Assuredly, one who observed such nicety in his carving must have been

extremely painstaking in compounding his _liaisons_. Indeed, the

conscientiousness manifest throughout the pages of his manual easily

enables one to foresee how his chagrin at the absence of the roast at

two of the tables and his not having received the fish at the fête

of Condé so preyed upon his mind as to lead him, during a moment

of despair, to fall upon his own sword.[10] With his sense of the

proprieties so highly keyed, one can also fancy how he must have been

shocked on hearing of the prince's awkwardness at a tavern where Condé,

after proclaiming his ability as a cook before a number of companions,

ignominiously overturned an omelette into the fire, and was compelled

to return the spider to the more skilful hands of the hostess. A

similar gaucherie is related of Napoleon I when, one day at the

Tuileries, insisting on taking the place of the Empress Marie-Louise,

who was making an omelette herself in her own apartments, he awkwardly

flipped it on the floor, and was obliged to confess his inaptitude and

allow the empress to proceed with her cooking.

During the regency of Philippe d'Orléans, attention became directed to

the chemistry of cooking, the dinners of the regent being celebrated

for their combination of refinement and art--"for splendidly larded

viands, matelotes of the most tempting quality, and turkeys superbly

stuffed."

Louis XV, who was himself a practitioner of remarkable skill,

continued, with the aid of his cooks--Moustier and Vincent de la

Chapelle--to foster the development which his predecessors had

promoted. "Who could enumerate," says Mercier, "all the dishes of

the new cuisine? It is an absolutely new idiom. I have tasted viands

prepared in so many ways and fashioned with such art that I could not

imagine what they were." "Louis XV ate astoundingly," says Barbier;

"although his stomach was extremely elastic, he forced it to such an

extent that his indigestions were of great frequency, and called for

constant medication. Already at an early age he became a great drinker

of champagne, and set the mode for cold pâtés of larks. The table was

the only serious occupation of his life." On hunting-days it was a

frequent practice of the king to give a dinner for his courtiers at

which each was called upon to prepare a dish. De la Gorse mentions

a dinner given at St. Hubert where all the dishes were prepared by

the Prince de Beaufremont, the Marquis de Polignac, and the Ducs de

Gontaut, d'Ayen, de Coigny, and de la Vallière, the king on his part

contributing the _poulets au basilic_.

At this period there appeared, among innumerable cook-books, a work of

four volumes entitled, "Suppers of the Court," a treatise which has

been pronounced one of the best and most complete of its kind.[11]

To Louis XV belongs the invention of _tables volantes_, or, to speak

more truly, the revival of tables à la Trimalchio--like those devised

during the times of the old Romans--which descended after each course

through the floor, to appear reladen with new surprises. It was to

this monarch, who insisted that women could not rise to the sublime

heights of the cuisine, that Madame du Barry gave the successful supper

from which, it was said, originated the order of the _cordon bleu_ for

accomplished artisans of her sex. This was the menu, as elaborated

by the best cuisinière that the reigning favourite could procure:

_Coulis de faisan_, _petites croustades de foie de lottes_, _salmis de

bécassines_, _pain de volaille à la suprème_, _poularde au cresson_,

_écrevisses au vin de sauterne_, _biscuits de pêches au noyau_, _crême

de cerneaux_, and _fraises au marasquin_. Lady Morgan asserts, however,

that this title was first given to Marie, a celebrated cuisinière

of the tax-gatherer who built the palace of l'Elysée Bourbon. Still

another explanation of the term is that it originated with Madame de

Maintenon, who established a school at St. Cyr for the education of

the orphan daughters of ennobled officers. The pupils were carefully

instructed in the culinary art, and to those who excelled a blue ribbon

was presented as a badge of reward.

Again, if we accept a reference of Albert Glatigny in one of his two

airy poems on old Versailles, the term would appear to concern the

Marquise de Montespan, who, as has already been stated, was a cook of

no little merit:

"Parfois le soir, au bras d'un militaire

Vêtu d'azur, arrogant comme un paon,

Un cordon-bleu passait avec mystère,

Et l'on disait, 'Louis et Montespan!'"

(Sometimes at eve, on arm of cavalier

Bedight in blue, like some proud peacock's van,

A cordon-bleu pass'd by with mystic air,

The while one said, "Louis and Montespan!")

