Chapter IV.

We shall not be curious in the ranking of the duties in which Christian

love should exercise itself. All the commandments of the second table are

but branches of it: they might be reduced all to the works of

righteousness and of mercy. But truly these are interwoven through other.

Though mercy uses to be restricted to the showing of compassion upon men

in misery, yet there is a righteousness in that mercy, and there is mercy

in the most part of the acts of righteousness, as in not judging rashly,

in forgiving, &c. Therefore we shall consider the most eminent and

difficult duties of love, which the word of God solemnly and frequently

charges upon us in relation to others, especially these of the household

of faith.

I conceive we would labour to enforce upon our hearts, and persuade our

souls to a love of all men, by often ruminating upon the words of the

Apostle, which enjoin us to “abound in love towards all men,” 1 Thess.

iii. 12. And this is so concerning, that he prays earnestly that the Lord

would make them increase in it, and this we should pray for too. An

affectionate disposition towards our common nature is not a common thing.

Christianity enjoins it, and it is only true humanity, Luke vi. 36, 37.

“Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful. Judge not, and

ye shall not be judged, condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned,

forgive, and ye shall be forgiven.” Now in relation to all men, charity

hath an engagement upon it to pray for all sorts of men, from that

Apostolic command, 1 Tim ii. 1: “I exhort therefore, that first of all,

supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for

all men.” Prayers and supplications, earnest prayers out of affection,

should be poured out even for them that cannot, or do not pray for

themselves. Wherefore are we taught to pray, but that we may be the mouth

of others? And since an intercessor is given to us above, how are we bound

to be intercessors for others below, and so to be affected with the common

mercies of the multitude, as to give thanks too! If man, by the law of

creation, is the mouth of the stones, trees, birds, beasts, of heaven and

earth, sun and moon and stars, how much more ought a Christian, a redeemed

man, be the mouth of mankind to praise God for the abounding of his

goodness, even towards these who are left yet in that misery and bondage

that he is delivered from?

_Next_, Charity by all means will avoid scandal, and live honestly in the

sight of all men. The apostle says, “Give none offence, neither to the

Jews nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God,” 1 Cor. x. 32. And he

adds his own example, “Even as I please all men in all things, not seeking

my own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved,” ver. 33.

Charity is not self addicted. It hath no humour to please. It can

displease itself to profit others. I do verily think there is no point of

Christianity less regarded. Others we acknowledge, but we fail in

practice. This scarce hath the approbation of the mind. Few do conceive an

obligation lying on them to it. But O how is Christianity, the most of it,

humanity? Christ makes us men as well as Christians. He makes us

reasonable men when believers. Sin transformed our nature into a wild,

beastly, viperous, selfish thing. Grace restores reason and natural

affection in the purest and highest strain. And this is reason and

humanity, elevated and purified,—to condescend to all men in all things

for their profit and edification, to deny itself to save others.

Whatsoever is not necessary in itself, we ought not to impose a necessity

upon it by our imagination and fancy, to the prejudice of a greater

necessity, another’s edification. Indeed charity will not, dare not sin to

please men. That were to hate God, to hate ourselves, and to hate our

brethren, under a base pretended notion of love. But I believe,

addictedness to our own humours in things not necessary, which have no

worth but from our disposition, doth oftener transport us beyond the

bounds of charity than the apprehension of duty and conscience of sin.

Some will grant they should be tender of offending the saints. But they do

not conceive it is much matter what they do in relation to others, as if

it were lawful to murder a Gentile more than a Christian. That is a bloody

imagination, opposite to that innocent Christian, Paul, who says (Philip.

ii. 15.), we should be “blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without

rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation,” among whom we

should shine “as lights.” And truly it is humanity elevated by

Christianity, or reason purified by religion, that is the light that

shines most brightly in this dark world. And he says (in Col. iv. 5.),

“Walk in wisdom toward them that are without,” and (1 Thess. iv. 12.)

“walk honestly toward them that are without,”—avoiding all things, in our

profession and carriage, which may alienate them from the love of the

truth and godliness walking so, as we may insinuate into their hearts some

apprehension of the beauty of religion. Many conceive, if they do good,

all is well—if it be a duty, it matters nothing. But remember that

caution, “Let not then your good be evil spoken of,” Rom. xiv. 16. We

would have our eyes upon that too, so to circumstantiate all our duties,

as they may have least offence in them, and be exposed to least obloquy of

men, 1 Pet. ii. 12. “Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles,

that whereas they speak against you as evil doers, they may by your good

works which they shall behold, glorify God in the day of visitation.”

