Susan's sister Mary not only lent her all her savings, but spent her

summer vacation in New York in 1869, working in _The Revolution_

office while Susan, busy with woman suffrage conventions in Newport,

Saratoga, Chicago, and Ohio, was building up good will and

subscriptions for her paper. Concerned for her welfare, Mary

repeatedly but unsuccessfully urged her to give up. Daniel added his

entreaties to Mary's, begging Susan not to go further into debt, but

to form a stock company if she were determined to continue her paper.

She considered his advice very seriously for he was a practical

businessman and yet appreciated what she was trying to do. For a time

the formation of a stock company seemed possible, for the project

appealed to three women of means, Paulina Wright Davis, Isabella

Beecher Hooker, and Laura Curtis Bullard, but it never materialized.

* * * * *

With the financial problem of _The Revolution_ still unsolved, Susan

decided to make her appearance at Lucy Stone's convention in

Cleveland, Ohio, on November 24, 1869. Not only did she want to see

with her own eyes and hear with her own ears all that went on, but she

was determined to walk the second mile with Lucy and her supporters,

or even to turn the other cheek, if need be, for the sake of her

beloved cause.

Seeing her in the audience, Judge Bradwell of Chicago moved that she

be invited to sit on the platform, but Thomas Wentworth Higginson, who

was presiding, replied that he thought this unnecessary as a special

invitation had already been extended to all desiring to identify

themselves with the movement. Judge Bradwell would not be put off, his

motion was carried, and as Susan walked up to the platform to join the

other notables, she was greeted with hearty applause. Sitting there

among her critics, she wondered what she could possibly say to

persuade them to forget their differences for the sake of the cause.

After listening to Lucy Stone plead for renewed work for woman

suffrage and for petitions for a Sixteenth Amendment, she

spontaneously rose to her feet and asked permission to speak. "I

hope," she began, "that the work of this association, if it be

organized, will be to go in strong array up to the Capitol at

Washington to demand a Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The

question of the admission of women to the ballot would not then be

left to the mass of voters in every State, but would be submitted by

Congress to the several legislatures of the States for ratification,

and ... be decided by the most intelligent portion of the people. If

the question is left to the vote of the rank and file, it will be put

off for years.[247]

"So help me, Heaven!" she continued with emotion. "I care not what may

come out of this Convention, so that this great cause shall go

forward to its consummation! And though this Convention by its action

shall nullify the National Association of which I am a member, and

though it shall tread its heel upon _The Revolution_, to carry on

which I have struggled as never mortal woman or mortal man struggled

for any cause ... still, if you will do the work in Washington so that

this Amendment will be proposed, and will go with me to the several

Legislatures and _compel_ them to adopt it, I will thank God for this

Convention as long as I have the breath of life."

Loud and continuous applause greeted these earnest words. However,

instead of pledging themselves to work for a Sixteenth Amendment, the

newly formed American Woman Suffrage Association, blind to the

exceptional opportunity at this time for Congressional action on woman

suffrage, decided to concentrate on work in the states where suffrage

bills were pending. Instead of electing an outstanding woman as

president, they chose Henry Ward Beecher, boasting that this was proof

of their genuine belief in equal rights. Lucy Stone headed the

executive committee.

Divisions soon began developing among the suffragists in the field.

Many whose one thought previously had been the cause now spent time

weighing the differences between the two organizations and between

personalities, and antagonisms increased.

Hardest of all for Susan to bear was the definite announcement of a

rival paper, the _Woman's Journal_, to be issued in Boston in January

1870 under the editorship of Lucy Stone, Mary A. Livermore, and Julia

Ward Howe, with Henry Blackwell as business manager. Mary Livermore,

who previously had planned to merge her paper, the _Agitator_, with

_The Revolution_ now merged it with the _Woman's Journal_. Financed by

wealthy stockholders, all influential Republicans, the _Journal_,

Susan knew, would be spared the financial struggles of _The

Revolution_, but would be obliged to conform to Republican policy in

its support of woman's rights. Had not the _Woman's Journal_ been such

an obvious affront to the heroic efforts of _The Revolution_ and a

threat to its very existence, she could have rejoiced with Lucy over

one more paper carrying the message of woman suffrage.

