'Be this at least his praise, be this his pride,

To force applause no modern arts are tried:

Should partial catcalls all his hopes confound,

He bids no trumpet quell the fatal sound;

Should welcome sleep relieve the weary wit,

He rolls no thunders o'er the drowsy pit;

No snares to captivate the judgement spreads,

Nor bribes your eyes to prejudice your heads.

Unmov'd, though witlings sneer and rivals rail,

Studious to please, yet not asham'd to fail,

He scorns the meek address, the suppliant strain,

With merit needless, and without it vain;

In Reason, Nature, Truth, he dares to trust;

Ye fops be silent, and ye wits be just!'

BOSWELL.

[579] Johnson said of Mrs. Pritchard's playing in general that 'it was

quite mechanical;' _post_, April 7, 1775. See also _post_ under

Sept. 30, 1783.

[580] 'The strangling of Irene in the view of the audience was suggested

by Mr. Garrick.' Davies's _Garrick_, i. 128. Dryden in his _Essay of

Dramatick Poesie_ (edit. 1701, i. 13), says:--'I have observed that in

all our tragedies the audience cannot forbear laughing when the actors

are to die; 'tis the most comick part of the whole play.' 'Suppose your

Piece admitted, acted; one single ill-natured jest from the pit is

sufficient to cancel all your labours.' Goldsmith's _Present State of

Polite Learning_, chap. x.

[581] In her last speech two of the seven lines are very bad:--

'Guilt and despair, pale spectres! grin around me,

And stun me with the yellings of damnation!'

Act v. sc. 9.

[582] Murphy referring to Boswell's statement says:--'The Epilogue, we

are told in a late publication, was written by Sir William Young. This

is a new discovery, but by no means probable. When the appendages to a

Dramatic Performance are not assigned to a friend, or an unknown hand,

or a person of fashion, they are always supposed to be written by the

author of the Play.' Murphy's _Johnson_, p. 154. He overlooks altogether

the statement in the _Gent. Mag_. (xix. 85) that the Epilogue is 'by

another hand.' Mr. Croker points out that the words 'as Johnson informed

me' first appear in the second edition. The wonder is that Johnson

accepted this Epilogue, which is a little coarse and a little profane.

Yonge was Secretary at War in Walpole's ministry. Walpole said of him

'that nothing but Yonge's character could keep down his parts, and

nothing but his parts support his character.' Horace Walpole's

_Letters_, i. 98, note.

[583] I know not what Sir John Hawkins means by the _cold reception_ of

_Irene_. (See note, p. 192.) I was at the first representation, and most

of the subsequent. It was much applauded the first night, particularly

the speech on _to-morrow_ [Act iii. sc. 2]. It ran nine nights at least.

It did not indeed become a stock-play, but there was not the least

opposition during the representation, except the first night in the last

act, where Irene was to be strangled on the stage, which _John_ could

not bear, though a dramatick poet may stab or slay by hundreds. The

bow-string was not a Christian nor an ancient Greek or Roman death. But

this offence was removed after the first night, and Irene went off the

stage to be strangled.--BURNEY.

[584] According to the _Gent. Mag_. (xix. 76) 'it was acted from Monday,

Feb. 6, to Monday, Feb. 20, inclusive.' A letter in the _Garrick

Corres_, (i. 32), dated April 3, 1745, seems to shew that so long a run

was uncommon. The writer addressing Garrick says:--'You have now

performed it [_Tancred_] for nine nights; consider the part, and whether

nature can well support the frequent repetition of such shocks. Permit

me to advise you to resolve not to act upon any account above three

times a week.' Yet against this may be set the following passage in the

_Rambler_, No. l23:--'At last a malignant author, whose performance I

had persecuted through the nine nights, wrote an epigram upon Tape the

critic, which drove me from the pit for ever.' Murphy writing in 1792

said that _Irene_ had not been exhbited on any stage since its first

representation. Murphy's _Johnson_, p. 52.

