CHAPTER XIX.

Vicissitudes in War and Diplomacy.

Signs of Maturity -- The Mission to Genoa -- Course of the

French Republic -- The "Terror" -- Thermidor -- Buonaparte a

Scapegoat -- His Prescience -- Adventures of His Brothers --

Napoleon's Defense of His French Patriotism -- Bloodshedding

for Amusement -- New Expedition Against Corsica --

Buonaparte's Advice for Its Conduct.

[Sidenote: 1794.]

Buonaparte's plan for combining operations against both Genoa and

Sardinia was at first hazy. In his earliest efforts to expand and

clarify it, he wrote a rambling document, still in existence, which

draws a contrast between the opposite policies to be adopted with

reference to Italy and Spain. In it he also calls attention to the

scarcity of officers suitable for concerted action in a great

enterprise, and a remark concerning the course to be pursued in this

particular case contains the germ of his whole military system.

"Combine your forces in a war, as in a siege, on one point. The breach

once made, equilibrium is destroyed, everything else is useless, and

the place is taken. Do not conceal, but concentrate, your attack." In

the matter of politics he sees Germany as the main prop of opposition

to democracy; Spain is to be dealt with on the defensive, Italy on the

offensive. But, contrary to what he actually did in the following

year, he advises against proceeding too far into Piedmont, lest the

adversary should gain the advantage of position. This paper

Robespierre the younger had in his pocket when he left for Paris,

summoned to aid his brother in difficulties which were now pressing

fast upon him.

Ricord was left behind to direct, at least nominally, the movements

both of the armies and of the embassy to Genoa. Buonaparte continued

to be the real power. Military operations having been suspended to

await the result of diplomacy, his instructions from Ricord were drawn

so as to be loose and merely formal. On July eleventh he started from

Nice, reaching his destination three days later. During the week of

his stay--for he left again on the twenty-first--the envoy made his

representations, and laid down his ultimatum that the republic of

Genoa should preserve absolute neutrality, neither permitting troops

to pass over its territories, nor lending aid in the construction of

military roads, as she was charged with doing secretly. His success in

overawing the oligarchy was complete, and a written promise of

compliance to these demands was made by the Doge. Buonaparte arrived

again in Nice on the twenty-eighth. We may imagine that as he traveled

the romantic road between the mountains and the sea, the rising

general and diplomat indulged in many rosy dreams, probably feeling

already on his shoulders the insignia of a commander-in-chief. But he

was returning to disgrace, if not to destruction. A week after his

arrival came the stupefying news that the hour-glass had once again

been reversed, that on the very day of his own exultant return to

Nice, Robespierre's head had fallen, that the Mountain was shattered,

and that the land was again staggering to gain its balance after

another political earthquake.

The shock had been awful, but it was directly traceable to the

accumulated disorders of Jacobin rule. A rude and vigorous but eerie

order of things had been inaugurated on November twenty-fourth, 1793,

by the so-called republic. There was first the new calendar, in which

the year I began on September twenty-second, 1792, the day on which

the republic had been proclaimed. In it were the twelve thirty-day

months, with their names of vintage, fog, and frost; of snow, rain,

and wind; of bud, flower, and meadow; of seed, heat, and harvest: the

whole terminated most unpoetically by the five or six supplementary

days named sansculot-tides,--sansculottes meaning without

knee-breeches, a garment confined to the upper classes; that is, with

long trousers like the common people,--and these days were so named

because they were to be a holiday for the long-trousered populace

which was to use the new reckoning. There was next the new, strange,

and unhallowed spectacle, seen in history for the first time, the

realization of a nightmare--a whole people finally turned into an

army, and at war with nearly all the world. The reforming Girondists

had created the situation, and the Jacobins, with grim humor, were

unflinchingly facing the logical consequences of such audacity. Carnot

had given the watchword of attack in mass and with superior numbers;

the times gave the frenzied courage of sentimental exaltation. Before

the end of 1793 the foreign enemies of France, though not conquered,

had been checked on the frontier; the outbreak of civil war in Vendée

had been temporarily suppressed; both Lyons and Toulon had been

retaken.

Robespierre, St. Just, Couthon, and Billaud-Varennes were theorists

after the manner of Rousseau. Their new gospel of social regeneration

embraced democracy, civic virtue, moral institutions, and public

festivals. These were their shibboleths and catch-words. Incidentally

they extolled paternalism in government, general conscription,

compulsory military service, and, on the very eve of the greatest

industrial revival known to history, a return to agricultural society!