More determined than ever to continue _The Revolution_, Susan

redoubled her efforts, announcing an imposing list of contributors

for 1870, including the British feminist, Lydia Becker, and as a

special attraction, a serial by Alice Cary. Through the efforts of

Mrs. Hooker, Harriet Beecher Stowe was persuaded to consider serving

as contributing editor provided the paper's name was changed to _The

True Republic_ or to some other name satisfactory to her.[248]

Having struggled against the odds for so long, Susan had no intention

of being stifled now by Mrs. Stowe's more conservative views, nor

would she give her crusading sheet an innocuous name. However, the

decision was taken out of her hands by _The Revolution's_ coverage of

the sensational McFarland-Richardson murder case, which so shocked

both Mrs. Hooker and Mrs. Stowe that they gave up all thought of being

associated in a publishing venture with Susan or Mrs. Stanton.

The whole country was stirred in December 1869 by the fatal shooting

in the _Tribune_ office of the well-known journalist, Albert D.

Richardson, by Daniel McFarland, to whose divorced wife Richardson had

been attentive. When just before his death, Richardson was married to

the divorced Mrs. McFarland by Henry Ward Beecher with Horace Greeley

as a witness, the press was agog. So strong was the feeling against a

divorced woman that Henry Ward Beecher was severely condemned for

officiating at the marriage, and Mrs. Richardson was played up in the

press and in court as the villain, although her divorce had been

granted because of the brutality and instability of McFarland.

Indignant at the sophistry of the press and the general acceptance of

a double standard of morals, _The Revolution_ not only spoke out

fearlessly in defense of Mrs. Richardson but in an editorial by Mrs.

Stanton frankly analyzed the tragic human relations so obvious in the

case. With Susan's full approval, Mrs. Stanton wrote, "I rejoice over

every slave that escapes from a discordant marriage. With the

education and elevation of women we shall have a mighty sundering of

the unholy ties that hold men and women together who loathe and

despise each other...."[249] When the court acquitted McFarland,

giving him the custody of his twelve-year-old son, Susan called a

protest meeting which attracted an audience of two thousand.

Such words and such activities disturbed many who sympathized with

Mrs. Richardson but saw no reason for flaunting exultant approval of

divorce in a woman suffrage paper, and they turned to the _Woman's

Journal_ as more to their taste.

Susan, however, reading the first number of the _Woman's Journal_,

found its editorials lacking fire. She rebelled at Julia Ward Howe's

counsel, "to lay down all partisan warfare and organize a peaceful

Grand Army of the Republic of Women ... not ... as against men, but as

against all that is pernicious to men and women."[250] Susan's fight

had never been against men but against man-made laws that held women

in bondage. There had always been men willing to help her. Experience

had taught her that the struggle for woman's rights was no peaceful

academic debate, but real warfare which demanded political strategy,

self-sacrifice, and unremitting labor. She was prouder than ever of

her _Revolution_ and its liberal hard-hitting policy.

* * * * *

Convinced that the National Woman Suffrage Association must publicize

its existence and its value, Susan began the year 1870 with a

convention in Washington which even Senator Sumner praised as

exceeding in interest anything he had ever witnessed there. Its

striking demonstration of the vitality and intelligence of the

National Association was the best answer she could possibly have given

to the accusations and criticism aimed at her and her organization.

Jessie Benton Frémont, watching the delegates enter the dining room of

the Arlington Hotel, called Susan over to her table and said with a

twinkle in her eyes, "Now, tell me, Miss Anthony, have you hunted the

country over and picked out and brought to Washington a score of the

most beautiful women you could find?"[251]

They were a fine-looking and intelligent lot--Paulina Wright Davis,

Isabella Beecher Hooker, Josephine Griffin of the Freedman's Bureau,

Charlotte Wilbour, Matilda Joslyn Gage, Martha C. Wright, and Olympia

Brown; Phoebe Couzins and Virginia Minor from Missouri, Madam Annekè

from Wisconsin, and best of all to Susan, Elizabeth Cady Stanton.

Their presence, their friendship and allegiance were a source of great

pride and joy. Elizabeth Stanton had come from St. Louis, interrupting

her successful lecture tour, when she much preferred to stay away from

all conventions. She had written Susan, "Of course, I stand by you to

the end. I would not see you crushed by rivals even if to prevent it

required my being cut into inch bits.... No power in heaven, hell or

earth can separate us, for our hearts are eternally wedded

together."[252]

Also at this convention to show his support of Susan and her program,

was her faithful friend of many years, the Rev. Samuel J. May of

Syracuse. Clara Barton, ill and unable to attend, sent a letter to be

read, an appeal to her soldier friends for woman suffrage.

