_Answer._—Samuel Adams was one of the very first who organized

measures of resistance against the encroachments of Great Britain on

the rights of the colonies. He drew up the famous petition of the

General Court of Boston to the King, in 1764, against taxation on

trade. He was elected a Representative in the Massachusetts House of

Representatives in 1765, was chosen Clerk, and served in that body

ten years. It is said that he was the first to suggest the congress

of colonial delegates that assembled in New York in 1765, and was

the father of the non-importation agreement of 1789, intended to

check the use of British manufactures and other foreign imports and

foster home manufactures and, still more, a spirit of independence.

He was Chairman of the committee that waited on the Royal Governor

and Council in 1770, on the day after the Boston riot and massacre,

and demanded the removal of the troops. He was one of the signers

of the declaration of independence: was one of those who matured

the plan of the Continental Congress, to which he was a delegate

from Massachusetts from 1774 to 1782, and signed the articles of

confederation, which were the constitution of the country until

replaced by the present Federal Constitution. He was Lieutenant

Governor of Massachusetts from 1789 to 1794, and Governor from 1794

to 1797. He was born in Boston Sept. 27, 1722, graduated at Harvard

in 1740, and died in Boston Oct. 2, 1803.

ORIGIN OF THE CAUCUS.

CHICAGO, Ill.

Can you tell us the origin of the American caucus?

JOHN ALLEN.

_Answer._—The origin of the term “caucus” is traced back to the

Caucus Club, Boston, of revolutionary days. This club was composed

mainly of persons engaged in ship-building. It was one of the most

radical opponents of British oppression. It and the Merchants’ Club

of the same period, used to meet before elections and agree on

candidates for town and provincial offices. “Caucus” is believed to

be a corruption of “caulkers.”

THE YORK SHILLING.

CHICAGO, Ill.

To settle a dispute please inform us through Our Curiosity Shop

whether the United States ever issued a coin called the “York

shilling?” Was there not a coin of some kind called a York shilling?

READER.

_Answer._—The United States certainly never did mint any such coin.

Neither did New York itself before the adoption of our present

Constitution, under which individual States are not permitted to

coin money. Most of the original thirteen States had issued bills of

credit during colonial times, which had depreciated in the several

colonies in different degrees, according to provisions made for their

redemption and other incidents. In New England, after the adoption

of the Federal decimal system, the pound in paper currency was worth

only $3.33⅓ and the shilling 16⅔ cents, equal to six shillings to

the dollar. This standard prevailed also in Virginia, Kentucky,

Tennessee, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Mississippi, Alabama, and

Florida. In New York the paper currency pound was worth only $2.50,

and so the shilling was reckoned but 12½ cents, equal to eight

shillings to the dollar. This last is the “York shilling,” a money of

account. The only coin that ever passed by that name is the Spanish

real, known along the Ohio and Lower Mississippi as “a bit,” which,

until a few years ago, was current through the country at 12½ cents,

the value, as above shown, of the New York paper currency shilling of

the olden times. In Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland

the pound was worth $2.70, making the shilling worth 13½ cents, or

7s. 6d. to the $1. In Georgia and South Carolina the pound was worth

$4.20, and the shilling 21-3/7 cents, or 4s. 8d. to the dollar. Such

was the force of habit that, long after the old colonial paper money

passed out of use, people continued to buy and sell and keep accounts

in pounds and shillings; and schoolboys were required to familiarize

themselves with the rules for reducing the several State currencies

to Federal currency.

THE GREAT NAPOLEON’S DEFEATS.

CHICAGO, Ill.

1. Was Bonaparte repulsed at Acre? 2. Was he forced to leave Egypt?

3. Did he make a disastrous retreat from Moscow? 4. Did the Duke

of Wellington suffer defeats parallel to those endured by Napoleon

Bonaparte?

THOMAS WILSON.