In order to captivate the affections of her royal master more readily,

the Duchesse de Châteauroux secured the most versatile kitchener who

was to be found; and the wily and beautiful Marquise de Pompadour,

thinking that the surest way to a man's heart is through his stomach,

created _filets de volaille à la bellevue_, _palais de bœuf à la

Pompadour_, and _tendrons d'aigneau à la soleil_. But the Louis were

proverbially fickle--there were fillettes as well as filets; and while

these culinary novelties appealed to the jaded royal palate for the

time, they failed to retain the royal affections or wrest the monarch

from his life of dissipation.

The refinements of the science were lost upon Louis XVI, whose robust

appetite needed only to be appeased by "pieces of resistance"--the

art, nevertheless, continuing to flourish under the nobility, the

wealthy financiers, and the ecclesiastics. New discoveries continued

to be made, and the relation of cookery to man's psychical nature--the

affinity of the spirit with the stomach--became more and more apparent.

Thus it was observed by the Maréchal de Mouchy, who so valiantly

defended the king when the palace was attacked by a mob, that the flesh

of the pigeon possesses especial sedative or consoling virtues. It was

accordingly his wont, whenever he had lost a relative or a friend, to

say to his cook:

"You will serve me with two roast pigeons for dinner; I have noticed

that after eating a brace of pigeons I arise from the table feeling

much more resigned."

During the Revolution, when the court had ceased to exist and private

establishments were no longer maintained, cookery necessarily

languished for a period--to blossom anew in that familiar feature of

the French capital, the restaurant. Internal dissension, in closing

the hôtels of the wealthy, was thus the means of throwing numbers of

master-cooks out of employment, who subsequently turned restaurateurs,

and not a few of whom became millionaires. With the restaurants, the

dealers in delicacies and provisions increased proportionately, and

dining and good living advanced apace.

A striking example of a gastronomer philanthropist is that of the

Vicomte de Barras, surnamed _le beau_, who flourished during the

Directory, and who was celebrated for his dinners, his prodigality,

and his gallantry. During his later years he continued to entertain

sumptuously, although obliged to confine himself to a single dish--a

large plate of rusk moistened with the juice of an underdone leg of

mutton. At his banquets a lackey was always stationed back of the

chair of each guest to see that he was never obliged to wait. Among

the countless menus of his entertainments, the following, signed by

himself and accompanied by a note in his own handwriting, will show the

excellence of his dinners and his solicitude for his guests. It will be

noted that, apart from the lavish provision made for the gentler sex in

the dessert, the menu was one of quality as opposed to mere quantity:

Carte Dinatoire

Pour La Table Du Citoyen Directeur et Général

Barras, Le Décadi 30 Floréal.

Douze personnes.

1 potage. 2 plats de rôt.

1 relevé. 6 entremets.

6 entrées. 1 salade.

24 plats de dessert.

Le potage aux petits oignons à la ci-devant minime.

Le relevé, un troncon d'esturgeon à la broche.

Les Six Entrées:

1 d'un sauté de filets de turbot à l'homme de confiance, ci-devant

maître-d'hôtel.

1 d'anguilles à la tartare.

1 de concombres farcis à la moelle.

1 vol-au-vent de blanc de volaille à la Béchamel.

1 d'un ci-devant St. Pierre sauce aux câpres.

1 de filets de perdrix en anneaux.

Les Deux Plats de Rôt:

1 de goujons du département.

1 d'une carpe au court-bouillon.

Les Six Entremets:

1 d'œufs à la neige.

1 betteraves blanches sautés au jambon.

1 d'une gelée au vin de Madère.

1 de beignets de crême à la fleur d'oranger.

1 de lentilles à la ci-devant reine à la crême au blond de veau.

1 de culs d'artichauts à la ravigote.

1 salade céleri en rémoulade.

Beneath the bill of fare were these remarks, signed "Barras":

"There is too much fish. Leave out the gudgeons; the rest is

all right. Do not forget to place cushions on the chairs of

the _citoyennes_ Tallien, Talma, Beauharnais, Hainguerlot, and

Mirande. And for five o'clock precisely. Have the ices sent

from Veloni's; I don't want any others."

The first restaurant is generally said to have been established in

Paris about the middle of the eighteenth century (1765) by a cook

named Boulanger, in the rue des Poulies, with this device to herald

its purpose: _Venite omnes qui stomacho laboratis, et ego restaurato

vos_--"Come all ye that labour with the stomach, and I will restore

you." Grimod de la Reynière, however, mentions a certain Champ d'Oiseau

as the first of his calling, his establishment being in the rue des

Poulies and dating from 1770. The Marquis de Cussy, in turn, who is

also a good authority, has credited the signboard of the first Parisian

restaurant to a man named Lamy.

