Chapter III.

I may briefly reduce the chief persuading motive to this so needful and so

much desiderated grace into some three or four heads. All things within

and without persuade to it, but especially the right consideration of the

love of God in Christ, the wise and the impartial reflection on ourselves,

the consideration of our brethren whom we are commanded to love, and the

thorough inspection into the nature and use of the grace itself.

In consideration of the _First_, a soul might argue itself into a

complacency with it and thus persuade itself, “He that loveth not, knoweth

not God, for God is love,” 1 John iv. 8. And since he that hath known and

believed the love that God hath to us, must certainly dwell in love, since

these two have such a strait indissoluble connexion, then, as I would not

declare to all my atheism and my ignorance of God, I will study to love my

brethren. And that I may love them, I will give myself to the search of

God’s love, which is the place, _locus inventionis_,(414) whence I may

find out the strongest and most effectual _medium_ to persuade my mind,

and to constrain my heart to Christian affection.

_First_ then, when I consider that so glorious and great a Majesty, so

high and holy an One, self sufficient and all sufficient, who needs not go

abroad to seek delight, because all happiness and delight is enclosed

within his own bosom, can yet love a creature, yea and be reconciled to so

sinful a creature, which he might crush as easily as speak a word, that he

can place his delight on so unworthy and base an object, O! how much more

should I, a poor wretched creature, love my fellow creature, ofttimes

better than myself, and, for the most part, not much worse? There is an

infinite distance and disproportion betwixt God and man, yet he came over

all that to love man. What difficulty should I have then to place my

affection on my equal at worst, and often better? There cannot be any

proportionable distance betwixt the highest and lowest, between the

richest and poorest, between the most wise and the most ignorant, between

the most gracious and the most ungodly, as there is between the infinite

God and a finite angel. Should then the mutual infirmities and failings of

Christians, be an insuperable and impassable gulf, as between heaven and

hell, that none can pass over by a bridge of love to either? “If God so

loved us,” should not we love one another? 1 John iv. 11. And besides,

when I consider that God hath not only loved me, but my brethren who were

worthy of hatred, with an everlasting love, and passed over all that was

in them, and hath spread his skirt over their nakedness, and made it a

time of love, which was a time of loathing, how can I withhold my

affection where God hath bestowed his? Are they not infinitely more

unworthy of his than mine? Since infinite wrongs hath not changed his,

shall poor, petty, and light offences hinder mine? That my love concenter

with God’s on the same persons, is it not enough?

_Next_, That Jesus Christ, the only begotten of the Father, full of grace

and truth, who was the Father’s delight from eternity, and in whom he

delighted, yet, not withstanding, could rejoice in the habitable places of

the earth, and so love poor wretched men, yet enemies, that he gave

himself for them, that God so loved that he gave his Son, and Christ so

loved that he gave himself a sacrifice for sin, both for me and others, O!

who should not or will not be constrained, in beholding this mirror of

incomparable and spotless love to love others? (1 John iv. 9, 10, 11.) “In

this was manifested the love of God towards us, because that God sent his

only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. Herein

is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to

be the propitiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought

also to love one another.” Eph. v. 2. “And walk in love, as Christ also

hath loved us, and hath given himself for us, an offering and a sacrifice

to God for a sweet smelling savour,” especially when he seems to require

no other thing, and imposes no more grievous command upon us for

recompence of all his labour of love. John xiii. 34, 35. “A new

commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another, as I have loved

you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are

my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” If all that was in me did

not alienate his love from me, how should any thing in others estrange our

love to them? If God be so kind to his enemies, and Christ so loving that

he gives his life for his enemies to make them friends, what should we do

to our enemies, what to our friends? This one example may make all created

love to blush and be ashamed. How narrow, how limited, how selfish is it!

_Thirdly_, If God hath forgiven me so many grievous offences, if he hath

pardoned so heinous and innumerable injuries, that amount to a kind of

infiniteness in number and quality, O how much more am I bound to forgive

my brethren a few light and trivial offences? Col. iii. 13. “Forbearing

one another, and forgiving one another, if any man have a quarrel against

any, even as Christ forgave you, so also do ye.” Eph. iv. 32. “And be ye

kind one to another, tender hearted, forgiving one another, even as God

for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you.” With what face can I pray, “Lord,

forgive me my sins,” when I may meet with such a retortion, thou canst not

forgive thy brethren’s sins, infinitely less both in number and degree?

