CHAPTER VI

EVERYBODY'S NEIGHBOR

"Friends are an expensive luxury; and when a man's whole

capital is invested in a calling and a mission in life, he

cannot afford to keep them. The costliness of keeping

friends does not lie in what one does for them, but in what

one, out of consideration for them, refrains from doing.

This means the crushing of many an intellectual germ."

IBSEN: _Letter to Brandes_,1870.

And now, behold the burgeoning, the efflorescence of the Mark Twain that

all America knew! Forgotten, deeply buried, is the "queer, fanciful,

uncommunicative child" of earlier days, forgotten is the grave and

passionate young poet of the Mississippi, the pilot, even the miner who

used to go off by himself and brood among those vague thoughts of his.

Forgotten is the young poet and still unborn is the cynical philosopher

of the years to come. Now, and for at least one glowing decade, Mark

Twain finds himself, as he says, "thoroughly and uniformly and

unceasingly happy." He has not faced the conflict in his own soul, he

has simply surrendered and repressed his leading instinct, and every

great surrender brings with it a sensation of more or less joyous

relief: were it not for the bitterness which that repression is destined

to engender, who could regret indeed that he has found in quotidian

interests and affections and appetites so complete an escape from the

labors and the struggles of the creative spirit? Meanwhile, as his

individuality sinks back, the race-character emerges; he reverts to

type, and everything characteristic of his pioneer heritage, his pioneer

environment, comes to the surface in him. It is like a sudden flowering

in his nature of all the desires of those to whom his own desire has,

from the outset of his life, subjected itself!

Mr. Herbert Croly, in his life of Mark Hanna, has described that worthy

as the typical pioneer business man. "Personalities and associations,"

he says, "composed the substance" of Mark Hanna's life; "his disposition

was active, sympathetic, and expansive; and it was both uncritical and

uncalculating. He accepted from his surroundings the prevailing ideas

and modes of action"; he had "an instinctive disposition towards an

expansive, all-round life." Such was the character of "Boss Hanna";

trait by trait, it had now become the prevailing character of Mark

Twain. Had he not endeavored to make himself over into another person, a

person in whom his family might take pride and pleasure? He had striven

to satisfy their standards, to do and feel and think and admire as they

did and felt and thought and admired; and at last the metamorphosis had,

to all appearances, taken place. Mark Twain had become primarily the

husband, the father, and the business man with responsibilities, the

purpose of whose writing was to please his friends, make money, and

entertain his own household. That vast, unemployed artistic energy of

his, however, which had not found its proper channel, overflowed this

narrow mold. Mark Twain was like a stream dammed in mid-career; and so

powerful was that unconscious current which had been checked that

instead of turning into a useful mill-pond he became a flood.

We have seen that his home had always been the hub of Mark Twain's

universe. "Upset and disturbed" as he often was, says Mr. Paine, "he

seldom permitted his distractions to interfere with the program of his

fireside." It was there, indeed, that all the latent poetry of his

nature, the poetry that so seldom got into his books, found its vent.

"To us," he wrote once, "our house was not unsentient matter--it had a

heart and a soul and eyes to see us with, and approvals and solicitudes

and deep sympathies; it was of us, and we were in its confidence, and

lived in its grace and in the peace of its benediction. We never came

home from an absence that its face did not light up and speak out its

eloquent welcome--and we could not enter it unmoved." It is evident from

this how much of the energy of Mark Twain's imagination had passed

neither into his art nor, exactly, into his love, but rather into the

worship of the hearth itself as the symbol, one might say, of his one

great piety. "From the very beginning," says Mr. Paine, "Mark Twain's

home meant always more to him than his work": indeed, in the name of his

domestic ties, he had as completely surrendered his individuality as any

monk in the name of religion. Naturally his home was important to him;

it had become the spring of all his motives and all his desires. And

having accepted the rôle of the opulent householder, he threw into it as

much energy as two ordinary men are able to throw into their life-work.

