TUNNELS DRIVEN EASTWARD FROM MANHATTAN.

_Materials and Inception of Work._--The materials encountered are shown

in the profile on Plate XIII, and were similar in all the tunnels. In

general, they were found to be about as indicated in the preliminary

borings. The materials met in Tunnel _A_ may be taken as typical of all.

From the Manhattan shaft eastward, in succession, there were 123 ft. of

all-rock section, 87 ft. of part earth and part rock, 723 ft. of all

earth, 515 ft. of part rock and part earth, 291 ft. of all rock, and 56

ft. of part rock and part earth.

The rock on the Manhattan side was Hudson schist, while that in the reef

was Fordham gneiss. Here, as elsewhere, they resembled each other

closely; the gneiss was slightly the harder, but both were badly seamed

and fissured. Wherever it was encountered in this work, the rock surface

was covered by a deposit of boulders, gravel, and sand, varying in

thickness from 4 to 10 ft. and averaging about 6 ft.

The slope of the surface of the ledge on the Manhattan side averaged

about 1 vertical to 4 horizontal. The rock near the surface was full of

disintegrated seams, and was badly broken up. It was irregularly

stratified, and dipped toward the west at an angle of about 60 degrees.

Large pieces frequently broke from the face and slid into the shield,

often exposing the sand. The rock surface was very irregular, and was

covered with boulders and detached masses of rock embedded in coarse

sand and gravel. The sand and gravel allowed the air to escape freely.

By the time the shields had entirely cleared the rock, the material in

the face had changed to a fine sand, stratified every few inches by very

thin layers of chocolate-colored clayey material. This is the material

elsewhere referred to as quicksand. As the shield advanced eastward, the

number and thickness of the layers of clay increased until the clay

formed at least 20% of the entire mass, and many of the layers were 2

in. thick.

At a distance of about 440 ft. beyond the Manhattan ledge, the material

at the bottom of the face changed suddenly to one in which the layers

of clay composed probably 98% of the whole. The sand layers were not

more than 1/16 in. thick and averaged about 2 in. apart. The surface of

the clay rose gradually for a distance of 40 ft. in Tunnels _A_ and _B_,

and 100 ft. in Tunnels _C_ and _D_, when gravel and boulders appeared at

the bottom of the shield. At that time the clay composed about one-half

of the face.

The surfaces of both the clay and gravel were irregular, but they rose

gradually. After rock was encountered, the formations of gravel and clay

were roughly parallel to the rock surface.

As the surface of the rock rose they disappeared in order and were again

encountered when the shields broke out of rock on the east side of the

Blackwell's Island Reef. East of the reef a large quantity of coarse

open sand was present in the gravel formations before the clay appeared

below the top of the cutting edge. In Tunnels _C_ and _D_ this was

especially difficult to handle. It appears to be a reasonable assumption

that the layer of clay was continuous across the reef. Wherever the clay

extended above the top of the shield it reduced the escape of air

materially. It is doubtless largely due to this circumstance that the

part-rock sections in the reef were not the most difficult portions of

the work.

While sinking the lower portions of the shafts the tunnels were

excavated eastward in the solid rock for a distance of about 60 ft.,

where the rock at the top was found to be somewhat disintegrated. This

was as far as it was considered prudent to go with the full-sized

section without air pressure. At about the same time top headings were

excavated westward from the shafts for a distance of 100 ft., and the

headings were enlarged to full size for 50 ft. The object was to avoid

damage to the shaft and interference with the river tunnel when work was

started by the contractor for the cross-town tunnel.

[Illustration: PLATE LXVI, FIG. 1.--REAR OF SHIELD SHOWING COMPLETE

FITTINGS.]

[Illustration: PLATE LXVI, FIG. 2.--SHIELD WITH LOWER PORTION OF

BULKHEAD REMOVED.]