Matth. vi. 15. “But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will

your heavenly Father forgive your trespasses.” What unparalleled

ingratitude were it, what monstrous wickedness, that after he hath

forgiven all our debt, because we desired him yet we should not have

compassion on our fellow servants even as he had pity on us! O! what a

dreadful sound will that be in the ears of many Christians, “O thou wicked

servant, I forgave thee all thy debt, because thou desiredst me! Shouldest

not thou also have had compassion on thy fellow servants, even as I had

pity on thee? And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors,

till he should pay all that was due unto him. So likewise shall my

heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every

one his brother their trespasses,” Matth. xviii. 32, 33, 34, 35. When we

cannot dispense with one penny, how should he dispense with his talents?

And when we cannot pardon ten, how should he forgive ten thousand? When he

hath forgiven my brother all his iniquity, may not I pardon one? Shall I

impute that which God will not impute, or discover that which God hath

covered? How should I expect he should be merciful to me, when I cannot

shew mercy to my brother? Psal. xviii. 25. “With the merciful thou wilt

show thyself merciful.” Shall I, for one or few offences, hate, bite, and

devour him for whom Christ died, and loved not his life to save him? Rom.

xiv. 15 and 1 Cor. viii. 11.

_In the next place_. If a Christian do but take an impartial view of

himself, he cannot but thus reason himself to a meek, composed, and

affectionate temper towards other brethren. What is it in another that

offends me, when if I do search within, I will not either find the same,

or worse, or as evil in myself? Is there a mote in my brothers eye?

Perhaps there may be a beam in my own; and why then should I look to the

mote that is in my brother’s eye? Matth. vii. 3. When I look inwardly, I

find a desperately wicked heart, which lodges all that iniquity I beheld

in others. And if I be not so sensible of it, it is because it is also

deceitful above all things, and would flatter me in mine own eyes, Jer.

xvii. 9. If my brother offend me in some things, how do these evanish out

of sight in the view of my own guiltiness before God, and of the

abominations of my own heart, known to his holiness and to my conscience?

Sure I cannot see so much evil in my brother as I find in myself. I see

but his outside. But I know my own heart; and whenever I retire within

this, I find the sea of corruption so great, that I wonder not at the

streams which break forth in others. But all my wonder is that God hath

set bounds to it in me or in any. Whenever I find my spirit rising against

the infirmities of others, and my mind swelling over them, I repress

myself with this thought, “I myself also am a man,” as Peter said to

Cornelius when he would have worshipped him. As he restrained another’s

idolizing of him, I may cure my own self idolizing heart. Is it any thing

strange that weak men fail, and sinful men fall? Is not all flesh grass,

and all the perfection and goodliness of it as the flower of the field?

Isa. xl. 6. Is not every man at his best estate altogether vanity? Psal.

xxxix. 5. Is not man’s breath in his nostrils? Isa. ii. 22. And am not I

myself a man? Therefore I will not be high minded but fear, Rom. xi. 20. I

will not be moved to indignation, but provoked to compassion, knowing that

I myself am compassed with infirmities, Heb. v. 2.

_Secondly_, As a man may persuade himself to charity by the examination of

his own heart and ways, so he may enforce upon his spirit a meek and

compassionate stamp, by the consideration of his own frailty, what he may

fall into. This is the Apostle’s rule, Gal. vi. 1. “Brethren, if a man be

overtaken in a fault, ye that are spiritual,” and pretend to it, “restore

such an one in the spirit of meekness.” Do not please yourselves with a

false notion of zeal, thinking to cover your impertinent rigidity by it.

Do as you would do if your own arm were disjointed. Set it in, restore it

tenderly and meekly, considering yourselves that ye also may be tempted.