The motto and signboard were a conspicuous part of the olden tavern,

restaurant, and inn, as well as other shops devoted to retail trade,

and one views with regret, both on the Continent and in Great Britain,

the increasing disappearance of this picturesque feature. At one time

the signboard was obligatory on every landlord and vender of wines

and liquors, and scarce a century ago few public places that provided

for the entertainment of man and beast were without their illuminated

indices.

Among the most common in France was that of _La Truie qui file_, or the

Spinning Pig, in vogue among merchants of provisions. _A la Marmite

de Gargantua_ and _Aux Moutons de Panurge_ were favourite signs of

restaurants. The frequent _Lion d'Or_ of hotels and taverns often

represented a traveller asleep--_au lit on dort_. _Au Cheval blanc_, a

very popular title, was usually accompanied by the traditional phrase,

_Ici on loge à pied et à cheval_. The traveller who has visited the

smaller towns of France and who remembers his dinners will associate

many an excellent table d'hôte with the shield of the white charger.

_Au bon Coign_ was a sign in favour with wine-shops situated at a

corner of a street, while _Au Saint Jean-Baptiste_ was a common device

of linen-merchants. A wine-merchant opposite Père-Lachaise had these

words printed on his ensign, _Ici on est mieux qu'en face_. A not

unfrequent Parisian signboard was that of an ox dressed with bonnet,

veil, and shawl, to signify _bœuf à la mode_. A pastry-cook's

manifesto depicted a little girl climbing up to reach some cakes in

a pantry, with the title, _A la petite Gourmande_. A corset-maker's

sign was accompanied by a large corsage, with this explanation of its

office, _Je soutiens les faibles, je comprime les forts, je ramène

les égarés_. The emblem of a stocking-maker represented a grisette

trying on a new pair of hose and exhibiting her nether charms to an

admirer--with the motto, _A la belle occasion_. Among the wittiest of

old enseignes was that of a Paris boot-maker named Nicque, who had for

his device a splendid bouquet of flowers, with the inscription _Aux

Amateurs de la Botte à Nicque_. Representations of the sun and the moon

were among the oldest and most common signs both on the Continent and

in England, the sixteenth-century French poet Désiré Arthus writing in

his "Loyaulté Consciencieuse des Taverniers":

"Sur les chemins des grands villes et champs,

Ne trouverez de douze maisons l'une,

Qui n'ait enseigne d'un soleil, d'une lune.

Tous vendant vin, chascun à son quartier."

(On roads that wind through town and field,

Not one in twelve but flaunts the shield

Of sun or moon, whose beams benign

Proclaim an inn dispensing wine.)

Early in 1800 the rue Vivienne was celebrated for its numerous

artistic signs, some of which were suspended from the lintels, and

others painted on the door-posts and window-frames. These, with the

picturesque street-criers and the olden sun-dials, have gradually

become more and more a thing of the past in the French capital,

though they still add to the charm and quaintness of some of the old

provincial towns, where modern ways have been more slow to intrude.

How, of a gusty day or on the rising of the wind, the old signs creak

on their rusty hinges in the dark vaulted streets, telling of the

roysterings that have been held within--of the flashing of rapiers and

clash of swords, the draining of bumpers and clink of louis d'or!

[Illustration: THE CRIES OF PARIS: "OLD CLOTHES, OLD LACES!"

Facsimile of an old French plate]

Previous to the restaurants, the kitchens of the inns, which were

usually poor, and the tables d'hôte of some of the hotels had meagrely

provided for the wants of those who were unable to provide for

themselves in houses of their own. Towards the end of the century

the restaurant of Beauvilliers and others were flourishing, that

of Beauvilliers closing in 1793 to be reopened with less success

at the termination of the Revolution. Robert, former chef of a

_fermier-général_, the distinguished Méot and his scholars Véry, Riche,

Hardy, and Roze, were among notable masters of the time. The "Manuel

des Amphitryons" (1808) pronounced Robert the elder "the greatest cook

of the present age."

About the beginning of the century the table of the great Cambacères

was the most renowned in Paris, and M. d'Aigrefeuille was considered

the most eminent epicure. The Prince de Talleyrand was also a most

distinguished amateur, having been termed "the first fork of his

time." At the advanced age of eighty, it was his custom to spend nearly

an hour every morning with his cook, discussing the dishes which were

to compose the dinner, his only repast. It had long been one of his

tenets that a careful and healthful cuisine, presided over by the best

artist he could procure, would tend to preserve his health and forefend

serious maladies far better than a staff of physicians. For a period of

twelve years Carême was his culinary director, with carte blanche to

exercise his subtlest skill. Two things, Talleyrand used to say, are

essential in life--to give good dinners and keep well with women, a

precept he always followed. An axiom of diplomatists and statesmen goes

still farther--that poor dinners are conducive to poor diplomacy, and

bad ministerial dinners are equivalent to bad laws and bad negotiations.

