Walter Scott tells us another anecdote, of a less tragic nature,

although he does not vouch for its authenticity. The story goes that the

gallant Claverhouse had heard of the fame of a certain Lady Elphinstone,

aged upwards of a century, and was very desirous to see her. Now the

centenarian was a staunch Whig, and required some persuasion to induce

her to receive the enemy of her party, but she, perhaps, had some

feminine grain of curiosity in her composition, and was tempted by the

notion of seeing the far-famed captivating monster.

In the course of conversation the soldier remarked that the lady, having

lived so long, must have witnessed many wonderful changes. ‘Hout na,

sir,’ answered the stout-hearted old Whigamore; ‘the warld is just wi’

me where it began. When I was entering life, there was ane Knox

deaving[2] us a’ wi’ his _clavers_,[3] and noo I am ganging out, there

is ane _Claver’se_ deaving us wi’ his knocks.’

Footnote 2:

_Deaving_, _i.e._ deafening.

Footnote 3:

_Clavers_, idle chattering.

There can be little doubt the old lady’s courage and humour were equally

appreciated by the General.

Lord Dundee married Jane, youngest daughter of Lord Cochrane, and (as

before mentioned) granddaughter of the first Earl of Dundonald, by whom

he had an only son, James, who succeeded to his father’s titles, but

died a few months after.

--------------

No. 138.

FREDERICK, KING OF BOHEMIA.

_Profile. Oval. Armour. White Collar, blue Ribbon and Order._

--------------

No. 139.

LADY ESSEX RICH, COUNTESS OF NOTTINGHAM.

BY SIR PETER LELY.

_Seated. Light blue dress. White sleeves._

SHE was the daughter, and one of the co-heirs of Robert Earl of Warwick.

She married (as his first wife) Daniel Finch, second Earl of Nottingham,

who afterwards succeeded his father (the famous Chancellor) as Earl of

Winchilsea. Lady Essex Rich had one daughter, married to the Marquis of

Halifax.

--------------

No. 140.

FIRST VISCOUNT WEYMOUTH.

DIED 1714.

_Black dress. Embroidered collar. Long hair. White sleeves._

--------------

No. 141.

MR. KELIFET.

_Dressed in black. Ruff. Pointed beard. Arms of Kelifet in corner

of picture._

THIS portrait is supposed to be that of Richard Kelifet, Esq. of ‘The

Place,’ Egham, county Surrey.

He was chief groom of Queen Elizabeth’s removing wardrobe, and yeoman of

Her Majesty’s standing wardrobe, and a most faithful servant of Her

Majesty, according to an inscription on his monument in Egham Church.

His daughter Cicely married Sir John Denham, Baron of the Exchequer, to

whom she brought ‘The Place,’ at Egham, as her dower.

In 1673 this house was occupied by a connection of the Longleat family,

John Thynne, Esq., when (we are told) ‘it contained many valuable and

curious pictures.’ This circumstance may possibly be a clew to the fact

that the portrait above-named finds a place in the collection of the

Marquis of Bath.

--------------

No. 142.

HENRY LORD BEAUCHAMP.

BY SIR PETER LELY.

BORN 1628, DIED 1656.

_Brown coat. White sleeves. Red mantle._

HE was the eldest son of William, second Duke of Somerset, by his second

wife, Lady Frances Devereux, eldest daughter of the Earl of Essex. He

married Mary, daughter of Lord Capel, by whom he had one son, William,

(who succeeded his grandfather as Duke of Somerset,) and three

daughters. Two died in infancy, and the third married Thomas Lord Bruce,

afterwards Earl of Ailesbury.

Lord Beauchamp died _vita patris_.

--------------

No. 143.

THE HONOURABLE LEOPOLD FINCH.

DIED IN 1689.

_In black, with white band._

FIFTH son of Heneage Finch, second Earl of Winchilsea, by Lady Mary

Seymour, daughter of William Duke of Somerset.

He was Warden of All Souls, Oxford. Married Lucy, daughter and co-heir

of John Davie, of Ruxford, in the county of Devon, and died without

children.

--------------

No. 144.

THE HONOURABLE LADY SAVILE.

_Blue mantle. White dress. Ringlets. Leaning against a tree._

DAUGHTER of Lord Keeper Coventry, married first Sir William Savile, and

afterwards Sir Thomas Chicheley of Wimpole, Cambridgeshire.

--------------

No. 145.

DON FERDINAND, CARDINAL INFANT OF SPAIN.

AFTER RUBENS.

BORN 1609, DIED 1641.

_Scarlet robes and cap._

WAS the son of Philip III., King of Spain, by Margaret, daughter of

Charles Archduke of Austria, and born at the Escurial.