_Answer._—1. In 1799, after laying siege to the stronghold of Acre,

Syria, for sixty-one days, Napoleon Bonaparte resolved to raise

the siege and return to Egypt, where his presence was demanded by

the threatening state of affairs, which culminated at last in the

great battle of Aboukir, in which he defeated Murad Bey, for the

second time, with great slaughter. There is no doubt that, although

victorious over the Ottoman and Egyptian armies, the almost utter

annihilation of the French fleet by the English and Turks in the

famous naval battle of the Nile, some months before this, and the

menacing state of affairs in France, made it prudent for Napoleon

to take advantage of the prestige of this victory to retire from

Egypt, leaving the government of the country he had conquered to

General Kleber, who soon after this totally defeated the Ottoman

army, 70,000 strong, before Heliopolis. Not until after Kleber

was assassinated and months of the unwise administration of his

successor, General Menou, did the insurrection fomented by the

English, and finally assisted by an English naval and land force,

compel the French under Menou, to withdraw from Egypt, nearly two

years after Bonaparte himself had returned to France. Taken all in

all the French expedition into Egypt, planned by Napoleon Bonaparte,

although distinguished by several brilliant exploits, must be

regarded from a political and military standpoint as a failure. 3. So

was the expedition to Moscow, which, after a succession of victories,

ended in a disastrous retreat in midwinter, forced upon the French,

not by arms, but by threatening starvation and other results of the

burning of Moscow. 4. The Duke of Wellington, although several times

compelled to retreat before French armies during campaigns in the

Netherlands and in Spain, never suffered any disasters comparable

with those inflicted on Napoleon; neither did he ever exhibit, even

at Waterloo, where, with the allies, he had double the strength

of the French army, such marvelous generalship as made Napoleon

Bonaparte for many years more than a match for all the powers of

Europe combined, the arbiter of all their thrones.

FUNDED AND FLOATING DEBT DEFINED.

IROQUOIS, D. T.

Explain the terms “floating debt,” “funded debt,” and “sinking

fund.”

QUERIST.

_Answer._.—“Funded debt” is government or corporation indebtedness in

the form of bonds or other evidences of money stipulated to be paid

at stated intervals, and usually bearing interest payable annually or

oftener. “Floating debt” is indebtedness, such as unsettled accounts,

scrip in the nature of due bills, etc. not funded. A sinking fund

is money set apart out of taxes, earnings, or other income, for the

redemption of government or corporation bonds or other specific

tokens of indebtedness.

ARTIFICIAL INCUBATION.

FAYETTE, Iowa.

I am very anxious to learn how to make an incubator, or have one

made, for hatching chickens by artificial means. Will you oblige

myself and other readers by giving such minute directions that a

carpenter can make one by following them?

E. J. ALLCOTT.

_Answer._.—Similar requests are made by C. A. Brace, Esq., of

Persia, Iowa; L. R. S., Cameron, Neb.; Q., of Elk Grove, Wis.,

and several others, some of whom desire to know what success has

attended experiments in artificial incubation with modern apparatus.

Conflicting reports as to this latter question, together with the

fraudulent methods taken by some persons engaged in vending pamphlets

that cost the publishers not to exceed 8 cents a copy, containing

directions for making apparatus of this sort, at the extortionate

price of $2, and selling ready-made incubators at exorbitant prices,

has made caution advisable in treating this subject. Reports received

within the past six weeks from twenty different persons, who have

experimented with incubators, indicate that in about twelve cases

out of twenty the average success is encouraging, and in the cases

of the others the average results are quite discouraging. It is very

certain that in a climate incident to such sudden and extreme changes

as ours success demands skill and constant attention. None but

absolutely fresh eggs must be selected, a temperature hardly varying

from 103 deg., and a proper degree of moisture must be maintained,

with sleepless vigilance. Let the eggs be chilled even for a few

minutes and the consequences are disastrous. For a comparatively

inexpensive incubator make a box 4 feet long, 3 feet wide, 6 inches

deep, outside measurement, with a tight board lid and a zinc bottom;