Mark Twain had accepted his father-in-law's challenge: he was not going

to fall behind the pace set by a coal-merchant whose household expenses

were $40,000 a year. No one ever delighted more than he now in living up

to those principles of "the conspicuous consumption of goods,"

"predatory emulation" and "the pecuniary canons of taste" which,

according to Mr. Veblen, actuate the propertied class. "A failure to

increase one's visible consumption when the means for an increase are at

hand is felt in popular apprehension," says Mr. Veblen, "to call for

explanation, and unworthy motives of miserliness are imputed to those

who fall short in this respect." Of course Mark Twain couldn't stand

that! As early as 1875 he writes to Mr. Howells: "You see I take a vile,

mercenary view of things--but then my household expenses are something

almost ghastly": he estimated that in the year 1881 he had spent

considerably more than $100,000. "It was with the increased scale of

living," says Mr. Paine, "that Clemens had become especially eager for

some source of commercial profit; something that would yield a return,

not in paltry thousands, but hundreds of thousands. Like Colonel

Sellers, he must have something with 'millions in it.'" This was the

visible sign that his mode of living had now become permanently

extravagant. In 1906, long after his wife had died and when he was

living much of the time virtually alone, his household expenses

amounted, according to Mr. Paine, "to more than fifty dollars a day. In

the matter of food, the choicest and most expensive the market could

furnish was always served in lavish abundance. He had the best and

highest-priced servants, ample as to number." Certainly his natural

taste, which was always, we are told, for a simple, inexpensive style,

would never have set that scale: it was a habit he had formed in those

early efforts to qualify as an admired citizen. And so was his

"disposition towards an expansive, all-round life," a disposition that

finally made all concentration impossible to him. "In his large

hospitality, and in a certain boyish love of grandeur," says Mr. Paine,

"he gloried in the splendor of his entertainment, the admiration and

delight of his guests. There were _always_ guests; they were coming and

going constantly. Clemens used to say that he proposed to establish a

'bus line between their house and the station for the accommodation of

his company.... For the better portion of the year he was willing to pay

the price of it, whether in money or in endurance"--after a while he

virtually gave up all thought of writing except during the summer

months: "I cannot write a book at home," he frankly told his

mother--"and Mrs. Clemens heroically did her part. She loved these

things also, in her own way. She took pride in them, and realized that

they were a part of his vast success. Yet in her heart she often longed

for the simpler life--above all, for the farm life at Elmira. Her spirit

cried out for the rest and comfort there." Could anything be more

ironical? It was to satisfy her that he had repressed in himself the

child of light in order to become the child of this world, and now she

found herself actually drowning in the flood of that deflected energy!

To shine, meanwhile, to make money, to rival and outrival those whom the

public most admired had become Mark Twain's ruling passion. With the

beginning of his life in Buffalo he was already "a man of large

consequence and events," and I have suggested that in the process of

adapting himself all the latent instincts of his heritage had risen up

in him. Take, for instance, that mechanical ingenuity which is one of

the outstanding traits of the pioneer mind: it would certainly have

remained in abeyance if Mark Twain had followed his natural tendency and

become absorbed in literature. Now, however, with his ever-increasing

need of money, it came to the fore and was by way of turning him into a

professional inventor. At any rate, he invented, among other things, a

waistcoat enabling the wearer to dispense with suspenders, a shirt

requiring no studs, a perpetual calendar watch-charm, a method of

casting brass dies for stamping book-covers and wall-paper and a

postal-check to supplant the money-order in common use--not to mention

the "Mark Twain Scrap-Book" which he did not hesitate, so confused were

his artistic and his commercial motives, to promote under his own name.

