GENTLEMEN,

Be pleased to allow me to bring under your notice a slight mistake

noticeable in the January issue of your _Record_, and in doing so

I may be permitted to express my great satisfaction, and that of

all those who spoke to me on the subject, with the interesting and

varied matter in your _Record_. Your high character, not to speak

of stronger reasons, will secure for your statements a ready

acceptance with Catholics, and this, coupled with the very faultless

character of your extensively read periodical, renders me anxious

to have it the medium of correction to its own mistakes, however

slight. The learned writer on the Irish sees of the sixteenth

century, speaking of the vicissitudes of Clonmacnois, and of its

subjection to the metropolitical see of Tuam, says, in p. 158 of

the _Record_: "This change probably took place during the episcopate

of Bishop Symon of the Order of St. Dominick, who, though omitted

in the lists of Ware and De Burgo, was appointed to the see on

the death of Dr. Henry in 1349". Now, Symon was never Bishop of

Clonmacnois. Indeed, as remarked by the learned writer in the

_Record_, Theiner gives, in page 291, the bull of his appointment.

But the appointment was null, as the see was not vacant by the death

of Dr. Henry. Hence, by looking to the next page of Theiner, you

will see how good Pope Clement VI. acknowledges and rectifies the

mistake by appointing Symon to the see of Kildare, then vacant.

The report of Dr. Henry's death was unfounded; therefore, as

the bull of Pope Clement declares, Symon was not, and in the

circumstances could not have been, Bishop of Clonmacnois. "Cum

autem sicut postea vera relatio ad nos perduxit", etc., the Pope

says, addressing Symon, "tu nullius Ecclesiae remansisti".

I remain, Gentlemen,

Your obedient servant,

The Irish Ecclesiastical Record, Volume 1, March 1865 · 第 12 / 27 题