The sanction of all this was not moral suasion: essential to the

system was Spartan simplicity and severity, compulsion was the means

to their utopia.[40] The Jacobins were nothing if not thorough; and

here was another new and awful thing--the "Terror"--which had broken

loose with its foul furies of party against party through all the

land. It seemed at last as if it were exhausting itself, though for a

time it had grown in intensity as it spread in extent. It had created

three factions in the Mountain. Early in 1794 there remained but a

little handful of avowed and still eager terrorists in the

Convention--Hébert and his friends. These were the atheists who had

abolished religion and the past, bowing down before the fetish which

they dubbed Reason. They were seized and put to death on March

twenty-fourth. There then remained the cliques of Danton and

Robespierre; the former claiming the name of moderates, and telling

men to be calm, the latter with no principle but devotion to a person

who claimed to be the regenerator of society. These hero-worshipers

were for a time victorious. Danton, like Hébert, was foully murdered,

and Robespierre remained alone, virtually dictator. But his theatrical

conduct in decreeing by law the existence of a Supreme Being and the

immortality of the soul, and in organizing tawdry festivals to supply

the place of worship, utterly embittered against him both atheists and

pious people. In disappointed rage at his failure, he laid aside the

characters of prophet and mild saint to give vent to his natural

wickedness and to become a devil.

[Footnote 40: In Buchez et Roux, Histoire Parlementaire,

XXXI, pp. 268-290, 415-427; XXXII, pp. 335-381 _et

seq._, and in OEuvres de St. Just, pp. 360-420, will be

found a few examples of their views in their own words.]

During the long days of June and July there raged again a carnival of

blood, known to history as the "Great Terror." In less than seven

weeks upward of twelve hundred victims were immolated. The unbridled

license of the guillotine broadened as it ran. First the aristocrats

had fallen, then royalty, then their sympathizers, then the hated

rich, then the merely well-to-do, and lastly anybody not cringing to

existing power. The reaction against Robespierre was one of universal

fear. Its inception was the work of Tallien, Fouché, Barras, Carrier,

Fréron, and the like, men of vile character, who knew that if

Robespierre could maintain his pose of the "Incorruptible" their doom

was sealed. In this sense Robespierre was what Napoleon called him at

St. Helena, "the scapegoat of the Revolution." The uprising of these

accomplices was, however, the opportunity long desired by the better

elements in Parisian society, and the two antipodal classes made

common cause. Dictator as Robespierre wished to be, he was formed of

other stuff, for when the reckoning came his brutal violence was

cowed. On July twenty-seventh (the ninth of Thermidor), the Convention

turned on him in rebellion, extreme radicals and moderate

conservatives combining for the effort. Terrible scenes were enacted.

The sections of Paris were divided, some for the Convention, some for

Robespierre. The artillerymen who were ordered by the latter to batter

down the part of the Tuileries where his enemies were sitting

hesitated and disobeyed; at once all resistance to the decrees of the

Convention died out. The dictator would have been his own executioner,

but his faltering terrors stopped him midway in his half-committed

suicide. He and his brother, with their friends, were seized, and

beheaded on the morrow. With the downfall of Robespierre went the last

vestige of social or political authority; for the Convention was no

longer trusted by the nation--the only organized power with popular

support which was left was the army.

This was the news which, traveling southward, finally reached Toulon,

Marseilles, and Nice, cities where Robespierre's stanchest adherents

were flaunting their newly gained importance. No wonder if the brains

of common men reeled. The recent so-called parties had disappeared for

the moment like wraiths. The victorious group in the Convention, now

known as the Thermidorians, was compounded of elements from them both,

and claimed to represent the whole of France as the wretched factions

who had so long controlled the government had never done. Where now

should those who had been active supporters of the late administration

turn for refuge? The Corsicans who had escaped from the island at the

same time with Salicetti and the Buonapartes were nearly all with the

Army of Italy. Employment had been given to them, but, having failed

to keep Corsica for France, they were not in favor. It had already

been remarked in the Committee of Public Safety that their patriotism

was less manifest than their disposition to enrich themselves. This

too was the opinion of many among their own countrymen, especially of

their own partisans shut up in Bastia or Calvi and deserted.

Salicetti, ever ready for emergencies, was not disconcerted by this

one; and with adroit baseness turned informer, denouncing as a

suspicious schemer his former protégé and lieutenant, of whose budding

greatness he was now well aware. He was apparently both jealous and

alarmed. Possibly, however, the whole procedure was a ruse; in the

critical juncture the apparent traitor was by this conduct able

efficiently to succor and save his compatriot.

Buonaparte's mission to Genoa had been openly political; secretly it

was also a military reconnaissance, and his confidential instructions,

virtually dictated by himself, had unfortunately leaked out. They had

directed him to examine the fortifications in and about both Savona

and Genoa, to investigate the state of the Genoese artillery, to

inform himself as to the behavior of the French envoy to the republic,

to learn as much as possible of the intentions of the oligarchy--in

short, to gather all information useful for the conduct of a war "the

result of which it is impossible to foresee." Buonaparte, knowing now

that he had trodden dangerous ground in his unauthorized and secret

dealings with the younger Robespierre, and probably foreseeing the

coming storm, began to shorten sail immediately upon reaching Nice.