He had, moreover, an unfailing interest in the mechanical devices of

other people. When he installed a telharmonium in his house at Redding

he made a little speech telling his friends that he had been the first

author in the world to use a type-writer for manuscript work--his

impression was that "Tom Sawyer" was the first book to be copied in

this way, but Mr. Paine thinks it was "Life on the Mississippi"--that he

had been one of the earliest users of the fountain-pen, and that his had

been the first telephone ever used in a private house. To this we can

add that he was one of the first to use the phonograph for dictation and

one of the first purchasers also of the high-wheeled bicycle. We can see

one reason for this eager interest in mechanical inventions in the fact

that out of it grew many of those adventures in financial speculation to

which also, in true pioneer fashion, Mark Twain was drawn like steel to

the magnet. He invested, and usually lost, large sums of money in the

following patents: a steam generator, a steam pulley, a new method of

marine telegraphy, a new engraving process, a new cash-register, a

spiral hatpin. His losses in almost every one of these enterprises

amounted to between twenty-five and thirty thousand dollars, and this is

not to mention the Paige Typesetting Machine, which cost him nearly two

hundred thousand dollars and whole years out of his life. He complained

of the anxiety these ventures caused him, of the frantic efforts he had

to make in order to collect the money to invest in them. But he had no

choice now. He had to make money to keep the mill going at home and he

had to make money in order to make money; besides, he was the victim of

his own past, of the gambling habits of the gold-fields. Within one

month after the happy conclusion of those agonizing years of struggle to

redress his bankruptcy, he was negotiating with an Austrian inventor for

a machine that was to be used to control the carpet-weaving industries

of the world, planning a company to be capitalized at fifteen hundred

million dollars.

Can we not see what an immense creative force must have been displaced

in order to give passage to this "desire," as Mr. Paine calls it, "to

heap up vast and sudden sums, to revel in torrential golden showers"?

Mark Twain "boiled over," we are told, with projects for the

distribution of General Grant's book: "his thoughts were far too busy

with plans for furthering the sale of the great military memoir to

follow literary ventures of his own." He had taken over the book

because, as "the most conspicuous publisher in the world"--for this he

had, in fact, become--he had an immense plant going, yawning, one might

say, for the biggest available mouthful. His profit from this particular

enterprise was $150,000; "Huckleberry Finn" brought him, at about the

same time, $50,000 more: "I am frightened," he wrote, "at the

proportions of my prosperity. It seems to me that whatever I touch turns

to gold." His blood was up now, however; he was insatiable; how could he

who, as a miner, had known what it was to be a "millionaire for ten

days," and who had become the servant of no conscious creative

principle, resist the propulsion of a demoralized money-sense? There, at

least, that balked energy of his might express itself freely,

gorgeously, to the applause of all America. We see him planning to make

millions from a certain game of English kings; proposing a grand tour of

authors--he and Howells, Aldrich and Cable, are to swing about the

country in a private car, with himself as impresario and paymaster,

"reaping a golden harvest"; calculating that the American business alone

of the Paige Typesetting Machine is going to yield thirty-five millions

a year. What if he and his family are, almost literally, killing

themselves with anxiety over that infernal invention, which cost them

three thousand dollars a month for three years and seven months? What if

his life is broken by feverish business trips across the ocean, by swift

and deadly forays against the publishing pirates of Canada? What if he

is in a state of chronic agitation and irritation, "excited, worried,

impatient, rash, frenzied, and altogether upset"? He is living against

the grain; no matter, he is living the true American life, living it

with a mad fervor. He cannot even publish a book in the ordinary way, he

has to make a fortune out of every one: "a book in the trade," he says,

"is a book thrown away, as far as money-profit goes.... Any other means

of bringing out a book [than subscription] is privately printing it." He

"liked the game of business," Mr. Paine says, "especially when it was

pretentious and showily prosperous." Yes, there Tom Sawyer might swagger

to his heart's content and have all the multitude, and the enemies of

his own household, with him. "Here I am," he exclaims, in the vision of

the fortune that "poet in steel," Paige, is going to bring him--"here I

am one of the wealthiest grandees in America, one of the Vanderbilt

gang, in fact." Could Elmira have asked more of him than that?

For Mark Twain was not simply living the bourgeois life now; he had

adopted all the values and ideals of the bourgeoisie. Success, prestige,

position, wealth had become his gods and the tribal customs of a nation

of traders identical in his mind with the laws of the universe.