The first volume of the "Almanach des Gourmands" (1804) is dedicated

to M. d'Aigrefeuille, whom the author adjudged most worthy of such

pre-eminence--"a connoisseur who is the most erudite arbiter of refined

alimentary combinations, and who understands most thoroughly the

difficult and little known art of extracting the greatest possible

part from an excellent repast." Besides referring to him as setting

daily the finest table in Paris, he is extolled as "the guest best

adapted to honour an opulent table by his delightful manners, his

profound knowledge of the world, and the constantly varied charm of his

inexhaustible appetite and conversation."

Beauvilliers, once chef of Monsieur, brother of the king, was also

the author of a cook-book which achieved marked success,[12] the

writer carrying out in cookery the precept that Délille had applied to

gardening:

"Mais ce grand art exige un artiste qui pense,

Prodigue de génie et non pas de dépense."

(But this grand art demands an artist of taste--

Prodigal of genius and devoid of all waste.)

In his fluent dedication to the Marquis de Voppalière, the writer says:

"I have not been unmindful of economy, either in the

manipulation or the preservation of foods.... I have sought

to teach how, with little outlay, one may have exquisite

viands, and at the same time derive both health and pleasure.

Good living is at once the luxury which costs the least; and

perhaps of all pleasures it is the most innocent.... You

have always held, monsieur, that Wisdom itself should strew

flowers in the midst of the thorns that are inseparable from

existence. Often at a banquet Wisdom may renew its moral

forces. The bonds of society become narrowed, and rivals or

enemies are merged into friends or guests. Persons who are

entire strangers to each other share in the intimacy of the

family, differences of rank become obliterated, weakness is

united to power, manners are polished, and the mind takes a

fresh flight (_l'esprit électrisé prend un nouvel essor_).

It is perchance in the midst of banquets in the best society

of Paris and Versailles that you have acquired that urbanity

which characterises you, that familiarity with the _grand

monde_ which is enabled to pronounce on everything at a

glance."

Every great cook should be able to say with him, "I have inaugurated

reforms, improvements, in order to advance from what is good to what is

better." Already, "l'Art du Cuisinier" draws attention to the fact that

"new dishes," to a large extent, are not new dishes--a chef supplies

some new decoration to a _plat_, adds to or leaves off some ingredient,

and christens it with a different name.

The treatise of Beauvilliers has been pronounced by authorities one of

the best on the subject. The style is direct, his menu varied and yet

not over-ornate, and his formularies, founded on long experience, even

yet denote a superior hand. There can be comparatively little trouble

in following many of his recipes, they are so precise--save some of

his sauces and certain grand dishes, these calling for preparatory

_Espagnoles_, _veloutés_, _Béchamels_, and _Allemandes_, and a larder

beyond the reach of the ordinary cook. There are numerous dishes, of

course, that one may not procure at home, however deft the presiding

genius. One cannot have a constant stock of elaborate preparatory

sauces, truffles, cockscombs, Chablis, or champagne to draw from for a

single dish, when desired, without very considerable outlay or waste. A

grand sauce, a salmon _à la Chambord_, or an elaborate entrée requires

the appurtenances of a restaurant or a club where cookery is conducted

on an extensive scale by a professional, though this by no means

implies that a dinner beyond criticism may not be served at one's own

home.

Early in the nineteenth century Berchoux published his "Gastronomie,"

and Grimod de la Reynière appeared as the versatile author of the

"Almanach des Gourmands." By this time cookery was fully able to take

care of itself, irrespective of royalty or titled patrons, and the

"Almanach" became its greatest oracle and promoter.

Before referring to the "Almanach," which claims a chapter by itself, a

word should be said of Berchoux's poetical treatise, the first edition

of which appeared in 1801. Recalling Gentil Bernard's "l'Art d'Aimer"

in its scope and spirit, this tribute to the tenth muse has been termed

one of the most ingenious productions of light French poetry. Free from

the grossness that characterises so many French works on the subject,

it touches lightly, comprehensively, and entertainingly upon the

theme. It was soon translated into numerous languages, and many of its

precepts have become proverbial. The advice throughout is excellent,

but, as it was observed to the author at the time, "You are all alike,

messieurs the poets, you say admirable things; but it is impossible to

carry them out."