[585] Mr. Croker says that 'it appears by a MS. note in Isaac Reed's

copy of Murphy's Life, that the receipts of the third, sixth, and ninth

nights, after deducting sixty guineas a night for the expenses of the

house, amounted to £195 17s.: Johnson cleared therefore, with the

copyright, very nearly £300.' _Irene_ was sold at the price of 1s. 6d. a

copy (_Gent. Mag_. xix. 96); so that Dodsley must have looked for a very

large sale.

[586] See _post_, 1780, in Mr. Langton's _Collection_ for Johnson's

estimate of _Irene_ in later life.

[587] Aaron Hill (vol. ii. p. 355), in a letter to Mr. Mallett, gives

the following account of _Irene_ after having seen it: 'I was at the

anomalous Mr. Johnson's benefit, and found the play his proper

representative; strong sense ungraced by sweetness or decorum.' BOSWELL.

[588] See _ante_, p. 102

[589] Murphy (_Life_, p. 53) says that some years afterwards, when he

knew Johnson to be in distress, he asked Garrick why he did not produce

another tragedy for his Lichfield friend? Garrick's answer was

remarkable: "When Johnson writes tragedy, declamation roars, and passion

sleeps: when Shakespeare wrote; he dipped his pen in his own heart."

Johnson was perhaps aware of the causes of his failure as a

tragedy-writer. In his criticism of Addison's _Cato_ he says: 'Of _Cato_

it has been not unjustly determined that it is rather a poem in dialogue

than a drama, rather a succession of just sentiments in elegant language

than a representation of natural affections, or any state probable or

possible in human life ... The events are expected without solicitude,

and are remembered without joy or sorrow.... Its success has introduced

or confirmed among us the use of dialogue too declamatory, of

unaffecting elegance and chill philosophy.' _Works_, vii. 456. 'Johnson

thought: _Cato_ the best model of tragedy we had; yet he used to say, of

all things the most ridiculous would be to see a girl cry at the

representation of it.' Johnson's _Works_ (1787), xi. 207. _Cato_, if

neglected, has added at least eight 'habitual quotations' to the

language (see Thackeray's _English Humourists_, p. 98). _Irene_ has

perhaps not added a single one. It has neverthingless some quotable

lines, such as--

'Crowds that hide a monarch from

himself.' Act i. sc. 4.

'To cant ... of reason to a lover.'

Act iii. sc. 1.

'When e'en as love was breaking

off from wonder,

And tender accents quiver'd on my

lips.' Ib.

'And fate lies crowded in a narrow

space.' Act iii. sc. 6.

'Reflect that life and death, affecting

sounds,

Are only varied modes of endless

being.' Act ii. sc. 8.

'Directs the planets with a careless

nod.' Ib.

'Far as futurity's untravell'd waste.'

Act iv. sc. 1.

'And wake from ignorance the

western world.' Act iv. sc. 2.

'Through hissing ages a proverbial

coward,

The tale of women, and the scorn

of fools.' Act iv. sc. 3.

'No records but the records of the

sky.' Ib.

'... thou art sunk beneath reproach.'

Act v. sc. 2.

'Oh hide me from myself.'

Act v. sc. 3.

[590] Johnson wrote of Milton:--'I cannot but conceive him calm and

confident, little disappointed, not at all dejected, relying on his own

merit with steady consciousness, and waiting without impatience the

vicissitudes of opinion, and the impartiality of a future generation.'

Johnson's _Works_, vii. 108.

[591]

'Genus irritabile vatum.'

'The fretful tribe of rival poets.'

Francis, _Horace_, Ep. ii. 2. 102.

