ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS.

COMMEMORATION BIRTHDAY CONCERT.--The programme you are preparing, after

the fashion set the other evening in St. James's Hall, at an

entertainment organised in honour of the birthday of the poet BURNS, for

the purpose of paying a similar tribute to the memory of his great

fellow-countryman, Sir WALTER SCOTT, certainly promises well. As you

very truly point out that, as at the Concert which you are taking as

your model, though the name of BURNS was tacked on to nearly every item

in the programme, as if he had been responsible for the words, music and

all, it did not seem limited to the Poet's work alone, you might

certainly allow yourself the latitude you propose in arranging your own

scheme. The fact that, at the Burns Celebration, M. NACHEZ played his

own Hungarian dances, the connection between which and the Poet's

birthday is not, at first sight, entirely obvious, and that another

gentleman, with equal appropriateness, favoured the company with "_The

Death of Nelson_," on the trombone, seems certainly to give you a

warrant for the introduction you contemplate making, in commemoration of

Sir WALTER, of the Chinese Chopstick Mazurka, and the Woora-woora

Cannibal Islanders side-knife and sledge-hammer war-dance. It may of

course be possible, in a remote way, to introduce them, as you suggest,

into _Old Mortality_, but we should think you would be nearer the mark

with that other item of your programme, that associates _Jem Baggs_ with

_The Lay of the Last Minstrel_. Your idea of accepting and utilising the

offer of the GIRALFI family to introduce their Drawing-room

Entertainment into your programme seems excellent, and has certainly as

much in common with the Birthday of Sir WALTER SCOTT as the "_Death of

Nelson_," on the trombone, has with that of the distinguished Novelist's

great brother Poet. There is no reason, as you further point out, why

you should not organise a whole Series of Commemorative Birthday

Entertainments, as you think of doing, on the same plan, and with

BEETHOVEN, MACAULAY, Dr. JOHNSON, and WARREN HASTINGS, the celebrities

you mention, to begin upon, you ought to have no difficulty in working

in the solo on the big drum, the performance of the Learned Hyæna, the

Japanese Twenty-feet Bayonet-jump, and the other equally appropriate

attractions with which you are already in communication. Anyhow, begin

with Sir WALTER SCOTT, following the St. James's Hall lead, and let us

hear how you get on.

* * *

STRIKING WEDDING PRESENTS.--As you seem to think that a list of the

presents made to your young friends who are about to be married will in

all probability be published in some of the Society papers, "with the

names of the donors," we think, on the whole, we would advise you _not_

to give them, as you seem rather inclined to do, those three hundred

weight of cheap sardines of which you became possessed through a seizure

of your agents for arrears of rent. You might certainly present them

with the disabled omnibus horse that came into your hands on the same

occasion. Horses are sometimes given as wedding presents. There were

four down in a list of gifts at a fashionable marriage only last week.

But, of course, it would not suit your purpose to appear as the donor of

a "damaged" creature. We think, perhaps, it would be wiser to accept the

five pounds offered you through the veterinary surgeon you mention, and

lay out the money, as you suggest, in sixteen hundred Japanese fans. If

it falls through, and you find the horse still on your hands, there is

no need to mention its association with the omnibus. "Mr. JOHN

JOHNSON--a riding horse," doesn't read badly. We almost think this is

better than the fans. Think it over.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 98, February 8, 1890 · 第 14 / 23 题