Then, _Thirdly_, Charity follows peace with all men, as much as is

possible, Heb. xii. 14. “If it be possible as much as lieth in you, live

peaceably with all men,” Rom. xii. 18. Many spirits are framed for

contention. If peace follow them, they will flee from it. But a

Christian having made peace with God, the sweet fruit of that upon his

spirit is to dispose him to a peaceable and quiet condescendency to

others, and if peace flee from him, to follow after it, not only to

entertain it when it is offered, but to seek it when it is away, and to

pursue it when it runs away. (Psal. xxxiv. 14, which Peter urges upon

Christians, 1 Pet. iii. 8, 9, 10, 11.) “Finally, be ye all of one mind,

having compassion one of another, love as brethren, be pitiful, be

courteous. Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing, but

contrariwise, blessing, knowing that ye are thereunto called that ye

should inherit a blessing. For he that will love life, and see good days,

let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no

guile. Let him eschew evil, and do good; let him seek peace, and ensue

it.” I think, since we obtained the mercy to get a Peace maker between us

and God, we should henceforth count ourselves bound to be peace makers

among men. And truly such have a blessing pronounced upon them, Matt. v.

9. “Blessed are the peace makers.” The Prince of peace pronounced it, and

this is the blessedness, “they shall be called the children of God,”

because he is “the God of peace,” and to resemble him in these, first in

purity, then in peace, is a character of his image. It is true, peace will

sometimes flee so fast, and so far away, as a Christian cannot follow it

without sin, and that is breach of a higher peace. But charity, when it

cannot live in peace without, doth then live in peace within, because it

hath that sweet testimony of conscience, that, as far as did lie in it,

peace was followed without. Divine wisdom (James iii. 17.), “is first

pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and

good fruits, without wrangling and without hypocrisy.” If wisdom be

peaceable and not pure, it is but a carnal conspiracy in iniquity, earthly

and sensual. But if it be pure it must be peaceable. For the wisdom

descending from above hath a purity of truth, and a purity of love, and a

purity of the mind and of the affection too. Where there is a purity of

truth, but accompanied with envying, bitter strife, rigid judging,

wrangling, and such like, then it is defiled and corrupted by the

intermixture of vile and base affections, ascending out of the dunghill of

the flesh. The vapours of our lusts arising up to the mind, do stain pure

truth. They put an earthly, sensual, and devilish visage on it.

Charity, its conversation and discourse, is without judging, without

censuring, Matth. vii. 1. Of which chapter, because it contains much

edification, I shall speak more hereafter. James iii. 17. “Without

partiality, without hypocrisy.” The words in the original are, αδιακριτος

και ανυποκριτος, (without judging and wrangling, and without hypocrisy),

importing, that great censurers are often the greatest hypocrites, and

sincerity has always much charity. Truly, there is much idle time spent

this way in discourses of one another, and venting our judgments of

others, as if it were enough of commendation for us to condemn others, and

much piety to charge another with impiety. We should even be sparing in

judging them that are without, 1 Cor. v. 12, 13. Reflecting upon them or

their ways, hath more provocation than edification in it. A censorious

humour is certainly most partial to itself, and self indulgent. It can

sooner endure a great beam in its own eye, than a little mote in its

neighbour’s, and this shows evidently that it is not the hatred of sin, or

the love of virtue, which is the single and simple principle of it, but

self love, shrouded under the vail of displeasure at sin, and delight in

virtue. I would think one great help to amend this, were to abate much

from the superfluity and multitude of discourses upon others. “In the

multitude of words there wants not sin,” and in the multitude of

discourses upon other men, there cannot miss the sin of rash judging. I

find the saints and fearers of God commended for speaking often one to

another, but not at all for speaking one of another. The subject of their

discourse (Mal. iii. 16.) certainly was of another strain,—how good it was

to serve the Lord, &c.—opposite to the evil communication of others there

registered.

Charity is no tale bearer. It goeth not about as a slander to reveal a

secret, though true, Prov. xx. 19. It is of a faithful spirit to conceal

the matter, Prov. xi. 13. Another man’s good name is as a pledge laid down

in our hand, which every man should faithfully restore, and take heed how

he lose it, or alienate it by back-biting. Some would have nothing to say,

if they had not other’s faults and frailties to declaim upon, but it were

better that such kept always silent, that either they had no ears to hear

of them or know them, or had no tongues to vent them. If they do not lie

grossly in it, they think they do no wrong. But let them judge it in

reference to themselves. “A good name is better than precious ointment,”

(Eccles. vii. 1.) “and rather to be chosen than great riches,” Prov. xxii.

1. And is that no wrong, to defile that precious ointment, and to rob or

steal away that jewel more precious than great riches? There is a strange

connection between these. “Thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer,

nor stand against the blood of thy neighbour,” Lev. xix. 16. It is a kind

of murder, because it kills that which is as precious as life to an

ingenuous heart. “The words of a tale bearer are as wounds, and they go

down to the innermost parts of the belly,” Prov. xviii. 8 and xxvi. 22.

They strike a wound to any man’s heart, that can hardly be cured, and

there is nothing that is such a seminary of contention and strife among

brethren as this. It is the oil to feed the flame of alienation. Take away

a tale-bearer, and strife ceaseth, Prov. xxvi. 20. Let there be but any

(as there want not such who have no other trade or occupation), to whisper

into the ears of brethren, and suggest evil apprehensions of them, they

will separate chief friends, as we see it in daily experience, Prov. xvi.