[592] This deference he enforces in many passages in his writings; as

for instance:--'Dryden might have observed, that what is good only

because it pleases, cannot be pronounced good till it has been found to

please.' Johnson's _Works_, vii. 252. 'The authority of Addison is

great; yet the voice of the people, when to please the people is the

purpose, deserves regard.' _Ib_. 376. 'About things on which the public

thinks long, it commonly attains to think right.' _Ib_. 456. 'These

apologies are always useless: "de gustibus non est disputandum;" men may

be convinced, but they cannot be pleased against their will.' _Ib_.

viii. 26. 'Of things that terminate in human life, the world is the

proper judge; to despise its sentence, if it were possible, is not just;

and if it were just, is not possible.' _Ib_. viii. 316. Lord

Chesterfield in writing to his son about his first appearance in the

world said, 'You will be tried and judged there, not as a boy, but as a

man; and from that moment _there is no appeal for character_.' Lord

Chesterfield's _Letters_, iii. 324. Addison in the _Guardian_, No. 98,

had said that 'men of the best sense are always diffident of their

private judgment, till it receives a sanction from the public. _Provoco

ad populum_, I appeal to the people, was the usual saying of a very

excellent dramatic poet, when he had any disputes with particular

persons about the justness and regularity of his productions.' See

_post_, March 23, 1783.

[593] 'Were I,' he said, 'to wear a laced or embroidered waistcoat, it

should be very rich. I had once a very rich laced waistcoat, which I

wore the first night of my tragedy.' Boswell's _Hebrides_, Oct.

27, 1773.

[594] 'Topham Beauclerc used to give a pleasant description of this

greenroom finery, as related by the author himself: 'But,' said Johnson,

with great gravity, 'I soon laid aside my gold-laced hat, lest it should

make me proud.' Murphy's _Johnson_, p. 52. In _The Idler_ (No. 62) we

have an account of a man who had longed to 'issue forth in all the

splendour of embroidery.' When his fine clothes were brought, 'I felt

myself obstructed,' he wrote, 'in the common intercourse of civility by

an uneasy consciousness of my new appearance; as I thought myself more

observed, I was more anxious about my mien and behaviour; and the mien

which if formed by care is commonly ridiculous.'

[595] See _ante_, p. 167.

[596] See _post_, 1780, in Mr. Langton's _Collection_.

[597] _The Tatler_ came to an end on Jan 2, 1710-1; the first series of

_The Spectator_ on Dec 6, 1712; and the second series of _The Spectator_

on December 20, 1714.

[598] 'Two new designs have appeared about the middle of this month

[March, 1750], one entitled, _The Tatler Revived; or The Christian

Philosopher and Politician_, half a sheet, price 2_d_. (stamped); the

other, _The Rambler_, three half sheets (un-stamped); price 2_d_.'

_Gent. Mag_. xx. 126.

[599] Pope's _Essay on Man_, ii. 10.

[600] See _post_, under Oct. 12, 1779.

[601] I have heard Dr. Warton mention, that he was at Mr. Robert

Dodsley's with the late Mr. Moore, and several of his friends,

considering what should be the name of the periodical paper which Moore

had undertaken. Garrick proposed _The Sallad_, which, by a curious

coincidence, was afterwards applied to himself by Goldsmith:

'Our Garrick's a sallad, for in him we see

Oil, vinegar, sugar, and saltness agree!'

[_Retaliation_, line II.]

At last, the company having separated, without any thing of which they

approved having been offered, Dodsley himself thought of _The

World_. BOSWELL.

[602] In the original MS. 'in this _my_ undertaking,' and below, 'the

salvation _both_ of myself and others.'

[603] Prayers and Meditations, p. 9. BOSWELL.

[604] In the original folio edition of the _Rambler_ the concluding

paper is dated Saturday, March 17. But Saturday was in fact March 14.

This circumstance is worth notice, for Mrs. Johnson died on the

17th. MALONE.

[605] _Journal of a Tour to the Hebrides_, 3d edit. p. 28. [Aug. 16,

1773]. BOSWELL.

[606] 'Gray had a notion not very peculiar, that he could not write but

at certain times, or at happy moments; a fantastic foppery, to which my

kindness for a man of learning and virtue wishes him to have been

superior.' Johnson's _Works_, viii. 482. See _post_, under April

15, 1758.

[607] Her correspondence with Richardson and Mrs. Carter was published

in 1807.

[608] The correspondence between her and Mrs. Carter was published in

1808.