Not only did the large and enthusiastic audiences show a growing

interest in votes for women, but two great victories for women in

1869, one in Great Britain and the other in the United States, brought

to the convention a feeling of confidence. Women taxpayers had been

granted the right to vote in municipal elections in England, Scotland,

and Wales, through the efforts of Jacob Bright. In the Territory of

Wyoming, during the first session of its legislature, women had been

granted the right to vote, to hold office, and serve on juries, and

married women had been given the right to their separate property and

their earnings. This progressive action by men of the West turned

Susan's thoughts hopefully to the western territories, and early in

1870 when the Territory of Utah enfranchised its women, she had

further cause for rejoicing.

To celebrate these victories for which her twenty years' work for

women had blazed the trail, some of her friends held a reception for

her in New York at the Women's Bureau on her fiftieth birthday. She

was amazed at the friendly attention her birthday received in the

press. "Susan's Half Century," read a headline in the _Herald_. The

_World_ called her the Moses of her sex. "A Brave Old Maid," commented

the _Sun_. But it was to the _Tribune_ that she turned with special

interest, always hoping for a word of approval from Horace Greeley and

finding at last this faint ray of praise: "Careful readers of the

_Tribune_ have probably succeeded in discovering that we have not

always been able to applaud the course of Miss Susan B. Anthony.

Indeed, we have often felt, and sometimes said that her methods were

as unwise as we thought her aims undesirable. But through these years

of disputation and struggling. Miss Anthony has thoroughly impressed

friends and enemies alike with the sincerity and earnestness of her

purpose...."[253]

To Anna E. Dickinson, far away lecturing, Susan confided, "Oh, Anna, I

am so glad of it all because it will teach the young girls that to be

true to principle--to live an idea, though an unpopular one--that to

live single--without any man's name--may be honorable."[254]

A few of Susan's younger colleagues still insisted that a merger of

the National and American Woman Suffrage Associations might be

possible. Again Theodore Tilton undertook the task of mediation and

Lucretia Mott, who had retired from active participation in the

woman's rights movement, tried to help work out a reconciliation.

Susan was skeptical but gave them her blessing. Representatives of the

American Association, however, again made it plain that they were

unwilling to work with Susan and Mrs. Stanton.[255]

By this time _The Revolution_ had become an overwhelming financial

burden. For some months Mrs. Stanton had been urging Susan to give it

up and turn to the lecture field, as she had done, to spread the

message of woman's rights. Susan hesitated, unwilling to give up _The

Revolution_ and not yet confident that she could hold the attention of

an audience for a whole evening. However, she found herself a great

success when pushed into several Lyceum lecture engagements in

Pennsylvania by Mrs. Stanton's sudden illness. "Miss Anthony evidently

lectures not for the purpose of receiving applause," commented the

Pittsburgh _Commercial_, "but for the purpose of making people

understand and be convinced. She takes her place on the stage in a

plain and unassuming manner and speaks extemporaneously and fluently,

too, reminding one of an old campaign speaker, who is accustomed to

talk simply for the purpose of converting his audience to his

political theories. She used plain English and plenty of it.... She

clearly evinced a quality that many politicians lack--sincerity."[256]

For each of these lectures on "Work, Wages, and the Ballot," she

received a fee of $75 and was able as well to get new subscribers for

_The Revolution_. She now saw the possibilities for herself and the

cause in a Lyceum tour, and when the Lyceum Bureau, pleased with her

reception in Pennsylvania wanted to book her for lectures in the West,

she accepted, calling Parker Pillsbury back to _The_ _Revolution_ to

take charge. All through Illinois she drew large audiences and her

fees increased to $95, $125, and $150. In two months she was able to

pay $1,300 of _The Revolution's_ debt.

When she returned to New York, she realized that she could not

continue to carry _The Revolution_ alone, in spite of increased

subscriptions. Its $10,000 debt weighed heavily upon her. Parker

Pillsbury's help could only be temporary; Mrs. Stanton's strenuous

lecture tour left her little time to give to the paper; and Susan's

own friends and family were unable to finance it further.