using boards 1¼ inches thick, nailed or screwed together. This is

the heater. Of the same kind of boards make an egg-drawer 4 feet

long, 2 feet 11½ inches wide, 5 inches high, outside measure, and 4

inches deep on the inside, with slats nailed in crosswise, instead

of a board for the bottom. The slats better be of inch-thick lumber,

not more than 1 inch wide, and set one inch apart. Over these slats

on the inside tack a piece of coarse sack the full length and width

of the box. Draw it tight and tack it securely to the slats and the

ends of the box. Next make a frame 3 feet 7 inches long and 32 inches

wide, using inch-square strips for the end pieces and inch-wide

strips of half-inch thickness for the sides. Strain stout muslin over

this frame and tack it firmly. Lay this, muslin side down, on the

coarse cloth in the egg drawer. This is to support the eggs. Next

bore twenty half-inch holes in each side of the egg drawer, 1¾ inches

apart, and as close to the frame with the muslin bottom as can be

done and yet allow this frame to slide easily underneath twenty slats

a half-inch square each, which must be run through the box from hole

to hole, to keep the eggs in position. Arrange the eggs between these

slats, resting on the muslin of the muslin frame. It will be seen

that by moving this frame about two inches backward or forward the

eggs can be turned half over. Make a box of precisely the same length

and breadth as the heater, but eight inches deep instead of six.

Nail on a tight bottom of inch flooring stuff; bore twelve half-inch

holes in this bottom, into which insert as many tin tubes of the same

diameter, seven inches long, for ventilators. Fill all the space

between the pipes with sawdust to within about an inch of their tops.

Next set the egg drawer on top of this ventilator box, and set the

heater, the first box described, on the top of the egg drawer. Take

common inch-boards, one foot wide, and nail one on each side and

across one end of this pile of boxes, driving the nails along the

lower edge of each board into the ventilator box, and along the upper

edge into the heater box; raising the latter off of the egg-drawer

barely enough to let the latter slide easily back and forth between

the heater and ventilator.

As the incubator stands now, the egg-drawer is protected from the

cold, underneath, by the ventilator box with about six inches of

sawdust: but it must be similarly protected on the sides and top.

Set this nest of boxes, as now arranged, on a couple of trestles

made of pieces of scantling, four feet eight or ten inches long,

with short legs eight inches long, and build another box 27 inches

high (outside) around them, long enough and wide enough to form a

sawdust chamber 8 inches wide along both sides and the back end of

the incubator, and rising 8 inches higher than the top of the heater.

Next get two tin pipes, 12 or 13 inches long and about 2½ inches in

diameter, seamed together, as solder melts; also get two such pipes

about 6 inches long, and two elbows. Bore a 2½-inch hole through the

sawdust-box and the heater-box entering the latter about 9 inches

from the front and 2 inches below the lid, and slide one of the

longer pipes through these holes. Attach one of the elbows and one

of the 6-inch pipes outside. Put the other pipe into the heater from

the opposite side, about 9 inches from the back end of the heater.

Two kerosene lamps, set on brackets, on the outside of the sawdust

box, with their chimneys thrust up into the short pipes, will supply

all the heat that is required for hatching the eggs. If the lamps

smoke, drop them low enough to admit a little air to enter between

the chimneys and the inside of the pipes. Opposite where each of

these tin flues enters the heater, bore three three-quarter-inch

holes through the top of the heater, nine or ten inches apart, in a

line about three inches from the side. Slide six tin tubes of the

same diameter, fifteen or sixteen inches long, through these holes

to within a half-inch of the zinc bottom of the heater. Now fill

the sawdust chamber around the incubator and on top, putting earth

instead of sawdust just around the hot-air flues, to avoid fire. As

the zinc directly under where the hot-air flues enter the heater is

apt to get overheated, it is best before covering the heater with

sawdust to lay a piece of zinc or tin, about a foot square, on the

zinc bottom as an equalizer of the temperature. Keep a thermometer in

the egg drawer to test the temperature. This drawer will hold about

250 eggs.

This is the incubator; directions for using it will be given

hereafter.

M. A. Bevard, Derby, Iowa—General Hull took part in the revolutionary

battles of White Plains, Trenton, Stillwater, Princeton, Saratoga,

and Monmouth. 2. Aaron Burr died on Staten Island.

INTEREST ON NOTES.

WASHBURN, Wis.

1. Will a promissory note draw interest if it is not so specified

in the note? 2. Will a note made payable one year after date, with

interest at 7 per cent, draw interest after the note becomes due?

A. E. R.

_Answer._.—1. Such a note will not draw interest until after due and

payment has been demanded. It will draw legal interest from date of

such demand. 2. Such a note will continue to draw interest at the

same rate if payment is demanded at maturity and payment is withheld.

NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COMMISSION.

BARNARD, Ill.

Who was the first to propose Castle Garden for the benefit of

foreign immigrants? Is the board of management a National or a

State organization? How did it originate?