[609] Dr. Birch says:--'The proprietor of the _Rambler_, Cave, told me

that copy was seldom sent to the press till late in the night before the

day of publication,' Croker's _Boswell_, p. 121, note. See _post_, April

12, 1776, and beginning of 1781.

Johnson carefully revised the _Ramblers_ for the collected edition. The

editor of the Oxford edition of Johnson's _Works_ states (ii. x), that

'the alterations exceeded six thousand.' The following passage from the

last number affords a good instance of this revision.

_First edition_.

'I have never complied with temporary curiosity, nor furnished my

readers with abilities to discuss the topic of the day; I have seldom

exemplified my assertions by living characters; from my papers therefore

no man could hope either censures of his enemies or praises of himself,

and they only could be expected to peruse them, whose passions left them

leisure for the contemplation of abstracted truth, and whom virtue could

please by her native dignity without the assistance of modish

ornaments.' _Gent. Mag_. xxii. 117.

_Revised edition_.

'I have never complied with temporary curiosity, nor enabled my readers

to discuss the topic of the day; I have rarely exemplified my assertions

by living characters; in my papers no man could look for censures of his

enemies, or praises of himself; and they only were expected to peruse

them, whose passions left them leisure for abstracted truth, and whom

virtue could please by its naked dignity.' Johnson's _Works_, iii. 462.

[610] 'Such relicks [Milton's early manuscripts] shew how excellence is

acquired; what we hope ever to do with ease, we must learn first to do

with diligence.' Johnson's _Works_, vii. 119.

[611] Of the first 52 _Ramblers_ 49 were wholly by Johnson; of the last

156, 154. He seems to say that in the first 49, 17 were written from

notes, and in the last 154 only 13.

[612] No. 46.

[613] Hawkins's _Life of Johnson_, p. 268 [p. 265]. BOSWELL.

[614] 'The sly shadow steals away upon the dial, and the quickest eye

can distinguish no more than that it is gone.' Glanville, quoted in

Johnson's _Dictionary_.

[615] This most beautiful image of the enchanting delusion of youthful

prospect has not been used in any of Johnson's essays. BOSWELL.

[616] From Horace (_Ars Poet_. 1. 175) he takes his motto for the

number:--

'Multa ferunt anni venientes commoda secum,

Multa recedentes adimunt.'

The blessings flowing in with life's full tide

Down with our ebb of life decreasing glide.'

FRANCIS.

[617] Lib. xii. 96 [95]. 'In Tuccam aemulum omnium suorum studiorum.'

MALONE.

[618] 'There never appear,' says Swift, 'more than five or six men of

genius in an age; but if they were united, the world could not stand

before them.' Johnson's _Works_, iv. 18.

[619] In the first edition this is printed [Greek: o philoi on philos];

in the second, [Greek: o philoi on philos]; in the 'Corrections' to the

second, we find 'for [Greek: o] read [Greek: oi];' in the third it is

printed as above. In three editions we have therefore five readings of

the first word. See _post_, April 15, 1778, where Johnson says:

'An old Greek said, "He that has friends has no friend,"' and April 24,

1779, where he says: 'Garrick had friends but no friend.'

[620]

'gravesque

Principum amicitias.'

'And fatal friendships of the guilty

great.'

FRANCIS, Horace, _Odes_, ii. 1. 4.

[621] 3 _Post_, under Jan. 1, 1753.

[622] Sir John Hawkins has selected from this little collection of

materials, what he calls the 'Rudiments of two of the papers of the

_Rambler_.' But he has not been able to read the manuscript distinctly.

Thus he writes, p. 266, 'Sailor's fate any mansion;' whereas the

original is 'Sailor's life my aversion.' He has also transcribed the

unappropriated hints on _Writers for bread_, in which he decyphers these

notable passages, one in Latin, _fatui non famæ_, instead of _fami non

famæ_; Johnson having in his mind what Thuanus says of the learned

German antiquary and linguist, Xylander, who, he tells us, lived in such

poverty, that he was supposed _fami non famæ scribere_; and another in

French, _Degente de fate [fatu] et affamé a'argent_, instead of _Dégouté

de fame_, (an old word for _renommée_) _et affamé d'argent_. The

manuscript being written in an exceedingly small hand, is indeed very

hard to read; but it would have been better to have left blanks than to

write nonsense. BOSWELL.