Fortunately the idea of editing a paper appealed strongly to the

wealthy Laura Curtis Bullard, who had the promise of editorial help

from Theodore Tilton. Susan now turned the paper over to them

completely, receiving nothing in return but shares of stock, while she

assumed the entire indebtedness.

Giving up the control of her beloved paper was one of the most

humiliating experiences and one of the deepest sorrows she ever faced.

_The Revolution_ had become to her the symbol of her crusade for

women. Overwhelmed by a sense of failure, she confided to her diary on

the date of the transfer, "It was like signing my own death warrant,"

and to a friend she wrote, "I feel a great, calm sadness like that of

a mother binding out a dear child that she could not support."[257]

She made a valiant announcement of the transfer in _The Revolution_ of

May 26, 1870, expressing her delight that the paper had at last found

financial backing and a new, enthusiastic editor. "In view of the

active demand for conventions, lectures, and discussions on Woman

Suffrage," she added, "I have concluded that so far as my own personal

efforts are concerned, I can be more useful on the platform than in a

newspaper. So, on the 1st of June next, I shall cease to be the _sole_

proprietor of _The Revolution_, and shall be free to attend public

meetings where ever so plain and matter of fact an old worker as I am

can secure a hearing."[258]

Financial backing, however, did not put _The Revolution_ on its feet,

although its forthright editorials and articles were replaced by spicy

and brilliant observations on pleasant topics which offended no one.

Before the year was up, Mrs. Bullard was making overtures to Susan to

take the paper back. Susan wanted desperately "to keep the Old Ship

Revolution's colors flying"[259] and to bring back Mrs. Stanton's

stinging editorials. She also feared that Mrs. Bullard on Theodore

Tilton's advice might turn the paper over to the Boston group to be

consolidated with the _Woman's Journal_. As no funds were available,

she had to turn her back on her beloved paper and hope for the best.

"I suppose there is a wise Providence in my being stripped of power to

go forward," she wrote at this time. "At any rate, I mean to try and

make good come out of it."[260]

For one more year, _The Revolution_ struggled on under the editorship

of Mrs. Bullard and Theodore Tilton and then was taken over by the

_Christian Enquirer_. The $10,000 debt, incurred under Susan's

management, she regarded as her responsibility, although her brother

Daniel and many of her friends urged bankruptcy proceedings. "My pride

for women, to say nothing of my conscience," she insisted, "says

no."[261]

FOOTNOTES:

[240] Lucy Stone to Frank Sanborn, Aug. 18, 1869, Alma Lutz

Collection.

[241] Lucy Stone to Esther Pugh, Aug. 30, 1869, Ida Husted Harper

Collection, Henry E. Huntington Library, San Marino, California.

[242] Mary Livermore to W. L. Garrison, Oct. 4, 1869, Boston Public

Library. Wendell Phillips did not sign the call or attend the

convention for "reasons that are good to him," wrote Lucy Stone to

Garrison, Sept. 27, 1869, Boston Public Library.

[243] _The Revolution_, IV, Oct. 21, 1869, p. 265.

[244] _Ibid._, p. 266.

[245] The Empire Sewing Machine Co., Benedict's Watches, Madame

Demorest's dress patterns, Sapolio, insurance companies, savings

banks, the Union Pacific, offering first mortgage bonds.

[246] Harper, _Anthony_, I, pp. 354-355. In 1873, Anson Lapham

cancelled notes, amounting to $4000, and praised Susan for her

continued courageous work for women.

[247] _The Revolution_, IV, Dec. 2, 1869, p. 343.

[248] Harriet Beecher Stowe to Susan B. Anthony, Dec., 1869, Alma Lutz

Collection.

[249] _The Revolution_, IV, Dec. 23, 1869, p. 385.

[250] _Woman's Journal_, Jan. 8, 1870.

[251] Ms., Diary, Jan. 18, 1870.

[252] Stanton and Blatch, _Stanton_, II, pp. 124-125.

[253] _The Revolution_, V, Feb. 24, 1870, pp. 117-118. Susan

attributed the _Tribune_ editorial to Whitelaw Reid. Susan B. Anthony

Scrapbook, Library of Congress.

[254] Feb. 21, 1870, Anna E. Dickinson Papers, Library of Congress.

