SYLVESTER MALONE.

[We feel much obliged to our learned and reverend correspondent for the

interest he takes in the success and the accuracy of the _Record_, and

we beg to assure him that the greatest attention will be paid to every

communication and suggestion from him, or from any other promoter of the

study of Irish ecclesiastical literature or antiquities. In publishing

the _Record_, our only desire is to illustrate and uphold truth, and

thus to promote the interests of religion.

We regret that, our colleague who treated of the See of Clonmacnoise

in the January number being at present absent, we have not been able

to communicate to him the remarks contained in the above letter; we

can therefore only state that, as he was not treating of the fourteenth

century, he referred only incidentally to the appointment of Bishop

Symon in order to fix the period at which a change had been "_probably_"

effected in a matter of ecclesiastical jurisdiction connected with the

See of Clonmacnoise, and that he had no intention of giving the history

of the bishops of that diocese, or of entering into a question which

was not connected with his subject; so that, having fixed the date in

question with accuracy--as he does by referring to the appointment of

Bishop Symon to Clonmacnoise, as given by Theiner--it did not appear

necessary for him to proceed farther.

However that may be, we can safely promise in the name of our colleague,

that he will be happy to correct any mistake into which he may have

fallen. He will be able to do so the more readily because he has been

requested to publish in a separate volume all he has written on the

succession of the Bishops in the various Sees of Ireland. When corrected

and completed, these articles will be a valuable accession to our

ecclesiastical history, whilst they will supply a triumphant answer to

an assertion of the learned Dr. Todd in the preface to his _Life of St.

Patrick_, viz.: that the original Irish Church, having merged into the

Church of the English Pale, adopted the Reformation in the sixteenth

century. That assertion undoubtedly was made hastily and without

sufficient reflection. Any one who reads the articles of the _Record_

will find that it has no foundation in fact. Penal laws, indeed, and

brute force were employed to propagate the Reformation in Ireland, but

the true faith was so deeply rooted in the minds of the clergy and laity

of the "original Irish Church" that all the powers of Hell could not

exterminate it.

As to Bishop Symon, mentioned by our correspondent, it appears that he

was appointed in 1349 by Clement VI. to Derry, not to Kildare. According

to Ware, there was no vacancy in that year in this last see, as it was

occupied from 1334 to 1365 by Richard Hulot and Thomas Giffard. But in

the list of the Bishops of Derry given by Ware, a Bishop Symon, of some

order of friars, is mentioned as filling that see in 1367 and 1369. The

historian states that he could not discover to what religious order that

prelate belonged, or what was the date of his consecration. The valuable

documents published by the Archivist of the Vatican, F. Theiner, show that

Bishop Symon was of the Order of St. Dominick, that he was consecrated

by Talleyrand, Bishop of Albano, that he was appointed to Derry in 1349,

and that he succeeded a Bishop Maurice who was unknown to Ware. A copy

of the brief appointing Bishop Symon to Derry, was sent to the Archbishop

of Armagh, as appears from Theiner, p. 292. This shows that the

_Ecclesia Darensis_ conferred on Bishop Symon belonged to the province

of Armagh. Kildare, indeed, was called by the same name, but it belonged

to a different province. Theiner gives the appointment of a Bishop of

Kildare at page 261, in which reference is made to his metropolitan of

Dublin. At page 64 _Ecclesia Darensis_ is mentioned again, but it is

stated to belong to the metropolitan of Armagh. Thus, although Derry and

Kildare went by the same name, it is not difficult to determine to which

see the papal Bulls regarding them belong, because mention is generally

made of the metropolitan to whose suffragan the document is addressed.]

The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, March 1865 · 第 13 / 27 题