[623] When we know that of the 208 _Ramblers_ all but five were written

by Johnson, it is amusing to read a passage in one of Miss Talbot's

letters to Mrs. Carter, dated Oct. 20, 1750:--'Mr. Johnson would, I

fear, be mortified to hear that people know a paper of his own by the

sure mark of somewhat a little excessive, a little exaggerated in the

expression.' _Carter Corres_. i. 357.

[624] The _Ramblers_ certainly were little noticed at first. Smart, the

poet, first mentioned them to me as excellent papers, before I had heard

any one else speak of them. When I went into Norfolk, in the autumn of

1751, I found but one person, (the Rev. Mr. Squires, a man of learning,

and a general purchaser of new books,) who knew anything of them. Before

I left Norfolk in the year 1760, the _Ramblers_ were in high favour

among persons of learning and good taste. Others there were, devoid of

both, who said that the _hard words_ in the _Rambler_ were used by the

authour to render his _Dictionary_ indispensably necessary. BURNEY. We

have notices of the _Rambler_ in the _Carter Corres_:--'May 28, 1750.

The author ought to be cautioned not to use over many hard words. In

yesterday's paper (a very pretty one indeed) we had _equiponderant, and

another so hard I cannot remember it [adscititious], both in one

sentence.' 'Dec. 17, 1750:--Mr. Cave complains of him for not admitting

correspondents; this does mischief. In the main I think he is to be

applauded for it. But why then does he not write now and then on the

living manners of the times?' In writing on April 22, 1752, just after

the _Rambler_ had come to an end, Miss Talbot says:--'Indeed 'tis a sad

thing that such a paper should have met with discouragement from wise

and learned and good people too. Many are the disputes it has cost me,

and not once did I come off triumphant.' Mrs. Carter replied:--'Many a

battle have I too fought for him in the country, out with little

success.' Murphy says:--'of this excellent production the number sold on

each day did not amount to five hundred; of course the bookseller, who

paid the author four guineas a week, did not carry on a successful

trade.' Murphy's _Johnson_, p. 59.

[625] Richardson wrote to Cave on Aug. 9, 1750, after forty-one numbers

had appeared:--'I hope the world tastes them; for its own sake I hope

the world tastes them. The author I can only guess at. There is but one

man, I think, that could write them.' _Rich. Corres_, i. 165. Cave

replied:--'Mr. Johnson is the _Great Rambler_, being, as you observe,

the only man who can furnish two such papers in a week, besides his

other great business.' He mentioned the recommendation it received from

high quarters, and continued:--'Notwithstanding, whether the price of

two-pence, or the unfavourable season of their first publication hinders

the demand, no boast can be made of it.' Johnson had not wished his name

to be known. Cave says that 'Mr. Carrick and others, who knew the

author's powers and style from the first, unadvisedly asserting their

suspicions, overturned the scheme of secrecy.' _Ib_. pp. 168-170.

[626] Horace Walpole, while justifying George II. against 'bookish men

who have censured his neglect of literature,' says:--'In truth, I

believe King George would have preferred a guinea to a composition as

perfect as _Alexander's Feast.' Reign of George II_, iii. 304.

[627] 'Dr. Johnson said to an acquaintance of mine, "My other works are

wine and water; but my _Rambler_ is pure wine."' Rogers's _Table

Talk_, p. 10.

[628] See _post_, April 5, 1772; April 19, 1773; and April 9, 1778.

[629] It was executed in the printing-office of Sands, Murray, and

Cochran, with uncommon elegance, upon writing-paper, of a duodecimo

size, and with the greatest correctness; and Mr. Elphinston enriched it

with translations of the mottos. When completed, it made eight handsome

volumes. It is, unquestionably, the most accurate and beautiful edition

of this work; and there being but a small impression, it is now become

scarce, and sells at a very high price. BOSWELL.