Anna E. Dickinson sent Miss Anthony generous checks to help finance

_The Revolution_. Although she lectured at Cooper Union for the

National Woman Suffrage Association shortly after it was organized,

she never became a member of the organization or attended its

conventions. This was a great disappointment to Miss Anthony.

[255] Finally, Miss Anthony and Mrs. Stanton against their best

judgment were persuaded by younger members of the National Woman

Suffrage Association to drop the name National and replace it with

Union and then to try to negotiate further with the American

Association. Theodore Tilton was elected president of the Union Woman

Suffrage Society. This proved to be an organization in name only, and

in a short time these same younger members clamored for the return to

office of Miss Anthony and Mrs. Stanton and reestablished the National

Woman Suffrage Association.

[256] _The Revolution_, V, March 10, 1870, p. 153. Mrs. Stanton's

Lyceum lectures were undertaken to finance the education of her 7

children.

[257] Harper, _Anthony_, I, p. 362.

[258] _The Revolution_, V, May 26, 1870, p. 328.

[259] Sept. 19, 1870, Anna E. Dickinson Papers, Library of Congress.

[260] To E. A. Studwell, Sept. 15, 1870, Radcliffe Women's Archives,

Cambridge, Massachusetts.

[261] To Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Oct. 15, 1871, Lucy E. Anthony

Collection

A NEW SLANT ON THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

While Susan was lecturing in the West, hoping to earn enough to pay

off _The Revolution's_ debt, she was pondering a new approach to the

enfranchisement of women which had been proposed by Francis Minor, a

St. Louis attorney and the husband of her friend, Virginia Minor.

Francis Minor contended that while the Constitution gave the states

the right to regulate suffrage, it nowhere gave them the power to

prohibit it, and he believed that this conclusion was strengthened by

the Fourteenth Amendment which provided that "no State shall make or

enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of

citizens of the United States."

To claim the right to vote under the Fourteenth Amendment made a great

appeal to both Susan and Elizabeth Stanton. Susan published Francis

Minor's arguments in _The Revolution_ and also his suggestion that

some woman test this interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment by

attempting to vote at the next election; while Mrs. Stanton used this

new approach as the basis of her speech before a Congressional

committee in 1870.

With such a fresh and thrilling project to develop, Susan looked

forward to the annual woman suffrage convention to be held in

Washington in January 1871. So heavy was her lecture schedule that she

reluctantly left preparations for the convention in the willing hands

of Isabella Beecher Hooker, who was confident she could improve on

Susan's meetings and guide the woman's rights movement into more

ladylike and aristocratic channels, winning over scores of men and

women who hitherto had remained aloof. At the last moment, however,

she appealed in desperation to Susan for help, and Susan, canceling

important lecture engagements, hurried to Washington. Here she found

the newspapers full of Victoria C. Woodhull and her Memorial to

Congress on woman suffrage, which had been presented by Senator Harris

of Louisiana and Congressman Julian of Indiana. Capitalizing on the

new approach to woman suffrage, Mrs. Woodhull based her arguments on

the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, praying Congress to enact

legislation to enable women to exercise the right to vote vested in

them by these amendments. A hearing was scheduled before the House

judiciary committee the very morning the convention opened.

[Illustration: Victoria C. Woodhull]

Convinced that she and her colleagues must attend that hearing, Susan

consulted with her friends in Congress and overrode Mrs. Hooker's

hesitancy about associating their organization with so questionable a

woman as Victoria Woodhull. She engaged a constitutional lawyer,

Albert G. Riddle,[262] to represent the 30,000 women who had

petitioned Congress for the franchise. Then she and Mrs. Hooker

attended the hearing and asked for prompt action on woman suffrage.

This was the first Congressional hearing on federal enfranchisement.

Previous hearings had considered trying the experiment only in the

District of Columbia.

Susan had never before seen Victoria Woodhull. Early in 1870, however,

she had called at the brokerage office which Victoria and her sister,

Tennessee Claflin, had opened in New York on Broad Street. The press

had been full of amused comments regarding the lady bankers, and

Susan had wanted to see for herself what kind of women they were. Here

she met and talked with Tennessee Claflin, publishing their interview

in _The Revolution_, and also an advertisement of Woodhull, Claflin &

Co., Bankers and Brokers.[263]

Susan B. Anthony Rebel, Crusader, Humanitarian · 第 16 / 30 段