Some are more given to reproaching and insulting than mindful of

restoring. Therefore their reproofs are not tempered with oil that they

may not break the head, but mixed with gall and vinegar to set on edge the

teeth. But whenever thou lookest upon the infirmities of others, then

consider thyself first, before you pronounce sentence on them, and thou

shalt be constrained to bestow that charity to others which thou hast need

of thyself. _Veniam petimusque damusque vicissim._(415) If a man have need

of charity from his brother, let him not be hard in giving it. If he know

his own weakness and frailty, sure he may suppose such a thing may likely

fall out that he may be tempted and succumb in it. For there needs nothing

for the bringing forth of sin in any but occasion and temptation, as the

bringing of fire near gunpowder. And truly he who had no allowance of love

to give to an infirm and weak brother, he will be in _mala fide_, in an

evil capacity, to seek what he would not give. Now the fountain of

uncharitable and harsh dealing is imported in the 3d verse, “If any man

thinks himself to be something when he is nothing, he deceives himself.”

Since all mortal men are nothing, vanity, altogether vanity, and less than

vanity, he that would seem something, and seems so to himself, deludes

himself. Hence is our insulting fierceness, hence our supercilious rigour.

Every man apprehends some excellency in himself beyond another. Take away

pride, and charity shall enter, and modesty shall be its companion. But

now we mock ourselves, and deceive ourselves, by building the weight of

our pretended zeal upon such a vain and rotten foundation, as a gross

practical fundamental lie of self conceit of nothing. Now the Apostle

furnishes us with an excellent remedy against this in the 4th verse, “Let

a man prove himself and his own work, and then he shall have rejoicing in

himself alone, and not in another.”—a word worthy to be fastened by the

Master of assemblies in the heart of all Christians! And indeed this nail

driven in would drive out all conceit. Hence is our ruin, that we compare

ourselves among ourselves, and in so doing we are not wise, 2 Cor. x. 12.

For we know not our own true value. Only we raise the price according to

the market, so to speak. We measure ourselves by another man’s measure,

and build up our estimation upon the disesteem of others, and how much

others displease, so much we please ourselves. But, says the Apostle, let

every man prove his own work, search his own conscience, compare himself

to the perfect rule; and then, if he find all well, he may indeed glory of

himself. But that which thou hast by comparison with others is not thine

own. Thou must come down from all such advantages of ground, if thou would

have thy just measure. And indeed, if thou prove thyself and thy work

after this manner, thou wilt be the first to reprove thyself, thou shalt

have that glory due unto thee, that is none at all. For every man shall

bear his own burden, when he appears before the judgment seat of God.

There is no place for such imaginations and comparisons in the Lord’s

judgment.

_Thirdly_, When a Christian looks within his own heart, he finds an

inclination and desire to have the love of others, even though his

conscience witness that he deserves it not. He finds an approbation of

that good and righteous command of God, that others should love him. Now

hence he may persuade himself—Is it so sweet and pleasant to me to be

loved of others, even though I am conscious that I have wronged them? Hath

it such a beauty in my eye, while I am the object of it? Why then should

it be a hard and grievous burden to me to love others, though they have

wronged me, and deserve it no more than I did? Why hath it not the same

amiable aspect, when my brother is the object of it? Certainly no reason

for it, but because I am yet carnal, and have not that fundamental law of

nature yet distinctly written again upon my heart, “What ye would that

others should do to you, do it to them,” Matth. vii. 12. If I be convinced

that there is any equity and beauty in that command, which charges others

to love me, forgive me, and forbear me, and restore me in meekness, why

should it be a grievous command that I should pay that debt of love and

tenderness to others? 1 John v. 3. “For this is the love of God, that we

keep his commandments, and his commandments are not grievous.”

_In the third place_. Consider to whom this affection should be extended.