He was, after all, a literary man; yet as a publisher he was more

oblivious to the advancement of literature than the ordinary man of the

trade. His policy was the pursuit of "big" names, and that alone. What

were the works issued or projected under his direction by the firm of

Charles L. Webster and Co.? The memoirs of General Grant, General

Sheridan, General McClellan, General Hancock and Henry Ward Beecher, the

"Life of Pope Leo XIII," and a book by the King of the Sandwich Islands.

It was not even greatness outside of literature that he sought for, it

was mere notoriety: one would say that in his lifelong passion for

getting his name and fame associated with those of other men who were

secure of the suffrages of the multitude Mark Twain was almost

consciously bidding for approval and corroboration. He had that slavish

weakness of all commercialized men: he worshiped, regardless of his own

shadowy convictions, any one who was able to "put it over." We know what

he thought of Cecil Rhodes, yet "I admire him," he said, "I frankly

confess it, and when his time comes, I shall buy a piece of the rope for

a keepsake." As for Mrs. Eddy, he finds her "grasping, sordid,

penurious, famishing for everything she sees--money, power, glory--vain,

untruthful, jealous, despotic, arrogant, insolent, illiterate, shallow,

immeasurably selfish" ... yet still ... "in several ways the most

interesting woman that ever lived, and the most extraordinary. It is

quite within the probabilities," he goes on, regarding the founder of

Christian Science, "that a century hence she will be the most imposing

figure that has cast its shadow across the globe since the inauguration

of our era." Why, pray? Because of her genius for organization, because

of her success in "putting over" what he freely calls, in spite of his

faith in its methods, the greatest hoax in history. And why did he

admire modern Germany and despise modern France? The Frenchman, he said,

is "the most ridiculous creature in the world"; his "only race

prejudice" was against the French. In this, and in his blind worship of

imperial Germany, he reflected the view which the majority of American

business men have conveniently forgotten of late years that they ever

held. It was not the old Germany that he admired--never that! It was

Wilhelm's Germany, Bismarck's Germany. He who, in the "Connecticut

Yankee," had set out to make mediæval England a "going concern" could

hardly do other than adore the most splendid example of just that

phenomenon in all history.

Mark Twain had, in fact, taken on the whole character and point of view

of the American magnate. How enormously preoccupied his later European

letters are, for instance, with hotels, cabs, couriers, all the

appurtenances of your true Western packing-house prince on tour! We are

told that once, by some tragic error, he installed himself and his

family in a quarter of Berlin which was "eminently not the place for a

distinguished man of letters," and that he hastened to move to one of

the best addresses in the city, of which "there was no need to be

ashamed." He had become, we see, something of a snob: a fact illustrated

by a sorry episode in Mr. Paine's biography which he remembered with a

feeling of guilt and mortification. He had engaged a poor divinity

student to go abroad with him and his family as an amanuensis and he

told how that young man had met them, in his bedraggled raiment, on the

deck of the ship, just as they were about to sail: "He came straight to

us, and shook hands and compromised us. Everybody could see that we knew

him." What supremely mattered to Mark Twain now was the pomp and

circumstance of his own prestige: so touchy had he become that we find

him employing an agent in England to look up the sources of a purely

imaginary campaign of abuse he thought a certain New York newspaper was

carrying on against him. He wrote, but did not mail, "blasting" letters

to his assailants and those who crossed or criticized him; he indulged

in ferocious dreams of libel suits, this man who had staked everything

on his reputation! Was it not his glory that he was "beset by all the

cranks and beggars in Christendom"? His pride was not in his work, it

was in his power and his fame.

