LESSON XIII.

In Judea, the creditor could take the children of the debtor, and keep

them as his slaves, to labour until the debt was paid; and among the

Gentiles this right was not only in existence, but in most cases the

child could be subjected to perpetual slavery, and in many instances the

debtor himself could thus be reduced to bondage. Improvement had been

made in this respect, as will be seen by the following document, found

in lib. iii. indic. xii. epist. xliii.

* * * * *

GREGORIUS, Fantino Defensori:

_De Cosma Syro multis debitis obligato._

Lator præsentium, Cosmas Syrus, in negotio quod agebat, debitum se

contraxisse perhibuit, quod, et multis aliis et lacrymis ejus

attestantibus, verum esse credidimus. Et quia 150 solidos debebat, volui

ut creditores illius cum eo aliquid paciscerentur: quoniam et lex habet,

ut homo liber pro debito nullatenus teneatur, si res defuerint, quæ

possunt eidem debito addici, creditores ergo suos, ut asserit, ad 80

solidos consentire possibile est. Sed quia multum est ut a nil habente

homine 80 solidos petant, 60 solidos per notarium tuum tibi

transmisimus; ut cum eisdem creditoribus subtiliter loquaris, rationem

reddas, quia filium ejus quem tenere dicuntur, secundum leges tenere non

possunt. Et si potest fieri, ad aliquod minus quam nos dedimus,

condescendant. Et quidquid de eisdem 60 solidis remanserit, ipsi trade,

ut cum filio suo exinde vivere valeat. Si autem nil remanet, ad eamdem

summam debitum ejus incidere stude, ut possit sibi libere postmodum

laborare. Hoc tamen solerter age, ut acceptis solidis ei plenariam

munitionem scripto faciant.

* * * * *

“GREGORY, to the Proctor Fantinus:

_Of Cosmas, the Syrian, deeply in debt._

“The bearer hereof, Cosmas the Syrian, has informed us that he

contracted many debts in the business in which he was engaged. We

believe it to be true; he has testified it with many tears and

witnesses. And, as he owes 150 shillings, I wish his creditors would

make some composition with him. And as the law regulates that no freeman

shall be held for a debt, if there be no goods which can be attached for

that debt, he says that his creditors may be induced to accept 80

shillings; but it is extravagant on their part to ask 80 shillings from

a man who has nothing. We have sent you 60 shillings by your notary,

that you may have a discrete conference with his creditors, and explain

matters to them, because they cannot legally hold his son, whom they are

said to keep. And if they will come down to any thing less, by your

efforts, than the sum that we send, should any thing remain of the 60

shillings, give it to him to help to support himself and his son; should

nothing be left, exert yourself to have his debt cancelled by that

amount sent, so that henceforth he may be free to exert himself for his

own benefit. But be careful, in doing this, to get for him a full

receipt and discharge in writing for this money that they get.”

The law to which the pope refers, and by which the persons of the

unfortunate debtor and his family were protected, is found in Novell.

134, c. vii., and was enacted by Justinian I. in 541.

_Ne quis creditor filium debitoris pro debito retinere præsumat._

Quia verò et hujuscemodi iniquitatem in diversis locis nostræ reipublicæ

cognovimus admitti, quia, creditores filios debitorum præsumunt retinere

aut in pignus, aut in servile ministerium, aut in conductionem: hoc

modis omnibus prohibemus: et jubemus ut si quis hujusmodi aliquid

deliquerit, non solum debito cadat, sed tantam aliam quantitatem

adjiciat dandam ei qui retentus est ab eo, aut parentibus ejus, et post

hoc etiam corporalibus pœnis ipsum subdi a loci judice; quia personam

liberam pro debito præsumpserit retinere aut locare aut pignorare.

“That no creditor should presume to retain for debt the son of the

debtor.

“And because we have known that this sort of injustice has been allowed

in several places of our commonwealth,—that creditors presume to keep

the children of their debtors, either in pledge or in slavish

employment, or to hire them out. We by all means forbid all this: and we

order that, if any person shall be guilty of any of these things, not

only shall he lose the debt, but he shall in addition give an equal sum,

to be paid to the person that was held by him, or to the parents of such

person; and, beyond this, he shall be subjected to corporal punishment

by the local judge, because he presumed to restrain or to hire out, or

keep in pledge, a free person.”