More generally to all men, as fellow creatures, but particularly and

especially to all who are begotten of God, as fellow Christians. “And this

commandment have we from him, that he who loveth God love his brother

also. Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and

every one that loveth him that begat, loveth him also that is begotten of

him,” 1 John iv. 21, and chap v. 1. “As we have therefore opportunity, let

us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of

faith,” Gal. vi. 10. “O my soul, thou hast said unto the Lord, Thou art my

Lord, my goodness extendeth not to thee: but unto the saints that are in

the earth, and to the excellent in whom is all my delight,” Psal. xvi. 2,

3. And this consideration the Holy Ghost suggests to make us maintain love

and unity. Love towards these runs in a purer channel—“Ye have purified

your souls in obeying the truth through the Spirit unto the unfeigned love

of the brethren, see that ye love one another with a pure heart fervently,

being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the

word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever,” 1 Pet. i. 22, 23. We are

begotten of one Father, and that by a divine birth, we have such a high

descent and royal generation! There are so many other bonds of unity

between us, it is absurd that this one more should not join all. “One

Lord, one faith, one baptism, one body, one spirit, called to one hope,

one God and Father of all,” Eph. iv. 2-6. All these being one, it is

strange if we be not one in love. If so many relations beget not a strong

and warm affection, we are worse than infidels, as the apostle speaks, 1

Tim. v. 8. “If a man care not for his own house, his worldly interests,

he is worse than an infidel,” for he has a natural affection. Sure then

this more excellent nature, a divine nature we are partakers of, cannot

want affection suitable to its nature. Christianity is a fraternity, a

brotherhood, that should overpower all relations, bring down him of high

degree, and exalt him of low degree; it should level all ranks, in this

one respect, unto the rule of charity and love. In Christ there is

neither Jew nor Gentile. There all differences of tongues and nations are

drowned in this interest of Christ, Col. iii. 11. “Thou hast hid those

things from the wise and prudent, and revealed them unto babes,” Luke x.

21. And “God hath chosen the weak and foolish to confound the mighty and

wise,” 1 Cor. i. 27. Behold all these outward privileges buried in the

depths and riches of God’s grace and mercy. Are we not all called to one

high calling? Our common station is to war under Christ’s banner against

sin and Satan. Why then do we leave our station, forget our callings, and

neglect that employment which concerns us all, and fall at odds with our

fellow-soldiers, and bite and devour one another? Doth not this give

advantage to our common enemies? While we consume the edge of our zeal

and strength of our spirits one upon another, they must needs be blunted

and weakened towards our deadly enemies. If our brother be represented

unto us under the covering of many faults, failings, and obstinacy in his

errors, or such like, if we can behold nothing but spots on his outside,

while we judge after some outward appearance, then, I say, we ought to

consider him again under another notion and relation, as he stands in

Christ’s account, as he is radically and virtually of that seed, which

hath more real worth in it than all worldly privileges and dignities.

Consider him as he once shall be, when mortality shall be put off. Learn

to strip him naked of all infirmities in thy consideration, and imagine

him to be clothed with immortality, and glory, and think how thou wouldest

then love him. If either thou unclothe him of his infirmities, and

consider him as vested now with the robe of Christ’s righteousness, and

all glorious within, or adorned with immortality and incorruption a little

hence; or else, if thou clothe thyself with such infirmities as thou seest

in him, and consider that thou art not less subject to failing, and

compassed with infirmities, then thou shalt put on, and keep on, that bond

of perfection, charity.

_Lastly_. Let us consider the excellent nature of charity, and how it is

interested in, and interwoven with all the royal and divine gifts and

privileges of a Christian. All of them are not ashamed of kindred and

cognation with charity. Is not the calling and profession of a Christian

honourable? Sure to any behoving soul it is above a monarchy; for it

includes an anointing both to a royal and priestly office, and carries a

title to a kingdom incorruptible and undefiled. Well then, charity is the

symbol and badge of this profession, John xiii. 35. “By this shall all

men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.” Then,

what is comparable to communion with God, and dwelling in him? Shall God

indeed dwell with men, said Solomon? That exalts the soul to a royalty,

and elevates it above mortality. _Quam contempta res est homo si supra

humana se non exerat!_ “How base and contemptible a thing is man, except

he lift up his head above human things to heavenly and divine!” And then

is the soul truly magnified while it is ascending to its own element, a

divine nature. What more gracious than this, for a soul to dwell in God?