28. “Revilers” are amongst these who are excluded out of the kingdom of

God, 1 Cor. vi. 10. And therefore, as the Holy Ghost gives general

precepts for the profitable and edifying improvement of the tongue, that

so it may indeed be the glory of a man, (which truly is no small point of

religion, as James expresses, Chap. iii. 2. “If any man offend not in

word, the same is a perfect man,”) so that same spirit gives us particular

directions about this, “Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that

speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of

the law, and judgeth the law,” (James iv. 11.) because he puts himself in

the place of the Lawgiver, and his own judgment and fancy in the room of

the law, and so judges the law. And therefore the Apostle Peter makes a

wise and significant connection, 1 Pet. ii. 1. “Laying aside all malice,

and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil-speakings.”

Truly, evil speaking of our brethren, though it may be true, yet it

proceeds out of the abundance of these, in the heart, of guile, hypocrisy,

and envy. While we catch at a name of piety from censuring others, and

build our own estimation upon the ruins of another’s good name, hypocrisy

and envy are too predominant. If we would indeed grow in grace by the

word, and taste more how gracious the Lord is, we must lay these aside,

and become as little children, without guile, and without gall. Many

account it excuse enough, that they did not invent evil tales, or were not

the first broachers of them; but the Scripture joins both together. The

man that “shall abide in his tabernacle” must neither vent nor invent

them, neither cast them down nor take them up, “He backbiteth not with his

tongue, nor taketh up a reproach against his neighbour;” (Psal. xv. 3.) or

_receiveth not_ or _endureth not_, as in the margin. He neither gives it

nor receives he it, hath not a tongue to speak of others’ faults, nor ear

to hear them. Indeed he hath a tongue to confess his own, and an ear open

to hear another confess his faults, according to that precept, “Confess

your faults one to another.” We are forbidden to have much society or

fellowship with tale-bearers; and it is added, Prov. xx. 19, “And meddle

not with such as flatter with their mouth,” as indeed commonly they who

reproach the absent, flatter the present; a backbiter is a face-flatterer.

And therefore we should not only not meddle with them, but drive them away

as enemies to human society. Charity would in such a case protect itself,

if I may so say, by “an angry countenance,” an appearance of anger and

real dislike. “As the north wind drives away rain,” so that entertainment

would drive away a “backbiting tongue,” Prov. xxv. 23. If we do

discountenance it, backbiters will be discouraged to open their pack of

news and reports: and indeed the receiving readily of evil reports of

brethren, is a partaking with the unfruitful works of darkness, which we

should rather reprove, Eph. v. 11. To join with the teller is to complete

the evil report; for if there were no receiver there would be no teller,

no tale-bearer. “Charity covers a multitude of sins,” 1 Pet. iv. 8; and

therefore “above all things have fervent charity among yourselves,” says

he. What is above prayer and watching unto the end, above sobriety?

Indeed, in reference to fellowship with God, these are above all; but in

relation to comfortable fellowship one with another in this world, this is

above all, and the crown or cream of other graces. He whose sins are

covered by God’s free love, cannot think it hard to spread the garment of

his love over his brother’s sins. Hatred stirreth up strife, all

uncharitable affections, as envy, wrath. It stirreth up contentions, and

blazeth abroad men’s infirmities. But “love covereth all sins,” concealeth

them from all to whom the knowledge of them doth not belong, Prov. x. 12.

Love in a manner suffers not itself to know what it knoweth, or at least

to remember it much. It will sometimes hoodwink itself to a favourable

construction. It will pass by an infirmity and misken(418) it, but many

stand still and commune with it. But he that covereth a transgression

seeks love to bury offences in. Silence is a notable mean to preserve

concord, and beget true amity and friendship. The keeping of faults long

above ground unburied, doth make them cast forth an evil savour that will

ever part friends. Therefore, says the wise man, “He that covereth a

transgression seeketh love: but he that repeateth a matter separateth very

friends,” Prov. xvii. 9. Covering faults christianly, will make a stranger

a friend; but repeating and blazing of them will make a friend not only a

stranger, but an enemy. Yet this is nothing to the prejudice of that

Christian duty of reproving and admonishing one another, Eph. v. 11. “Have

no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove

them.” Love commands to reprove in the “spirit of meekness,” (Gal. vi. 1.)

as a man would restore an arm out of joint. And therefore thou “shall not

hate him in thy heart, but shall in any ways reprove him, and not suffer

sin upon him,” Lev. xix. 17. And he that reproves his brother after this

manner from love, and in meekness and wisdom, “shall afterward find more

favour of him than he that flatters with his tongue,” Prov. xxviii. 23. To

cover grudges and jealousies in our hearts, were to nourish a flame in our

bosom, which doth but wait for a vent, and will at one occasion or other

burst out. But to look too narrowly to every step, and to write up a

register of men’s mere frailties, especially so as to publish them to the

world; that is inconsistent with the rule of love. And truly, it is a

token of one “destitute of wisdom to despise his neighbour; but a man of

understanding will hold his peace.” He that has most defects himself, will

find maniest(419) in others, and strive to vilify them one way or other;

but a wise man can pass by frailties, yea, offences done to him, and be

silent, Prov. xi. 12.

The Works of the Rev. Hugh Binning · 第 4 / 11 章