Thus it came to pass, in these middle years of his life, that while in

the old world virtually every writer of eminence was inalterably set

against the life-destroying tendencies of capitalistic industrialism,

Mark Twain found himself the spokesman of the Philistine majority, the

headlong enthusiast for what he called "the plainest and sturdiest and

infinitely greatest and worthiest of all the centuries the world has

seen." The second half of "Life on the Mississippi" glows with

complacent satisfaction over the march of what he was pleased to accept

as progress, the purely quantitative progress of an expanding

materialism; it bristles with statistics, it resembles, in fact, nothing

so much as the annual commercial supplement of a Western newspaper. In

1875, when he was on one of his many pinnacles of prosperity, he wrote a

Utopia, "The Curious Republic of Gondour." And what was the sort of

improvement he showed there that he desired for the world? He suggested

that "for every fifty thousand 'sacos' a man added to his property he

was entitled to another vote." The fable was published anonymously: the

great democratic humorist could hardly father in public the views of the

framers of the American Constitution. But we can see from this how far

Mark Twain, like the chameleon which he said man was, had taken the

colors of the privileged class which the new industrial régime had

brought forth and of which his own material success had made him a

member.

His essential instinct, as we know, was antagonistic to all this; his

essential instinct, the instinct of the artist, placed him naturally in

the opposition with all the great European writers of his age. Turn to

his letters and see what he says in the privacy of his correspondence

and memoranda. He is strongly against the tariff; he vehemently defends

the principle of the strike and woman suffrage; he is consistently for

the union of labor as against the union of capital; he bitterly regrets

the formation of the Trusts; "a ruling public and political aristocracy

which could create a presidential succession" is, he says, neither more

nor less than monarchism. He deals one blow after another against the

tendencies of American imperialism, against the Balance of Power,

against the Great Power system. And hear what he writes in 1887: "When I

finished Carlyle's 'French Revolution' in 1871, I was a Girondin; every

time I have read it since I have read it differently ... and now I lay

the book down once more, and recognize that I am a Sansculotte!--and not

a pale, characterless Sansculotte, but a Marat." All this in the privacy

of his correspondence! In public, he could not question, he did not wish

to question, the popular drift of his age, the popular cry of his age,

"Nothing succeeds like success"! Shall I be told that he created quite a

scandal in Hartford by deserting the Republican party and becoming a

Mugwump? At least he was in very respectable company. In his impetuous

defence of "the drive and push and rush and struggle of the living,

tearing, booming, nineteenth, the mightiest of all the centuries," he

was incessantly fighting his own instincts: we find him, in one

situation after another, defending on the most factitious grounds, for

trumped up reasons which he had to give his conscience but which he

would have laughed at if any one else had used them, vindicating,

frantically vindicating, causes which he loathed in his Heart but which

he was constrained to consider just. Is it the Boer war? It is abhorrent

to him, and yet he insists that England's hand must be upheld. He rages

in secret for the weaker; in public, an infallible monitor keeps him on

the winning side. All that year, we note, "Clemens had been tossing on

the London social tide"; he had to mind his Ps and Qs in London

drawing-rooms. And consider his remarks on the annexation of the

Sandwich Islands. We can give them, he says, "leather-headed juries, the

insanity law, and the Tweed ring.... We can make that little bunch of

sleepy islands the hottest corner on earth, and array it in the moral

splendor of our high and holy civilization.... 'Shall we, to men

benighted, the lamp of life deny'?" Do you imagine that he is overtly

opposed to the annexation? No, we have Mr. Paine's word for it that this

was Mark Twain's peculiar fashion of urging the step. At this very time

he was coining money out of his lectures on Hawaii: he could hardly have

afforded to take the unpopular view that found expression in his

letters. In Berlin our fanatical anti-monarchist compresses his angry

views about rebellion against kings into a few secret lines hastily

written in his hotel bed-room; then, having been cleverly invited to

dine at the Kaiser's right hand, he proceeds to tell the world in a loud

voice how incomparable the German Empire is. He was keeping a court of

his own, in Berlin, in Vienna, with generals and ambassadors dancing

attendance on him!--how could he have spoken out? Yet it was not

hypocrisy, this perpetual double-dealing, though we should certainly

have thought it so if psychology had not made us familiar with the

principle of the "water-tight compartment": Mark Twain was the chronic

victim of a mode of life that placed him bodily and morally in one

situation after another where, in order to survive, he had to violate

the law of his own spirit. To him, in short, all success was a fatality;

and just in the degree that his repressed self raged against it, his

dominant self became its hierophant, its fugleman. He who wrote an

article passionately advocating that the salaries of American

ambassadors should be quadrupled and that an official costume should be

devised for them showed how utterly he failed of any sense of the true

function of the man of letters; he had become, quite without realizing

it, the mouthpiece of the worldly interests of a primitive commercial

society with no ideal save that of material prestige and aggrandizement.

