L. E. W.

We are continually obtaining new and piercing glimpses into human life

and character. We are now able to assert, without fear of rebuttal,

that even men of unblemished intellect and lofty, serene understanding

have always some particular point of frailty at which morals, virtue,

and integrity collapse in a dark confusion of spiritual wreckage.

Reconsidering the above sentence it seems to need a little

clarification. We shall have to explain what we mean, and can only do

so by referring, with painful verity, to the Leading Editorial Writer.

L. E. W. came into our kennel yesterday morning and saw lying on our

desk a newly published detective novel that a publisher had sent us.

“Oh,” he said, “What’s this?” and began looking it over. We were rather

busy at the moment, and paid no particular heed, but looked up a

minute later to see him slipping out of our hutch with the book under

his arm.

“Here!” we cried, “what are you doing with that book?”

“I’m going to read it,” he said, with bland composure.

“Nothing doing,” we asserted sternly. “We began to read that in the

subway this morning, and we’re just getting interested in it. You’ll

have to wait until we’ve finished it.”

“But you can’t read it in the office,” he said; “you’re too busy.”

“So are you,” we replied; “but we’re going to read it to-night; after

an exhausting day we shall need an innocent diversion of that sort.”

We did not think of it at the time, but we now remember that there was

a curious evasive lustre in his eye. We wish we could make it plain

to you how this person, generally a highly cultivated and responsible

citizen, occasionally exhibits himself as naïvely unscrupulous, in a

way so charming and unashamed that, with lesser men than ourself, he

successfully gets away with it.

A little later in the day, again comes L. E. W. into our nook. He

looks about in an absent-minded way, giving much the appearance of the

_animula vagula blandula_ the Roman emperor told about. He made one or

two random remarks, and seemed to be pretending that he had intended

to say something important but had forgotten what it was. We may say

that we penetrated his game immediately. We kept an eye on him, and as

soon as he had retired we took the detective story and put several

newspapers on top of it.

But after all, one cannot sit around the office all day watching the

book one is saving for evening reading. By and by we had to go out to

lunch, and thought no more of the matter until 5 o’clock. Then, hastily

gathering our effects for the trek uptown, we looked for the novel. It

was gone.

We could not quite believe it, at first. We thought we must have

mislaid it somewhere on top of our desk. We rummaged briskly. No sign

of it. With a sudden vile suspicion we ran to L. E. W.’s room. He was

gone, too.

Well, we had to console ourself on the ride uptown by reading something

else; but you know how it is--when you have set your heart on finishing

a particular story....

This morning L. E. W. has just come into our coop, with his usual

enigmatic smile, and laid the book before us. We assailed him with

bitter reproach and contumely. But we made no impression on him. There

is some mysterious knot of villainy in his bosom that leads him to

believe that any detective story left within his reach.... Of course it

is true that writing Leading Editorials for a number of years may well

undermine a man’s character. But that is what we mean when we say that

even men of unblemished intellect and lofty, serene understanding have

always some particular point of frailty at which morals, virtue, and

integrity collapse in a dark confusion of spiritual wreckage.

We haven’t mentioned the title of the book, because L. E. W. says it

isn’t much good. But we are not certain whether that is not just his

quaint way of trying to minify the gruesomeness of his offence. It is a

perverted form of conscience: he thinks that if he tells us the book is

punk we will not regret that our reading was brutally postponed. But we

are going to tell him that he missed a trick there. It would have been

much more in line with the delightful humour for which he is famous if

he had said: “It’s a great yarn. You ought to read it.”

[Illustration]

The Powder of Sympathy · 第 67 / 171 题