of the two governing Committees; they decreed that
one-fourth of the members should go out every month; they reduced
the revolutionary sections of Paris from forty-eight to twelve, and
abolished the forty sous a day to the sansculotte patriots for their
attendance. A month after the execution of Robespierre, Tallien made a
fierce onslaught on the Terrorist system, and declared that there were
numbers yet living who had been equally merciless with Robespierre,
Couthon, and St. Just; and the next day Lecointre denounced by name
Barrère, Billaud-Varennes, and Collot d'Herbois. To put an end to the
Jacobin resistance, the Convention closed the Jacobin Club altogether,
which had thus only survived the fall of Robespierre about four
months. Thereupon the Jacobins began to denounce the Thermidorians as
anti-Republicans, but they retorted that they were Republicans of the
purest school--that of Marat.
[Illustration: PARIS UNDER THE REIGN OF TERROR: A VAIN APPEAL. (_After
the Picture by Paul Svedomsky_)]
Whilst these frightful horrors were taking place, Russia, Prussia, and
Austria had been completing the extinction of Poland. An ill-advised
attempt by the Poles for the recovery of their country had precipitated
this event. The Russian Minister in Poland had ordered the reduction
of the little army of that country, under its now almost nominal king,
Stanislaus Augustus, from thirty thousand to fifteen thousand. The
Poles resented this, without considering that they were unable, at the
moment, to resist it. Kosciusko was appointed Commander-in-Chief, and
he issued an order for the rising of the people in every quarter of
Poland, and for their hastening to his flag. At first, the enthusiasm
of the call to liberty and to the rescue of the common country gave
some brilliant successes. Kosciusko, on his march from Cracow to
Warsaw, at the head of only four thousand men, encountered a Russian
army of upwards of twelve thousand, and defeated it with a slaughter
of three thousand of the enemy. On the 17th of March, 1794, the Polish
troops in Warsaw attacked the Russian garrison, eight thousand strong,
and slaughtering more than half of them, drove the rest out of the
city, and Kosciusko marched in soon afterwards. A week later the
population of Lithuania, Kosciusko's native province, rose, and drove
the Russians with much slaughter from Wilna, its capital. But this
could not save Poland: its three mighty oppressors were pouring down
their multitudinous legions on every portion of the doomed country. The
Emperor of Austria marched an army into Little Poland at the end of
June, and an army of fifty thousand Russians and Prussians was in full
march on Warsaw. For a time, Kosciusko repulsed them, and committed
great havoc upon them on the 27th of July; again, on the 1st and
3rd of August. At the same time, Generals Dombrowski, Prince Joseph
Poniatowski, and other Polish generals, were victorious in different
quarters, and the King of Prussia was compelled to draw off his army,
forty thousand strong, from Warsaw, in order to recover Great Poland.
This gleam of success on the part of the Poles, however, was but
momentary. Their army in Lithuania, commanded by corrupt, gambling,
and gormandising nobles, was beaten at all points by the Russians,
and driven out of Wilna on the 12th of August. At the same time, the
savage Suvaroff, the man who had cried "Glory to God and the Empress!"
over the ruthless massacre of Ismail, was marching down on Warsaw.
Kosciusko had unwisely weakened his army by sending a strong detachment
under Dombrowski into Great Poland, and, attacking a Russian force
under Count Fersen, at Macziewice, about fifty miles from Warsaw, on
the 17th of September, he was utterly routed. He had only about twenty
thousand men, whilst Fersen had at least sixty thousand. But Kosciusko
was anxious to prevent the arrival of Suvaroff before the engagement,
and thus rushed into battle with this fatal inequality of strength. He
was left for dead on the field, but was discovered to be alive, and
was sent prisoner to St. Petersburg, where he was confined till the
accession of the Emperor Paul, who set him at liberty. The fall of
Kosciusko was the fall of Poland. Not even Kosciusko could have saved
it; but this catastrophe made the fatal end obvious and speedy. Still
the Poles struggled on bravely against such overwhelming forces for
some months. The ultimate partition treaty was at length signed on the
24th of October, 1795; some particulars regarding Cracow, however, not
being settled between Prussia and Austria till the 21st of October,
1796. Stanislaus Augustus was compelled to abdicate, and he retired,
after the death of Catherine, to St. Petersburg, with a pension of two
hundred thousand ducats a year. He died there in the month of February,
1798, only about fifteen months after his former mistress, the Czarina.
And thus Poland was blotted out of the map of nations.
In England there had been a coalition of what was called the Portland
section of the Whigs, with Pitt's Ministry. These Whigs had not only
separated from Fox and his friends, but they had, from the first
outbreak of the French Revolution, followed the lead of Burke and
supported all Pitt's measures. The Duke of Portland, therefore, was, in
July, made Third Secretary of State; Lord Fitzwilliam, President of the
Council, and, in December, Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland; Earl Spencer was
made, at the same time, Lord Privy Seal, and, in December, First Lord
of the Admiralty; Pitt's elder brother, Lord Chatham, being removed for
him, and made Privy Seal; and Windham became Secretary of War in place
of Sir George Yonge.
But this large infusion of Whiggery did not render the Administration
any the more liberal. It was determined to bring the politically
accused, now out on bail, to trial. On the 6th of October true bills
were found by the grand jury of Middlesex against Thomas Hardy,
the secretary of the Corresponding Society, John Horne Tooke, John
Augustus Bonney, Stewart Kyd, the Rev. Jeremiah Joyce, Thomas Wardle,
Thomas Holcroft, John Richter, Matthew Moore, John Thelwall, Richard
Hodgson, and John Baxter, for high treason. Hardy was put upon his
trial first at the Old Bailey, October 29th, before Chief Justice
Eyre, a judge of noted severity, Chief Baron Macdonald, Baron Hotham,
Mr. Justice Buller, and Mr. Justice Grose, with other judges. Sir
John Scott, afterwards Lord Eldon, as Attorney-General, opened the
case against him in a speech of nine hours. In this he laboured to
represent the Corresponding Society, and Hardy as its secretary, as
guilty of a treasonable intercourse with the French revolutionists,
and read numbers of documents expressing great admiration of the
French institutions. But these were merely the documents which had
long and openly been published by the Society, and were well known
through insertion in the newspapers. There was nothing clandestine
about them, nothing suggestive of a concealed and dangerous conspiracy.
Their invariable burthen was the thorough reform of Parliament, and
the utter disfranchisement of the rotten boroughs, by which the whole
representation of the country was transferred to the aristocracy. Next
a strong attempt was made to connect the secretary of the Society with
the men lately condemned in Scotland, especially Margarot, with whom,
as all undoubtedly engaged in the same object of Reform, Hardy, as
secretary, had considerable correspondence. The whole failed to impress
an English jury, and Hardy was acquitted after a trial of eight days.