ANNA SIERLE.

_Answer._—The pitiable condition in which immigrants were landed

in New York, the cruelties inflicted upon them in many cases in

overcrowded emigrant ships, the extortions and downright frauds

practiced upon them when they were put ashore like so many cattle,

and left to shift for themselves in a strange city, without language

to make their wants known, began to attract the attention of humane

public officers and merchants of that city at an early day. The

outrages multiplied, and the importance of providing some remedy

grew with the rapid increase of foreign immigration, which swelled

from 22,633 for the whole United States in 1831, to 104,565 in 1842.

The Legislature of New York State was appealed to, and on May 5,

1847—in which year the rate of foreign immigration more than doubled

upon that of 1842, the total number received rising to 234,968—it

created the present Board of Commissioners of Emigration of the

State of New York, which has been in successful operation ever

since, and has proved one of the most beneficent institutions of the

land. It consists of nine members, six of whom are appointed by the

Governor with consent of the Senate, while the other three are the

Mayor of the city and the Presidents of the German Society and the

Irish Emigration Society. All of these serve without compensation.

The law makes it their duty to provide suitable quarters for the

reception of alien passengers arriving at New York; to care for the

sick and helpless among them; to protect them from extortion, fraud,

and impositions of any kind; to aid those who wish transfer to the

railways and other transportation routes to the interior of the

country; to assist such as wish to remain in the city to obtain work,

and, in general, to give them trustworthy information and advice,

and guard their interests. For this purpose they were authorized to

collect of vessel owners $2.50 for each passenger, until 1871, when

it was reduced to $1.50.

In 1855 the city of New York leased Castle Garden to the

Commissioners for an immigrant landing depot, and it was opened for

this purpose in August of that year. It occupies the extreme southern

point of the city at the junction of the North River, or Hudson, with

the East River. A more convenient, healthy, an every way desirable

station could not have been selected. The immigrants are brought here

directly from immigrant vessels, in tugs or barges, and received into

rooms properly heated, lighted, and ventilated. Bath-rooms, lunch

counters, with provisions at reasonable prices, suitable sleeping

quarters, and other conveniences are all found within the building,

and are conducted under strict superintendence. The names of such as

have money, letters, or friends awaiting them are called out. Clerks

stand ready to write letters for them in any European language.

There are railway offices where tickets are sold them by thoroughly

responsible clerks, who can talk with them in their native tongues.

Responsible brokers exchange their foreign coin and currency at par

market value. There is an employment bureau to find work for those

who do not care to go any farther. A physician is in attendance, and

the sick are properly cared for in a temporary hospital until they

are transported to the immigrant hospitals on Ward’s Island.

In view of the fact that about two-thirds of all the foreign

immigration to the United States land at New York, it is, indeed,

a noble institution that meets these strangers with such generous

provisions for their wants. According to an article in “The American

Cyclopedia,” of the 5,033,392 immigrants arriving at New York between

May 5, 1847, and Jan. 1, 1873, for whom commutation money was paid

by the vessel-owners, “all of whom received protection, advice,

and information from the commissions, 1,465,579 were provided and

cared for out of the immigrant fund, for a greater or less period

during the five years subsequent to their arrival; 398,643 received

treatment and care in the institutions of the commissioners; 449,275

were temporarily supplied with board and lodging and money relief in

the city of New York; 349,936 were provided with employment through

the labor bureau at Castle Garden; 53,083 were forwarded from Castle

Garden to their destination in the United States, or returned to

Europe at their own request; and 214,642 were relieved and provided

for in various parts of the State of New York,” all out of this

immigrant fund. In 1872-3 bills were introduced into Congress to

supersede this New York Emigration Commission by a National bureau,

but the movement excited great opposition, not only in New York, but

in other quarters, and it ended in failure.

DERIVATION OF SIRLOIN.

GALENA, Ill.

Is it true that an English king knighted a roast of beef as Sir

Loin, and that this was the origin of the name sirloin for a

certain cut of meat?

A SUBSCRIBER.