And what more glorious than this, God to dwell in the soul? _Charitas te

domum Domini facit, et Dominum domum tibi. Felix artifex charitas quæ

conditori suo domum fabricare potest!_ “Love makes the soul a house for

the Lord, and makes the Lord a house to the soul. Happy artificer that

can build a house for its master!” Love bringeth him, who is the chief

among ten thousand, into the chambers of the heart. It lays him all night

between its breasts; and is still emptying itself of all superfluity of

naughtiness, and purging out all vanity and filthiness, that there may be

more room for his Majesty. And then love dwells in God, in his love and

grace, in his goodness and greatness. The secret of his presence it

delights in. Now this mutual inhabitation, in which it is hard to say

whether the Majesty of God does most descend, or the soul most ascend,

whether he be more humbled or it exalted, this brotherly love, I say, is

the evidence and assurance of it. “If we love one another, God dwells in

us, and his love is perfected in us. God is love, and he that dwelleth in

love dwelleth in God, and God in him,” 1 John iv. 12, 16. For the love of

the image of God in his children, is indeed the love of God whose image it

is, and then is the love of God perfected, when it reacheth and extends

from God to all that is God’s, to all that hath interest in God—his

commandments, (1 John v. 3. “This is the love of God, that we keep his

commandments, and his commandments are not grievous,” 1 John iv. 21, “And

this commandment have we from him, that he who loveth God love his brother

also,”) his children, (1 John v. 1, “Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the

Christ is born of God, and every one that loveth him that begat, loveth

him that is begotten of him,”) his creatures, (Mal. ii. 10, “Hath not one

God created us, why do we deal treacherously every man against his

brother?”) The love of God being the formal, the special motive of love to

our brethren, it elevates the nature of it, and makes it divine love. He

that hath true Christian love, doth not only love and compassionate his

brother, either because of its own inclination towards him, or his misery

and necessity, or his goodness and excellency. These motives and grounds

do not transcend mere morality, and so cannot beget a love which is the

symptom of Christianity. If there be no other motives than these, we do

not love so much for God as for ourselves; for compassion interesting

itself with another man’s misery, finds a kind of relief in relieving it.

Therefore the will and good pleasure of God must be the rule of this

motion, and the love of God must begin in it and continue it. And truly

charity is nothing else but divine love in a state of condescent,(416) so

to speak, or the love of a soul to God manifested in the flesh. It is that

love moving in a circle from God towards his creatures, and unto God

again, as his love to the creatures begins in himself and ends in himself,

1 John iii. 17. Is it not a high thing to know God aright? “This is life

eternal to know thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast

sent,” John xvii. 3. That is a high note of excellency put on it, this

makes the face of the soul to shine, now brotherly love evinceth this,

that we know God, “Beloved, let us love one another, for love is of God,

and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth

not, knoweth not God, for God is love,” 1 John iv. 7, 8. Love is real

light, light and life, light and heat both. “When your fathers did execute

judgment, and relieve the oppressed, &c. was not this to know me? saith

the Lord,” Jer. xxii. 15, 16. The practice of the most common things, out

of the love of God, and respect to his commands, is more real and true

religion than the most profound and abstracted speculations of knowledge.

Then only is God known, when knowledge stamps the heart with fear and

reverence of his Majesty and love to his name, because then he is only

known as he is a true and living God.

Love is real light and life. Is it not “a pleasant thing for the eye to

behold the sun?” Light is sweet, and life is precious. These are two of

the rarest jewels given to men. “He that saith he is in the light, and

hateth his brother, is in darkness even until now, and knoweth not whither

he goeth; because darkness hath blinded his eyes, but he that loveth his

brother abideth in the light, and there is none occasion of stumbling in

him,” 1 John ii. 9-11. “We know that we have passed from death unto life,

because we love the brethren; he that loveth not his brother, abideth in

death,” 1 John iii. 14. The light of Jesus Christ cannot shine into the

heart, but it begets(417) love, even as intense light begets heat, and

where this impression is not made on the heart, it is an evidence that the

beams of that Sun of righteousness have not pierced it. O how suitable is

it for a child of light to walk in love! And wherefore is it made day

light to the soul, but that it may rise up and go forth to labour, and

exercise itself in the works of the day, duties of love to God and men?