As we have seen, personal and private loyalties had come to take

precedence in Mark Twain's mind over all other loyalties; no ideal, with

him, no purpose, no belief, was to be weighed for a moment if the

pursuit of it, or the promulgation of it, was likely to hurt the

feelings of a friend. Quite early in his career he planned a book on

England and collected volumes of notes for it only to give over the

scheme because he was afraid his criticism or his humor would "offend

those who had taken him into their hearts and homes." Imagine Emerson

having been prevented by any such consideration from writing "English

Traits"! I have pointed out how utterly Mark Twain had failed to rise to

the conception of literature as a great impersonal social instrument,

how immersed he was in the petty, provincial values of a semi-rustic

bourgeoisie among whom the slightest expression of individuality was

regarded as an attack on somebody's feelings or somebody's pocket-book.

As time had gone on, therefore, and his circle of friends had come to

include most of the main pillars of American society, it had become less

and less possible for the tongue-tied artist in him to assert itself

against the complacent pioneer. We know what his instinctive religious

tendency was; yet he had a fatal way of entangling his loyalties with

very dogmatic ministers of the gospel. We know what his instinctive

economic and political tendencies were; yet the further he advanced in

his business activities, and the more he failed in them, the more deeply

he involved himself with all the old freebooters of capitalism. How,

then, could he have developed and expressed any of these tendencies in

his writings? He whose "closest personal friend and counselor for more

than forty years," as Mr. Paine says, was the pastor of what he had

once, in a moment of illumination, called the "Church of the Holy

Speculators" in Hartford; who, from the depths of his gratitude, was to

say of H.H. Rogers, when the latter rescued him in his bankruptcy, "I

never had a friend before who put out a hand and tried to pull me ashore

when he found me in deep water"--this man had given too many hostages to

the established order ever seriously to attack that order. His dominant

self had no desire to attack it; his dominant self was part and parcel

of it. Some one offered him as a publisher a book arraigning the

Standard Oil Co. "I wanted to say," he wrote, "the only man I care for

in the world, the only man I would give a d---- for, the only man who is

lavishing his sweat and blood to save me and mine from starvation is a

Standard Oil magnate. If you know me, you know whether I want the book

or not." His obligations had gradually come to be innumerable. We find

him urging Mr. Rogers to interest the Rockefellers "and the other

Standard Oil chiefs" in Helen Keller, trying to inveigle Carnegie into

his moribund publishing business as a partner, accepting from "Saint

Andrew's" "Triumphant Democracy" the suggestion for his own "Connecticut

Yankee" and from Saint Andrew himself a constant supply of Scotch

whiskey, begging his "affectionate old friend Uncle Joe" Cannon to

accomplish for him a certain piece of copyright legislation. How was

Mark Twain to set himself up as a heretic, he who had involved himself

over head and ears in the whole complex of popular commercial life, he

who was himself one of the big fish in the golden torrent? Only once, in

a little book published after his death, "Mark Twain and the Happy

Island," does one find his buried self showing its claws. It is there

recorded that Mr. Rockefeller, Jr., having asked him to speak before his

Sunday School class, Mark Twain suggested as his topic an exposition of

Joseph's Egyptian policy. The invitation was not repeated.