_Answer._—It is true that the great lexicographer, Dr. Johnson,

gave credence and currency to this etymological nonsense, and that

subsequent lexicographers, down to Webster and Worcester, parrot-like

repeated it. But both of our distinguished lexicographers rejected

this popular tradition of a silly freak or pun of James I. or

Charles II. as of no etymological value, and agree that sirloin,

which appears in Johnson’s dictionary for the first time with this

orthography, is derived from the French surlonge, that is, “upper

loin.” In the old English dictionaries, such as Ainsworth’s and

Cotgrave’s, the English word was spelled surloin, and both Webster

and Worcester, while giving sirloin as the usual orthography,

recommend surloin, and authorize it as the preferable spelling.

Skeats’ Etymological Dictionary, Oxford, 1882, vocabulates this word

thus: “Sirloin, an inferior spelling of surloin, q. v.;” and under

surloin says: “Frequently spelled sirloin, owing to a fable that

the loin of beef was knighted by one of our kings in a fit of good

humor.” The king was naturally imagined to be the merry monarch

Charles II., though Richardson says (on no authority) that it was so

entitled by King James I. Both stories are discredited by the use

of the original French surlonge in the fourteenth century. Indeed,

Wedgewood actually cites ‘a surloyn of beef’ from an account of

expenses of Henry VI. But Richardson had the authority of Dean Swift

for referring the pun on surloin to James I. In “Polite Conversation”

Swift says: “But, pray, why is it called a sirloin? Why, you must

know that our King James I., who loved good eating, being invited

to dinner by one of his nobles, and seeing a large loin of beef at

his table, he drew out his sword and in a frolic knighted it.” Which

Swift, in all probability, intended to be taken as a legend, and

nothing more.

NORTH CAROLINA GOLD MINES.

Give us some information in regard to the extent of mining for the

precious metals in North Carolina.

MALCOLM MCMANUS.

_Answer._—There was a time when gold mining in North Carolina was an

important industry. The earliest record at the United States mint of

gold produced in this country was in 1804. In that year a deposit

was made at the mint of gold found in North Carolina. Small amounts,

not exceeding an annual average of $2,500, were received from 1804

to 1823, after which there was a steady increase, as follows: In

1824, total amount received at mint, $5,000; in 1825, $17,000; in

1826, $20,000; in 1827, $21,000; in 1828, $46,000; in 1829, $134,000.

During this last year $2,500 was received from Virginia and $3,500

from South Carolina. A Southern “gold fever” set in, and hundreds of

people went to prospecting all along the Appalachian Mountains, so

that in the next year, 1830, the mint received $212,000 from Georgia,

$204,000 from North Carolina, $26,000 from South Carolina, $24,000

from Virginia, and $2,000 from Tennessee and Alabama. The total

amounts of precious metals from the mines of the South, deposited at

the United States mint from 1804 to 1881, was as follows:

From Virginia $ 1,689,797.00

From North Carolina 10,750,468.64

From South Carolina 1,429,751.55

From Georgia 7,869,282.60

From Alabama 220,892.25

From Tennessee 86,511.61

——————————————

Total $22,046,703.65

Various causes conduced to the decrease of mining in the South

before the discovery of gold in California, but this latter event

drew away the best miners and most experienced, most enterprising

capitalists engaged in the business, so that the gold product of this

region became insignificant. A revival of mining has set in in North

Carolina, yet the products of the Carolinas and Georgia in 1881 was

only about $275,000.

MEERSCHAUM—SEA FOAM.

GILMAN, Ill.

Is meerschaum a product of sea foam, as some persons declare?

W. C. DUCKHAM.

_Answer._—Meerschaum is a German word, compounded from _meer_,

sea, and _schaum_, foam. It is the name of a fine clay composed of

magnesia, silica, and water in equal parts. When fresh from the pit

it is soft and makes a lather like soap, which gave rise to its

name. After being molded into pipes, these are boiled in oil or wax

and baked until hard.

STATE GOVERNORS.

ZANESVILLE, Ohio.

Please give the names and politics of all State and Territorial

Governors. Also, their salaries and dates of expiration of their

terms.

A SUBSCRIBER.

_Answer._—The following is a full list of Governors of the several

States and Territories, with their salaries and the times when their

terms end. The politics of Governors is indicated by running the

names of Republicans in Roman, and of Democrats and Fusionists in

italics:

The inter ocean curiosity shop for the year 1883 · 第 12 / 47 段