The following document will exhibit in some degree the origin of the

principle of escheats to be found in slavery. The slave being freed upon

certain conditions, if they were not fulfilled the master of course

re-entered upon his rights. The manumitted slave was sometimes allowed,

not only freedom, but a certain gift, and often with the condition that,

if he had not lawful issue, the gift, and its increase by his industry,

should revert to the master or his heir. So, in after times, the lord of

the soil, or the monarch, gave portions of land to his vassals upon

condition of service, and, upon failure of service or of heirs, his land

escheated, or went back to the lord of the soil.

The document is found in lib. v. indic. xiv. epist. xii.

* * * * *

GREGORIUS, Montanæ et Thomæ:

_Libertatem dat, et eos cives Romanos efficit._

Cum Redemptor noster totius conditor creaturæ ad hoc propitiatus humanam

voluerit carnem assumere, ut divinitatis suæ gratia, dirupto quo

tenebamur captivi vinculo servitutis, pristinæ nos restitueret

libertati: salubriter agitur, si homines quos ab initio natura liberos

protulit, et jus gentium jugo substituit servitutis, in eâ naturâ in quâ

nati fuerant, manumittentis beneficio, libertati reddantur. Atque ideo

pietatis intuitu, et hujus rei consideratione permoti, vos Montanam

atque Thomam famulos sanctæ Romanæ ecclesiæ, cui, Deo adjutore,

deservimus, liberos ex hac die, civesque Romanos efficimus, omneque

vestrum vobis relaxamus servitutis peculium. Et quia tu, Montana, animum

te ad conversionem fateris appulisse monachicam: idcirco duas uncias,

quas tibi quondam Gaudiosus presbyter per supremæ suæ voluntatis

arbitrium institutionis modo noscitur reliquisse, hac die tibi donamus,

atque concedimus omnia scilicet monasterio Sancti Laurentii cui

Constantina abbatissa præest, in quo converti Deo miserante festinas,

modis omnibus profutura. Si quid vero de rebus suprascripti Gaudiosi te

aliquomodo celasse constituerit, id totum ecclesiæ nostræ juri sine

dubio mancipetur. Tibi autem, suprascripto Thomæ, quem pro libertatis

tuæ cumulo etiam inter notarios volumus militare, quinque uncias, quas

præfatus Gaudiosus presbyter per ultimam voluntatem hereditario tibi

nomine dereliquit, simul et sponsalia quæ matri tuæ conscripserat,

similiter hac die per hujus manumissionis paginam donamus, atque

concedimus, eâ sane lege, atque conditione subnexâ, ut si sine filiis

legitimis, hoc est, de legitimo susceptis conjugio, te obire contigerit,

omnia quæ tibi concessimus, ad jus sanctæ Romanæ ecclesiæ sine

diminutione aliquâ revertantur. Si autem filios de conjugio, sicut

diximus, cognitos lege susceperis, eosque superstites reliqueris,

earumdem to rerum dominum sine quadam statuimus conditione persistere,

et testamentum de his faciendi liberam tibi tribuimus potestatem. Hæc

igitur, quæ per hujus manumissionis chartulam statuimus, atque

concessimus, nos successoresque nostros, sine aliquâ scitote

refragatione servare. Nam justitiæ ac rationis ordo suadet, ut qui sua a

successoribus desiderat mandata servari, decessoris sui proculdubio

voluntatem et statuta custodiat. Hanc autem manumissionis paginam

Paterio notario scribendam dictavimus, et propriâ manu unà cum tribus

presbyteris prioribus et tribus diaconis pro plenissimâ firmitate

subscripsimus, vobisque tradidimus. Actum in urbe Româ.

* * * * *

“GREGORY to Montana and Thomas:

“He emancipates them, and makes them Roman citizens.

“Since our Redeemer, the Maker of every creature, mercifully vouchsafed

to take human flesh, that, breaking the chain by which we were held

captive, he may, by the grace of his divinity, restore us to our first

liberty, it is then salutary that they whom he at first made free by

nature, and whom the law of nations subjected to the yoke of slavery,

should in the nature in which they were born be restored to liberty by

that kindness of their emancipator. And therefore, moved by this

consideration, and in respect to piety, we make you, Montana and Thomas,

slaves of the holy Roman church, in whose service we are by God’s help

engaged, from this day forward free and Roman citizens. And we release

to you all your allowance of slavery.

“And because you, Montana, have declared that it was your wish to enter

into the monastic state, we give and grant to you this day two ounces,

which it is well known were formerly left as a legacy to you for

inheritance by the priest Gaudiosus, to be by all means available to the

monastery of St. Lawrence, over which Constantina is superioress, and

into which you desire anxiously by God’s mercy to be admitted. But

should it appear that you have concealed any of the effects of the said

Gaudiosus, the entire thereof doubtless is by right for the service of

our church.