When only ten years old he was created Cardinal Archbishop of Toledo,

and other dignities were conferred on him, which brought in enormous

revenues. His father on his deathbed sent for the little ecclesiastic,

and admonished him on the sacred nature of his duties. Ferdinand was

remarkable as a warrior, a politician, a connoisseur of art, a man of

pleasure, and much given to hospitality. He kept open house at his

country palace near Madrid, where he instituted a species of dramatic

performance, half-pageant, half-operatic, which took the name of the

Zarzuelas, from the country house in question. He studied foreign

languages, mathematics, philosophy, and strategics; loved books and

literary society, patronised the arts, studied painting himself under

Vincenzo and Carducho, and sat for his portrait both to Vandyck and

Rubens.

But the career in which he distinguished himself most was that of arms.

He was an enthusiastic soldier and an able general, and did good service

for Spain in the field, especially at the battle of Nordlingen, against

the Imperialists. Upon the death of the Archduchess Clara Eugenia,

Ferdinand Cardinal Infant succeeded to the government of the Low

Countries, and continued his military career with honour and success. A

parallel has been drawn between him and the Cardinal Ippolito de Medici,

natural son to Julian of that house:—Both ecclesiastics by profession,

and soldiers by choice; both remarkable for personal beauty, for

accomplishments as well as learning, fond of the fine arts, of society

and splendid living; both sat for their portraits in most unclerical

costumes,—Ippolito to Titian in the dress of a Hungarian noble,—see the

superb picture at Florence; the other to Rubens,—armed and mounted on

his charger, ready for the field. It was his boast, among other

successes, that he obliged the army of the Prince of Orange twice to

raise the siege of Guelders. He died the 6th of November 1641, when his

loving countrymen erected a gorgeous monument to his memory in the

cathedral at Toledo, seventy feet high, the work of Lorenzo Fernandez de

Salazar, with eulogistic inscriptions in various languages. The funeral

was conducted with great pomp. Canon Antonio Calderon pronounced the

funeral oration, speaking of him as one of Spain’s greatest men,—a hero,

a skilful general, a virtuous citizen. Nor did the preacher forget to

remind all good Catholics that the scene of Ferdinand’s most celebrated

victory was Nordlingen, where ‘the heretic Luther had preached his most

pestilent doctrines.’

--------------

No. 146.

ROBERT HARLEY, EARL OF OXFORD.

BY SIR GODFREY KNELLER.

BORN 1661, DIED 1724.

_Seated. Black coat and breeches. Wig. Star and ribbon of Garter.

Holding his wand of office. Left arm akimbo. Hat on table._

STUDIED under the famous Dr. Birch, who boasted of the number of

statesmen he had educated; showed great promise. In 1688 he raised a

troop of horse for the service of William of Orange, whom he joined, but

who showed him no particular favour. Harley sat in Parliament, but

waited for office till 1704, when Queen Anne gave him a seat in the

Council, and made him Secretary of State. He was much opposed to

Godolphin and Marlborough, and made common cause with the Queen’s new

favourite, Mrs. Masham, to overthrow the power of the Whigs.

The Ministers insisted on his dismissal, but the Queen stood by him as

long as she could. When Harley was compelled to resign, the Queen said

to him: ‘You see the unfortunate condition of monarchs,—they are obliged

to give up their friends to please their enemies;’ but so good was

Anne’s opinion of Harley, that she constantly consulted him on public

affairs, even when out of office.

On the downfall of the Whig Administration, he was made Chancellor of

the Exchequer, and Treasurer.

He was much censured, even by his own party, for some of his financial

measures, by which however he enriched the royal coffers. In March 1711

an event happened which made a great noise, and rendered Harley the hero

of the day. A French adventurer called Bourlie, or the Marquis de

Guiscard, was a shifty individual, who acted first as a spy of England

against France, and then of France against England, being in the pay of

both. His intrigues were discovered, and he was brought before the Privy

Council. Believing that Harley had been instrumental in his detection,

he resolved to be revenged. While waiting his turn for examination, he

found means to secrete about his person a penknife which was lying on

the table, among some papers. No sooner was he brought forward, than he

rushed in a fury upon Harley and stabbed him several times, the Minister

falling senseless on the ground, covered with blood. A scene of

confusion ensued, and the Duke of Buckingham, drawing his sword, wounded

the assassin, who was conveyed to Newgate, where he died in a few days,

either from the effect of the sword-thrusts or by his own hand.