Either he was prescient and felt the new influences in the air, or

else a letter now in the war office at Paris, and purporting to have

been written on August seventh to Tilly, the French agent at Genoa, is

an antedated fabrication written later for Salicetti's use.[41]

Speaking, in this paper, of Robespierre the younger, he said: "I was a

little touched by the catastrophe, for I loved him and thought him

spotless. But were it my own father, I would stab him to the heart if

he aspired to become a tyrant." If the letter be genuine, as is

probable, the writer was very far-sighted. He knew that its contents

would speedily reach Paris in the despatches of Tilly, so that it was

virtually a public renunciation of Jacobinism at the earliest possible

date, an anchor to windward in the approaching tempest. But

momentarily the trick was of no avail; he was first superseded in his

command, then arrested on August tenth, and, fortunately for himself,

imprisoned two days later in Fort Carré, near Antibes, instead of

being sent direct to Paris as some of his friends were. This temporary

shelter from the devastating blast he owed to Salicetti, who would, no

doubt, without hesitation have destroyed a friend for his own safety,

but was willing enough to spare him if not driven to extremity.

[Footnote 41: Jung: Bonaparte et son temps, II, 455.]

As the true state of things in Corsica began to be known in France,

there was a general disposition to blame and punish the influential

men who had brought things to such a desperate pass and made the loss

of the island probable, if not certain. Salicetti, Multedo, and the

rest quickly unloaded the whole blame on Buonaparte's shoulders, so

that he had many enemies in Paris. Thus by apparent harshness to one

whom he still considered a subordinate, the real culprit escaped

suspicion. Assured of immunity from punishment himself, Salicetti was

content with his rival's humiliation, and felt no real rancor toward

the family. This is clear from his treatment of Louis Buonaparte, who

had fallen from place and favor along with his brother, but was by

Salicetti's influence soon afterward made an officer of the home guard

at Nice. Joseph had rendered himself conspicuous in the very height of

the storm by a brilliant marriage; but neither he nor Fesch was

arrested, and both managed to pull through with whole skins. The noisy

Lucien was also married, but to a girl who, though respectable, was

poor; and in consequence he was thoroughly frightened at the thought

of losing his means of support. But though menaced with arrest, he was

sufficiently insignificant to escape for the time.

Napoleon was kept in captivity but thirteen days. Salicetti apparently

found it easier than he had supposed to exculpate himself from the

charge either of participating in Robespierre's conspiracy or of

having brought about the Corsican insurrection. More than this, he

found himself firm in the good graces of the Thermidorians, among whom

his old friends Barras and Fréron were held in high esteem. It would

therefore be a simple thing to liberate General Buonaparte, if only a

proper expression of opinion could be secured from him. The clever

prisoner had it ready before it was needed. To the faithful Junot he

wrote a kindly note declining to be rescued by a body of friends

organized to storm the prison or scale its walls.[42] Such a course

would have compromised him further. But to the "representatives of the

people" he wrote in language which finally committed him for life. He

explained that in a revolutionary epoch there are but two classes of

men, patriots and suspects. It could easily be seen to which class a

man belonged who had fought both intestine and foreign foes. "I have

sacrificed residence in my department, I have abandoned all my goods,

I have lost all for the republic. Since then I have served at Toulon

with some distinction, and I have deserved a share with the Army of

Italy in the laurels it earned at the taking of Saorgio, Oneglia, and

Tanaro. On the discovery of Robespierre's conspiracy, my conduct was

that of a man accustomed to regard nothing but principle." The letter

concludes with a passionate appeal to each one of the controlling

officials separately and by name, that is, to both Salicetti and

Albitte, for justice and restoration. "An hour later, if the wicked

want my life, I will gladly give it to them, I care so little for it,

I weary so often of it! Yes; the idea that it may be still useful to

my country is all that makes me bear the burden with courage." The

word for country which he employed, _patrie_, could only be

interpreted as referring to France.

[Footnote 42: Correspondance de Napoléon, I, No. 35.]