So we see Mark Twain, this playboy, the pioneer in letters, the strayed

reveller, the leader of the herd, giving and taking with a hearty

liberality, all inside the folk-feeling of his time, holding the

American nation in the hollow of his hand--the nation, or rather the

epoch, whose motto he had coined in the phrase, "Tell the truth or

trump--but get the trick." Never was a writer more perfectly at home

with his public--he does not hesitate, in his speeches and asides, to

pour out the most intimate details of his domestic life, knowing as he

does that all America, all prosperous America, is just one good-humored

family party. When he fails in business, cheques pour in upon him from

every corner of the country: "It was known," says Mr. Paine, "that Mark

Twain had set out for the purpose of paying his debts, and no cause

would make a deeper appeal to his countrymen than that, or, for that

matter, to the world at large." At Hartford, we are told, the whole

neighborhood was "like one great family with a community of interests, a

unity of ideals," and gradually that circle, "Holy Speculators" and all,

had widened until Mark Twain had become everybody's neighbor.

Have I noted enough of his traits to show that in his dominant character

he had become the archtypical pioneer? Let me note them once more: an

uncritical and uncalculating temper, a large, loose desire for an

expansive and expensive all-round life, a habit of accepting from his

surroundings "the prevailing ideas and modes of action," a naïve worship

of success and prestige, an eager and inveterate interest in mechanical

inventions and commercial speculation, an instinctive habit of

subjugating all loyalties to personal and domestic loyalties. To this

let us add, finally, the versatile career of the jack-of-all-trades. "I

have been through the California mill," he said, "with all its 'dips,

spurs and angles, variations and sinuosities.' I have worked there at

all the different trades and professions known to the catalogues." And

once, as if to show that he had qualified for the popular rôle and had

forestalled what Mr. Croly calls the distrust and aversion of the

pioneer democracy for the man with a special vocation and high standards

of achievement, he drew up a list of his occupations and found that he

had been a printer, a pilot, a soldier, a miner in several kinds, a

reporter, a lecturer and a publisher; also "an author for twenty years

and an ass for fifty-five."

It is only with all this in mind that we can grasp Mark Twain's

instinctive conception of the literary career. He never thought of

literature as an art, as the study and occupation of a lifetime: it was

merely the line of activity which he followed more consistently than any

other. Primarily, he was the business man, exploiting his imagination

for commercial profit, his objects being precisely those of any other

business man--to provide for his family, to gain prestige, to make

money because other people made money and to make more money than other

people made. We remember how, in 1868, he had written to his brother

Orion: "I am in for it now. I must go on chasing [phantoms] until I

marry, _then_ I am done with literature and all other bosh--that is,

literature wherewith to please the general public. I shall write to

please myself then." Similarly, in 1899, almost at the other end of the

span of his active life, he wrote to Mr. Howells: "For several years I

have been intending to stop writing for print as soon as I could afford

it. At last I can afford it, and have put the pot-boiler pen away."

Those two utterances show us clearly that the artist in him was

sufficiently awake at the beginning and at the end of his career to

realize, in the one case, that he was not living the creative life, and

in the other that he had not lived it--for certainly his marriage had

not relieved him from the necessity of pleasing the general public!

Between whiles, the creative instinct of the artist had been so

supplanted by the acquisitive instinct of the pioneer that he had no

conscious sense of control over his life at all: he was not the artist,

he was the journalist, the capitalist equally in the fields of business

enterprise and of letters.

"If Sam had got that pocket"--we remember the saying of his old

California comrade--"he would have remained a pocket-miner to the end of

his days." If, indeed, literature had not become for him the equivalent

of a gold mine, the only gold mine available on many occasions, would he

have continued to write as he did? We know that whenever, as sometimes

happened, the repressed spirit of the artist in him raised its head and

perceived, if we may say so, the full extent of its _débâcle_, Mark

Twain was filled with a despondent desire, a momentary purpose even, to

stop writing altogether. "Mama and I," wrote his little daughter Susy,

"have both been very much troubled of late because papa, since he had

been publishing General Grant's books, has seemed to forget his own

books and works entirely; and the other evening, as papa and I were

promenading up and down the library, he told me that he didn't expect to

write but one more book, and then he was ready to give up work

altogether, die, or do anything." Certainly he would never have so

neglected, abandoned, his own writing to further the literary fortunes

of General Grant, a task that almost any one might have done quite as

well, if in his own writing he had been experiencing the normal flow of

the creative life: he had thrown himself so eagerly into the publishing

business precisely because his creative instinct had been thwarted. We

have just seen what he said to Mr. Howells: "For several years I have

been intending to stop writing for print as soon as I could afford it":