The event seemed to have revived Harley’s popularity; both Houses

presented an address to the Queen, assuring her that Harley’s loyalty

had brought this attack upon him, etc. etc., and when he reappeared in

the House, a brilliant reception awaited him, and a Bill was passed

making an attempt on the life of a Privy Councillor a felony, which

deprived the offender of benefit of clergy. In the same year, Robert

Harley, being then Lord High Treasurer, was created Baron Wigmore, and

Earl of Oxford and Mortimer, and next year he received the Garter, and

became Prime Minister of England.

Lords Oxford and Bolingbroke at first worked together to withstand the

power of the opposition, and to bring about the pacification of Europe,

and the Peace of Utrecht added to the popularity of the ministerial

party; but dissensions arose between Bolingbroke and the Premier, and

recriminations and fresh intrigues, in which Mrs. Masham was implicated,

all of which belongs to England’s political history.

Oxford was deprived of all his offices, and accused of plotting in

favour of the Pretender. The Queen died, and in 1715 he was sent to the

Tower, on an accusation of high treason. He was imprisoned for two

years, and on his release gave himself up to the enjoyment of art and

literature. He formed a magnificent library, which cost him a fortune,

not only from the splendour of the works themselves, but on account of

their sumptuous binding. His collection of MSS., called after him the

Harleian MSS., which was afterwards greatly increased by his son, is now

one of the glories of the British Museum, purchased by the Government

after the second Lord Oxford’s death.

Few men have been more eulogised on the one hand and reviled on the

other, but he has been unanimously described as a kind patron of men of

letters.

It was Harley who brought into operation the measure known to posterity

as ‘The South Sea Bubble,’ which entailed ruin on numbers, and in spite

of much opposition he established State lotteries.

Lord Oxford was twice married, first to Elizabeth, daughter of Thomas

Foley of Whitley Court, county Worcester, by whom he had one son, and

two daughters; and, secondly, to Sarah, daughter of Thomas Myddleton,

Esq., who was childless.

--------------

No. 147.

LORD JOHN RUSSELL, AFTERWARDS

EARL RUSSELL, K.G.

BORN 1792, DIED 1878.

_As a young man. Resting his hand on the inner frame of the picture._

THE youngest son of Lord John Russell, afterwards sixth Duke of Bedford,

by the Hon. Georgiana Elizabeth Byng. Born in the very crisis of the

French Revolution, his uncle (the reigning Duke) was the champion of

French ideas, and having been carried far beyond the opinions of his

family, which for more than a century had been zealously Whig, both he

and his brother, young Russell’s father, settled that on John’s leaving

Westminster, he should go to the University of Edinburgh, Oxford and

Cambridge being too Tory in their proclivities to suit the family

traditions. By the time (we quote an able article in the _Times_ of

1878) the youth left College, his political faith had crystallised into

something very like that in which he consistently lived, laboured, and

died. A visit to the Peninsula, however, where the star of Wellington

was then in the ascendant, modified his French ideas and inspired him

with such an admiration for the hero, that ever afterwards, in the

fiercest political struggle, John Russell maintained towards the Duke

the attitude and language of profound respect, almost amounting to

veneration. On his return to England, while still under age, he sat for

Tavistock, and threw himself heart and soul into the Parliamentary fray

at one of the most eventful periods of the history, not only of England,

but of Europe, and of that history John Russell’s career forms a most

important feature. But our limited space will only allow us to glance at

the prominent events of his life. He was a zealous advocate for Catholic

Emancipation, and all Liberal measures, and from the very first threw in

his lot with those who demanded Parliamentary reform, in which cause he

was the primary mover, and the draught for the first Bill of which was

drawn up by his own hand. To his early efforts in this cause Macaulay

refers with his usual eloquence, saying: ‘Those were proud and happy

days, when amid the applause and blessings of millions, my noble friend

led us on in the struggle for the Reform Bill; when hundreds waited

round our doors till sunrise, to hear how well we had sped; when the

great cities of the North poured forth their populations on the highway

to meet the mails which brought tidings from the capital, whether the

battle of the people had been lost or won,’ etc. etc. Lord John Russell

sat for Tavistock, Hunts, Bandon, etc.; and was a member of the Lower

House for forty-seven years, during many of which he was the leader of

the Opposition. He filled at various times many of the highest offices

of State, Home, Foreign, Colonial, Lord President of the Council,

Commissioner to the Congress at Vienna, and First Lord of the Treasury

from 1846 to 1852. Once more Foreign Secretary in 1859, and again at the

head of the Government in 1865, he retired in 1866, having been raised

to the Peerage as Earl Russell and Viscount Amberley in 1861, and

receiving the Garter in 1862. He married, first, (in 1835,) Adelaide,

daughter of Thomas Lister, of Armitage Park, widow of the second Lord

Ribblesdale; she died in 1838, leaving two daughters. His second wife

was Lady Frances Elliot, daughter of Gilbert, second Earl of Minto, by

whom he had three sons and a daughter. Besides a drama, ‘Don Carlos,’

written in his youth, Lord Russell was the author of several literary

works, political, historical, etc. etc. He died at Pembroke Lodge in

1878. His latter years had been much embittered by the premature death

of his eldest son, Lord Amberley, and his wife (a daughter of Lord

Stanley of Alderley), within a few months of each other. They left two

little children, of whom one is the present Earl Russell.