[630] Mr. Thomas Ruddiman, the learned grammarian of Scotland, well

known for his various excellent works, and for his accurate editions of

several authours. He was also a man of a most worthy private character.

His zeal for the Royal House of Stuart did not render him less estimable

in Dr. Johnson's eye. BOSWELL.

[631] In the _Gent. Mag_. for Sept. 1750, and for Oct. 1752,

translations of many of the mottoes were given; but in each number there

are several of Elphinston's. Johnson seems to speak of only one.

[632] Writing to Miss Porter on July 12, 1749, he said:--'I was afraid

your letter had brought me ill news of my mother, whose death is one of

the few calamities on which I think with terror.' Crokers _Boswell_,

p. 62.

[633] Mr. Strahan was Elphinston's brother-in-law. _Post_, April 9,

1778.

[634] In the _Gent. Mag_. for January, 1752, in the list of books

published is:--'A correct and beautiful edition of the Rambler in 4

volumes, in 12mo. Price 12s.' The _Rambler_ was not concluded till the

following March. The remaining two volumes were published in July.

_Gent. Mag_. xxii. 338.

[635] According to Hawkins (_Life_, P. 269) each edition consisted of

1250 copies.

[636] No. 55 [59.]. BOSWELL.

[637] Miss Burney records in her Diary that one day at Streatham, while

she and Mrs. Thrale 'were reading this Rambler, Dr. Johnson came in. We

told him what we were about. "Ah, madam!" cried he, "Goldsmith was not

scrupulous; but he would have been a great man had he known the real

value of his own internal resources."' Mme. D'Arblay's _Diary_, i. 83.

See _post_, beginning of 1768.

[638] It is possible that Mrs. Hardcastle's drive in _She Stoops to

Conquer_ was suggested by the _Rambler_, No. 34. In it a young gentleman

describes a lady's terror on a coach journey. 'Our whole conversation

passed in dangers, and cares, and fears, and consolations, and stories

of ladies dragged in the mire, forced to spend all the night on a heath,

drowned in rivers, or burnt with lightning.... We had now a new scene of

terror, every man we saw was a robber, and we were ordered sometimes to

drive hard, lest a traveller whom we saw behind should overtake us; and

sometimes to stop, lest we should come up to him who was passing before

us. She alarmed many an honest man by begging him to spare her life as

he passed by the coach.'

[639] Dr. Johnson was gratified by seeing this selection, and wrote to

Mr. Kearsley, bookseller in Fleet-Street, the following note:--

'Mr. Johnson sends compliments to Mr. Kearsley, and begs the favour of

seeing him as soon as he can. Mr. Kearsley is desired to bring with him

the last edition of what he has honoured with the name of BEAUTIES. May

20, 1782.' BOSWELL. The correspondence, _post_, May 15, 1782, shews that

Johnson sent for this book, not because he was gratified, but because he

was accused, on the strength of one of the _Beauties_, of recommending

suicide. On that day, being in the country, he wrote: 'I never saw the

book but by casual inspection, and considered myself as utterly

disengaged from its consequences.' He adds:--'I hope some time in the

next week to have all rectified.' The letter of May 20 shews that on his

return to town he lost little time, if any, in sending for Kearsley.

[640] See _post_, April 12, 1781.

[641] Ecclesiastes vii. 4.

[642] In the original '_separated sooner_ than subdued.' Johnson acted

up to what he said. When he was close on his end, 'all who saw him

beheld and acknowledged the _invictum animum Catonis_ ... Talking of his

illness he said:--"I will be conquered; I will not capitulate."' See

_post_, Oct. 1784.

[643] In the _Spectator_, No. 568, Addison tells of a village in which

'there arose a current report that somebody had written a book against

the 'squire and the whole parish.' The book was _The Whole Duty of Man_.

Life of Johnson, Volume 1 1709-1765 · 第 43 / 59 段