of the "Connecticut Yankee" he writes elsewhere: "It's my swan-song, my

retirement from literature permanently." He always found a certain

pleasure in writing even when he was writing at his worst, and yet we

can see that the artist in him would gladly have put a stop to this

ironical career, if it had not had another aspect, a more practical

aspect, that appealed to his dominant self. "From the very beginning

Mark Twain's home always meant more to him than his work": which is

simply another way of saying that that gregarious pioneer, that comrade

and emulator of politicians and magnates who was Mrs. Clemens's husband,

found ample reason to continue his literary life for the sake of the

material rewards it brought him.

How completely, in a word, Mark Twain had adopted the prevailing point

of view of the industrial epoch! How completely, in him, during those

middle years, the poet was submerged in the pioneer! Much as he praised

men of letters like Howells, his real admiration and respect went out to

the "strong, silent men" of money like H.H. Rogers. One recalls the

hesitation with which he, "the Lincoln of our literature," as Mr.

Howells calls him, presumed to offer compliments to General Grant on the

literary quality of his Memoirs: "I was as much surprised as Columbus's

cook could have been to learn that Columbus wanted his opinion as to how

Columbus was doing his navigating." There is decidedly more than a

personal humility in that, there is all the pioneer's contempt for the

word as against the deed, an ingrained contempt for the creative life as

against the life of sagacious action. And this was deeply characteristic

of Mark Twain. He was always for the Bacons as opposed to the

Shakespeares; in his private memoranda he does not conceal a certain

disdain for Jesus Christ in comparison with Marcus Aurelius and the

Stoics, and the indignant passion of his defense of Harriet Shelley, to

mention an allied instance, is hardly qualified by any regard for her

husband. Finally, writer as he was, his enthusiasm for literature was as

nothing beside his enthusiasm for machinery: he had fully accepted the

illusion of his contemporaries that the progress of machinery was

identical with the progress of humanity. Hear what he writes to his

brother on one of the several occasions when the Paige Typesetting

Machine seemed to be finished: "Dear Orion--At 12:20 this afternoon a

line of movable types was spaced and justified by machinery, for the

first time in the history of the world: and I was there to see. It was

done _automatically_--instantly--perfectly. This is indeed the first

line of movable types that ever _was_ perfectly spaced and perfectly

justified on this earth. All the witnesses made written record of the

immense historical birth ... and also set down the hour and the minute.

Nobody had drank anything, and yet everybody seemed drunk. Well--dizzy,

stupefied, stunned.... All the other wonderful inventions of the human

brain sink pretty nearly into commonplaces contrasted with this awful

mechanical miracle." It is one ex-printer writing to another: how

wonderful that machine must have seemed to a man whose hands remembered

the grubby labor of the old village type-case! But then, Mark Twain was

fifty-four years old at this time and those memories were very far away,

too far away--as even his financial interest was too shallow, after

all--to account for this emotion, before one of the innumerable

mechanical miracles of the nineteenth century, of respect, of reverence,

of awe-struck wonder. How far, we ask ourselves, how far had not Mark

Twain become, in order to experience that emotion in the presence of a

piece of machinery, something no longer himself but the embodiment of

the whole industrial epoch? It is enough to note how capable he was of

the elevations of religion, and what it was that caused those elevations

in him. It was not literature. Paige, the inventor of this machine, he

called "a poet, a most great and genuine poet, whose sublime creations

are written in steel": which leaves little to be said about the poets

who write in mere words. And, in fact, on the occasion of Walt Whitman's

seventieth birthday, Mark Twain expressed, in a way, his opinion of such

people. He congratulated the poet for having lived in an age that had

witnessed, among other benefactions, "the amazing, infinitely varied and

innumerable products of coal-tar"; he neglected to congratulate the age

for having produced Walt Whitman.

The Ordeal of Mark Twain · 第 6 / 11 章