--------------

No. 148.

A LADY.

_Seated. In a rich dress._

DOUBTFUL. Called the Countess of Stamford. Possibly Lady Ogle, married

to Thomas Thynne of Ten Thousand.

--------------

No. 149.

THOMAS THYNNE, ESQ.

BY SIR GODFREY KNELLER.

_Light brown coat. Long fair hair. Arm akimbo._

FATHER of the second Lord Weymouth.

--------------

No. 150.

MR. CONINGSBY, USHER OF THE BLACK ROD.

_Red cloak. Black skull-cap. Embroidered vest and gauntlets. Gold chain

and medal. Ruff. Holding a wand. In the background is the coat of

arms of the Coningsby family._

--------------

No. 151.

ELIZABETH, MARCHIONESS OF BATH.

HEAD BY SALISBURY.

BORN 1735, DIED 1825.

_White lace cap._

SHE was the eldest daughter of the Duke of Portland by Lady Margaret

Harley. In 1754 she married Thomas Thynne, first Marquis of Bath, by

whom she had a very large family. She survived her husband many years.

--------------

No. 152.

MR. COLE, HOUSE STEWARD.

UNCERTAIN.

_Brown coat. White wig. Writing. A seal lying on a book on the table._

--------------

No. 153.

PORTRAIT UNKNOWN.

--------------

No. 154.

ANNE BRUDENELL, COUNTESS OF SHREWSBURY.

BY WISSING.

BORN 1621, DIED 1702.

_Brown dress. White sleeves. Blue mantle._

THE daughter of Robert Brudenell, second Earl of Cardigan, by Anne,

daughter of Viscount Savage. She married Francis, eleventh Earl of

Shrewsbury, as his second wife.

De Grammont, in describing the beauties of the Court of the new Queen,

Catherine of Braganza, mentions Lady Shrewsbury in the first flight. She

seems to have surpassed most of the members of the royal circle in vice

and effrontery, and a long list is given by the author above quoted of

those who did not sigh in vain, but De Grammont says she was even more

remarkable for the misfortunes she brought on those with whom she had to

deal than for her conquests. The well-known wit and courtier, Thomas

Killigrew, after her desertion of him for the Duke of Buckingham, amused

himself by writing lampoons and speaking of her in a most unrestrained

manner. He had been admonished that such a proceeding would prove

dangerous, but persisted in his invectives. He was attacked one evening

on his return from the Duke of York’s at St. James’s by some assassins,

who made several sword-thrusts through his chair, one of which pierced

his arm. After this narrow escape he bridled his tongue and pen, but

sought for no redress, well aware the attempt would be fruitless.

Pepys tells us the Duke of Buckingham took Lady Shrewsbury to his house,

whereupon the Duchess, usually very sparing of her reproaches, remarked

it was not fit for her and the other to remain together under the same

roof, to which the Duke agreed, adding, ‘I have therefore, Madam,

ordered your coach to take you to your father’s;’—a speech which honest

Pepys designates as ‘devilish.’

Evelyn, in his account of his visits to Newmarket, ‘where was racing,

revelling, and feasting with jolly blades’ during the King’s residence

there, mentions the Duke of Buckingham with that abandoned woman,

Shrewsbury, with fiddlers, and the like, ‘all of which,’ he said, ‘did

ill become a Christian court.’

Her lover also installed her in his beautiful country house on the banks

of the Thames, to which Pope alludes—

‘Cliveden’s proud alcove,

The bower of wanton Shrewsbury, and love.’