“But to you, the said Thomas, whom, in addition to the bestowal of

freedom, we desire to be enrolled in service among our notaries, we

likewise this day give and grant, by this charter of manumission, five

ounces which the same Gaudiosus the priest left to you by name in his

last will, and the portion which he assigned for your mother, but upon

this ground and condition well attached, that, should you die without

issue by lawful marriage, all those goods which we have granted to you

shall come back, without any diminution, under the dominion of the holy

Roman church; but should you leave behind you children lawfully

recognised from your marriage, we give to you full power to hold the

same effects as their owner, and without any condition, and to make free

disposition of the same by will.

“Know you, therefore, that what we have thus, by this charter of

manumission, enacted and granted to you, bind, without any gainsay,

ourselves and our successors for its observance. For the order of

justice and of reason requires that he who desires his own commands to

be observed by his successors, should also doubtless observe the will

and the statutes of his predecessor.

“We have dictated this writing of manumission to be copied by our notary

Paterius, and have for its most perfect stability subscribed it with our

hand, and with those of three of the more dignified priests and three

deacons, and delivered them to you.

“Done in the city of Rome, &c.”

* * * * *

One of the subjects which at all times caused slavery to be surrounded

with great difficulties was the result of marriage. The liability to

separation of those married was a more galling affliction in the

Christian law, where the Saviour made marriage indissoluble, and it

often happened that an avaricious or capricious owner cared as little

for the marriage bond as he did for the natural tie of affection. Hence,

as Christianity became the religion of the state, or of the great body

of the people, it was imperatively demanded that some restraint should

be placed upon that absolute power which the owners sometimes abused, of

wantonly making these separations. On the other hand, the association of

the sexes made marriage desirable: it was ordained by God to be the

general state of the bulk of mankind, and even the self-interest or the

avarice of the master calculated upon its results. Then again the slave

dreaded separation, not only because of the violence committed on the

most sacred affections, but also because, though the husband and wife

should be separated by impassable barriers, yet the bond of their union

subsisted, and could be severed by death alone.

This was a strong temptation to both master and slave to prefer

concubinage to wedlock.

Another difficulty arose, in cases of the colonist, by reason of the

claims of the several owners where colonists of distinct estates and

different owners intermarried. In the case of perfect slaves, the child

generally followed the mother, both as regarded condition and property.

This was not, however, universally the case. But the owners of colonized

lands set up different claims. At length the dispute was settled in the

Roman Empire by a law of Justinian, in 539, Novell. clxii. cap. iii.,

and confirmed by a decision in a case brought up by the church-wardens

of Apamea, in Phrygia, in 541, on the kalends of March, by dividing

equally the progeny between the estates to which the parents belonged,

giving the preference, in all cases of uneven number, to that estate to

which the mother was attached. Nov. clvii. tit. xxxix.

The following law concerning marriages and the separation of married

persons from each other, and of children from their parents, is of the

same date.

NOVELL. CLVII. _De Rusticis qui in alienis prædiis nuptias contrahunt._

Tit. xl.

Imp. Justin. August. Lazaro Comiti Orientis.

Præfatio. Ex his quæ diverso modo ad nos relata sunt, didicimus in

Mesopotamiâ et Osdroenâ provinciis quidquam delinqui, nostris plane

temporibus indignum: consuetudinem etiam apud ipsos esse, ut qui ex

diversis originem trahant prædiis, nuptias inter se contrahant. Inde

sane conari dominos, de facto jam contractas nuptias dissolvere, aut

procreatos filios a parentibus abstrahere, exindeque totum ilium locum

misere affligi, dum et rusticani viri et mulieres ex unâ parte

distrahantur, et proles his adimitur, qui in lucem produxerunt, et solâ

nostrâ opus esse providentiâ.

Cap. I. Sancimus igitur, ut prædiorum domini de cætero rusticos suos,

prout voluerint, conservent: neque quisquam eos qui jam conjuncti sunt

possit secundum consuetudinem prius obtinentem divellere, aut compellere

ut terram ad ipsos pertinentem colant, abstrahereve a parentibus filios

prætextu conditionis colonariæ. Sed et si quid hujusmodi forte jam

factum est, corrigi hoc simul, et restitui efficies, sive filios

abstrahi contigerit, sive etiam mulieres, nempe vel a parentibus, vel

contubernii consortibus: eo, qui reliquo deinceps tempore hujusmodi

aliquid facere præsumpserit, etiam de ipso prædio in periculum vocando.

