The View of Classical Scholars

They (ii. 735) begin by pointing out Artemis's connection with Apollo and

the moon. So do I! 'If Apollo soon disengages himself from the sun . .

. Artemis retains as few traces of any connection with the moon.' {143e}

'If Apollo was of solar origin,' asks the author (ii. 735), 'what could

his sister Artemis have been, from the very beginning, if not some

goddess connected with the moon?' Very likely; quis negavit? Then our

author, like myself (loc. cit.), dilates on Artemis as 'sister of

Apollo.' 'Her chapels,' I say, 'are in the wild wood; she is the abbess

of the forest nymphs,' 'chaste and fair, the maiden of the precise life.'

How odd! The classical scholar and I both say the same things; and I add

a sonnet to Artemis in this aspect, rendered by me from the Hippolytus of

Euripides. Could a classical scholar do more? Our author then says that

the Greek sportsman 'surprised the beasts in their lairs' by night. Not

very sportsmanlike! I don't find it in Homer or in Xenophon. Oh for

exact references! The moon, the nocturnal sportswoman, is Artemis: here

we have also the authority of Theodore de Banville (Diane court dans la

noire foret). And the nocturnal hunt is Dian's; so she is protectress of

the chase. Exactly what I said! {144a}

All this being granted by me beforehand (though possibly that might not

be guessed from my critic), our author will explain Artemis's human

sacrifice of a girl in a fawn-skin--bloodshed, bear and all--with no aid

from Kamilarois, Cahrocs, and Samoans.

Modern Mythology · 第 131 / 171 题