FRAXINUS BILTMOREANA Beadle. Biltmore Ash. (× 1/2.)]

=Distribution.=--This species has only recently been separated from the

white ash and its range has not been ascertained. It is known to occur

in the Appalachian Mountains from Pennsylvania to Georgia. In Indiana it

is known to occur as far north as Wells County. It is commonly

associated with the white ash, but much less frequent except in a few

districts where it is the prevailing type. Such a district is in Gibson

County north of Owensville. Here as well as in other parts of Gibson

County very large trees have been observed. In the original forest the

pioneers called the very large specimens of ash with deeply furrowed

bark "the old fashion" ash. It is believed that most of these specimens

were of this species. In the hilly parts of Indiana this species is

found in situations too dry for the white ash, and for this reason

should be given preference in hillside planting.

On the wooded bluff of White River in Fairview Park north of

Indianapolis is a specimen that measures 31 dm. in circumference, b.h.

The deepest furrows on the north side of the tree are 6 cm. deep.

=Remarks.=--This species is not yet commonly separated from the white

ash and is known to the trade as white ash. Mr. Beadle who first

recognized the species, named it Biltmore ash in honor of the Biltmore

Estate on which the first tree was discovered. Authors ever since have

so called it, and the common name which this form should bear is

Biltmore ash.

On the Clark County State Forest is a planting of sixteen year old white

ash in which are mixed quite a number of Biltmore ash. This species at a

distance, can be distinguished from the white ash by the rougher bark of

the trunks and the darker green color of its foliage, and in the autumn

by its more colored foliage. A closer view shows that the leaflets of

the Biltmore ash stand in a plane above the rachis higher than those of

the white ash.

The wood is not commercially distinguished from the white ash, but its

mechanical properties rank it somewhat below that species.[70]

[Illustration: Plate 126.

Trees of Indiana First Revised Edition (Publication No. 13, Department of Conservation, State of Indiana) · 第 175 / 265 题