The shields were erected on timber cradles in the shaft, and were shoved

forward to the face of the excavation. Concrete bulkheads, with the

necessary air-locks, were then built across the tunnels behind the

shields. The shields were erected before the dividing walls between the

two contracts were placed. Rings of iron tunnel lining, backed by

timbers spanning the openings on the west side, were erected temporarily

across the shafts in order to afford a bearing for the shield jacks

while shoving into the portals. The movement of the shield eastward was

continued in each tunnel for a distance of about 60 ft., and the

permanent cast-iron tunnel lining was erected as the shield advanced.

Before breaking out of rock, it was necessary to have air pressure in

the tunnels. This required the building of bulkheads with air-locks

inside the cast-iron linings just east of the portals. Before erecting

the bulkheads it was necessary to close the annular space between the

iron tunnel lining and the rock. The space at the portal was filled with

a concrete wall. After about twenty permanent rings had been erected in

each tunnel, two rings were pulled apart at the tail of the shield and a

second masonry wall or dam was built. The space between the two dams was

then filled with grout. To avoid the possibility of pushing the iron

backward after the air pressure was on, rings of segmental plates, 5/8

in. thick and 13-7/8 in. wide, were inserted in eighteen circumferential

joints in each tunnel between the rings as they were erected. The plates

contained slotted holes to match those in the segments. After the rings

left the shield, the plates were driven outward, and projected about 5

in. When the tunnel was grouted, the plates were embedded.

The bulkheads were completed, and the tunnels were put under air

pressure on the following dates:

Line _D_, on October 5th, 1905;

Line _C_, on November 6th, 1905;

Line _B_, on November 25th, 1905;

Line _A_, on December 1st, 1905.

This marked the end of the preparatory period.

In the deepest part of the river, near the pier-head line on the

Manhattan side, there was only 8 ft. of natural cover over the tops of

the tunnels. This cover consisted of the fine sand previously described,

and it was certain that the air would escape freely from the tunnels

through it. To give a greater depth of cover and to check the loss of

air, the contractor prepared to cover the lines of the tunnels with

blankets of clay, which, however, had been provided for in the

specifications. Permits, as described later, were obtained at different

times from the Secretary of War, for dumping clay in varying thicknesses

over the line of work. The dumping for the blanket allowed under the

first permit was completed in February, 1906. The thickness of this

blanket varied considerably, but averaged 10 or 12 ft. on the Manhattan

side. The original blanket was of material advantage, but the depth of

clay was insufficient to stop the loss of air.

The essential parts of the shields in the four tunnels were exactly

alike. Those in Tunnels _B_ and _D_, however, were originally fitted

with sectional sliding hoods and sliding extensions to the floors of the

working chambers, as shown by Fig. 1, Plate LXV. The shields in Tunnels

_A_ and _C_ were originally fitted with fixed hoods and fixed extensions

to the floors, as shown in Fig. 2, Plate LXV. A full description of the

shields will be found in Mr. Japp's paper.

The shields in each pair of tunnels were advanced through the solid rock

section about abreast of each other, until test holes from the faces

indicated soft ground within a few feet. As the distance between the

sides of the two tunnels was only 14 ft., it was thought best to let

Tunnels _B_ and _D_ gain a lead of about 100 ft. before Tunnels _A_ and

_C_ opened out into soft ground, in order that a blow from one tunnel

might not extend to the other. Work in Tunnel _C_ was shut down on

December 23d, 1905, after exposing sand to a depth of 3 ft. at the top,

and it remained closed for seven weeks. Work in Tunnel _A_ was suspended

on September 29th, 1905. By the time Tunnel _B_ had made the required

advance, it, together with Tunnels _C_ and _D_, was overtaxing the

capacities of the compressor plant. Only a little work was done in

Tunnel _C_ until July, 1906, and work in Tunnel _A_ was not resumed

until October 22d, 1906.

Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910 The New York Tunnel Extension of the Pennsylvania Railroad. The East River Tunnels. Paper No. 1159 · 第 16 / 35 题