Salicetti in person went through the form of examining the papers

offered in proof of Buonaparte's statements; found them, as a matter

of course, satisfactory; and the commissioners restored the suppliant

to partial liberty, but not to his post. He was to remain at army

headquarters, and the still terrible Committee of Safety was to

receive regular reports of his doings. This, too, was but a

subterfuge; on August twentieth he was restored to his rank. A few

weeks later commissioners from the Thermidorians arrived, with orders

that for the present all offensive operations in Italy were to be

suspended in order to put the strength of the district into a maritime

expedition against Rome and ultimately against Corsica, which was now

in the hands of England. Buonaparte immediately sought, and by

Salicetti's favor obtained, the important charge of equipping and

inspecting the artillery destined for the enterprise. He no doubt

hoped to make the venture tell in his personal interest against the

English party now triumphant in his home. This was the middle of

September. Before beginning to prepare for the Corsican expedition,

the army made a final demonstration to secure its lines. It was during

the preparatory days of this short campaign that a dreadful incident

occurred. Buonaparte had long since learned the power of women, and

had been ardently attentive in turn both to Mme. Robespierre and to

Mme. Ricord. "It was a great advantage to please them," he said; "for

in a lawless time a representative of the people is a real power."

Mme. Turreau, wife of one of the new commissioners, was now the

ascendant star in his attentions. One day, while walking arm in arm

with her near the top of the Tenda pass, Buonaparte took a sudden

freak to show her what war was like, and ordered the advance-guard to

charge the Austrian pickets. The attack was not only useless, but it

endangered the safety of the army; yet it was made according to

command, and human blood was shed. The story was told by Napoleon

himself, at the close of his life, in a tone of repentance, but with

evident relish.[43]

[Footnote 43: Las Cases: Mémorial de Sainte-Hélène, I,

141.]

Buonaparte was present at the ensuing victories, but only as a

well-informed spectator and adviser, for he was yet in nominal

disgrace. Within five days the enemies' lines were driven back so as

to leave open the two most important roads into Italy--that by the

valley of the Bormida to Alessandria, and that by the shore to Genoa.

The difficult pass of Tenda fell entirely into French hands. The

English could not disembark their troops to strengthen the Allies. The

commerce of Genoa with Marseilles was reëstablished by land. "We have

celebrated the fifth sansculottide of the year II (September

twenty-first, 1794) in a manner worthy of the republic and the

National Convention," wrote the commissioners to their colleagues in

Paris. On the twenty-fourth, General Buonaparte was released by them

from attendance at headquarters, thus becoming once again a free man

and his own master. He proceeded immediately to Toulon in order to

prepare for the Corsican expedition. Once more the power of a great

nation was, he hoped, to be directed against the land of his birth,

and he was an important agent in the plan.

To regain, if possible, some of his lost influence in the island,

Buonaparte had already renewed communication with former acquaintances

in Ajaccio. In a letter written immediately after his release in

September, 1794, to the Corsican deputy Multedo, he informed his

correspondent that his birthplace was the weakest spot on the island,

and open to attack. The information was correct. Paoli had made an

effort to strengthen it, but without success. "To drive the English,"

said the writer of the letter, "from a position which makes them

masters of the Mediterranean, ... to emancipate a large number of good

patriots still to be found in that department, and to restore to their

firesides the good republicans who have deserved the care of their

country by the generous manner in which they have suffered for

it,--this, my friend, is the expedition which should occupy the

attention of the government." His fortune was in a sense dependent on

success: the important position of artillery inspector could not be

held by an absentee and it was soon filled by the appointment of a

rival compatriot, Casabianca. In the event of failure Buonaparte would

be destitute. Perhaps the old vista of becoming a Corsican hero opened

up once again to a sore and disappointed man, but it is not probable:

the horizon of his life had expanded too far to be again contracted,

and the present task was probably considered but as a bridge to cross

once more the waters of bitterness. On success or failure hung his

fate. Two fellow-adventurers were Junot and Marmont. The former was

the child of plain French burghers, twenty-three years old, a daring,

swaggering youth, indifferent to danger, already an intimate of

Napoleon's, having been his secretary at Toulon. His chequered destiny

was interwoven with that of his friend and he came to high position.

But though faithful to the end, he was always erratic and troublesome;

and in an attack of morbid chagrin he came to a violent end in 1813.

The other comrade was but a boy of twenty, the son of an officer who,

though of the lower nobility, was a convinced revolutionary. The boys

had met several years earlier at Dijon and again as young men at

Toulon, where the friendship was knitted which grew closer and closer

for twenty years. At Wagram, Marmont became a marshal. Already he had

acquired habits of luxurious ease and the doubtful fortunes of his

Emperor exasperated him into critical impatience. He so magnified his

own importance that at last he deserted. The labored memoirs he wrote

are the apology for his life and for his treachery. Though without

great genius, he was an able man and an industrious recorder of

valuable impressions. Not one of the three accomplished anything

during the Corsican expedition; their common humiliation probably

commended both of his junior comrades to Buonaparte's tenderness, and

thereafter both enjoyed much of his confidence, especially Marmont, in

whom it was utterly misplaced.

The Life of Napoleon Bonaparte. Vol. 1 (of 4) · 第 19 / 34 章