After passing in review the table of the ancients, and censuring their

intemperance and gluttony, the author advises the reader who would live

contentedly to choose his residence in Auvergne or La Bresse, under

whose favourable skies he may procure everything that ministers to the

pleasures of the table:

"Voulez-vous réussir dans l'art que je professe?

Ayez un bon château dans l'Auvergne ou La Bresse,

Ou près des lieux charmants d'où Lyon voit passer

Deux fleuves amoureux tout prêts à s'embrasser.

Vous vous procurerez, sous ce ciel favorable,

Tout ce qui peut servir aux douceurs de la table."

A good cook at once becomes the great desideratum--an artist whom

one may bless after having partaken of the courses he has served, an

officer who will cause one's table to be envied by all who have shared

its good cheer, a seneschal of grave mien and imposing presence,

conscientious in his work, prolific in resources, and proud of his

art,--

"... qui d'un air important,

Auprès de son fourneau que la flamme illumine,

Donne avec dignité des lois dans sa cuisine."

The interior of the kitchen while the dinner is being prepared is next

portrayed with the skill of an Ostade. The charcoal glows, the spits

turn merrily, the lustrous copper of the saucepans and kettles catches

the ruddy light of the flames. The gravies simmer, and the fowls take

on a golden hue. All is excitement, but an excitement tempered by

perfect order and harmony. In the midst, surrounded by his subalterns,

to whom he issues his commands, stands the chef--impassible, majestic,

serene--like a general on the eve of a decisive battle:

"Tel on voit, au moment d'une sanglante affaire,

Un prudent général mesurer la carrière.

Son courage tranquille et sa noble fierté

Commandent l'espérance et la sécurité.

La foule l'environne et presse son armure,

D'un trouble involontaire il entend le murmure;

Peut-être un peu d'effroi s'est glissé dans son sein,

Mais son visage est calme, et son front serein."

The pictures he has drawn of the dinner and its service, and his

counsels regarding moderation and sobriety, are equally felicitous.

Though he himself was no Sybarite, but, like Savarin, was only a

gourmand when he had his pen in hand, he is none the less severe on the

dietarians:

"En se privant de tout, ils pensent se guérir,

Et se donnent la mort par la peur de mourir."

Nor has he failed to extol the virtues of exercise, that most potent

abettor of health and aid to enjoyment:

"D'un noble appétit munissez-vous d'avance,

Sans lui vous gémirez au sein de l'abondance;

II est un moyen sûr d'acquérir ce tresor:

L'exercise, messieurs, et l'exercise encore:

Allez tous les matins sur les pas de Diane,

Armés d'un long fusil ou d'une sarbacane,

Epier le canard au bord de vos marais;

Allez lancer la biche au milieu des forêts;

Poursuivez le chevreuil s'élançant dans la plaine;

Suivez vos chiens ardents que leur courage entraîne.

Partagez sans rougir de champêtres travaux,

Et ne dédaignez pas ou la bêche ou la faux."

It were in vain to look for a better dining-room motto than his precept:

"Rien ne doit déranger l'honnête homme qui dîne;"[13]

or his hygienic maxim:

"Jouissez lentement, et que rien ne vous presse."

Like good wine, his canto has not lost its fragrance through age, and

those who read it will almost be inclined to doubt the truth of the

concluding line:

"Un poème ne valut jamais un dîner--"

unless it be a _dîner sans façon_, which he has not failed to condemn.

Of other tributes in verse to gastronomy, Colnet's "l'Art de Dîner

en Ville"[14] is the next important, but this is by no means to be

compared with the canto of Berchoux. And though the language abounds in

minor poems on the subject, few of these may be considered seriously,

while nearly all offend by their grossness or their halting measures.

Napoleon Bonaparte was not an epicure, though he enjoined upon all

the great functionaries of the empire to set a good table. He was in

constant dread of growing obese as he became old, was proverbially

irregular in his hours of eating, and rushed his food as he would a

battalion on the battle-field. His repasts concerned him little so

long as they were served the instant his appetite craved, and were

accompanied by his favourite Chambertin.

The Pleasures of the Table An Account of Gastronomy from Ancient Days to Present Times. With a History of Its Literature, Schools, and Most Distinguished Artists; Together With Some Special Recipes, and Views Concerning the Aesthetics of Dinners and Dinner-giving · 第 4 / 31 段