Quare libera sunto contubernia metu, qui dudum ipsis immittitur, et

parentes habento ex hac jussione filios suos: nequeuntibus prædiorum

dominis subtilibus contendere rationibus, et vel nuptias contrahentes

vel filios abstrahere. Qui enim tale quid facere præsumpserit, etiam de

ipso prædio in periculum veniet, cui eos vindicare rusticos attentat.

Epilogus. Quæ igitur nobis placuerunt, et per sacram hanc pragmaticam

declarantur fornam, eam providentiam habeto magnificentia tua, tibique

obtemperans cohors, et qui pro tempore eundem magistratum geret; ut ad

effectum deducantur conserventurque, trium librarum auri pœna imminenti

ei, qui ullo unquam tempore hæc transgredi attentaverit. Dat. Kal. Maii,

Constantinop. D.N. Justin. PP. Aug. Bisil. V.C. Cons.

* * * * *

“_Of country persons who contract marriage on divers estates._ The

Emperor JUSTINIAN AUGUSTUS, to Lazarus the Count of the East.

“Preamble. We have learned by relation in various ways, that a

delinquency quite unworthy of our times is allowed in the provinces of

Mesopotamia and of Osdroene. They have a custom of having marriage

contracted between those born on different estates: whence the masters

endeavour to dissolve marriages actually contracted, or to take away

from the parents the children who are their issue; upon which account

that entire place is miserably afflicted, while country people, husbands

and wives, are drawn away from each other, and the children whom they

brought into light are taken away from them; and that there needs for

the regulation only our provision.

“Chapter I. Wherefore, we enact, that otherwise the masters of the

aforesaid keep their colonists as they will; but, it shall not be

allowed, by virtue of any custom heretofore introduced and in existence,

to put away from each other those who were married, or to force them to

cultivate the land belonging to themselves, or to take away children

from their parents, under the colour of colonial condition. And you will

be careful that if any thing of this sort has haply been already done,

the same be corrected and restitution made, whether it be that children

were taken away from their parents or women from their consorts of

marriage. And for any who shall in future presume to act in this way, it

shall be at the hazard of losing the estate itself.

“Wherefore, let marriages of servants be exempt from that fear which has

hitherto hung over them: and from the issue of this order, let the

parents have their children. It shall not be competent for the lords of

the estates to strive by any subtle arguments either to take away those

who contract marriage, or their children. For he who shall presume to do

any such thing shall incur the risk of losing that estate for which he

attempts to claim those colonists.

“Epilogue. That therefore which has been good in our view, and is

declared by this sacred pragmatic form, let your magnificence provide to

have carried into execution, and the cohort which obeys you, as also he

who for the time being shall hold the same magisterial office. To the

end, then, that this edict may produce its effect and continue in force,

let him who may at any time violate its enactments be liable to a

penalty of three pounds of gold.

“Given at Constantinople, on the kalends of May, our most pious lord

Justinian being Augustus, and the most renowned Basil being consul.”

To rectify this, it became a principle, where an estate was large and

the colonists numerous, to confine the choice of the servants within the

bounds of the property; and thus marriage had its full sanctity, and

families remained without separation.

We have an instance of the exercise of this right, by Pope St. Gregory,

in a document found in lib. x. indic. v. epist. 28.

* * * * *

GREGORIUS, Romano Defensori.

_De filiis Petri defensoris extra massam in qua nati sunt non

jungendis._

Petrus quem defensorem fecimus, quia de massa juris ecclesiæ nostræ, quæ

Vitelas dicitur, oriundus sit, experientiæ tuæ bene est cognitum. Et

ideo quia circa eum benigni debemus existere, ut tamen ecclesiæ utilitas

non lædatur: hac tibi præeptione mandamus, ut eum districte debeas

admonere, ne filios suos quolibet ingenio vel excusatione foris alicubi

in conjugio sociare præsumat, sed in eâ massâ, cui lege et conditione

ligati sunt, socientur. In quâ re etiam et tuam omnino necesse est

experientiam esse sollicitam, atque eos terrere, ut qualibet occasione

de possessione cui oriundo subjecti sunt exire non debeant. Nam si quis

eorum exinde, quod non credimus, exire præsumpserit; certum illi est

quia noster consensus nunquam illi aderit, ut foris de massâ in quâ nati

sunt, aut habitare aut debeant sociari, sed et superscribi terram eorum.