Now in such a soul there is no cause of stumbling, no scandal, no offence

in its way to fall over. When the light and knowledge of Christ possesses

the heart in love, there is no stumbling block of transgression in its

way. It doth not fall and stumble at the commandments of righteousness and

mercy as grievous, “therefore love is the fulfilling of the law,” Rom.

xiii. 10. And so the way of charity is the most easy, plain, expedient,

and safe way. In this way there is light shining all alongst it, and

there is no stumbling block in it. For the love of God and of our

brethren hath polished and made it all plain, hath “taken away the

asperities and tumours of our affections and lusts.” _Complanavit

affectus._ “Great peace have all they that love thy law, and nothing shall

offend them.” Love makes an equable and constant motion, it moves swiftly

and sweetly. It can loose many knots without difficulty, which other more

violent principles cannot cut, it can melt away mountains before it, which

cannot be hauled away. Albeit there be many stumbling blocks without in

the world, yet there is none in charity, or in a charitable soul. None

can enter into that soul to hinder it to possess itself in meekness and

patience. Nothing can discompose it within, or hinder it to live

peaceably with others. Though all men’s hands be against it, yet charity

is against none. It defends itself with innocence and patience. On the

other hand, “He that hateth his brother is in darkness even till now.”

For if Christ’s light had entered, then the love of Christ had come with

it, and that is the law of love and charity. If Jesus Christ had come into

the soul, he had restored the ancient commandment of love, and made it new

again. As much of the want of love and charity, so much of the old

ignorance and darkness remains. Whatsoever a man may fancy of himself

that he is in the light, that he is so much advanced in the light, yet

certainly this is a stronger evidence of remaining darkness, for it is a

work of the darkest darkness, and murdering affection, suitable only for

the night of darkness. And such a man knows not whither he goes, and must

needs incur and fall upon many stumbling blocks within and without. It is

want of love and charity that blinds the mind and darkens the heart, that

it cannot see how to eschew and pass by scandals in others, but it must

needs dash and break its neck upon them. Love is a light which may lead

us by offences inoffensively, and without stumbling. In darkness men

mistake the way, know not the end of it, take pits for plain ways, and

stumble in them. Uncharitableness casts a mist over the actions and

courses of others, and our own too, that we cannot carry on either without

transgression. And this is the misery of it, that it cannot discern any

fault in itself. It knows not whither it goeth, calls light darkness and

darkness light. It is partial in judgment, pronounces always on its own

behalf, cares not whom it condemn, that it may absolve itself.

Is there any privilege so precious as this, to be “the sons of God?” 1

John iii. 2. What are all relations, or states, or conditions, to this

one, to be the children of the Highest? It was David’s question, “Should

I be the king’s son in law?” Alas! what a petty and poor dignity in regard

of this, to be “the sons of God,” partakers of a divine nature? All the

difference of birth, all the distinction of degrees and qualities amongst

persons, besides this one, are but such as have no being, no worth but in

the fancy and construction of them. They really are nothing, and can do

nothing. This only is a substantial and fundamental difference. A divine

birth carries along with it a divine nature, a change of principles, from

the worst to the best, from darkness to light, from death to life. Now,

imagine then, what excellency is in this grace, which is made the

character of a son of God, of one begotten of the Father, and passed from

death to life? 1 John iii. 10, 14. “In this the children of God are

manifest, and the children of the devil. Whosoever doth not righteousness

is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother. We know that we

have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren, he that

loveth not his brother, abideth in death.” 1 John iv. 7. “Beloved, let us

love one another, for love is of God, and every one that loveth is born of

God, and knoweth God.” And truly it is most natural, if it be so, that the

children of our Father love each other dearly. It is monstrous and

unnatural to see it otherwise. But besides, there is in this a great deal

of resemblance of their Father, whose eminent and signal property it is,

to be good to all and kind even to the unthankful, and whose incomparable

glory it is to pardon iniquity, and suffer long patiently. A Christian

cannot resemble his Father more nearly than in this. Why do we account

that baseness in us which is glory to God? Are we ashamed of our birth, or

dare we not own our Father? Shall we be ashamed to love them as brethren

whom he hath not been ashamed to adopt as sons, and whom Christ is not

ashamed to call brethren?

The Works of the Rev. Hugh Binning · 第 3 / 11 章