But the incident by which she is best remembered is the famous duel,

which ended so fatally. Whether Buckingham’s boasts were too loud, when

he expatiated on the constancy and devotion of the hitherto fickle

beauty, or from some other cause, the patient husband’s indignation was

at length roused, and he sent a challenge to the Duke. We subjoin

Pepys’s account: ‘Much discourse of the duel between the Duke of

Buckingham, Holmes, and one Jenkins on one side, and my Lord of

Shrewsbury, Sir John Talbot, and one Bernard Howard, on the other. It

was all about my Lady Shrewsbury, who is, and hath been for a long time,

mistress to the Duke of Buckingham. The husband challenged him, and they

met yesterday, January the 16th, 1667, in a close, near Barne Elmes, and

Lord Shrewsbury is wounded, run through the body from the right breast,

through the shoulder, and Sir John, all along one of his arms, and

Jenkins is killed, and the rest all in a measure wounded.’ Pepys makes a

sapient remark on the subject: ‘This will make the world think that the

King has some good councillors about him, when the Duke, the greatest

man, is a fellow of no more sobriety than to fight a duel about a

mistress.’ He tells us that the King, having got wind of the matter, had

sent a message by the Duke of Albemarle to Buckingham, forbidding him to

fight, which message, like many others, was never delivered. ‘There was

great talk of the business, and Lord Shrewsbury’s case was considered

very bad, and if he should die, it might make it worse for the Duke of

Buckingham, and I shall not be much sorry for it, as we may have some

more sober man in his place, to assist in the Government.’

On the 16th of the ensuing March, Lord Shrewsbury died of his wounds.

There is a story currently believed, that his shameless wife held her

lover’s horse, during the duel, in the disguise of a page.

The Queen put herself at the head of a party that declaimed against the

Duke and his wicked transactions; but she was soon silenced, and the

whole matter hushed up.

Lady Shrewsbury lived to find a man adventurous enough to marry her, in

the person of the son of Sir Thomas Brydges of Keynsham, county

Somerset. She died at the age of eighty-one.

--------------

No. 155.

DOROTHY PERCY, COUNTESS OF LEICESTER.

AFTER THE VANDYCK AT PETWORTH.

DIED 1659.

_Seated. White satin gown. Blue mantle. Pearl ornaments._

She was the eldest daughter of Henry Percy, ninth Earl of

Northumberland, by Dorothy, daughter of Walter, first Earl of Essex, of

the Devereux family. She married in 1618 Robert Sidney, Earl of

Leicester.

Of her affection for her husband let her own letter speak, written

eighteen years after their marriage, when Lord Leicester was Ambassador

in Paris. She says, if she were not bound to entertain his messenger a

little, ‘I would bestowe one side of this paper in making love to you,

and since I maie with modestie expres it, I will saie that if it be love

to think of you sleeping and waking, to discourse of nothing with

pleasure, but what concerns you, to wishe myselfe everie hower with you,

and to praie for you with as much devotion as for mie owne sowle, then

sertainlie it maie be said that I am in love.’

Dorothy was indeed of a gentle and loving disposition, and of a

character in all respects strongly opposed to that of her sister, the

Countess of Carlisle, whom Sir Philip Warwick designates as ‘that busy

stateswoman,’ with other observations by no means flattering. Dorothy’s

tastes were of a more domestic kind, and her temper amiable and

peaceable. She could not, however, prevent a dissension which arose

between her brother Algernon Earl of Northumberland and her Lord, when

the latter was in Holstein. A letter addressed by Lord Leicester to his

brother-in-law shows plainly that he was not the implacable one in this

matter. After many assurances of friendship he goes on to say: ‘I

present a request to your Lordship, that you will make a visit to your

sister, my dear wife, if she be at Penshurst. That poor place has not

offended, that it should be forbidden the honour to receive you. She

hath not offended, that she should be deprived of the consolation and

delight that your Lordship’s company ever brings her;’ many more

arguments and conciliatory expressions going to prove that Leicester, at

least, desired to be reconciled; but Northumberland remained irate. We

may gather this from another letter, from Dorothy to her husband. ‘I

have not yet seen my brother,’ she writes, ‘he being full of the King’s

business, as he pretends, neither have I perceived any inclination to

drawe me from the solitarines I suffer in this place; for though I

expressed a willingnesse to go to him, yet have I received no manner of

invitation, which I take a little unkindlie. But I thanke God and you,

mie dearest harte, that the obligations I have received from frendes

have been small, and I hope mie necessities of the times maie not be

encreased. But of this coldnesse in my brother I will take little

notice, and content myself the best I can, with this lonelie life,

without enveing others their greatnesse, their plenty, or their

jollitie.... My best and most earnest praiers shall be offered for you,

and with your owne, which I believe are better than mine, I hope the

blessinges shall be obtained, which shall make us happy.’ We hear of her

afterwards visiting her husband in Paris, when the Queen of France

presented my Lady Leicester with a costly diamond.

Biographical catalogue of the portraits at Longleat in the county of Wilts, the seat of the Marquis of Bath · 第 20 / 22 段