Atque tunc sciatis vos non leve periculum sustinere, si vobis

negligentibus quisquam ipsorum quidquam de iis quæ prohibemus facere

qualibet sorte tentaverit.

* * * * *

“GREGORY to the Proctor Romanus.

“_Of not marrying the children of Peter the Proctor, without the limits

of the estate upon which they were born._

“You, experienced sir, are well aware that Peter, whom we made a

proctor, is a native of the estate of our church territory which is

called Vitelas. And as our desire is to act towards him with such favour

as is compatible with avoiding any injury to the church, we command you

by this precept, that you should strictly warn him not to presume, under

any pretext or excuse, to have his children joined in wedlock anywhere

but on that estate to which they may be bound by law or by condition. In

which matter it is quite necessary that you, experienced sir, be very

careful, and instil into them a fear to prevent any of them from going

on any account beyond the estate to which they are subject by origin.

For if any one of them shall presume, as we believe he will not, to go

thence, let him be assured that he shall never have our consent either

to dwell or to associate himself without the estate on which he was

born, but that the land of any such person shall be more heavily charged

(_superscribi_). And know you, that if, by your negligence, any of them

shall attempt to do any of those things which we prohibit, you will

incur no small danger.”

* * * * *

Many of the restrictions on marriage that are found in subsequent ages,

under the feudal system, had their origin in this principle, because

indeed the vassal, in feudal times, was but a slave under a more loose

dominion in a mitigated form.

The following document shows that, in the west, the separation of

married persons was very uncommon, (quam sit inauditum atque crudele,

_unheard of and cruel_.) It is found in lib. iii. indic. iii. ep. xii.

* * * * *

GREGORIUS, Maximiano Episcopo Syracusano.

_De uxore cujusdam ablatâ et alteri venumdatâ._

Tanta nobis subinde mala, quæ aguntur in istâ provinciâ, nunciantur, ut

peccatis facientibus, quod avertat omnipotens Deus, celeriter eam

perituram credamus. Præsentium namque portitor veniens lacrymabiliter

quæstus est, ante plurimos annos ab homine nescio quo de possessione

Messanensis ecclesiæ de fontibus se susceptum, et violenter diversis

suasionibus puellæ ipsius junctum, ex quâ juvenculos filios jam habere

se asseruit, et quam nunc violenter huic disjunctam abstulisse dicitur,

atque cuidam alii venumdedisse. Quod si verum est, quam sit inauditum

atque crudele malum, tua bone dilectio perspicit. Ideoque admonemus, ut

hoc tantum nefas sub ea vivacite, quam te in causis piis habere

certissime scimus, requiras atque discutias. Et si ita, ut supradictus

portitor insinuavit, esse cognoveris, non solum quod male factum est, ad

statum pristinum revocare curabis; sed et vindictam, quæ Deum possit

placare, exhibere modis omnibus festinabis. Episcopum vero, qui homines

suos talia agentes corrigere negligit atque emendare, vehementer

aggredere, proponens, quia si denuo talis ad nos de quoquam qui ad eum

pertinet quærela pervenerit, non in eum qui excesserit, sed in ipsum

canonice vindicta procedet.

* * * * *

“GREGORY to Maximian, Bishop of Syracuse.

“_Concerning the wife of some one that was taken away and sold to

another._

“We are told of so many bad things done in that province, that we are

led to believe, which may God forbid, the place must soon be destroyed.

“Now, the bearer of these presents complained to us in a pitiable

manner, that many years ago, some man whom I know not, belonging to the

church of Messina stood as his sponsor at baptism, and prevailed upon

him by extreme urgency to marry his servant, by whom, he says, he has

now young children, and whom now this man has violently taken away and

sold to another. If this be true, you, our beloved, will see plainly how

unheard of and how cruel is the evil. We therefore admonish you to look

into and to sift so great a crime, with that earnestness which we

assuredly know you have in matters of piety: and should you come to know

that the fact is as the aforesaid bearer has stated, you will be careful

not only to bring back to its former state that which was badly done,

but you will quickly, by all means, have that punishment inflicted which

may appease God. Give a severe lecture to the bishop that neglected to

correct or to amend his people who do such things; setting before him

that if a like complaint comes to us again of any one who belongs to

him, canonical process for punishment shall issue, not against the one

that shall have done wrong, but against himself.”

------------------

Studies on Slavery, in Easy Lessons · 第 113 / 254 题