OPERATIC NOTES.

[Illustration: L'Attaque du Moulin (a poivre)]

It strikes me forcibly that the Wagnerian idea has influenced all recent

compositions. Nothing is now done without a "motive." It may be a good

motive, or a bad motive, or an inadequate motive, or an indifferent

motive; but motive there must be with our most modern school of

composers, who, adopting the Wagnerian idea, (not in itself a purely

original one,) and improving on it, attribute less importance to the

"Act" than to the "motive," though by a reflex action the scheme of the

Act suggests, organises, and it may be added, orchestrates the

"motives." _L'Attaque du Moulin_ is a practical example of this theory.

It is not styled an opera but a lyric drama in four acts. It is founded

by M. LOUIS GALLET on ZOLA'S story; it is reduced to plain English by

Mr. WEATHERLY; the music is by ALFRED BRUNEAU; and for the stage

management, which has so largely conduced to its success, Sir AUGUSTUS

DRURIOLANUS is responsible. It is not what the sporting papers term "a

merry mill," though there is plenty of fighting. There _are_ some songs

in it, and there are some melodies--or mill-odies--which may catch on

when heard a second or third time; but they certainly do not arrest the

attention at a first hearing. The music, I judge only from the one

representation, seems lacking in those catching-on airs which, coupled

with the admirable acting of the principals, made the fortune, _sur le

champ_, of the _Cavalleria Rusticana_. But a "wind-mill" without any

"air" can't be expected to "go."

Madame DELNA is forcibly dramatic, true, but not powerful as a singer,

at least in Covent Garden. Nor is there in the character of this Maid of

the Mill any such great opportunity whereby to test the power of the

actress as there is in the part of _Santuzza_, or of _Anita_ in _La

Navarraise_. Madame DELNA may be all that enthusiastic reporters have

said she is, but she must have a great deal of power in reserve, for the

display of which this opera does not offer the chance. Mons. BOUVET as

_Merlier_, the Miller, who "created" the part in Paris, is good, but his

acting is somewhat monotonous. Madame DE NUOVINA as _Francoise_, is a

young _Lady Macbeth_, who gives the dagger and does not request that it

may be returned to her again when done with. M. BONNARD, as the _Singing

Sentinel_, reminding me of GILBERT and SULLIVAN'S _Sentinel_ "with a

song" in one of the Savoy Series, was very good; and Mons. COSSIRA,

excellent as the escaping prisoner, bore so strong a resemblance to the

Director of the Fortunes of Covent Garden and Drury Lane, that people

looked twice at their programmes in order to be quite sure that an

apology for the singer had not been made, and that the much-talented Sir

DRURIOLANUS had not, at the shortest possible notice, consented to be

his "_remplacant_." Mons. ALBERS, as the _German Captain_, ought to be

in receipt of a very large salary, seeing "how wide he opens his mouth"

when singing. All were good in the best of all possible operatic

entertainments, including the unequalled orchestra conducted by M. PH.

FLON, (is this "Phlon-FLON"?) who has taken his turn with Signori

BEVIGNANI, MANCINELLI, and Mr. FREDERIC COWEN, the last-mentioned coming

to look after his new Opera of _Signa_, in which Madame DE NUOVINA was

charming, and Signor BENJAMINO DAVIESO appeared as the Anglo-Italian

Tenor. Congratulations to Signor FREDERICO COWENI.

_Saturday night._ _Elaine._ "If it's not very lively," observes Sir

AUGUSTUS beforehand, "still it must be remembered that I have not only

at heart the interests--and in pocket the interest--of Covent Garden,

but also of '_Drear Elaine_.' Should it prove a joyous opera and attract

the people, then I shall consider it as an example of 'Drawer-Elaine' at

Covent Garden. But now--hark!--let us not trifle with time and tune.

MANCINELLI is raising his _baton_, up goes the curtain, and all in to

begin. _Nous verrons._" And the "all" includes the Prince and Princess

of WALES and their two unmarried daughters, and a very good house

indeed. "And how is _Elaine_?" is the question. "Very well, thank you,

and much better than she was two years ago," is the reply. _Elaine_ is

decidedly thinner. One Act gone, and other judicious cuts have reduced

her. The opera is consequently lighter. Due weight, however, is given to

it by Madame MELBA and JEAN DE RESZKE. DRURIOLANUS has followed the

precedent of "cutting the 'osses." But the "cackle" of geese followeth

not. On the contrary, the applause is abundant.

* * * * *

[Illustration: MUSIC AT HOME.

_Hostess._ "OH, THANK YOU FOR YOUR LOVELY MUSIC, HERR BLUMENTOFF! IT'S

JUST WHAT I LIKE. IT BLENDS SO PERFECTLY WITH THE CONVERSATION WITHOUT

IN THE LEAST INTERRUPTING IT!"]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 107, July 14th 1894 · 第 12 / 27 题